Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Dengue — Quo tu et quo vadis?

Rubing Chen, Nikos Vasilakis

Viruses · 2011 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/v3091562

Abstract

Dengue viruses (DENV) are by far the most important arboviral pathogens in the tropics around the world, putting at risk of infection nearly a third of the global human population. DENV are members of the genus Flavivirus in the Family Flaviviridae and comprise four antigenically distinct serotypes (DENV-1-4). Although they share almost identical epidemiological features, they are genetically distinct. Phylogenetic analyses have revealed valuable insights into the origins, epidemiology and the forces that shape DENV evolution in nature. In this review, we examine the current status of DENV evolution, including but not limited to rates of evolution, selection pressures, population sizes and evolutionary constraints, and we discuss how these factors influence transmission, pathogenesis and emergence.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Dengue viruses (DENV) are arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) in the genus Flavivirus (family Flaviviridae) with positive polarity, single-stranded RNA. They utilize Aedes (Stegomyia) spp., primarily Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, as vectors for domestic and peridomestic transmission, and arboreal Aedes mosquitoes as vectors for enzootic transmission (Figure 1). All DENV group into four genetically related but antigenically distinct serotypes (DENV-1, -2, -3 and -4) within the dengue (DEN) antigenic complex. They are extremely restricted in their natural vertebrate host range, which includes only primates, although some reports suggest for a putative, unconfirmed, extended vertebrate host range. After World War II there was an explosive increase in the geographic distribution of all four DENV serotypes fueled by uncontrolled urbanization, rapid population movement facilitated by jet travel, inadequate water, sewer and waste management, as well as unsustainable vector control programs. At present, all four DENV serotypes can be found in nearly all urban and peri-urban environments throughout the tropics and subtropics where Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti aegypti and Ae. (Stegomyia) albopictus are present. Thus the global distribution of these two major vectors puts nearly a third of the global human population at risk of infection. Currently DEN has become endemic in more than 100 countries and the disease is spreading to new areas where outbreaks take place in immunologically naïve populations.

By current estimates, the impact of DENV infections on human health is enormous; DENV are responsible for ca. 100 million infections per year presenting in a spectrum of clinical manifestations. While the great majority of infections are accompanied by little no or subclinical signs and symptoms, symptomatic infections commonly manifest as a self-limited flu-like disease [dengue fever (DF)] characterized by a sudden onset of fever, arthralgia, myalgia, retro-orbital headaches, maculopapular rash, and leucopenia. Approximately 1–2% of human infections present clinically as the most severe form of the disease [dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS)], characterized by vascular leakage and/or hemorrhage, leading to ca. 500,000 annual hospitalizations with a case fatality rate of about 5%. Although severe DEN disease is historically associated with pediatric populations in hyperendemic regions (areas in which circulation of all 4 DENV serotypes takes place), recent trends from Southeast Asia and Latin America suggest that adults may also be at risk. Risk factors for the development of severe DEN disease include prior infection with a heterotypic serotype, the strain of the infecting virus, age and gender, nutritional status and the genetic background of the patient. Because of underreporting of disease and under-utilization of health services especially in resource-poor countries, the true health and economic burden due to DENV infections is difficult to estimate. Nonetheless, it is estimated that in the endemic areas of Asia and the Americas, the burden of DEN is in the range 150–1,300 disability adjusted life years (DALY) per million, depending on the spatiotemporal attributes of the epidemics (reviewed in), and the costs associated with a DENV infection significantly exceed the average monthly income of the patient.

In this review, we examine the current status of DENV evolution, including but not limited to rates of evolution, selection pressures, population sizes and evolutionary constraints, and discuss how these factors influence transmission, pathogenesis and emergence.

History, Origin and Emergence of DENV

DENV undoubtedly have a long history of infecting humans. The earliest known references date back to the Chin, Tang and Northern Sung Dynasties [Common Era (CE) 265–420, 610 and 992 AD respectively] describing a disease referred to as ‘water poison,’ clearly for its association with water-associated insects. Since Ae. aegypti aegypti, the primary vector of DENV transmission has been introduced in Asia through the sailing ship trade a few hundred years ago, the likely vector of transmission at that time would have been Ae. albopictus. The next available reports first appeared in the 17th Century and for the next two centuries describe a disease with widespread geographic distribution fueled by the sailing ship and slave trade, which reached pandemic proportions by the late 18th Century (reviewed in). Although the clinical manifestations are consistent with a DEN-like disease, including fever, rash, arthralgia, myalgia and hemorrhagic manifestations, it is possible that the described illness was due to other aetiologic agents [for example chikungunya virus (CHIKV)] that produce illness often indistinguishable from DEN.

Many aspects of the origin and evolution of DENV remain unclear to this day. It has been hypothesized that the human DENV that circulate widely today in urban and peri-urban centers throughout the tropics and neotropics evolved from sylvatic progenitors. Phylogenetic analyses of available DENV gene sequences have shed some light on DENV evolutionary history (Figures 2–5). These analyses indicate that all current distinct DENV serotypes evolved independently and repeatedly in a series of divergence events that occurred after the establishment of large enough urban populations to support the human transmission cycle. This emergence process was facilitated through vector switching, from arboreal Aedes mosquitoes to peridomestic (Ae. albopictus) and domestic (Ae. aegypti aegypti) mosquitoes and switching of reservoir hosts from non-human primates to humans (Figure 1). Furthermore, the emergence of the extant, distinct human DENV strains from the sylvatic transmission cycle was most likely facilitated by the allopatric and perhaps ecological partitioning of ancestral sylvatic DENV strains in different species of non-human primate populations. The onset of transoceanic exploration in the 15th Century and the subsequent establishment of trading routes and waves of human immigration provided the means for the dispersal of the four DENV sylvatic serotypes and the elimination of their allopatric distributions. By then the four serotypes had diverged antigenically to support the limited heterotypic cross-protection against challenge exhibited by current strains of DENV. This reality evidently released the four serotypes from direct competition for susceptible hosts, thus allowing for their sympatry due to incomplete cross-protection, which presumably reduce competition for a common host population. Therefore, the currently observed coexistence of multiple serotypes with their extensive genetic diversity may have been and may still be selected by immune enhancement (enhancement of virus replication following heterologous infection). In such settings, each virus gains replication and transmission efficiency in the human and/or non-human primate host due to limited cross-reactive immunity from previous, heterologous DENV infections (SEE ‘Cross-Immunity as a Driving Force for DENV Evolution’ AND ‘Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Its Effect on DENV Evolution’ sections below). Indeed, several lines of evidence support the role of immune enhancement as a factor in the observed oscillations of DEN incidence. Selection for higher virus replication facilitated by immune enhancement also may influence higher transmissibility by the mosquito vector. Since Ae. aegypti aegypti is only moderately susceptible to DENV infection, selection of strains of higher fitness and thus higher viremia in the vertebrate host may have enhanced its capacity to spread these in new territories and displace endemic strains of lower fitness and pathogenic potential. Thus, even if a vector is highly susceptible and the infection threshold is well below the typical viremia peak titer, higher viremia is usually accompanied by longer viremia such that the amount of time an individual is infectious for a vector is extended.

The geographic origin of DENV has been subject to speculation and debate for decades. Based on the available data it is impossible to conclusively identify Asia versus Africa as the origin of DENV. Some have proposed the ultimate origins of DENV in Africa, based on the circulation there of several closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses and/or the African origin the principal DENV vector, Ae. aegypti aegypti. The argument for the African origin of DENV parallels that of yellow fever virus (YFV), which is also vectored in its human cycle by the same mosquito species, and was introduced into the Americas during the slave trade ca. 300–400 years ago, where it established sylvatic cycles that persist today and which repeatedly seeded spillover epidemics into the human transmission cycle. Gordon Smith suggested the African origin of DENV based on the African origin of Ae. aegypti aegypti which was supported by the following lines of evidence: (i) abundance in Africa of the closely related Aedes (Stegomyia) spp.; (ii) the absence of related Aedes (Stegomyia) spp. in the Americas, and (iii) the Africa-only existence of sylvatic, ancestral Ae. aegypti formosus. However, as discussed below (see ‘Transmission Cycles’ section) sylvatic DENV circulating in Africa do not utilize Ae. aegypti formosus as a vector, and recent evidence indicates this subspecies is refractory to DENV infection. Wang et al. proposed an ‘out of Asia’ origin of DENV, based on the following ecologic and phylogenetic evidence. First, all 4 sylvatic DENV serotypes circulate in Southeast Asia [although there is only serologic evidence of sylvatic DENV-3 circulation and the phylogeny of sylvatic DENV-1 is uncertain (see Sections 4.1 and 4.3)], whereas only sylvatic DENV-2 transmission has been documented in Africa. Second, extensive phylogenetic analyses demonstrate the deep phylogenetic positions of the Asian sylvatic strains. Lastly, Ae. albopictus, a peridomestic mosquito of Asian origin but only a secondary vector for human DENV transmission, has been shown in experimental studies to be more susceptible to DENV virus infection than Ae. aegypti aegypti. Furthermore, early serologic studies (neutralizing antibodies) in Southeast Asia in human populations inhabiting a variety of ecologic habitats devoid of Ae. aegypti aegypti suggest that Ae. albopictus was the original vector for human DENV and that the virus exploited the anthropophagic nature and the extended geographic distribution of the domestic Ae. aegypti aegypti to facilitate the sustained, yet explosive, transmission among humans. Regardless of the arguments presented above, it is clear that a full understanding of the origins and evolutionary history of DENV will require a far larger sample of sylvatic viruses than is currently available. Furthermore, our understanding of DENV origins may be enhanced by extensive metagenomic surveys of flavivirus diversity, since we have undoubtedly only sampled a small fraction of the total diversity of flaviviruses.

Transmission Cycles

The four DENV serotypes are maintained in two distinct transmission cycles: (a) sylvatic and (b) human (Figure 1).

The sylvatic cycle is ecologically and evolutionarily distinct from the human transmission cycle. It takes place in the sylvan environments of Southeast Asia and West Africa in well-documented foci in peninsular Malaysia and eastern Senegal, respectively. Recent phylogenetic analyses have extended the spatiotemporal range in which sylvatic DENV are known to circulate in West Africa. In this cycle, transmission is mediated by arboreal canopy-dwelling Aedes spp. and non-human primates appear to be the only amplification and reservoir hosts. In Africa, the principal vectors include Ae. (Stegomyia) luteocephalus, Ae. (Diceromyia) furcifer, and Ae. (Diceromyia) taylori (Figure 1). Although Ae. furcifer are primarily canopy-dwelling enzootic mosquitoes, they are known to descend to ground level to feed on humans. Surprisingly, the arboreal, ancestral form, Ae. aegypti formosus, of the major domestic vector for DENV transmission (see below), is refractory to sylvatic DENV infection. The primate reservoir hosts in Africa include the Patas monkey (Erythrocebus patas), African green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus), Guinea baboon (Papio papio) and possibly related species such as Papio anubis, Papio ursinus and Papio cynocephalus. In Asia, the principle vectors include the primatophilic canopy-dwelling mosquitoes of the Ae. (Finlaya) niveus s.l. complex, a group that includes Ae. pseudoniveus, Ae. subniveus, Ae. vanus, Ae. albolateralis, Ae. niveoides and Ae. novoniveus. These species are also known to descend to the ground to feed on humans. The Asian primate reservoir hosts include, cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), Southern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) and silvered leaf monkeys (Presbytis cristata) and possibly green-mitered leaf monkeys (Presbytis melaphos) (Figure 1). Although only two documented foci of sylvatic DENV transmission have been recognized, if one considers the extent of the geographic range of either vectors and primate reservoir hosts, it is probable that sylvatic DENV transmission occurs, yet undiscovered, in other locations of tropical Africa and Asia.

To date there is no concrete evidence to document the existence of sylvatic DENV transmission cycle in the Americas. Although several species of New World non-human primates, including Cebus capucinus, Ateles geoffroyi, Ateles fusciceps, Alouatta palliata, Marikina geoffroyi, Saimiri orstedii and Aotus trivirgatus, are susceptible to DENV infection, serological surveys (plaque neutralization) of non-human primates in Panama revealed no evidence of enzootic circulation. However, seroconversions among indigenous Ayoreo Indians living in an isolated forested region of Bolivia, where Ae. aegypti aegypti are not present, suggests that sylvatic DENV transmission may occur in that region. Recently, reported isolations of all four DENV serotypes in several forest mammals including bats, rodents and marsupials probably represent spillbacks from the human transmission cycle.

The opportunistic feeding behavior of the arboreal mosquito vectors described above could facilitate transfer of sylvatic DENV from the forest to peridomestic environments (Figure 1). Indeed, in rural areas of Africa and Asia where enzootic vector(s) often reach high densities, DENV is known to transfer between non-human primates and humans. The moist savannahs surrounding sylvan environments in rural areas of Africa and Asia are defined as the ‘zone of emergence’ (Figure 1). In Asia, the studies of Rudnick demonstrated that zoonotic Ae. niveus vectors descend to the ground to feed on humans, where Ae. albopictus are also abundant, thus allowing the transfer of virus into human habitats. This scenario parallels what has been observed in rural areas adjacent to forests in West Africa, where Ae. furcifer is probably the principal bridge vector between forest and human habitats.

Currently, almost all human infections are due to DENV strains that circulate exclusively in domestic and peridomestic environments throughout the tropics, where humans serve as the sole amplification and reservoir hosts. In this human cycle, Ae. aegypti aegypti mosquitoes transmit DENV, while other Aedes spp. (for example, Ae. albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis) serve as secondary vectors (Figure 1). As described above (see Section 4), although Ae. albopictus may have been the original vector for human transmission, DENV have fully exploited the highly anthropophilic Ae. aegypti aegypti for sustained human transmission. This vector of African origin (its ancestral form Ae. aegypti formosus utilizes treeholes as larval habitats), exploited the sailing ship trade routes of the 1700s, as well as water storage practices, to infest the tropics almost worldwide and in Asia to displace in some locations the native vector, Ae. albopictus. Furthermore, its domesticated nature, which includes oviposition in artificial water containers leading to large numbers of adult mosquitoes in close proximity to humans, as well as its diurnal feeding pattern and endophilic behavior, permitted it to surpass in epidemiological importance all other Aedes spp. Other behaviors of Ae. aegypti aegypti that increase its vectorial capacity include its feeble and nervous nature, where feeding interruption at the slightest of movement leads to subsequent return to the same or different host, and its preference for blood over plant nectars for energetic needs. These behaviors increase the potential for this species to transmit a pathogen to several hosts within a very short time, overcoming the limitation of low oral susceptibility to DENV infection and thus selecting for DENV with higher fitness (viremia) and associated pathogenic potential.

Transovarial transmission (TOT) has also been suggested as a mechanism of DENV maintenance in both transmission cycles (Figure 1), especially during protracted dry seasons or interepidemic periods. The involvement of TOT in DENV maintenance was demonstrated in nature with the isolation of presumably sylvatic DENV-2 from a pool of Ae. taylori in 1980 in Côte d’Ivoire, and a year later in Senegal from a pool of Ae. furcifer mosquitoes. DENV TOT has also been demonstrated in Ae. aegypti aegypti collected from diverse geographic locations and developmental stages, as well as Ae. albopictus, Ae. mediovittatus, and several members of the Ae. (Stegomyia) scutellaris group, in which they play an important role in DENV transmission in the Indonesian archipelago and Western Pacific islands (Polynesia).

Phylogeny as a Tool to Understand DENV Epidemiology and Evolution

The rapid hyperendemicity of the 4 DENV serotypes in the aftermath of World War II was characterized by rapid radiation, consistent with a pattern of intense diversification (‘boom and bust’ period) followed by lineage extinction (‘pruning’ period) and clade replacement (see Section 6 below). This rapid expansion of diversity coincided with explosive human population growth, uncontrolled urbanization, and massive human movement. While early genetic comparisons relied on RNA fingerprinting to group DENV strains into topotypes (strains sharing similar spatial distribution), direct viral RNA sequencing allowed for greater efficiency as well as precise characterization of DENV strains. This leap in technology allowed Rico-Hesse to delineate the precise evolutionary relationships of DENV-1 and -2 by introducing the term ‘genotype’, defined as the clustering of DENV viruses with nucleotide sequence divergence not greater than 6% within a given genome region. As technology advanced, automated sequencing allowed for the utilization of complete genes or genomes in obtaining more robust and precise phylogenies, often identifying additional topotypes. Recently a concerted sequencing effort led by The Broad Institute in collaboration with a number of international research centers resulted in an exponential increase the deposition of complete genomic sequences into public databases. Although the availability of complete genomic sequences as well as advanced software tools provide a unique window into understanding how intrinsic factors such as selection pressures, evolutionary rates and population dynamics influence DENV evolution, they often exclude a wealth of previously acquired partial genomic sequences. In this review we will attempt to bridge this reality by constructing a phylogenetic history of all available E gene sequences for each of the four dengue serotypes.

DENV-1

Previous studies based on partial, complete E gene or complete genomic sequences recognized five distinct DENV-1 genotypes. Our current analysis, based on the complete E gene sequences of 1812 DENV-1 strains, confirms the previously identified lineages. Additionally our expanded sequence dataset allows for a detailed phylogeographic analysis of DENV-1 (Figure 2).

The identified lineages are grouped in 5 genotypes as follows: (a) genotype I, representing strains from throughout Southeast Asia, China and the Middle East (Saudi Arabia). Within this genotype there are several distinct clades associated with outbreaks sharing specific spatiotemporal associations. Of note are the Malaysia and Singapore outbreaks of 2003 through 2008 that resulted in several spillovers into China, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, as well as a series of Vietnam and China outbreaks sampled between 2001–2003, and 2003–2008 suggesting Cambodia as the major source of DENV-1 outbreaks (Figure 2). Of interest is the 2004 outbreak in China where a combination of human movement and a natural disaster (typhoon Rananim) led to an explosion of mosquito larval development sites, leading to the outbreak’s rapid spread throughout the region. The reality of DENV outbreak initiations via virus introduction from other localities is best exemplified by the near simultaneous outbreaks of DENV-1 in 2001 in Myanmar and several other distant location throughout the Pacific, which were demonstrated to have been caused by strains from 3 different genotypes (Figure 2). (b) genotype II, representing a couple of strains collected in Thailand during the 1950s and 1960s. These strains have not been sampled since, suggesting that either they have become extinct or are circulating at such a low frequency in niche environments to have escaped surveillance. (c) genotype III (sylvatic?), representing what was thought initially to include the only 2 putative sylvatic isolates collected in Malaysia. The sylvatic nature of these isolates has recently been questioned based on discrepancies in topology by analyses performed on E gene or complete genome sequences. The latter analyses do not place the Malaysian canopy DENV-1 isolates in a basal position within this serotype, an observation confirmed by our current analysis of expanded E gene sequences. Therefore, it is possible that these isolates in fact represent spillback events from humans into monkeys rather than true sylvatic isolates. This hypothesis is further supported by the 2005 isolation of human DENV-1 from Malaysia that clusters with the 1972 isolate on the phylogenetic tree (both isolates are depicted in Figure 2 as ‘Malaysia72-05’). Although the authors interpreted this as evidence for the sustained transmission of sylvatic DENV-1 in Malaysia, the fact that both of these strains fall within the mainstream diversity of human DENV-1 suggests that they are ultimately of human origin. (d) genotype IV, representing strains from countries of the Pacific Rim (from Japan, Korea, China, Myanmar, Malaysia and Indonesia), the Western Pacific islands (for example French Polynesia, Nauru, The Philippines and Hawaii), and Australia. Our analysis confirms previous reports that the 2001 DENV-1 outbreak in Hawaii was imported from Tahiti and Samoa, and that the 2004 outbreak in China was introduced by a traveler returning from Thailand. Similarly, DENV-1 strains collected during outbreaks from diverse places such as the Caribbean (1977–1985) and the Indian Ocean island of La Reunion (2003–2006), are also grouped within this genotype, underscoring the rapid spread of DENV through frequent human movement and global trade. Lastly, (e) genotype V represents most DENV-1 strains collected in the Americas, strains from West Africa and Asia. The American strains include those collected from Puerto Rico from 1987–1998 as well as cases imported into the continental USA at the Mexico/Texas border into the Florida Keys (and reviewed in), Central America (Nicaragua, Mexico, Costa-Rica), South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Brasil, Paraguay and Argentina) and the Caribbean. Several sampled in islands of the Indian Ocean archipelago (Comorros, La Reunion and the Seychelles) during DENV-1 outbreaks in 1993 and 2003–2004 and West Africa during the 1960s during the first documented outbreaks in the region are also included.

Overall, the topologies within each DENV-1 genotype are characterized by the basal location of the oldest strains followed by newer isolates, suggesting a pattern of evolution radiating around spatially-defined (geographic) clades.

DENV-2

Although early phylogenetic studies based on partial (prM/E) or complete E gene sequences identified 4 major genotypes, subsequent analysis with an expanded E gene dataset revealed the existence of two additional genotypes with restricted geographic (Asia-only) distribution.

Our current analysis based on a dataset of 1827 complete E gene sequences supports these groupings of six genotypes (Figure 3): (a) Asian genotype I, representing strains from Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Myanmar, Vietnam and Australia. This genotype includes the reference strain 16681, isolated in Thailand in 1964 from a patient with severe dengue disease. Recent studies suggest that the introduction of this genotype into Vietnam from Thailand sometime in the 1990s led to a series of outbreaks and the displacement of the SE Asian/American genotype as the dominant lineage in the region (including Cambodia). This rapid displacement by genotype I was attributed to its fitness advantage (ability to reach higher viremia in humans), leading to an increased rate of human-to-mosquito transmission. (b) Asian genotype II, representing strains from China, Indonesia, The Philippines, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, India, Honduras and Mexico. The Philippine isolates occupy in one clade, which includes two subgroups divided chronologically. The sole Taiwanese isolate represents an imported strain from the Philippines during the 1998 outbreak. This genotype includes the prototype strain New Guinea C (NGC) isolated in 1944. Several strains isolated independently in different parts of the world (for example, Honduras, Mexico, China) are genetically similar to the NGC prototype strain (and reviewed in) (Figure 3). Given the rapid DENV nucleotide substitution rates and the limited genetic diversity among these samples, they most likely represent laboratory contaminations. (c) Southeast (SE) Asian/American genotype. This genotype’s topologies suggest a spatial division into two major subclades: (i) all strains collected from Southeast Asia, and (ii) strains collected in Central and South America and the Caribbean over the last 30 years (Figure 3). The founder of this clade was most likely introduced from Vietnam into Cuba in 1981, with profound public health consequences. This Cuban epidemic was associated for the first time in the Western hemisphere with severe disease. Because of the strength of the Cuban public health infrastructure, although there were several thousand cases of severe dengue disease, the case-fatality rate was low. Nonetheless, during the next 30 years strains of this genotype were responsible for major epidemics with increased pathogenicity throughout the Americas. Because of their increased fitness, these viruses displaced less virulent strains of the American genotype from many regions in the Americas. (d) Cosmopolitan genotype, previously designated as genotype IV, representing strains distributed in a wide geographic area, including East and West Africa, the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent, Indian and Pacific Ocean Islands and Australia. Recently strains of this genotype have been collected in Mexico. As the topologies suggest, there is a spatial subdivision into two subclades (Figure 3): (i) a subclade dominated by strains isolated from the Indian subcontinent, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and the Seychelles. The Indian isolates are represented by strains collected after 1971, whereas all pre-1971 Indian strains were genetically similar to the American genotype (see below). Two clusters of DENV-2 isolated in Saudi Arabia in 1994 are also included, most likely representing two independent introductions into the region by pilgrims from India. A handful of strains from Fiji, Australia, Singapore, Uganda and Malaysia are also included. The latter strains are deeply basal, suggesting a Malaysian origin for this clade. (ii) a subclade that is truly cosmopolitan, characterized by a global distribution with strains sampled as early as 1975 in Indonesia. This subclade is further divided into two distinct groups whose common ancestor appears to have originated in Indonesia (Figure 3). Members of one group appear to have radiated eastward towards East and West Africa, but also westward towards the Torres Strait Islands and Australia. Members of the other group appear to circulate widely in the countries of the Pacific Rim, causing outbreaks in Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Taiwan. (e) American genotype, previously designated as genotype V, representing strains from Central and South America, the Caribbean and older strains collected in the Indian subcontinent and the Pacific Islands. The Indian strains form a distinct lineage within this genotype and include all isolated prior to 1971. This lineage was later replaced by strains of the Cosmopolitan genotype. Isolates of this lineage form 3 distinct subgroups, suggesting that these viruses were introduced at least thrice into India from South America immediately after World War II, a time coinciding with increased movement of ethnic Indians from South America to India and back. Historically, strains of this genotype have been associated with mild DEN, an observation corroborated by experimental data, and thus are considered to have a low epidemiological impact. However, recent analyses indicate that outbreaks of this genotype in the 1970s in Puerto Rico, Tahiti, New Caledonia and Niue included severe dengue disease. Lastly, (f) the sylvatic genotype, representing strains from humans, canopy-dwelling arboreal mosquitoes and non-human primates collected in West Africa and Southeast Asia as recently as two years ago. This genotype is the most genetically distinct and lies basal to all other DENV-2 lineages, supporting the hypothesis that it represents the ancestral genotype. Within this genotype, the Asian strains are genetically distinct from the West African strains. Recent research has demonstrated that sylvatic DENV evolves in a manner similar to that of human DENV, suggesting that the dynamics of mutation, replication, and selection are broadly equivalent for DENV-2 across its host range. This rapid nucleotide substitution rate is evident in the delineated chronologic divide among all pre-1980 isolates, which form a group distinct from all post-1980 isolates (Figure 3). In agreement with the historical record, our analysis has confirmed the oscillating nature of the sylvatic amplification cycles in West Africa, in which silent intervals (lack of virus isolates from mosquitoes) of about 8–10 years in length terminate in abrupt spikes of DENV circulation (as detected in 1966, 1974, 1980–1982, 1989–1990, 1999–2000). Human DENV-2 isolations coinciding with these amplification cycles suggests that sylvatic DENV are not confined into the forest but the have the potential to cause limited spill-overs, even in urban settings. These cases revealed that clinical illness resulting from sylvatic DENV infection can be indistinguishable from classic DF resulting from the human transmission cycle. However, two recent cases from Malaysia and Guinea-Bissau demonstrate that sylvatic DENV infection can also cause severe disease. The latter case is striking given that severe dengue disease is rare in Africa, even during urban transmission of typical human strains.

Overall, there is considerable genetic diversity within the DENV-2 genotypes, reflecting their continual divergence and diverse geographic distribution.

DENV-3

In 1994 Lanciotti delineated for the first time 4 distinct DENV-3 lineages corresponding to 4 distinct genotypes: (a) genotype I, representing strains from southeast Asia, the Philippines and the South Pacific islands; (b) genotype II, representing strains from continental Southeast Asia; (c) genotype III, representing strains that spread across Asia, East Africa and into the Americas; and (d) genotype IV, representing strains from Puerto Rico and Tahiti. Several subsequent DENV-3 phylogenies based on the E gene, partial gene(s) or gene junctions (e.g., C, prM/E, NS3) or complete genome sequences have confirmed these genotypes.

Our current analysis based on complete E gene sequences of 1208 DENV-3 strains available in GenBank confirms in principle the previously identified genotypes, but also allows for greater resolution to delineate the presence of a new genotype (genotype V) as recently suggested. The identified lineages are grouped into 5 genotypes (Figure 4a) as follows: (a) genotype I, representing strains from the maritime areas of Southeast Asia, mainly Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines and Taiwan, and the islands of the South Pacific (e.g., Fiji and Tahiti) (Figure 4a). This genotype includes the majority of isolates from Indonesia from 1973–1983 and 1998–2009, the East Timor outbreaks of 2000–2005, two of the earliest samples collected in Malaysia (1974 and 1981) and a single isolate from Thailand. The single Thai strain within this genotype raises a few questions, namely was its failure to establish itself: (i) a reflection of regional differences in vector competence? (ii) loss in a competition among genotypes? (the predominant circulating DENV-3 genotype in Thailand, is genotype II). (iii) neutralization due to immunity to closely related strains within a pre-exposed human population, which would severely limit the available pool of susceptible hosts to maintain transmission? (iv) sampling bias? (it is quite possible that strains of this genotype have been circulating as minor variants and thus remained undetected). Overall, it appears that genotype I has been evolving independently in Indonesia over the past 30 years and radiating westward reaching French Polynesia, and northward reaching the Philippines and Taiwan, leading to the first recorded cases of DENV-3-induced severe disease there, Tahiti and recently in Brazil. (b) genotype II, representing nearly all strains sampled in Thailand from 1962 until recently in various epidemics (e.g., 1974–1989, 1980–1991, 1988–1991, etc.), a single strain from Singapore collected in 1995 (GenBank accession no. AY766104), one isolate from Indonesia sampled in 1998, Taiwan, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Japan and Myanmar (Figure 4a). In contrast to a recent report by Araujo et al., where the 1962 Thailand isolate was shown to reside near a common ancestral node of genotype II and III, our analysis shows that this isolate is basal within genotype II. Overall it appears that genotype II has been evolving independently in Thailand over the past 50 years, radiating in countries of the continental Southeast Asia with occasional forays (importations) into Taiwan, China, Bangladesh and Norway. (c) genotype III, representing strains from Sri Lanka, India, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Samoa, East Africa, Central and South America, the Caribbean and a couple of imported strains to Europe (Figure 4a). This genotype is the most geographically dispersed of all the DENV-3 genotypes. It appears to have emerged somewhere in the Indian subcontinent (in proximity to Sri Lanka), before spreading westward into Africa sometime in the 1980s and leapfrogging into the Americas a decade later. Although in Figure 4a the African strains appear basal to the contemporaneous Sri Lanka isolates, this topology is not highly supported, as the bootstrap value is low. The earliest documented sampling of genotype III in the Americas was in 1994 in Panama and Nicaragua, but some phylogenetic analyses point to its introduction through Mexico a few years earlier. Whatever the location and time of introduction of this genotype in the Americas might be, it is clear that that these viruses rapidly spread throughout the region by several independent routes of introduction through Central America to the Caribbean and to South America (Figure 4a). The introduction of this genotype into the western hemisphere coincided with explosive epidemics and an increased incidence of severe dengue disease. Strains of this genotype have also radiated eastward as far as Samoa and north as far as Japan, representing importation from Africa. This genotype has also been recently sampled in China, probably imported from the Indian subcontinent. (d) genotype IV, representing strains sampled in Puerto Rico in the early 1960s to late 1970s and in Tahiti. This genotype is the most genetically distinct from all other genotypes of DENV-3 and has only been associated with classic dengue disease. The position of the sampled strains within this genotype corresponds nicely with the epidemiological record. For example, serologic analysis of strains from the 1963 DENV-3 epidemic in Puerto Rico and the 1965 Tahiti epidemic indicated strong similarities, suggesting that viruses responsible for the Tahiti epidemic were introduced from Puerto Rico (Figure 4a). Furthermore, the low pathogenic potential of these strains may be responsible for a silent epidemic in either location. For example, it is believed that the virus was continually circulating in Tahiti for 4 years until another outbreak of DENV-3 took place in 1969. Similar to Puerto Rico, the genetic data indicate strains of the 1963 and 1967 Tahitian epidemics (Figure 4a) are closely related, suggesting that the virus was maintained in a silent transmission. Lastly, (e) genotype V, representing the prototype DENV-3 strain (H87–1956) from the Philippines, includes an 1973 isolate from Japan, strains from China (sampled in 1987 and 2009) and strains from Brazil sampled in the early 2000s. The lineages within this genotype raise an interesting and intriguing question: why strains sampled in Brazil in 2002–2004 and China in 1980 (GenBank accession no. AF317645) and again in 1989 shared very similar sequences with the prototype strain H87 that was isolated nearly 50 years ago in the Philippines (Figure 4b)? Taking into consideration the rapid nucleotide substitution rate that is characteristic of DENV, it is highly likely that these samples represent laboratory contaminations.

Sylvatic DENV-3 are believed to circulate in Southeast Asia based on the seroconversion of sentinel non-human primates. Although no virus isolation has been reported to date, uncorroborated reports suggest that a sylvatic DENV-3 strain may have been isolated in Vietnam in the 1970s.

Overall, DENV-3 evolution is characterized by discrete monophyletic and geographically distinct clusters, suggesting spatially contained population bursts with limited co-circulation of various genotypes and occasional but robust gene flow among geographic regions.

DENV-4

While the seminal work of Lanciotti et al. and Wang et al. identified only 2 genotypes of DENV-4 based on limited E gene sequences, subsequent analyses based on larger datasets delineated 4 major genotypes. Our current analysis, based on 418 E gene sequences sampled from 1956 to 2008, confirmed the existence of 4 genotypes and provided greater resolution than the previously identified topologies. These genotypes include: (a) genotype I, representing strains from The Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, India, and a handful of imported cases in Japan, China and Brazil. This genotype includes the prototype DENV-4 isolate (H241) isolated in the Philippines in 1956. (b) genotype II, representing strains from throughout Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore), China, islands of the Western Pacific Ocean, Australia, the Caribbean and the Americas (Figure 5). Recently, strains of this genotype reached Easter Island. As the topologies suggest, there is a spatiotemporal subdivision into two clades: (i) clade I, represents all strains isolated in the Americas and most Asian strains (Indonesia, New Caledonia, Singapore, Malaysia and Tahiti) collected prior to 2000 (Figure 5). The introduction of this genotype from Southeast Asia in the Americas took place sometime in the early 1980s through the Caribbean, although Carrington suggested introduction through South America. The former hypothesis is further supported by serologic evidence relating these strains to viruses circulating in French Polynesia a year before the onset of the Caribbean epidemics. From the islands of the Lesser Antilles this lineage spread throughout the Caribbean and on to South and Central America (and reviewed in); and (ii) clade II, represented by all but three Asian strains collected after 2000 (Figure 5). Within this clade is a distinct lineage of Malaysian strains that AbuBakar suggested may have emerged through intra-serotypic recombination of two ancestral strains. (c) genotype III, represented by five recent Thai strains isolated between 1997 and 2001, appears to be distinct from all other Thai isolates. Lastly, (d) genotype IV, representing the only three known sylvatic DENV-4 strains isolated from sentinel monkeys in Malaysia during the 1970’s. All sylvatic DENV-4 strains are genetically distinct and basal to the clades I–III that represent strains from the human transmission cycle, supporting the notion that they represent the ancestral genotype.

Overall, the strain topologies within each genotype are characterized by the basal location of the oldest strains followed by newer isolates, suggesting a pattern of evolution radiating around temporal rather than spatial (geographic) clades. Remarkably, among the two major genotypes (I and II) there appears to be limited genetic exchange; genotype I circulates exclusively in Southeast Asia while genotype II has been evolving independently in Southeast Asia and the Americas for the past three decades. This pattern of isolation has been recently confirmed by other investigators.

Basis of Genetic Diversity of DENV

As stated above, phylogenetic and molecular epidemiology data indicate that DENV consist of four distinct serotypes, namely DENV-1, -2, -3, and -4, which differ at levels similar to those between different flavivirus species. Furthermore, each of the serotypes contains a number of genotypes, usually associated with different geographical distributions, and which also contain more detailed genetic infrastructure reflecting the local dispersal of viral strains (shown in Figures 2–5).

The fundamental basis of DENV genetic diversity can be attributed to its error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which does not have proof-reading capacity and is thought to produce approximately one mutation per round of genome replication. Analyses based on selective pressures, represented as the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS), per site suggest that the majority of DENV mutations are deleterious and subject to strong purifying selection (dN/dS << 1). However, genetic variation and population diversity probably allow DENVs to occupy new ecological niches or to adapt to changing niches and selective pressures. Correspondingly, dengue viruses evolve in a rate around or just below 1 × 10−3 subs/site/year, to some extent lower than many acutely infecting RNA viruses that are directly transmitted between vertebrate hosts, indicating that DENV may be subjected to stronger evolutionary constraints than the latter.

Another major way of introducing genetic diversity into viral populations is through migration. As discussed above, DENVs have been hyperendemic in Southeast Asia since the 1950s, facilitated by the spread of their mosquito vector, the massive movement of troops and human populations during World War II, as well as uncontrolled urbanization, lack of basic infrastructure and deforestation. In the Americas, the cancellation of the vector eradication programs in the 1970s facilitated dengue re-emergence in various regions of Central and South America through the re-introduction and re-colonization of the primary domestic vector Ae. aegypti aegypti. As a consequence, between the 1980s and 1990s many Latin American countries evolved from non-endemic (no virus present) or hypo-endemic (one serotype circulation) to hyperendemic. Indeed, growing evidence indicates that DENV gene flow is a common phenomenon and occurs on various scales. Serotypes and genotypes can be introduced into broad geographical areas where genetically distant strains are already endemic, dramatically increase the genetic diversity and leading to larger fitness variations. In addition to innate viral factors, cross-immunity and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) put the fitness of invading strain on a more complicated landscape.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the increased host/vector population sizes and densities themselves may help to maintain DENV genetic diversity by increasing the transmission rate and therefore the total viral population size and amount of replication. A large population size not only directly provides the space for larger population diversity, but also reduces the diversity loss due to stochastic events.

Finally, although clonal evolution (i.e., the accumulation of mutational changes) has been presumed as the major foundation of DENV evolution, homologous recombination has been suggested as a potentially important factor in increasing genetic diversity in viral population. Indeed, the frequent co-circulation of different serotypes and/or genotypes in one region (see below), together with the fact that Ae. aegypti aegypti often engorges multiple times on different hosts, makes co-infection of genetically distant DENV strains possible in both mosquito and human hosts. Consequently, concurrent human infection by two or more DENV serotypes appears to be a common occurrence and putative recombinants have been detected within a single mosquito. Several reports have suggested that intra-serotype recombination occurs in all DENV serotypes in different geographical regions. Furthermore, the putative evidence of intra-serotypic recombination amongst DENV-4 from independent ancestral lineages (most likely Indonesia 1976 and Malaysia 1969) may have contributed to the emergence of a distinct genotype, representing all Malaysian strains. In contrast, no recombination between serotypes has been detected, suggesting that molecular mechanisms may prevent such event.

However, despite of many reports of putative recombinant DENV strains, no solid evidence has been obtained to attribute the emergence of strains to recombination. In other words, if recombination does occur, it usually confers no significant selective advantage. With the dramatic increase of the amount of sequence data deposited in GenBank through the collaborative effort of the Broad Institute with a variety of international research centers, detection of the frequency of recombination may be evaluated more accurately. However, extreme caution should be exercised when detecting putative recombination events. To date all reported recombination events among flaviviruses have been detected through phylogenetic methods, such as bootscanning. For natural recombination to lead to transmission, three conditions must be met: (a) the recombinant crossover should be demonstrated in a single PCR amplicon following cloning to ensure that it occurs in a single cDNA molecule; (b) the recombination should be demonstrated repeatedly in clonal populations of viable virus (for example, in plaque harvests or limited endpoint dilution isolates); and (c) the recombinant should be stably maintained during post-recombination evolution.

Dengue Evolution is Characterized by Frequent Lineage Replacement

The evolution of DENV has been associated with its global expansion in the last half of the 20th Century, due to the global spread of the anthropophilic vector Ae. aegypti aegypti, the increase of the human population size, uncontrolled urbanization, and expansion of international commerce and travel. At local levels, phylogenetic analyses based on longitudinal data have suggested a continuous clade turnover process (although not as striking as in Influenza viruses) whereby individual lineages or entire clades of viruses frequently arise, persist for a period of time, and then disappear. Replacement can occur along a single lineage, as is reflected by the ladder-like topology on the phylogenetic tree, due to the regular bottlenecks in viral population size associated with the seasonal fluctuation of vector population size and density, purifying selection, which removes all viral strains containing deleterious or slightly deleterious mutations, or selective sweeps. Often, a clade can disappear after circulating in a particular area for several years and be replaced by a new clade sometimes associated with an epidemic outbreak. Related to this clade replacement, co-circulation of different viral strains (including serotype, genotype, or group of viruses within a genotype) is often observed, although with various spatiotemporal associations (see Sections 6.2–6.4 below). Unclear are the detailed mechanisms which lead to clade replacement and which determine the fate of the introduced strains.

The Role of Selection Pressures on Shaping the Evolution and Population Dynamics of DENV

One of the central questions in DENV evolution is how much effect natural selection imposes on its evolutionary dynamics? Theoretically, viral strains with higher virulence (if accompanied with higher and longer in duration viremia leading to greater chance of a mosquito getting infected) and transmission rates from the host, higher infection and dissemination rates in the mosquito vectors, or different antigenicity from previous circulating strains, will be favored by natural selection. Despite the evidence that DENVs are generally under strong purifying selection, a few putatively positively selected codons have been detected phylogenetically in several genes (E, NS2A, NS2B, NS4B, and NS5). Positively selected codons in the E gene are located either in T- or B-cell epitopes, indicating they are likely involved in escaping the host adaptive immunity, or in regions that affect membrane fusion. However, selective pressures acting on different serotypes or genotypes can differ. For example, the Cosmopolitan genotype of DENV-2 exhibits an elevated dN/dS value compared to other genotypes, suggesting adaptation during its global spread. Of specific interest is codon E-390, previously identified as a key virulence determinant that could play a role in viral pathogenicity and/or transmissibility due to its location within the distal face of domain III, a region associated with attachment to host cells. Furthermore, the estimation of positively selected codons often varies because it is a function of the spatial and temporal composition of the sample sets, suggesting that selection pressure varies in different ecological environments, and often acts on a local scale. For example, a study of DENV-4 evolution over 20 years in Puerto Rico indicated that positive selection (supported by high dN/dS values and rapid fixation rates) on NS2A, can at least partially be contributed to lineage turnover. Similarly, positively selected sites on the E gene, which encodes proteins on the viral surface that enable host-cell binding and entry and also provide the primary target for host immune responses, may explain, at least in part, the fixation of the SE Asian/American genotype of DENV-2 in Puerto Rico.

Additional experimental lines of evidence have illustrated that fitness variation does exist between different genotypes and even among strains belonging to a single genotype. For example, the Southeast Asian genotype of DENV-2, which was introduced to the Americas in the late 1970s, has effectively replaced the American genotype due to its higher infectivity for Ae. aegypti aegypti and higher viral output in the humans. Similar observations were observed in the Asian 1 lineage of DENV-2, which have entirely displaced the previously dominant Asian lineage in Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia. A selective sweep is supported by the significantly higher plasma viraemia levels in pediatric patients, which probably leads to more efficient human-to-mosquito transmission.

However, although small differences in viral fitness can explain the rapid expansion and fitness of a novel genotype, modeling work suggests that the fate of an introduced strain, even with slight fitness advantage, is ultimately determined by the epidemiological landscape (a combination of factors such as density of mosquito vector population, fluctuation of biting frequency, and a period of cross-immunity, etc.) in which it arose.

Cross-Immunity as a Driving Force for DENV Evolution

Several phylogenetic studies have explored the traces of positive selection imposed by the cross-immunity by different serotypes on the evolution of DENVs. It has been suggested that rapid transmission of DENV populations occurring during concurrent serotype outbreaks may give rise to serologic-escape mutants due to the presence of cross-immunologic pressures. For example, during the 2001 outbreak of DENV-1 in Myanmar, which followed the 1998 outbreak caused by the co-circulation of all four DENV serotypes, six of the eight amino acid substitutions that distinguished the post-1998 DENV-1 strains, as well as all other strains of co-circulating DENV-2, -3, and -4 lineages, were localized in the E protein. This suggested that the presence of strong selective pressures imposed on the circulating DENV-1 strains by cross-reactive antibodies produced against the co-circulating DENV-2, -3, or -4 facilitated their immunologic escape from the strong herd immunity shortly after the 1998 outbreak. The interaction of co-circulating serotypes may also facilitate the intra-serotypic clade replacement. A longitudinal study over a 30-year span in Thailand revealed an inverse correlation between prevalence of DENV-1 and DENV-4. Increase of prevalence of DENV-1 was often accompanied by an increase in its clade diversity, whereas clade replacements by genotype often occurred with a decline of that serotype, possibly due to their differential susceptibility to cross-reactive immune response ilicited by other serotypes. This observation is further supported by epidemiological models in Thailand, suggesting that moderate cross-protective immunity gives rise to persistent out-of-phase oscillations, as shown by DENV-4 circulation during interepidemic years. However, strong or weak cross-protection or cross-enhancement only produces in-phase patterns, as shown by the long-term co-circulation of DENV-1, -2, and -3.

Stochastic Events Play an Important Role in Clade Replacement

The indications of purifying selection (dN/dS << 1) in phylogenetic studies along with sporadic occurrences of positive selection as the major selective pressure acting upon DENV genomes, the co-circulation of different genotypes, rather than immediate replacement after introduction, highlight the importance of environmental and immunological factors than viral factors in determining the occurrence of clade replacement. Possible population bottlenecks between epidemics, as observed during the inter-epidemic periods of 1980 and 1987 in Bangkok, was also proposed as a possible mechanism based on the observation of the low level of fixed amino acid and nucleotide changes in E gene between samples surveyed from the two adjacent epidemics. Similarly, the replacement of the pre-1992 lineage of DENV-3 in Thailand by a local, rather than an introduced strain during the inter-epidemic period was attributed to stochastic events occurring during population bottlenecks. More recently, a comprehensive study examining DENV-1 clade replacement in Myanmar, where a long-circulated lineage (genotype III) went extinct following the introduction of two new clades (genotype I) in 1996–1998, suggested that positive selection was not responsible for the extinction of genotype III virus. Rather, it was due to a stochastic event attributable to the low rate of virus transmission during an inter-epidemic period.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Its Effect on DENV Evolution

Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is a proposed biological mechanism that influences the uptake of DENV by target cells of infection, whereby DENV replication is increased rather than decreased by humoral immunity derived from a previous DENV infection, and has been suggested as one of the mechanisms responsible for severe dengue disease. The generation of non-cross-neutralizing antibodies raised against a primary DENV infection leads to the formation of infectious virus-antibody complexes upon a heterotypic DENV infection, which bind to the Fc receptors on the surface of mononuclear phagocytes and facilitate the uptake and replication of viruses. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that non-neutralizing antibodies from a previous, heterotypic DENV infection enhance the replication of DENV (enhancement of infection) in rhesus monkeys and humans. In theory, ADE may lead to an increased cell susceptibility (enhanced uptake by macrophages), transmissibility (increased viremia), and mortality (severe dengue disease). The roles of these factors in shaping the evolution and population dynamics of DENV have been discussed in many mathematical modeling studies. Using a dynamic system model of co-circulating dengue serotypes, Cummings et al. suggested that ADE could provide a competitive advantage to those serotypes that undergo enhancement compared to those that do not, and that this advantage increases with increasing numbers of co-circulating serotypes. However, the role of ADE may be limited due to the observation that greater levels of enhancement induce large amplitude oscillations in incidence of all dengue virus infections, threatening the persistence of both the enhanced and non-enhanced serotypes.

ADE is also thought to be responsible for the large immunological distance between dengue serotypes. Assuming that cross-enhancement acts by increasing the transmission rate of secondary infections, Ferguson et al. show that ADE can result in periodic or chaotic coexistence of two pathogen strains. But this model fails to make the connection between ADE and immunological distance, as immunity and enhancement were represented by the same parameter. In an alternative model, Kawaguchi et al. assume that increased mortality is the main effect of ADE, and the interplay between ADE and cross-immunity can explain the co-circulating pattern of genetically and immunologically distinct serotypes. However, this model is thought to have used unrealistic parameters, which do not fit the epidemiology and immunology of DENV. To overcome these shortcomings and to clarify the effects of ADE, Adams and Boots incorporated parameters of enhancement in susceptibility, transmissibility and mortality separately and confirmed their results for reasonable levels of susceptibility and transmission enhancement but not for mortality enhancement. The authors also showed that when the two strains have identical basic reproductive rates, no form of enhancement can lead to competitive exclusion. When strains differ in basic reproductive numbers, susceptibility or transmission enhancement allows strains with greater immunological similarity to stably coexist but mortality enhancement forces the strains to be more distinct.

DENV Evolutionary Rates and Their Constraints

To date, several studies that have examined DENV evolutionary rates, mostly by measuring their substitution rates based on the E gene, have suggested broadly similar rates from 4.6–11.6 × 10−4 subs/site/year, for different serotypes, genotypes and transmission cycles. These rates are similar to those of many other vector-borne viruses, but in general lower than other acutely infecting RNA viruses that are transmitted directly among vertebrates (usually on the order of ×10−3 such as Influenza viruses). These relatively low evolutionary rates, together with the low dN/dS values observed on DENV evolution, suggests that DENV may be subjected to certain additional functional or ecological constraints.

The most common idea is that vector-borne viruses are subjected to fitness trade-offs due to their alternating infections between invertebrate and vertebrate hosts. In theory, adaptations to different habitats or hosts are antagonistic; alleles beneficial in one host impair fitness in others. Hence, different selection pressures between vector and primate host may impose additional constraints on vector-borne viruses compared to those transmitted only among vertebrates. Freeing arboviruses from alternating host infections by serial passage in vitro or in vivo consistently leads to an increased fitness in the adaptive cell line or host/vector. Shared mutations in the same position from independent passage series suggested convergent evolution via positive selection during adaptation. Confounding results, however, are observed in the fitness change in the bypassed cell line or hosts, as well as in alternate passages. First, despite the fact that most of the studies suggested a fitness loss in the bypassed cell line after serial passage in a single cell line, some studies on vescicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) did not find evidence of fitness trade-offs for the bypassed host. Second, with the exception of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), all other experimental studies did not observe fitness constraints imposed by alternating passages. In contrast, most of the studies (as mentioned above) suggested that alternating passages increase the viral fitness on both cell lines, in a level similar to the fitness change after serial passages in the specific cell line. The phenotypic change, however, may not be paralleled by genomic changes. It was observed that single host cell passage resulted in the accumulation of more mutations than alternating cell passages without causing obvious fitness deviation, suggesting that constraints in evolutionary rates do not necessarily correspond to constraints in fitness. Furthermore, despite the fitness increase, few mutations (if any) were observed based on consensus sequences, suggesting that fitness increases were mediated by minority genomes in the mutant spectrum. To further examine this idea, Coffey et al. measured the genetic diversity after serial or alternating passage and its relationship with fitness change and adaptability to novel selective pressures. The results suggested that alternately passaged Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is associated with greatest fitness increases without drastic changes in genetic diversity, whereas serial passage led to greater increase in genetic diversity, indicating an evolutionary trade-off between maintaining fitness for invertebrate and vertebrate cell cycling. Lastly, these results also provided evidence for a positive correlation between genetic diversity and adaptability to new environment, indicating the role of mutations in minority genomes in the exploration of genetic space and corresponding fitness space in novel selective pressure.

Alternatively, but not mutually exclusively, the observed genetic stability of arboviruses could be attributed to the persistent infection in vectors, where the RNA interference mechanism suppresses viral replication. Experimental studies have provided evidence that mosquito cells place more constraints on the evolution of arboviruses than vertebrate cells. In a study by Chen et al., no mutation was observed on the E/NS1 portion of DENV-2 genome after serial passage (20 or 30 times) on C6/36 cells, compared to 4 nucleotide substitutions corresponding to 3 amino acid changes after 30 passages on Vero cells and 1 amino acid change following alternating passages between Vero and C6/36 cells. In a more comprehensive study, Vasilakis et al., utilizing both cloned and uncloned DENV, examined whether alternating human-to-mosquito transmission may constrain DENV evolution by imposing constraints on replication in either host, if fitness trade-offs occur. The experimental observations suggested that DENV that were specialized in single host cells (either Huh-7, a human hepatocarcinoma cell line or C6/36, a mosquito cell line), exhibited fitness gains. However, fitness losses were observed in the bypassed cells, and surprisingly viruses passaged in alternating cycles between Huh-7 and C6/36 cells exhibited detectable fitness gains in both cell lines. Moreover, several amino acid changes were observed that were common in both vertebrate and invertebrate cell line passage series suggesting convergent evolution via positive selection. Although these observations support the hypothesis that release of arbovirus from its alternating vector-host transmission cycle will lead to the acquisition of fitness gains for retained vertebrate or invertebrate host, there was limited support to the notion that arboviruses, including DENV, will adopt a fitness compromise. Moreover, a key observation of this study was that DENV specialization in the vertebrate or alternating host cells facilitated the emergence of a qualitatively and quantitatively different mutation spectrum than exclusive passage in the invertebrate host cell line, supporting the notion that positive selection occurs within the vertebrate host.

Lastly, deriving inferences on the impact of host alternation on arbovirus evolution must take under consideration their inherent properties. Specifically, because of the infidelity of their RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp), arboviruses exist as a swarm of intrahost genetic variants (loosely referred to as ‘quasispecies’). An inherent limitation of most of the studies described so far is the utilization of consensus sequences to monitor the evolution of viral populations, which in reality only reflect the majority nucleotide at any given position of the viral genome and not the spectrum of mutations present. Thus, minority mutant populations that may be characteristic of the RNA virus ensemble can be masked. Utilizing consensus sequences obtained by the amplification and sequencing of RT-PCR amplicons excludes other present mutations (albeit at lower frequencies) from detection that may also play a role in arbovirus evolution. Further support has been demonstrated in recent studies suggesting that the diversity of the intrahost genetic variants can differ in vertebrate hosts and invertebrate vectors, and that these differences can affect viral virulence. Thus, future studies examining the evolution of intrahost genetic variant diversity should capitalize on the continued advances in the efficiency, speed and cost of next generation DNA sequencing that can efficiently sequence simultaneously a large number of RNA viral genomes.

Conclusions

The human DEN serotypes evolved independently from progenitor sylvatic DENV of each serotype, in a series of parallel divergence events occurring after the establishment of sufficiently large urban populations in the Asia-Oceania region capable to support a human transmission cycle. Consequently, DEN is not new to humanity; it has simply been ushered into our consiousness by the escalation of the global DEN pandemic during the past 60 or so years. This escalation is attributed to human behavior (uncontrolled urbanization, population movement, unsustainable vector control), ecologic (global invasion of the major mosquito vectors) and viral (interaction and evolution of the four serotypes) factors, that have ultimately led to increased viral genetic diversity and disease severity. Understanding the forces that shape DENV evolution and the extent these forces play in the observed shifts to higher virulence in human infections is important in developing effective countermeasures, especially in the absence of a licensed vaccine or antiviral therapies to control the spread of a DENV pandemic.

References 352

  1. 1.

    Calisher CH, Karabatsos N, Dalrymple JM, Shope RE, Porterfield JS, Westaway EG, Brandt WE. Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol. 1989;70:37-43.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-70-1-37

  2. 2.

    Rudnick A. Dengue virus ecology in Malaysia. Inst Med Res Malays Bull. 1986;23:51-152.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Cornet M, Saluzzo JF, Hervy JP, Digoutte JP, Germain M, Chauvancy MF, Eyraud M, Ferrara L, Heme G, Legros F. Dengue 2 au Senegal oriental: Une poussee epizootique en milieu selvatique; isolements du virus a partir des moustiques et d'un singe et considerations epidemiologiques. Cah ORSTOM ser Ent Med et Parasitol. 1984;22:313-323.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    de Thoisy B, Dussart P, Kazanji M. Wild terrestrial rainforest mammals as potential reservoirs for flaviviruses (yellow fever, dengue 2 and St Louis encephalitis viruses) in French Guiana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:409-412.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.12.003

  5. 5.

    de Thoisy B, Lacoste V, Germain A, Munoz-Jordan J, Colon C, Mauffrey JF, Delaval M, Catzeflis F, Kazanji M, Matheus S, et al. Dengue infection in neotropical forest mammals. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009;9:157-170.

    Not in our library10.1089/vbz.2007.0280

  6. 6.

    Rodhain F. The role of monkeys in the biology of dengue and yellow fever. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991;14:9-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/0147-9571(91)90036-d

  7. 7.

    Gubler DJ, Gubler DJ, Kuno G. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: Its history and resurgence as a global public health problem. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. 1997;1-22.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Hunsperger E, Kroeger A, Margolis HS, Martinez E, et al. Dengue: A continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:S7-S16.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2460

  9. 9.

    Natiello M, Ritacco V, Morales MA, Deodato B, Picollo M, Dinerstein E, Enria D. Indigenous dengue fever, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1498-1499.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1409.080143

  10. 10.

    CDC. Locally acquired dengue—Key West, Florida, 2009–2010. MMWR. 2010;59:577-581.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Kyle JL, Harris E. Global spread and persistence of dengue. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:71-92.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.163005

  12. 12.

    Kalayanarooj S, Nimmannitya S. Clinical presentations of dengue hemorrhagic fever in infants compared to children. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2003;86:S673-S680.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Kongsomboon K, Singhasivanon P, Kaewkungwal J, Nimmannitya S, Mammen MP, Nisalak A, Sawanpanyalert P. Temporal trends of dengue fever/dengue hemorrhagic fever in Bangkok, Thailand from 1981 to 2000: An age-period-cohort analysis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2004;35:913-917.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Witayathawornwong P. DHF in infants, late infants and older children: A comparative study. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2005;36:896-900.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Guilarde AO, Turchi MD, Siqueira JB, Feres VC, Rocha B, Levi JE, Souza VA, Boas LS, Pannuti CS, Martelli CM. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever among adults: Clinical outcomes related to viremia, serotypes, and antibody response. J Infect Dis. 2008;197-824.

    Not in our library10.1086/528805

  16. 16.

    Hanafusa S, Chanyasanha C, Sujirarat D, Khuankhunsathid I, Yaguchi A, Suzuki T. Clinical features and differences between child and adult dengue infections in Rayong province, southeast Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2008;39:252-259.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Koh BK, Ng LC, Kita Y, Tang CS, Ang LW, Wong KY, James L, Goh KT. The 2005 dengue epidemic in Singapore: Epidemiology, prevention and control. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37:538-545.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Lee IK, Liu JW, Yang KD. Clinical and laboratory characteristics and risk factors for fatality in elderly patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:149-153.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.
    Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, Brazil, 1981–2002 · 2005
    No notice
  20. 20.

    Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K, Sukthana Y, Pukrittayakamee S. Risk factors and clinical features associated with severe dengue infection in adults and children during the 2001 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:1022-1029.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01295.x

  21. 21.
    Confirmed adult dengue deaths in Singapore: 5-year multi-center retrospective study · 2011
    Not checked
  22. 22.

    Fox A, Le NM, Simmons CP, Wolbers M, Wertheim HF, Pham TK, Tran TH, Trinh TM, Nguyen TL, Nguyen VT, et al. Immunological and viral determinants of dengue severity in hospitalized adults in Ha Noi, Viet Nam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e967.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000967

  23. 23.

    Tee HP, How SH, Jamalludin AR, Safhan MN, Sapian MM, Kuan YC, Sapari S. Risk factors associated with development of dengue haemorrhagic fever or dengue shock syndrome in adults in hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan. Med J Malaysia. 2009;64:316-320.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Halstead SB, Nimmannitya S, Cohen SN. Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. IV. Relation of disease severity to antibody response and virus recovered. Yale J Biol Med. 1970;42:311-328.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Kliks SC, Nimmanitya S, Nisalak A, Burke DS. Evidence that maternal dengue antibodies are important in the development of dengue hemorrhagic fever in infants. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38:411-419.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.411

  26. 26.

    Dejnirattisai W, Jumnainsong A, Onsirisakul N, Fitton P, Vasanawathana S, Limpitikul W, Puttikhunt C, Edwards C, Duangchinda T, Supasa S, Chawansuntati K, Malasit P, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton G. Cross-reacting antibodies enhance dengue virus infection in humans. Science. 2010;328:745-748.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1185181

  27. 27.

    Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Suntayakorn S, Endy TP, Raengsakulrach B, Rothman AL, Ennis FA, Nisalak A. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:2-9.

    Not in our library10.1086/315215

  28. 28.

    Wang WK, Chao DY, Kao CL, Wu HC, Liu YC, Li CM, Lin SC, Ho ST, Huang JH, King CC. High levels of plasma dengue viral load during defervescence in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever: Implications for pathogenesis. Virology. 2003;305:330-338.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.2002.1704

  29. 29.

    Araujo JM, de Filippis AM, Schatzmayr HG, de Araujo ES, Britto C, Cardoso MA, Camacho LA, Nogueira RM. Quantification of dengue virus type 3 RNA in fatal and non-fatal cases in Brazil, 2002. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:952-954.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.01.025

  30. 30.
    Epidemiological Factors Associated with Dengue Shock Syndrome and Mortality in Hospitalized Dengue Patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam · 2011
    No notice
  31. 31.

    Guzman MG, Kouri G, Morier L, Soler M, Fernandez A. A study of fatal hemorrhagic dengue cases in Cuba, 1981. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1984;18:213-220.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Kalayanarooj S, Nimmannitya S. Is dengue severity related to nutritional status? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2005;36:378-384.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Thisyakorn U, Nimmannitya S. Nutritional status of children with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:295-297.

    Not in our library10.1093/clind/16.2.295

  34. 34.

    Bravo JR, Guzman MG, Kouri GP. Why dengue haemorrhagic fever in Cuba? 1. Individual risk factors for dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81:816-820.

    Not in our library10.1016/0035-9203(87)90041-1

  35. 35.

    Nguyen TP, Kikuchi M, Vu TQ, Do QH, Tran TT, Vo DT, Ha MT, Vo VT, Cao TP, Tran VD, et al. Protective and enhancing HLA alleles, HLA-DRB1*0901 and HLA-A*24, for severe forms of dengue virus infection, dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e304.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000304

  36. 36.

    Appanna R, Ponnampalavanar S, Lum Chai See L, Sekaran SD. Susceptible and protective HLA class 1 alleles against dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever patients in a Malaysian population. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13029.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0013029

  37. 37.
    Health Economics of Dengue: A Systematic Literature Review and Expert Panel's Assessment · 2011
    No notice
  38. 38.

    Beaute J, Vong S. Cost and disease burden of dengue in Cambodia. BMC Publ Health. 2010;10:521.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-10-521

  39. 39.

    Luz PM, Grinsztejn B, Galvani AP. Disability adjusted life years lost to dengue in Brazil. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:237-246.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02203.x

  40. 40.

    Anderson KB, Chunsuttiwat S, Nisalak A, Mammen MP, Libraty DH, Rothman AL, Green S, Vaughn DW, Ennis FA, Endy TP. Burden of symptomatic dengue infection in children at primary school in Thailand: A prospective study. Lancet. 2007;369:1452-1459.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60671-0

  41. 41.

    Cho Min N. Assessment of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Myanmar. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2000;31:636-641.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Meltzer MI, Rigau-Perez JG, Clark GG, Reiter P, Gubler DJ. Using disability-adjusted life years to assess the economic impact of dengue in Puerto Rico: 1984–1994. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:265-271.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.265

  43. 43.

    Gubler DJ, Meltzer M. Impact of dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever on the developing world. Adv Virus Res. 1999;53:35-70.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60342-5

  44. 44.

    Clark DV, Mammen MP, Nisalak A, Puthimethee V, Endy TP. Economic impact of dengue fever/dengue hemorrhagic fever in Thailand at the family and population levels. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:786-791.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Garg P, Nagpal J, Khairnar P, Seneviratne SL. Economic burden of dengue infections in India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:570-577.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.02.015

  46. 46.
    Economic Impact of Dengue Illness in the Americas · 2011
    No notice
  47. 47.

    Huy R, Wichmann O, Beatty M, Ngan C, Duong S, Margolis HS, Vong S. Cost of dengue and other febrile illnesses to households in rural Cambodia: A prospective community-based case-control study. BMC Publ Health. 2009;9:155.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-9-155

  48. 48.

    Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Siqueira JB, Martelli CT, Lum LC, Tan LH, Kongsin S, Jiamton S, Garrido F, Montoya R, et al. Cost of dengue cases in eight countries in the Americas and Asia: A prospective study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:846-855.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    Armien B, Suaya JA, Quiroz E, Sah BK, Bayard V, Marchena L, Campos C, Shepard DS. Clinical characteristics and national economic cost of the 2005 dengue epidemic in Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:364-371.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Harving ML, Ronsholt FF. The economic impact of dengue hemorrhagic fever on family level in southern Vietnam. Danish Med Bull. 2007;54:170-172.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    Anez G, Balza R, Valero N, Larreal Y. Economic impact of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in the state of Zulia, Venezuela, 1997–2003. Rev Panamericana Salud Publ. 2006;19:314-320.

    Not in our library10.1590/s1020-49892006000500004

  52. 52.

    Valdes LG, Mizhrahi JV, Guzman MG. Economic impact of dengue 2 epidemic in Santiago de Cuba, 1997. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2002;54:220-227.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Leung A, Kilple KF. Diseases of the premodern period in china. The Cambridge World History of Human Disease. 1993;354-361.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    Bylon D. Korte aantekening, wegens eene algemeene ziekte, doorgaans genaamd de knokkelkoorts. Verhandelungen van het bataviaasch genootschop der konsten in wetenschappen. 1780;17-30.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    Christie J. On epidemics of dengue fever: Their diffusion and etiology. Glasgow Med J. 1881;16:161-176.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Hirsch A. Dengue, a comparatively new desease: Its symptoms. Handbook of geographical and historical pathology. 1883;I:55-81.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Rush AB. An account of the bilious remitting fever, as it appeared in Philadelphia in the summer and autumn of the year 1780. Medical Inquiries and Observations. 1789;89-100.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Vasilakis N, Weaver SC. The history and evolution of human dengue emergence. Adv Vir Res. 2008;72:1-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-3527(08)00401-6

  59. 59.

    Pepper P. A note on David Bylon and dengue. Ann Med Hist. 1941;3:363-368.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Carey DE. Chikungunya and dengue: A case of mistaken identity? J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1971;26:243-262.

    Not in our library10.1093/jhmas/xxvi.3.243

  61. 61.

    Simmons JS, St John JH, Reynolds FHK. Experimental studies of dengue. Philippine J Sci. 1931;44:1-252.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Rico-Hesse R. Molecular evolution and distribution of dengue viruses type 1 and 2 in nature. Virology. 1990;174:479-493.

    Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(90)90102-w

  63. 63.

    Wang E, Ni H, Xu R, Barrett AD, Watowich SJ, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC. Evolutionary relationships of endemic/epidemic and sylvatic dengue viruses. J Virol. 2000;74:3227-3234.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.74.7.3227-3234.2000

  64. 64.

    Vasilakis N, Hanley KA, Weaver SC, Hanley KA, Weaver SC. Dengue virus emergence from its sylvatic cycle. Frontiers in Dengue Virus Research. 2010;183-220.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Twiddy SS, Farrar JJ, Vinh Chau N, Wills B, Gould EA, Gritsun T, Lloyd G, Holmes EC. Phylogenetic relationships and differential selection pressures among genotypes of dengue-2 virus. Virology. 2002;298:63-72.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.2002.1447

  66. 66.

    Twiddy SS, Woelk CH, Holmes EC. Phylogenetic evidence for adaptive evolution of dengue viruses in nature. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:1679-1689.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-83-7-1679

  67. 67.

    Twiddy SS, Holmes EC, Rambaut A. Inferring the rate and time-scale of dengue virus evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:122-129.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msg010

  68. 68.

    Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2003;3:19-28.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1567-1348(03)00004-2

  69. 69.

    Araujo JM, Nogueira RM, Schatzmayr HG, Zanotto PM, Bello G. Phylogeography and evolutionary history of dengue virus type 3. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:716-725.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2008.10.005

  70. 70.

    Villabona-Arenas CJ, Zanotto PM. Evolutionary history of dengue virus type 4: Insights into genotype phylodynamics. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:878-885.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2011.02.007

  71. 71.

    Dunham EJ, Holmes EC. Inferring the timescale of dengue virus evolution under realistic models of DNA substitution. J Mol Evol. 2007;64:656-661.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00239-006-0278-5

  72. 72.

    Zanotto PM, Gould EA, Gao GF, Harvey PH, Holmes EC. Population dynamics of flaviviruses revealed by molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:548-553.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.2.548

  73. 73.

    Vasilakis N, Durbin A, Travassos da Rosa APA, Munoz-Jordan JL, Tesh RB, Weaver SC. Antigenic relationships between sylvatic and endemic dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:128-132.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    Sabin AB. Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1952;1:30-50.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1952.1.30

  75. 75.

    Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM. Transmission dynamics and epidemiology of dengue: Insights from age-stratified sero-prevalence surveys. Phil Trans R Soc London. 1999;354:757-768.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.1999.0428

  76. 76.
    The effect of antibody-dependent enhancement on the transmission dynamics and persistence of multiple-strain pathogens · 1999
    Not checked
  77. 77.

    Cologna R, Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. Selection for virulent dengue viruses occurs in humans and mosquitoes. J Virol. 2005;79:853-859.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.2.853-859.2005

  78. 78.

    Cologna R, Rico-Hesse R. American genotype structures decrease dengue virus output from human monocytes and dendritic cells. J Virol. 2003;77:3929-3938.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.77.7.3929-3938.2003

  79. 79.

    Cummings DA, Irizarry RA, Huang NE, Endy TP, Nisalak A, Ungchusak K, Burke DS. Travelling waves in the occurrence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand. Nature. 2004;427:344-347.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02225

  80. 80.

    Billings L, Schwartz IB, Shaw LB, McCrary M, Burke DS, Cummings DA. Instabilities in multiserotype disease models with antibody-dependent enhancement. J Theor Biol. 2007;246:18-27.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.023

  81. 81.

    Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. Efficiency of dengue serotype 2 virus strains to infect and disseminate in Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:539-544.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.2003.68.539

  82. 82.

    Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. Differential susceptibility of Aedes aegypti to infection by the American and southeast Asian genotypes of dengue type 2 virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1:159-168.

    Not in our library10.1089/153036601316977769

  83. 83.
    Emergence and Global Spread of a Dengue Serotype 3, Subtype III Virus · 2003
    No notice
  84. 84.

    Gaunt MW, Sall AA, de Lamballerie X, Falconar AK, Dzhivanian TI, Gould EA. Phylogenetic relationships of flaviviruses correlate with their epidemiology, disease association and biogeography. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:1867-1876.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-82-8-1867

  85. 85.

    Smith CE. The history of dengue in tropical Asia and its probable relationship to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Trop Med Hyg. 1956;59:243-251.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.
    Out of Africa: A Molecular Perspective on the Introduction of Yellow Fever Virus into the Americas · 2007
    No notice
  87. 87.

    Vasconcelos PF, Costa ZG, Travassos Da Rosa ES, Luna E, Rodrigues SG, Barros VL, Dias JP, Monteiro HA, Oliva OF, Vasconcelos HB, et al. Epidemic of jungle yellow fever in Brazil, 2000: Implications of climatic alterations in disease spread. J Med Virol. 2001;65:598-604.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    Vasconcelos PF, Rodrigues SG, Degallier N, Moraes MA, da Rosa JF, da Rosa ES, Mondet B, Barros VL, da Rosa AP. An epidemic of sylvatic yellow fever in the southeast region of Maranhao state, Brazil, 1993–1994: Epidemiologic and entomologic findings. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:132-137.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.132

  89. 89.

    Tabachnick WJ, Powell JR. A world-wide survey of genetic variation in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. Genet Res. 1979;34:215-229.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672300019467

  90. 90.

    Powell JR, Tabachnick WJ, Arnold J. Genetics and the origin of a vector population: Aedes aegypti, a case study. Science. 1980;208:1385-1387.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.7375945

  91. 91.

    Diallo M, Sall AA, Moncayo AC, Ba Y, Fernandez Z, Ortiz D, Coffey LL, Mathiot C, Tesh RB, Weaver SC. Potential role of sylvatic and domestic african mosquito species in dengue emergence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:445-449.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    Diallo M, Ba Y, Faye O, Soumare ML, Dia I, Sall AA. Vector competence of aedes aegypti populations from Senegal for sylvatic and epidemic dengue 2 virus isolated in West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:493-498.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.02.010

  93. 93.

    Black WC, Bennett KE, Gorrochotegui-Escalante N, Barillas-Mury CV, Fernandez-Salas I, de Lourdes Munoz M, Farfan-Ale JA, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. Flavivirus susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Arch Med Res. 2002;33:379-388.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0188-4409(02)00373-9

  94. 94.

    Vasilakis N, Cardosa J, Hanley KA, Holmes EC, Weaver SC. Fever from the forest: Prospects for the continued emergence of sylvatic dengue virus and its impact on public health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:532-541.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2595

  95. 95.

    Cordellier R, Bouchite B, Roche JC, Monteny N, Diaco B, Akoliba P. Circulation selvatique du virus dengue 2, en 1980, dans les savanes sub-soudaniennes de Cote d'Ivoire. Cah ORSTOM ser Ent Med et Parasitol. 1983;21:165-179.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Roche JC, Cordellier R, Hervy JP, Digoutte JP, Monteny N. Isolement de 96 souches de virus dengue 2 a partir de moustiques captures en Cote d'Ivoire et en Haute Volta. Ann Virol (Institut Pasteur). 1983;134E:233-244.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    Vasilakis N, Tesh RB, Weaver SC. Sylvatic dengue virus type 2 activity in humans, Nigeria, 1966. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:502-504.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1403.070843

  98. 98.

    Weaver SC, Vasilakis N. Molecular evolution of dengue viruses: Contributions of phylogenetics to understanding the history and epidemiology of the preeminent arboviral disease. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:523-540.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2009.02.003

  99. 99.
    Consequences of the Expanding Global Distribution of Aedes albopictus for Dengue Virus Transmission · 2010
    No notice
  100. 100.

    Rosen L, Roseboom LE, Gubler DJ, Lien JC, Chaniotis BN. Comparative susceptibility of mosquito species and strains to oral and parenteral infection with dengue and Japanese encephalitis viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34:603-615.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.603

  101. 101.

    Leichtenstern O, Nothnagel H. Influenza and dengue. Specielle pathologie und therapie. 1896;IV:133-226.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    Cleland JE, Bradley B, McDonald W. On the transmission of Australian dengue by the mosquito Stegomyia fasciata. Med J Aust. 1916;2:179-200.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Siler JF, Hall MW, Hitchens AP. Dengue: Its history, epidemiology, mechanism of transmission, etiology, clinical manifestations, immunity, and prevention. Philippine J Sci. 1926;29:1-252.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Pybus OG, Rambaut A, Holmes EC, Harvey PH. New inferences from tree shape: Numbers of missing taxa and population growth rates. Syst Biol. 2002;51:881-888.

    Not in our library10.1080/10635150290102582

  105. 105.
    Amplification of the Sylvatic Cycle of Dengue Virus Type 2, Senegal, 1999–2000: Entomologic Findings and Epidemiologic Considerations · 2003
    No notice
  106. 106.

    Hervy JP, LF, Roche JC, Monteny N, Diaco B. Circulation du virus dengue 2 dans plusieurs milieux boisés des savanes soudaniennes de la région de Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). Cahier ORSTOM Série Entomol Méd et Parasitol. 1984;22:135-143.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    Robin Y, Cornet M, Heme G, Le Gonidec G. Isolement du virus de la dengue au Senegal. Ann Virol (Institut Pasteur). 1980;131:149-154.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    Saluzzo JF, Cornet M, Adam C, Eyraud M, Digoutte JP. Dengue 2 in eastern Senegal: Serologic survey in simian and human populations. 1974–85. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1986;79:313-322.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    Rudnick A. Studies of the ecology of dengue in Malaysia: A preliminary report. J Med Entomol. 1965;2:203-208.

    Not in our library10.1093/jmedent/2.2.203

  110. 110.

    Yuwono J, Suharyono W, Koiman I, Tsuchiya Y, Tagaya I. Seroepidemiological survey on dengue and Japanese encephalitis virus infections in Asian monkeys. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 1984;15:194-200.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Rosen L. Experimental infection of new world monkeys with dengue and yellow fever viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1958;7:406-410.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1958.7.406

  112. 112.

    Rosen L. Observations on the epidemilogy of dengue in Panama. Am J Hyg. 1958;68:45-58.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119948

  113. 113.

    Roberts DR, Peyton EL, Pinheiro FP, Balderrama F, Vargas R. Associations of arbovirus vectors with gallery forests and domestic environments in southeastern Bolivia. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1984;18:337-350.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    Germain M, Sureau P, Herve JP, Fabre J, Mouchet J, Robin Y, Geoffroy B. Isolements du virus de la fievre jaune a partir d' aedes du groupe A. africanus (theobald) en Republique Central Africaine. Importance des savanes humides et semi-humides en tant que zone d'emergence du virus amaril. Cah ORSTOM ser Ent Med et Parasitol. 1976;14:125-139.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    Rudnick A. Ecology of dengue virus. Asian J Infect Dis. 1978;2:156-160.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    Mattingly PF. Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem. I. Taxonomy and bionomics. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1957;51:392-408.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    Gubler DJ, Rosen L. Variation among geographic strains of Aedes albopictus in susceptibility to infection with dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1976;25:318-325.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1976.25.318

  118. 118.

    Metselaar D, Grainger CR, Oei KG, Reynolds DG, Pudney M, Leake CJ, Tukei PM, D'Offay RM, Simpson DI. An outbreak of type 2 dengue fever in the Seychelles, probably transmitted by Aedes albopictus (skuse). Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58:937-943.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    Christophers SR. Systematic. Aedes aegypti, the Yellow Fever Mosquito: Its Life History, Bionomics and Structure. 1960;21-53.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    Edwards FW, Wystman P. Diptera.Family culicidae. Genera Insectorum. 1932;194.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    Barraud PJ. The distribution of ‘stegomyia fasciata’ in India, with remarks on dengue and yellow fever. Indian J Med Res. 1928;16:377-398.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Platt KB, Linthicum KJ, Myint KS, Innis BL, Lerdthusnee K, Vaughn DW. Impact of dengue virus infection on feeding behavior of Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:119-125.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.119

  123. 123.

    Putnam JL, Scott TW. Blood-feeding behavior of dengue-2 virus-infected Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52:225-227.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.225

  124. 124.

    Harrington LC, Edman JD, Scott TW. Why do female Aedes aegypti (diptera: Culicidae) feed preferentially and frequently on human blood? J Med Entomol. 2001;38:411-422.

    Not in our library10.1603/0022-2585-38.3.411

  125. 125.

    Gubler DJ, Nalim S, Tan R, Saipan H, Sulianti Saroso J. Variation in susceptibility to oral infection with dengue viruses among geographic strains of Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1979;28:1045-1052.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1979.28.1045

  126. 126.

    Libraty DH, Endy TP, Houng HS, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Suntayakorn S, Chansiriwongs W, Vaughn DW, Nisalak A, Ennis FA, et al. Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1213-1221.

    Not in our library10.1086/340365

  127. 127.

    Khin MM, Than KA. Transovarial transmission of dengue 2 virus by Aedes aegypti in nature. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:590-594.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.590

  128. 128.

    Rosen L, Shroyer DA, Tesh RB, Freier JE, Lien JC. Transovarial transmission of dengue viruses by mosquitoes: Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:1108-1119.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.1108

  129. 129.

    Hull B, Tikasingh E, de Souza M, Martinez R. Natural transovarial transmission of dengue 4 virus in Aedes aegypti in Trinidad. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33:1248-1250.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.1248

  130. 130.

    Joshi V, Singhi M, Chaudhary RC. Transovarial transmission of dengue 3 virus by Aedes aegypti. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996;90:643-644.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90416-2

  131. 131.

    Thavara U, Siriyasatien P, Tawatsin A, Asavadachanukorn P, Anantapreecha S, Wongwanich R, Mulla MS. Double infection of heteroserotypes of dengue viruses in field populations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (diptera: Culicidae) and serological features of dengue viruses found in patients in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2006;37:468-476.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    Thongrungkiat S, Maneekan P, Wasinpiyamongkol L, Prummongkol S. Prospective field study of transovarial dengue-virus transmission by two different forms of Aedes aegypti in an urban area of Bangkok, Thailand. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:147-152.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00151.x

  133. 133.

    Guedes DR, Cordeiro MT, Melo-Santos MA, Magalhaes T, Marques E, Regis L, Furtado AF, Ayres CF. Patient-based dengue virus surveillance in Aedes aegypti from Recife, Brazil. J Vector Borne Dis. 2010;47:67-75.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    Zeidler JD, Acosta PO, Barreto PP, Cordeiro Jda S. Dengue virus in Aedes aegypti larvae and infestation dynamics in Roraima, Brazil. Rev Saude Publ. 2008;42:986-991.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0034-89102008005000055

  135. 135.

    Arunachalam N, Tewari SC, Thenmozhi V, Rajendran R, Paramasivan R, Manavalan R, Ayanar K, Tyagi BK. Natural vertical transmission of dengue viruses by Aedes aegypti in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Ind J Med Res. 2008;127:395-397.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    Gunther J, Martinez-Munoz JP, Perez-Ishiwara DG, Salas-Benito J. Evidence of vertical transmission of dengue virus in two endemic localities in the state of Oaxaca, Mexico. Intervirology. 2007;50:347-352.

    Not in our library10.1159/000107272

  137. 137.

    Mitchell CJ, Miller BR. Vertical transmission of dengue viruses by strains of Aedes albopictus recently introduced into Brazil. J Am Mosq Contl Assoc. 1990;6:251-253.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    Rosen L. Further observations on the mechanism of vertical transmission of flaviviruses by aedes mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39:123-126.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1988.39.123

  139. 139.

    Shroyer DA. Vertical maintenance of dengue-1 virus in sequential generations of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Contl Assoc. 1990;6:312-314.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    Freier JE, Rosen L. Vertical transmission of dengue viruses by Aedes mediovittatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39:218-222.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1988.39.218

  141. 141.

    Freier JE, Rosen L. Vertical transmission of dengue viruses by mosquitoes of the Aedes scutellaris group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;37:640-647.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1987.37.640

  142. 142.

    Goncalvez AP, Escalante AA, Pujol FH, Ludert JE, Tovar D, Salas RA, Liprandi F. Diversity and evolution of the envelope gene of dengue virus type 1. Virology. 2002;303:110-119.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.2002.1686

  143. 143.

    Wittke V, Robb TE, Thu HM, Nisalak A, Nimmannitya S, Kalayanrooj S, Vaughn DW, Endy TP, Holmes EC, Aaskov JG. Extinction and rapid emergence of strains of dengue 3 virus during an interepidemic period. Virology. 2002;301:148-156.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.2002.1549

  144. 144.

    Zhang C, Mammen MP, Chinnawirotpisan P, Klungthong C, Rodpradit P, Monkongdee P, Nimmannitya S, Kalayanarooj S, Holmes EC. Clade replacements in dengue virus serotypes 1 and 3 are associated with changing serotype prevalence. J Virol. 2005;79:15123-15130.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.24.15123-15130.2005

  145. 145.

    Vezza AC, Rosen L, Repik P, Dalrymple J, Bishop DH. Characterization of the viral RNA species of prototype dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29:643-652.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1980.29.643

  146. 146.

    Repik PM, Dalrymple JM, Brandt WE, McCown JM, Russell PK. RNA fingerprinting as a method for distinguishing dengue 1 virus strains. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:577-589.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.577

  147. 147.

    Henchal EA, Repik PM, McCown JM, Brandt WE. Identification of an antigenic and genetic variant of dengue-4 virus from the Caribbean. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:393-400.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.393

  148. 148.

    Kanakaratne N, Wahala WMPB, Messer WB, Tissera HA, Shahani A, Abeysinghe N, de Silva AM, Gunasekara MB. Severe dengue epidemics in Sri Lanka, 2003–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:192-199.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1502.080926

  149. 149.
    Phylogenetic history demonstrates two different lineages of dengue type 1 virus in Colombia · 2010
    Not checked
  150. 150.

    Teoh BT, Sam SS, Abd-Jamil J, AbuBakar S. Isolation of ancestral sylvatic dengue virus type 1, Malaysia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1783-1785.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1611.100721

  151. 151.

    Thu HM, Lowry K, Myint TT, Shwe TN, Han AM, Khin KK, Thant KZ, Thein S, Aaskov J. Myanmar dengue outbreak associated with displacement of serotypes 2, 3, and 4 by dengue 1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:593-597.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1004.030216

  152. 152.

    Ong SH, Yip JT, Chen YL, Liu W, Harun S, Lystiyaningsih E, Heriyanto B, Beckett CG, Mitchell WP, Hibberd ML, et al. Periodic re-emergence of endemic strains with strong epidemic potential—A proposed explanation for the 2004 Indonesian dengue epidemic. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8:191-204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2007.12.005

  153. 153.

    Diaz FJ, Black WCt, Farfan-Ale JA, Lorono-Pino MA, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. Dengue virus circulation and evolution in Mexico: A phylogenetic perspective. Arch Med Res. 2006;37:760-773.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.02.004

  154. 154.

    Zheng K, Zhou HQ, Yan J, Ke CW, Maeda A, Maeda J, Takashima I, Kurane I, Ma H, Xie XM. Molecular characterization of the E gene of dengue virus type 1 isolated in Guangdong province, China, in 2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137:73-78.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0950268808000617

  155. 155.

    Cerdas-Quesada CA, Retana-Salazar AP. Characterization and phylogenetic relationships of strains of dengue type 1 virus from Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop. 2007;55:365-372.

    Not in our library10.15517/rbt.v55i2.6016

  156. 156.

    Myat Thu H, Lowry K, Jiang L, Hlaing T, Holmes EC, Aaskov J. Lineage extinction and replacement in dengue type 1 virus populations are due to stochastic events rather than to natural selection. Virology. 2005;336:163-172.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2005.03.018

  157. 157.

    Raghwani J, Rambaut A, Holmes EC, Hang VT, Hien TT, Farrar J, Wills B, Lennon NJ, Birren BW, Henn MR, Simmons CP. Endemic dengue associated with the co-circulation of multiple viral lineages and localized density-dependent transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002064.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1002064

  158. 158.

    Imrie A, Roche C, Zhao Z, Bennett S, Laille M, Effler P, Cao-Lormeau VM. Homology of complete genome sequences for dengue virus type-1, from dengue-fever- and dengue-haemorrhagic-fever-associated epidemics in Hawaii and French Polynesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2010;104:225-235.

    Not in our library10.1179/136485910x12647085215570

  159. 159.

    Osman O, Fong MY, Sekaran SD. Genetic characterization of dengue virus type 1 isolated in Brunei in 2005–2006. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:678-686.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.005306-0

  160. 160.

    Aviles G, Meissner J, Mantovani R, St Jeor S. Complete coding sequences of dengue-1 viruses from Paraguay and Argentina. Virus Res. 2003;98:75-82.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2003.08.018

  161. 161.

    Swofford DL. Paup*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and othe methods). 2003.

    Not in our library

  162. 162.

    Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:817-818.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817

  163. 163.

    A-Nuegoonpipat A, Berlioz-Arthaud A, Chow V, Endy T, Lowry K, Mai le Q, Ninh TU, Pyke A, Reid M, Reynes JM, et al. Sustained transmission of dengue virus type 1 in the Pacific due to repeated introductions of different asian strains. Virology. 2004;329:505-512.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.029

  164. 164.

    Nukui Y, Tajima S, Kotaki A, Ito M, Takasaki T, Koike K, Kurane I. Novel dengue virus type 1 from travelers to Yap state, Micronesia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:343-346.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1202.050733

  165. 165.

    Shu PY, Su CL, Liao TL, Yang CF, Chang SF, Lin CC, Chang MC, Hu HC, Huang JH. Molecular characterization of dengue viruses imported into Taiwan during 2003–2007: Geographic distribution and genotype shift. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:1039-1046.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    Yan YS, Hong RT, Shen XN, Weng YW, Cai SJ, Xu BH, Li SQ, He JX, Xu LS, Lin YQ, et al. Study on the epidemiology and etiologic agent of dengue fever outbreaks in Fuzhou in 2004. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006;27:371-374.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    Zhang FC, Chen YQ, Lu YC, Wang J, Chen WS, Hong WX. Analysis on clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 1032 patients with dengue fever in Guangzhou. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005;26:421-423.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    Xu G, Dong H, Shi N, Liu S, Zhou A, Cheng Z, Chen G, Liu J, Fang T, Zhang H, et al. An outbreak of dengue virus serotype 1 infection in Cixi, Ningbo, People's Republic of China, 2004, associated with a traveler from Thailand and high density of Aedes albopictus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:1182-1188.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.

    Imrie A, Zhao Z, Bennett SN, Kitsutani P, Laille M, Effler P. Molecular epidemiology of dengue in the Pacific: Introduction of two distinct strains of dengue virus type-1 into Hawaii. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;100:327-336.

    Not in our library10.1179/136485906x105589

  170. 170.

    Morens DM, Rigau-Perez JG, Lopez-Correa RH, Moore CG, Ruiz-Tiben EE, Sather GE, Chiriboga J, Eliason DA, Casta-Velez A, Woodall JP. Dengue in Puerto Rico, 1977: Public health response to characterize and control an epidemic of multiple serotypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:197-211.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.197

  171. 171.

    Rigau-Perez JG, Gubler DJ, Vorndam AV, Clark GG. Dengue surveillance—United States, 1986–1992. MMWR CDC Surveill Sum. 1994;43:7-19.

    Not in our library

  172. 172.

    Gubler DJ. Arboviruses as imported disease agents: The need for increased awareness. Arch Virol Suppl. 1996;11:21-32.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-7091-7482-1_3

  173. 173.

    Hafkin B, Kaplan JE, Reed C, Elliott LB, Fontaine R, Sather GE, Kappus K. Reintroduction of dengue fever into the continental United States. I. Dengue surveillance in Texas, 1980. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982;31:1222-1228.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1982.31.1222

  174. 174.

    Malison MD, Waterman SH. Dengue fever in the United States. A report of a cluster of imported cases and review of the clinical, epidemiologic, and public health aspects of the disease. JAMA. 1983;249:496-500.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.249.4.496

  175. 175.

    Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:480-496.

    Not in our library10.1128/cmr.11.3.480

  176. 176.

    Dantes HG, Koopman JS, Addy CL, Zarate ML, Marin MA, Longini Junior IM, Guttierez ES, Rodriguez VA, Garcia LG, Mirelles ER. Dengue epidemics on the pacific coast of Mexico. Int J Epidemiol. 1988;17:178-186.

    Not in our library10.1093/ije/17.1.178

  177. 177.

    Herrera-Basto E, Prevots DR, Zarate ML, Silva JL, Sepulveda-Amor J. First reported outbreak of classical dengue fever at 1,700 meters above sea level in Guerrero state, Mexico, June 1988. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;46:649-653.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.649

  178. 178.

    Carvalho SE, Martin DP, Oliveira LM, Ribeiro BM, Nagata T. Comparative analysis of American dengue virus type 1 full-genome sequences. Virus Gen. 2010;40:60-66.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11262-009-0428-0

  179. 179.

    Pires Neto RJ, Lima DM, de Paula SO, Lima CM, Rocco IM, Fonseca BA. Molecular epidemiology of type 1 and 2 dengue viruses in Brazil from 1988 to 2001. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:843-852.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0100-879x2005000600005

  180. 180.

    Miagostovich MP, Nogueira RM, Cavalcanti SM, Marzochi KB, Schatzmayr HG. Dengue epidemic in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Virological and epidemiological aspects. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1993;35:149-154.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0036-46651993000200006

  181. 181.

    Nogueira RM, Schatzmayr HG, Miagostovich MP, Farias MF, Farias Filho JD. Virological study of a dengue type 1 epidemic at Rio de Janeiro. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1988;83:219-225.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02761988000200012

  182. 182.
    Laboratory Surveillance of Dengue in Argentina, 1995–2001 · 2003
    Not checked
  183. 183.

    Guzman MG, Kouri G, Valdes L, Bravo J, Alvarez M, Vazques S, Delgado I, Halstead SB. Epidemiologic studies on dengue in Santiago de Cuba, 1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:793-799.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/152.9.793

  184. 184.

    Anonymous. Identification of human strains isolated in 1964, 1966, 1967 and 1968, as presumptive dengue virus. 1968 Annual Report. 1968;122-123.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Nisalak A, Vaughn DW, Kalayanarooj S, Green S, Rothman AL, Ennis FA. Molecular evolution of dengue type 2 virus in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:96-101.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.96

  186. 186.

    Lewis JA, Chang GJ, Lanciotti RS, Kinney RM, Mayer LW, Trent DW. Phylogenetic relationships of dengue-2 viruses. Virology. 1993;197:216-224.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.1993.1582

  187. 187.

    Salda LT, Parquet MD, Matias RR, Natividad FF, Kobayashi N, Morita K. Molecular epidemiology of dengue 2 viruses in The Philippines: Genotype shift and local evolution. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:796-802.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.

    Rabaa MA, Ty Hang VT, Wills B, Farrar J, Simmons CP, Holmes EC. Phylogeography of recently emerged DENV-2 in southern Viet Nam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e766.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000766

  189. 189.
    Emergence of the Asian 1 Genotype of Dengue Virus Serotype 2 in Viet Nam: In Vivo Fitness Advantage and Lineage Replacement in South-East Asia · 2010
    No notice
  190. 190.

    Huang JH, Liao TL, Chang SF, Su CL, Chien LJ, Kuo YC, Yang CF, Lin CC, Shu PY. Laboratory-based dengue surveillance in Taiwan, 2005: A molecular epidemiologic study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:903-909.

    Not in our library

  191. 191.

    Guzman MG, Deubel V, Pelegrino JL, Rosario D, Marrero M, Sariol C, Kouri G. Partial nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the envelope and the envelope/nonstructural protein-1 gene junction of four dengue-2 virus strains isolated during the 1981 cuban epidemic. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52:241-246.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.241

  192. 192.

    Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Salas RA, Tovar D, Nisalak A, Ramos C, Boshell J, de Mesa MT, Nogueira RM, da Rosa AT. Origins of dengue type 2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virology. 1997;230:244-251.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.1997.8504

  193. 193.

    Foster JE, Bennett SN, Carrington CV, Vaughan H, McMillan WO. Phylogeography and molecular evolution of dengue 2 in the Caribbean basin, 1981–2000. Virology. 2004;324:48-59.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.020

  194. 194.

    Rico-Hesse R. Microevolution and virulence of dengue viruses. Adv Virus Res. 2003;59:315-341.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-3527(03)59009-1

  195. 195.

    Kouri GP, Guzman MG, Bravo JR, Triana C. Dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: Lessons from the cuban epidemic, 1981. Bull World Health Org. 1989;67:375-380.

    Not in our library

  196. 196.

    Watts DM, Porter KR, Putvatana P, Vasquez B, Calampa C, Hayes CG, Halstead SB. Failure of secondary infection with American genotype dengue 2 to cause dengue haemorrhagic fever. Lancet. 1999;354:1431-1434.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04015-5

  197. 197.

    Kumar SR, Patil JA, Cecilia D, Cherian SS, Barde PV, Walimbe AM, Yadav PD, Yergolkar PN, Shah PS, Padbidri VS, et al. Evolution, dispersal and replacement of american genotype dengue type 2 viruses in India 1956–2005: Selection pressure and molecular clock analyses. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:707-720.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.017954-0

  198. 198.

    Dorji T, Yoon IK, Holmes EC, Wangchuk S, Tobgay T, Nisalak A, Chinnawirotpisan P, Sangkachantaranon K, Gibbons RV, Jarman RG. Diversity and origin of dengue virus serotypes 1, 2, and 3, Bhutan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1630-1632.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1510.090123

  199. 199.

    Zaki A, Perera D, Jahan SS, Cardosa MJ. Phylogeny of dengue viruses circulating in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: 1994 to 2006. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:584-592.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02037.x

  200. 200.

    Kanesa-thasan N, Chang GJ, Smoak BL, Magill A, Burrous MJ, Hoke CH. Molecular and epidemiologic analysis of dengue virus isolates from Somalia. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:299-303.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid0402.980220

  201. 201.

    Huhtamo E, Uzcategui NY, Siikamaki H, Saarinen A, Piiparinen H, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O. Molecular epidemiology of dengue virus strains from Finnish travelers. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:80-83.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1401.070865

  202. 202.

    Holmes EC, Tio PH, Perera D, Muhi J, Cardosa J. Importation and co-circulation of multiple serotypes of dengue virus in Sarawak, Malaysia. Virus Res. 2009;143:1-5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2009.02.020

  203. 203.

    Lee KS, Lai YL, Lo S, Barkham T, Aw P, Ooi PL, Tai JC, Hibberd M, Johansson P, Khoo SP, et al. Dengue virus surveillance for early warning, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:847-849.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1605.091006

  204. 204.

    Tung YC, Lin KH, Chiang HC, Ke LY, Chen YH, Ke GM, Chen TC, Chou LC, Lu PL. Molecular epidemiology of dengue virus serotype 2 in the Taiwan 2002 outbreak with envelope gene and nonstructural protein 1 gene analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008;24:398-407.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1607-551x(08)70163-3

  205. 205.

    Chen HL, Lin SR, Liu HF, King CC, Hsieh SC, Wang WK. Evolution of dengue virus type 2 during two consecutive outbreaks with an increase in severity in southern Taiwan in 2001–2002. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:495-505.

    Not in our library

  206. 206.

    Singh UB, Maitra A, Broor S, Rai A, Pasha ST, Seth P. Partial nucleotide sequencing and molecular evolution of epidemic causing dengue 2 strains. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:959-965.

    Not in our library10.1086/315043

  207. 207.

    Vasilakis N, Shell EJ, Fokam EB, Mason PW, Hanley KA, Estes DM, Weaver SC. Potential of ancestral sylvatic dengue-2 viruses to re-emerge. Virology. 2007;358:402-412.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.049

  208. 208.

    Leitmeyer KC, Vaughn DW, Watts DM, Salas R, Villalobos I, de C, Ramos C, Rico-Hesse R. Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis. J Virol. 1999;73:4738-4747.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.73.6.4738-4747.1999

  209. 209.

    Steel A, Gubler DJ, Bennett SN. Natural attenuation of dengue virus type-2 after a series of island outbreaks: A retrospective phylogenetic study of events in the South Pacific three decades ago. Virology. 2010;405:505-512.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2010.05.033

  210. 210.

    Lopez-Correa RH, Cline BL, Ramirez-Ronda C, Bermudez R, Sather GE, Kuno G. Dengue fever with hemorrhagic manifestations: A report of three cases from Puerto Rico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27:1216-1224.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.1216

  211. 211.

    Moreau JP, Rosen L, Saugrain J, Lagraulet J. An epidemic of dengue on Tahiti associated with hemorrhagic manifestations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1973;22:237-241.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1973.22.237

  212. 212.

    Loison G, Rosen L, Papillaud J, Tomasini J, Vaujany J, Chanalet G. La dengue en Nouvelle-Caledonie 1971–1972. Bull Soc Path Exot. 1973;66:511-519.

    Not in our library

  213. 213.

    Barnes WJ, Rosen L. Fatal hemorrhagic disease and shock associated with primary dengue infection on a pacific island. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974;23:495-506.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1974.23.495

  214. 214.

    Carey DE, Causey OR, Reddy S, Cooke AR. Dengue viruses from febrile patients in Nigeria, 1964–68. Lancet. 1971;1:105-106.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(71)90840-3

  215. 215.

    Cardosa J, Ooi MH, Tio PH, Perera D, Holmes EC, Bibi K, Abdul Manap Z. Dengue virus serotype 2 from a sylvatic lineage isolated from a patient with dengue hemorrhagic fever. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e423.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000423

  216. 216.

    Zeller HG, Traore-Lamizana M, Monlun E, Hervy JP, Mondo M, Digoutte JP. Dengue-2 virus isolation from humans during an epizootic in southeastern Senegal in November, 1990. Res Virol. 1992;143:101-102.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0923-2516(06)80088-9

  217. 217.

    Monlun E, Zeller H, Traore-Lamizana M, Hervy JP, Adam F, Mondo M, Digoutte JP. Caracteres cliniques et epidemiologiques de la dengue 2 au Senegal. Med Mal Infect. 1992;22:718-721.

    Not in our library

  218. 218.

    Saluzzo JF, Cornet M, Castagnet P, Rey C, Digoutte JP. Isolation of dengue 2 and dengue 4 viruses from patients in Senegal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986;80:5.

    Not in our library10.1016/0035-9203(86)90182-3

  219. 219.

    Franco L, Palacios G, Martinez JA, Vazquez A, Savji N, Ory FD, Sanchez-Seco MP, Martin D, Lipkin WI, Tenorio A. First report of sylvatic DENV-2-associated dengue hemorrhagic fever in West Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1251.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0001251

  220. 220.

    Hervy JP, Legros F, Roche JC, Monteny N, Diaco B. Circulation du dengue 2 dans plusieurs milieux boises des savanes soudaniennes de la region de Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). Considerations entomologiques et epidemiologiques. Cah ORSTOM ser Ent Med et Parasitol. 1984;22:135-143.

    Not in our library

  221. 221.

    Vasilakis N, Holmes EC, Fokam EB, Faye O, Diallo M, Sall AA, Weaver SC. Evolutionary processes among sylvatic dengue-2 viruses. J Virol. 2007;81:9591-9595.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02776-06

  222. 222.

    Lanciotti RS, Lewis JG, Gubler DJ, Trent DW. Molecular evolution and epidemiology of dengue-3 viruses. J Gen Virol. 1994;75:65-75.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-75-1-65

  223. 223.

    Kochel T, Aguilar P, Felices V, Comach G, Cruz C, Alava A, Vargas J, Olson J, Blair P. Molecular epidemiology of dengue virus type 3 in northern South America: 2000–2005. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8:682-688.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.008

  224. 224.

    Podder G, Breiman RF, Azim T, Thu HM, Velathanthiri N, Mai le Q, Lowry K, Aaskov JG. Origin of dengue type 3 viruses associated with the dengue outbreak in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2000 and 2001. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:263-265.

    Not in our library

  225. 225.

    Uzcategui NY, Comach G, Camacho D, Salcedo M, Cabello de Quintana M, Jimenez M, Sierra G, Cuello de Uzcategui R, James WS, Turner S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of dengue virus type 3 in Venezuela. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:1569-1575.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.18807-0

  226. 226.

    Aquino VH, Anatriello E, Goncalves PF, EV DAS, Vasconcelos PF, Vieira DS, Batista WC, Bobadilla ML, Vazquez C, Moran M, Figueiredo LT. Molecular epidemiology of dengue type 3 virus in Brazil and Paraguay, 2002–2004. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:710-715.

    Not in our library

  227. 227.

    Ramirez A, Fajardo A, Moros Z, Gerder M, Caraballo G, Camacho D, Comach G, Alarcon V, Zambrano J, Hernandez R, et al. Evolution of dengue virus type 3 genotype III in Venezuela: Diversification, rates and population dynamics. Virol J. 2010;7:329.

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-7-329

  228. 228.

    Moi ML, Takasaki T, Kotaki A, Tajima S, Lim CK, Sakamoto M, Iwagoe H, Kobayashi K, Kurane I. Importation of dengue virus type 3 to Japan from Tanzania and Cote d'Ivoire. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1770-1772.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1611.101061

  229. 229.

    Ospina MC, Diaz FJ, Osorio JE. Prolonged co-circulation of two distinct dengue virus type 3 lineages in the hyperendemic area of Medellin, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:672-678.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0766

  230. 230.
    Genetic diversity of the E Protein of Dengue Type 3 Virus · 2009
    Not checked
  231. 231.

    Villabona-Arenas CJ, Miranda-Esquivel DR, Jimenez RE. Phylogeny of dengue virus type 3 circulating in Colombia between 2001 and 2007. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:1241-1250.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02339.x

  232. 232.

    de Mora D, Andrea LD, Alvarez M, Regato M, Fajardo A, Recarey R, Colina R, Khan B, Cristina J. Evidence of diversification of dengue virus type 3 genotype III in the South American region. Arch Virol. 2009;154:699-707.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00705-009-0343-7

  233. 233.

    Kobayashi N, Thayan R, Sugimoto C, Oda K, Saat Z, Vijayamalar B, Sinniah M, Igarashi A. Type-3 dengue viruses responsible for the dengue epidemic in Malaysia during 1993–1994. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:904-909.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.904

  234. 234.

    Chow VT, Seah CL, Chan YC. Comparative analysis of NS3 sequences of temporally separated dengue 3 virus strains isolated from Southeast Asia. Intervirology. 1994;37:252-258.

    Not in our library10.1159/000150386

  235. 235.

    Dash PK, Parida MM, Saxena P, Abhyankar A, Singh CP, Tewari KN, Jana AM, Sekhar K, Rao PV. Reemergence of dengue virus type-3 (subtype-III) in India: Implications for increased incidence of dhf & dss. Virol J. 2006;3:55.

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-3-55

  236. 236.

    Usuku S, Castillo L, Sugimoto C, Noguchi Y, Yogo Y, Kobayashi N. Phylogenetic analysis of dengue-3 viruses prevalent in Guatemala during 1996–1998. Arch Virol. 2001;146:1381-1390.

    Not in our library10.1007/s007050170098

  237. 237.

    Chao DY, King CC, Wang WK, Chen WJ, Wu HL, Chang GJ. Strategically examining the full-genome of dengue virus type 3 in clinical isolates reveals its mutation spectra. Virol J. 2005;2:72.

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-2-72

  238. 238.

    Sharma S, Dash PK, Agarwal SK, Shukla J, Parida MM, Rao PV. Comparative complete genome analysis of dengue virus type 3 circulating in India between 2003–2008. J Gen Virol. 2011.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.030437-0

  239. 239.
    Comparative analysis of full genomic sequences among different genotypes of dengue virus type 3 · 2008
    Not checked
  240. 240.

    Nogueira MB, Stella V, Bordignon J, Batista WC, Borba L, Silva LH, Hoffmann FG, Probst CM, Santos CN. Evidence for the co-circulation of dengue virus type 3 genotypes III and V in the northern region of Brazil during the 2002–2004 epidemics. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103:483-488.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762008000500013

  241. 241.

    Araujo JM, Bello G, Schatzmayr HG, Santos FB, Nogueira RM. Dengue virus type 3 in Brazil: A phylogenetic perspective. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:526-529.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762009000300021

  242. 242.

    Chungue E, Deubel V, Cassar O, Laille M, Martin PM. Molecular epidemiology of dengue 3 viruses and genetic relatedness among dengue 3 strains isolated from patients with mild or severe form of dengue fever in French Polynesia. J Gen Virol. 1993;74:2765-2770.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-74-12-2765

  243. 243.

    Raekiansyah M, Pramesyanti A, Bela B, Kosasih H, Ma'roef CN, Tobing SY, Rudiman PI, Alisjahbana B, Endi TP, Green S, et al. Genetic variations and relationship among dengue virus type 3 strains isolated from patients with mild or severe form of dengue disease in Indonesia and Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2005;36:1187-1197.

    Not in our library

  244. 244.

    Corwin AL, Larasati RP, Bangs MJ, Wuryadi S, Arjoso S, Sukri N, Listyaningsih E, Hartati S, Namursa R, Anwar Z, et al. Epidemic dengue transmission in southern Sumatra, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:257-265.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90229-9

  245. 245.

    Gubler DJ, Suharyono W, Lubis I, Eram S, Gunarso S. Epidemic dengue 3 in Central Java, associated with low viremia in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981;30:1094-1099.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.1094

  246. 246.

    Gubler DJ, Suharyono W, Tan R, Abidin M, Sie A. Viraemia in patients with naturally acquired dengue infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59:623-630.

    Not in our library

  247. 247.

    Kitchener S, Leggat PA, Brennan L, McCall B. Importation of dengue by soldiers returning from East Timor to North Queensland, Australia. J Travel Med. 2002;9:180-183.

    Not in our library10.2310/7060.2002.24234

  248. 248.

    Ito M, Takasaki T, Kotaki A, Tajima S, Yuwono D, Rimal HS, dos Santos F, de Jesus MD, Lina BB, Tsuda Y, et al. Molecular and virological analyses of dengue virus responsible for dengue outbreak in East Timor in 2005. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63:181-184.

    Not in our library

  249. 249.

    Kalayanarooj S, Rimal HS, Andjaparidze A, Vatcharasaevee V, Nisalak A, Jarman RG, Chinnawirotpisan P, Mammen MP, Holmes EC, Gibbons RV. Clinical intervention and molecular characteristics of a dengue hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Timor Leste, 2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:534-537.

    Not in our library

  250. 250.

    Chow VT, Seah CL, Chan YC. Use of NS3 consensus primers for the polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of dengue viruses and other flaviviruses. Arch Virol. 1993;133:157-170.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01309751

  251. 251.

    Chungue E, Spiegel A, Roux J, Laudon F, Cardines R. Dengue-3 in French Polynesia: Preliminary data. Med J Aust. 1990;152:557-558.

    Not in our library10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb125370.x

  252. 252.

    Barcelos Figueiredo L, Batista Cecilio A, Portela Ferreira G, Paiva Drumond B, Germano de Oliveira J, Bonjardim CA, Peregrino Ferreira PC, Kroon EG. Dengue virus 3 genotype 1 associated with dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:314-316.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1402.070278

  253. 253.

    Islam MA, Ahmed MU, Begum N, Chowdhury NA, Khan AH, Parquet Mdel C, Bipolo S, Inoue S, Hasebe F, Suzuki Y, et al. Molecular characterization and clinical evaluation of dengue outbreak in 2002 in Bangladesh. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006;59:85-91.

    Not in our library

  254. 254.

    Aziz MM, Hasan KN, Hasanat MA, Siddiqui MA, Salimullah M, Chowdhury AK, Ahmed M, Alam MN, Hassan MS. Predominance of the DEN-3 genotype during the recent dengue outbreak in Bangladesh. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2002;33:42-48.

    Not in our library

  255. 255.

    Ito M, Yamada K, Takasaki T, Pandey B, Nerome R, Tajima S, Morita K, Kurane I. Phylogenetic analysis of dengue viruses isolated from imported dengue patients: Possible aid for determining the countries where infections occurred. J Travel Med. 2007;14:233-244.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00130.x

  256. 256.

    Vainio K, Noraas S, Holmberg M, Fremstad H, Wahlstrom M, Anestad G, Dudman S. Fatal and mild primary dengue virus infections imported to Norway from Africa and south-east Asia, 2008–2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15.

    Not in our library10.2807/ese.15.38.19666-en

  257. 257.

    Gubler DJ, Sather GE, Kuno G, Cabral JR. Dengue 3 virus transmission in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:1280-1284.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.1280

  258. 258.

    CDC. Dengue type 3 infection—Nicaragua and Panama, October–November 1994. JAMA. 1995;273:840-841.

    Not in our library

  259. 259.

    Guzman MG, Vazquez S, Martinez E, Alvarez M, Rodriguez R, Kouri G, de los Reyes J, Acevedo F. Dengue in Nicaragua, 1994: Reintroduction of serotype 3 in the Americas. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1996;121:102-110.

    Not in our library

  260. 260.
    Potential Risk for Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever: The Isolation of Serotype Dengue-3 in Mexico · 1996
    Not checked
  261. 261.

    Anonymous. Isolation of dengue type 3 virus prompts concern and action. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1995;29:184-185.

    Not in our library

  262. 262.

    Harris E, Sandoval E, Xet-Mull AM, Johnson M, Riley LW. Rapid subtyping of dengue viruses by restriction site-specific (RSS)-PCR. Virology. 1999;253:86-95.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.1998.9481

  263. 263.

    Peyrefitte CN, Couissinier-Paris P, Mercier-Perennec V, Bessaud M, Martial J, Kenane N, Durand JP, Tolou HJ. Genetic characterization of newly reintroduced dengue virus type 3 in Martinique (French West Indies). J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5195-5198.

    Not in our library10.1128/jcm.41.11.5195-5198.2003

  264. 264.

    Rigau-Perez JG, Ayala-Lopez A, Garcia-Rivera EJ, Hudson SM, Vorndam V, Reiter P, Cano MP, Clark GG. The reappearance of dengue-3 and a subsequent dengue-4 and dengue-1 epidemic in Puerto Rico in 1998. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:355-362.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.2002.67.355

  265. 265.

    CDC. Dengue outbreak associated with multiple serotypes—Puerto Rico, 1998. MMWR. 1998;47:952-956.

    Not in our library

  266. 266.
    Dengue Type 3 Virus, Saint Martin, 2003–2004 · 2005
    Not checked
  267. 267.

    Rodriguez-Roche R, Alvarez M, Holmes EC, Bernardo L, Kouri G, Gould EA, Halstead S, Guzman MG. Dengue virus type 3, Cuba, 2000–2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:773-774.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1105.040916

  268. 268.

    Nogueira RM, Miagostovich MP, de Filippis AM, Pereira MA, Schatzmayr HG. Dengue virus type 3 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:925-926.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762001000700007

  269. 269.

    Ocazionez RE, Cortes FM, Villar LA, Gomez SY. Temporal distribution of dengue virus serotypes in Colombian endemic area and dengue incidence. Re-introduction of dengue-3 associated to mild febrile illness and primary infection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101:725-731.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762006000700004

  270. 270.

    Barrero PR, Mistchenko AS. Genetic analysis of dengue virus type 3 isolated in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Virus Res. 2008;135:83-88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2008.02.013

  271. 271.

    Isturiz RE, Gubler DJ, Brea del Castillo J. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in Latin America and the Caribbean. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2000;14:121-140.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70221-x

  272. 272.

    Sun J, Lin J, Yan J, Fan W, Lu L, Lv H, Hou J, Ling F, Fu T, Chen Z, et al. Dengue virus serotype 3 subtype III, Zhejiang province, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:321-323.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1702.100396

  273. 273.

    Neff JM, Morris L, Gonzalez-Alcover R, Coleman PH, Lyss SB, Negron H. Dengue fever in a Puerto Rican community. Am J Epidemiol. 1967;86:162-184.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120722

  274. 274.

    Laigret J, Rosen L, Scholammer G. On an epidemic of dengue occurring in Tahiti in 1964. Relations to the “Hemorrhagic fevers” Of Southeast Asia. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1967;60:339-353.

    Not in our library

  275. 275.

    Russell PK, McCown JM. Comparison of dengue-2 and dengue-3 virus strains by neutralization tests and identification of a subtype of dengue-3. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1972;21:97-99.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1972.21.97

  276. 276.

    Saugrain J, Rosen L, Outin-Fabre D, Moreau JP. A recent epidemic due to arbovirus infections of the dengue type in Tahiti. Comparative study of the 1964 epidemic. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1970;63:636-642.

    Not in our library

  277. 277.

    Hammon WM, Rudnick A, Sather G. Viruses associated with epidemic hemorrhagic fevers of the Philippines and Thailand. Science. 1960;131:1102-1103.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.131.3407.1102

  278. 278.

    Di B, Bai ZJ, Wang YL, Luo L, Chen Y, Jiang LY, Yang ZC, Wang M. Molecular epidemiologic analysis on new emerged type 3 dengue virus in Guangzhou in 2009. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010;31:804-807.

    Not in our library

  279. 279.

    Jenkins GM, Rambaut A, Pybus OG, Holmes EC. Rates of molecular evolution in RNA viruses: A quantitative phylogenetic analysis. J Mol Evol. 2002;54:156-165.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00239-001-0064-3

  280. 280.

    Klungthong C, Zhang C, Mammen MP, Ubol S, Holmes EC. The molecular epidemiology of dengue virus serotype 4 in bangkok, Thailand. Virology. 2004;329:168-179.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.003

  281. 281.

    Lanciotti RS, Gubler DJ, Trent DW. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of dengue-4 viruses. J Gen Virol. 1997;78:2279-2284.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-78-9-2279

  282. 282.

    Zhang C, Mammen MP, Chinnawirotpisan P, Klungthong C, Rodpradit P, Nisalak A, Vaughn DW, Nimmannitya S, Kalayanarooj S, Holmes EC. Structure and age of genetic diversity of dengue virus type 2 in Thailand. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:873-883.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.81486-0

  283. 283.

    Rudnick A, Lim TW. Dengue fever studies in Malaysia. Inst Med Res Malaysia Bulletin. 1986;23:51-152.

    Not in our library

  284. 284.

    Gubler D. 2011.

    Not in our library

  285. 285.

    AbuBakar S, Wong PF, Chan YF. Emergence of dengue virus type 4 genotype IIa in Malaysia. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2437-2442.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-83-10-2437

  286. 286.

    Dash PK, Sharma S, Srivastava A, Santhosh SR, Parida MM, Neeraja M, Subbalaxmi MV, Lakshmi V, Rao PV. Emergence of dengue virus type 4 (genotype I) in India. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139:857-861.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0950268810001706

  287. 287.
    Detection of dengue-4 virus in pune, western india after an absence of 30 years - its association with two severe cases · 2011
    Not checked
  288. 288.

    Figueiredo RM, Naveca FG, Bastos MS, Melo MN, Viana SS, Farias IP. Dengue virus type 4, Manaus Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:667-669.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1404.071185

  289. 289.

    Melo FL, Romano CM, Zanotto PM. Introduction of dengue virus 4 (DENV-4) genotype I into Brazil from Asia? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e390.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000390

  290. 290.

    Fernandez J, Vera L, Tognarelli J, Fasce R, Araya P, Villagra E, Roos O, Mora J. Detection of dengue virus type 4 in Easter island, Chile. Arch Virol. 2011.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00705-011-1049-1

  291. 291.

    Foster JE, Bennett SN, Vaughan H, Vorndam V, McMillan WO, Carrington CV. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of dengue type 4 virus in the Caribbean. Virology. 2003;306:126-134.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0042-6822(02)00033-8

  292. 292.

    Carrington CV, Foster JE, Pybus OG, Bennett SN, Holmes EC. Invasion and maintenance of dengue virus type 2 and type 4 in the Americas. J Virol. 2005;79:14680-14687.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.23.14680-14687.2005

  293. 293.

    CDC. Dengue type 4 infections in U.S. travelers to the Caribbean. MMWR. 1981;30:249-250.

    Not in our library

  294. 294.

    Bennett SN, Drummond AJ, Kapan DD, Suchard MA, Munoz-Jordan JL, Pybus OG, Holmes EC, Gubler DJ. Epidemic dynamics revealed in dengue evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:811-818.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msp285

  295. 295.
    Reemergence of Dengue Virus Type 4, French Antilles and French Guiana, 2004–2005 · 2006
    Not checked
  296. 296.

    Forshey BM, Morrison AC, Cruz C, Rocha C, Vilcarromero S, Guevara C, Camacho DE, Alava A, Madrid C, Beingolea L, Suarez V, Comach G, Kochel TJ. Dengue virus serotype 4, northeastern Peru, 2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1815-1818.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1511.090663

  297. 297.

    Bennett SN, Holmes EC, Chirivella M, Rodriguez DM, Beltran M, Vorndam V, Gubler DJ, McMillan WO. Selection-driven evolution of emergent dengue virus. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:1650-1658.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msg182

  298. 298.

    Kuno G, Chang GJ, Tsuchiya KR, Karabatsos N, Cropp CB. Phylogeny of the genus flavivirus. J Virol. 1998;72:73-83.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.72.1.73-83.1998

  299. 299.

    Steinhauer DA, Domingo E, Holland JJ. Lack of evidence for proofreading mechanisms associated with an RNA virus polymerase. Gene. 1992;122:281-288.

    Not in our library10.1016/0378-1119(92)90216-c

  300. 300.

    Drake JW. Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:4171-4175.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.90.9.4171

  301. 301.

    Holmes EC. Patterns of intra- and interhost nonsynonymous variation reveal strong purifying selection in dengue virus. J Virol. 2003;77:11296-11298.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.77.20.11296-11298.2003

  302. 302.
    Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence · 2006
    No notice
  303. 303.

    Sall AA, Faye O, Diallo M, Firth C, Kitchen A, Holmes EC. Yellow fever virus exhibits slower evolutionary dynamics than dengue virus. J Virol. 2010;84:765-772.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01738-09

  304. 304.

    Rosen L. The emperor's new clothes revisited, or reflections on the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977;26:337-343.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1977.26.337

  305. 305.

    Lorono-Pino MA, Cropp CB, Farfan JA, Vorndam AV, Rodriguez-Angulo EM, Rosado-Paredes EP, Flores-Flores LF, Beaty BJ, Gubler DJ. Common occurrence of concurrent infections by multiple dengue virus serotypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:725-730.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.725

  306. 306.

    Holmes EC, Burch SS. The causes and consequences of genetic variation in dengue virus. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:74-77.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0966-842x(99)01669-8

  307. 307.

    Scott TW, Naksathit A, Day JF, Kittayapong P, Edman JD. A fitness advantage for aedes aegypti and the viruses it transmits when females feed only on human blood. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:235-239.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.235

  308. 308.

    Craig S, Thu HM, Lowry K, Wang XF, Holmes EC, Aaskov J. Diverse dengue type 2 virus populations contain recombinant and both parental viruses in a single mosquito host. J Virol. 2003;77:4463-4467.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.77.7.4463-4467.2003

  309. 309.

    Holmes EC, Worobey M, Rambaut A. Phylogenetic evidence for recombination in dengue virus. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:405-409.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026121

  310. 310.

    Tolou HJ, Couissinier-Paris P, Durand JP, Mercier V, de Pina JJ, de Micco P, Billoir F, Charrel RN, de Lamballerie X. Evidence for recombination in natural populations of dengue virus type 1 based on the analysis of complete genome sequences. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:1283-1290.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-82-6-1283

  311. 311.

    Uzcategui NY, Camacho D, Comach G, Cuello de Uzcategui R, Holmes EC, Gould EA. Molecular epidemiology of dengue type 2 virus in Venezuela: Evidence for in situ virus evolution and recombination. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:2945-2953.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-82-12-2945

  312. 312.

    Worobey M, Rambaut A, Holmes EC. Widespread intra-serotype recombination in natural populations of dengue virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7352-7357.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.13.7352

  313. 313.

    Twiddy SS, Holmes EC. The extent of homologous recombination in members of the genus flavivirus. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:429-440.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.18660-0

  314. 314.

    Perez-Ramirez G, Diaz-Badillo A, Camacho-Nuez M, Cisneros A, Munoz Mde L. Multiple recombinants in two dengue virus, serotype-2 isolates from patients from Oaxaca, Mexico. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:260.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2180-9-260

  315. 315.

    Aaskov J, Buzacott K, Field E, Lowry K, Berlioz-Arthaud A, Holmes EC. Multiple recombinant dengue type 1 viruses in an isolate from a dengue patient. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:3334-3340.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.83122-0

  316. 316.

    Chen SP, Yu M, Jiang T, Deng YQ, Qin CF, Han JF, Qin ED. Identification of a recombinant dengue virus type 1 with 3 recombination regions in natural populations in Guangdong province, China. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1175-1179.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00705-008-0090-1

  317. 317.

    Gubler DJ. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases as public health problems. Arch Med Res. 2002;33:330-342.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0188-4409(02)00378-8

  318. 318.

    Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Hunsperger E, Kroeger A, Margolis HS, Martinez E, et al. Dengue: A continuing global threat. Nat Microbiol Rev. 2010;8:S7-S16.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2460

  319. 319.

    Carrillo-Valenzo E, Danis-Lozano R, Velasco-Hernandez JX, Sanchez-Burgos G, Alpuche C, Lopez I, Rosales C, Baronti C, de Lamballerie X, Holmes EC, Ramos-Castaneda J. Evolution of dengue virus in mexico is characterized by frequent lineage replacement. Arch Virol. 2010;155:1401-1412.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00705-010-0721-1

  320. 320.

    Scott TW, Amerasinghe PH, Morrison AC, Lorenz LH, Clark GG, Strickman D, Kittayapong P, Edman JD. Longitudinal studies of aedes aegypti (diptera: Culicidae) in thailand and puerto rico: Blood feeding frequency. J Med Entomol. 2000;37:89-101.

    Not in our library10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.89

  321. 321.

    Sanchez IJ, Ruiz BH. A single nucleotide change in the E protein gene of dengue virus 2 Mexican strain affects neurovirulence in mice. J Gen Virol. 1996;77:2541-2545.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-77-10-2541

  322. 322.

    Bennett SN, Holmes EC, Chirivella M, Rodriguez DM, Beltran M, Vorndam V, Gubler DJ, McMillan WO. Molecular evolution of dengue 2 virus in Puerto Rico: Positive selection in the viral envelope accompanies clade reintroduction. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:885-893.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.81309-0

  323. 323.

    Mota J, Rico-Hesse R. Humanized mice show clinical signs of dengue fever according to infecting virus genotype. J Virol. 2009;83:8638-8645.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00581-09

  324. 324.

    Lourenco J, Recker M. Viral and epidemiological determinants of the invasion dynamics of novel dengue genotypes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e894.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000894

  325. 325.

    Guzman MG, Kouri G, Halstead SB. Do escape mutants explain rapid increases in dengue case-fatality rates within epidemics? Lancet. 2000;355:1902-1903.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02303-5

  326. 326.

    Adams B, Holmes EC, Zhang C, Mammen MP, Nimmannitya S, Kalayanarooj S, Boots M. Cross-protective immunity can account for the alternating epidemic pattern of dengue virus serotypes circulating in Bangkok. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14234-14239.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0602768103

  327. 327.

    Sittisombut N, Sistayanarain A, Cardosa MJ, Salminen M, Damrongdachakul S, Kalayanarooj S, Rojanasuphot S, Supawadee J, Maneekarn N. Possible occurrence of a genetic bottleneck in dengue serotype 2 viruses between the 1980 and 1987 epidemic seasons in Bangkok, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:100-108.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.100

  328. 328.

    Halstead SB, Porterfield JS, O'Rourke EJ. Enhancement of dengue virus infection in monocytes by flavivirus antisera. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29:638-642.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1980.29.638

  329. 329.

    Halstead SB. In vivo enhancement of dengue virus infection in rhesus monkeys by passively transferred antibody. J Infect Dis. 1979;140:527-533.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/140.4.527

  330. 330.

    Halstead SB. Pathogenesis of dengue: Challenges to molecular biology. Science. 1988;239:476-481.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.3277268

  331. 331.

    Goncalvez AP, Engle RE, St Claire M, Purcell RH, Lai CJ. Monoclonal antibody-mediated enhancement of dengue virus infection in vitro and in vivo and strategies for prevention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9422-9427.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0703498104

  332. 332.

    Cummings DA, Schwartz IB, Billings L, Shaw LB, Burke DS. Dynamic effects of antibody-dependent enhancement on the fitness of viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15259-15264.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0507320102

  333. 333.

    Holmes EC. The phylogeography of human viruses. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:745-756.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02051.x

  334. 334.

    Kawaguchi I, Sasaki A, Boots M. Why are dengue virus serotypes so distantly related? Enhancement and limiting serotype similarity between dengue virus strains. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270:2241-2247.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2003.2440

  335. 335.

    Adams B, Boots M. Modelling the relationship between antibody-dependent enhancement and immunological distance with application to dengue. J Theor Biol. 2006;242:337-346.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.03.002

  336. 336.
    Mosquitoes Put the Brake on Arbovirus Evolution: Experimental Evolution Reveals Slower Mutation Accumulation in Mosquito Than Vertebrate Cells · 2009
    No notice
  337. 337.

    Weaver SC, Brault AC, Kang W, Holland JJ. Genetic and fitness changes accompanying adaptation of an arbovirus to vertebrate and invertebrate cells. J Virol. 1999;73:4316-4326.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.73.5.4316-4326.1999

  338. 338.

    Greene IP, Wang E, Deardorff ER, Milleron R, Domingo E, Weaver SC. Effect of alternating passage on adaptation of sindbis virus to vertebrate and invertebrate cells. J Virol. 2005;79:14253-14260.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.22.14253-14260.2005

  339. 339.

    Turner PE, Elena SF. Cost of host radiation in an RNA virus. Genetics. 2000;156:1465-1470.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/156.4.1465

  340. 340.

    Ciota AT, Lovelace AO, Ngo KA, Le AN, Maffei JG, Franke MA, Payne AF, Jones SA, Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Cell-specific adaptation of two flaviviruses following serial passage in mosquito cell culture. Virology. 2007;357:165-174.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.005

  341. 341.

    Ciota AT, Lovelace AO, Jia Y, Davis LJ, Young DS, Kramer LD. Characterization of mosquito-adapted West Nile virus. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:1633-1642.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.2008/000893-0

  342. 342.

    Coffey LL, Vignuzzi M. Host alteration in chikungunya virus increases fitness while restricting population diversity and adaptability to novel selective pressures. J Virol. 2011;85:1025-1035.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01918-10

  343. 343.

    Coffey LL, Vasilakis N, Brault AC, Powers AM, Tripet F, Weaver SC. Arbovirus evolution in vivo is constrained by host alternation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:6970-6975.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0712130105

  344. 344.

    Lee E, Weir RC, Dalgarno L. Changes in the dengue virus major envelope protein on passaging and their localization on the three-dimensional structure of the protein. Virology. 1997;232:281-290.

    Not in our library10.1006/viro.1997.8570

  345. 345.

    Novella IS, Hershey CL, Escarmis C, Domingo E, Holland JJ. Lack of evolutionary stasis during alternating replication of an arbovirus in insect and mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1999;287:459-465.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1999.2635

  346. 346.

    Cooper LA, Scott TW. Differential evolution of eastern equine encephalitis virus populations in response to host cell type. Genetics. 2001;157:1403-1412.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/157.4.1403

  347. 347.

    Sanchez-Vargas I, Travanty EA, Keene KM, Franz AW, Beaty BJ, Blair CD, Olson KE. RNA interference, arthropod-borne viruses, and mosquitoes. Virus Res. 2004;102:65-74.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2004.01.017

  348. 348.

    Chen WJ, Wu HR, Chiou SS. E/NS1 modifications of dengue 2 virus after serial passages in mammalian and/or mosquito cells. Intervirology. 2003;46:289-295.

    Not in our library10.1159/000073208

  349. 349.

    de la Torre JC, Holland JJ. RNA virus quasispecies populations can suppress vastly superior mutant progeny. J Virol. 1990;64:6278-6281.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.64.12.6278-6281.1990

  350. 350.

    Ciota AT, Ngo KA, Lovelace AO, Payne AF, Zhou Y, Shi P-Y, Kramer LD. Role of the mutant spectrum in adaptation and replication of West Nile virus. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:865-874.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.82606-0

  351. 351.

    Ciota AT, Lovelace AO, Jones SA, Payne A, Kramer LD. Adaptation of two flaviviruses results in differences in genetic heterogeneity and virus adaptability. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:2398-2406.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.83061-0

  352. 352.

    Jerzak GV, Bernard K, Kramer LD, Shi PY, Ebel GD. The West Nile virus mutant spectrum is host-dependant and a determinant of mortality in mice. Virology. 2007;360:469-476.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.029

Cited by papers we hold 9

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.