Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Excellence and Precedence

Devin Stewart

American Journal of Islam and Society · 2004

doi:10.35632/ajis.v21i2.1804 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The question of the imamate or the caliphate, the designation of the Muslim community’s legitimate leader, is undoubtedly one of the most important in Islamic history. The first civil war (656-61), which broke out with the murder of Caliph `Uthman, had a profound effect not only on subsequent Islamic political and religious institutions, but also on later Muslims’ views, accounts, and discussions of the community’s early history. This bitter conflict, which necessarily involved extensive controversy concerning the identity and required qualifications of the community’s legitimate leader, laid the foundations for an enduring theological split among Islam’s three major “sects”: the Shi`ites, the Sunnis, and the Kharijis – one that would persist long after the war ended with the assassination of `Ali. Polemics among these groups, and among subcategories of the three main groups, each of which endeavored to justify its contemporary views on legitimate leadership and sectarian identity, were a creative force in many fields. Bodies of theoretical discussion, primarily in theology but also in law and other fields, grew around these polemics, using prooftexts from the Qur’an and Hadith, as well as historical accounts, as evidence in arguments about the Companions, their relationships with the Prophet, their relative merits and other moral qualities, and their dealings with each other. Though focused on a much earlier period and concerning conflicts long over, these polemics were all the more sensitive and emotionally charged because of their contemporary implications concerning the legitimacy of the sectarian groups’ beliefs. Her work reveals, by examining one important intellectual exchange, some of the processes by which this body of theoretical discussion grew. It analyzes Bina’ al-Maqalah al-Fatimiyah fi Naqd al-Risalah al- `Uthmaniyah, a seventh-/thirteenth-century polemical Shi`ite work on the imamate, itself a refutation of a third-/ninth-century polemical work. The author, Jamal al-Din Ahmad ibn Musa ibn Tawus (d. 673/1274-75), belonged to an established Twelver Shi`ite scholarly family from Hillah, southern Iraq. Both he and his brother, Radiy al-Din `Ali ibn Tawus (d. 664/1266), were important thirteenth-century scholars, although Radiy al- Din has been better served than Jamal al-Din in modern scholarship since the publication of Kohlberg’s A Medieval Muslim Scholar at Work: Ibn Tawus and His Library (Leiden: 1992)...

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.