Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Zearalenone and Its Metabolites—General Overview, Occurrence, and Toxicity

Karolina Ropejko, Magdalena Twarużek

Toxins · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/toxins13010035

Abstract

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of filamentous fungi and represent one of the most common groups of food contaminants with low molecular weight. These toxins are considered common and can affect the food chain at various stages of production, harvesting, storage and processing. Zearalenone is one of over 400 detected mycotoxins and produced by fungi of the genus Fusarium; it mainly has estrogenic effects on various organisms. Contaminated products can lead to huge economic losses and pose risks to animals and humans. In this review, we systemize information on zearalenone and its major metabolites.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Zearalenone (ZEN) is a mycotoxin produced by fungi of the genus Fusarium, mainly F. graminearum, F. culmorum, F. cerealis, F. equiseti, F. crookwellense, F. semitectum, F. verticillioides, F. sporotrichioides, F. oxysporum and F. acuminatum. Fungi especially produce ZEN in temperate and warmer climates. Zearalenone has the general formula C18H22O5 (Figure 1) and is a 6-(10-hydroxy-6-oxy-trans-1-undecenyl-beta-resorcylic acid lactone). It was isolated, for the first time (as F-2), from maize inoculated with Fusarium.

The name “zearalenone” is derived from the combination of the terms maize (Zea mays)—“zea”, resorcylic acid lactone—“ral”, —“en” for the presence of a double-bond, and “one” for the ketone group; ZEN is a non-steroidal estrogen mycotoxin biosynthesized via the polyketide pathway.

The structure of ZEN is similar to that of naturally occurring estrogens such as estradiol, estrone, estriol, 7β-estradiol, and 17-β-estradiol. It has a molar mass of 318.364 g/mol and is a weakly polar compound in the form of white crystals, with blue-green fluorescence at 360 nm excitation and green fluorescence at 260 nm UV excitation. The melting point of ZEN is 164–165 °C. Although it is insoluble in water, it dissolves well in various alkaline solutions such as benzene, acetonitrile, acetone, or alcohols. Zearalenone is thermostable, and is not degraded by processing such as milling, extrusion, storage, or heating. This mycotoxin accumulates in grains mainly before the harvest, but also after harvesting under poor storage conditions.

Suitable conditions for the production of ZEN by fungi are characterized by temperatures between 20 and 25 °C and humidity above 20%, when ZEN can be generated within 3 weeks. However, when fungi are exposed to stress and low temperatures of 8–15 °C, they will produce ZEN within a few weeks. Research has shown that high levels of zearalenone in grains are frequently found in countries with a warm and wet climate.

Zearalenone is metabolized in the intestinal cells and has two main metabolites: α-zearalenol (α-ZEL) (a synthetic form of zearalenone) and β-zearalenol (β-ZEL); they are formed via the reduction of ZEN. Other forms of zearalenone are α-zearalanol (α-ZAL) and β-zearalanol (β-ZAL). In its metabolized form, it can be conjugated with glucuronic acid. Due to the double bond in the lactone ring (C11 and C12), ZEN can exist as two isomers: trans and cis, of which the cis form has a greater affinity for estrogen receptors. Of the metabolites, α-ZEL has increased estrogenic activity compared to α-ZAL and ZEN produced by pig liver microsomes, while chicken microsomes produce the highest amounts of β-ZEL, which has, however, a lower estrogenic activity, but is the most frequently detected metabolite in cattle. Hydroxylation of ZEN to α-ZEL is an activation process, whereas the production of β-ZEL is a deactivation process. Böswald et al. investigated the ability of certain yeast strains to metabolize ZEN and showed that ZEN, α-ZEL, and β-ZEL were reduced by Candida, Hansenula, Pichia, and Saccharomyces species. The fungal species Clonostachys rosea has the ability to metabolize the ester bond in the ZEN lactone ring, which reduces its estrogenic activity. Infected plants can metabolize fungal toxins mainly by forming glucose conjugates, and studies have shown that ZEN can be converted to zearalenone-14-O-β-glucoside, which does not interact with the human estrogen receptor in vitro. Based on results, adsorption of ZEN can occur on the hydrophobic talc surface, which is more effective than the hydrophilic diatomaceous earth surface. This makes the use of talc as a sorbent a promising method of ZEN decontamination.

2. The Occurrence of ZEN in Food

Due to its toxicity, the presence of ZEN in food has been widely studied. The European Commission has specified the maximum standards of ZEN in selected food products (Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 and Commission Recommendation No. 2006/576/EC, as amended) (Table 1).

Zearalenone has been detected frequently in different cereals, such as wheat, barley, maize, sorghum, rye, rice, corn silage, sesame seed, hay, flour, malt, soybeans, beer, and corn oil.

It can also occur in grain-based products such as grains for human consumption, baked goods, pasta breakfast cereals, and bread. When cows consume foods contaminated with ZEN, it can be detected in their milk, thereby reaching the human food chain.

The result of research on the presence of ZEN in food conducted by scientists from around the world are presented in the tables below (Table 2).

Several studies have found ZEN metabolites in various food items (Table 3).

The data presented in Table 2 refer to presence of ZEN in food. On their example, the following conclusions can be drawn: the most contaminated samples are samples of maize, raw maize, corn, beans, grains and feed mixtures for fattening pigs (over 75% of positive samples in the described examples), while the least contaminated are samples of wheat, peas, barley, cow’s milk-based infant formula and beer (up to 15% of positive samples in the described examples). The highest levels of ZEN were found in samples of corn, corn grains, fibrous feed, feed mixtures for fattening pigs and fish feed. This confirms that grains and feeding stuff are the most exposed to the presence of ZEN. However, it should be remembered that these are data selected from many publications by authors from around the world. The data presented in Table 3 refer to presence of ZEN metabolites in food products. On their basis it can be concluded that the ZEN metabolites are not common in food as ZEN itself. The most common was α-ZEL in the chicken heart and chicken gizzard samples, nevertheless, the levels detected were relatively low—mean 3.60–4.01 µg/kg. The highest level of α-ZEL was found in the fish feed—188.4 ng/mL.

3. The Occurrence of ZEN in Body Fluids

ZEN and its metabolites are absorbed by the body when ingested with food. For this reason, it can appear in biological fluids such as blood, urine and milk (including women breast milk). Research on biological fluids of various species is carried out in many countries around the world. The table below (Table 4) presents the results of research by scientists from individual countries. ZEN occurrence in body fluids indicates the presence of ZEN in a body. This is disadvantageous because of the damage to the organism that ZEN causes.

Table 4 shows examples of the occurrence of ZEN in body fluids such as serum, milk and urine. Of all examples presented, the highest level of ZEN was found in urine of pig’s samples (male—350 µg/L and female—390 µg/L), while in humans it was in the urine of men from Germany—100 ng/L. High levels of ZEN have also been found in the urine of breastfed (784 ng/L) and non-exclusively breastfed infants (678 ng/L). This may indicate that ZEN is metabolized more slowly in infants than in adults.

Mauro et al. in 2018 conducted a study whose results showed that ZEN is present in the serum of obese women. This may be related to meat consumption and body mass index. The level of ZEN however, was lower than that of women of normal weight. 0.405 ± 0.403 ng/mL and 0.711 ± 0.412 ng/mL, respectively. In addition, the same study showed that the mean values of conjugated metabolites of ZEN in premenopausal women were higher than in postmenopausal women—1.40 ± 0.645 and 1166 ± 1007 ng/mL, respectively.

In the last few years, the influence of ZEN and its metabolites on human health has been increasingly studied. In 2002, Pillay et al. Conducted a study of the serum of patients with breast cancer, cervical cancer, other gynecological diagnoses and healthy. The research did not show any significant changes between the presence of ZEN and its metabolites in the tested samples. Mean ± SD ZEN values ranged between 0.457 ± 1.06 µg/mL, 0.381 ± 0.82 µg/mL, 0.200 ± 0.38 µg/mL, 0.346 ± 0.51 µg/mL in breast cancer, cervical cancer, other gynecological diagnoses and healthy samples respectively. Mean ± SD α-ZEL values ranged between 0.193 ± 0.50 µg/mL, 0.154 ± 0.26 µg/mL, 0.070 ± 0.16 µg/mL, and 0.378 ± 0.89 µg/mL in breast cancer, cervical cancer, other gynecological diagnoses and healthy samples respectively, also mean ± SD β-ZEL values ranged between 0.233 ± 0.69 µg/mL, 0.707 ± 1.51 µg/mL, 0.215 ± 0.60 µg/mL, 0.110 ± 0.51 µg/mL in breast cancer, cervical cancer, other gynecological diagnoses and healthy samples respectively. A similar study was conducted by Fleck et al.. Their results showed the presence of ZEN in only 1 out of 11 urine samples of pregnant women with value to the limit of quantification.

Another study was conducted in 2017 by De Santis et al.. The authors investigated the possible relationship between the occurrence of ZEN in the body and autistic disorders. Urine and serum samples of children with autism were examined, the maximum level of ZEN was 6.5 and 3.9 ng/mL, respectively as well as urine and serum samples of their siblings where the maximum ZEN level was 2.8 and 1.2 ng/mL, respectively. These results suggest that patients with autistic disorder have significantly more mycotoxin from body fluids than their healthy siblings who should have similar food habits.

Moreover, Tassis et al. carried out a boar semen analysis. The authors showed that ZEN negatively affects various sperm parameters such as sperm viability and motility.

4. The Impact of ZEN on Organisms

Zearalenone is a mycotoxin with immunotoxic, hepatotoxic, and xenogenic effects. The activity of ZEN in living organisms depends on the immune status of the organism and the state of the reproductive system (adolescence or pregnancy stage). In the liver, ZEN induces histopathological changes, with the subsequent development of liver cancer; according to Rai et al., the liver is the major organ of ZEN distribution. In the case of liver injury, ZEN can cause an increase in serum transaminases and bilirubin levels in rodents; in addition, it can lead to weight loss in rats and fish.

Zearalenone has hematotoxic effects by disturbing blood coagulation and modifying blood parameters. Studies have shown that in the serum of mice treated with ZEN, the levels of ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase), ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase), and AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) were increased, while those of total protein and albumin were decreased. In studies conducted in rats, an increase in hematocrit and MCV (mean corpuscular volume) index was observed, while the number of red blood cells remained unchanged; the number of platelets was significantly decreased and that of white blood cells was increased. The same study also showed that the blood creatinine value was decreased in the samples with ZEN. Zwierzchowski et al., in a study on gilts that received small doses of ZEN orally, showed that after the first administration of the toxin, its concentration in the blood serum was high; however, after administration of the same dose in the following days, its level decreased (until day 4) and then increased again.

Zearalenone is a mycotoxin with strong estrogenic and anabolic effects. One of the metabolites of ZEN, α-ZAL, is used as a growth promoter due to its anabolic activity. Zearalenone and its derivatives show estrogenic effects in various animal species. In humans, ZEN can bind to alpha and beta estrogen receptors and disrupt the functioning of the endocrine system. The species most sensitive to the effects of ZEN are pigs and ruminants, while the most resistant ones are birds, such as chickens and poultry. The estrogenic effects of ZEN include fertility disorders (infertility or reduced fertility), vaginal prolapse, vulvar swelling and breast enlargement in females, feminization of testicular atrophy, and enlargement of the mammary glands in males in various animal species. It can also cause enlargement of the uterine, increased incidence of pseudopregnancy, decreased libido, stillbirths, and small litters. In female pigs, redness and swelling of the vulva, enlargement of the uterus, cyst formation on the ovaries, and enlargement of the mammary glands have been observed, whereas in male pigs, testicular atrophy and reduced sperm concentration are common. Zearalenone inhibits the secretion of steroid hormones, interferes with the estrogen response in the pre-ovulatory phase, and inhibits follicle maturation in mammals. Higher concentrations of ZEN cause permanent estrus, pseudo-pregnancy, and infertility in gilts. In cows, symptoms of ZEN actions are swollen vulva, disturbances in estrus cycles, infertility, inflammation of the uterus and mammary gland, miscarriages, placental retention, and vaginitis; ZEN is also responsible for the hyperestrogenic syndrome. Newborn female mice that received ZEN orally showed altered oocyte development and folliculogenesis later in life. In humans, ZEN causes premature puberty. In pregnant women, long-term exposure to ZEN via food may result in decreased embryo survival and reduced fetal weight, as well as decreased milk production. It is also assumed that ZEN can change uterine tissue morphology and cause a decrease in LH and progesterone levels. In men, ZEN reduces the number of sperm and their viability; it can also impede spermatogenesis.

Studies on the estrogenic effect of ZEN and its modified forms have been carried out in zebrafish (model fish species), showing that ZEN passively crosses the cell membrane and binds to ER receptors. The ZEN receptor complex is rapidly transported to the nucleus, where it binds to estrogen-responsive elements, resulting in gene transcription. Pietsch et al. fed carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) with ZEN-contaminated feed and showed that the estrogenic activity in these animals was not increased, indicating that ZEN is rapidly metabolized in carp.

According to Gil-Serna et al., ZEN is also genotoxic and can form DNA adducts in vitro. Further, it causes DNA fragmentation, micronucleus formation, chromosomal aberration, cell proliferation, and cell apoptosis. Research shows that ZEN and β-ZEL can mimic the ability of 17-β-estradiol to stimulate estrogen receptor transcriptional activity. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified ZEN as a Group 3 substance (not carcinogenic to humans). Zearalenone cytotoxicity can manifest by apoptosis in the germ cells of male rats.

The WHO/FAO determined the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of ZEN at 200 µg/kg bw/day study in a 15-day pig study, 56 µg/kg bw/day for sheep, 17.6 µg/kg bw/day for piglets, 200 µg/kg bw/day for gilts, and 20 µg/kg bw/day for dogs. The no effect level (NOEL) was 40 µg/kg bw/day for pigs, 9200 µg for mice, 28 lg/kg bw/day for sheep, 100 μg/kg bw for rats, 10.4 µg/kg bw/day for piglets, and 40 µg/kg bw/day for gilts.

Obremski et al. investigated the effect of LOAEL doses on gilts and showed that an orally administered dose of 200 µg/kg (the LOAEL dose) caused mild symptoms of hyperestrogenism in sexually immature gilts on the fourth day after toxin administration, whereas a dose twice as high (400 µg/kg) resulted in more pronounced symptoms of hyperestrogenism on the third day after oral administration of the toxin.

The oral LD50 ZEN dose for mice, rats, and guinea pigs is above 2000 mg/kg bw, and the median toxic dose (TD50) was established at 20,000 µg for mice. The EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain stated a tolerable daily intake (TDI) for ZEN of 0.25 μg/kg bw.

Table 5 shows the various parameters of ZEN.

5. Toxicokinetics of ZEN

The toxicokinetics of ZEN mainly include issues such as the rate at which it can enter the body, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The main way for ZEN to enter organisms is through its consumption with contaminated food. In organisms, it can undergo structural changes through the intestinal microflora. These changes lead to the production of various ZEN metabolites.

After oral administration, ZEN is rapidly absorbed. In the intestinal walls of monogastric animals and the human gastrointestinal tract, ZEN is metabolized by enterocytes to the major metabolites α- and β-ZEL and α- and β-ZAL, followed by biotransformation via two pathways. The first is based on hydroxylation, leading to the formation of α- and β-ZEL when catalyzed by 3α- and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSD). The α form has a greater affinity for estrogen receptors and is therefore more toxic than ZEN, while the β form has a lower affinity for these receptors, making it practically harmLess. The second biotransformation pathway relies on uridine-5-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT)-catalyzed conjugation of ZEN and its metabolites with glucuronic acid. In humans, ZEN biotransformation occurs in the liver, lungs, kidneys, and intestines. Nevertheless, in human organisms, it is mainly in the liver that ZEN is converted into α and β isomers via microsomes. In it, the metabolizing ZEN is through monohydroxylation via cytochrome P450 (CYP).

After oral administration, ZEN is rapidly absorbed. In pigs, it has been detected in plasma less than 30 min after starting feeding. It is deposited in the reproductive tissues, adipose tissue, and testicular cells, as well as in the kidney cells. Its half-life in pigs is approximately 86 h, and in these animals, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract occurs to 80–85%. In other organisms, ZEN and its metabolites have a short half-life of less than 24 h and are mainly excreted in the bile, feces, and urine after 72 h. Metabolism includes Phase I of the reduction reaction and Phase II of the glucuronidation or sulfonation reaction. Metabolism of phase I reduce keto group at C-6′ resulting α-ZEL or β-ZEL. Following reduction of the double bond C11-C12 leads to α-ZAL or β-ZAL. Studies show that the reduction of the ketone group is catalyzed by HSD. Hepatic biotransformation may be influenced by species differences and related ZEN sensitivities. The largest amounts of α-ZEL, which has the highest estrogenic activity, are produced by the liver microsomes of pigs, while the microsomes of chickens, which produce the most β-ZEL, which has the lowest estrogenic activity.

ZEN and its metabolites can interact with the cytoplasmic receptor it binds to 17β-estradiol and transfer receptors to the nucleus, where RNA simulation leads to protein synthesis which is the reason why the estrogenic symptoms occur.

In conclusion, ZEN and its metabolites are eliminated relatively slowly from the tissues by enterohepatic circulation. The carry-over to milk is quite low, confirming that human exposure to food of animal origin is significantly lower than direct exposure through the use of defective feed and grains.

6. Conclusions

Zearalenone is the main mycotoxin produced by Fusarium and can negatively affect most species. It causes various changes and disorders related to the reproductive system, generating considerable economic losses. Regarding the toxicity of zearalenone and its metabolites, they pose a potential risk to mammals, especially when exposed to high doses over prolonged periods. Consuming excessive amounts of mycotoxins can cause poisoning, the so-called “mycotoxicosis”, posing a considerable threat for animals and humans. In this review, we present the various effects of zearalenone and its metabolites. Based on the ubiquitous occurrence of these compounds, it is crucial to develop methods of decontamination and to impede the production of zearalenone.

References 93

  1. 1.

    SCOOP (European Commission, Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection- Scientific Co-Operation on Questions relating to Food). SCOOP, Task 3.2.10. Collection of Occurrence Data of Fusarium Toxins in Food and Assessment of Dietary Intake by the Populstion of EU Member States. European Commission, Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection, Reports on Tasks Forscientific Co-Operation. 2003.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Gil-Serna J., Vázquez C., González-Jaén M.T., Patiño B., Batt C.A., Tortorello M.L. Mycotoxins. Toxicology. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. 2014;887-892.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Mostrom M.S., Basic and Clinical Principles, Gupta R. Zearalenone. Veterinary Toxicology. 2012;1266-1271.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Mizutani K., Nagatomi Y., Mochizuki N. Metabolism of Zearalenone in the Course of Beer Fermentation. Toxins. 2011;3:134-141.

    Not in our library10.3390/toxins3020134

  5. 5.

    Mally A., Solfrizzo M., Degen G.H. Biomonitoring of the mycotoxin Zearalenone: Current state--of--the art and application to human exposure assessment. Arch. Toxicol. 2016;90:1281-1292.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00204-016-1704-0

  6. 6.

    Urry W.H., Wehrmeister H.H., Hodge E.B., Hidy P.H. The structure of zearalenone. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966;7:3109-3114.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0040-4039(01)99923-x

  7. 7.

    Stob M., Baldwin R.S., Tuite J., Andrews F.N., Gillette K.G. Isolation of an anabolic, uterotrophic compound from corn infected with Gibberella zeae. Nature. 1962;196:1318.

    Not in our library10.1038/1961318a0

  8. 8.

    Tsakmakidis I.A., Lymberopoulos A.G., Alexopoulos C., Boscos C.M., Kyriakis S.C. In vitro Effffect of Zearalenone and a-Zearalenol on Boar Sperm Characteristics and Acrosome Reaction. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2006;41:394-401.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00679.x

  9. 9.

    Zinedine A., Soriano J.M., Moltó J.C., Mañes J. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007;45:1-18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.030

  10. 10.

    Gromadzka K., Waskiewicz A., Chełkowski J., Goliński P. Zearalenone and its metabolites: Occurrence, detection, toxicity and guidelines. World Mycotoxin J. 2008;1:209-220.

    Not in our library10.3920/wmj2008.x015

  11. 11.

    Edite Bezerra da Rocha M., da Freire F.C.O., Erlan Feitosa Maia F., Guedes M.I.F., Rondina D. Mycotoxins and their effects on human and animal health. Food Control. 2014;36:159-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.021

  12. 12.

    Martins C., Torres D., Lopes C., Correia D., Goios A., Assunção R., Alvito P., Vidal A., De Boevre M., De Saeger S., et al. Food Consumption Data as a Tool to Estimate Exposure to Mycoestrogens. Toxins. 2020;12:118.

    Not in our library10.3390/toxins12020118

  13. 13.

    Rogowska A., Pomastowski P., Sagandykova G., Buszewski B. Zearalenone and its metabolites: Effect on human health, metabolism and neutralisation methods. Toxicon. 2019;162:46-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.03.004

  14. 14.

    Döll S., Dänicke S. The Fusarium toxins deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZON) in animal feeding. Prev. Veter. Med. 2011;102:132-145.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.008

  15. 15.

    Chang H., Kim W., Park J.-H., Kim D., Kim C.-R., Chung S., Lee C. The Occurrence of Zearalenone in South Korean Feedstuffs between 2009 and 2016. Toxins. 2017;9:223.

    Not in our library10.3390/toxins9070223

  16. 16.

    Hidy P.H., Baldwin R.S., Greasham R.L., Keith C.L., Mcmullen J.R. Zearalenone and Some Derivatives: Production and Biological Activities. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1977;22:59-82.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-2164(08)70160-6

  17. 17.

    Ben Salah-Abbès J., Belgacem H., Ezzdini K., Abdel-Wahhab M.A., Abbès S. Zearalenone nephrotoxicity: DNA fragmentation, apoptotic gene expression and oxidative stress protected by Lactobacillus plantarum MON03. Toxicon. 2020;175:28-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.12.004

  18. 18.

    Kovalsky Paris M.P., Schweiger W., Hametner C., Stückler R., Muehlbauer G.J., Varga E., Krska R., Berthiller F., Adam G. Zearalenone-16-O-glucoside: A New Masked Mycotoxin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:1181-1189.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf405627d

  19. 19.

    Ueberschär K.-H., Brezina U., Dänicke S. Zearalenone (ZEN) and ZEN metabolites in feed, urine and bile of sows: Analysis, determination of the metabolic profile and evaluation of the binding forms. Appl. Agric. For. Res. 2016;1:21-28.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Minervini F., Giannoccaro A., Fornelli F., Dell’Aquila M.E., Minoia P., Visconti A. Influence of mycotoxin zearalenone and its derivatives (alpha and beta zearalenol) on apoptosis and proliferation of cultured granulosa cells from equine ovaries. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2006;4:62.

    Not in our library10.1186/1477-7827-4-62

  21. 21.

    Mirocha C.J., Pathre S.V., Behrens J., Schauerhamer B. Uterotropic activity of cis and trans isomers of zearalenone and zearalenol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1978;35:986-987.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.35.5.986-987.1978

  22. 22.

    Rai A., Das M., Tripathi A. Occurrence and toxicity of a fusarium mycotoxin, zearalenone. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;60:2710-2729.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2019.1655388

  23. 23.

    Songsermsakul P., Sontag G., Cichnamarkl M., Zentek J., Razzazifazeli E. Determination of zearalenone and its metabolites in urine, plasma and faeces of horses by HPLC–APCI–MS. J. Chromatogr. B. 2006;843:252-261.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.06.012

  24. 24.

    Zhang G.-L., Feng Y.-L., Song J.-L., Zhou X.-S. Zearalenone: A Mycotoxin With Different Toxic Effect in Domestic and Laboratory Animals’ Granulosa Cells. Front. Genet. 2018;9:667.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2018.00667

  25. 25.

    Böswald C., Engelhardt G., Vogel H., Wallnöfer P.R. Metabolism of the Fusarium mycotoxins zearalenone and deoxynivalenol by yeast strains of technological relevance. Nat. Toxins. 1995;3:138-144.

    Not in our library10.1002/nt.2620030304

  26. 26.

    Chang X., Liu H., Sun J., Wang J., Zhao C., Zhang W., Zhang J., Sun C. Zearalenone Removal from Corn Oil by an Enzymatic Strategy. Toxins. 2020;12:117.

    Not in our library10.3390/toxins12020117

  27. 27.

    Sprynskyy M., Gadzała-Kopciuch R., Nowak K., Buszewski M. Removal zearalenone toxin from synthetics gastric and body flfluids using talc and diatomite: A batch kinetic study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2012;94:7-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.024

  28. 28.

    Regulation of the European Commission (EC). No. 1881/2006 of December 19, 2006, as Amended d. Fixing Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs (OJ. L. 364/5 of 20.12.2006, Annex “Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in fooDstuffs”. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2006;364:5-24.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the Presence of Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone, Ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and Fumonisins in Products Intended for Animal Nutrition (2006/576/EC as Amended) (OJ. L./229/7). Off. J. Eur. Union. 2006;229:7-9.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Zinedine A., Ruiz M.-J. Zearalenone. Mycotoxins Implic. Food Safety. 2014;52-66.

    Not in our library10.4155/ebo.13.660

  31. 31.

    Fink-Gremmels J., Malekinejad H. Clinical effects and biochemical mechanisms associated with exposure to the mycoestrogen zearalenone. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2007;137:326-341.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.008

  32. 32.

    Prelusky D.B., Scott P.M., Trenholm H.L., Lawrence G.A. Minimal transmission of zearalenone to milk of dairy cows. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part B. 1990;25:87-103.

    Not in our library10.1080/03601239009372678

  33. 33.

    Coffey R., Cummins E., Ward S. Exposure assessment of mycotoxins in dairy milk. Food Control. 2009;20:239-249.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.05.011

  34. 34.

    Domijan A.-M., Peraica M., Cvjetković B., Turčin S., Jurjević Ž., Ivić D. Mould contamination and co-occurrence of mycotoxins in maize grain in Croatia. Acta Pharm. 2005;55:349-356.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Scudamore K.A., Patel S. Occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in maize imported into the UK, 2004–2007. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2009;26:363-371.

    Not in our library10.1080/02652030802406219

  36. 36.

    Manova R., MLadenova R. Incidence of zearalenone and fumonisins in Bulgarian cereal production. Food Control. 2009;20:362-365.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.06.001

  37. 37.

    Zinedine A., Brera C., Elakhdari S., Catano C., Debegnach F., Angelini S., De Santis B., Faid M., BenlemLih M., Minardi V., et al. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals and spices commercialized in Morocco. Food Control. 2006;17:868-874.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.06.001

  38. 38.

    Schollenberger M., Müller H.-M., Rüfle M., Suchy S., Plank S., Drochner W. Natural Occurrence of 16 Fusarium Toxins in Grains and Feedstuffs of Plant Origin from Germany. Mycopathologia. 2006;161:43-52.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11046-005-0199-7

  39. 39.

    Roigé M.B., Aranguren S.M., Riccio M.B., Pereyra S., Soraci A.L., Tapia M.O. Mycobiota and mycotoxins in fermented feed, wheat grains and corn grains in Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2009;26:233-237.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.riam.2009.03.003

  40. 40.

    Cano-Sancho G., Marin S., Ramos A.J., Sanchis V. Occurrence of zearalenone, an oestrogenic mycotoxin, in Catalonia (Spain) and exposure assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012;50:835-839.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.049

All 93 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.