Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations

Rajesh Janardanan, Shamil Maksyutov, Aki Tsuruta and 20 more

Remote Sensing · 2020

doi:10.3390/rs12030375 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

We employed a global high-resolution inverse model to optimize the CH<sub>4</sub> emission using Greenhouse gas Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and surface observation data for a period from 2011&#8722;2017 for the two main source categories of anthropogenic and natural emissions. We used the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v4.3.2) for anthropogenic methane emission and scaled them by country to match the national inventories reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Wetland and soil sink prior fluxes were simulated using the Vegetation Integrative Simulator of Trace gases (VISIT) model. Biomass burning prior fluxes were provided by the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS). We estimated a global total anthropogenic and natural methane emissions of 340.9 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup> and 232.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>, respectively. Country-scale analysis of the estimated anthropogenic emissions showed that all the top-emitting countries showed differences with their respective inventories to be within the uncertainty range of the inventories, confirming that the posterior anthropogenic emissions did not deviate from nationally reported values. Large countries, such as China, Russia, and the United States, had the mean estimated emission of 45.7 &#177; 8.6, 31.9 &#177; 7.8, and 29.8 &#177; 7.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>, respectively. For natural wetland emissions, we estimated large emissions for Brazil (39.8 &#177; 12.4 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>), the United States (25.9 &#177; 8.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>), Russia (13.2 &#177; 9.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>), India (12.3 &#177; 6.4 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>), and Canada (12.2 &#177; 5.1 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup>). In both emission categories, the major emitting countries all had the model corrections to emissions within the uncertainty range of inventories. The advantages of the approach used in this study were: (1) use of high-resolution transport, useful for simulations near emission hotspots, (2) prior anthropogenic emissions adjusted to the UNFCCC reports, (3) combining surface and satellite observations, which improves the estimation of both natural and anthropogenic methane emissions over spatial scale of countries.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.