Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Comparison Analysis between Real Accident Locations and Simulated Risk Areas in An Urban Road Network

Giuseppe Guido, Alessandro Vitale, Vittorio Astarita and 1 more

Safety · 2019

doi:10.3390/safety5030060 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Recently, many researchers have employed a microsimulation technique to study the chain of interactions among vehicles, which generates an accident occurrence in some circumstances. This new approach to studying road safety is named traffic conflict technique. The aim of this paper is to assess how the microscopic simulation is a useful tool to identify potentially unsafe vehicle interactions and how high-risk locations identified by a microsimulation technique are similar to the ones identified by using historical accident data. Results show that high-risk locations identified by the simulation framework are superimposable to those identified by using the historical accident database. In particular, the statistical analysis employed based on Pearson’s correlation demonstrates a significative correspondence between a risk rate defined with simulation and an accident rate determined by the observed accidents dataset.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References26

    26 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.