Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update

Muhammad Sohail Zafar

Polymers · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/polym12102299

Abstract

A wide range of polymers are commonly used for various applications in prosthodontics. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is commonly used for prosthetic dental applications, including the fabrication of artificial teeth, denture bases, dentures, obturators, orthodontic retainers, temporary or provisional crowns, and for the repair of dental prostheses. Additional dental applications of PMMA include occlusal splints, printed or milled casts, dies for treatment planning, and the embedding of tooth specimens for research purposes. The unique properties of PMMA, such as its low density, aesthetics, cost-effectiveness, ease of manipulation, and tailorable physical and mechanical properties, make it a suitable and popular biomaterial for these dental applications. To further improve the properties (thermal properties, water sorption, solubility, impact strength, flexural strength) of PMMA, several chemical modifications and mechanical reinforcement techniques using various types of fibers, nanoparticles, and nanotubes have been reported recently. The present article comprehensively reviews various aspects and properties of PMMA biomaterials, mainly for prosthodontic applications. In addition, recent updates and modifications to enhance the physical and mechanical properties of PMMA are also discussed.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

A wide range of polymers are commonly used for various applications in clinical dentistry. Amongst these, poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a polymer that is most commonly used in dental laboratories (to make orthodontic retainers and dentures and for repair), dental clinics (for relining dentures and temporary crowns), and industry (such as fabrication of artificial teeth). Regardless of the intended application, PMMA is conventionally available in the form of a powder–liquid system. The powder contains a clear polymer (PMMA), however additives such as pigments and nylon or acrylic synthetic fibers are added to adjust the physical properties and aesthetics to mimic oral tissues (such as gums, mucosa). The liquid component contains a monomer of methyl methacrylate, along with cross-linking agents and inhibitors.

PMMA gained popularity for various dental applications due to its unique properties, including its low density, aesthetics, cost-effectiveness, ease of manipulation, and tailorable physical and mechanical properties. Although there are a number of concerns associated with using PMMA, such as the fracture of dentures due to water sorption and poor impact and flexural strength, the ongoing research has introduced a variety of modifications to overcome and further improve its properties (such as its conductivity, water sorption, solubility, impact and flexural strengths). For example, several studies reported the improvement of PMMA materials while reinforced using a variety of fibers, nanoparticles, and nanotubes. Similarly, PMMA-based biocomposites with the addition of epoxy resins, polyamide, or butadiene styrene have been reported to improve the impact strength of PMMA. The aim of the present article is to review various aspects of PMMA as a biomaterial for various dental applications. In addition, recent updates and modifications that have improved the material properties of PMMA are discussed.

2. Historical Background and Development

PMMA is an odorless polymer of acrylic acid that was reported by Redtenbacher for the first time in 1843. However, the development of PMMA for biomedical applications was a gradual process spread over a period of decades. Key stages during the development of PMMA for dental applications are shown in the Table 1. Since the 1940s, PMMA has become an essential biomaterial for dental laboratories and clinics.

Due to the acquired properties, such as the ease of processing, acceptable mechanical properties, aesthetics, cost-effectiveness, and relatively lower toxicity, PMMA has replaced previously used denture base materials (Table 2). All previously used denture base materials had certain disadvantages, and the search for an ideal denture base material is still ongoing. During the last half of 20th century, PMMA not only took over other denture base materials but also obtained remarkable popularity for the manufacturing of various dental and maxillofacial prostheses, including obturators, dentures, temporary crowns, and bridges,.

However, PMMA is not an ideal material due to discrepancies in its physical and mechanical characteristics. For instance, PMMA absorbs water, which may compromise its physical and mechanical properties while in use and make it vulnerable to failure under cyclic loading. Currently, a number of researchers are focused on mechanical reinforcement and chemical modification of PMMA to overcome its drawbacks and improve its properties, which have been reviewed in this article. In order to better understand and interpret these recent modifications, it is important to understand the chemistry, types, and properties of PMMA materials.

3. Chemistry and Types of PMMA

PMMA (IUPAC name: poly [1-(methoxy carbonyl)-1-methyl ethylene]) is a synthetic polymer prepared by the free radical addition and polymerization of methyl methacrylate (C5O2H8) to poly methyl methacrylate (C5O2H8)n. The polymerization reaction is initiated and activated by generating a free radical either chemically or with energy (such as heat, light, microwaves). In the propagation stage, the activated polymerization continues via the binding of monomers followed by termination through shifting of the free electrons to the chain end.

There are various mechanisms that can terminate the polymerization reaction, such as the addition of chemical inhibitors (hydroquinone or methyl-ether) to the monomer. Similarly, any impurities present in the monomer may inhibit the polymerization by reacting with the free radicals. According to the American Dental Association (ADA) Specification No. 12, the denture base polymers are classified into various types and classes (Figure 1). Based on the activation of the polymerization reaction, there are three main types of denture base polymers, which may differ from each other in terms of their polymerization reactions and compositions (Figure 1).

In addition to types I, II, and III (based on ADA specifications), the ISO 20795-1 2013 further included light-activated (type IV) and microwave-cured (type V) polymers. The characteristics of various types of PMMA denture base materials are compared in the following section.

3.1. Heat-Cured PMMA

Heat curing PMMA materials are available in powder and liquid forms and commonly used for making denture bases and dentures. PMMA powder contains PMMA, benzoyl peroxide initiator, a plasticizer (dibutyl phthalate), opacifiers (titanium and zinc oxides), fibers, and pigments or dyes. The liquid component contains methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as a cross-linking agent, and hydroquinone as an inhibitor. The polymerization reaction starts upon mixing of both components and requires heat energy (such as from a water bath) to activate the initiator. These materials contain benzoyl peroxide as an initiator, which dissociates into carbon dioxide (CO2), generating free radicals upon heating. A high degree of polymerization results in good physical properties; however, polymerization and poor adaptation remain the main concerns. Various combinations of heat curing cycles can be used for both compression and injection molding (Table 3).

The typical heat curing cycle involves a longer curing time (~9 h at 74 °C); alternatively, rapid-heat-polymerized PMMA requires a significantly shorter (20 min at 100 °C) curing time. The polymerization process in the latter type is accelerated due to the presence of heat and chemically activated initiators in the composition. The main purpose of the heating cycle is to achieve a high degree of polymerization and decrease residual monomers in the cured prothesis.

3.2. Microwave-Cured PMMA

Microwave energy is another source of heat energy that can be used to polymerize and cure PMMA. Instead of using a conventional water bath, a source of microwave energy and a non-metallic denture flask are required to polymerize these denture base materials. Microwave curing has the main benefit of time effectiveness due to a short curing time (three minutes) at 500 w in a microwave, as compared to the conventional heat curing cycle, which require hours of heating followed by a cooling down period. The physical properties, including the dimensional accuracy of microwave PMMA materials, are comparable to conventional heat-cured PMMA. A previous study compared conventional heat-cured PMMA, injection-molded PMMA, and compression-molded and microwave-cured PMMA. It was reported that the impact and flexural strengths of injection-molded, microwave-cured PMMA were inferior to conventional heat-cured PMMA. The benzoyl peroxide initiator is not present in microwave-cured PMMA, so therefore these materials cannot be cured using a conventional water bath heating cycle. The main limitation of the microwave-cured PMMA materials is their weak bond strength with the acrylic teeth, which limits their prosthodontic applications. In addition, the equipment and non-metallic flasks are comparatively expensive and are likely to fracture following cyclic loadings with excessive packing pressure.

3.3. Cold-Cured PMMA

Cold-cured PMMA (also known as chemically cured or auto-polymerizing PMMA) has a distinct composition and mechanism of polymerization compared to heat-cured PMMA and does not require thermal energy. A tertiary amine initiator such as dimethyl-p-toluidine is added to the cold-cured PMMA, which activates the benzyl peroxide, chemically generating free radicals to initiate the polymerization. However, the degree of polymerization of cold-cured PMMA is remarkably lower than heat-cured PMMA, leaving uncured residual monomers in the polymerized material, which tend to leach out. Compared with heat-cured PMMA, the main advantages of cold-cured PMMA include its better dimensional stability and adaptation, resulting in minor polymerization shrinkage however a lesser degree of polymerization. However, the poor degree of polymerization compromises the mechanical properties, such as the strength and hardness. In addition to monomer leaching and inferior mechanical properties, the amine initiator oxidizes with time, resulting in discoloration, poor color stability, and lower glass transition temperature. Due to these limitations, currently cold-cured PMMA materials are only used for fabricating custom trays and provisional partial dentures and for denture repair. Recently, Alqahtani modified cold-cured PMMA to improve the mechanical properties. The addition of a hexagonal boron nitride nanopowder enhanced the elastic modulus and bending strength, while adding zirconia (ZrO2) increased the surface hardness. Furthermore, it was speculated that the hybrid reinforcement using ZrO2 and hexagonal boron nitride may remarkably improve the strength and stiffness of PMMA for durable fabrication of crowns, fixed dentures, and repairs. Due to the presence of a greater amount of residual monomers and the heat resulting from exothermic polymerization, cold-cured PMMA materials are not considered for long-term oral applications.

3.4. Light-Cured PMMA

Light-cured (also known as visible-light-cured) PMMA works similarly to the resin-based restorative composites, which are cured when exposed to visible light. The PMMA is modified by replacing the conventional initiator with a photo-sensitive agent (camphorquinone), which is activated and generates free radicals upon exposure to light. The light-cured PMMA materials are supplied in pre-mixed form containing PMMA fillers, silica, urethane dimethacrylate matrix, and acrylic resin monomers. To cure PMMA completely, the materials must be exposed to visible light for the required duration of time following adaptation in the cast and teeth placement. Following the polymerization, the light-cured PMMA can be finished and polished similarly to conventional heat-cured PMMA. The light-cured PMMA has the advantages of easier fabrication and allowing full control over of curing, providing sufficient time for the manipulation and adaptation before initiating the polymerization. Additionally, polymerization shrinkage, the existence of residual monomers, and bacterial adhesion are reduced compared to with heat- and cold-cured PMMA materials, which are the potential benefits of light-cured PMMA. However, light-cured PMMA materials are not used commonly due to their drawbacks, such as their limited curing depth, technique sensitivity, and cost. The mechanical properties of light-cured PMMA materials are slightly inferior to conventional PMMA, and therefore their applications are limited to relining and repair of denture bases, in addition to fabrication of custom trays and base plates for complete dentures. It is obvious that each type of PMMA material differs in terms of its composition, polymerization, benefits, and drawbacks. Accordingly, no single type can be labelled as the superior material for all dental applications. Therefore, dental teams should consider the characteristics and suitability of each type of PMMA when selecting a material for a specific application.

4. Manipulation

The majority of PMMA formulations are supplied as polymeric powders and colorless monomer liquids (Figure 2a and Figure 2b, respectively). The exothermic chemical reaction starts upon mixing of the PMMA powder and liquid, which harden either chemically (cold cure) or via energy application in the case of heat-cured PMMA materials. The typical process of PMMA polymerization (initiation, activation, propagations, and termination) is described in Section 3. To avoid any discrepancies, it is necessary to use the recommended ratio of PMMA powder and liquid (2.5:1 w/v or 3–3.5:1 v/v). In the case of a high powder-to-liquid ratio, this means that not all of the PMMA beads will be wet, leading to a granular texture, while a low powder-to-liquid ratio enhances polymerization shrinkage and dimensional changes. Depending on the consistency, the manipulation of PMMA mixing can be divided into distinct stages (such as sandy, stringy, doughy, rubbery, and stiff stages), which are followed by packing and finishing of denture bases (Figure 2).

The mixing process starts with the sandy stage (Figure 2c), in which the monomer wets the PMMA granules, giving the mixture a grainy appearance. There is hardly any chemically interaction or polymerization during this stage. In the stringy stage, the monomer molecules attack and dissolve PMMA particles and disperse the polymer chains in the liquid phase. At the same time, the larger PMMA particles begin to unfold and enhance the viscosity. Typically, the stringy stage is characterized by formation of sticky strings upon touching or stretching (Figure 2d,e), further progresses to the doughy stage (Figure 2f). However, the mixture still contains a number of undissolved polymer chains. This stage is characterized by the loss of stringiness and stickiness. In addition, the mixture in the doughy stage is considered suitable for packing into a dental flask (Figure 2f). The dough-forming time (from mixing to doughy stage) is affected by various factors, such as the polymer’s molecular weight, the particle size and surface area, temperature, the presence of a cross-linking agent or plasticizer, and the powder–liquid ratio. The doughy stage progress to the rubbery stage by further conversion of monomers into polymers and evaporation of the residual monomers. This stage is characterized by the rubbery appearance of the matrix (which rebounds after releasing compressive or tensile stresses) and its inability to be packed into the compression molds. In the stiff stage, the continuation of polymerization and further evaporation of monomers results in hardening and reinforcement of mechanical properties (Figure 2g). The polymerized PMMA become dry, stiff, and resistant to plastic deformation. Alternatively, PMMA powder and monomers can be mixed using ultrasonic mixing. Although the ultrasonic mixing of modified PMMA has been shown to be superior in terms of texture and packing, its use is limited in dental laboratories due to the requirement of additional equipment and the associated costs.

For the prosthesis fabrication, the PMMA in the dough stage is packed into specialized dental flasks under compression. Due to the method’s accuracy and cost-effectiveness, compression molding is frequently used for producing heat-cured PMMA prostheses. The dental flask packed with PMMA is heated in a water bath under the defined time and temperature conditions (Table 3). To ensure proper polymerization, the temperature of the water bath should be increased gradually. Immersion of the dental flask directly into boiling water results in evaporation of the monomer (boiling point 100.3 °C) prior to polymerization and enhanced porosity in the cured material. Alternatively, the injection molding technique can also be used to fabricate dentures, which requires the use of specially designed dental flasks with a sprue. The denture base material is injected through the sprue hole while the vent hole facilitates the escape of hot gasses. Following the injection of heat-cured PMMA, the heat curing process is started. The polymerization shrinkage is compensated for by continuously injecting the PMMA during the curing process. For both compression and injection molding, similar heat curing cycles can be used, as shown in Table 3. Considering the mismatch of the thermal expansion coefficients of PMMA and investment plaster, it is advised to cool down the dental flask to room temperature gradually to avoid distortion of the denture base. It is recommended to remove the flask from the water bath to allow bench cooling for half an hour, followed by immersion in tap water (15 min) prior to opening. The PMMA dentures should be finished and polished before use in the oral cavity.

5. Properties of PMMA

The PMMA-based materials should have certain desired properties depending on the biological application. Accordingly, PMMA materials have been extensively modified and explored in relation to various chemical, biological, physical, and mechanical properties. Primarily, it is important to understand the ideal or desired properties of PMMA materials for denture base applications (Figure 3).

Prosthodontic restorations need to be performed in complex oral environments (biofunctionality) without exerting any adverse effects on the surrounding tissues. Therefore, the PMMA used for denture base materials should be biocompatible and should not cause any irritation, toxicity, or mutagenicity to the oral tissues. Chemically, PMMA needs to be highly insoluble in saliva and oral fluids. It should be non-reactive to nutrients, however should chemically bond to artificial teeth. Additionally, the PMMA should have good mechanical properties (such as high elastic modulus, proportional limit, resilience, fatigue strength, and impact strength) to withstand the forces of mastication without failure. In addition, other properties such as having low specific gravity (light weight), thermal conductivity, ease of cleaning, and low cost are favorable for patient comfort. The key properties of PMMA are presented in the Table 4 and discussed in the following sections.

5.1. Biological Properties of PMMA

Biocompatibility is the most important biological property, which is defined as a material’s ability to perform in a biological environment with a favorable host response. Although there are very limited biocompatibility issues for properly fabricated heat-cured PMMA, the presence of uncured or residual monomers in the cured denture base has been reported to be associated with mucosal irritation, tissue inflammation, and cytotoxicity. Therefore, adding a larger amount of monomer solution while mixing PMMA leaves residual monomers and results in corresponding cytotoxicity. In addition to a low monomer–polymer ratio, an extended polymerization cycle also decreases the residual monomer quantity and cytotoxicity compared to short curing cycles. As a comparison, heat-cured and microwave-cured PMMA eluted significantly lower amounts of monomers and cytotoxicity compared to cold-cured PMMA. The immersion in water prior to use considerably reduced the residual monomer amount, as well as the cytotoxicity of PMMA. In addition to biocompatibility, the excessive amount of residual monomers is also directly related to the solubility of PMMA denture base materials, as the leaching of unreacted monomers enhances the degree of solubility. Therefore, the amount of residual monomers and the cytotoxicity of the PMMA denture base can be controlled by enhancing the degree of polymerization using heat-cured PMMA and the recommended heat curing cycle. Accordingly, properly cured PMMA materials with low amounts of monomers are likely to have good biocompatibility. The volatile nature of monomers and the dusty nature of the fine PMMA particles may result in professional hazards to the dental staff who are involved in the handling of this material. To reduce the concentration of monomer vapors and exposure in dental clinics and laboratories, appropriate safety measures such as the use of personal protection (mask, gloves) and airtight containers, good ventilation, and quick disposal of any spills should be practiced. In addition, dental staff should be educated about the toxic and volatile nature of monomer solution (no exposure to flames) and immediate washing of the skin if exposed to the monomer solution.

5.2. Physical Properties of PMMA

PMMA materials have favorable physical properties for denture base applications. Sorption (water or oral fluid uptake) takes place while they are immersed. Due to the molecular polarity, the water molecules infiltrate through the polymer chains and act as plasticizers. In addition, the penetrated water molecules lead to the expansion of the PMMA and affect the dimensional stability. Another related property is the solubility, which may affect the dimensional stability. Therefore, the sorption and associated solubility should be kept to a minimum. According to ISO 20795-1, the sorption and solubility should be less than 32 and 1.6 µg/mm3, respectively. Several studies have reported that the sorption and solubility of the currently available PMMA denture base materials are well below the required values required by ISO 20795-1. The sorption and solubility of heat-cured PMMA materials are lower compared to cold-cured PMMA materials. Considering that the sorption and solubility are directly associated with the residual monomer quantity present in the prosthesis, heat-cured PMMA materials demonstrate a greater degree of polymerization, less residual monomers, and better physical properties compared to cold-cured PMMA.

The denture base materials should have acceptable thermal conductivity to conduct the temperature of food to the patients’ oral tissues. However, the thermal conductivity of PMMA is low (5.7 × 10−4 °C·cm−1); therefore, heat produced during the denture fabrication is dissipated slowly and results in surface crazing. The low conductivity can also affect a patient’s ability to sense the food temperature as compared to metallic denture bases, which are highly conductive compared to PMMA. Hot drinks may reach the pharynx or esophagus without being noticed and may burn the delicate mucosa. To fulfill the aesthetic requirements, PMMA denture base materials should mimic the oral mucosa in terms of color, hue, and texture. Various transparent pigments can be added to PMMA to achieve provide good aesthetic properties, mimicking the patient’s natural tissues (Figure 2h). Additionally, the denture base materials should have high color stability and should not change (discolor) in the oral environment over time. However, PMMA-based materials have demonstrated poor color stability and tend to change while functioning due to several factors. The release of residual monomers enhances the water sorption and discoloration due to ingress of various molecules. Other factors associated with staining and color changes of PMMA include the fabrication porosity and periodic consumption of various beverages such as coffee, tea, carbonated drinks, and alcohol. Therefore, PMMA dentures may require replacement after a period of time due to inferior wear resistance, staining, and poor aesthetic properties.

The polymerization shrinkage (linear and volumetric) may result in remarkable dimensional changes and inaccuracies during denture fabrication. Therefore, the lowest level of polymerization shrinkage is desired for dental applications. Comparing various types of PMMA, light-cured PMMA has demonstrated lower amounts of residual monomers and less polymerization shrinkage compared to heat- and cold-cured PMMA materials. In terms of heat-cured PMMA, the injection molding technique has been suggested to reduce polymerization shrinkage and improve the marginal seal, as compared to conventional compression molding. In the injection molding technique, continuous injection of the PMMA compensates for the polymerization shrinkage. Additionally, various modifications of PMMA, such as reinforcement using fibers or carbon nanotubes, can remarkably decrease the polymerization shrinkage and dimensional accuracy of the dental prostheses. Radiopacity is another physical property that is ideally required in restorative dental materials. Radiopaque restorative materials appear white and can easily be distinguished from tissues in diagnostic radiographs. For example, in case a broken piece of a denture is accidently swallowed, radiopaque objects can be detected easily. Due to its polymeric nature, PMMA is a radiolucent material that is hard to detect in radiographs. Inducing radiopacity by modification is challenging, as most heavy metal salts are not compatible with PMMA. The incorporation of various heavy metals has been explored to enhance the radiopacity. Although various modifications have improved the radiopacity of PMMA to some extent, there are certain concerns, such as a lack of physical or chemical binding of additives to the matrix and the salts being prone to leaching out of the denture base. Similarly, adding heavy metal salts improved the radiopacity in one study, however various properties, including the polishability, bonding strength, and aesthetic properties, were significantly affected. In contrast, Lang et al. incorporated triphenylbismuth (30% w/w) into PMMA and reported sufficient radiopacity without compromising the mechanical and aesthetic properties. The modification of PMMA materials by adding radiopaque agents without compromising the aesthetic and mechanical properties is challenging and requires further research.

5.3. Mechanical Properties of PMMA

Denture base materials are exposed to complex masticatory stresses in the oral cavity. Therefore, good mechanical properties are required for the functional performance of denture base materials (biofunctionality). Considering the significance of the mechanical properties, several modifications have been reported for various mechanical properties of PMMA, including its flexural strength, impact strength, fracture toughness, and surface hardness. The flexural strength (also known as the modulus of rupture or transverse strength) is assessed using a 3-point bending test according to the guidelines of ISO 20795-1. Ideally, the denture base should have a high flexural strength to bear the complex forces of mastication without permanent deformation or fracture. A number of studies have investigated flexural strength using various methods and types of PMMA. Barbrosa et al. reported good flexural strength for heat-cured, cold-cured, and microwave-cured PMMA (92.84 ± 4.73, 84.40 ± 1.68, and 109.63 ± 5.31 MPa, respectively). The immersion of PMMA in water for a longer time decreased the flexural strength, resulting in increased water sorption. In addition, the flexural strength of denture base PMMA can be affected by several factors, including the curing method, chemical composition, degree of polymerization, dimensions, and storage.

Although the flexural strength demonstrates a material’s ability to withstand tensile, compressive, and shear stresses, the fracture toughness and impact strength of PMMA are also important for denture base applications. The fracture toughness describes a material’s ability to resist crack propagation due to notches or defects present in the surface. The fracture toughness of heat-cured PMMA (2.06 ± 0.17 MN/m3/2) is significantly greater than cold-cured PMMA (1.63 ± 0.1 MN/m3/2), regardless of the testing methodology. Therefore, heat-cured PMMA performs better in inhibiting crack propagation and fracture. The impact strength describes the amount of impact energy required to cause a fracture. High impact strength is desired to prevent the fracture of dentures when exposed to a high impact force, such as accidental dropping. The impact strength of a denture base can be remarkably reduced by the presence of tiny surface defects as a result of wear and tear. Even a micron-sized surface defect may act as a notch for crack propagation and fracture. Certain additives, such as butadiene styrene, can significantly improve the impact strength, however they may affect other properties, such as the hardness and modulus of elasticity. The wear resistance of currently available PMMA materials is significantly lower compered to casting alloys and dental porcelains. The wear resistance is directly related to the material’s surface hardness, which is lower in case of PMMA compared to casting alloys and dental porcelains. Therefore, further improvements in the mechanical properties of PMMA are desired, particularly the impact strength, flexural strength, hardness, and wear resistance.

5.4. Chemical Properties of PMMA

Ideally, the denture base materials should be highly insert and chemically non-reactive with oral fluids and nutrients. During function, the denture base materials are exposed to a variety of nutrients, which may drastically vary in terms multiple factors, including their chemical nature, pH, and temperature. Chemically, PMMA materials are organic resins that are negligibly soluble in water, however their solubility is high in organic solvents (such as ketones and esters). Similarly, alcoholic solutions act as plasticizers and may reduce the glass transition temperature. Therefore, storage or cleaning of dentures using alcoholic solutions should be avoided. Although PMMA does not chemically react with water, repetitive storage in water may result in dimensional changes or crazing due to cyclic water sorption and drying. Cross-linking agents (such as ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and 1,4-butylene glycol dimethacrylate) are commonly added to PMMA. The cross-linking agents are beneficial by reducing the tendency of PMMA to solubilize in organic solvents and enhance its resistance to crazing.

In addition, cross-linkers diminish the formation of oxygen inhibition layers and residual monomers in polymerized materials. The currently available PMMA denture base materials have demonstrated satisfactory chemical stability in the oral cavity.

Based on the above discussion, it is evident that PMMA fulfills most of the requirements. including having good biocompatibility and physical and mechanical properties. The main concern remains the presence of residual monomers, which are released from the materials and jeopardize various properties, including the biocompatibility. Although heat-cured PMMA has demonstrated good mechanical strength and durability, fractured dentures are commonly reported in dental clinics, mainly due to poor impact strength, brittleness, and careless handling or accidental falls. Considering their good chemical stability and fracture toughness, PMMA dentures perform very well in the oral cavity for a reasonable period of time. The addition of various fibers and particles to PMMA may further reinforce its mechanical properties (Section 7). A number of shortcomings, such as the unfavourable thermal properties (low thermal conductivity or diffusivity, high coefficient of thermal expansion), brittleness, monomer leaching, and discoloration, still require improvement and further investigations. Overall, PMMA has the benefits of easy manipulation; cost-effectiveness; and good mechanical, physical, and aesthetic properties. Therefore, PMMA materials are commonly used for denture applications.

6. Applications of PMMA

Polymeric acrylic materials are widely used for a range of applications in multiple fields, including engineering, healthcare, and dentistry (Figure 4). In addition to denture bases, other oral healthcare applications for PMMA include fabrication of artificial teeth, impression trays, temporary crowns, obturators for cleft palates, occlusal splints, printed or milled casts, dies for treatment planning, denture relining, and repair (Figure 4), which have been discussed.

6.1. Denture Bases, Liners, and Reliners

The alveolar bone is a dynamic tissue that undergoes continuous remodeling under physiological conditions. The remodeling of alveolar bone alters the morphology of bone and denture bearing areas. A recent study reported a significantly greater resorption of the alveolar ridge in denture wearing patients compared to those who were edentulous but not wearing dentures. The time-dependent alterations in the alveolar bone and the denture bearing tissues result in ill-fitting dentures, which then requiring relining to re-attain proper fit and stability. Accordingly, denture relining restores the vertical dimensions, retention, and stability of the old denture. Depending on the surface hardness, the lining materials are divided into hard liners such as PMMA; and resilient liners. The resilient liners are elastic and composed of silicone elastomers, which act as shock absorber. Both heat- and cold-cured PMMA materials are used for the relining of dentures (hard relining), using the old denture as an impression tray. Heat-cured PMMA liners are usually supplied in the form of powder and liquid modified with the addition of plasticizers to reduce the glass transition temperature by to lubricating the polymer chains. Consequently, the PMMA material becomes comparatively flexible and resilient. The characteristic properties of PMMA liners are lost with time due to the leaching of plasticizers and increased stiffness. Cold-cured PMMA liners also can be used, which can allow chairside application without requiring laboratory work. However, due to their poor mechanical properties, leaching of monomers, and associated biocompatibility issues, their use is limited to temporary liners only. In contrast, heat-cured PMMA liners have demonstrated good bonding strength and wear resistance. However, the loss of plasticizers results in roughening of the surface, making the liners hard, and difficult to clean.

6.2. Artificial Teeth

Acrylic (PMMA) teeth are fabricated at an industrial scale using compression or injection molding techniques. Prefabricated teeth are supplied in a variety of tooth morphologies, sizes, and shades (Figure 4c). Once the artificial teeth have been matched to a patient’s natural teeth (regarding the color, shape), they are contoured to fit the denture base through chemical bonding. Acrylic teeth have excellent biocompatibility, and good physical, mechanical, and aesthetic properties. In contrast to heat-cured PMMA, acrylic teeth have high resilience and flexibility, and therefore are less brittle and easier to polish. Compared with porcelain teeth, acrylic teeth are lightweight and do not cause clicking sounds or wear of the opposing teeth. In addition, acrylic teeth are dimensionally stable and have a coefficient of thermal expansion matching that of the denture base. Although acrylic teeth bond chemically with the denture base, the poor bond strength and debonding remain the main concerns. A significant proportion of broken dentures (22–30%) involve debonding of acrylic teeth (mainly anterior teeth) due to having a smaller bonding surface area and the direction of functional stresses. Various studies have investigated surface treatments in improving the adhesion of acrylic teeth.. The application of methyl-methacrylate–based adhesives at the interface improves the bonding strength of acrylic teeth. Similarly, the surface treatment of acrylic teeth surfaces by grinding and sandblasting increases the bond strength with the denture base. The hardness, elastic modulus, and wear resistance of PMMA teeth are poor compared to the natural teeth or porcelain restorations, leading to rapid wear of PMMA teeth. Recently, silanized, feldspar-reinforced PMMA was compared with conventional acrylic teeth. The addition of silanized feldspar improved these properties (elastic modulus, hardness, and flexural strength) without compromising the impact strength. Similar results were reported by adding silica fillers, however the flexural strength was reduced.

6.3. Temporary Crowns and Bridges

The fabrication of ceramic or metal–ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures involves time-consuming laboratory procedures, which may take several days to complete. Therefore, temporary restoration materials made from PMMA are commonly used to cover the prepared teeth until the fabrication of the ceramic restoration material is complete. PMMA temporary restoration materials can be prepared in significantly shorted periods of time, either chair-side using cold-cured PMMA or in the laboratory using heat-cured PMMA. Although PMMA is commonly used for temporary crowns and bridges, the rigidity and fracture toughness is not sufficient to withstand complex masticatory forces. Because of the weak mechanical properties and abrasion resistance, the use of PMMA is restricted to temporary crowns and fixed bridges for a transitional period. As discussed earlier, heat-cured PMMA presents better properties compared to cold-cured PMMA. Furthermore, the polymerization of PMMA is an exothermic reaction that releases a magnificent amount of heat, which should be considered when using cold-cured PMMA in clinics. Although dentin is a good insulator of heat, the heat from the exothermic reaction may still reach and damage the underlying pulp, especially if the dentin thickness is less than 1 mm. The thermal damage can be minimized using either an air–water spray as a coolant or a refrigerated putty matrix as a heat sink. Alternatively, temporary crowns and fixed dentures for vital teeth can be fabricated via indirect approaches using heat-cured PMMA, which has better mechanical and physical properties. Cold-cured PMMA restoration materials contain uncured residual monomers (3–5%) at significantly higher levels than heat-cured PMMA (0.2–0.5%). The residual monomers may release into the oral environment and potentially irritate oral tissues. For this application, one of the main disadvantages is the polymerization shrinkage, which equals 5–7% volumetric shrinkage linearly (~2%); this may lead to potential discrepancies in the fit of restoration materials, as well as microleakage. All such shortcomings should be considered while using PMMA for direct restorations in the oral cavity.

6.4. Repair of Dentures

Fractured dentures requiring repair are commonly reported in dental clinics. The main reasons for denture fracture include the poor mechanical properties of PMMA or accidental falls. The repair of dentures is expensive and time-consuming. In contrast, denture repair maintains the denture’s dimensions and aesthetic characteristics. Various types of PMMA materials are used for denture repair. Although heat-cured PMMA has better mechanical properties, the head curing procedure is time-consuming, with warpage of dentures due to reheating being the main concern. Accordingly, cold-cured PMMA is favored for denture repair applications. Various modifications to PMMA materials can improve their strength for denture repair, with promising outcomes. For example, the incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles improved the flexural strength of PMMA repair materials. Previous studies have investigated light-cured PMMA for denture repair and reported several benefits, such as ease of manipulation, controlled polymerization time, no monomer issues, and better mechanical properties. The repair strength of light-cured PMMA (40–44 MPa) is remarkably superior compared to heat-cured (21–34 MPa) and cold-cured (~13MPa) PMMA materials. In addition to the types of PMMA, various surface treatments, such as airborne abrasion using alumina particles, laser treatment, mechanical grinding with a bur, and immersion in a monomer solution or organic solvents, may affect the repair strength of dentures.

6.5. Obturators

An obturator is a special prosthesis that is constructed to restore lost maxillary tissues (Figure 4h) and functional capabilities (mastication, deglutition, speech, aesthetics) following a maxillectomy. Despite advancements being made in materials science, there are only a few material choices for the construction of obturators. PMMA materials are the most commonly used materials for obturators. To overcome polymerization shrinkage, the injection molding technique has been advocated due to it providing better marginal sealing and accuracy compared to conventional compression molding. There are certain disadvantages of PMMA obturators, such as polymerization shrinkage, difficulty with undercuts due to the material’s rigidity, or pressure sores on delicate tissues that have recently been exposed to the oral environment. Depending on the size of the defect, the PMMA obturators may become heavy. The weight can be reduced by using either a hollow design or silicon core.

6.6. Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) PMMA

The CAD/CAM technologies are used for the fabrication of various ceramic restorations, including inlays, onlays, crowns, and fixed partial dentures. More recently, several researchers investigated the use of CAD/CAM technologies for the fabrication of PMMA dental prostheses and compared the materials’ properties and various aspects of the conventional and CAD/CAM PMMA materials. In contrast to the conventional “flask–pack–press” technique, CAD/CAM techniques commonly use rapid prototyping and milling techniques. Although the chemistry of CAD/CAM PMMA is similar to that of conventional heat-cured PMMA, CAD/CAM PMMA shows superiority in terms of many properties, including its hardness, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and impact strength (Table 5). Both materials are equally biocompatible and without any significant differences in terms of monomer leaching. The CAD/CAM PMMA mechanical properties and durability are improved compared to heat-cured PMMA (Table 5).

Interestingly, the adherence of fungal Candida albicans was remarkably reduced in CAD/CAM dentures, resulting in enhanced hydrophobicity and surface properties. The increased hydrophobicity inhibits plaque accumulation on the polymer surface. Therefore, due to the inhibition of Candida albicans attachment, CAD/CAM PMMA dentures may benefit patients prone to denture stomatitis. Due to their superior mechanical properties, CAD/CAM PMMA fixed partial dentures (up to 4 units) can be used where long term (up to one year) temporization is needed in certain clinical situations.

6.7. Miscellaneous Applications

In addition to the above discussed applications, PMMA-based materials are frequently used in additional applications in various disciplines of clinical dentistry. In orthodontics, various removeable orthodontic appliances, such as retainers, bite planes, myofunctional appliances, bite guards, and occlusal splints, are fabricated using PMMA. The material characteristics and the fabrication process for orthodontic appliances are similar to PMMA denture bases, as described earlier; the only differences are their design and functional capacities, which depend on the application. In addition, PMMA base adhesives are used to bond orthodontic brackets. In addition, PMMA is conveniently used to make secondary impression trays, modify primary trays, and copy (duplicate) dentures. Due to its cheap cost and ease of manipulation, PMMA is frequently used to embed or fix specimens for restorative dentistry research and for fabrication of study casts for treatment planning. Further modifications and improvements to the properties of PMMA are likely to overcome the major shortcomings of this most commonly used dentistry polymer and are likely to remarkably enhance its applications in various disciplines of clinical dentistry.

7. Modifications of PMMA

Despite there being plenty of research on and understanding of biomaterials, there is a lack of ideal biomaterials for dental applications. Although PMMA certainly has many good properties (such as its strength, easy manipulation, cost-effectiveness) and has gained popularity for several dental applications, as discussed above, there are several shortcomings of this material that fall short of an ideal material’s properties for denture bases or other dental applications. For example, polymerization shrinkage (linear and volumetric) may result in remarkable dimensional changes and inaccuracies during denture fabrication. Similarly, the presence of residual monomers always remains an issue affecting the properties and biocompatibility. Other properties of PMMA that require improvement include its poor fatigue strength, low impact strength, weak bonding strength, low thermal conductivity, susceptibility to crazing, high thermal expansion coefficient, poor color stability, susceptibility to warpage, and porosity. Each drawback has its own consequences, such as the poor flexural and impact strength resulting in fatigue failure or accidental fracture of dentures. Various representative examples of PMMA modification and associated outcomes are shown in Figure 5. Therefore, the improvement of PMMA properties is required and remain a focus for researchers. In recent years, a wide range of modifications of PMMA-based materials (such as reinforcement of fibers or filler particles, antimicrobial modifications) have been investigated to improve their performance, which have been discussed.

7.1. Mechanical Reinforcement Using Fibers

To improve the properties of PMMA materials, a variety of fibers have been added and extensively characterized (Table 6). Several studies have reported the improvement of various properties of fiber-reinforced PMMA. The characteristic reinforcement benefits are obtained due to the greater length of the fibers compared to the cross-sectional diameter. In addition, the enhancement of mechanical properties is affected by fibers’ morphology (length, diameter), orientation in the matrix, concentration, pre-impregnation, and silane treatment. For example, the fibers can be either continuous and long, running through the span of the prosthesis, or can be short. Adding fibers shorter than the critical length (0.5–1.6mm for glass fibers) may negatively affect the mechanical properties. Similarly, the orientation of the fibers is also important in defining their mechanical properties. The unidirectional orientation of fibers results in anisotropy and reinforced strength in one direction, while a multidirectional or woven orientation results in isotropic dispersion of fibers and reinforced strength in all directions.

In addition to the fiber morphology and orientation, the fiber–matrix interface contributes greatly to the mechanical reinforcement. The pre-impregnation of fibers using monomers has been demonstrated to enhance the fibers’ properties by improving their wettability and adhesion within the matrix. In addition, pre-impregnated fibers reduce voids in the matrix and facilitate uniform distribution of stresses. Similarly, treating fibers with silane coupling agents encourages bonding between fibers and the matrix. The silanated fibers demonstrated improved bonding strength compared to the untreated fibers. However, the cost of commercially available fibers and further pre-treatment processing increase the overall cost of denture production.

7.2. Mechanical Reinforcement Using Particles

To reinforce the properties of PMMA materials, a variety of filler particles have been investigated, including ceramics and metals (Table 7). It is obvious from these studies that the addition of particles resulted in no biocompatibility issues and improved various properties of the PMMA, including the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, dimensional stability, and antimicrobial activity, and also reduced the solubility and water sorption. The beneficial outcomes resulting from the use of nanoparticles are achieved due to their characteristic features, such as their high surface area and better distribution.

In addition, the properties of nanoparticles (morphology, loading, type) affect the final properties of reinforced PMMA. For example, The ZrO2 nanotubes demonstrated superior reinforcement of the mechanical properties compared to the ZrO2 particles. Similarly, adding metallic nanoparticles enhances the thermal conductivity of the denture base and allows better judgement of food temperature. In addition, hybrid reinforcement has been carried out using various fibers, particles, and combinations of fibers and particles. Hybrid reinforcement improves the interface and enhance the loading capacity, improving the material’s properties. Hybrid reinforcement using different types of fibers improve various properties of PMMA, including the tensile strength, flexural modulus, surface roughness, radiopacity, and thermal conductivity, and also results in decreased polymerization shrinkage. Although the use of various combinations of hybrid reinforcements resulted in promising outcomes, additional research is required to explore various other materials and combinations to further improve the properties of PMMA materials.

In addition to several fibers and particles (Table 6 and Table 7), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been investigated to reinforce the properties of PMMA. The rationale for using CNTs is their exceptional electrical and mechanical properties, the fact that they are many times stronger than steel, and their low density and resilience. There are two distinct structurally stable types of CNTs: single-walled (single seamlessly wrapped cylindrical tube) and multiwalled (array of concentric nanotubes nested concentrically) CNTs.

Wang et al. added variable concentrations of multiwalled CNTs carbon to PMMA and characterized the various mechanical properties. Although adding CNTs in amounts of up to 1% improved the flexural strength and resilience, increasing the CNT concentration (2%) compromised the properties due to the insufficient dispersion of CNTs. A similar study reported the enhancement of all tested mechanical properties form the addition of 1% of CNTs. Qasim et al. added single-walled NCTs to various light-cured PMMA materials and observed no significant improvements in the flexural properties. In addition to the mechanical properties, CNT loading also reduced the polymerization shrinkage remarkably, which is very beneficial for improving the dimensional accuracy of prostheses, particularly crowns and fixed partial dentures. Although the addition of CNTs resulted in the establishment of good interfaces, the main concern is the bad color, which limits the use of PMMA–CNT materials to non-aesthetic areas.

7.3. Chemical Modification of PMMA

The properties of PMMA materials can be improved through chemical modification. A typical example of chemical modification is the incorporation of rubber to form a PMMA–rubber semi-interpenetrating network, which improves the impact strength. Crack propagation through the PMMA matrix is decelerated when the crack line reaches the rubber interface. Accordingly, the denture can withstand higher impact stresses before fracturing, ultimately improving the fatigue resistance. Due to the elastic nature of rubber, the denture gains more flexibility from having a reduced elastic modulus. Furthermore, the properties of rubber–PMMA materials vary vastly depending on the concentration of rubber (styrene–butadiene copolymer) added to the PMMA. One study showed that the Young’s modulus and tensile strength values were reduced by increasing the rubber content. Considering its high impact strength and fracture resistance, rubber-incorporated PMMA can be beneficial for patients who are prone to dropping their prosthesis repeatedly, such as senile and Parkinson’s disease patients. The drawback of these materials is their high cost. Currently, very little research is available regarding the chemical modification of PMMA. Therefore, further research exploring chemical modifications of PMMA using various materials is required, including cross-linkers, resins, and copolymers.

7.4. Antimicrobial Functionalization of PMMA

Biofilm formation and bacterial growth are always concerning due to the associated infectious diseases and financial burden on the healthcare system. In the oral cavity, bacterial adhesion and plaque is associated with various prevalent conditions, including dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal diseases, and denture-induced stomatitis resulting in fungal growth. Therefore, the development and functionalization of biomaterials with antimicrobial properties is always desired. To impart antimicrobial properties on the materials, various modifications have been reported, such as the addition of antimicrobial polymers, inorganic nanoparticles, or medicaments, as well as surface functionalization, demonstrating promising outcomes against various oral microorganisms. Several studies have reported the inhibition of microbial adhesion and growth on PMMA surfaces containing fluoride glass fillers, fluorapatite, or apatite-coated TiO2. The availability of fluoride in the oral cavity results in the enhancement of antibacterial activity against the oral microbiomes. Similarly, the growth of denture-stomatitis-associated Candida albicans was remarkably inhibited by the addition of silver nanoparticles, nanodiamonds, and mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with the antifungal medicament amphotericin B. The addition of thymoquinone antifungal agent (up to 1%) to the PMMA had no effect on the surface and flexural properties. Quaternary ammonium compounds are also known for their antibacterial activity and have been reviewed comprehensively for the modification of various dental materials. Although quaternary ammonium-based compounds showed good antimicrobial activity when added to restorative dental materials, they may affect the properties of other materials, such as the polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength, modulus, and biocompatibility, if used in higher concentrations. Adding quaternary ammonium compounds (2%) to cured PMMA resulted in antibacterial and antifungal activity in vitro. Dentures containing quaternary ammonium compounds may benefit geriatric patients prone to developing denture stomatitis.

Surface functionalization is another approach that can produce antimicrobial properties and inhibition of the bacterial adhesion on a material’s surface. The surface functionalization engineers the material’s surface, therefore making it less likely to affect the bulk properties. Recently, Mai et al. reported on the surface functionalization of PMMA using oxygen plasma and thermal treatment. Chlorhexidine was incorporated to induce the antimicrobial activity via controlled and sustained drug release from the functionalized surface. In addition, no cellular toxicity or apoptotic cell death was observed during the cytotoxicity evaluation. Lee et al. incorporated graphene oxide nanosheets into PMMA and characterized for their physical and antimicrobial properties. The addition of graphene oxide nanosheets and non-thermal oxygen plasma surface treatment improved the hydrophilicity and surface antiadhesive effects. Recently, various food preservatives (such as sodium metabisulfite, potassium sorbate) have been added to PMMA. The modified PMMA materials demonstrated acceptable flexural properties and enhanced antimicrobial activity without showing any cytotoxicity. Although the addition of the food preservatives altered the mechanical properties, the materials still provided acceptable flexural properties.

Although the addition of antimicrobial nanoparticles has not resulted in biocompatibility issues, the majority of research has been conducted in vitro. A material’s responses, including its antimicrobial activity, may be different when in a complex dynamic oral environment. Various antimicrobial additives may lead to cytotoxicity. Therefore, further in vivo clinical studies are essential to validate the efficacy of the antimicrobial agents and establish their biosafety and biocompatibility.

8. Conclusions and Future Trends

The present article comprehensively reviewed the properties, dental applications, and recent modifications of PMMA-based materials. According to ADA Specification No. 12, the majority of PMMA properties satisfactorily fulfil the requirements for denture base polymers. Nevertheless, the discoloration, hydrolytic degradation, and fracture of PMMA appliances are commonly reported in dental clinics, indicating that the properties of PMMA require further improvement. In the recent decades, plentiful research has been conducted, focusing om further improving the physical and mechanical properties of PMMA. Modifications of PMMA involving chemical or mechanical reinforcement using supplementary materials (fibers, nanofillers, nanotubes and hybrid materials) have resulted in remarkable improvements in the mechanical (impact strength, cyclic fatigue, flexural strength, and wear resistance), physical (thermal conductivity, water sorption, solubility, and dimensional stability), and biological (antimicrobial activity, biocompatibility) properties (Section 7). However, it remains challenging to improve one set of properties without compromising the rest of the properties. For example, although adding nanoparticles or fibers can improve the strength of PMMA, this may compromise the aesthetics (color, translucency) or increase the biocompatibility issues via the leaching of degradation products in the oral cavity. Although the current modifications of PMMA have resulted in encouraging outcomes, there is a long way to in using modified PMMA materials in dental clinics for practical applications. The biocompatibility and in vivo performance of modified materials are still questionable and require further investigation. Further research should focus on understanding the interactions of modified materials at the molecular levels, the evaluation of various properties following ADA specifications, and clinical performance in either simulated oral environments or in vivo clinical studies.

References 299

  1. 1.

    Rokaya D., Srimaneepong V., Sapkota J., Qin J., Siraleartmukul K., Siriwongrungson V. Polymeric materials and films in dentistry: An overview. J. Adv. Res. 2018;14:25-34.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.001

  2. 2.

    Xu X., He L., Zhu B., Li J., Li J. Advances in polymeric materials for dental applications. Polym. Chem. 2017;8:807-823.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6py01957a

  3. 3.

    Imazato S., Ma S., Chen J., Xu H.H.K. Therapeutic polymers for dental adhesives: Loading resins with bio-active components. Dent. Mater. 2014;30:97-104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2013.06.003

  4. 4.

    Najeeb S., Zafar M.S., Khurshid Z., Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016;60:12-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001

  5. 5.

    Kwon J., Kim Y.H., Choi E.H., Kim K. Development of ultra-hydrophilic and non-cytotoxic dental vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using a non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasma jet. J. Phys. D. 2013;46:195201.

    Not in our library10.1088/0022-3727/46/19/195201

  6. 6.

    Ohkawa K., Hayashi S., Kameyama N., Yamamoto H., Yamaguchi M., Kimoto S., Kurata S., Shinji H. Synthesis of collagen-like sequential polypeptides containing O-phospho-L-hydroxyproline and preparation of electrospun composite fibers for possible dental application. Macromol. Biosci. 2009;9:79-92.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200800122

  7. 7.

    Deb S. Polymers in dentistry. J. Eng. Med. 1998;212:453-464.

    Not in our library10.1243/0954411981534213

  8. 8.
    Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses · 2021
    No notice
  9. 9.

    Hassan M., Asghar M., Din S.U., Zafar M.S. Chapter 8. Thermoset Polymethacrylate-Based Materials for Dental Applications. 2019;273-308.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Nejatian T., Pezeshki S., Yaqin Syed A.U., Khurshid Z., Najeeb S., Zafar M.S., Sefat F. Acrylic denture base materials. 5 Advanced Dental Biomaterials. 2019;79-104.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Sakaguchi R.L., Powers J.M. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 2012.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Nano-mechanical evaluation of dental hard tissues using indentation technique. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013;28:1393-1399.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Chang M., Hung C., Chen W., Tseng S., Chen Y., Wang J. Effects of pontic span and fiber reinforcement on fracture strength of multi-unit provisional fixed partial dentures. J. Dent. Sci. 2019;14:309-317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.008

  14. 14.

    Al-Thobity A.M. The impact of polymerization technique and glass-fiber reinforcement on the flexural properties of denture base resin material. Eur. J. Dent. 2020;14:92-99.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0040-1701922

  15. 15.

    Moreno-Maldonado V., Acosta-Torres L., Barceló-Santana F., Vanegas-Lancón R., Plata-Rodríguez M., Castano V. Fiber-reinforced nanopigmented poly (methyl methacrylate) as improved denture base. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012;126:289-296.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.36913

  16. 16.

    Hamouda I.M., Beyari M.M. Addition of glass fibers and titanium dioxide nanoparticles to the acrylic resin denture base material: Comparative study with the conventional and high impact types. Oral Health Dent. Manag. 2014;13:107-112.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Ismaeel I.J., Alalwan H.K., Mustafa M. The effect of the addition of silanated poly propylene fiber to polymethylmethacrylate denture base material on some of its mechanical properties. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;27:40-47.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015263

  18. 18.

    Chen S., Liang W., Yen P. Reinforcement of acrylic denture base resin by incorporation of various fibers. J. Biomed. Mater. 2001;58:203-208.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:2<203::aid-jbm1008>3.0.co;2-g

  19. 19.

    Vallittu P.K., Lassila V.P., Lappalainen R. Acrylic resin-fiber composite—Part I: The effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994;71:607-612.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(94)90446-4

  20. 20.

    Manley T.R., Bowman A.J., Cook M. Denture bases reinforced with carbon fibres. Br. Dent. J. 1979;146:25.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bdj.4804188

  21. 21.

    Yu S., Lee Y., Oh S., Cho H., Oda Y., Bae J. Reinforcing effects of different fibers on denture base resin based on the fiber type, concentration, and combination. Dent. Mater. J. 2012;31:1039-1046.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2012-020

  22. 22.

    Ladizesky N., Cheng Y., Chow T., Ward I. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber-properties and denture construction. Dent. Mater. 1993;9:128-135.

    Not in our library10.1016/0109-5641(93)90089-9

  23. 23.

    Ghafari T., Hamedi R.F., Ezzati B. Does addition of silver nanoparticles to denture base resin increase its thermal conductivity? J. Dent. Sch. 2014;32:144.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Hamedi-Rad F., Ghaffari T., Rezaii F., Ramazani A. Effect of nanosilver on thermal and mechanical properties of acrylic base complete dentures. J. Dent. (Tehran). 2014;11:495-505.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Jasim B.S., Ismail I.J. The effect of silanized alumina nano-fillers addition on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2014;26:18-23.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015190

  26. 26.

    Chaijareenont P., Takahashi H., Nishiyama N., Arksornnukit M. Effect of different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane on the flexural properties and wear resistance of alumina reinforced PMMA. Dent. Mater. J. 2012;31:623-628.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2012-056

  27. 27.
    Simulated body fluid and water absorption effects on poly(methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite denture base composites · 2010
    Not checked
  28. 28.

    Aldabib J.M., Ishak Z.A.M. Effect of hydroxyapatite filler concentration on mechanical properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base. SN Appl. Sci. 2020;2:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1007/s42452-020-2546-1

  29. 29.

    De Souza Leão R., de Moraes S.L.D., de Luna Gomes J.M., Lemos C.A.A., da Silva Casado B.G., do Egito Vasconcelos B.C., Pellizzer E.P. Influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA: A systematic review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2020;106:110292.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2019.110292

  30. 30.

    Zidan S., Silikas N., Haider J., Alhotan A., Jahantigh J., Yates J. Evaluation of equivalent flexural strength for complete removable dentures made of zirconia-impregnated PMMA nanocomposites. Materials. 2020;13:2580.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma13112580

  31. 31.

    Gad M.M., Rahoma A., Al-Thobity A.M., ArRejaie A.S. Influence of incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the repair strength of polymethyl methacrylate denture bases. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016;11:5633-5643.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s120054

  32. 32.

    Salih S.I., Oleiwi J.K., Hamad Q.A. Investigation of fatigue and compression strength for the PMMA reinforced by different system for denture applications. Int. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015;3:5-13.

    Not in our library10.11648/j.ijbmr.20150301.13

  33. 33.

    Gad M.M.A., Abualsaud R., Al-Thobity A.M., Almaskin D.F., AlZaher Z.A., Abushowmi T.H., Qaw M.S., Akhtar S., Al-Harbi F.A. Effect of SiO2 nanoparticles addition on the flexural strength of repaired acrylic denture base. Eur. J. Dent. 2020;14:019-023.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0039-1701076

  34. 34.

    Safi I.N. Evaluation the effect of nano-fillers (TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2) addition on glass transition temperature, E-Moudulus and coefficient of thermal expansion of acrylic denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2014;26:37-41.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015162

  35. 35.

    Balos S., Puskar T., Potran M., Milekic B., Djurovic Koprivica D., Laban Terzija J., Gusic I. Modulus, strength and cytotoxicity of PMMA-silica nanocomposites. Coatings. 2020;10:583.

    Not in our library10.3390/coatings10060583

  36. 36.

    Balos S., Pilic B., Markovic D., Pavlicevic J., Luzanin O. Poly (methyl-methacrylate) nanocomposites with low silica addition. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014;111:327-334.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.021

  37. 37.

    Alamgir M., Mallick A., Nayak G., Tiwari S.K. Development of PMMA/TiO2 nanocomposites as excellent dental materials. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019;33:4755-4760.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12206-019-0916-7

  38. 38.

    Wang R., Tao J., Yu B., Dai L. Characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014;111:318-326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.017

  39. 39.

    Qasim S.B., Al Kheraif A.A., Ramakrishaniah R. An investigation into the impact and flexural strength of light cure denture resin reinforced with carbon nanotubes. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012;18:808-812.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Mahmood W.S. The effect of incorporating carbon nanotubes on impact, transverse strength, hardness, and roughness to high impact denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;27:96-99.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015271

  41. 41.

    Turagam N., Prasad Mudrakola D. Effect of micro-additions of carbon nanotubes to polymethylmethacrylate on reduction in polymerization shrinkage. J. Prosthodont. Implant. Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 2013;22:105-111.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00917.x

  42. 42.

    Wang R., Kayacan R., Küçükeşmen C. Nanotubes/polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. Carbon Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. 2016;227-240.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Andreopoulos A., Papanicolaou G. Rubber-modified polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1987;22:3417-3420.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01161214

  44. 44.

    Redtenbacher J. Ueber die zerlegungsprodukte des glyceryloxydes durch trockene destillation. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1843;47:113-148.

    Not in our library10.1002/jlac.18430470202

  45. 45.

    Rueggeberg F.A. From vulcanite to vinyl, a history of resins in restorative dentistry. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2002;87:364-379.

    Not in our library10.1067/mpr.2002.123400

  46. 46.

    Neher H.T. Acrylic resins. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936;28:267-271.

    Not in our library10.1021/ie50315a002

  47. 47.

    Peyton F.A. History of resins in dentistry. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1975;19:211-222.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    DiMaio F.R. The science of bone cement: A historical review. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1399-1407.

    Not in our library10.3928/0147-7447-20021201-21

  49. 49.

    Kraft J. Polymethylmethacrylate—A review. J. Foot Surg. 1977;16:66-68.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Frazer R.Q., Byron R.T., Osborne P.B., West K.P. PMMA: An essential material in medicine and dentistry. J. Long. Term. Eff. Med. 2005;15:629-639.

    Not in our library10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i6.60

  51. 51.

    Zidan S., Silikas N., Alhotan A., Haider J., Yates J. Investigating the mechanical properties of ZrO2-impregnated PMMA nanocomposite for denture-based applications. Materials. 2019;12:1344.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12081344

  52. 52.
    TiO<sub>2</sub> and PEEK Reinforced 3D Printing PMMA Composite Resin for Dental Denture Base Applications · 2019
    Not checked
  53. 53.

    Shakeri F., Nodehi A., Atai M. PMMA/double-modified organoclay nanocomposites as fillers for denture base materials with improved mechanical properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019;90:11-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.033

  54. 54.

    Najeeb S., Khurshid Z., Agwan A.S., Zafar M.S., Alrahabi M., Qasim S.B., Sefat F. Dental applications of nanodiamonds. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2016;8:2064-2070.

    Not in our library10.1166/sam.2016.2993

  55. 55.

    Johnson W.W. The history of prosthetic dentistry. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1959;9:841-846.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(59)90049-6

  56. 56.

    Gautam R., Singh R.D., Sharma V.P., Siddhartha R., Chand P., Kumar R. Biocompatibility of polymethylmethacrylate resins used in dentistry. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B. 2012;100:1444-1450.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.32673

  57. 57.

    Khindria S., Mittal S., Sukhija U. Evolution of denture base materials. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2009;9:64.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Kedjarune U., Charoenworaluk N., Koontongkaew S. Release of methyl methacrylate from heat-curved and autopolymerized resins: Cytotoxicity testing related to residual monomer. Aust. Dent. J. 1999;44:25-30.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1834-7819.1999.tb00532.x

  59. 59.

    Lang B.R. The use of gold in construction of mandibular denture bases. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1974;32:398-404.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(74)90348-5

  60. 60.

    Murray M.D., Darvell B.W. The evolution of the complete denture base. Theories of complete denture retention—A review. Part 1. Aust. Dent. J. 1993;38:216-219.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb03067.x

  61. 61.

    Komal L., Mahesh V. 19th century denture base materials revisited. Off. Publ. Am. Acad. Hist. Dent. 2011;59:1-11.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Young B.C. A Comparison of Polymeric Denture Base Materials. Ph.D. Thesis. 2010.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Sasaki H., Hamanaka I., Takahashi Y., Kawaguchi T. Effect of long-term water immersion or thermal shock on mechanical properties of high-impact acrylic denture base resins. Dent. Mater. J. 2016;35:204-209.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2015-291

  64. 64.

    Takahashi Y., Hamanaka I., Shimizu H. Flexural properties of denture base resins subjected to long-term water immersion. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2013;71:716-720.

    Not in our library10.3109/00016357.2012.715196

  65. 65.

    Narva K.K., Lassila L.V., Vallittu P.K. The static strength and modulus of fiber reinforced denture base polymer. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:421-428.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.007

  66. 66.

    Nejatian T., Nathwani N., Taylor L., Sefat F. Denture base composites: Effect of surface modified nano-and micro-particulates on mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate. Materials. 2020;13:307.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma13020307

  67. 67.

    Gad M.M., Abualsaud R., Al-Thobity A.M., Baba N.Z., Al-Harbi F.A. Influence of addition of different nanoparticles on the surface properties of poly (methylmethacrylate) denture base material. J. Prosthodont. 2020;29:422-428.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.13168

  68. 68.

    Gad M.M., Rahoma A., Abulsaud R., Al-Thobity A.M., Akhtar S., Helal M.A., AL-Harbi F.A. Impact of different surface treatments and repair material reinforcement on the flexural strength of repaired PMMA denture base material. Dent. Mater. J. 2020;2018-2436.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2018-436

  69. 69.

    Al-Harbi F.A., Abdel-Halim M.S., Gad M.M., Fouda S.M., Baba N.Z., AlRumaih H.S., Akhtar S. Effect of nanodiamond addition on flexural strength, impact strength, and surface roughness of PMMA denture base. J. Prosthodont. 2019;28:e417-e425.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12969

  70. 70.

    Elshereksi N., Muchtar A., Azhari C. Effects of nanobarium titanate on physical and mechanical properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base nanocomposites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1177/0967391120926442

  71. 71.

    Raszewski Z., Nowakowska-Toporowska A., Weżgowiec J., Nowakowska D., Więckiewicz W. Influence of silanized silica and silanized feldspar addition on the mechanical behavior of polymethyl methacrylate resin denture teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;123:647.e1-647.e7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.007

  72. 72.

    Abushowmi T.H., AlZaher Z.A., Almaskin D.F., Qaw M.S., Abualsaud R., Akhtar S., Al-Thobity A.M., Al-Harbi F.A., Gad M.M., Baba N.Z. Comparative effect of glass fiber and nano-filler addition on denture repair strength. J. Prosthodont. 2020;29:261-268.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.13124

  73. 73.

    Alqahtani M. Effect of hexagonal boron nitride nanopowder reinforcement and mixing methods on physical and mechanical properties of self-cured PMMA for dental applications. Materials. 2020;13:2323.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma13102323

  74. 74.

    Helal M.A., Yang B., Saad E., Abas M., Al-kholy M.R., Imam A.Y., Gad M.M. Effect of SiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles on wear resistance of PMMA acrylic denture teeth. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2020;23:12.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Jagger D., Harrison A., Jandt K. The reinforcement of dentures. J. Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:185-194.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00375.x

  76. 76.

    Alhareb A., Akil H., Ahmad Z. Mechanical properties of PMMA denture base reinforced by nitrile rubber particles with Al2O3/YSZ fillers. Procedia Manuf. 2015;2:301-306.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.053

  77. 77.

    Ali U., Karim K.J.B.A., Buang N.A. A Review of the properties and applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym. Rev. 2015;55:678-705.

    Not in our library10.1080/15583724.2015.1031377

  78. 78.

    Anusavice K.J., Shen C., Rawls H.R. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 2012.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Swaney A.C., Paffenbarger G.C., Caul H.J., Sweeney W. American dental association specification No. 12 for denture base resin: Second revision. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1953;46:54-66.

    Not in our library10.14219/jada.archive.1953.0007

  80. 80.

    Council on dental materials and devices. Revised american dental association specification no. 12 for denture base polymers. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1975;90:451-458.

    Not in our library10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0069

  81. 81.

    ISO. ISO 20795–1:2013 Dentistry-Base Polymers-Part 1: Denture Base Polymers.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Alla R., Raghavendra K., Vyas R., Konakanchi A. Conventional and contemporary polymers for the fabrication of denture prosthesis: Part I–overview, composition and properties. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2015;1:82.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    Harrison A., Huggett R. Effect of the curing cycle on residual monomer levels of acrylic resin denture base polymers. J. Dent. 1992;20:370-374.

    Not in our library10.1016/0300-5712(92)90031-7

  84. 84.

    Bartoloni J., Murchison D., Wofford D., Sarkar N. Degree of conversion in denture base materials for varied polymerization techniques 1. J. Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:488-493.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00536.x

  85. 85.

    Jerolimov V., Brooks S., Huggett R., Bates J. Rapid curing of acrylic denture-base materials. Dent. Mater. 1989;5:18-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/0109-5641(89)90086-9

  86. 86.

    Memon M.S., Yunus N., Razak A.A.A., Memon M., Yunus N., Razak A. Some mechanical properties of a highly cross-linked, microwave-polymerized, injection-molded denture base polymer. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2001;14:214-218.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    Tandon R., Gupta S., Agarwal S.K. Denture base materials: From past to future. Indian J. Dent. Sci. 2010;2:33-39.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    McCabe J.F., Walls A. Applied Dental Materials. 2013.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:3-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014

  90. 90.

    Alqahtani M. Mechanical properties enhancement of self-cured PMMA reinforced with zirconia and boron nitride nanopowders for high-performance dental materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020;110:103937.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103937

  91. 91.

    Shintani H., Inoue T., Yamaki M. Analysis of camphorquinone in visible light-cured composite resins. Dent. Mater. 1985;1:124-126.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0109-5641(85)80002-6

  92. 92.

    Park Y.J., Chae K.H., Rawls H.R. Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. Dent. Mater. 1999;15:120-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00021-4

  93. 93.

    Ogle R.E., Sorensen S.E., Lewis E.A. A new visible light-cured resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1986;56:497-506.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(86)90397-5

  94. 94.

    Takamata T., Setcos J.C. Resin denture bases: Review of accuracy and methods of polymerization. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1989;2:555-562.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Skinner E.W. Acrylic denture base materials: Their physical properties and manipulation. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1951;1:161-167.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(51)90091-1

  96. 96.

    Nogueira S.S., Ogle R.E., Davis E.L. Comparison of accuracy between compression-and injection-molded complete dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999;82:291-300.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70083-1

  97. 97.

    Gharechahi J., Asadzadeh N., Shahabian F., Gharechahi M. Dimensional changes of acrylic resin denture bases: Conventional versus injection-molding technique. J. Dent. (Tehran). 2014;11:398-405.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Nanoindentation and surface roughness profilometry of poly methyl methacrylate denture base materials. Technol. Health Care. 2014;22:573-581.

    Not in our library10.3233/thc-140832

  99. 99.

    Vallittu P.K., Miettinen V., Alakuijala P. Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent. Mater. 1995;11:338-342.

    Not in our library10.1016/0109-5641(95)80031-x

  100. 100.

    Elwakiel N., El-Sayed Y., Elkafrawy H. Synthesis, Characterization of Ag and Sn2 complexes and their applications to improve the biological and mechanical properties of denture base materials. J. Mol. Struct. 2020;1219:128521.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128521

  101. 101.

    Raszewski Z. Influence of polymerization method on the cytotoxicity of three different denture base acrylic resins polymerized in different methods. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020;27:2612-2616.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.039

  102. 102.

    Zheng J., Su Q., Wang C., Cheng G., Zhu R., Shi J., Yao K. Synthesis and biological evaluation of PMMA/MMT nanocomposite as denture base material. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011;22:1063-1071.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-011-4269-8

  103. 103.

    Soygun K., Bolayir G., Boztug A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2013;5:153-160.

    Not in our library10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153

  104. 104.

    Asar N.V., Albayrak H., Korkmaz T., Turkyilmaz I. Influence of various metal oxides on mechanical and physical properties of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2013;5:241-247.

    Not in our library10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.241

  105. 105.

    Polychronakis N., Dimitriadi M., Ioannidis A., Papadopoulos T. The effect of different cooling procedures on mechanical properties of denture base materials measured by instrumented indentation testing. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2020;64:326-331.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.005

  106. 106.

    Rickman L.J., Padipatvuthikul P., Satterthwaite J.D. Contemporary denture base resins: Part 1. Dent. Update. 2012;39:25-30.

    Not in our library10.12968/denu.2012.39.1.25

  107. 107.

    Mark J.E. Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook, 1076. 2007;3-8.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    Kutz M. Handbook of Materials Selection. 2002;341.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    Braun K.N., Mello J.N., Rached R., Del Bel Cury A. Surface texture and some properties of acrylic resins submitted to chemical polishing. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:91-98.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00997.x

  110. 110.

    Jorge J.H., Giampaolo E.T., Machado A.L., Vergani C.E. Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: A literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90:190-193.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00349-4

  111. 111.

    Lung C., Darvell B. Minimization of the inevitable residual monomer in denture base acrylic. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:1119-1128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.003

  112. 112.

    Thaitammayanon C., Sirichompun C., Wiwatwarrapan C. Ultrasonic treatment reduced residual monomer in methyl methacrylate-based orthodontic base-plate materials. Dent. Oral. Craniofac. Res. 2018;4:1-5.

    Not in our library10.15761/docr.1000251

  113. 113.

    Vallittu P.K., Ruyter I.E., Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1998;106:588-593.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106109.x

  114. 114.

    Doǧan A., Bek B., Cevik N., Usanmaz A. The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water absorption. J. Dent. 1995;23:313-318.

    Not in our library10.1016/0300-5712(94)00002-w

  115. 115.

    Leggat P.A., Kedjarune U. Toxicity of methyl methacrylate in dentistry. Int. Dent. J. 2003;53:126-131.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1875-595x.2003.tb00736.x

  116. 116.

    Latief A. Sorption and Solubility of a Denture Base Acrylic. Master’s Thesis. 2012.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    Miettinen V.M., Vallittu P.K. Water sorption and solubility of glass fiber-reinforced denture polymethyl methacrylate resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997;77:531-534.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70147-1

  118. 118.

    Bayraktar G., Guvener B., Bural C., Uresin Y. Influence of polymerization method, curing process, and length of time of storage in water on the residual methyl methacrylate content in dental acrylic resins. J. Biomed. Mater. 2006;76:340-345.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.30377

  119. 119.

    Tuna S.H., Keyf F., Gumus H.O., Uzun C. The evaluation of water sorption/solubility on various acrylic resins. Eur. J. Dent. 2008;2:191-197.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0039-1697377

  120. 120.
    Comparative study of sorption and solubility of heat-cure and self-cure acrylic resins in different solutions · 2016
    Not checked
  121. 121.

    Van Noort R., Barbour M.E. Introduction to Dental Materials 4. 2013.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Sagsoz N.P., Yanıkoglu N., Ulu H., Bayındır F. Color changes of polyamid and polymetyhl methacrylate denture base materials. Open J. Stomatol. 2014;4:489-496.

    Not in our library10.4236/ojst.2014.410066

  123. 123.

    Alp G., Johnston W.M., Yilmaz B. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019;121:347-352.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.001

  124. 124.

    Scotti R., Mascellani S.C., Forniti F. The in vitro color stability of acrylic resins for provisional restorations. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1997;10:164-168.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Ganzarolli S.M., Nunes de Mello J.A., Shinkai R.S., Del Bel Cury A. A Internal adaptation and some physical properties of methacrylate-based denture base resins polymerized by different techniques. J. Biomed. Mater. 2007;82:169-173.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.30718

  126. 126.

    Safarabadi M., Khansari N., Rezaei A. An experimental investigation of HA/AL2O3 nanoparticles on mechanical properties of restoration materials. Eng. Solid Mech. 2014;2:173-182.

    Not in our library10.5267/j.esm.2014.4.006

  127. 127.

    Chandler H., Bowen R., Paffenbarger G. Development of a radiopaque denture base material. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1971;5:253-265.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.820050312

  128. 128.

    McCabe J., Wilson H. A radio-opaque denture material. J. Dent. 1976;4:211-217.

    Not in our library10.1016/0300-5712(76)90050-6

  129. 129.

    Aldabib J. Reinforcement of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base material. Dent. Med. J. 2020;2:46-53.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    Lang L.A., Mattie P.A., Rawis H.R. The effect of triphenylbismuth on the radiopacity and performance properties of compression-and injection-molded denture resins. J. Prosthodont. 2000;9:23-29.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2000.00023.x

  131. 131.

    Alhareb A., Akil H., Ahmad Z. Influence of Al2O3/Y-TSZ mixture as filler loading on the radiopacity of PMMA denture base composites. Procedia Chem. 2016;19:646-650.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.065

  132. 132.

    Mattie P.A., Rawls H.R., Cabasso I. Development of a radiopaque, autopolymerizing dental acrylic resin. J. Prosthodont. 1994;3:213-218.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.1994.tb00158.x

  133. 133.

    Bloodworth K.E., Render P.J. Dental acrylic resin radiopacity: Literature review and survey of practitioners’ attitudes. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1992;67:121-123.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(92)90061-e

  134. 134.

    Bangera M.K., Kotian R., Ravishankar N. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticle reinforcement on flexural strength of denture base resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2020;56:68-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.01.001

  135. 135.

    AlQahtani M., Haralur S.B. Influence of different repair acrylic resin and thermocycling on the flexural strength of denture base resin. Medicina. 2020;56:50.

    Not in our library10.3390/medicina56020050

  136. 136.

    Kawaguchi T., Lassila L.V., Baba H., Tashiro S., Hamanaka I., Takahashi Y., Vallittu P.K. Effect of cellulose nanofiber content on flexural properties of a model, thermoplastic, injection-molded, polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020;102:103513.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103513

  137. 137.

    Hannon S.A., Hussain W.A., Hussain S.M. Studying the impact strength of layered denture base resin. Iraqi J. Phys. 2020;18:25-32.

    Not in our library10.30723/ijp.v18i44.495

  138. 138.

    Vallittu P.K., Vojtkova H., Lassila V.P. Impact strength of denture polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wire. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1995;53:392-396.

    Not in our library10.3109/00016359509006007

  139. 139.

    Mowade T.K., Dange S.P., Thakre M.B., Kamble V.D. Effect of fiber reinforcement on impact strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin: In vitro study and SEM analysis. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2012;4:30-36.

    Not in our library10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.30

  140. 140.

    Faot F., Costa M.A., Cury A.A.D.B., Garcia R.C.R. Impact strength and fracture morphology of denture acrylic resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006;96:367-373.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.001

  141. 141.

    Abdulrazzaq Naji S., Behroozibakhsh M., Jafarzadeh Kashi T.S., Eslami H., Masaeli R., Mahgoli H., Tahriri M., Ghavvami Lahiji M., Rakhshan V. Effects of incorporation of 2.5 and 5 wt% TiO2 nanotubes on fracture toughness, flexural strength, and microhardness of denture base poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA). J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2018;10:113-121.

    Not in our library10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.113

  142. 142.

    Abdel-Karim U.M., Kenawy E.S. Synthesis of zirconia, organic and hybrid nanofibers for reinforcement of polymethyl methacrylate denture base: Evaluation of flexural strength and modulus, fracture toughness and impact strength. Tanta Dent. J. 2019;16:12-20.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    Mousavi A., Aliha M., Imani D. Effects of biocompatible nanofillers on mixed-mode I and II fracture toughness of PMMA base dentures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020;103:103566.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103566

  144. 144.

    Ali I.L., Yunus N., Abu-Hassan M.I. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems. J. Prosthodont. 2008;17:545-549.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2008.00357.x

  145. 145.

    Vojdani M., Bagheri R., Khaledi A.A.R. Effects of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength, surface hardness, and roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J. Dent. Sci. 2012;7:238-244.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.008

  146. 146.

    Barbosa D.B., Souza R.F. d., Pero A.C., Marra J., Compagnoni M.A. Flexural strength of acrylic resins polymerized by different cycles. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2007;15:424-428.

    Not in our library10.1590/s1678-77572007000500010

  147. 147.

    Zappini G., Kammann A., Wachter W. Comparison of fracture tests of denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90:578-585.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.008

  148. 148.

    Stafford G., Huggett R., Causton B. Fracture toughness of denture base acrylics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1980;14:359-371.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.820140403

  149. 149.

    Robinson J., McCabe J. Impact strength of acrylic resin denture base materials with surface defects. Dent. Mater. 1993;9:355-360.

    Not in our library10.1016/0109-5641(93)90056-v

  150. 150.

    Zafar M.S. Wear behavior of various dental restorative materials. Mater. Technol. 2018;33:25-31.

    Not in our library10.1080/10667857.2018.1462978

  151. 151.

    Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Effects of wear on hardness and stiffness of restorative dental materials. Life Sci. J. 2014;11:11-18.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    Zafar M.S., Amin F., Fareed M.A., Ghabbani H., Riaz S., Khurshid Z., Kumar N. Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics. 2020;5:34.

    Not in our library10.3390/biomimetics5030034

  153. 153.

    Gupta A., Kamra M. An evaluation of the effect of water sorption on dimensional stability of the acrylic resin denture bases. Int. J. Contemp. Dent. 2011;2.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Arima T., Murata H., Hamad T. The effects of cross-linking agents on the water sorption and solubility characteristics of denture base resin. J. Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:476-480.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00882.x

  155. 155.

    Dental Materials and their Selection. 2002;418.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Atwood D.A. Bone loss of edentulous alveolar ridges. J. Periodontol. 1979;50:11-21.

    Not in our library10.1902/jop.1979.50.4s.11

  157. 157.

    Alsaggaf A., Fenlon M.R. A case control study to investigate the effects of denture wear on residual alveolar ridge resorption in edentulous patients. J. Dent. 2020;103373.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103373

  158. 158.

    Atsu S., KeskIn Y. Effect of silica coating and silane surface treatment on the bond strength of soft denture liner to denture base material. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2013;21:300-306.

    Not in our library10.1590/1678-775720130066

  159. 159.

    Nowakowska-Toporowska A., Raszewski Z., Wieckiewicz W. Color change of soft silicone relining materials after storage in artificial saliva. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016;115:377-380.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.022

  160. 160.

    Cavalcanti Y.W., Bertolini M.M., Cury A.A.D.B., da Silva W.J. The effect of poly (methyl methacrylate) surface treatments on the adhesion of silicone-based resilient denture liners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014;112:1539-1544.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.031

  161. 161.

    Bail M., Jorge J.H., Urban V.M., Campanha N.H. Surface roughness of acrylic and silicone-based soft liners: In vivo study in a rat model. J. Prosthodont. 2014;23:146-151.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12074

  162. 162.

    Habib S.R., Vohra F.A. Replacing existing dentures by copy-denture technique for geriatric patients: A case report. J. Pak. Dent. Assoc. 2013;22:265-270.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    Patil S., Naveen B., Patil N. Bonding acrylic teeth to acrylic resin denture bases: A review. Gerodontology. 2006;23:131-139.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00129.x

  164. 164.

    Huggett R., John G., Jagger R.G., Bates J.F. Strength of the acrylic denture base tooth bond. Br. Dent. J. 1982;153:187-190.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bdj.4804883

  165. 165.

    Darbar U., Huggett R., Harrison A. Denture fracture—A survey. Br. Dent. J. 1994;176:342-345.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bdj.4808449

  166. 166.

    Chung K., Chung C., Chung C., Chan D. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J. Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:268-275.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01779.x

  167. 167.

    Saavedra G., Valandro L.F., Leite F.P.P., Amaral R., Özcan M., Bottino M.A., Kimpara E.T. Bond strength of acrylic teeth to denture base resin after various surface conditioning methods before and after thermocycling. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2007;20:199-201.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    Goldin E.B., Boyd III N.W., Goldstein G.R., Hittelman E.L., Thompson V.P. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005;93:143-147.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.023

  169. 169.

    Alabdulkader M.A., Habib S.R. Effect of cement application techniques on the adaptation and retention of provisional crowns. Technol. Health Care. 2018;26:945-955.

    Not in our library10.3233/thc-181351

  170. 170.

    Alt V., Hannig M., Wöstmann B., Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:339-347.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012

  171. 171.

    Yilmaz A., Baydas S. Fracture resistance of various temporary crown materials. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2007;8:44-51.

    Not in our library10.5005/jcdp-8-1-44

  172. 172.
    Thermal irritation of teeth during dental treatment procedures · 2013
    Not checked
  173. 173.

    Bahrani F., Safari A., Vojdani M., Karampoor G., Patil S. Comparison of hardness and surface roughness of two denture bases polymerized by different methods. World J. Dent. 2012;3:171-175.

    Not in our library10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1151

  174. 174.

    Haas S., Brauer G., Dickson G. A characterization of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1975;57:380-391.

    Not in our library10.2106/00004623-197557030-00017

  175. 175.

    Alkurt M., Duymuş Z.Y., Gundogdu M. Effect of repair resin type and surface treatment on the repair strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014;111:71-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.007

  176. 176.

    Raszewski Z., Nowakowska D. Mechanical properties of hot curing acrylic resin after reinforced with different kinds of fibers. Int. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 2013;1:9-13.

    Not in our library10.11648/j.ijbmr.20130101.12

  177. 177.

    Polyzois G.L., Andreopoulos A.G., Lagouvardos P.E. Acrylic resin denture repair with adhesive resin and metal wires: Effects on strength parameters. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996;75:381-387.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90029-3

  178. 178.

    Polyzois G.L., Tarantili P.A., Frangou M.J., Andreopoulos A.G. Fracture force, deflection at fracture, and toughness of repaired denture resin subjected to microwave polymerization or reinforced with wire or glass fiber. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001;86:613-619.

    Not in our library10.1067/mpr.2001.120069

  179. 179.

    Al Baker A., Habib S.R., Al Amri M.D. Preserving esthetics, occlusion and occlusal vertical dimension in a patient with fixed prostheses seeking dental implant treatment. Saudi Dent. J. 2016;28:203-208.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.05.003

  180. 180.

    Agarwal M., Nayak A., Hallikerimath R. A study to evaluate the transverse strength of repaired acrylic denture resins with conventional heat-cured, autopolymerizing and microwave-cured resins: An in vitro study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2008;8:36-41.

    Not in our library10.4103/0972-4052.43252

  181. 181.

    Faot F., Da Silva W.J., Da Rosa R.S., Del Bel Cury A.A., Garcia R.C.M.R. Strength of denture base resins repaired with auto-and visible light-polymerized materials. J. Prosthodont. Dent. 2009;18:496-502.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00470.x

  182. 182.

    Murphy W., Huggett R., Handley R., Brooks S. Rigid cold curing resins for direct use in the oral cavity. Br. Dent. J. 1986;160:391-394.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bdj.4805870

  183. 183.

    Shifman A. Clinical applications of visible light-cured resin in maxillofacial prosthetics. part I: Denture base and reline material. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990;64:578-582.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(90)90132-v

  184. 184.

    Fellman S. Visible light-cured denture resin used in making dentures with conventional teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989;62:356-359.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(89)90350-8

  185. 185.

    Polyzois G.L., Handley R.W., Stafford G.D. Repair strength of denture base resins using various methods. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 1995;3:183-186.

    Not in our library

  186. 186.

    Jacobsen N.L., Mitchell D.L., Johnson D.L., Holt R.A. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997;78:153-158.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70119-7

  187. 187.

    Jagger R.G., al-Athel M.S., Jagger D.C., Vowles R.W. Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2002;15:55-58.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.

    Vojdani M., Rezaei S., Zareeian L. Effect of chemical surface treatments and repair material on transverse strength of repaired acrylic denture resin. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2008;19:2-5.

    Not in our library10.4103/0970-9290.38923

  189. 189.

    Vallittu P.K., Lassila V.P., Lappalainen R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994;72:639-643.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(94)90297-6

  190. 190.

    Minami H., Suzuki S., Minesaki Y., Kurashige H., Tanaka T. In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on the bonding of autopolymerizing resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2004;91:164-170.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.023

  191. 191.

    Seó R.S., Neppelenbroek K.H., Filho J.N.A. Factors affecting the strength of denture repairs. J. Prosthodont. 2007;16:302-310.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00191.x

  192. 192.

    Ahmed Z.U., Flynn J., Riedel E.R., Huryn J.M., Rosen E.B. Definitive maxillary obturator prosthesis: Timelines for fabrication and follow-up. Spec. Care Dent. 2020;40:315-319.

    Not in our library10.1111/scd.12471

  193. 193.

    Molinero-Mourelle P., Helm A., Cobo-Vázquez C., Lam W.Y., Azevedo L., Pow E.H., Gómez-Polo M. Treatment outcomes of implant-supported maxillary obturator prostheses in patients with maxillary defects: A systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2020;33:429-440.

    Not in our library10.11607/ijp.6642

  194. 194.

    Urechescu H., Pricop M., Bogdan L., Nes C.S., Pricop C., Rusu L.C., Rivis M. Experimental compression and traction tests on heat-cured pmma used in maxillary obturator prostheses. Mat. Plast. 2016;53:76.

    Not in our library

  195. 195.

    Urechescu H., Pricop M., Pricop C., Mateas M., Natanael S., Galatanu S.V. Thermoplastic materials used for fabrication of maxillary obturator prostheses. Mat. Plast. 2017;54:477.

    Not in our library10.37358/mp.17.3.4874

  196. 196.

    Metwaly A.F., Taha E.R. Evaluation of microbial adhesions and quality of life in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with cobalt-chromium and thermoplastic obturators. Egypt. Dent. J. 2017;63:3639-3650.

    Not in our library10.21608/edj.2017.76429

  197. 197.

    Koyama S., Kato H., Harata T., Sasaki K. A workflow for fabricating a hollow obturator by using 3D digital technologies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;123:648-652.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.020

  198. 198.

    Jang W., Lim H., Yun K., Park C., Yang H. Fabrication of closed hollow obturator for hard palate defect patient undergone maxillectomy. J. Korean Acad. Prosthodont. 2020;58:30-34.

    Not in our library10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.30

  199. 199.

    Sharma P., Mago G. Rehabilitation of patient with hemimaxillectomy defect using a closed hollow bulb obturator: A case report. J. Adv. Med. Dent. Sci. Res. 2020;8:107-110.

    Not in our library

  200. 200.

    Ramasamy T.V., Chandra J. An innovative sectional silicone obturator in a patient with partial maxillectomy: A Case report. J. Indian. Prosthodont. Soc. 2020;20:115-119.

    Not in our library10.4103/jips.jips_171_19

  201. 201.

    Qoran A.H., Aminifar S., Adli A.R., Abachizadeh H. Using a silicone core to reduce the weight of maxillary obturator prosthesis. J. Dent. Sch. 2012;30:136-142.

    Not in our library

  202. 202.

    Bidra A.S., Taylor T.D., Agar J.R. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2013;109:361-366.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60318-2

  203. 203.

    Alp G., Murat S., Yilmaz B. Comparison of Flexural Strength of Different CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers. J. Prosthodont. 2019;28:491-495.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12755

  204. 204.

    Al-Dwairi Z.N., Tahboub K.Y., Baba N.Z., Goodacre C.J. A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). J. Prosthodont. 2020;29:341-349.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12926

  205. 205.

    Arslan M., Murat S., Alp G., Zaimoglu A. Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 2018;21:31-40.

    Not in our library

  206. 206.

    Al-Dwairi Z.N., Tahboub K.Y., Baba N.Z., Goodacre C.J., Özcan M. A comparison of the surface properties of CAD/CAM and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). J. Prosthodont. 2019;28:452-457.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.13033

  207. 207.

    Murat S., Alp G., Alatalı C., Uzun M. In vitro evaluation of adhesion of candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers. J. Prosthodont. 2019;28:873-879.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12942

  208. 208.

    Srinivasan M., Gjengedal H., Cattani-Lorente M., Moussa M., Durual S., Schimmel M., Müller F. CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness. Dent. Mater. J. 2018;2017-2207.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2017-207

  209. 209.

    Choi J.J.E., Uy C.E., Plaksina P., Ramani R.S., Ganjigatti R., Waddell J.N. Bond Strength of denture teeth to heat-cured, CAD/CAM and 3D printed denture acrylics. J. Prosthodont. 2020;29:415-421.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.13125

  210. 210.

    Kalberer N., Mehl A., Schimmel M., Müller F., Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019;121:637-643.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.001

  211. 211.

    Davda K., Osnes C., Dillon S., Wu J., Hyde T., Keeling A. An investigation into the trueness and precision of copy denture templates produced by rapid prototyping and conventional means. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2017;25:186-192.

    Not in our library10.1922/ejprd_01716davda07

  212. 212.
    Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? · 2016
    No notice
  213. 213.

    Quirynen M., Marechal M., Busscher H., Weerkamp A., Darius P., van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation: An in vivo study in man. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1990;17:138-144.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01077.x

  214. 214.

    Quirynen M.v., Van Der Mei H., Bollen C., Schotte A., Marechal M., Doornbusch G., Naert I., Busscher H. v., Van Steenberghe D. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra-and subgingival plaque. J. Dent. Res. 1993;72:1304-1309.

    Not in our library10.1177/00220345930720090801

  215. 215.

    Iqbal Z., Zafar M.S. Role of antifungal medicaments added to tissue conditioners: A systematic review. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016;60:231-239.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.006

  216. 216.

    Gendreau L., Loewy Z.G. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. J. Prosthodont. 2011;20:251-260.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00698.x

  217. 217.

    Hoshi N., Mori H., Taguchi H., Taniguchi M., Aoki H., Sawada T., Kawabata M., Kuwabara A., Oono A., Tanaka K., et al. Management of oral candidiasis in denture wearers. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2011;55:48-52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpor.2010.03.004

  218. 218.

    de Oliveira C.E., Gasparoto T.H., Dionisio T.J., Porto V.C., Vieira N.A., Santos C.F., Lara V.S. Candida albicans and denture stomatitis: Evaluation of its presence in the lesion, prosthesis, and blood. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2010;23:158-159.

    Not in our library

  219. 219.

    Amin W.M., Al-Ali M.H., Salim N.A., Al-Tarawneh S.K. A new form of intraoral delivery of antifungal drugs for the treatment of denture-induced oral candidosis. Eur. J. Dent. 2009;3:257-266.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0039-1697442

  220. 220.

    Huettig F., Prutscher A., Goldammer C., Kreutzer C.A., Weber H. First clinical experiences with CAD/CAM-fabricated PMMA-based fixed dental prostheses as long-term temporaries. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016;20:161-168.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00784-015-1475-7

  221. 221.

    Moshkelgosha V., Shomali M., Momeni M.A.S.O.O.M.E.H. Comparison of wear resistance of hawley and vacuum formed retainers: An in-vitro study. J. Dent. Biomater. 2016;3:248-253.

    Not in our library

  222. 222.

    Casey J., Dunn W.J., Wright E. In vitro wear of various orthotic device materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90:498-502.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00545-6

  223. 223.

    Rantala L., Lastumäki T., Peltomäki T., Vallittu P. Fatigue resistance of removable orthodontic appliance reinforced with glass fibre weave. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:501-506.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01108.x

  224. 224.

    Faltermeier A., Rosentritt M., Müssig D. Acrylic removable appliances: Comparative evaluation of different postpolymerization methods. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007;131:301.e16-301.e22.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.019

  225. 225.

    Namura Y., Takamizawa T., Uchida Y., Inaba M., Noma D., Takemoto T., Miyazaki M., Motoyoshi M. Effects of composition on the hardness of orthodontic adhesives. J. Oral Sci. 2020;62:48-51.

    Not in our library10.2334/josnusd.19-0035

  226. 226.

    Habib S.R., Azad A.A. Comparison of patient’s satisfaction with replacement complete dentures fabricated by copy denture technique versus conventional technique. J. Pak. Dent. Assoc. 2009;18:9-13.

    Not in our library

  227. 227.

    Habib S.R., Al Ajmi M.G., Al Dhafyan M., Jomah A., Abualsaud H., Almashali M. Effect of margin designs on the marginal adaptation of zirconia copings. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2017;51:179-187.

    Not in our library10.15644/asc51/3/1

  228. 228.

    Habib S.R., Ali M., Al Hossan A., Majeed-Saidan A., Al Qahtani M. Effect of cementation, cement type and vent holes on fit of zirconia copings. Saudi Dent. J. 2019;31:45-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.09.001

  229. 229.

    Zafar M.S., Al-Samadani K.H. Potential use of natural silk for bio-dental applications. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2014;9:171-177.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.01.003

  230. 230.

    Tsuchiya H., Hoshino Y., Tajima K., Takagi N. Leaching and cytotoxicity of formaldehyde and methyl methacrylate from acrylic resin denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994;71:618-624.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(94)90448-0

  231. 231.

    Nandal S., Ghalaut P., Shekhawat H., Gulati M.S. New era in denture base resins: A review. Dent. J. Adv. Stud. 2013;1:136-143.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0038-1671969

  232. 232.

    Cierech M., Osica I., Kolenda A., Wojnarowicz J., Szmigiel D., Łojkowski W., Kurzydłowski K., Ariga K., Mierzwińska-Nastalska E. Mechanical and physicochemical properties of newly formed ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites for denture bases. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:305.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano8050305

  233. 233.

    Khan A.S., Azam M.T., Khan M., Mian S.A., Rehman I.U. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composites: A systematic review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2015;47:26-39.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.015

  234. 234.

    Xu H., Schumacher G.E., Eichmiller F., Peterson R., Antonucci J.M., Mueller H. Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:523-530.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00100-8

  235. 235.

    Petersen R.C. Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length. J. Dent. Res. 2005;84:365-370.

    Not in our library10.1177/154405910508400414

  236. 236.

    Hyer M.W., White S.R. Stress Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials. 2009.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    van Heumen C.C., Kreulen C.M., Bronkhorst E.M., Lesaffre E., Creugers N.H. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1435-1443.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.006

  238. 238.

    Butterworth C., Ellakwa A.E., Shortall A. Fibre-reinforced composites in restorative dentistry. Dent. Update. 2003;30:300-306.

    Not in our library10.12968/denu.2003.30.6.300

  239. 239.

    Garoushi S., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L.V. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2008;66:38-42.

    Not in our library10.1080/00016350801918377

  240. 240.

    Topouzi M., Kontonasaki E., Bikiaris D., Papadopoulou L., Paraskevopoulos K.M., Koidis P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for interim fixed prostheses with silica nanoparticles. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017;69:213-222.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.013

  241. 241.

    Ratanajanchai M., Kanchanavasita W., Suputtamongkol K., Wonglamsam A., Thamapipol S., Sae-Khow O. Heat-cured poly(methyl methacrylate) resin incorporated with different food preservatives as an anti-microbial denture base material. J. Dent. Sci. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jds.2020.09.006

  242. 242.

    DeBoer J., Vermilyea S., Brady R. The effect of carbon fiber orientation on the fatigue resistance and bending properties of two denture resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1984;51:119-121.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3913(84)80117-1

  243. 243.

    Alla R.K., Sajjan S., Alluri V.R., Ginjupalli K., Upadhya N. Influence of fiber reinforcement on the properties of denture base resins. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2013;4:91.

    Not in our library10.4236/jbnb.2013.41012

  244. 244.

    Kanie T., Fujii K., Arikawa H., Inoue K. Flexural properties and impact strength of denture base polymer reinforced with woven glass fibers. Dent. Mater. 2000;16:150-158.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00097-4

  245. 245.

    John J., Gangadhar S.A., Shah I. Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001;86:424-427.

    Not in our library10.1067/mpr.2001.118564

  246. 246.

    Ladizesky N.H., Chow T.W., Cheng Y.Y. Denture base reinforcement using woven polyethylene fiber. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1994;7:307-314.

    Not in our library

  247. 247.

    Ladizesky N.H., Ho C.F., Chow T.W. Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1992;68:934-939.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-3913(92)90554-n

  248. 248.

    Singh K., Sharma S.K., Negi P., Kumar M., Rajpurohit D., Khobre P. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of heat polymerised denture base resins after reinforcement with glass fibres and nylon fibres: An in vitro study. Adv. Hum. Biol. 2016;6:91.

    Not in our library10.4103/2321-8568.190315

  249. 249.

    Farina A.P., Cecchin D., Soares R.G., Botelho A.L., Takahashi J.M.F.K., Mazzetto M.O., Mesquita M.F. Evaluation of vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement. Gerodontology. 2012;29:155-160.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00435.x

  250. 250.

    Vallittu P.K. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J. Prosthodont. 1996;5:270-276.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.1996.tb00511.x

  251. 251.

    Chong K., Chai J. Strength and mode of failure of unidirectional and bidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite materials. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2003;16:161-166.

    Not in our library

  252. 252.

    McDonough W.G., Antonucci J.M., Dunkers J.P. Interfacial shear strengths of dental resin-glass fibers by the microbond test. Dent. Mater. 2001;17:492-498.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00008-2

  253. 253.

    Matinlinna J.P., Lassila L.V., Özcan M., Yli-Urpo A., Vallittu P.K. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004;17:155-164.

    Not in our library

  254. 254.

    Nejatian T., Johnson A., Van Noort R. Reinforcement of denture base resin. Advances in Science and Technology. 2006;Volume 49:124-129.

    Not in our library

  255. 255.

    Kul E., Aladağ L.İ., Yesildal R. Evaluation of thermal conductivity and flexural strength properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base material reinforced with different fillers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016;116:803-810.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.006

  256. 256.

    Mansour M.M., Wagner W.C., Chu T.G. Effect of mica reinforcement on the flexural strength and microhardness of polymethyl methacrylate denture resin. J. Prosthodont. 2013;22:179-183.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00923.x

  257. 257.

    Casemiro L.A., Martins C.H.G., Pires-de-Souza F.d.C., Panzeri H. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of acrylic resins with incorporated silver–zinc zeolite—Part I. Gerodontology. 2008;25:187-194.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00198.x

  258. 258.

    Flores J.C., Garcia R., Villanueva G., Acosta-Torres L. Antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) with silver nanoparticles for dentistry: A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:4007.

    Not in our library

  259. 259.

    Kurt A., Erkose-Genc G., Uzun M., Emrence Z., Ustek D., Isik-Ozkol G. The antifungal activity and cytotoxicity of silver containing denture base material. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2017;20:290-295.

    Not in our library10.4103/1119-3077.181362

  260. 260.

    Acosta-Torres L.S., Mendieta I., Nunez-Anita R.E., Cajero-Juarez M., Castano V.M. Cytocompatible antifungal acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles for dentures. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012;7:4777-4786.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s32391

  261. 261.

    Monteiro D.R., Gorup L.F., Takamiya A.S., de Camargo E.R., Filho A.C.R., Barbosa D.B. Silver distribution and release from an antimicrobial denture base resin containing silver colloidal nanoparticles. J. Prosthodont. 2012;21:7-15.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00772.x

  262. 262.

    Sawada T., Sawada T., Kumasaka T., Hamada N., Shibata T., Nonami T., Kimoto K. Self-cleaning effects of acrylic resin containing fluoridated apatite-coated titanium dioxide. Gerodontology. 2014;31:68-75.

    Not in our library10.1111/ger.12052

  263. 263.

    Shibata T., Hamada N., Kimoto K., Sawada T., Sawada T., Kumada H., Umemoto T., Toyoda M. Antifungal effect of acrylic resin containing apatite-coated TiO2 photocatalyst. Dent. Mater. J. 2007;26:437-444.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.26.437

  264. 264.

    Al-Bakri I., Harty D., Al-Omari W., Swain M., Chrzanowski W., Ellakwa A. Surface characteristics and microbial adherence ability of modified polymethylmethacrylate by fluoridated glass fillers. Aust. Dent. J. 2014;59:482-489.

    Not in our library10.1111/adj.12218

  265. 265.

    Tsutsumi C., Takakuda K., Wakabayashi N. Reduction of Candida biofilm adhesion by incorporation of prereacted glass ionomer filler in denture base resin. J. Dent. 2016;44:37-43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.010

  266. 266.

    Lee J., El-Fiqi A., Jo J., Kim D., Kim S., Jun S., Kim H., Lee H. Development of long-term antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) by incorporating mesoporous silica nanocarriers. Dent. Mater. 2016;32:1564-1574.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.001

  267. 267.

    Alwan S.A., Alameer S.S. The effect of the addition of silanized nano titania fillers on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured acrylic denture base materials. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;325:1-12.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015269

  268. 268.

    Bacali C., Badea M., Moldovan M., Sarosi C., Nastase V., Baldea I., Chiorean R.S., Constantiniuc M. The influence of graphene in improvement of physico-mechanical properties in PMMA denture base resins. Materials. 2019;12:2335.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12142335

  269. 269.

    Zafar M.S., Alnazzawi A.A., Alrahabi M., Fareed M.A., Najeeb S., Khurshid Z., Khurshid Z., Najeeb S., Zafar M.S., Sefat F. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials in dentistry. Advanced Dental Biomaterials. 2019;477-505.

    Not in our library

  270. 270.

    Yu W., Wang X., Tang Q., Guo M., Zhao J. Reinforcement of denture base PMMA with ZrO2 nanotubes. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014;32:192-197.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.003

  271. 271.

    Yadav P., Mittal R., Sood V.K., Garg R. Effect of incorporation of silane-treated silver and aluminum microparticles on strength and thermal conductivity of PMMA. J. Prosthodont. 2012;21:546-551.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00873.x

  272. 272.

    Aljafery A., MAH B. Effect of addition ZrO2-Al2O3 nanoparticles mixture on some properties and denture base adaptation of heat cured acrylic resin denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;325:1-15.

    Not in our library

  273. 273.

    Muklif O.R., Ismail I.J. Studying the effect of addition a composite of silanized Nano-Al2O3 and plasma treated polypropylene fibers on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured PMMA denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;325:1-13.

    Not in our library10.12816/0015029

  274. 274.

    Khurshid Z., Zafar M., Qasim S., Shahab S., Naseem M., AbuReqaiba A. Advances in nanotechnology for restorative dentistry. Materials. 2015;8:717-731.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma8020717

  275. 275.

    Hari Prasad A., Kalavathy M., Mohammed H. Effect of glass fiber and silane treated glass fiber reinforcement on impact strength of maxillary complete denture. Ann. Essen. Dent. 2011;4:7-12.

    Not in our library10.5368/aedj.2011.3.4.1.2

  276. 276.

    Salman T.A., Khalaf H.A. The influence of adding of modified ZrO2-TiO2 nanoparticles on certain physical and mechanical properties of heat polymerized acrylic resin. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015;325:1-15.

    Not in our library

  277. 277.

    Abdulkareem M.M., Hatim N.A. Evaluation the biological effect of adding aluminum oxide, silver nanoparticles into microwave treated PMMA powder. Int. J. Enhanc. Res. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2015;4:172-178.

    Not in our library

  278. 278.

    Bian Y.M., Zhang X.Y., Zhu B.S., Yu W.Q., Ruan D.P., Min M. Influence of different amount of silane coupling agent on the flexural strength of PMMA/nanometer ZrO2 composites. Shanghai J. Stomatol. 2007;16:319-323.

    Not in our library

  279. 279.

    Asopa V., Suresh S., Khandelwal M., Sharma V., Asopa S.S., Kaira L.S. A comparative evaluation of properties of zirconia reinforced high impact acrylic resin with that of high impact acrylic resin. Saudi J. Dent. Res. 2015;6:146-151.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.02.003

  280. 280.

    Ahmed M.A., El-Shennawy M., Althomali Y.M., Omar A.A. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different types of acrylic resin denture base. World J. Nano. Sci. Eng. 2016;6:111-119.

    Not in our library10.4236/wjnse.2016.63011

  281. 281.

    Elshereksi N., Mohamed S., Arifin A., Mohd Ishak Z. Effect of filler incorporation on the fracture toughness properties of denture base poly (methyl methacrylate). J. Phys. Sci. 2009;20:1-12.

    Not in our library

  282. 282.

    Protopapa P., Kontonasaki E., Bikiaris D., Paraskevopoulos K.M., Koidis P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for fixed interim prostheses with nanodiamonds. Dent. Mater. J. 2011;30:222-231.

    Not in our library10.4012/dmj.2010-135

  283. 283.

    Mangal U., Kim J., Seo J., Kwon J., Choi S. Novel poly (methyl methacrylate) containing nanodiamond to improve the mechanical properties and fungal resistance. Materials. 2019;12:3438.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12203438

  284. 284.

    Fouda S.M., Gad M.M., Ellakany P., Al-Thobity A.M., Al-Harbi F.A., Virtanen J.I., Raustia A. The effect of nanodiamonds on candida albicans adhesion and surface characteristics of PMMA denture base material-an in vitro study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2019;27:20180779.

    Not in our library10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0779

  285. 285.

    McNally T., Pötschke P., Halley P., Murphy M., Martin D., Bell S.E.J., Brennan G.P., Bein D., Lemoine P., Quinn J.P. Polyethylene multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Polymer. 2005;46:8222-8232.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.094

  286. 286.

    Collins P.G., Avouris P. Nanotubes for electronics. Sci. Am. 2000;283:62-69.

    Not in our library10.1038/scientificamerican1200-62

  287. 287.

    Rodford R. Further development and evaluation of high impact strength denture base materials. J. Dent. 1990;18:151-157.

    Not in our library10.1016/0300-5712(90)90056-k

  288. 288.

    Delfi M., Ghomi M., Zarrabi A., Mohammadinejad R., Taraghdari Z.B., Ashrafizadeh M., Zare E.N., Agarwal T., Padil V.V., Mokhtari B. Functionalization of polymers and nanomaterials for biomedical applications: Antimicrobial platforms and drug carriers. Prosthesis. 2020;2:117-139.

    Not in our library10.3390/prosthesis2020012

  289. 289.

    Rouabhia M., Chmielewski W. Diseases associated with oral polymicrobial biofilms. Open Mycol. J. 2012;6:27-32.

    Not in our library10.2174/1874437001206010027

  290. 290.

    Makvandi P., Gu J.T., Zare E.N., Ashtari B., Moeini A., Tay F.R., Niu L. Polymeric and inorganic nanoscopical antimicrobial fillers in dentistry. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:69-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.025

  291. 291.

    Akihiro Yoshihara D., Sakuma P.S., Kobayashi P.S., Miyazaki P.H. Antimicrobial effect of fluoride mouthrinse on mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in saliva. Pediatr. Dent. 2001;23:113-117.

    Not in our library

  292. 292.

    Gad M.M., Al-Thobity A.M., Fouda S.M., Näpänkangas R., Raustia A. Flexural and surface properties of PMMA denture base material modified with thymoquinone as an antifungal agent. J. Prosthodont. 2020;29:243-250.

    Not in our library10.1111/jopr.12967

  293. 293.

    Makvandi P., Jamaledin R., Jabbari M., Nikfarjam N., Borzacchiello A. Antibacterial quaternary ammonium compounds in dental materials: A systematic review. Dent. Mater. 2018;34:851-867.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.014

  294. 294.

    Makvandi P., Ghaemy M., Mohseni M. Synthesis and characterization of photo-curable bis-quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate with antimicrobial activity for dental restoration materials. Eur. Polym. J. 2016;74:81-90.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.11.011

  295. 295.

    Makvandi P., Ghaemy M., Ghadiri A., Mohseni M. Photocurable, antimicrobial quaternary ammonium–modified nanosilica. J. Dent. Res. 2015;94:1401-1407.

    Not in our library10.1177/0022034515599973

  296. 296.

    Pesci-Bardon C., Fosse T., Serre D., Madinier I. In vitro antiseptic properties of an ammonium compound combined with denture base acrylic resin. Gerodontology. 2006;23:111-116.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00088.x

  297. 297.

    Pesci-Bardon C., Fosse T., Madinier I., Serre D. In vitro new dialysis protocol to assay the antiseptic properties of a quaternary ammonium compound polymerized with denture acrylic resin. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;39:226-231.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01569.x

  298. 298.

    Mai H., Kim D., Hyun D.C., Park J.H., Lee S.M., Lee D. A new antibacterial agent-releasing polydimethylsiloxane coating for polymethyl methacrylate dental restorations. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1831.

    Not in our library10.3390/jcm8111831

  299. 299.

    Lee J., Jo J., Kim D., Patel K.D., Kim H., Lee H. Nano-graphene oxide incorporated into PMMA resin to prevent microbial adhesion. Dent. Mater. 2018;34:63-72.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.019

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.