Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: a latent profile analysis

Marylène Cloitre, Donn W. Garvert, Chris R. Brewin and 2 more

European Journal of Psychotraumatology · 2013 · CC BY-NC

doi:10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20706

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The WHO International Classification of Diseases, 11th version (ICD-11), has proposed two related diagnoses, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD within the spectrum of trauma and stress-related disorders. OBJECTIVE: To use latent profile analysis (LPA) to determine whether there are classes of individuals that are distinguishable according to the PTSD and complex PTSD symptom profiles and to identify potential differences in the type of stressor and severity of impairment associated with each profile. METHOD: An LPA and related analyses were conducted on 302 individuals who had sought treatment for interpersonal traumas ranging from chronic trauma (e.g., childhood abuse) to single-incident events (e.g., exposure to 9/11 attacks). RESULTS: THE LPA REVEALED THREE CLASSES OF INDIVIDUALS: (1) a complex PTSD class defined by elevated PTSD symptoms as well as disturbances in three domains of self-organization: affective dysregulation, negative self-concept, and interpersonal problems; (2) a PTSD class defined by elevated PTSD symptoms but low scores on the three self-organization symptom domains; and (3) a low symptom class defined by low scores on all symptoms and problems. Chronic trauma was more strongly predictive of complex PTSD than PTSD and, conversely, single-event trauma was more strongly predictive of PTSD. In addition, complex PTSD was associated with greater impairment than PTSD. The LPA analysis was completed both with and without individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) yielding identical results, suggesting the stability of these classes regardless of BPD comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data support the proposed ICD-11 distinction between PTSD and complex PTSD and support the value of testing the clinical utility of this distinction in field trials. Replication of results is necessary.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 27

  1. 1.

    Brewin C. R, Lanius R. A, Novac A, Schnyder U, Galea S. Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2009;22:366-373.

    Not in our library10.1002/jts.20443

  2. 2.

    Briere J, Rickards S. Self-awareness, affect regulation, and relatedness: Differential sequels of childhood versus adult victimization experiences. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2007;195:497-503.

    Not in our library10.1097/nmd.0b013e31803044e2

  3. 3.

    Cloitre M, Courtois C. C, Charuvastra A, Carapezza R, Stolbach B. C, Green B. L. Treatment of complex PTSD: Results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey on best practices. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2011;24(6):616-627.

    Not in our library10.1002/jts.20697

  4. 4.

    Cloitre M, Courtois C. A, Ford J. D, Green B. L, Alexander P, Briere J, et al. The ISTSS expert consensus treatment guidelines for complex PTSD in adults. 2012.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Courtois C. C. Complex trauma, complex reactions: Assessment and treatment, Psychotherapy: Theory, Practice. Training. 2004;41:412-425.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Derogatis L. R, Melisaratos N. The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine. 1983;13:595-605.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Falsetti S. A, Resnick H. S, Resick P. A, Kilpatrick D. G. The modified PTSD symptom scale: A brief self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. The Behavioral Therapist. 1993;16:161-162.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    First M. B, Gibbon M, Spitzer R. L, Williams J. B. W, Benjamin L. S. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders, (SCID-II). 1997.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Foa E. B, Keane T. M, Friedman M. J, Cohen J. Effective treatments for PTSD: Practice guidelines from the international society for traumatic stress studies. 2008.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Herman J. L. Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic violence to political terrorism. 1992.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Kline R. B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2004.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Lanius R. A, Brand B. B, Vermetten E, Frewen P. A, Spiegel D. The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder: Rationale, clinical and neurobiological evidence, and implications. Depression and Anxiety. 2012;29:701-708.

    Not in our library10.1002/da.21889

  13. 13.

    Lazarsfeld P. F, Henry N. W. Latent structure analysis. 1968.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Linehan M. M. Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. 1993.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Maercker A, Brewin C. R, Bryant R. A, Cloitre M, Reed G. M, Van Ommeren M, et al. Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the ICD-11. Lancet. 2013.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62191-6

  16. 16.

    Nylund K. L, Asparouhov T, Muthen B. O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling. 2007;14(4):535-569.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Reed G. M. Toward ICD-11: Improving the clinical utility of WHO's international classification of mental disorders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2010;41:457-464.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Reed G. M, Correia J. M, Esparza P, Saxena S, Maj M. The WPA-WHO global survey of psychiatrists’ attitudes towards mental disorders classification. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:118-131.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00034.x

  19. 19.

    Resick P. A, Bovin M. J, Calloway A. L, Dick A. M, King M. W, Mitchell K. S, et al. A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2012;25:241-251.

    Not in our library10.1002/jts.21699

  20. 20.

    Roth S, Newman E, Pelcovitz D, Van der Kolk B, Mandel F. S. Complex PTSD in victims exposed to sexual and physical abuse: Results from the DSM-IV field trial for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1997;10:539-555.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1024837617768

  21. 21.

    Sar V. Developmental trauma, complex PTSD and the current proposal of DSM-5. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2011;2.

    Not in our library10.3402/ejpt.v2i0.5622

  22. 22.

    Spitzer R. L, First M. B, Wakefield J. C. Saving PTSD from itself in DSM-V. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2007;21:233-241.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.09.006

  23. 23.

    Van der Kolk B. A, Roth S, Pelcovitz D, Sunday S, Spinazzola J. Disorders of extreme stress: The empirical foundation of a complex adaptation to trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2005;18:389-399.

    Not in our library10.1002/jts.20047

  24. 24.

    Van Emmerik A. A, Kamphuis J. H. Testing a DSM–5 reformulation of posttraumatic stress disorder: Impact on prevalence and comorbidity among treatment-seeking civilian trauma survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2011;24:213-217.

    Not in our library10.1002/jts.20630

  25. 25.

    Weissman E, Bothell S. Assessment of patient social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1976;33:1111-1115.

    Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010

  26. 26.

    Wolfe J, Kimerling R, Wilson J. P, Keane T. M. Gender issues in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. 1997;192-238.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. 1992.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.