Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle

Thi Lan Anh Nguyen, Debanjana Bhattacharya

Molecules · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/molecules27082494

Abstract

Quercetin, an essential plant flavonoid, possesses a variety of pharmacological activities. Extensive literature investigates its antimicrobial activity and possible mechanism of action. Quercetin has been shown to inhibit the growth of different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi and viruses. The mechanism of its antimicrobial action includes cell membrane damage, change of membrane permeability, inhibition of synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins, reduction of expression of virulence factors, mitochondrial dysfunction, and preventing biofilm formation. Quercetin has also been shown to inhibit the growth of various drug-resistant microorganisms, thereby suggesting its use as a potent antimicrobial agent against drug-resistant strains. Furthermore, certain structural modifications of quercetin have sometimes been shown to enhance its antimicrobial activity compared to that of the parent molecule. In this review, we have summarized the antimicrobial activity of quercetin with a special focus on its mechanistic principle. Therefore, this review will provide further insights into the scientific understanding of quercetin’s mechanism of action, and the implications for its use as a clinically relevant antimicrobial agent.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Quercetin is an important phytochemical, belonging to the flavonoid group of polyphenols. It is widely distributed in various fruits, vegetables, beverages as well as in flowers, leaves, seeds, etc.. The most abundant source of quercetin is onion (Allium cepa), which is one of the most popular vegetables used both as an edible and medicinal plant. Other sources of quercetin include tea, red wine, kales and apples. Many medicinal plants such as Hypericum perforatum, Ginkgo biloba also contain quercetin. The molecular formula of quercetin is C15H10O7, and its chemical structure is illustrated in Figure 1. Its molecular structure contains a ketocarbonyl group, and the oxygen atom present on the first carbon, being basic, can form salts with acids. Furthermore, a dihydroxy group between the A ring, o-dihydroxy group B, C ring C2, C3 double bond, and 4-carbonyl are the active groups present in quercetin. Quercetin’s biological activities have been largely attributed to these active phenolic hydroxyl groups and double bonds.

Quercetin possesses many pharmacological activities such as antioxidant, anticancer, antiviral, antimicrobial, neuroprotection, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular and anti-obesity. Recently, quercetin has also achieved GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status by the United States Food and Drug Organization. The antimicrobial activity of quercetin has been widely studied by many researchers and has been considered as a potential therapy against different pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, multidrug resistance (MDR) in bacteria has become a major problem worldwide due to the continuous use of antibiotics against bacterial infections. Treatment of these MDR strains has posed a major challenge to the pharmaceutical industry. However, bioactive compounds isolated from different plants, fruits, vegetables, beverages, etc., have gained recent interest in the scientific community due to their beneficial effects in human health. The mechanism of antimicrobial action of these phytochemicals has been extensively investigated currently, in order to utilize them effectively in drug development. Studies on the pharmaceutical properties of quercetin have shown that it can be formulated as a potent natural antimicrobial agent against various pathogenic microorganisms.

In this review, we have summarized the antimicrobial activity of quercetin, with a special focus on its underlying mechanistic principle. Therefore, this review will help future researchers to have a scientific understanding of quercetin’s role in inhibiting microbial diseases as well as its application as a potential antimicrobial agent in the clinical world.

2. Antimicrobial Activity

Quercetin is antibacterial against a wide range of bacterial strains, particularly those affecting the gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary, and integumentary systems. Quercetin’s antibacterial ability has been linked to its solubility and its interplay with the bacterial cell membrane, which is largely determined by the presence of quercetin’s hydroxyl groups. In general, Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to the bactericidal effects of quercetin than Gram-positive bacteria. The discrepancy in quercetin susceptibility between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria might be partially attributable to the difference in cell membrane composition between the two types of bacteria. However, some quercetin derivatives showed stronger antibacterial ability against Gram-negative than Gram-positive bacteria. Phosphorylation and sulfation of quercetin at different hydroxyl groups were able to enhance or reduce its solubility, and thus altered its antibacterial potential to certain types of bacteria.

The antibacterial activity of quercetin and quercetin derivatives against different bacterial species occurred at different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Shu, et al. observed quercetin’s antibacterial effects on the growth of eleven main oral pathogenic microbes: quercetin impeded the growth of six out of the eleven tested microbes including Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilu, Streptococcus sanguis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemocomitans, and Prevotella intermedia with MIC ranging from 1–8 mg/mL. S. mutans growth was inhibited on adhesive–dentin interfaces doped with quercetin at MIC of 500 µg/mL. Quercetin also exerted inhibitory effects against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa at MIC of 20 mcg/mL. Moreover, quercetin-5,3′-dimethylether exhibited antibacterial effects against Micrococcus luteus and Shigella sonei at MIC of 25 mcg/mL. Quercetin was also shown to exert antibacterial activities against different Gram-positive bacteria such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and Standard Enterococcus.

In addition, quercetin acted synergistically in combination with other chemotherapeutic compounds and antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacteria. When Pseudomonas fluorescens, a bacterium implicated in food spoilage, was treated with quercetin along with lactoferrin and hydroxyapatite, the MIC was significantly reduced compared with when the bacteria were treated with quercetin alone. Quercetin further proved its antibacterial ability when working in conjunction with other antibiotics against methicillin-resistant S. aureus..

3. Antifungal Activity

Although quercetin’s antifungal effects are not as well documented as its antibacterial properties, quercetin has been reported to have antifungal potentials against Aspergillus fumigatus (16–64 μM) and Aspergillus niger.

Quercetin sensitized other drugs against resistant fungal infections. Oliveira, et al. found quercetin’s antifungal potentials against Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans to be insignificant. However, when combined with amphotericin B, quercetin significantly enhanced amphotericin B’s antifungal efficacy against C. neoformans strains and reduced amphotericin B’s side effects, which Oliveira, et al. explained may be due to quercetin’s antioxidant effects. Similarly, Gao, et al. showed that almost no cell death occurred when fluconazole-resistant C. albicans was treated with quercetin alone, while cell death was increased significantly when fluconazole-resistant C. albicans was treated with a quercetin–fluconazole combination. Quercetin’s antifungal activity was also observed against Candida spp., C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

4. Antiviral Activity

Quercetin and its derivatives have long been studied for their antiviral effects. In vitro, quercetin and its derivatives were antiviral against a variety of viruses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), poliovirus, Sindbis virus, respiratory viruses, and Mayarovirus. In vivo, when administered orally, quercetin offers mice infected with Mengo virus some level of protection against lethal infections.

In vitro, quercetin enhanced acyclovir’s antiviral ability against herpesviruses. In vivo, when used with vitamin C, quercetin helped prevent and treat patients with early respiratory tract infections, especially including COVID-19 patients. A clinical study showed that when treated with Quercetin Phytosome, patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms had shorter time to virus clearance. Quercetin was also found to exert antiviral activity against several serotypes of Rhinovirus, Coxsackievirus (A21 and B1), Poliovirus (type 1 Sabin) and Echovirus (type 7, 11, 12, and 19).

5.1. Disruption of Bacterial Cell Walls and Cell Membrane

Recent studies have demonstrated that quercetin has the ability to effectively disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth. Using TEM analysis, Wang, et al. observed that quercetin effectively disrupted the structural integrity of cell wall and cell membrane of E. coli and S. aureus at concentrations of 50× MIC and 10× MIC, respectively. In treated E. coli, the damaged cell wall showed numerous structural abnormalities such as prominent lysis of cell wall, cell distortion, leakage of cytoplasmic materials, cytoplasmic membrane separated from the cell wall, as well as uneven endochylema density. Eventually, cell cavitation and cell death were evident. Similarly, in treated S. aureus, significant disruption of the cell wall, thinning of cell membranes, chromatin lysis, leakage of endochylema contents, uneven endochylema density, shedding of extracellular pilli, as well as nuclear cavitation were noted. In this study, the basic mechanism of antibacterial activity was disruption of the permeability of bacterial cell walls and cell membranes, as detected by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and β-galactosidase activities. Another research group, Zhao et. al., determined potent antibacterial activity of sugarcane bagasse (containing 470 mg quercetin/g polyphenol) extract against S. aureus, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Salomonella typhimurium. The primary antibacterial mechanism was found to be disruption of the cell membrane structure and permeability due to an increase in electrical conductivity, thereby leading to leakage of cellular electrolytes. Results showing damage of cellular proteins were also obtained from protein gel electrophoresis. Moreover, abnormalities in cell morphology and damage of internal structures were evident from SEM and TEM images in E. coli and S. aureus suspensions treated with their respective MICs, as compared with the untreated ones.

In another study, quercetin-loaded nanoparticles significantly inhibited the growth of drug-resistant E. coli and Bacillus subtilis, causing disruption of the cell wall and membrane, as determined by AFM, SEM and TEM analyses. Quercetin also produced growth inhibitory activity against ceftazidime-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes; the main mechanisms being damage to the cytoplasmic membrane, disappearing of peptidoglycan, and distortion of cell shape. Quercetin was also found to disrupt the cell membrane structure and integrity in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii as well as carbapenem-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

5.2. Disruption of Nucleic Acid Synthesis

Quercetin also plays an important role in inhibiting the synthesis of nucleic acids in bacterial cells. It has been found that quercetin was able to inhibit the function of E. coli DNA gyrase, thereby leading to disruption of DNA synthesis. In a recent study, Plaper, et al. reported that quercetin inhibited the ATPase activity of E. coli DNA gyrase enzyme by binding to the submit GyrB. In this study, they determined the enzyme- binding activity of quercetin by measuring the fluorescence of isolated DNA gyrase subunits in both the presence and absence of quercetin. The binding site was found to be overlapped with that of ATP and the antibiotic novobiocin. Quercetin fluorescence was inferred when these compounds were added to the test samples, resulting in a competitive inhibition of quercetin’s activity. Inhibition of ATPase activity of GyrB was also determined by a coupled ATPase assay. Therefore, from these studies, it can be said that quercetin’s ability to inhibit the function of DNA gyrase enzyme is partially responsible for its antibacterial activity.

Furthermore, Liu, et al. predicted that the antibacterial mechanism of quercetin against the growth of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp in laying hens was by inhibiting the DNA supercoiling activity of gyrase. This ultimately led to disruption of bacterial DNA replication. These findings were in agreement with the results of Ohemeng, et al. and supported the fact that the inhibition of DNA gyrase activity might be partially responsible for the antibacterial activity of quercetin.

In a recent study, it was shown that quercetin in a complex with iron was able to intercalate with DNA and cause significant cleavage of the supercoiled form of DNA into nicked circular form. Here, the antibacterial mechanism of quercetin was attributed to its nuclease activity. Quercetin was also found to bind to bacterial single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein (SSB) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thereby inhibiting bacterial DNA synthesis.

5.3. Inhibition of Biofilm Formation

Another antibacterial mechanism of quercetin is prevention of biofilm formation by various bacterial species. Quercetin is known to interfere with the pathways involved in bacterial quorum sensing, thereby preventing bacterial adhesion to target organs. In a recent study, quercetin was found to inhibit almost 95% of the biofilm production of Enterococcus faecalis, a Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen. In this study, quercetin showed antibacterial activity at sub-MIC values, and its biofilm inhibitory activity was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Furthermore, the authors used proteomics analysis and real-time PCR to determine that quercetin interfered with the proper functioning of the proteins involved in glycolytic, protein folding and protein translation–elongation pathways, thereby disrupting cell physiology and preventing biofilm formation. In another study by Dias da Costa Júnior, et al., quercetin displayed anti-biofilm activity and inhibited almost 50% of biofilm production of methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus at sub-MIC doses.

Recent studies have demonstrated that quercetin effectively inhibits the quorum sensing mechanism in P. aeruginosa primarily by decreasing its biofilm formation, swimming motility and production of various virulence factors such as protease, elastase, pyocyanin. These results also agree with that of Manner, et al.. They have also reported that quercetin was able to significantly inhibit the production of the pigment violacein, an indicator if bacterial quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum, thereby affecting the bacterial quorum-sensing mechanism. Quercetin was also found to interfere with the swarming and swimming motility of P. aeruginosa, thus inhibiting bacterial biofilm formation and quorum sensing. Recently, it was found that a nanoparticle complex made up of quercetin and chitosan (quercetin-chitosan nanoplex) affected bacterial quorum sensing by significantly inhibiting the biofilm formation and swimming motility of P. aeruginosa. The biofilm formation of a common oral pathogen S. mutans, which is the main causative agent of caries, was also inhibited by quercetin. Moreover, quercetin inhibited the biofilm formation of drug-resistant S. aureus as well as suppressed the expression of bacterial adhesion genes. Quercetin was found to inhibit biofilm production of L. monocytogenes by affecting surface colonization and by reducing cell attachment and secretion of extracellular proteins.

According to Kim, et al., the biofilm production of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faceium was inhibited by about 70% by a quercetin–pivaloxymethyl conjugate. They also found that this conjugate showed a synergistic effect with several antibiotics such as vancomycin, ampicillin and cefepime against resistant strains of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus. Quercetin inhibited the biofilm formation of the Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis FB17. Vanaraj, et al. found that quercetin–silver nanoparticles effectively inhibited quorum sensing by decreasing the production of violacein in the reporter bacterium C. violaceum as well as reducing the formation of biofilm and expression of virulence genes in multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In another study by Yang, et al., it was found that quercetin-doped adhesive was able to inhibit the biofilm formation of the Streptococcus mutans strain Ingbritt.

Anti-biofilm activity of quercetin was also observed against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 by inhibiting the activity of sortase A, P. aeruginosa by affecting the lasIR quorum sensing system via vfr, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Vibrio harveyi, Staphylococcus epidermidis by downregulating the expression of intercellular adhesion proteins and a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610, enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) strain 55989, P. aeruginosa (P. a.) strain PA14, E. coli K12 strain AR3110 as well as Porphyromas gingivalis, the causative bacterium of periodontal disease. In another study, onion extracts rich in quercetin and its derivatives inhibited the swarming motility and violacein production in P. aeruginosa PAO1, and Serratia marcescens MG1.

5.4. Reduction of Expression of Virulence Factors

Additionally, quercetin possesses the ability to reduce the activities of several essential virulent enzymes, thereby hindering bacterial virulence. From the studies of He, et al., it was observed that quercetin was able to inhibit the virulence factors such as gingipain proteases, haemagglutinin, hemolytic activities of P. gingivalis in a dose-dependent manner. According to Wang, et al., quercetin inhibited the activity of coagulase enzyme, an essential virulence factor of S. aureus, thereby protecting rats from catheter-related Stapylococcul infections. Quercetin in combination with the antibiotic meropenem was found to inhibit the expression of the virulence factors blaNDM and AdeB in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Furthermore, quercetin–meropenem combination inhibited the expression of the virulence factors blaVIM and ompC in the clinical isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae belonging to the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae family.

In a recent study, quercetin was shown to downregulate the expression of virulence genes sigB, prfA, inlA, inlC, and actA in L. monocytogenes. Furthermore, quercetin was found to inhibit the activity of the virulence factor pneumolysin of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The mechanism of antibacterial activity of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 2.

6. Mechanism of Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of quercetin has also been studied recently. Although little research work has been conducted on its antifungal activity, the mechanisms mainly include disruption of the plasma membrane and inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis, protein synthesis and mitochondrial functions. The recent studies describing quercetin’s antifungal mechanism are summarized in Table 1.

The mechanism of antifungal activity of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 3.

7. Mechanism of Antiviral Activity

Quercetin has been shown to possess significant antiviral properties in recent research works. The primary mechanism of its antiviral activity includes blocking of essential viral enzymes such as polymerases, reverse transcriptase, proteases, integrase, along with suppression of DNA gyrase, and binding viral capsid proteins. The relevant experiments describing quercetin’s antiviral mechanism are demonstrated in Table 2.

The antiviral mechanism of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 4.

8. Bioavailability of Quercetin

Although quercetin has been reported to have significant antimicrobial activity, it has relatively low bioavailability. This is because it has poor solubility in water, limited permeability, it is unstable in stomach and intestine, and it has relatively short biological half-life. One study showed that free quercetin could not be found in human plasma even after an oral administration of high concentration of quercetin. Phase 2 metabolism significantly affects quercetin’s bioavailability in humans due to the fact that it is extensively metabolized in liver prior to reaching the systemic circulatory system. All these factors are responsible for causing low oral bioavailability of quercetin, thereby hindering its applications as a pharmaceutical agent. Therefore, research has been conducted to develop suitable delivery systems that would not only increase the bioavailability of quercetin but also produce significant therapeutic effects, thereby enhancing its biological activities. These delivery systems would protect quercetin molecules in the upper gastrointestinal tract and help in its prolonged release in the colon in order to increase its bioavailability.

9. Merits and Demerits

Quercetin, an essential plant flavonoid, is well known for its several pharmacological properties. Its broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and mode of action is well studied, which suggests its use as a potent antimicrobial agent in the clinical world. Some of the advantages of using phytochemicals against infectious microorganisms are that these natural compounds cause less side effects to the host compared to antibiotics, and the microorganisms become less drug resistant. However, there are several disadvantages of using these phytochemicals. Sometimes, quercetin was found to be less effective than antibiotics, and its activity increased in combination with antibiotics. In some studies, it was seen that structural modification of quercetin increased its activity significantly versus the parent molecule. Moreover, the oral bioavailability and absorption of quercetin in the human body is poor, which limits its use as a therapeutic agent.

10. Conclusions and Future Prospects

From the extensive research works conducted in the past few years, it can be concluded that quercetin exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against a variety of bacteria, fungi and virus. The mechanism of its antimicrobial activity primarily includes disruption of cell membrane integrity, inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis, inhibition of biofilm formation, mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of virulence factor expression. Furthermore, the continuous emergence of multidrug resistance in microorganisms has necessitated the search for new antimicrobial agents with a targeted mode of action, causing less side effects. Many phytochemicals isolated from different natural sources have been seen to exhibit therapeutic potentials against a number of different microorganisms; quercetin being one of the most popular and biologically active among them. The existing literature suggests broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities of quercetin, and therefore, it may be considered as a potentially useful antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral nutraceutical. However, its poor oral bioavailability and absorption in the human body hinders its use as an effective antimicrobial agent. Further work is required to enhance its bioavailability in order to exploit its therapeutic potential. Moreover, research in mechanism-based experiments, structural modification of quercetin, and investigation of the interaction between quercetin and its target sites will lead to the design of more potent antimicrobial quercetin derivatives in the future.

References 90

  1. 1.

    Osonga F.J., Akgul A., Miller R.M., Eshun G.B., Yazgan I., Akgul A., Sadik O.A. Antimicrobial Activity of a New Class of Phosphorylated and Modified Flavonoids. ACS Omega. 2019;4:12865-12871.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.9b00077

  2. 2.

    Jaisinghani R.N. Antibacterial properties of quercetin. Microbiol. Res. 2017;8:13-14.

    Not in our library10.4081/mr.2017.6877

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Kim S.J., Kim G.H. Quantification of Quercetin in different parts of onion and its DPPH radical scavenging and antibacterial activity. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2006;15:39-43.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Ozgen S., Kilinc O.K., Selamoglu Z. Antioxidant Activity of Quercetin: A Mechanistic Review. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;4:1134-1138.

    Not in our library10.24925/turjaf.v4i12.1134-1138.1069

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Alekshun M.N., Levy S.B. Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell. 2007;128:1037-1050.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.004

  8. 8.

    Yamasaki S., Asakura M., Neogi S.B., Hinenoya A., Iwaoka E., Aoki S. Inhibition of virulence potential of Vibrio cholerae by natural compounds. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011;133:232-239.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Shu Y., Liu Y., Li L., Feng J., Lou B., Zhou X., Wu H. Antibacterial activity of quercetin on oral infectious pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011;5:5358-5361.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    David A.V.A., Arulmoli R., Parasuraman S. Overviews of Biological Importance of Quercetin: A Bioactive Flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016;10:84-89.

    Not in our library10.4103/0973-7847.194044

  11. 11.

    Oliveira V.M., Carraro E., Auler M.E., Khalil N.M. Quercetin and rutin as potential agents antifungal against Cryptococcus spp. Braz. J. Biol. 2016;76:1029-1034.

    Not in our library10.1590/1519-6984.07415

  12. 12.

    Hooda H., Singh P., Bajpai S. Effect of quercetin impregnated silver nanoparticle on growth of some clinical pathogens. Mater. Today Proc. 2020;31:625-630.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.530

  13. 13.

    Cushnie T.P.T., Lamb A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2005;26:343-356.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.002

  14. 14.

    Wang S., Yao J., Zhou B., Yang J., Chaudry M.T., Wang M., Xiao F., Li Y., Yin W. Bacteriostatic effect of quercetin as an antibiotic alternative in vivo and its antibacterial mechanism in vitro. J. Food Prot. 2018;81:68-78.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-17-214

  15. 15.

    Ahmad A., Kaleem M., Ahmed Z., Shafiq H. Therapeutic potential of flavonoids and their mechanism of action against microbial and viral infections—A review. Food Res. Int. 2015;77:221-235.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.021

  16. 16.

    Yang H., Li K., Yan H., Liu S., Wang Y., Huang C. High-performance therapeutic quercetin-doped adhesive for adhesive–dentin interfaces. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8189.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-08633-3

  17. 17.

    Martini N.D., Katerere D.R.P., Eloff J.N. Biological activity of five antibacterial flavonoids from Combretum erythrophyllum (Combretaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004;93:207-212.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.030

  18. 18.

    Li K., Xing S., Wang M., Peng Y., Dong Y., Li X. Anticomplement and antimicrobial activities of flavonoids from Entada phaseoloides. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012;7:867-871.

    Not in our library10.1177/1934578x1200700715

  19. 19.

    Montone A.M.I., Papaianni M., Malvano F., Capuano F., Capparelli R., Albanese D. Lactoferrin, quercetin, and hydroxyapatite act synergistically against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:9247.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms22179247

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Yin J., Peng X., Lin J., Zhang Y., Zhang J., Gao H., Tian X., Zhang R., Zhao G. Quercetin ameliorates Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis by inhibiting fungal growth, toll-like receptors and inflammatory cytokines. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021;93:107435.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107435

  22. 22.

    Abd-Allah W.E., Awad H.M., AbdelMohsen M.M. HPLC Analysis of Quercetin and Antimicrobial Activity of Comparative Methanol Extracts of Shinus molle L. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015;4:550-558.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Gao M., Wang H., Zhu L. Quercetin assists fluconazole to inhibit biofilm formations of fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans in in vitro and in vivo antifungal managements of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016;40:727-742.

    Not in our library10.1159/000453134

  24. 24.

    Singh B.N., Upreti D.K., Singh B.R., Pandey G., Verma S., Roy S., Naqvi A.H., Rawat A.K.S. Quercetin sensitizes fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans to induce apoptotic cell death by modulating quorum sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2153-2168.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.03599-14

  25. 25.

    Herrera C.L., Alvear M., Barrientos L., Montenegro G., Salazar L.A. The antifungal effect of six commercial extracts of Chilean propolis on Candida spp. Cien. Inv. Agric. 2010;37:75-84.

    Not in our library10.4067/s0718-16202010000100007

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Uchide N., Toyoda H. Antioxidant therapy as a potential approach to severe influenza-associated complications. Molecules. 2011;16:2032-2052.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules16032032

  28. 28.

    Dos Santos A.E., Kuster R.M., Yamamoto K.A., Salles T.S., Campos R., de Meneses M.D., Soares M.R., Ferreira D. Quercetin and quercetin 3-O-glycosides from Bauhinia longifolia (Bong.) Steud. show anti-Mayaro virus activity. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:130.

    Not in our library10.1186/1756-3305-7-130

  29. 29.

    Agrawal P.K., Agrawal C., Blunden G. Quercetin: Antiviral Significance and Possible COVID-19 Integrative Considerations. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020;15:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1177/1934578x20976293

  30. 30.

    Pierro F.D., Iqtadar S., Khan A., Mumtaz S.U., Chaudhry M.M., Bertuccioli A., Derosa G., Maffioli P., Togni S., Riva A., et al. Potential Clinical Benefits of Quercetin in the Early Stage of COVID-19: Results of a Second, Pilot, Randomized, Controlled and Open-Label Clinical Trial. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021;14:2807-2816.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijgm.s318949

  31. 31.

    Ishitsuka H., Ohsawa C., Ohiwa T., Umeda I., Suhara Y. Antipicornavirus flavone Ro 09-0179. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982;22:611-616.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.22.4.611

  32. 32.

    Zhao Y., Chen M., Zhao Z., Yu S. The antibiotic activity and mechanisms of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) bagasse extract against food-borne pathogens. Food Chem. 2015;185:112-118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.120

  33. 33.

    Yang X., Zhang W., Zhao Z., Li N., Mou Z., Sun D., Cai Y., Wang W., Lin Y. Quercetin loading CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles as efficient antibacterial and anticancer materials. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017;167:36-48.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.11.023

  34. 34.

    Siriwong S., Thumanu K., Hengpratom T., Eumkeb G. Synergy and mode of action of ceftazidime plus quercetin or luteolin on Streptococcus pyogenes. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015;2015:759459.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/759459

  35. 35.

    Pal A., Tripathi A. Quercetin potentiates meropenem activity among pathogenic carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019;127:1038-1047.

    Not in our library10.1111/jam.14388

  36. 36.

    Pal A., Tripathi A. Demonstration of bactericidal and synergistic activity of quercetin with meropenem among pathogenic carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Pathog. 2020;143:104120.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104120

  37. 37.

    Ohemeng K.A., Schwender C.F., Fu K.P., Barrett J.F. DNA gyrase inhibitory and antibacterial activity of some flavones (1). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993;3:225-230.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-894x(01)80881-7

  38. 38.

    Hossion A.M., Zamami Y., Kandahary R.K., Tsuchiya T., Ogawa W., Iwado A., Sasaki K. Quercetin diacylglycoside analogues showing dual inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV as novel antibacterial agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:3686-3703.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm200010x

  39. 39.

    Plaper A., Golob M., Hafner I., Oblak M., Solmajer T., Jerala R. Characterization of quercetin binding site on DNA gyrase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;306:530-536.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01006-4

  40. 40.

    Liu H.N., Liu Y., Hu L.L., Suo Y.L., Zhang L., Jin F., Feng X.A., Teng N., Li Y. Effects of dietary supplementation of quercetin on performance, egg quality, cecal microflora populations, and antioxidant status in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2014;93:347-353.

    Not in our library10.3382/ps.2013-03225

  41. 41.

    Raza A., Xu X., Xia L., Xia C., Tang J., Ouyang Z. Quercetin-Iron Complex: Synthesis, Characterization, Antioxidant, DNA Binding, DNA Cleavage, and Antibacterial Activity Studies. J. Fluoresc. 2016;26:2023-2031.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10895-016-1896-y

  42. 42.

    Lin E.S., Luo R.H., Huang C.Y. A Complexed Crystal Structure of a Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein with Quercetin and the Structural Basis of Flavonol Inhibition Specificity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:588.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms23020588

  43. 43.

    Qayyum S., Sharma D., Bisht D., Khan A.U. Identification of factors involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm under quercetin stress. Microb. Pathog. 2019;126:205-211.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.013

  44. 44.

    Júnior S.D.D.C., Santos J.V.D.O., Campos L.A.D.A., Pereira M.A., Magalhães N.S.S., Cavalcanti I.M.F. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of quercetin against clinical isolates of Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus with resistance profile. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotech. 2018;3:1948-1958.

    Not in our library10.22161/ijeab/3.5.50

  45. 45.

    Ouyang J., Sun F., Feng W., Sun Y., Qiu X., Xiong L., Liu Y., Chen Y. Quercetin is an effective inhibitor of quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;120:966-974.

    Not in our library10.1111/jam.13073

  46. 46.

    Manner S., Fallarero A. Screening of natural product derivatives identifies two structurally related flavonoids as potent quorum sensing inhibitors against gram-negative bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1346.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms19051346

  47. 47.

    Tran T.T., Hadinoto K. A Potential Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor for Bronchiectasis Therapy: Quercetin-Chitosan Nanoparticle Complex Exhibiting Superior Inhibition of Biofilm Formation and Swimming Motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the Native Quercetin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:1541.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms22041541

  48. 48.

    Zeng Y., Nikitkova A., Abdelsalam H., Li J., Xiao J. Activity of quercetin and kaempferol against Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019;98:9-16.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.11.005

  49. 49.

    Lee J.H., Park J.H., Cho H.S., Joo S.W., Cho M.H., Lee J. Anti-biofilm activities of quercetin and tannic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling. 2013;29:491-499.

    Not in our library10.1080/08927014.2013.788692

  50. 50.

    Vazquez-Armenta F.J., Bernal-Mercado A.T., Tapia-Rodriguez M.R., Gonzalez-Aguilar G.A., Lopez-Zavala A.A., Martinez-Tellez M.A., Hernandez-Oñate M.A., Ayala-Zavala J.F. Quercetin reduces adhesion and inhibits biofilm development by Listeria monocytogenes by reducing the amount of extracellular proteins. Food Control. 2018;90:266-273.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.041

  51. 51.

    Vazquez-Armenta F.J., Hernandez-Oñate M.A., Martinez-Tellez M.A., Lopez-Zavala A.A., Gonzalez-Aguilar G.A., Gutierrez-Pacheco M.M., Ayala-Zavala J.F. Quercetin repressed the stress response factor (sigB) and virulence genes (prfA, actA, inlA, and inlC), lower the adhesion, and biofilm development of L. monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 2020;87:103377.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2019.103377

  52. 52.

    Kim M.K., Lee T.G., Jung M., Park K.H., Chong Y. In Vitro Synergism and Anti-biofilm Activity of Quercetin-Pivaloxymethyl Conjugate against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus Species. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2018;66:1019-1022.

    Not in our library10.1248/cpb.c18-00380

  53. 53.

    Bordeleau E., Mazinani S., Nguyen D., Betancourt F., Yan H. Abrasive treatment of microtiter plates improves the reproducibility of bacterial biofilm assays. RSC Adv. 2018;8:32434-32439.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ra06352d

  54. 54.

    Vanaraj S., Keerthana B.B., Preethi K. Biosynthesis, Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Quercetin from Clitoria ternatea L to Enhance Toxicity against Bacterial Biofilm. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2017;27:1412-1422.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10904-017-0595-8

  55. 55.

    Vipin C., Mujeeburahiman M., Ashwini P., Arun A.B., Rekha P.D. Anti-biofilm and cytoprotective activities of quercetin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019;68:464-471.

    Not in our library10.1111/lam.13129

  56. 56.

    Wang J., Song M., Pan J., Shen X., Liu W., Zhang X., Li H., Deng X. Quercetin impairs Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm formation by inhibiting sortase A activity. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018;22:6228-6237.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.13910

  57. 57.

    Ouyang J., Feng W., Lai X., Chen Y., Zhang X., Rong L., Sun F., Chen Y. Quercetin inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation via the vfr-mediated lasIR system. Microb. Pathog. 2020;149:104291.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104291

  58. 58.

    Vikram A., Jayaprakasha G.K., Jesudhasan P.R., Pillai S.D., Patil B.S. Suppression of bacterial cell-cell signalling, biofilm formation and type III secretion system by citrus flavonoids. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;109:515-527.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04677.x

  59. 59.

    Mu Y., Zeng H., Chen W. Quercetin Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Decreasing the Production of EPS and Altering the Composition of EPS in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:631058.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2021.631058

  60. 60.

    Pruteanu M., Hernández Lobato J.I., Stach T., Hengge R. Common plant flavonoids prevent the assembly of amyloid curli fibres and can interfere with bacterial biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;22:5280-5299.

    Not in our library10.1111/1462-2920.15216

  61. 61.

    He Z., Zhang X., Song Z., Li L., Chang H., Li S., Zhou W. Quercetin inhibits virulence properties of Porphyromas gingivalis in periodontal disease. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:18313.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-74977-y

  62. 62.

    Quecan B.X.V., Santos J.T.C., Rivera M.L.C., Hassimotto N.M.A., Almeida F.A., Pinto U.M. Effect of Quercetin Rich Onion Extracts on Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:867.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2019.00867

  63. 63.

    Wang L., Li B., Si X., Liu X., Deng X., Niu X., Jin Y., Wang D., Wang J. Quercetin protects rats from catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus infections by inhibiting coagulase activity. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019;23:4808-4818.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.14371

  64. 64.

    Lv Q., Zhang P., Quan P., Cui M., Liu T., Yin Y., Chi G. Quercetin, a pneumolysin inhibitor, protects mice against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Microb. Pathog. 2020;140:103934.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103934

  65. 65.
  66. 66.

    Bitencourt T.A., Komoto T.T., Massaroto B.G., Miranda C.E.S., Beleboni R.O., Marins M., Fachin A.L. Trans-chalcone and quercetin down-regulate fatty acid synthase gene expression and reduce ergosterol content in the human pathogenic dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;13:229.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6882-13-229

  67. 67.

    Kwun M.S., Lee D.G. Quercetin-induced yeast apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction under the accumulation of magnesium in Candida albicans. Fungal Biol. 2020;124:83-90.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.funbio.2019.11.009

  68. 68.

    Cassetta A., Stojan J., Krastanova I., Kristan K., Brunskole Švegelj M., Lamba D., Lanišnik Rižner T. Structural basis for inhibition of 17 β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases by phytoestrogens: The case of fungal 17β-HSDcl. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017;171:80-93.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.020

  69. 69.

    da Silva C.R., de Andrade Neto J.B., de Sousa Campos R., Figueiredo N.S., Sampaio L.S., Magalhães H.I., Cavalcanti B.C., Gaspar D.M., de Andrade G.M., Lima I.S., et al. Synergistic effect of the flavonoid catechin, quercetin, or epigallocatechin gallate with fluconazole induces apoptosis in Candida tropicalis resistant to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:1468-1478.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.00651-13

  70. 70.

    Rocha M.F.G., Sales J.A., da Rocha M.G., Galdino L.M., de Aguiar L., Pereira-Neto W.A., de Aguiar Cordeiro R., Castelo-Branco D.S.C.M., Sidrim J.J.C., Brilhante R.S.N. Antifungal effects of the flavonoids kaempferol and quercetin: A possible alternative for the control of fungal biofilms. Biofouling. 2019;35:320-328.

    Not in our library10.1080/08927014.2019.1604948

  71. 71.

    Di Petrillo A., Orrù G., Fais A., Fantini M.C. Quercetin and its derivates as antiviral potentials: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res. 2022;36:266-278.

    Not in our library10.1002/ptr.7309

  72. 72.

    Kim H.J., Woo E.R., Shin C.G., Park H. A new flavonol glycoside gallate ester from Acer okamotoanum and its inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) integrase. J. Nat. Prod. 1998;61:145-148.

    Not in our library10.1021/np970171q

  73. 73.

    Kaul T.N., Middleton E., Ogra P.L. Antiviral effect of flavonoids on human viruses. J. Med. Virol. 1985;15:71-79.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.1890150110

  74. 74.

    Liu Z., Zhao J., Li W., Shen L., Huang S., Tang J., Duan J., Fang F., Huang Y., Chang H., et al. Computational screen and experimental validation of anti-influenza effects of quercetin and chlorogenic acid from traditional Chinese medicine. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:19095.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep19095

  75. 75.

    Liu Z., Zhao J., Li W., Wang X., Xu J., Xie J., Tao K., Shen L., Zhang R. Molecular docking of potential inhibitors for influenza H7N9. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015;2015:480764.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/480764

  76. 76.

    Fatima K., Mathew S., Suhail M., Ali A., Damanhouri G., Azhar E., Qadri I. Docking studies of Pakistani HCV NS3 helicase: A possible antiviral drug target. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106339.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0106339

  77. 77.

    Mathew S., Fatima K., Fatmi M.Q., Archunan G., Ilyas M., Begum N., Azhar E., Damanhouri G., Qadri I. Computational Docking Study of p7 Ion Channel from HCV Genotype 3 and Genotype 4 and Its Interaction with Natural Compounds. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126510.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0126510

  78. 78.

    Bachmetov L., Gal-Tanamy M., Shapira A., Vorobeychik M., Giterman-Galam T., Sathiyamoorthy P., Golan-Goldhirsh A., Benhar I., Tur-Kaspa R., Zemel R. Suppression of hepatitis C virus by the flavonoid quercetin is mediated by inhibition of NS3 protease activity. J. Viral Hepat. 2012;19:e81-e88.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01507.x

  79. 79.

    Rojas Á., del Campo J.A., Clement S., Lemasson M., García-Valdecasas M., Gil-Gómez A., Ranchal I., Bartosch B., Bautista J.D., Rosenberg A.R., et al. Effect of Quercetin on Hepatitis C Virus Life Cycle: From Viral to Host Targets. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31777.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep31777

  80. 80.

    Hung P.Y., Ho B.C., Lee S.Y., Chang S.Y., Kao C.L., Lee S.S., Lee C.N. Houttuynia cordata targets the beginning stage of herpes simplex virus infection. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0115475.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0115475

  81. 81.

    Cho W.K., Weeratunga P., Lee B.H., Park J.S., Kim C.J., Ma J.Y., Lee J.S. Epimedium koreanum Nakai displays broad spectrum of antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo by inducing cellular antiviral state. Viruses. 2015;7:352-377.

    Not in our library10.3390/v7010352

  82. 82.
  83. 83.

    Chaabi M. Antiviral Effects of Quercetin and Related Compounds. Naturopathic Currents, Special Edition, April 2020, Antiviral Effects of Quercetin and Related Compounds. 2020.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.
  85. 85.

    Alomair L., Almsned F., Ullah A., Jafri M.S. In Silico Prediction of the Phosphorylation of NS3 as an Essential Mechanism for Dengue Virus Replication and the Antiviral Activity of Quercetin. Biology. 2021;10:1067.

    Not in our library10.3390/biology10101067

  86. 86.

    Liu M., Yu Q., Xiao H., Li M., Huang Y., Zhang Q., Li P. The Inhibitory Activities and Antiviral Mechanism of Medicinal Plant Ingredient Quercetin Against Grouper Iridovirus Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:586331.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.586331

  87. 87.

    Salehi B., Machin L., Monzote L., Sharifi-Rad J., Ezzat S.M., Salem M.A., Merghany R.M., El Mahdy N.M., Kılıç C.S., Sytar O., et al. Therapeutic Potential of Quercetin: New Insights and Perspectives for Human Health. ACS Omega. 2020;5:11849-11872.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.0c01818

  88. 88.

    Graefe E.U., Wittig J., Mueller S., Riethling A.K., Uehleke B., Drewelow B., Pforte H., Jacobasch G., Derendorf H., Veit M. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of quercetin glycosides in humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001;41:492-499.

    Not in our library10.1177/00912700122010366

  89. 89.
  90. 90.

    Mukhopadhyay P., Prajapati A.K. Quercetin in anti-diabetic research and strategies for improved quercetin bioavailability using polymer-based carriers—A review. RSC Adv. 2015;5:97547-97562.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra18896b

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.