Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

A Monte Carlo-Based Outlier Diagnosis Method for Sensitivity Analysis

Vinicius Francisco Rofatto, Marcelo Tomio Matsuoka, Ivandro Klein and 2 more

Remote Sensing · 2020

doi:10.3390/rs12050860 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

An iterative outlier elimination procedure based on hypothesis testing, commonly known as <i>Iterative Data Snooping</i> (<i>IDS</i>) among geodesists, is often used for the quality control of modern measurement systems in geodesy and surveying. The test statistic associated with <i>IDS</i> is the extreme normalised least-squares residual. It is well-known in the literature that critical values (quantile values) of such a test statistic cannot be derived from well-known test distributions but must be computed numerically by means of Monte Carlo. This paper provides the first results on the Monte Carlo-based critical value inserted into different scenarios of correlation between outlier statistics. From the Monte Carlo evaluation, we compute the probabilities of correct identification, missed detection, wrong exclusion, over-identifications and statistical overlap associated with <i>IDS</i> in the presence of a single outlier. On the basis of such probability levels, we obtain the Minimal Detectable Bias (MDB) and Minimal Identifiable Bias (MIB) for cases in which <i>IDS</i> is in play. The MDB and MIB are sensitivity indicators for outlier detection and identification, respectively. The results show that there are circumstances in which the larger the Type I decision error (smaller critical value), the higher the rates of outlier detection but the lower the rates of outlier identification. In such a case, the larger the Type I Error, the larger the ratio between the MIB and MDB. We also highlight that an outlier becomes identifiable when the contributions of the measures to the wrong exclusion rate decline simultaneously. In this case, we verify that the effect of the correlation between outlier statistics on the wrong exclusion rate becomes insignificant for a certain outlier magnitude, which increases the probability of identification.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References84

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 84 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.