Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

New Developments in Medical Applications of Hybrid Hydrogels Containing Natural Polymers

Cornelia Vasile, Daniela Pamfil, Elena Stoleru and 1 more

Molecules · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/molecules25071539

Abstract

New trends in biomedical applications of the hybrid polymeric hydrogels, obtained by combining natural polymers with synthetic ones, have been reviewed. Homopolysaccharides, heteropolysaccharides, as well as polypeptides, proteins and nucleic acids, are presented from the point of view of their ability to form hydrogels with synthetic polymers, the preparation procedures for polymeric organic hybrid hydrogels, general physico-chemical properties and main biomedical applications (i.e., tissue engineering, wound dressing, drug delivery, etc.).

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Hydrogels can be classified by taking into consideration many factors, such as source; preparation methods; network structure (as permanent (chemically crosslinked or irreversible), and non-permanent (physically crosslinked or reversible, hydrogen-bonded hydrogels); dimensions (macrogels, microgels, nanogels); sensitivity to stimuli (such as physical, chemical, and biochemical stimuli); charge of polymer network (nonionic, ionic, zwitterion, and amphoteric); physical aspect (micro-/nanoparticle, film, matrix, gel, etc.); configuration (amorphous and semicrystalline); composition (homopolymeric, multipolymeric or heteropolymeric, copolymeric, and interpenetrating polymer networks, hybrids, composites); degradability (biodegradable, bioabsorbable, bioerodible, and degradable in a controlled manner) (Scheme 1).

Generally, hydrogels contain polar/charged functional groups which offer them hydrophilicity, water absorption capacity and, respectively, swelling in a certain medium, enhancement of their susceptibility to stimuli, etc.. They can also differentiate in respect with their equilibrium swelling grade (SWD) as those low SWD hydrogels (20–50%), medium SWD hydrogels (50–90%), high SWD hydrogels (90–99.5%), and superabsorbent hydrogels (>99.5%). The hydrogels with high SWD show good permeability and biocompatibility being preferred for use in the medical field.

Hybrid hydrogels definition is still debatable. They are defined either as a complex composed of hundreds of chemically or physically cross-linking nanogels, or it refers to systems combined with different polymers and/or with nanoparticles, such as plasmonic, magnetic, and carbonaceous nanoparticles, among others, or they are constituted by chemically, functionally, and morphologically distinct building blocks from at least two distinct classes of molecules, which can include biologically active polymers as polysaccharides and/or proteins, peptides, or nano/microstructures, interconnected via physical or chemical means. Depending on the size and the nature of the building blocks, the hybridization can occur at molecular level or at microscopic scale.

For the purpose of this review, we refer only to the organic polymeric hybrid hydrogels containing natural polymers (Figure 1), defined according to the last definition and their medical applications (in medicine/nanomedicine).

Each medical application involves the unique choice of a combination of the component materials, with the goal to match both desired structural and functional properties which must effectively produce an advanced polymeric system, with a new profile. One of the most relevant examples is the combination protein/other polymers. Such combinations can be resulted by polymerization or conjugation (click chemistry) with synthetic polymers resulting compatible hybrid hydrogels both in vitro and in vivo as it was demonstrated by cell differentiation, proliferation, migration studies and drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing applications, respectively or sequestration of growth factors from the surrounding medium. Commonly, the hybrid hydrogels are heterogeneous and this property is important to assure cell adhesion, organization, and cell–cell interactions required for medical applications.

1.1. Polymers Used in Hybrid Hydrogels

There are four main types of natural biodegradable polymers used in hybrid hydrogels described in this review—Table 1, including: (1) homopolysaccharides, as: cellulose and derivatives, pullulan, dextran, starch, etc.; (2) heteropolysaccharides from which can be mentioned: chitosan/chitin and their derivatives, dextran, agarose, alginic acid and alginates, hyaluronic acid (HA), chondroitin and derivative sulphates, heparin, pectin, etc. (3) polypeptides/proteins, such as gelatin, collagen, albumin, fibrin and fibrinogen, soy and whey proteins, silk, Matrigel™, etc., and genetically engineered proteins (calmodulin (a calcium-binding protein), elastin-like polypeptides, leucine zipper); (4) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). The protein/polysaccharide hybrid polymers like fibrin/cellulose, collagen/HA, gelatin/alginate and many others etc. were studied and other many combination make now topics of undergoing researches. Lignin was also used. Most of them are components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in vivo. Their composition (bovine fibrinogen, rat tail collagen, etc.) may vary with source and processing method, being difficult to control their microstructures, properties and reproducibility between experiments.

Synthetic polymers commonly used in the hybrid hydrogels preparation can be classified into three main types: non-biodegradable, biodegradable, and bioactive polymers. Most common synthetic polymers are: poly (lactic acid) (PLA), poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) and copolymers, poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) to produce biodegradable hydrogels. Hydrogels may include vinyl monomers like 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), N-isopropyl acrylamide (NIPAAm), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), acrylamide (AAm), acrylic acid (AAc) or macromers, methoxyl poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), monoacrylates (mPEGMA or PEGMA), and diacrylates (PEGDA), ethylene glycol diacrylate (EGDA), Pluronic® polymers, etc..

By combining the properties of synthetic and natural polymers to form hybrid hydrogels, a direct approach is created for bioactive hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Comparatively with natural polymers, the synthetic polymers are easily synthesized even at large scale by polymerization, cross-linking, and functionalization (modification by block structures, by blending, copolymerization), their molecular structure, molecular weight, physical and chemical properties (mechanical strength, biodegradability) are more reproducible, this aspect being critical for the medical applications mainly scaffolding. Unfortunately, applications of synthetic hydrogels as biomaterials are limited by their absence of bioactivity. The protein-polymer hybrid networks with complex abilities, including bioactivity, stimuli-responsiveness, catalytic activity, or ability to regulate cell behaviors have been/are created to overcome this limitation, maintaining good mechanical properties of materials.

1.1.1. Microgel

The term microgel describes a variety of particles that differ substantially in structure, physico-chemical properties, preparation and application and is interchangeably with terms such as nanogel, microsphere and macrogel depending on the numerous particle types falling within the broad sphere of nano-/microparticle shapes and sizes.

1.1.2. Hybrid Nanogels

Hybrid nanogels later developed are highly crosslinked nano-sized hydrogel systems with diameter less than 100 nm having a non-fluid colloidal/polymer network that combine the properties of both hydrogels and nanomaterials. The nanoscale provides a large surface area for bioconjugation, long time of circulation in blood, and the possibility of being actively or passively targeted to the desired site of action (e.g., tumor sites). Hybrid smart hydrogels/nanogels show the ability to respond to biomedically relevant changes like pH, temperature, ionic force/concentration, redox environment, light, glucose, magnetic field, electrical field, chemicals or specific biomarkers etc., by changing their volume, refractive index, and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity etc. Micro- and nano-sized hydrogels are faster in responding to changes in their environment than their macroscopic or bulk counterparts and can be used more efficiently in medical and sensor applications.

1.1.3. Multifunctional Hybrid Nanogels

Multifunctional hybrid nanogels found applications in medical field/nanomedicine for continuous monitoring by optical sensing to mentioned stimuli in complex samples such as blood and bioreactor fluids as well as for intracellular imaging, contributing to the explanation of intricate biological processes, the development of novel diagnoses and therapy toward clinical applications..

1.1.4. Hybrid Polymer Nanogel/Hydrogels

Hybrid polymer nanogel/hydrogels include interpenetrated networks (IPNs) and core-shell particles. The core-shell strategy is especially useful for targeting therapy, while the interpenetration allows the development of multiresponssive nanogels and the control of the drug release profile.

1.1.5. Physical Hydrogels

Physical hydrogels result by ionic and physical interactions, such as hydrogen bonds, coordination bonds, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in certain conditions and physico-chemical interactions (stereo-complexation, charge condensation, or supramolecular chemistry). By changing the temperature, pH, ionic strength or solvent composition, they form a homogeneous solution and re-gel when they return to their initial conditions, being reversible gels, generally unstable and mechanically weak. The physical cross-links are also formed by crystallization, between amphiphilic block and graft copolymers, and protein interactions. Physically crosslinked hydrogels show stimuli-responsiveness and self-healing properties, but their mechanical strength is low and they often exhibit plastic flow.

1.1.6. Chemically or Covalently Crosslinked Hydrogels

Chemically or covalently crosslinked hydrogels with a permanently fixed shape at rest, exhibit a low fracture toughness and extensibility. Therefore, it is preferred to create both physically and covalently crosslinking hydrogels, resulting doubly-crosslinked hybrid gels that combine all mentioned properties. Many double network (DN) hydrogels prepared by double chemically crosslinking or by hybrid physical/chemical crosslinking imply crosslinking agents, but they present toxicity which is an important disadvantage. Designing a new generation of DN gels comprising two non-covalent associated networks is a promising technique.

Kondo and coworkers prepared a dually-crosslinked polymer gel with a very homogeneous network architecture, using a tetra-arm star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), PEG and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) building blocks linked by orthogonal cross-coupling, The obtained network from hydrophilic and hydrophobic components regularly and uniformly distributed is non-covalent hydrophobic association whose strength is tuned by the molar ratio of the hydrophilic PEG and the hydrophobic PDMS segments.

1.1.7. Self-Assembling Hybrid Hydrogels

Self-assembling hybrid hydrogels containing peptides provide the desired biological functionality and biodegradability, are able to mimic biological structures and materials having direct biomedical applications, namely as carriers for drug and cell delivery (e.g., incorporation of bioactive sequences from natural proteins). To control mechanical, biocompatibility and degradation properties, the peptides are combined with polymeric networks by chemical modification, covalently linking or non-covalent interactions between peptides and polymers.

Hybrid hydrogels self-assembled from graft copolymers via formation of coiled coil antiparallel heterodimers was also demonstrated, based on HPMA copolymers backbone and a pair of oppositely charged peptide grafts. The formation of these hybrid hydrogels was reversible. A DNA/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) hybrid hydrogel (HDNA) was prepared for water-insoluble ophthalmic therapeutic delivery of dexamethasone and it may be applied in treatment of various eye diseases.

1.1.8. Interpenetrated and Semi-Interpenetrated Polymer Networks

To enhance the mechanical strength, the swelling/deswelling response, and to add new sensitivities to a nanogel, multicomponent networks as full IPNs and semi-IPNs (sIPNs) were prepared by simultaneous synthesis and sequential synthesis involving two or more polymers. The reaction can take place in the presence of a crosslinking agent, in order to form a complete IPN or in the absence of the crosslinking initiator, to form a sIPN.

1.1.9. Core-Shell Polymer Networks

The most common techniques of synthesis of core-shell nanogels are the seed precipitation polymerization, crosslinking of amphiphilic micelles preformed by self-assembly or the reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization (RAFT).

Several examples of hybrid polymeric hydrogel include: PEG-modified natural polymers, like fibrinogen, heparin (Hep), dextran, HA, and albumin;PNIPAAm-modified natural polymers, like collagen, chitosan, and alginate.

PEG-modified natural polymers, like fibrinogen, heparin (Hep), dextran, HA, and albumin;

PNIPAAm-modified natural polymers, like collagen, chitosan, and alginate.

1.1.10. Supramolecular Hydrogel

Supramolecular hydrogel are builded by blocks of peptides and polymers by the coupling/conjugation of specific peptide sequences (cell adhesive and/or enzymatically cleavable) to polymer chains. In such a way is obtained controlled cell responses (adhesion, migration, differentiation) because the components can self-assembly into hybrid hydrogels either, as peptide-polymer conjugates or combining individual components. These will determine the properties of the hydrogels (as stiffness, mesh structure, responsiveness, and biocompatibility), cooperative folding/unfolding transitions control over the structure formation at the nanometer level. The new produced materials may possess unprecedented levels of structural organization and novel properties. By optimizing the amino acid sequence, responsive hybrid hydrogels tailor-made for a specific application may be designed. Hybrid peptide/polymer molecular hydrogel design and synthesis showed significant research progress to mimic the natural proteins molecular architectures, dynamic responsiveness, and cellular functions, combined with tunability and processability provided by the synthetic polymer constituents.

2.1. Routes to Obtain Hybrid Hydrogels

Crosslinking techniques can be: (i) physical crosslinking (achieved by using repeated freezing/thawing cycles and led to cryogels) by ionic interaction, complex coacervation or H-bonding; (ii) chemical crosslinking or grafting by polymerization, co-polymerization, chemical conversion (using crosslinking agents such as borates, glyoxal, glutaraldehyde, etc.), and (iii) irradiation crosslinking or grafting (electron beam or gamma radiation, depending on irradiation dose). The properties of hydrogels can be controlled by different parameters, such as structures, by cross-linking type, end density, and synthesis of polymers, while in the case of physical hydrogels, by environment conditions (as pH, temperature, ionic strength etc.).

Chemically cross-linked gels are obtained by radical polymerization/crosslinking, emulsion, reverse microemulsion, inverse miniemulsion, heating, irradiation (ultraviolet, high-energy radiation, especially gamma and electron beams), photolithographic chemical reactions via crosslinker as di-sulfide crosslinking, ionic, click chemistry (such as azide-alkyne cyclo-addition reactions, thiol-ene couplings, Diels-Alder reactions and tetrazine-norbornene chemistry), Schiff base crosslinking with a huge ensemble of reactions, such as Michael type reaction, Michaelis-Arbuzov reaction, and nucleophile addition, and enzymatic cross-linking. Both chemical and physical cross-linking approaches are employed for hydrogels preparation.

A breakthrough toward the synthesis of complex structures with a high degree of functionality and compositional variety is the utilization as synthesis ways the controlled/living radical polymerization technique such as the catalytic atom (group) transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), degenerative chain transfer polymerization represented by iodine-mediated polymerization (RITP), and reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT). A new strategy of hybrid hydrogels synthesis entails the non-covalent attachment of genetically engineered coiled-coil protein motifs to hydrophilic synthetic HPMA copolymer backbone. The physical crosslinking was established by self-assembly of the coiled-coil domains.

2.1.1. Chemical Modifications

Chemical modifications involve a plenty of ligands which can be used for targeted drug delivery, stimulus responsive drug release or preparation of complex materials. The cross-linking of the hybrid network and conjugating proteins to the gel backbone as a platform for immobilizing functional proteins was reported by Lim et al..

2.1.2. Functionalization

Hybrid hydrogels/nanogels can also be surface functionalized with specific ligands to achieve targeted therapy and reduce toxicity. Functionalization is also important in order to create different types of macro/micro/nanogels morphologies, as hairy microgels, core-and-shell, hallow, multilayer microgels, etc.

2.1.3. Stealth Functionalization

Hybrid nanosystems/nanogels for drug delivery and biomedical purposes need a non-secondary requirement, as their biocompatibility necessary both to reduce the inflammatory or the immune response of the organism, and to improve blood circulation lifetime, biodistribution, and bioavailability of the carried drugs and also to overcome the self-defense mechanisms present in the bloodstream of the host organism. To achieve this requirement the hybrid nanogels must be specifically designed. A very wide variety of architectures result by their decoration, modification, and functionalization,, or they can be modified by conjugation with both organic and inorganic types of nanoparticles and nanostructures. The morphologies of hybrid nanogels vary both with the particle type and the assembly technique, each component being either core or shell, of different size and architecture. These variable morphologies may be obtained by chemical reactions or through physical crosslinking based on hydrogen bonds, ionic interactions, and other intermolecular bonds. Therefore, a proper surface decoration and its biocompatibility, is a parameter capable of strongly influencing the biodistribution together with the dimensions, the surface charge and the ligands interaction. Many stealth functionalizations exploit hydrophilic polymeric chains, as polyethylene glycols or chitosan.

2.1.4. PEGylation

PEGylation is a solution to increase the bioavailability of the decorated nanostructures and to extend the circulating lifetime. After this modification a protein corona is formed around the antifouling PEG functionalization. It will create a hindered zone around the nanoparticles and reduces the wrapping by plasma proteins and the subsequent uptake by macrophages PEGylation depends on many factors such as hydrophilicity of the PEG chains, molecular weight (MW) which vary from 2000 to 13,000 Da.

2.2. Processing Methods

Processing methods include: solution casting/drying, theta gelation, freezing or freezing/pressurizing, freeze drying, emulsion freeze drying, inverse microemulsion polymerization technique, solution blowing, electrospinning, coagulation treatment, CO2-in-water emulsion, sol-gel method/thermal annealing, CO2 bubbles template freeze drying, high hydrostatic pressure [HHP] method, supercritical gel-drying. Other new synthesis methods include the implementation of click chemistry reactions, photo-patterning, and rapid prototyping, 3D printing for the facile production of hybrid hydrogels, self-assembly, the use of biological molecules and motifs to promote a desired cellular outcome, and the tailoring of kinetics and transport behavior to obtain desired biomedical outcomes. 3D bioprinting of hydrogels is performed in accordance with the native tissue architecture therefore it is expected to result in a new generation of engineered tissues. Bakarich et al. fabricated by a new 3D-printing approach an interesting material with good mechanical performance based on κ-carrageenan and poly(oxyalkylene amine) (Jeffamine) based ionic-covalent entanglement hydrogels. The carrageenan induced a fast gelation, a structural integrity to the hydrogel system and thermoresponsiveness, while the epoxy-amine reaction to form covalent bonding takes place an ambient temperature for covalent bond formation.

Hydrogels and their products can be obtained in a wide range of shapes as temporary or permanent shape, shape memory, smart shape memory, quadruple-shape, sponges, soft or rigid, stretchable, films, sheets, bilayer, micro/nanoparticles with defined shapes, ultrathin microcapsules, matrix, scaffolds, hollow cube, hemisphere, pyramid, cylindrical, twisted bundle, patches for wound dressing, artificial ear, nose, and many others.

3. Properties

The specific physico-chemical key properties of the hybrid hydrogels are: remarkable thermodynamic stability, elevated capacity of solubilization, mildness, density, swelling/deswelling, high-water content and permeability, low surface tension and relative low viscosity, stiffness, mesh structure and size, responsiveness, biocompatibility and biodegradability (so avoiding its accumulation in the organs), non-immunologic response and capability of undergoing vigorous sterilization techniques, as well as their tunable viscoelasticity and structural similarity to the ECM. Their properties can be fine-tuned through selection of the hydrogel components (chemical composition), hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity ratio, and cross-linking strategy, crosslinking density etc. Hydrogels are commonly considered as highly biocompatible, owing to the high-water content and also to the physico-chemical similarity with the native ECM. Chemically cross-linked synthetic polymeric hydrogels have higher mechanical properties compared to self-assembling (physically crosslinked) systems, thanks to the high molecular weight of polymer materials, but they lack biological functionality, while self-assembling hydrogels, formed through physical cross-links, allow minimally invasive implantation in the body.

3.1. Swelling

The swelling of hydrogels is a process occurring in three steps, namely: (a) diffusion of water molecules into hydrogel network, (b) hydration of polymeric chains and their relaxation and (c) expansion of crosslinked polymeric network. The primary and secondary bound water is uptaken by the network by its interaction with the polar and hydrophobic sites, respectively and then the network is imbibed with additional water which is named free water. Finally at an infinite dilution to a maximum, level equilibrium water content is reached. The determination of swelling behavior is the main assay to establish the hydrogel quality, as it is also a means to evaluate other properties as: crosslinking degree, mechanical properties, degradation rate, etc. Swelling properties of the stimuli responsive hydrogels are significantly changed by the modification in parameters of the surrounding environment (i.e., temperature, pressure, pH, solvent composition, ionic strength, electrical potential, etc.). The polymeric hybrid hydrogels exhibit biodegradability and biocompatibility, high permeability, to oxygen, nutrients, and to water-soluble metabolites, being promising carriers and for cells encapsulation. They resemble with natural soft tissues being very useful in regenerative medicine, for tissue scaffold or therapeutic transfer systems, promoting cell attachment and proliferation.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties can be varied and tuned by changing the crosslinking degree, or lowered by heating. To seed osteoblast cells, it is necessary a more stiff material than in the case of adipocyte culture, as for this is also requirement for the development of a heterogeneous prosthetic device, as substitute for the intervertebral disc. The elastic nature of hydrated gels has been found to minimize irritation to the surrounding tissues after implantation.

3.3. Responsiveness

Generally, hydrogels have weak mechanical properties and a slow or delayed response to external stimuli. Novel hydrogel designs substantially enhanced mechanical properties and by creating the superporous and comb-type grafted hydrogels fast responses to external stimuli were obtained as also was done by development of self-assembling hydrogels from hybrid graft copolymers with property-controlling protein domains, and genetically engineered triblock copolymers containing hydrogels.

The low interfacial tension between the gel surface and body fluid minimizes protein adsorption and cell adhesion, reducing the chances of negative immune reactions.

3.4. Porosity and Permeation

The average pore size, the pore size distribution, and the pore interconnections included together in the parameter called « tortuosity » are important factors for a hydrogel matrix. They are influenced by the composition and the crosslink density of the hydrogel polymer network. Pores can show different morphologies: they can be closed, open as a blind end or interconnected, again divided in cavities and throats.

Net charge of the polyelectrolyte hydrogel is determined by the initial concentration of the cationic and/or anionic monomer.

Crosslinking influences all the other properties of the hydrogels. By controlling the crosslinking degree, the materials with tunable and optimized properties destined to different applications can be obtained.

The micro-/nanogels are valuable materials as drug-delivery carriers because they show high loading capacity, good stability, and reversible volume change in response to environmental stimuli (such as pH, temperature, and glucose level).

4. Applications

Hydrogels remain the most appealing candidates for tissue engineering scaffolds. The development of hybrid hydrogels constituted from different polymers is based on numerous resources and they are applied for regenerative medicine, tissue engineering (including: bone regeneration, cartilage tissue, vascular tissue, cardiac tissue, cardiovascular tissue, meniscus tissue, human prostate tissue, skin tissue/wound, and other tissues), wound healing, artificial cornea, drug/gene delivery, cancer cells, nucleus pulposus bioelectronic interfaces due to their structural similarity to the natural ECM, inherent biocompatibility, tunable viscoelasticity, tunable physical and mechanical properties, and their ability to form scaffolds for different tissues, high-water content and high permeability for oxygen and essential nutrients. Biomedical applications of hydrogels as the first materials developed for uses inside the patient started from the decade of 70 s.

It is considered that the development of the hydrogels for medical applications known three steps. The first generation of hydrogels is characterized by various crosslinking procedures involving the chemical modifications of a monomer or polymer with an initiator to develop materials with high swelling and good mechanical properties. The second generation of materials is that capable to respond to specific stimuli (temperature, pH, ionic strength, different external fields or concentration of specific bioactive molecules etc.), known as smart hydrogels. Finally, the research for the third generation of hydrogels was focused on the investigation and development of hybrid, stereo complexed materials (e.g., PEG-PLA interaction) with a wide spectrum of tunable properties and trigger stimuli. This last stage aimed to develop the so called “smart hydrogels” with a variety of possible applications. Hybrid hydrogels based on both natural and synthetic polymers offer infinite possibility to cells encapsulation, as matrices for repairing and regenerating a wide variety of tissues and organs, are capable of responding to biological signals in vivo or remote triggers and other many possible applications in biomaterials, biomedicine and nanomedicine.

Other important applications are (Scheme 2): wound dressing/healing, treatment of severe burns, drug delivery/controlled release, injectable hydrogels, vaccines, cancer treatment, autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative disease, anti-inflammatory, ophthalmology, etc.

Particularized examples of medical applications of hybrid hydrogels are described in the following sections.

5.1. Ability of Homopolysaccharides to Form Hybrid Hydrogels

Homopolysaccharides (HP) are subdivided into straight chain and branched chain ones, into plant polysaccharides, animal polysaccharides, microbial/bacterial polysaccharides, and seaweed polysaccharides.

Most homopolysaccharides can form hydrogels due to their intrinsic properties and the gel formation is generally driven by physical interactions. Amongst the plant-derived homopolysaccharides, cellulose and its derivatives possess plentiful hydrophilic functional groups (such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and aldehyde groups) in the backbone that can be used to prepare hydrogels. Starch is the most abundant storage polysaccharide in plants and includes two main structural components, namely amylose and amylopectin. The synthesis of starch hydrogels is determined by important features such as gelatinization and retrogradation, which are in turn affected by amylose and amylopectin ratio. The hydrogels obtained from native starch, pure starch components and their derivatives are hydrophilic and of great significance in the biomedical domain because of their good swelling capacity in water, biocompatibility and biodegradability. Carrageenan (CG) family of polysaccharides are soluble in hot water (>60 °C) and forms thermoreversible gels in a process that is dependent on temperature (when dropped down to 30 °C–40 °C gelation occurs) and the type of ions. Due to the structural resemblance to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (that is a component of natural extracellular matrix—ECM) and its fine physical functional properties, CG is extensively used in biomedical applications. Formation of gellan gum (GG) (a linear anionic exopolysaccharide) –based hydrogels takes place in the presence of mono-, di- and trivalent cations and depends on the temperature.

5.2. Biomedical Applications of Homopolysaccharides-Based Hydrogels

Homopolysaccharides native or modified with the various conjugates have been extensively used to develop organic hybrid hydrogels, for combating last-ditch biomedical challenges. In Table 2 are listed the several examples of components in homopolyssaccharide-based organic hybrid hydrogels, their synthesis pathways and medical applications.

5.2.1. Tissue Engineering

Multicomponent hydrogels based on PHEMA matrix and BC nanofibers were successfully prepared by in situ UV radical polymerization of HEMA monomer impregnated into wet BC nanofibrous structure. Biocompatibility tests demonstrated that BC-PHEMA hydrogels are non-toxic providing a favorable environment for proliferation of marrow stem cells isolated from rabbits (rMSCs)—Figure 2. Therefore, the obtained hydrogels can be seen as promising for application in the tissue engineering area, particularly in tissue replacement and wound healing.

PAAm/cellulose nanofibers (CNF) DN gels were synthesized by simply using an alkali treatment (15 wt % NaOH) at room temperature. Investigating the morphology of this DN gel it was noticed that the CNF network was embedded in the PAAm matrix, in this manner improving the strength of these hybrid gels. The obtained PAAm/CNF DN gels present notably improved mechanical properties that are proper for application as biomedical load-bearing gel materials. Hydrogels based on PVA blended with cellulose (PVA-Cel) were obtained through FT cycles and were evaluated in terms of appropriateness as a part of a structure simulating the length scale dependence of human skin. CMC-PEO hydrogels and porous gel films, with excellent biocompatibility, were prepared by mixing CMC-acrylate and PEO-hexa-thiols, as precursor solutions. The porous gel films were obtained by using ammonium bicarbonate particles as porogens, prior added in the precursor solutions. The obtained hydrogels and gel films show significant potential for tissue engineering applications. Hashimoto et al. has fabricated an amphiphilic crosslinked porous nanogel (NanoCliP), which self assembles, and presents the ability to embedded proteins, liposomes, and cells. This NanoCliP gel was synthetized using Michael reaction, by addition of a self-assembled nanogel of acryloyl group-modified cholesterol-bearing pullulan to pentaerythritol tetra (mercaptoethyl) polyoxyethylene, followed by freezing-induced phase separation. The in vivo tests show that the NanoCliP gel brings suitable features as a scaffold for tissue engineering, demonstrating improved cell infiltration, tissue ingrowth and neovascularization as observed from Figure 3.

Zhang et al. fabricated PVA-i-CG based organic hybrid hydrogels, via a facile FT technique, as tissue engineering scaffolds. The hydrogels demonstrated increased pore structure stability, enhanced attachment and proliferation of ATDC5 cells, good hemocompatibility, and low adverse effects. Li et al. has prepared a DN hydrogel GG/PEGDA by combining GG with PEGDA. The effects of viscoelasticity of GG/PEGDA DN hydrogel on the biological behavior of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were explored in vitro and in vivo. GG/PEGDA DN hydrogel shows excellent mechanical and relaxation properties which provide a favorable physical environment for cell proliferation and spreading, and induce chondrogenic differentiation. In another study was developed a DN hydrogel based on a GG gel and a poloxamer-Hep (PoH) network (PoH/GG DNH) to overcome the drawbacks of each gel network and to enhance the microenvironment for cell delivery. The DNH system was tested on bone marrow stem cells isolated from rabbits (rBMSCs) revealing that supported cell survival, maintained cell’s morphology and phenotype. The in vivo results have demonstrated that PoH/GG DNH endorse the cell distribution, adherence, and ECM production.

5.2.2. Wound Dressing

Gamma irradiated PVP/κ-CG based hydrogel obtained by gamma irradiation was intensively studied and applied as a biomaterial for wound dressing. This system presents several advantages such as a single step simultaneous sterilization and hydrogel formation, without the need of using initiator or crosslinker. To enhance the poor mechanical strength of γ-irradiated PVA/PVP/κ-CG hydrogel, silk was added as a reinforcement agent. PVP/κ-CG/PEG hydrogel dressing presents a long shelf life, have a high tensile strength, thus assuring an easy removal because it maintain its physical integrity. The advantages mentioned above make these systems to present increased patient compliance and are more effective than the commercially available ones. PEG/GG hydrogel showed superior biocompatibility (N 90%), cell adhesion and improved cell growth compared to simple gellan gum hydrogel. In addition, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to confirm RPE-specific gene expression, and the result showed that it was positively influenced. As a result, it was observed that PEG/GG hydrogel promotes retinal regeneration compared to that of pure GG.

5.2.3. Drug Delivery

Superabsorbent polymer compositions (SAPCs) based on poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide-co-22-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid)-grafted nanocellulose /poly(vinyl alcohol)-P(AA-co-AAm-co-AMPS)-g-NC/PVA, were obtained using graft copolymerization reaction, to create a system for amoxicillin drug delivery. The SAPCs drug delivery vehicle obtained was intended to apply for the treatment of peptic and duodenal ulcers induced by Helicobacter pylori. Smart (thermo- and pH-responsive) microgel particles based on HPC-AAc and poly(l-glutamic acid-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) were synthetized by emulsion polymerization. The microgel was tested for controlled delivery of insulin, being noted that the system is resistant to gastric pH (1.2) and release insulin in a controlled manner at intestinal pH (6.8). By NIPAAm/CMC copolymerization were obtained copolymeric (CP) sIPN hydrogels, which were redox crosslinked using N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide (BIS) and N,N′-bis(acryloyl)cystamine (CBA). The hydrogels were tested for egg white protein lysozyme delivery at pH 1.2 while the system cross-linked with BIS showed higher swelling and maximum release. A hydrogel system based on CMC and CMPVA grafted copolymer was developed by crosslinking with adipic dihydrazide. This copolymeric hybrid hydrogel was proposed as a carrier for drug delivery and as a scaffold for tissue engineering, based on its biocompatibility with the living cells and the fact that ensures outstanding survival rate at lower polymer concentration. Hydrogels based on bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) that are stimuli-responsive were fabricated using electron beam irradiation and evaluated as oral delivery system for proteins (e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA)). This method offers the advantage that no cross-linking agents are involved, thus overcoming the eventual toxic effects related to cross-linkers use. Pandey et al. using microwaves irradiation has developed hydrogels based on solubilized BC/AAm as a drug delivery system for theophylline. Different sets of BC-g-poly(acrylic acid-coacrylamide) hydrogels were obtained through microwave-assisted graft copolymerization using NaOH/urea as solvent system. These series of hydrogels have demonstrated a pH-sensitivity, which had influence on in vitro drug release profile, namely lower level of release in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) than in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF). This behavior indicates that the hydrogels may be efficient as a potential oral, controlled-release drug delivery system for the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Another hydrogel based on BC-g-PAA was prepared by electron beam irradiation technique. BSA was loaded into the BC-g-PAA hydrogel and showed low release in acidic SGF and higher penetration across the intestinal mucosa. The in vivo tests revealed that the hydrogel is biocompatible and non-toxic. Ceresh et al. obtained copolymeric hydrogels by graft-copolymerization of acrylic acid on three types of starch (potato, corn and rice starches) via 60Co-gamma irradiation. The starch-based hydrogels presented potential as prolonged drug (e.g., sodium salicylate and theophylline) delivery vehicles; in Figure 4 being illustrated the rate of release of theophylline from copolymeric hydrogels.

CMC functionalized with thiol groups (obtained by reaction with cysteamine in presence of 1-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)) was cross-linked, using dithiothreitol, with norbornene immobilized tetra-arm PEG (PEG-Nor) forming CMC-PEG hydrogels. The presence of thiol-bearing CMC into hydrogel structure determined pH sensitivity of the gels, demonstrating improved swelling and faster release of loaded BSA protein at basic pH. Moreover, thermo-responsive CMC-Nor hydrogels was developed by its crosslinking with a dithiol end functionalized PNIPAAm, determining temperature-induced shrinkage of the gel, at temperatures above the lower critical phase transition temperature (LCST) (around 32 °C).

Bajpai and Saxena performed potassium persulfate (KPS)-initiated graft copolymerization of AAc onto soluble starch in the presence of N,N′-methylene bisacrylamide (MBA) as the cross-linker. The hydrogels obtained were pH-sensitive and enzymatically degradable, exhibiting minimum swelling in an acidic pH and extensive swelling at pH 7.4 (i.e., simulating intestinal fluid). The behavior at acidic pH is determined by the formation of a complex hydrogen-bonded structure and at intestinal pH enzymatic degradation occurred along with the swelling controlled by chain-relaxation, being suitable for colon targeted drug delivery. Saboktakin et al. have obtained pH-sensitive starch hydrogels by free radical graft copolymerization of PMAA onto CMS, using bisacrylamide as a crosslinking agent (CA) and persulfate as an initiator. The pH-responsive behavior of CMS-g-PMAA hydrogels is characterized by a transition between the swollen and the collapsed states that occurs at high and low pH. The CMS-based hydrogels were tested for drug delivery. Double hydrophilic thermo-responsive pullulan-g-PNIPAAm copolymers with two different molecular weights of thermosensitive grafts were synthesized and used for preparation of indomethacin-loaded nanoparticles by dialysis and nanoprecipitation method. The sustained-release properties of poloxamer 407-based in situ gel were enhanced by the combination with CG, and present high potential to be used in vaginal in situ gel drug delivery systems with prolonged local residence and therefore for better clinical outcome. Hamcerencu et al. performed free radical grafting/polymerization of unsaturated esters (gellan maleate) with NIPAAm, using N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide as cross-linker, to design thermosensitive hydrogels. These hybrid hydrogels were tested for their swellability, in vitro loading and release of different drugs (e.g., adrenaline and chloramphenicol) and in vivo biocompatibility. By in vivo evaluation was not observed necrosis, calcification and acute inflammation, only the formation of a thin fibrous capsule around the implanted hydrogels, thus they being preliminary proposed for ophthalmic applications.

5.2.4. Other Biomedical Applications

The BC/PGA hydrogels were prepared by 60Co γ-irradiation crosslinking method. The BC nanofibers and PGA can form the multicomponent hydrogels with double crosslinking structure via γ-irradiation. The addition of BC increases compressive strength, storage modulus (G’) and the gel fraction but decreases the equilibrium swelling ratio of the BC/PGA composite hydrogels. The compressive strength and storage modulus of hydrogels increase 5 times and 10 times respectively at the irradiation dose of 50 kGy. Moreover, the BC/PGA hydrogels are non-toxic, indicating their safety for biomedical application. By UV photo-crosslinking were obtained temperature sensitive hydrogels based on hemicellulose (Hce) obtained from acetic acid pulping of Eucalyptus and NIPAAm. The protocol involved two steps; firstly, a Hce derivative was synthetized by grafting MA to Hce that contains vinyl bonds within the side chains followed by UV photocrosslinking of Hce-MA with NIPAAm in LiCl/DMF solvent. The equilibrium swelling ratio and morphology of the hydrogels were dependent on environment temperature, implying their potential as smart materials for medical application. All-trans retinoic acid aqueous gels composed of ι-CG and polyethylene oxide were proposed to be applied as a topical treatment of skin. In these gels, the PEO was selected for its high mucoadhesion property and spinnability, while ι-CG was chosed for its texture modification property and gelling feature. Combination of these components maximizes the optima properties of each entity by reducing the drawbacks of each individual polymer.

Deng et al. developed a novel κ-CG/PAAm (KC/PAAm) DN hydrogel through a dual physical-crosslinking strategy, with the ductile, hydrophobically associated PAAm being the first network, and the rigid potassium ion (K+) cross-linked KC being the second network. The DN (DPC-DN) hydrogels with optimized KC concentration exhibit excellent fracture tensile stress and toughness, comparable to those fully chemically linked DN hydrogels and physically-chemically cross-linked hybrid DN hydrogels. Additionally, DPC-DN demonstrated rapid self-recovery, remarkable notch-insensitivity, self-healing capability, as well as excellent cytocompatibility towards stem cells. In a similar manner were obtained hybrid hydrogels based on Iota-Carrageenan and polyacrylamide to be used as matrix for silver nanoparticles designed for bacterial inactivation applications.

6.1. Ability of Heteropolysaccharides to Form Hybrid Hydrogels

A biocompatible and biodegradable heteropolysaccharide that forms hydrogels by mixing with multivalent cations is the alginic acid. Spherical core–shell gel-bead structures (or worms) were obtained by combining alginic acid with 1,3,2,4-di-(4-acylhydrazide)-benzylidenesorbitol (DBS-CONHNH2). The gels based on alginic acid proved to have important applications in domains like drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Microspheres (MS) of hybrid hydrogels that can adjust their mechanical properties and durability in function of the biological environment were obtained using SA with heterotelechelic PEG derivatives. These hydrogels are appropriate for cell transplantation applications.

For enhancing the ability of liquid uptake and the mechanical properties of the hydrogels based on chitosan (CS), this natural polymer was associated with synthetic polymers or grafted with vinyl monomers, such as acrylic acid and acrylamide.

Chen et al. prepared macroporous PVA/CS hydrogel sponges that showed higher antimicrobial and haemostatic activity than pure CS sponges.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is abundant in connective, epithelial, and neural tissues. HA macromolecules showed anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive properties and block angiogenesis, while cleaved small fragments induce opposite behavior, enabling endothelial cells migration and angiogenesis. Kim et al. obtained PVA/HA hydrogel nanofibers by chemical crosslinking, using HCl and glutaraldehyde. They observed that the swelling ratio of these hydrogels is higher in respect with that corresponding to pure PVA hydrogel. A good biocompatibility of PVA/HA hydrogel nanofibers was evidenced by a higher cell adhesion at their surfaces, independent on the HA presence.

Heparin (Hep) has a high negative charge, the 3-D hydrogels based on it being used in tissue engineering, implantation, biosensor domain, drug delivery. Because Hep poses some safety problems (because it is often obtained from animal sources), analogous Hep-mimicking polymers and hydrogels obtained from synthetic sources were proposed.

The use of Hep in hydrogels by delivery growth-factors generates proliferation signals to cells because of its protein polysaccharide interactions closely mimicking the native structure and functioning of ECM.

Supramolecular hybrid hydrogels self-assembled were obtained from low-molecular-weight gelator (LMWG, which are small organic molecules which self-assemble in water or organic solvents, forming a 3D network that entraps the liquid phase resulting in gel formation) building blocks with the polymer gelator (PG) (e.g., calcium alginate). This type of hydrogel can be used in regenerative medicine, in controlled drug delivery, or in electronics devices as patterned conducting gels where they contact interface with living media. The components usually used for obtaining self-assembled multi-component hybrid hydrogels are: a pH activated LMWG, a temperature activated PG, an anionic biopolymer (such as Hep) and a cationic system capable of binding Hep.

6.2. Biomedical Applications of Heteropolysaccharides-Based Hybrid Hydrogels

Some examples of heteropolysaccharide-based hybrid hydrogels used in different biomedical domains are listed in the Table 3 where are also mentioned preparation methods and general properties.

6.2.1. Tissue Engineering

Generally, the scaffolds used in tissue engineering should have several properties, such as biocompatibility, cell proliferation, controlled swelling, ease of administration, antimicrobial, stability, porosity, adhesion, low immunogenicity, colonization of host cells without inducing any histological changes, integration with host tissues, biodegradability, bio mineralization, non-toxic degradation products, and also degradation of scaffolds should be inversely proportional to the rate of synthesis of the newly regenerated tissue.

Pok et al. obtained 3D scaffolds of self-assembled PCL in a gelatin-CS hydrogel, for possible application in congenital heart defects. They observed similarities between the mechanical properties of the hydrogel with those of the native tissue, as well as migration of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs). Zhao et al. synthesized hydrogel scaffolds by chemical crosslinking between quaternized CS and polyaniline, using oxidized dextran as cross-linker. The obtained hydrogels presented decreased cytotoxicity, higher antibacterial activity, and enhanced proliferation of C2C12 myoblast cells when compared with quaternized CS hydrogel. These hydrogels could be used for muscle, nerve, and cardiovascular repair. PVA hydrogel was loaded on one side only with Hep for possible application in vascular tissue engineering, because release of Hep from PVA/Hep hydrogel can prevent clot formation.

HA-based hydrogels are often used in cartilage tissue engineering, because HA has an inhibitory effect on fibronectin fragment-mediated chondrocytic chondrolysis, inhibitory effects on prostaglandin synthesis, proteoglycan release, and degradation by enzymes and free radicals. One of the main disadvantages of using HA in cartilage tissue engineering is its poor mechanical properties. That is why, this natural polymer has to be used together with various synthetic polymers, such as PNIPAAm and PEG.

Fan et al. evaluated the potential of hybrid poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-gelatin/chondroitin/hyaluronate (PLGA-GCH) scaffolds in cartilage repair. It was observed that differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seeded on PLGA-GCH significantly increased the proliferation of MSCs and GAG synthesis compared with PLGA scaffolds.

Bichara et al. developed a flexible PVA/SA hydrogel, using human nasal septum chondrocyte cells; the systems have been implanted into the subcutaneous environment of nude mice. In vivo tests showed deposition of collagen type II in the hydrogels, behavior that recommend this hydrogel type for reconstruction of craniofacial cartilage.

Kunisch et al. prepared star PEG/Hep hydrogels trying to prevent mineralization of the upper cartilage zone, for inhibiting long-term progression of calcified cartilage into bone.

A thermo-sensitive copolymer hydrogel was obtained by grafting PNIPAAm onto HA. This system passed from a liquid-like behavior to an elastic gel-similar one, at 30 °C, this fact being useful for cell encapsulation in the hydrogel. Another thermo-sensitive hydrogel was prepared using Pluronic and HA, this one being a potential candidate for applications as artificial vitreous substitute.

Self-healing hydrogels can be successfully used in drug/cell delivery or in 3D printing. Self-healing hydrogels based on glycol chitosan and difunctionalized PEG (GC-DP) were also used for tissue repairs, in central nervous system, or for inducing blood capillary formation. In order to achieve this second purpose, a multicomponent hybrid hydrogel was obtained using an IPN of GC-DP and fibrin. The hydrogel induced vascular endothelial cells to form capillary-like structures; injection of this hydrogel promoted angiogenesis in zebrafish and rescued the blood circulation in ischemic hindlimbs of mice.

Fares et al. prepared IPN and sIPN hydrogels, using a pectin grafted polycaprolactone (pectin-g-PCL) and a gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) component. The IPN hydrogels were characterized by cytocompatibility and, in the meantime, induced the growth of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts in vitro, proving that they are appropriate for different applications in tissue engineering.

A pectin-Fe3+/polyacrylamide hybrid DN hydrogel was developed by Niu et al.. These hybrid DN hydrogels were characterized by very good mechanical properties (such as stiffness, fatigue resistance, notch-insensitivity), as well as a high-water absorption ability (85%). All these characteristics recommend this hydrogel type to be used in the load-bearing tissue repair field.

Injectable scaffolds are superior to preformed scaffolds in terms of improved patient’s compliance, ease of clinical implementation for the treatment of geometrically complex, and large lesions via minimally invasive techniques, such as arthroscopy. This type of scaffolds can be used in minimally invasive surgical procedures; they completely fill the defect area and have good permeability, being hence promising biomaterials. The technique can be effectively applied to deliver a wide range of bioactive agents, such as drugs, proteins, growth factors, and even living cells. For the development of such type of scaffolds, natural polymers were used (i.e., collagen, chitosan, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronan, chondroitin sulfate, pectin). In order to obtain in situ gelling systems, different techniques can be applied, such as photo-crosslinking, chemical crosslinking, enzymatic crosslinking, pH-induced gelation, temperature-induced gelation, ionic and hydrophobic interactions.

6.2.2. Wound Dressing

Due to its properties, CS proved to be an attractive candidate for treating wounds, even major burns.

PVA/HA membrane hydrogels were tested for wound dressing application, from the point of view of their biological properties and biocompatibility. Increasing the HA content in the hybrid hydrogels, a decreased migration and cell viability were observed, due to an increase in the viscosity of the PVA/HA system. In the absence of ampicillin, the obtained membrane hydrogels were active against Candida albicans, while when ampicillin was added, they proved to be effective also against Staphylococcus aureus, but not against Escherichia coli. HA/PVPA/CS hydrogel designed for being used for skin wound healing showed antimicrobial activity against E. coli.

6.2.3. Drug Delivery

Hydrogels represent a drug delivery system class that has excelled as smart drug delivery. Biocompatible, biodegradable hydrogels have been designed using natural polymers that are susceptible to enzymatic degradation, or using synthetic polymers that possess hydrolysable moieties. CS positive features e.g., hydrophilicity, functional amino groups, and a net cationic charge recommend its hydrogels for the intelligent drug delivery and of macromolecular compounds, such as peptides, proteins, antigens, oligonucleotides, and genes.

Wu et al. developed hydrogel-based N-[(2-hydroxy-3-trimethylammonium) propyl] chitosan chloride (HTCC) and PEG for insulin release. Hydrogen bonds among amino groups present in insulin and hydroxyl groups present in PEG or HTCC allowed prolonged drug release. After spraying of formulation into nasal cavity, the solution formed gel at body temperature. This hydrogel system presented lower mucosal clearance and sustained in site targeted drug release. The results showed that the hydrogel can be used as nasal delivery carrier for protein or peptide drugs.

When oral drug delivery is not practicable, nasal administration of the CS hydrogels can be used for delivery of peptides and vaccines.

CS/PEG hydrogels were tested for drug delivery at the level of the gastrointestinal tract. The release rate of the drug from the PE/CS systems was delayed when compared with those only with CS, maybe because PEG can improve the CS solubility, thus increasing its transfection efficiency when used as a gene carrier.

IPNs obtained from CS and PEO proved to be appropriate carriers for drug delivery systems specific for the stomach, being effective for Helicobacter pylori treatment.

For colon drug delivery, CS-polyacrylic acid (PAA) hybrid hydrogels were tested, these ones being biodegraded by colonic normal flora.

CS/PVA hybrid hydrogels were studied as potential systems for drug delivery, using as drug model: PTX, insulin, BSA; the properties of these hydrogels (such as antitumoral activity, period of drug release) were superior to those of other delivery systems.

Zhou et al. developed a CS/poly(oligo ethylene glycol) system, used as a controlled drug release in the chemo-cryo cancer therapy.

Åhlén, Tummala, and Mihranyan reported that contact lenses based on CS-PAA nanoparticles and PVA hybrid hydrogels had greater potential for extended release during 28 h.

Due to the highly negative effects of the usual chemotherapy treatments, polysaccharide hydrogels were tested as drug carriers, in order to obtain a controlled/localized drug release. As examples are the 3D CS/PVA hybrid hydrogels developed by Jamal et al., which described the great potential in inhibiting angiogenesis of these hybrid systems.

Islam and Yasin developed CS/PVA porous hybrid hydrogels crosslinked with tetraethoxysilane as a drug delivery system for dexamethasone. By increasing the PVA concentration it was obtained a decrease of the swelling degree of the hydrogels. The pH media also affected the swelling degree, the minimum swelling being observed in acidic and basic media, and the maximum around a neutral pH. Hydrogels released around 9.4% dexamethasone during the first two hours, the released amount increasing up to six hours (Figure 5).

Yang et al. developed GC and DP for intra-tumoral therapy in vivo. GC-DP hydrogel containing antitumoral drug was injected into the disease site, for being released in situ. Moreover, the ionic GC-DP hydrogel exhibited microwave susceptibility to produce high-temperature hyperthermia for tumor ablation.

A thermoresponsive nano-sized chitosan-grafted PNIPAAm (CS-g-pN) hybrid hydrogels curcumin-loaded was developed as an advanced material that can be functionalized and optimized for targeted therapy and controlled delivery of small molecules and/or biomolecules.

For treating oral mucosa ulcer, one can use antibiotics, analgesics, adrenocortical hormones, and glucocorticoids, drugs that may induce undesirable side effects. That is why, Luo et al. prepared four different injectable CS based thermogels, using PNIPAAm and PAAm, synthesized by an in situ free radical polymerization procedure. Hybrid hydrogelswere tested from the point of view of antibacterial activity against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria, human gingival fibroblasts viability and growth, therapeutic effect, hemostatic activity.

All the four CS-based hydrogels proved antibacterial activity, the inhibition rate of the studied bacteria significantly increasing with increasing hydrogel concentration up to 5 wt%. The antibacterial activity was higher for the samples with a higher CS content (Figure 6a,b). In the meantime, all the four CS-based hybrid hydrogels induced no important toxicity towards human gingival fibroblasts and were characterized by good hemostatic properties. By comparison, the samples with the highest CS and PNIPAAm content (samples 1 and 2) were more effective in treating oral mucosa ulcer. Another important feature of some of them (i.e., 1, 2, and 4, see Figure 6) can reversibly form semi-solid gels at physiological temperature, being easily applied to oral cavity by injection.

The in vitro release of the heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) (protein that protects heart muscle for ischemic injuria) was released over a period of 14 days from a hybrid hydrogel PLGA/Alg containing also TAT peptide. After injection of this system in a myocardial infarction model, some parameters describing the heart state were significantly improved.

SA/NIPAAm hydrogels, chemically crosslinked with N,N’-methylene bis-(acrylamide), that respond at the fluctuations in temperature and pH proved to be suitable for sustained drug release of paracetamol and theophylline, a better drug entrapment and a slower drug release being obtained.

Thermo-responsive hydrogels for injectable drug administration in chemotherapeutic treatment were reported by Chen et al., who prepared hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI)-pluronic F 127 copolymer /HA systems. Injectable hydrogels were also prepared by conjugating HA with two types of complementary single-stranded DNA (HA-DNAs).

Both bFGF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were entrapped in PVA/Hep hydrogels. When compared with PVA gels, the hybrid PVA-Hep gels induced a significantly lower fraction of initial release of bFGF in the first 12 h, as well as a significantly decreased quantity of released bFGF, behavior observed for the entire followed period of time (Figure 7a). The same behavior was also evidenced when VEGF was encapsulated in PVA-Hep gels (Figure 7b). This fact suggests that PVA-Hep gels are appropriate for being used in controlled-drug release applications. In what is concerning the dual release of bFGF and VEGF, a synergistic effect was observed (Figure 7c).

Hep-based injectable hydrogels can be used to mimic the extracellular matrix as promising drug delivery systems for postoperative chemotherapy, cell delivery carrier and the regeneration of damaged liver or other tissues. Hep-based nano-hydrogels are commonly applied for cancer cell-targeted delivery, as carriers for anti-fibrotic and anti-cancer agents and gene delivery. Since Hep has high cost, dramatic loss in bioactivity and degradation when using covalent or non-covalent strategies for obtaining the hydrogels, interference with blood components), analogous Hep-mimicking (also called Hep-inspired) polymers are one of the current research hotspots to substitute the usage of Hep in the fabrication of hydrogels. Sulfonated polymers and sulfated glycosaminoglycan have been widely recognized as Hep-inspired components since they show similar bioactivity properties as Hep, such as anticlotting and antithrombotic activities, stabilization of growth factors, and promotion of angiogenesis. Between the main applications of the Hep-inspired hydrogels, one can mention: cell culture, loading of drugs/molecules, blood contacting applications.

7.1. Ability of Proteins/Peptides to Form Hybrid Hydrogels

Protein-based materials are popular as engineering bioactive scaffolds because of their advantages in mimicking the extracellular environment. Hydrogels-based on proteins are applied in biomedicine field as tissue engineering materials, drug delivery, etc., because they are easily degraded by the body and display a high biocompatibility.

Proteins can be employed as building blocks, systems embedded with particles, etc. In the design of most hybrid hydrogels composed with synthetic polymeric, peptides act as structural elements. They are generally used in hybrid systems for the improvement of mechanical properties of other polymers in the sense of malleability, and also to induce biodegradability and biocompatibility. Variety of functional groups belonging to proteins/peptides allows the physical cross-linking through hydrogen bonds, electric interactions, and/or π-π stacking.

Additionally, chemical crosslinked hybrid hydrogels can be formulated using protein—synthetic polymer couple. Common cross-linkers such as glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and carbodiimide, have been widely used in the fabrication of protein-based hybrid hydrogels in the past decades. Tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride (THPC), possessing four hydroxymethyl arms, is an effective, mild and low-cost cross-linker to make protein hydrogels. Various natural proteins, including BSA, gelatin, silk fibroin, milk protein, soy isolate protein, ovalbumin and lysozyme, could be cross-linked by THPC to form high strength hybrid hydrogels with rapid self-recovery properties. Biocompatible protein crosslinkers of proanthocyanidin, a kind of naturally occurring polyphenol extracted mainly from plants and genipin as natural crosslinkers that can be used to obtain biocompatible hybrid hydrogels based on proteins. Multi-functional natural proteins macromonomers can be also used alone as macro-crosslinkers, eliminating the need for a conventional crosslinkers.

7.2.1. Collagen

Collagen an important insoluble protein of the human and of animal body is met in skin, connective tissue, cartilage and bones. Of all twenty-nine types of collagen that have been discovered, type I is frequently used as a component in the development of biomaterials. Collagen had gained a considerable reputation in the biomedical field due to its unique properties such as low immunogenicity, low toxicity, excellent biocompatibility, good safety, biodegradability, weak antigenicity and ability of skin, bone, or other tissue regeneration. From the structural point of view, collagen based hybrid hydrogels can mimic the physiological ECM, stimulating cell migration, proliferation and adhesion, and providing bio-safe profiles and no chronic inflammatory response. Collagen hybrid hydrogels have been applied for the partial or the whole reconstruction and healing of different parts of human body including skin tissue, bone, cartilage, blood vessels, cornea, and brain parts.

7.2.2. Gelatin

Gelatin is ussualy extracted from animal (bovine, porcine) and fish (jelly fish, sea urchin) sources by acid (type A gelatin) or basic (type B gelatin) hydrolysis of collagen. The physically gelatin gels are thermo-reversible, thus during cooling, the random coil structure is in part rebuilded to a triple helical structure. The isoelectric point of type A gelatin varies between pH 7 and 9, while in case of type B gelatin, the isoelectric point is placed from pH 4.7 to 5.4. Cationic or anionic charged gelatin is usefful for loading therapeutic principles (molecules, drugs) through electrostatic interactions. In contrast with collagen, gelatin manifests good stability at high temperature in a broad interval of pH. Synthetic polymers such as PEG and PVA are some of the most used for the obtaining of hybrid gelatin based hydrogels with application in almost all the medical domains.

7.2.3. Keratin

Keratin is a group of fibrous proteins that forms the bulk of cytoplasmic epithelia and epidermal structures and is abundant in hair, nails, wool, horns and feathers. Studies on keratin-based biomaterials are mainly focused on keratin extracted from wool and poultry feathers, but more especially from human hairs because being human-derived, the risk of immune response is reduced. Two conformations can be found in keratin, α-helix and β-sheet. Like other naturally derived protein biomaterials, keratin possesses 14 types of amino acids, where cysteine plays an important role in the formation of disulfide bonds that influence the high mechanical strength of keratin.

When extracted reductively, the resulting material is known as kerateine (KTN) with thiol groups able of forming disulfide bonds. When extracted by oxidative means, is referred to as keratose (KOS). The thiol groups of the cysteine residues in KOS are “capped” as sulfonic acid residues and are unable to form disulfide bonds. These chemical differences in the proteins are known to affect the physical properties of biomaterials, particularly hydrogels, derived from keratins. KOS will form hydrogels through physical entanglements, but degrades rapidly due to the lack of covalent disulfide crosslinks. KTN persists much longer due to the presence of both physical entanglements and covalent disulfide crosslinks. Unlike collagen, keratin-based hydrogels can stay stable and resistant to biodegradation in vivo for a longer period without being degraded by enzymes because there is no keratinase or other keratin-degrading enzymes in humans and animals bodies.

In the form of hydrogels, keratin scaffolds have porous gel walls and large voids which are suitable for the cells proliferation. When keratin is combined with synthetic polymers, generally keratin-based hybrid hydrogels are obtained with potentially applications in drug delivery systems or wound healing.

7.2.4. Bovine Serum Albumin

Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is frequently used as an active principle, but in some cases as a component in a hydrogel system. because its low cost, stability, specific ligand-binding properties and increased solubility.

7.2.5. Silk

Silk, a fiber protein produced by the silkworms, is composed of two main proteins called silk sericin (SS) (25% of the total weight of raw silk) and silk fibroin (SF) (75%). Sericins, amorphous and hydrophilic proteins, act as a gummy/adhesive substance that joins the fibroin filaments. This glue-like sericin protein gets wrap around the SF, what is hydrophobic, highly crystalline with an oriented structure. Silk based biomaterials has various advantageous features, including excellent biocompatibility, controllable biodegradation, and desirable mechanical properties, are nontoxic, nonimmunogenic, and have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for use in the human body for sustained-release drug delivery systems, bone and skin tissue regeneration and repair, biosensor, and 3D bioprinting. It was demonstrated that SS plays a crucial role in the antibacterial process of wound treatment. The sol–gel transition of aqueous solution of SF is a natural process which without an exterior stimulus is quite long, usually a week to a month, which may limit its practical use. Therefore, there are some factors that can stimulate and enhance the gelation kinetics of SF. For example, reducing the electrostatic repulsion by lowering the pH (<5), increasing the gelation temperature (>60 °C), increasing in protein sol-gel critical concentration (> 5–10% (w/v)), blending with polyhydric alcohol agents, or adding divalent ions (Ca2+) can decrease the gelation time by attenuating the hydrophobic interactions amongst protein chains. Physical methods such as ultrasonication, or chemical crosslinking or a polyreaction of additive micromolecular agents, accelerate the gelation of fibroin. Nevertheless, these physically or chemically stimulated sol–gel transitions are almost irreversible. During the gelation process fibroin molecules rearrange from a random coil conformation in the sol state to an antiparallel β sheet conformation in the gelled state. The presence of a large amount of Gly-Ala repeats units in fibroin favors the formation of β sheets which accelerate its gelation. Silk polymers can be engineered to produce thermo-sensitive hydrogels. At room temperature, the thermo-sensitive hydrogel may remain liquid but at body temperature exists as a hydrogel.

7.2.6. Resilin

Resilin is a pliable and extendable structural protein found in insects. It is named for its resilience to repeated rounds of stretching and relaxation. Resilin has ability to store mechanical energy.

7.2.7. Whey Proteins

Whey proteins (WP) are globular milk-derived proteins and contain as major protein fractions β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin and BSA. They are extremely inexpensive and abundantly available in various forms (concentrates—WPC, hydrolysates—WPH, and isolates—WPI). Heat treatment of an aqueous solution of whey protein isolate (WPI) above 60 °C results in its unfolding followed by the formation of new inter-and intra-protein bonds that create a three-dimensional gel network. Biodegradability and ability of WPI to form a hydrogel without the use of chemical cross-linking agents makes it attractive for use in biomedical applications.

7.2.8. Soy Protein Isolate

Soy protein isolate (SPI), contains two major components: glycinin (52%) and conglycinin (35%), with hydrophobic components in the molecular structure. Soy protein has advantages over the various types of natural proteins employed for biomedical applications due to its low price, nonanimal origin, and relatively long storage time and stability. Because of its globular structure, soy protein is more resistant to hydrolysis compared with coiled or helical structures. SPI is an electroactive protein with an increased content of polar amino acid moeties that produces charges in various conditions of pHs especially in strong acidic or basic pH, which recommend its to be used as a natural protein-based electroactive hydrogel for microsensor and actuator, particularly in the biomedical area. Due to their flexibility, SP materials could also be successfully processed into scaffolds by a 3D printing. Residues resulted after the degradation process of SP based hydrogels were demonstrated to be non-toxic and also are capable to promote collagen deposition in cultures of fibroblast cells and to determine the mineralization in the presence of osteoblasts, hence sustaining the ideea that SP manifest intrinsic bioactivity.

Peptides derived from native soy protein may be employed as excellent building blocks to fabricate hybrid hydrogels. The procedure includes the dissolving of native SPI in alkaline solution (such us urea) where it is denatured and unfolded to peptide chains. Thus, the unfolded peptide chains will induce an increase of protein solubility in water. Moreover, the exposed sulfhydryl and hydrophobic groups on the peptide chains will be employed for further chemical reactions. The use of SP chains as structural components into hydrogels have some advantages such as cell and growth factor or surface binding and electroactive characteristics.

Due to their various potential biomedical applications, hydrogels based on engineered proteins have attracted considerable interest. Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium-binding protein with an important role in the biological recognition being used as an element in stimuli-sensitive hydrogels. It has the ability to manifests a large conformational change on binding calcium, certain peptides, and the phenothiazine group of drugs (anti-psychotics). CaM undergoes two different types of conformational changes, an apo-state in the absence of a ligand, and a holo-state when it is bounded to a ligand. Thus, in the presence of Ca2+, CaM undergoes a rapid transition from an extended dumbbell conformation to a collapsed (more constrictive) conformation in response to binding of ligands (small molecule drugs, peptides, a variety of proteins). When Ca2+ is removed from CaM, the protein changes from its bound conformation to native conformation. New classes of CaM based hydrogels should lead to a new breed of intelligent biomaterials that could find many applications in the field of responsive drug delivery systems, as well as in a variety of microfluidics systems and BioMEMS devices.

7.2.9. Elastin

Elastin represents a structural protein of the ECM providing tensile strength and elasticity. Natural elastin hardly has been used as a hydrogel in biomaterial field. An important requirement when using proteins as biomaterial is the purity. During the synthesis, elastin can be contaminated and may induce immunological responses. Additionally, elastin is insoluble and has a strong tendency to calcify, making purification even more difficult. Consequently, soluble forms of elastin including tropoelastin, α-elastin, and elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) are frequently used to form crosslinked hydrogels.

The gelation process of ELPs is influenced by the temperature. When the temperature is reduced under a certain value, the hydrophobic groups are fenced by ordered water molecules from hydrophobic hydration, and ELPs became soluble. Above this transition temperature, the H2O molecules surrounding the ELPs become bulky being less-ordered, and thus the protein is collapsed. This leads to the folding and self-assembly of ELP, and consequently the gelation occurs. No hydrogels based on elastin and synthetic polymers have been reported in literature.

Self-assembled Leucine zipper (LZ) was first studied by Petka et al. started with 1998. From that moment, LZ building blocks were involved in the devlopment of self-assembled protein based hydrogels, initiating remarkable possibility for using genetic engineering proteins to adjust the physical and functional properties of hybrid hydrogel materials. The high flexibility of the random-coil like polypeptides incline to form intramolecular loops, conducting to an unwanted and accelerated erosion rate of the hydrogel matrix. Peptides with different biological functions can be incorporated in the LZ protein backbone to create a functional chimeric protein or fusion proteins with self-assembling properties for the use in tissue engineering applications. Shu et al. designed polypeptide-polymer conjugates using PEG chains covalently bounded to the exterior side chain of peptides forming tertiary structures, that could be leucine zipper. This knowledge is usefull for the development of new self-assembled and responsive protein based hybrid hydrogels.

7.3. Biomedical Applications of Protein Based Hybrid Hydrogels

The main biomedical applications of the protein based hybrid hydrogels are summarized in Table 4 Some of the most recent (from the last 6 years) application in the biomedical field of protein based hydrogels in combination with a synthetic polymer are given in Table 5. As can be observed, most of the researchers are trying to find the most biocompatible way to develop a new biomaterial without the use of chemical cross-linkers (which are very toxics) even if the gelation process is formed by chemical or physical interactions.

7.3.1. Tissue Engineering

In situ forming hydrogel systems have attracted considerable interest as injectable scaffolds for tissue engineering and drug delivery due to their easy applications and minimally invasive injection procedure. By modification of gelatin with hydroxyphenyl propionic acid (HPA) and conjugation of 4-arm-polypropylene oxide−polyethylene oxide (4-Arm-PPO-PEO = Tetronic) with tyramines, Park et al. succeeded to prepare an injectable hydrogel by mixing the solutions of the two components in the presence of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).

During the enzymatic coupling reaction under physiological conditions, HRP facilitated to the phenol molecules from both in modified gelatin and conjugate, to participate to the coupling reaction by interaction via C-C bond in ortho position or with C-O bonds at phenoxy oxygen. After the subcutaneous injection on mice, gelatin based hybrid hydrogel was quickly created allowing the natural tissues growth into the hydrogel network.

SF has also been considered as a candidate for 3D bioprinting, as the protein polymer chains can be physically crosslinked through intermolecular and intramolecular β-sheet structure formation via hydrophobic interactions to stabilize the materials without the need for chemical reactions or additives. Thus, SF/PEG hydrogels were studied as self-standing bioinks (biological ink) for 3D printing use in tissue engineering. Mixing PEG with silk induces physical crosslinking and thus rapid gelation of silk and water insolubility. After subcutaneously implantation in mice, the bioink gel with and without fibroblast maintained shape and structure after 6 weeks, and a significant amount of cells remained alive in the gel matrix.

One single example of hybrid resilin based hydrogel have been reported in literature by McGann et al. that was composed of a resilin-like polypeptides (RLPs) and a multi-arm PEG macromer. This hybrid hydrogel can be rapidly cross-linked through a Michael-type addition reaction between the thiols of cysteine residues on the RLP and vinyl sulfone groups on the multi-arm PEG. The obtained elastic and resilient hydrogels are capable to encapsulate human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), are biodegradable and possess rubber-like properties that would be useful for mechanically-demanding tissue engineering applications, especially those aiming to remedy cardiovascular pathologies.

Liu et al. obtained photo-crosslinkable physical hydrogels with practicability in artificial ECM. Before the hydrogel synthesis step, this research group created macromers comprising a hydrophilic chain with a terminal self-assembling leucine zipper domain A and a terminal photoreactive acrylate group (PEGDA). LZ domain A was chosen due to its ability to undergoes tetrameric physical association that will allow the hydrophilic polymers to self-assemble into four-arm macromers. Then, the four-arm macromers were photo-crosslinked into hydrogels, where their biodegradability and ability to mimic nonproteolytically mediated cell migration and outgrowth by reversible opening and closing the 3D cell migration paths in biological systems, was demonstrated.

7.3.2. Bone Tissue Engineering

Sometimes, the injectable property of traditional protein based hydrogel is unsatisfactory, which cannot provide adaptable filling of lesion defects with irregular shapes. Thus, the adding to it of a synthetic polymer with propper properties can be the solution for these problems.

There are hydrogels that are not suitable for applications in musculoskeletal systems, because most of them often exhibit too weak mechanical properties owing to a decreased elastic modulus ranging from kPa to MPa, in comparison with the native bone tissue that exert a modulus between 1 and 20 GPa. Because human cells respond differently to various mechanical stresses, such as compression, tension and shear, it is essential for a hydrogel scaffold to support loads and movements when is used an implant. Fortunately, by growing the number density of crosslinks and the polymer concentration inside the network gel or by combining two or more IPNs, this way has allowed scientists to obtain hydrogels with increased stiffness. Microfabrication techniques such as electrospinning and 3D printing have also proven to be successfully used in the designing of hydrogels with strong and complex structures for bone engineering applications.

Liu et al. obtained a biomimetic bone substitute comprising a type I collagen matrix gel in which poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone) nanoyarns were incorporated before gelation using a water vortex as collector, instead of traditional rotating drums or dual metal collection rings, to produce aligned nanoyarns in order to increase the mechanical strength of the resulted hydrogels allowing in the same time the cell proliferative ability of collagen. The nanoyarns were short enough to eliminate the entanglements formation when they were suspended in the protein solution.

Gan et al. studied the interpenetration between a primary network made of dextran and gelatin and a secondary network composed of PEG. The resulted hybrid hydrogels exhibited improved toughness and good proliferation, clustering and adhesion of the incorporated nucleus pulposus cells, when the proportion of the natural network was 4-fold greater than the synthetic one.

7.3.3. Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Several hybrid hydrogels have been developed as injectable scaffolds to mimic the ECM of cartilage. Wang et al. obtained in situ injectable silk solutions of mixed silk and low-molecular-weight PEG formed hydrogels in less than 30 min when the concentration of PEG in the gel was 40–45%. A scaffold/nano- or micro-particles system is introduced for accelerated healing by sustained release of drugs/biomolecules or/and by rapid cell proliferation. Thus, gelatin can be part of the scaffold or of the particles. For example, Xu et al. reported the fabrication of the alginate-gelatin hydrogel microspheres using an electrospray technique, that were embedded with human bone marrow stromal cell (hBMSCs), and then seeded and assembled in 3D-printed PCL scaffolds for the fabrication of a mechanically stable and biologically supportive tissue engineering cartilage construct. In Asadi et al. study, gelatin was used as a component of hydrogel scaffold. In this case, PCL−PEG−PCL nanoparticles loaded with transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) were embedded in the gelatin hydrogel scaffolds and investigated as system for cartilage tissue engineering.

Lee et al. developed a strategy to engineer an auricular cartilage using SF and PVA hydrogel. They demonstrated that an intact 3D ear-shaped auricular cartilage formed six weeks after the subcutaneous implantation of a chondrocyte-seeded 3D ear-shaped P50/S50 hydrogel in rats.

7.3.4. Wound Healing

An ideal scaffold for skin tissue regeneration is expected to be biocompatible, biodegradable where the degradation rate should be correlated with the regeneration time of the new tissue, and should have interconnected pores of appropriate size allowing cell attachment, migration, proliferation and vascularization to supply the necessary nutrients to the newly formed tissue. Most of the hydrogels used for wound dressing are usually loaded with drug to increase the rate of healing of the skin. Shamloo et al. prepared a PVA/chitosan/gelatin hydrogel embedded with PCL microspheres by a double-emulsion-solvent-evaporation method destined for accelerated wound healing by sustained release of bFGF. Electron beam irradiation (EBI) was used to prepare hybrid keratin based hydrogels in the presence of two synthetic polymers, namely PVA and polyethylenimine (PEI) that influence the gelation rate of keratin. In this work, keratin was extracted from two natural sources, human hair and wool, using sulfitolysis reaction with sodium disulfite in order to cleave the cystine disulfide bonds and to form cysteine thiol. Because during EBI, the aqueous solution of obtained reduced keratin was not converted to gel, PVA was added to the solution inducing gel formation at an EBI dose of approximately 90 kGy. Besides, by the addition of a secondary synthetic polymer, namelly PEI, in the aqueous blend containing S-sulfo keratin and PVA, the gelation occurs at a much lower irradiation dose, up to 10 kGy. The gel forming may be assigned not only to the physical interaction between S-sulfo keratin chains, oxygen groups in PVA aqueous solution and the amine groups of PEI, but also to the keratin covalent crosslinking by EBI. Later, these hydrogels have been tested for wound healing and was suggested that the treatment with these keratin-based hydrogels enhanced the production of new collagen and fibroblast proliferation during granulation tissue formation and the remodeling phase of wound healing. Synthetic polymers as PEGDA, PVA, poly(N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide) (PHEA), PAAm etc., were used in combination with silk sericin to obtain hybrid hydrogels that could be used especially for wound dressings and dermal reconstructions.

7.3.5. Drug and Molecule Delivery

Due to its biocompatibility and well-established safety profiles, hydrogels fabricated using collagen have been employed as delivery vehicles for therapeutic genes, which can direct and/or enhance the function of the transplanted or endogenous cells.

Krebs et al. showed the collagen chains ability to locally load siRNA (small interfering RNA) and then release it in a controlled manner in order to extend the effect directly at the specific target. Peng et al. tested collagen based hybrid hydrogels for the Id1-siRNA targeting and its delivery and sustained release for the treatment of gastric cancer. To improve the siRNA delivery by stimulating the target of Id1-siRNA into the defect cells and prolonging the silencing effect, cationic PEI was further engaged for scaffold modification.

Gelatin has been used for nanogels preparation for different biomedical applications. In this respect, activated PEG methyl ether was grafted onto gelatin backbone to obtain the gelatin-PEG copolymer and then self-assembled to form nanogels (Figure 8) that were encapsulated with poor water soluble curcumin (CUR) for cancer treatment. Nanogels improved the solubility of CUR in the aqueous environment, protected it from the hydrolytic degradation and also increased the amount of delivered CUR in a control release manner, thus enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of CUR.

Gelatins have been used in designing of different formulations suitable as vectors for gene delivery. Rumschöttel et al. were incorporated core-shell like spherical DNA/PEI polyplexes in gelatin hydrogels. After a μ-DSC study, it has concluded that by adding a third component, e.g., gelatin, the complex stability between the polycation PEI and the negatively charged DNA is influenced by its interaction with the polycation shell. Thus, the effect of the gelatin can be explained by the weakening of the electrostatic interactions in DNA/PEI polyplexes, due to the gelatin attachment to the PEI shell or partially takes off the PEI from the shell. Conversely, in the DNA/maltose-modified PEI polyplexes, a stronger interaction via H-bonding between maltose units and gelatin was confirmed.

A pH sensitive and partly-biodegradable sIPN hydrogel based on methacrylic acid, BSA, and PEG, with potential application as drug delivery systems, was prepared by UV initiated free radical polymerization. Additionally, BSA was copolymerized with PEG to obtain high-water content (>96%) hydrogels that be useful for the preparation of controlled release devices in the field of wound dressing.

In the field of controlled and sustained drug delivery systems, SF based hydrogels were tested using as model drugs curcumin and hydrophobic/hydrophilic drugs, namely aspirin and indomethacin, where the synthetic part was represented by PVA and PLA-PEG-PLA copolymer, respectively.

WPI based hydrogels can be used as bioresponsive carriers for controlled release of biomolecules and drugs, as they exhibit good pH-sensitivity and protects the entrapped drug from degradation by its grafting onto synthetic polymers resulting co-polymers. An example was reported by Aderibigbe and Ndwabu who prepared by simultaneous redox cross-linked polymerization an WPI-g-carbopol polyacrylamide based hydrogel loaded with pamidronate, (nitrogen containing bisphosphonate), to treat the skeletal disorders in children, osteoporosis and bone cancer. The hybrid hydrogels showed a pH dependent swelling behavior, being more swollen at high pH values.

8. Nucleic Acids Based Hybrid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) are polynucleotides with distinct biological function. The specific bonding of DNA base pairs (for example guanine–cytosine, adenine–thymine for DNA and adenine–uracil in the case of RNA) provide the chemical foundation for genetics, being a powerful molecular recognition system. The level of versatility and structural programmability of nucleic acids ranks them on a higher level in the field of biomedical applications compared to other natural or synthetic polymers. Since 2001 (according to SCOPUS database) there has been an intensification of research in the field of nucleic acids-based hydrogel development, especially due to the great progress in DNA synthesis and consequently the accessibility of larger amounts of DNA. Due to the outstanding properties of nucleic acids as hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, stimuli responsiveness, versatility and structural programmability, controlled biodegradability, which can be exploited in the development of new materials for numerous biomedical applications, this may be the subject of a separate review. In the recent published scientific literature there are already comprehensive reviews covering all aspects of obtaining and using hydrogels based on or containing nucleic acids in biomedical applications. Hence, in the current review is presented just a short summary regarding the development of nucleic acids-containing hydrogels.

8.1. Nucleic Acids Ability to Form Hydrogels

DNA is an outstanding component for the obtaining of supramolecular hydrogels, especially because it is an amphiphilic bio-polylectrolyte capable to absorb large quantities of water and may induce in the incorporating material controllable properties, programmability and biocompatibility. At this moment there are three approaches for using nucleic acids in the construction of hydrogels, namely: (1) as a building unit for hydrogel-based materials—representing the so called “all-DNA” hydrogels; (2) as biocompatible cross-linkers combining nucleic acids with synthetic polymers, resulting hybrid hydrogels; and (3) short DNA sequences (e.g., aptamers) that act as functional grafts to obtain tailorable hydrogels with unique bio-specificity.

Even though DNA-based hydrogels have numerous distinctive properties, their use in the biomedical field beyond conceptual demonstration is limited by a number of shortcomings, namely: small number of functional groups available (needed in further chemical modifications), highly negative net charge, and high costs of synthesis. To overcome these drawbacks, the combination of nucleic acids with hydrophilic polymer scaffolds represents a promising approach. Polyamines show the ability to bind DNA by promoting its condensation, a process of paramount importance in medical applications, mainly in immunotherapy. Among the synthetic polyamines, poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) is one of the most prominent examples of cationic polymers capable to induce condensation of DNA. PEI has a high charge density and by electrostatic interactions it can strongly bind to DNA leading to its compaction.

8.2.1. Drug Delivery

Spherical DNA-based nanogels were synthesized by Costa et al. using PEI as pDNA condensation agent. These nanogels showed very low size distribution, high loading capacity and interesting release kinetics of simultaneous delivery of pDNA and drugs. In a recent study, DNA was grafted with PCL to obtain hybrid nanogels that were then loaded with Cas9/single guide RNA complex. The resulted DNA based hybrid hydrogel can be used as carrier for gene editing tool delivery that provides excellent physiological stability against nuclease digestion.

8.2.2. Immunotherapy

Mimi et al. have fabricated a gelatin PEI core shell nanogel via a two-stage synthesis. The resultant nanogels are highly uniform spherical particles and have a well-defined core shell nanostructure with a biodegradable gelatin core and a hairy and extended PEI shell. The resultant nanogels were able to completely condense siRNA, forming stable complexes that were capable of protecting the siRNA from enzymatic degradation. The gelatin PEI nanogels were four times less toxic than the native PEI, and were able to effectively deliver the siRNA into HeLa cells. Increasing the N/P ratio significantly improved the intracellular uptake efficiency of the siRNA. Li et al. has proposed a flexible strategy to design well-defined reducible cationic nanogels (PGED-NGs) based on ethylenediamine (ED)-functionalized low-molecular-weight poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) with friendly crosslinking reagents (α-lipoic acid). PGED-NGs could effectively complex pDNA and siRNA. Compared with pristine PGED, PGED-NGs exhibited much better performance of pDNA transfection. PGED-NGs also could efficiently transport metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 siRNA into hepatoma cells and significantly suppressed cancer cell proliferation and migration. After the photoisomerization of the Azo moiety on the DNA cross-linker, Kang et al. succeded to develop photoresponsive hydrogels based on comb-shaped DNA-polyacrylamide conjugates that can be used for the DOX delivery in cancer therapy. More precisely, these hybrid hydrogels were capable to carry and then to release a large amount of active drug molecules (DOX) in a controllable manner due to their ability to transform in sol upon UV light irradiation, and subsequent inducing a very high rate of cancer cell death. siRNA based nanoparticle complexes have been embedded in PEG-PLA-dimethacrylate hydrogels in order to obtain biodegradable systems that exhibits high controlled tissue-specific localization and sustained gene delivery due to the hydrolytic degradation of ester bonds within the PLA crosslinks. Negatively-charged siRNA was complexed to nanoparticles by its self-assembly with a poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)-b-poly-(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-propylacrylic acid-co-butyl methacrylate) diblock polymer.

8.2.3. Biosensing Applications

The analyte-triggered opening of the DNA-crosslinked structures and consequent dissociation of the gel networks can initiate the release of encapsulated signal substances to generate an output signal. Using different responsive DNA hydrogels in which enzymes, DNAzymes, or catalytic nanomaterials are entrapped, researchers have developed various colorimetric visual sensors and readout devices based on the sol-gel transition strategy for different kinds of biotargets, such as metal ions and glucose. Liu and co-workers demonstrated that covalently crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogels can be used as a platform to attach Hg2+-responsive DNA structures for the ultrasensitive detection and removal of Hg2+. Shape-memory DNA hydrogels that can reversibly respond to external stimuli have also been developed. Hu et al. designed bilayer hybrid hydrogels whose stiffness can be controlled by different triggers such us thermal and pH (i-motif) stimuli. One of the two layers was consisted of a non-responsive hydrogel based on acrydite-DNA crosslinked polyacrylamide, and the second layer included a thermosensitive acrydite-DNA crosslinked PNIPAM based hydrogel. The two-layer hybrid hydrogels that exhibits controlled stimuli-induced shape transitions are promising for the use in the biomedical field as intelligent actuators. Similar studies, of shape memory hydrogels that include DNA and polyacrylamide were found in the scientific literature. In Figure 9 is illustrated a photoresponsive hybrid hydrogel that reveals light-induced switchable stiffness functions. The hybrid hydrogel is based on pDNA crosslinked with polyacrylamide and stabilized by trans-azobenzene intercalator units.

9. Hybrid Hydrogels Containing Lignin for Biomedical Applications

Lignin hydrogels are considered to have a great potential for valorization of this abundant polyaromatic bio-polymer abundant in plants and which results as by-product in pulp and paper industry. The three phenolic sub-structures of the lignin structure, namely syringyl (S), guaiacyl (G), and p-hydroxyphenyl (H) units and also lignin derivatives (resulted by epoxidation, amination, hydroxyalkylation, nitration, halogenation, sulfomethylation, etc.) contain many different functional groups (hydroxyls, carboxyls, carbonyls and methoxyls) as active sites, in preparation of functional hydrogels both by physical crosslinking with hydrophilic polymers by H-bonding and also by, polymerization, copolymerization, ATRP and reversible addition-fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization, chemical crosslinking, crosslinking grafted lignin and monomers etc..

Lignin-based hydrogels had a rougher surface morphology and a porous structure related to an increasing lignin concentration. The water uptake and the water retention of lignin-based hydrogels depend on structure of the hydrogels, including the pores sizes and the surface morphology. Physical hybrid hydrogels showed self-healing capability due to the dynamic hydrogen bonding between lignin and hydrophilic polymers.

Increasing the content of lignin in hydrogels significantly improved the mechanical properties of the hydrogels and they show excellent strength properties. The biodegradation of the lignin-based hydrogel depends on the crosslink density and the phenolics content in the hydrogel. The former is correlated with small pores, stronger cross-linked gels which had less accessibility for lignolytic fungi and actinomycetes whch induces high resistance against microbial attack than slightly cross-linked hydrogels. The phenolic substructures in hydrogels directly attacked the expressed enzyme systems of lignolytic fungi so they protect plant from fungi invasion. Hydrogels containing lignin and its derivatives with acrylic acid, methacrylic and NIPAAm monomers exhibit external stimuli response as pH response, thermoresponsiveness and mechanical response. The self-healing property of lignin-based supramolecular lignin-based hydrogel with α-cyclodextrin and a hyper branch architecture was obtained that possessed a mechanical response feature. When the oscillation stain increased, the solid-like hydrogel translated into liquid-like, and the liquid-like hydrogel recovered to be solid-like via self-assembly when the oscillate stain decreased.

The biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity and eco-friendliness of lignin-based hydrogels are main features which have determined their wide application as biomaterials in many fields as for controlled release of the functional materials including enzyme immobilization and drug delivery.

9.1. Bioactive Compounds Delivery

Lignin-based hydrogels could be used as biological carriers for human hepatocytes culture, because a large number of hepatocytes adhered to the pores of the lignin-based hydrogel, and a higher cell proliferation rate and metabolic activity was reported. From lignin grafted polymers and hydrophilic polyurethane/acrylic monomer, a double-network hydrogel with tough and pH sensitive properties was prepared and can be processed by fiber spinning, casting and 3D printing, this one being biocompatible with primary human dermal fibroblasts. Lipase immobilized on cellulose/lignin hydrogel beads exhibited higher stability and activity.

A hydrophilic supramolecular complex of hemicellulose/oak lignin hydrogel with pectin embedded in the 3D structure was prepared and tested to deliver β-glucuronidase and estrogens.

A smart hydrogel of carboxylated lignin nanoparticles/PEG-poly(histidine) block copolymer/a cell-penetrating peptide loaded with a poorly water-soluble cytotoxic agent was evaluated for chemotherapeutic potential. The reactivity of lignin with epichlorohydrine as curing agent was exploited to obtain superabsorbent hydrogels with cellulose and its derivatives, PVA, xanthan, which controlled release active substances as phenols and vanillin, active aroma ingredient,.

Acid activated lignosulphonate/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogel is a good carrier for controlled release of amoxicillin.

9.2. Applications as Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Antifungal materials

Lignin itself, as a complex natural polymer with phenolic groups, possess non-toxicity, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antifungal properties, which may enhance the potential application in food science and health care of its hydrogels. Antibacterial and antioxidant agents like CS and Alg had been added into lignin-based hydrogels, which had great potential to be applied in biosensors and tissue engineering.

Modification of the lignin with triazole moiety enhances the antibiofilm and antimicrobial activities. A new hydrogel was prepared as an ointment for anti-infection, which had abilities to prevent infection of burn wound and could be used as an anti-inflammatory dressing and aid-healing material. Lignin/CS hydrogels show a good potential applicability in wound healing, since these hydrogels present a good cell attachment and proliferation of NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast. Highly antibacterial lignin-based hydrogels for drug delivery have been recently reported against Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis, behaviour demonstrated for hydrogels prepared with lignin, cellulose, hyaluronan, Gantrez S-97 (poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic acid), poly(ethylene glycol) or glycerol and others.

10. Conclusions and Future Trends

Because of the large availability of materials used in organic hybrid polymeric hydrogels (both synthetic and natural polymers), the number of possible combinations is enormous, which explained the large number of publications only in the last decades (more than 2000 annually). The biomedical applications of the hydrogels started back multiple decades and their study is continuously growing.

In this review, some selective research studies have been summarized especially in the last two decades, for the preparation of natural polymers-containing hybrid hydrogels and their potential application in a wide range of medical applications. It was described both advantages and disadvantages of each hydrogel applied in different medical application. Desired hybrid hydrogels may be developed for targeted applications by making changes in composition, use of specific biomolecules, antimicrobial agents, use of suitable cells, and selecting suitable synthesis routes and processing techniques. The successful use of a polymeric hybrid hydrogel consists in creating a three-dimensional micro-/nano environment that represents a synthetic ECM for the cells, which should provide biodegradability, biocompatibility, pore interconnectivity to assure the penetration and absorption of nutrient, modulation of proliferation for successful reconstruction of organs, cell-adhesion and regeneration certain tissue. In the most recent researches, injectable hydrogels and 3D-bioprinted hybrid hydrogels allow successful their interaction with the cells of damaged tissues. The hybrid nano hydrogel materials are able to convert external stimuli signals to heat, highly oxidative species etc., which are helpful for combinatorial therapies and theranostics. By a simple hybridization of the components of the hybrid hydrogels smart multiresponsive materials can be obtained by synergistic combination of the best properties of both components, useful toward applications in nanomedicine which exhibit an excellent targetability, minimal side effects in treatments and diagnostic. The industrial application of the new hybrid hydro/nanogels materials is in its first steps and it need more relevant clinical data concerning their safety and efficacy in vivo. In Table 6 are listed few examples of hybrid nanogels/hydrogels evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies.

CHP nanogels have been used as an intranasal vaccine-delivery system their clinical trials showed promising results for therapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and HER2 expressing cancer patients. The CHPHER2 complex vaccine was safe, well tolerated and showed specific antibody responses (Phase I and II of trial). From the products already on the market that use a combination, one can mention the HYAFFTM esterified hyaluronic acid, produced by FIDIA Ltd.: LaserskinAutograft® (made of a HA-membrane with keratinocytes), and Hyalo-graft 3D® (made with HA, but with fibroblasts added). More preclinical studies are needed to provide convincing resources for supporting advanced clinical applications.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization, probiotics are “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”. For probiotic delivery systems, biomaterials such as proteins (gelatin, casein or whey proteins), polysaccharides, as well as synthetic polymers, such as poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid), polyvinyl alcohol or Eudragit (poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethyl acrylate) 1:1) could be used.

The complex (synthetic and natural) polymeric hybrid hydrogels with functional domains or nano/microstructures that provide both improved mechanical and physical properties, tunable release kinetics for targeted drug therapy, mediated cell response, stimuli-responsive material behavior are under continuously development. Their use in clinical and research applications in biomedical practice, as drug discovery, drug/gene delivery, regenerative medicine, etc., is very promising. New and/or improve existing multi length-scale methodologies for predicting the properties of the materials based on those of the individual components, as a guide for experimental development is necessary. A better understanding of the interactions between components of the hybrid hydrogels will lead to a more efficient design and control of their mechanical performance, long-term stability, the hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of the material for improved drug loading capacity and controlled release, or the precise control of shape variations induced by external stimuli, to name a few. They are used to impart to homopolysaccharides-based hydrogels stimuli responsiveness (e.g., pH, temperature), to improve their mechanical properties, etc. Is noticed a tendency of the research towards the variation of the methods of modifying the polysaccharides properties (by obtaining new copolymers, functionalization through various chemical reactions, using innovative techniques such as 3D printing or electrospinning) to meet the specific requirements of biomedical applications. Using composite hydrogels containing various inorganic nanoparticle is another direction with multiple possibilities to obtain materials with tunable properties and targeting applications directed to personalized medicine. This are/will be subject to other many reviews.

References 466

  1. 1.

    Kumar A., Han S.S. PVA-based hydrogels for tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2017;66:159-182.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2016.1190930

  2. 2.

    Budama-Kilinc Y., Cakir-Koc R., Aslan B., Özkan B., Mutlu H., Üstün E., Dobrzański L.A. Chapter 12: Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine. Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine. 2018;277-301.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Durmaz S., Okay O. Acrylamide/2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid sodium salt-based hydrogels: Synthesis and characterization. Polymer. 2000;41:3693-3704.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00558-3

  4. 4.

    Ekici S., Saraydin D. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of IPN hydrogels for antibiotic release. Drug Deliv. 2004;11:381-388.

    Not in our library10.1080/10717540490884804

  5. 5.

    Peppas N.P., Leobandung W., Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000;50:27-46.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0939-6411(00)00090-4

  6. 6.

    Swami S.N. Radiation synthesis of polymeric hydrogels for swelling-controlled drug release studies. Ph.D. Thesis. 2004.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Katime I., Novoa R., Zuluaga F. Swelling kinetics and release studies of theophylline and aminophylline from acrylic acid/n-alkyl methacrylate hydrogels. Eur. Polym. J. 2001;37:1465-1471.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0014-3057(01)00004-0

  8. 8.

    Zhang T., Yang R., Yang S., Guan J., Zhang D., Ma Y., Liu H. Research progress of self-assembled nanogel and hybrid hydrogel systems based on pullulan derivatives. Drug Deliv. 2018;25:278-292.

    Not in our library10.1080/10717544.2018.1425776

  9. 9.

    Kopeček J., Tang A., Wang C., Stewart R.J. De novo design of biomedical polymers. Hybrids from synthetic macromolecules and genetically engineered protein domains. Macomol. Symp. 2001;174:31-42.

    Not in our library10.1002/1521-3900(200109)174:1<31::aid-masy31>3.0.co;2-6

  10. 10.

    Molina M., Asadian-Birjand M., Balach J., Bergueiro J., Miceliac E., Calderon M. Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:6161-6186.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5cs00199d

  11. 11.

    Jia X., Kiick K.L. Hybrid multicomponent hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2009;9:140-156.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200800284

  12. 12.

    Myung D., Waters D., Wiseman M., Duhamel P.E., Noolandi J., Ta C.N., Frank C.W. Progress in the development of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008;19:647-657.

    Not in our library10.1002/pat.1134

  13. 13.

    Jonker A.M., Löwik D.W.P.M., van Hest J.C.M. Peptide- and protein-based hydrogels. Chem. Mater. 2012;24:759-773.

    Not in our library10.1021/cm202640w

  14. 14.

    Lau H.K., Kiick K.L. Opportunities for multicomponent hybrid hydrogels in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:28-42.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm501361c

  15. 15.

    Maisani M., Pezzoli D., Chassande O., Mantovani D. Cellularizing hydrogel-based scaffolds to repair bone tissue: How to create a physiologically relevant micro-environment? J. Tissue Eng. 2017;8.

    Not in our library10.1177/2041731417712073

  16. 16.

    Joseph C.A., McCarthy C.W., Tyo A., Hubbard K., Fisher H., Altscheffel J., He W., Pinnaratip R., Lui Y., Lee B.P., et al. Development of an injectable nitric oxide releasing poly(ethylene) glycol-Fibrin adhesive hydrogel. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:959-969.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01331

  17. 17.

    Hoffman A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001;944:62-73.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03823.x

  18. 18.

    Yang G., Lin H., Rothrauff B.B., Yu S., Tuan R.S. Multilayered polycaprolactone/gelatin fiber-hydrogel composite for tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2016;35:68-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.004

  19. 19.

    Patel D., Sharma S., Screen H.R.C., Bryant S.J. Effects of cell adhesion motif, fiber stiffness, and cyclic strainon tenocyte gene expression in a tendon mimetic fiber composite hydrogel. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;499:642-647.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.203

  20. 20.

    Kopeček J. Hydrogel Biomaterials: A Smart Future? Biomaterials. 2007;28:5185-5192.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.044

  21. 21.

    Liang Y., Liu W., Han B., Yang C., Ma Q., Song F., Bi Q. An in situ formed biodegradable hydrogel for reconstruction of the corneal endothelium. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces. 2011;82:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.043

  22. 22.

    Ehrick J.D., Deo S.K., Browning T.W., Bachas L.G., Madou M.J., Daunert S. Genetically engineered protein in hydrogels tailors stimuli-responsive characteristics. Nat. Mater. 2005;4:298-302.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat1352

  23. 23.

    Sengupta D., Heilshorn S.C. Protein-engineered biomaterials: Highly tunable tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part B: Rev. 2010;16:285-293.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0591

  24. 24.

    Foo W.P.C.T., Lee J.S., Mulyasasmita W., Parisi-Amon A., Heilshorn S.C. Two-component protein-engineered physical hydrogels for cell encapsulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:22067-22072.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0904851106

  25. 25.

    Sakai S., Hirose K., Taguchi K., Ogushi Y., Kawakami K. An injectable, in situ enzymatically gellable, gelatin derivative for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3371-3377.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.030

  26. 26.

    Xing Y., Cheng E., Yang Y., Chen P., Zhang T., Sun Y., Yang Z., Liu D. Self-assembled DNA hydrogels with designable thermal and enzymatic responsiveness. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:1117-1121.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201003343

  27. 27.

    Davidenko N., Campbell J.J., Thian E.S., Watson C.J., Cameron R.E. Collagen–hyaluronic acid scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3957-3968.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.005

  28. 28.

    Raschip I.E., Hitruc G.E., Vasile C., Popescu M.C. Effect of the lignin type on the morphology and thermal properties of xanthan/lignin hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;54:230-237.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.12.036

  29. 29.

    Raschip I.E., Hitruc E.G., Vasile C. Semi-interpenetrating polymer networks containing polysaccharides. II. Xanthan/lignin network: A spectral and thermal characterization. High Perform. Polym. 2011;23:219-229.

    Not in our library10.1177/0954008311399112

  30. 30.

    Hejčl A., Sedý J., Kapcalová M., Toro D.A., Amemori T., Lesný P., Likavcanová-Mašínová K., Krumbholcová E., Prádný M., Michálek J., et al. HPMA-RGD hydrogels seeded with mesenchymal stem cells improve functional outcome in chronic spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1535-1546.

    Not in our library10.1089/scd.2009.0378

  31. 31.

    Beamish J.A., Zhu J., Kottke-Marchant K., Marchant R.E. The effects of monoacrylated poly(ethylene glycol) on the properties of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels used for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2010;92:441-450.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32353

  32. 32.

    Zustiak S.P., Leach J.B. Hydrolytically degradable poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:1348-1357.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm100137q

  33. 33.

    Silva A.K.A., Richard C., Bessodes M., Scherman D., Merten O.-W. Growth factor delivery approaches in hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2008;10:9-18.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm801103c

  34. 34.

    Varghese S., Elisseeff J.H. Hydrogels for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2006;203:95-144.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Jiang Z., Hao J., You Y., Liu Y., Wang Z., Deng X. Biodegradable and thermoreversible hydrogels of poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (ε-caprolactone-co-glycolide)-poly (ethylene glycol) aqueous solutions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2008;87:45-51.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.31699

  36. 36.

    Deshmukh M., Singh Y., Gunaseelan S., Gao D., Stein S., Sinko P.J. Biodegradable poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels based on a self-elimination degradation mechanism. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6675-6684.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.021

  37. 37.

    Schmedlen R.H., Masters K.S., West J.L. Photocrosslinkable polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels that can be modified with cell adhesion peptides for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4325-4332.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00177-1

  38. 38.

    Ossipov D.A., Brännvall K., Forsberg-Nilsson K., Hilborn J. Formation of the first injectable poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel by mixing of functional PVA precursors. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007;106:60-70.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.26455

  39. 39.

    Higuchi A., Aoki N., Yamamoto T., Miyazaki T., Fukushima H., Tak T.M., Jyujyoji S., Egashira S., Matsuoka Y., Natori S.H. Temperature-induced cell detachment on immobilized pluronic surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2006;79:380-392.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.30773

  40. 40.

    Zhu J. Bioactive modification of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4639-4656.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044

  41. 41.

    Geckil H., Xu F., Zhang X., Moon S., Demirci U. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:469-484.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm.10.12

  42. 42.

    Matsumoto T., Isogawa Y., Tanaka T., Kondo A. Streptavidin-hydrogel prepared by sortase A-assisted click chemistry for enzyme immobilization on an electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018;99:56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.044

  43. 43.

    Ito F., Usui K., Kawahara D., Suenaga A., Maki T., Kidoaki S., Suzuki H., Taiji M., Itoh M., Hayashizaki Y., et al. Reversible hydrogel formation driven by protein-peptide-specific interaction and chondrocyte entrapment. Biomaterials. 2009;31:58-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.026

  44. 44.

    Ramirez M., Guan D., Ugaz V., Chen Z. Intein-triggered artificial protein hydrogels that support the immobilization of bioactive proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:5290.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja401075s

  45. 45.

    Krishna O.D., Kiick K.L. Protein- and peptide-modified synthetic polymeric biomaterials. Biopolymers. 2010;94:32-48.

    Not in our library10.1002/bip.21333

  46. 46.

    Pamfil D., Vasile C., Tarțău L., Vereștiuc L., Poieată A. pH-Responsive 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/citraconic anhydride-modified collagen hydrogels as ciprofloxacin carriers for wound dressings. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2017;32:355-381.

    Not in our library10.1177/0883911516684653

  47. 47.

    Dorwal D. Nanogels as Novel and versatile pharmaceutics. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012;4:67-74.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    Yadav H.K.S., Al Halabi N.A., Alsalloum G.A. Nanogels as Novel Drug Delivery Systems-A Review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Res. 2017;1:1-8.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    Tahara Y., Akiyoshi K. Current advances in self-assembled nanogel delivery systems for immunotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015;95:65-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.004

  50. 50.

    Bencherif S.A., Siegwart D.J., Srinivasan A., Horkay F., Hollinger J.O., Washburn N.R., Matyjaszewski K. Nanostructured hybrid hydrogels prepared by a combination of atom transfer radical polymerization and free radical polymerization. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5270-5278.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.011

  51. 51.

    Sahiner N., Godbey W.T., McPherson G.L., John V.T. Microgel, nanogel and hydrogel–hydrogel semi-IPN composites for biomedical applications: Synthesis and characterization. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2006;284:1121-1129.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00396-006-1489-4

  52. 52.

    Wu W., Zhou S. Hybrid micro-/nanogels for optical sensing and intracellular imaging. Nano Rev. 2010;1:5730.

    Not in our library10.3402/nano.v1i0.5730

  53. 53.

    Lohani A., Singh G., Sankar Bhattacharya S., Verma A. Interpenetrating Polymer Networks as Innovative Drug Delivery Systems. J. Drug Deliv. 2014;2014:583612.

    Not in our library10.1155/2014/583612

  54. 54.

    Hoare T.R., Kohane D.S. Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer. 2008;49:1993-2007.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027

  55. 55.

    Ebara M., Kotsuchibashi Y., Narain R., Idota N., Kim Y.J., Hoffman J.M., Uto K., Aoyagit T. Smart Biomaterials. 2014.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Amini A.A., Nair L.S. Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. Biomed. Mater. 2012;7:024105.

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-6041/7/2/024105

  57. 57.

    Jin R., Lin C. Chapter 2: In-Situ Forming Biomimetic Hydrogels for Tissue Regeneration. Biomedicine. 2012;35-58.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Augst A.D., Kong H.J., Mooney D.J. Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 2006;6:623-633.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200600069

  59. 59.

    Czarnecki S., Rossow T., Seiffert S. Hybrid Polymer-Network Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanical Response. Polymers. 2016;8:82.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym8030082

  60. 60.

    Sun J.-Y., Zhao X., Illeperuma W.R.K., Chaudhuri O., Oh K.H., Mooney D.J., Vlassak J.J., Suo Z. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature. 2012;489:133-136.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11409

  61. 61.

    Lin P., Ma S., Wang X., Zhou F. Molecularly engineered dual-crosslinked hydrogel with ultrahigh mechanical strength, toughness, and good self-recovery. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2054-2059.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201405022

  62. 62.

    Narita T., Mayumi K., Ducouret G., Hébraud P. Viscoelastic properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels having permanent and transient cross-links studied by microrheology, classical rheometry, and dynamic light scattering. Macromolecules. 2013;46:4174-4183.

    Not in our library10.1021/ma400600f

  63. 63.

    Kondo S., Hiroi T., Han Y.S., Kim T.H., Shibayama M., Chung U.I., Sakai T. Reliable hydrogel with mechanical “fuse link” in an aqueous environment. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:7407-7411.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201503130

  64. 64.

    Sletten E.M., Bertozzi C.R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: Fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:6974-6998.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200900942

  65. 65.

    Kopeček J., Yang J. Smart Self-Assembled Hybrid Hydrogel Biomaterials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:7396-7417.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201201040

  66. 66.

    Rodriguez L.M.D.L., Hemar Y., Cornish J., Brimble M.A. Structure–mechanical property correlations of hydrogel forming β-sheet peptides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:4797.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5cs00941c

  67. 67.

    Baker B.M., Chen C.S. Deconstructing the third dimension–how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:3015-3024.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.079509

  68. 68.

    Yang J., Xu C., Wang C., Kopeček J. Refolding hydrogels self-assembled from N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide graft copolymers by antiparallel coiled-coil formation. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1187-1195.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm051002k

  69. 69.

    Ren N., Sun R., Xia K., Zhang Q., Li W., Wang F., Zhang X., Ge Z., Wang L., Fan C., et al. DNA-Based Hybrid Hydrogels Sustain Water-Insoluble Ophthalmic Therapeutic Delivery against Allergic Conjunctivitis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:26704-26710.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b08652

  70. 70.

    Mundargi R.C., Patil S.A., Kulkarni P.V., Mallikarjuna N.N., Aminabhavi T.M. Sequential interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel microspheres of poly(methacrylic acid) and poly(vinyl alcohol) for oral controlled drug delivery to intestine. J. Microencapsul. 2008;25:228-240.

    Not in our library10.1080/02652040801896435

  71. 71.

    Liu X., Guo H., Zha L. Study of pH/temperature dual stimuli-responsive nanogels with interpenetrating polymer network structure. Polym. Int. 2012;61:1144-1150.

    Not in our library10.1002/pi.4192

  72. 72.

    Blackburn W.H., Dickerson E.B., Smith M.H., McDonald J.F., Lyon L.A. Peptide-Functionalized Nanogels for Targeted siRNA Delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009;20:960-968.

    Not in our library10.1021/bc800547c

  73. 73.

    Schachschal S., Balaceanu A., Melian C., Demco D.E., Eckert T., Richtering W., Pich A. Polyampholyte Microgels with Anionic Core and Cationic Shell. Macromolecules. 2010;43:4331-4339.

    Not in our library10.1021/ma100184h

  74. 74.

    Zhang W., Yao R., Tao W., He H., Shui S. Preparation of monodisperse HPMC/PAA hybrid nanogels via surfactant-free seed polymerization. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2013;292:317-324.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00396-013-3075-x

  75. 75.

    Nayak S., Lee H., Chmielewski J., Lyon L.A. Folate-Mediated Cell Targeting and Cytotoxicity Using Thermoresponsive Microgels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10258-10259.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja0474143

  76. 76.

    Dickerson E., Blackburn W., Smith M., Kapa L., Lyon L.A., McDonald J. Chemosensitization of cancer cells by siRNA using targeted nanogel delivery. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:10.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2407-10-10

  77. 77.

    Lapeyre V., Ancla C., Catargi B., Ravaine V. Glucose-responsive microgels with a core-shell structure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;327:316-323.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2008.08.039

  78. 78.

    Zieris A., Prokoph S., Levental K.R., Welzel P.B., Grimmer M., Freudenberg Y., Werner C. FGF-2 and VEGF functionalization of starPEG–heparin hydrogels to modulate biomolecular and physical cues of angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 2010;31:7985-7994.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.021

  79. 79.

    Jin R., Moreira Teixeira L.S., Krouwels A., Dijkstra P.J., van Blitterswijk C.A., Karperien M., Feijen J. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid–poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels via Michael addition: An injectable biomaterial for cartilage repair. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1968-1977.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.024

  80. 80.

    Li F., Griffith M., Li Z., Tanodekaew S., Sheardown H., Hakim M., Carlsson D.J. Recruitment of multiple cell lines by collagen-synthetic copolymer matrices in corneal regeneration. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3093-3104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.063

  81. 81.

    Nistor M.T., Vasile C., Tatia R., Chiriac A. Hybrid collagen/pNIPAAM hydrogel nanocomposites for tissue engineering application. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2018;296:1555-1571.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Nistor M.T., Chiriac A.P., Nita L.E., Vasile C. Characterization of the semi-interpenetrated network based on collagen and poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide-co-diethylene glycol diacrylate). Int. J. Pharm. 2013;452:92-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.043

  83. 83.

    Cheaburu C.N., Vasile C. Responsive freeze-drying interpolymeric associations of alginic acid and PNIPAM. II. Transition and temperature dependence on pH and composition. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2008;42:207-212.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    Radvar E., Azevedo H.S. Supramolecular Peptide/Polymer Hybrid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2019;19:1800221.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201800221

  85. 85.

    Vandermeulen G.W.M., Klok H.A. Peptide/protein hybrid materials: Enhanced control of structure and impropved performance through conjugation of biological and synthetic polymers. Macromol. Biosci. 2004;4:383-398.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200300079

  86. 86.

    Gulrez S.K.H., Al-Assaf S., Phillips G.O., Carpi A. Hydrogels: Methods of Preparation, Characterisation and Applications. Progress in Molecular and Environmental Bioengineering. Analysis and Modeling to Technology Applications. 2011.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    Khademhosseini A., Langer R. Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5087-5092.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.021

  88. 88.

    Barner-Kowollik C. Handbook of RAFT Polymerization. 2008.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Wang C., Kopeček J., Stewart R.J. Hybrid hydrogels crosslinked by genetically engineered coiled-coil block proteins. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:912-920.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm0155322

  90. 90.

    Lim S., Jung G.A., Muckom R.J., Glover D.J., Clark D.S. Engineering bioorthogonal protein–polymer hybrid hydrogel as a functional protein immobilization platform. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:806-809.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cc08720b

  91. 91.

    Sierra-Martin B., Fernandez-Barbero A. Multifunctional hybrid nanogels for theranostic applications. Soft Matter. 2015;14:8205-8216.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5sm01789k

  92. 92.

    Sanson N., Rieger J. Synthesis of nanogels/microgels by conventional and controlled radical crosslinking copolymerization. Polym. Chem. 2010;1:96577.

    Not in our library10.1039/c0py00010h

  93. 93.

    Kabanov A.V., Vinogradov S.V. Nanogels as pharmaceutical carriers: Finite networks of infinite capabilities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:5418-5429.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200900441

  94. 94.

    Wu H.Q., Wang C.C. Biodegradable smart nanogels: A new platform for targeting drug delivery and biomedical diagnostics. Langmuir. 2016;32:6211-6225.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00842

  95. 95.

    Karg M. Functional Materials Design through Hydrogel Encapsulation of Inorganic Nanoparticles: Recent Developments and Challenges. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016;217:242-255.

    Not in our library10.1002/macp.201500334

  96. 96.

    Eslami P., Rossi F., Fedeli S. Review Hybrid Nanogels: Stealth and Biocompatible Structures for Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:71.

    Not in our library10.3390/pharmaceutics11020071

  97. 97.

    Grover G.N., Rao N., Christman K.L. Myocardial Matrix-Polyethylene Glycol Hybrid Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:014011.

    Not in our library10.1088/0957-4484/25/1/014011

  98. 98.

    Foster J., Elnashar M. Chapter 12: PEGylation and BioPEGylation of Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Synthesis, Characterisation and Applications. Biopolymers. 2010;243-256.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    Jiang Y., Chen J., Deng C., Suuronen E.J., Zhong Z. Click hydrogels, microgels and nanogels: Emerging platforms for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4969-4985.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.001

  100. 100.

    Chirani N., Yahia L.H., Gritsch L., Motta F.L., Chirani S., Faré S. History and Applications of Hydrogels. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015;4:32.

    Not in our library10.4172/2254-609x.100013

  101. 101.

    Zhou M., Smith A.M., Das A.K., Hodson N.W., Collins R.F., Ulijn R.V., Gough J.E. Self-assembled peptide-based hydrogels as scaffolds for anchorage-dependent cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2523-2530.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.010

  102. 102.

    Palmese L.L., Thapa R.K., Sullivan M.O., Kiick K.L. Hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2019;24:143-157.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coche.2019.02.010

  103. 103.

    Bakarich S.E., Balding P., Gorkin R., Spinks G.M. Printed ioniccovalent entanglement hydrogels from carrageenan and an epoxy amine. RSC Adv. 2014;4:38088-38092.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ra07109c

  104. 104.

    Tan H., Marra K.G. Injectable, Biodegradable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials. 2010;3:1746-1767.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma3031746

  105. 105.

    Peppas N.A., Hilt J.Z., Khademhosseini A., Langer R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2006;18:1345-1360.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.200501612

  106. 106.

    Weber L.M., Lopez C.G., Anseth K.S. Effects of PEG hydrogel crosslinking density on protein diffusion and encapsulated islet survival and function. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2009;90:720-729.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32134

  107. 107.

    Fujioka-Kobayashi M., Ota M.S., Shimoda A., Nakahama K., Akiyoshi K., Miyamoto Y., Iseki S. Cholesteryl group- and acryloyl group-bearing pullulan nanogel to deliver BMP2 and FGF18 for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7613-7620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.075

  108. 108.

    Shimoda A., Chen Y., Akiyoshi K. Nanogel containing electrospun nanofibers as a platform for stable loading of proteins. RSC Adv. 2016;6:40811-40817.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ra05997j

  109. 109.

    Shimoda A., Sawada S.-i., Akiyoshi K., Prokop A., Iwasaki Y., Harada A. Intracellular protein delivery using self-assembled amphiphilic polysaccharide nanogels. Intracellular Delivery II: Fundamentals and Applications. 2014;265-274.

    Not in our library

  110. 110.

    Molinos M., Carvalho V., Silva D.M., Gama F.M. Development of a Hybrid Dextrin Hydrogel Encapsulating Dextrin Nanogel As Protein Delivery Systems. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:517-527.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm2015834

  111. 111.

    Lee S.C., Kwon I.K., Park K. Hydrogels for delivery of bioactive agents: A historical perspective. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013;65:17-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.015

  112. 112.

    Buwalda S.J., Boere K.W., Dijkstra P.J., Feijen J., Vermonden T., Hennink W.E. Hydrogels in a historical perspective: From simple networks to smart materials. J. Control. Release. 2014;190:254-273.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.052

  113. 113.

    Yom-Tov O., Neufeld L., Seliktar D., Bianco-Peled H. A novel design of injectable porous hydrogels with in situ pore formation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:4236-4246.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.006

  114. 114.

    Abebe D.G., Fujiwara T. Controlled thermoresponsive hydrogels by stereocomplexed PLA-PEG-PLAprepared via hybrid micelles of premixed copolymers with different PEG lengths. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:1828-1836.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm300325v

  115. 115.

    Sefton M.V., May M.H., Lahooti S., Babensee J.E. Making microencapsulation work: Conformal coating, immobilization gels and in vivo performance. J. Control. Release. 2000;65:173-186.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00234-5

  116. 116.

    Wang L., Guo S., Dong J., Cui J., Hao J. Microgels in biomaterials and nanomedicines. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;266:1-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cis.2019.01.005

  117. 117.

    Fu L.-H., Qi C., Ma M.-G., Wan P. Multifunctional cellulose-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2019;7:1541-1562.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8tb02331j

  118. 118.

    Ismail H., Irani M., Ahmad Z. Starch-based bydrogels: Present status and applications. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomat. 2013;62:411-420.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2012.719141

  119. 119.

    Sıvoli L., Perez E., Caraballo D., Rodrıguez J.P., Rodrıguez D., Moret J., Sojo F., Arvelo F., Tapia M., Colina M., et al. Cytocompatibility of a matrix of methylated cassava starch and chitosan. J. Cell Plast. 2013;49:507-520.

    Not in our library10.1177/0021955x13503843

  120. 120.

    Kara S., Tamerler C., Bermek H., Pekcan O. Cation effects on sol-gel and gel-sol phase transitions of κ-carrageenan-water system. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2003;31:177-185.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0141-8130(02)00080-6

  121. 121.

    Osmałek T., Froelich A., Tasarek S. Application of gellan gum in pharmacy and medicine. Int. J. Pharm. 2014;466:328-340.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.03.038

  122. 122.

    Anirudhan T.S., Rejeena S.R. Poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid)-grafted nanocellulose/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite for the in vitro gastrointestinal release of amoxicillin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014;131:40699.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.40699

  123. 123.

    Morales Hurtado M., de Vriesa E.G., Zeng X., van der Heide E. A tribo-mechanical analysis of PVA-based building-blocks for implementation in a 2D-layered skin model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016;62:319-332.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.001

  124. 124.

    Jiang P., Li G., Lv L., Ji H., Li Z., Chen S., Chu S. Effect of DMAEMA content and polymerization mode on morphologies and properties of pH and temperature double-sensitive cellulose-based hydrogels. J. Macromol. Sci. A. 2020;57:207-216.

    Not in our library10.1080/10601325.2019.1681899

  125. 125.

    Yang J., Han C.R. Mechanically viscoelastic properties of cellulose nanocrystals skeleton reinforced hierarchical composite hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:25621-25630.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.6b08834

  126. 126.

    Chen C., Li D., Abe K., Yano H. Formation of high strength double-network gels from cellulose nanofiber/polyacrylamide via NaOH gelation treatment. Cellulose. 2018;25:5089-5097.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10570-018-1938-5

  127. 127.

    Huang W., Wang Y., McMullen L.M., McDermott M.T., Deng H., Du Y., Chen L., Zhang L. Stretchable, tough, self-recoverable, and cytocompatible chitosan/cellulose nanocrystals/polyacrylamide hybrid hydrogels. Carbohyd. Polym. 2019;222:114977.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.114977

  128. 128.

    Pandey M., Mohamad N., Amin M.C.I.M. Bacterial cellulose/acrylamide pH-sensitive smart hydrogel: Development, characterization, and toxicity studies in ICR mice model. Mol. Pharm. 2014;11:3596-3608.

    Not in our library10.1021/mp500337r

  129. 129.

    Ahmad N., Amin M.C.I.M., Mahali S.M., Ismail I., Chuang V.T.G. Biocompatible and mucoadhesive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) for oral protein delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2014;11:4130-4142.

    Not in our library10.1021/mp5003015

  130. 130.

    Mohd Amin M.C.I., Ahmad N., Pandey M., Jue Xin C. Stimuli-responsive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for oral controlled release drug delivery. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2014;40:1340-1349.

    Not in our library10.3109/03639045.2013.819882

  131. 131.

    Hobzova R., Hrib J., Sirc J., Karpushkin E., Michalek J., Janouskova O., Gatenholm P. Embedding of bacterial cellulose nanofibers within PHEMA hydrogel matrices: Tunable stiffness composites with potential for biomedical applications. J. Nanomater. 2018;2018:5217095.

    Not in our library10.1155/2018/5217095

  132. 132.

    Dai L., Fang B., Liang C., Zeng R., Tu M., Zhao J. Preparation of bacterial cellulose/poly γ-glutamic acid composite hydrogels via 60Co γ-irradiation crosslinking and their properties. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;33:167-171.

    Not in our library10.16865/j.cnki.1000-7555.2017.07.029

  133. 133.

    Alosmanov R., Wolski K., Zapotoczny S. Grafting of thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) from wet bacterial cellulose sheets to improve its swelling drying ability. Cellulose. 2017;24:285-293.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10570-016-1120-x

  134. 134.

    Yang J.Y., Zhou X.S., Fang J. Synthesis and characterization of temperature sensitive hemicellulose-based hydrogels. Carbohyd. Polym. 2011;86:1113-1117.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.043

  135. 135.

    Bai Y., Zhang Z., Zhang A., Chen L., He C., Zhuang X., Chen X. Novel thermo- and pH-responsive hydroxypropyl cellulose- and poly (l-glutamic acid)-based microgels for oral insulin controlled release. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012;89:1207-1214.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.095

  136. 136.

    Li Q., Gong J., Zhang J. Rheological properties and microstructures of hydroxyethyl cellulose/poly(acrylic acid) blend hydrogels. J. Macromol. Sci. B. 2015;54:1132-1143.

    Not in our library10.1080/00222348.2015.1077300

  137. 137.

    Dutta S., Samanta P., Dhara D. Temperature, pH and redox responsive cellulose based hydrogels for protein delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;87:92-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.042

  138. 138.

    Dahlan N.A., Pushpamalar J., Veeramachineni A.K., Muniyandy S. Smart hydrogel of carboxymethyl cellulose grafted carboxymethyl polyvinyl alcohol and properties studied for future material applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2018;26:2061-2071.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10924-017-1105-3

  139. 139.

    Salama A., El-Sakhawy M., Kamel S. Carboxymethyl cellulose based hybrid material for sustained release of protein drugs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;93:1647-1652.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.029

  140. 140.

    Lee S., Park Y.H., Ki C.S. Fabrication of PEG-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel by thiol-norbornene photo-click Chemistry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;83:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.11.050

  141. 141.

    Lee S.Y., Bang S., Kim S., Jo S.Y., Kim B.-C., Hwang Y., Noh I. Synthesis and in vitro characterizations of porous carboxymethyl cellulose-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel film. Biomater. Res. 2015;19:12.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40824-015-0033-3

  142. 142.

    Bajpai S.K., Saxena S. Enzymatically degradable and pH-sensitive hydrogels for colon-targeted oral drug delivery. I. Synthesis and characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004;92:3630-3643.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.20283

  143. 143.

    Zhang X., Zhuo R. Synthesis of temperature-sensitive poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel with improved surface property. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;223:311-313.

    Not in our library10.1006/jcis.1999.6654

  144. 144.

    Zhang L.M., Wang G.H., Lu H.W. A new class of starch based hydrogels incorporating acrylamide and vinyl pyrrolidone: Effects of reaction variables on water sorption behavior. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2005;20:2005.

    Not in our library10.1177/0883911505055163

  145. 145.

    Li Y., Liu C., Tan Y., Xu K., Lu C., Wang P. In situ hydrogel constructed by starch-based nanoparticles via a Schiff base reaction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;110:87-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.058

  146. 146.

    Geresh S., Gilboa Y., Peisahov-Korol J., Gdalevsky G., Voorspoels J., Remon J.P., Kost J. Preparation and characterization of bioadhesive grafted starch copolymers as platforms for controlled drug delivery. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002;86:1157-1162.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.11058

  147. 147.

    Zhai M., Yoshii F., Kume T., Hashim K. Syntheses of PVA/Starch grafted hydrogels by irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002;50:295-303.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0144-8617(02)00031-0

  148. 148.

    Bhuniya S.P., Rahman S., Satyanand A.J., Gharia M.M., Dave A.M. Novel route to synthesis of allyl starch and biodegradable hydrogel by copolymerizing allyl-modified starch with methacrylic acid and acrylamide. J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2003;41:1650-1658.

    Not in our library10.1002/pola.10711

  149. 149.

    Saboktakin M.R., Maharramov A., Ramazanov M.A. pH-sensitive starch hydrogels via free radical graft copolymerization, synthesis and properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009;77:634-638.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.004

  150. 150.

    Seo S., Lee C.S., Jung Y.S., Na K. Thermo-sensitivity and triggered drug release of polysaccharide nanogels derived from pullulan-g-poly(L-lactide) copolymers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;87:1105-1111.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.061

  151. 151.

    Shitole A.A., Raut P.W., Khandwekar A., Sharma N., Baruah M. Design and engineering of polyvinyl alcohol based biomimetic hydrogels for wound healing and repair. J. Polym. Res. 2019;26:201.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-019-1874-6

  152. 152.

    Baron R.I., Culica M.E., Biliuta G., Bercea M., Gherman S., Zavastin D., Ochiuz L., Avadanei M., Coseri S. Physical hydrogels of oxidized polysaccharides and poly(vinyl alcohol) for wound dressing applications. Materials. 2019;12:1569.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12091569

  153. 153.

    Masci G., Bontempo D., Crescenzi V. Synthesis and characterization of thermoresponsive N-isopropylacrylamide/methacrylated pullulan hydrogels. Polymer. 2002;43:5587-5593.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00415-9

  154. 154.

    Asmarandei I., Fundueanu G., Cristea M., Harabagiu V., Constantin M. Thermo- and pH sensitive interpenetrating poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/carboxymethyl pullulan network for drug delivery. J. Polym. Res. 2013;20:293.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-013-0293-3

  155. 155.

    Morimoto N., Winnik F.M., Akiyoshi K. Botryoidal assembly of cholesteryl−pullulan/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanogels. Langmuir. 2007;23:217-223.

    Not in our library10.1021/la0616045

  156. 156.

    Akiyoshi K., Kang E.-C., Kurumada S., Sunamoto J., Principi T., Winnik F.M. Controlled association of amphiphilic polymers in water: Thermosensitive nanoparticles formed by self-assembly of hydrophobically modified pullulans and poly(Nisopropylacrylamides). Macromolecules. 2000;33:3244-3249.

    Not in our library10.1021/ma991798d

  157. 157.

    Hasegawa U., Sawada S., Shimizu T., Kishida T., Otsuji E., Mazda O., Akiyoshi K. Raspberry-like assembly of cross-linked nanogels for protein delivery. J. Control. Release. 2009;140:312-317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.025

  158. 158.

    Cinay G.E., Erkoc P., Alipour M., Hashimoto Y., Sasaki Y., Akiyoshi K., Kizilel S. Nanogel-integrated pH responsive composite hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017;3:370-380.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00670

  159. 159.

    Hashimoto Y., Mukai S., Sawada S., Sasaki Y., Akiyoshi K. Nanogel tectonic porous gel loading biologics, nanocarriers, and cells for advanced scaffold. Biomaterials. 2015;37:107-115.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.045

  160. 160.

    Liu Y., Zhu Y.-Y., Wei G., Lu W.-Y. Effect of carrageenan on poloxamer-based in situ gel for vaginal use: Improved in vitro and in vivo sustained-release properties. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;37:306-312.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2009.02.022

  161. 161.

    Zhang Y., Ye L., Cui M., Yang B., Li J., Sun H., Yao F. Physically crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol)-carrageenan composite hydrogels: Pore structure stability and cell adhesive ability. RSC Adv. 2015;5:78180-78191.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra11331h

  162. 162.

    Kawata K., Hanawa T., Endo N., Suzuki M., Oguchi T. Formulation study on retinoic acid gel composed of iota-carrageenan, polyethylene oxide and Emulgen®408. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012;60:825-830.

    Not in our library10.1248/cpb.c110500

  163. 163.

    Kulkarni R.V., Boppana R., Krishna Mohan G., Mutalik S., Kalyane N.V. pH-responsive interpenetrating network hydrogel beads of poly(acrylamide)-g-carrageenan and sodium alginate for intestinal targeted drug delivery: Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;367:509-517.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2011.10.025

  164. 164.

    Chan A.H., Boughton P.C., Ruys A.J., Oyen M.L. An interpenetrating network composite for a regenerative spinal disc application. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017;65:842-848.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.015

  165. 165.

    Chen J., Liu M., Jin S., Liu H. Synthesis and characterization of κ- carrageenan/poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) semi-interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels with rapid response to temperature. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008;17:395-418.

    Not in our library10.1002/pat.1184

  166. 166.

    Mohanan A., Vishalakshi B., Ganesh S. Swelling and diffusion characteristics of stimuli-responsive N-isopropylacrylamide and κ-carrageenan semi-IPN hydrogels. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomat. 2011;60:787-798.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2010.551364

  167. 167.

    Deng Y., Huang M., Sun D., Hou Y., Li Y., Dong T., Wang X., Zhang L., Yang W. Dual physically cross-linked κ-carrageenan-based double network hydrogels with superior self-healing performance for biomedical application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:37544-37554.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b15385

  168. 168.

    Bardajee G.R., Hooshyar Z., Rastgo F. Kappa carrageenan-g-poly (acrylic acid)/SPION nanocomposite as a novel stimuli-sensitive drug delivery system. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2013;291:2791-2803.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00396-013-3018-6

  169. 169.

    De Silva D.A., Hettiarachchi B.U., Nayanajith L.D.C., Milani M.D.Y., Motha J.T.S. Development of a PVP / kappa-carrageenan / PEG hydrogel dressing for wound healing applications in Sri Lanka. J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka. 2011;39:25-33.

    Not in our library10.4038/jnsfsr.v39i1.2920

  170. 170.

    Bakarich S.E., Pidcock G.C., Balding P., Stevens L., Calvert P., Panhuis M. Recovery from applied strain in interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels with ionic and covalent cross-links. Soft Matter. 2012;8:9985-9988.

    Not in our library10.1039/c2sm26745d

  171. 171.

    Kim H.S., Kim D., Jeong Y.W., Choi M.J., Lee G.W., Thangavelu M., Song J.E., Khang G. Engineering retinal pigment epithelial cells regeneration for transplantation in regenerative medicine using PEG/Gellan gum hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;130:220-228.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.078

  172. 172.

    Li W., Wu D., Hu D., Zhu S., Pan C., Jiao Y., Li L., Luo B., Zhou C., Lu L. Stress-relaxing double-network hydrogel for chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C. 2020;107:110333.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2019.110333

  173. 173.

    Choi J.H., Choi O.K., Lee J., Noh J., Lee S., Park A., Rim M.A., Reis R.L., Khang G. Evaluation of double network hydrogel of poloxamer-heparin/gellan gum for bone marrow stem cells delivery carrier. Colloid Surf. B. 2019;181:879-889.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.041

  174. 174.

    Agnihotri S.A., Aminabhavi T.M. Development of novel interpenetrating network gellan gum-poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel microspheres for the controlled release of carvedilol. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2005;31:491-503.

    Not in our library10.1080/03639040500215875

  175. 175.

    Hamcerencu M., Desbrieres J., Khoukh A., Popa M., Riess G. Synthesis and characterization of new unsaturated esters of gellan gum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008;71:92-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.021

  176. 176.

    Hamcerencu M., Desbrieres J., Popa M., Riess G. Thermo-sensitive gellan maleate/N-isopropylacrylamide hydrogels: Initial “in vitro” and “in vivo” evaluation as ocular inserts. Polym. Bull. 2020;77:741-755.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00289-019-02772-5

  177. 177.

    Sahraro M., Barikani M., Daemi H. Mechanical reinforcement of Gellan gum polyelectrolyte hydrogels by cationic polyurethane soft nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;187:102-109.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.028

  178. 178.

    Wu M., Bao B., Yoshii F., Makuuchi K. Irradiation of crosslinked, poly(vinyl alcohol) blended hydrogel for wound dressing. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2001;250:391-395.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1017988822121

  179. 179.

    Dadoo N., Landry S.B., Bomar J.D., Gramlich W.M. Synthesis and spatiotemporal modification of biocompatible and stimuli-responsive carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels using thiol-norbornene chemistry. Macromol. Biosci. 2017;17:589-599.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201700107

  180. 180.

    Constantin M., Bucatariu S., Stoica I., Fundueanu G. Smart nanoparticles based on pullulan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) for controlled delivery of indomethacin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017;94:698-708.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.064

  181. 181.

    Jayaramudu T., Raghavendra G.M., Varaprasad K., Sadiku R., Ramam K., Raju K.M. Iota-Carrageenan-based biodegradable Ag0 nanocomposite hydrogels for the inactivation of bacteria. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;95:188-194.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.075

  182. 182.

    Lee K.Y., Mooney D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37:106-126.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003

  183. 183.

    Newsom J.P., Payne K.A., Krebs M.D. Microgels: Modular, tunable constructs for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;88:32-41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.011

  184. 184.

    Piras C.C., Slavik P., Smith D.K. Self-Assembling Supramolecular Hybrid Hydrogel Beads, Supramolecular Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:853-859.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201911404

  185. 185.

    Vieira V.M.P., Hay L.L., Smith D.K. Multi-component hybrid hydrogels – understanding the extent of orthogonal assembly and its impact on controlled release. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:6981-6990.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7sc03301j

  186. 186.

    Passemard S., Szabó L., Noverraz F., Montanari E., Gonelle-Gispert C., Bühler L.H., Wandrey C., Gerber-Lemaire S. Synthesis Strategies to Extend the Variety of Alginate-Based Hybrid Hydrogels for Cell Microencapsulation. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18:2747-2755.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00665

  187. 187.

    Chaterji S., Kwon I.K., Park K. Smart polymeric gels: Redefining the limits of biomedical devices. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007;32:1083-1122.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.018

  188. 188.

    Ahmadi F., Oveisi Z., Samani M., Amoozgar Z. Chitosan based hydrogels: Characteristics and pharmaceutical applications. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2015;10:1-16.

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    Chen C., Liu L., Huang T., Wang Q., Fang Y.E. Bubble template fabrication of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) sponges for wound dressing applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;62:188-193.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.08.042

  190. 190.

    Fraser J.R.E., Laurent T.C., Laurent U.B.G. Hyaluronan: Its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J. Intern. Med. 1997;242:27-33.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x

  191. 191.

    Lam J., Truong N.F., Segura T. Design of cell-matrix interactions in hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1571-1580.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.025

  192. 192.

    Kim K.O., Akada Y., Kai W., Kim B.S., Kim I.S. Cells Attachment Property of PVA Hydrogel Nanofibers Incorporating Hyaluronic Acid for Tissue Engineering. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2011;2:353-360.

    Not in our library10.4236/jbnb.2011.24044

  193. 193.

    Benoit D.S., Durney A.R., Anseth K.S. The effect of heparin-functionalized PEG hydrogels on three-dimensional human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials. 2007;28:66-77.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.033

  194. 194.

    Slaughter B.V., Khurshid S.S., Fisher O.Z., Khademhosseini A., Peppas N.A. Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2009;21:3307-3329.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.200802106

  195. 195.

    Skilling K.J., Citossi F., Bradshaw T.D., Ashford M., Kellam B., Marlow M. Insights into low molecular mass organic gelators: A focus on drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Soft Matter. 2014;10:237-256.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3sm52244j

  196. 196.

    Cho S.H., Oh S.H., Lee J.H. Fabrication and characterization of porous alginate/polyvinyl alcohol hybrid scaffolds for 3D cell culture. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2005;16:933-947.

    Not in our library10.1163/1568562054414658

  197. 197.

    Kim J.O., Park J.K., Kim J.H., Jin S.G., Yonga C.S., Li D.X., Choi J.Y., Woo J.S., Yoo B.K., Lyoo W.S., et al. Development of polyvinyl alcohol–sodium alginate gel matrix-based wound dressing system containing nitrofurazone. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;359:79-86.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.03.021

  198. 198.

    Kim J.O., Choi J.Y., Park J.K., Kim J.H., Jin S.G., Chang S.W., Li D.X., Hwang M.-R., Woo J.S., Kim J.-A., et al. Development of Clindamycin-Loaded Wound Dressing with Polyvinyl Alcohol and Sodium Alginate. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008;31:2277-2282.

    Not in our library10.1248/bpb.31.2277

  199. 199.

    Stone S.A., Gosavi P., Athauda T.J., Ozer R.R. In situ citric acid crosslinking of alginate/polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibers. Mater. Lett. 2013;112:32-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.100

  200. 200.

    Tarun K., Gobi N. Calcium alginate/PVA blended nano fiber matrix for wound dressing. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2012;37:127-132.

    Not in our library

  201. 201.

    Kumar A., Negi Y.S., Choudhary V., Bhardwaj N.K. Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals Produced by Acid-Hydrolysis from Sugarcane Bagasse as Agro-Waste. J. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2014;2:1-8.

    Not in our library

  202. 202.

    Kumar A., Lee Y., Kim D., Rao K.M., Kim J., Park S., Haider A., Lee D.H., Han S.S. Effect of crosslinking functionality on microstructure, mechanical properties, and in vitro cytocompatibility of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate hybrid scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017;95:962-973.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.085

  203. 203.

    Anjum F., Lienemann P.S., Metzger S., Biernaskie J., Kallos M.S., Ehrbar M. Enzyme responsive GAG-based natural-synthetic hybrid hydrogel for tunable growth factor delivery and stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 2016;87:104-117.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.050

  204. 204.

    Zhao L., Gwon H.-J., Lim Y.-M., Nho Y.-C., Kim S.Y. Hyaluronic acid/chondroitin sulfate-based hydrogel prepared by gamma irradiation technique. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;102:598-605.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.048

  205. 205.

    Huang X., Brazel C.S. Review On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release. 2001;73:121-136.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00248-6

  206. 206.

    El-Salmawi K.M. Gamma radiation-induced crosslinked PVA/chitosan blends for wound dressing. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A: Pure Appl. Chem. 2007;44:541-545.

    Not in our library10.1080/10601320701235891

  207. 207.

    Yang X., Liu Q., Chen X., Yu F., Zhu Z. Investigation of PVA/ws-chitosan hydrogels prepared by combined gama-irradiation and freeze–thawing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008;73:401-408.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.12.008

  208. 208.

    Yang X., Yang K., Wu S., Chen X., Yu F., Li J., Ma M., Zhu Z. Cytotoxicity and wound healing properties of PVA/ws Chitosan/glycerol hydrogels made by irradiation followed by freeze–thawing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2010;79:606-611.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.12.017

  209. 209.

    Jiang Y., Meng X., Wu Z., Qi X. Modified chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel enables sustained and efficient anti-tumor therapy via intratumoral injection. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016;144:245-253.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.059

  210. 210.

    Yang J.M., Su W.Y., Leu T.L., Yang M.C. Evaluation of chitosan/PVA blended hydrogel membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004;236:39-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.005

  211. 211.

    Sung J.H., Hwang M.R., Kim J.O., Lee J.H., Kim Y.I., Kim J.H., Change S.W., Jin S.G., Kim J.A., Lyoo W.S., et al. Gel characterization and in vivo evaluation of minocycline-loaded wound dressing with enhanced wound healing using polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan. Int. J. Pharm. 2010;392:232-240.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.024

  212. 212.

    Zu Y., Zhang Y., Zhao X., Shan C., Zu S., Wang K., Li Y., Ge Y. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan–polyvinyl Alcohol Blend Hydrogels for the Controlled Release of Nano-Insulin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012;50:82-87.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.10.006

  213. 213.

    Charernsriwilaiwat N., Rojanarata T., Ngawhirunpat T., Opanasopit P. Electrospun Chitosan/polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofibre Mats for Wound Healing. Int. Wound J. 2014;11:215-222.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01077.x

  214. 214.

    Shamloo A., Sarmadi M., Aghababaie Z., Vossoughi M. Accelerated full-thickness wound healing via sustained bFGF delivery based on a PVA/chitosan/gelatin hydrogel incorporating PCL microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 2018;537:278-289.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.12.045

  215. 215.

    Fan L., Yang H., Yang J., Peng M., Hu J. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/gelatin/PVA Hydrogel for Wound Dressings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016;146:427-434.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.002

  216. 216.

    Tsai R.-Y., Kuo T.-Y., Hung S.-C., Lin C.-M., Hsien T.-Y., Wang D.-M., Hsieh H.-J. Use of Gum Arabic to Improve the Fabrication of Chitosan–gelatin-based Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;115:525-532.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.108

  217. 217.

    Rodriguez-Rodriguez R., Garcia-Carvajal Z., Jimenez-Palomar I., Jimenez-Avalos J., Espinosa-Andrews H. Development of Gelatin/chitosan/PVA Hydrogels: Thermal stability, water state, viscoelasticity, and cytotoxicity assays. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018;136:47149.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.47149

  218. 218.

    Khan F., Tare R.S., Oreffo R.O.C., Bradley M. Versatile biocompatible polymer hydrogels: Scaffolds for cell growth. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:978-982.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200804096

  219. 219.

    Bhattarai N., Ramay H.R., Gunn J., Matsen F.A., Zhang M.Q. PEG-grafted chitosan as an injectable thermosensitive hydrogel for sustained protein release. J. Control. Release. 2005;103:609-624.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.12.019

  220. 220.

    Bhattarai N., Gunn J., Zhang M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010;62:83-99.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.019

  221. 221.

    Hong Y., Gong Y., Gao C., Shen J. Collagen-coated polylactide microcarriers/chitosan hydrogel composite: Injectable scaffold for cartilage regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2008;85:628-637.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.31603

  222. 222.

    Sadeghi A., Moztarzadeh F., Mohandesi J.A. Investigating the effect of chitosan on hydrophilicity and bioactivity of conductive electrospun composite scaffold for neural tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;121:625-632.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.022

  223. 223.

    Elcin Y.M., Dixit V., Gitnick G. Hepatocyte attachment on biodegradable modified chitosan membranes: In vitro evaluation for the development of liver organoids. Artif. Organs. 1998;22:837-846.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06182.x

  224. 224.

    Zhao L., Mitomo H., Zhai M., Yoshii F., Nagasawa N., Kume T. Synthesis of Antibacterial PVA/CM-chitosan Blend Hydrogels with Electron Beam Irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003;53:439-446.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0144-8617(03)00103-6

  225. 225.

    Afshari M.J., Sheikh N., Afarideh H. PVA/CM-chitosan/honey hydrogels prepared by using the combined technique of irradiation followed by freeze-thawing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015;113:28-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.023

  226. 226.

    Xiao C., Zhou G. Synthesis and properties of degradable poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003;81:297-301.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0141-3910(03)00100-9

  227. 227.

    Ignatova M., Starbova K., Manolova N., Rashkov I. Electrospun nano-fibre mats with antibacterial properties from quaternized chitosan and poly(vinyl alcohol). Carbohydr. Res. 2006;341:2098-2107.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carres.2006.05.006

  228. 228.

    Zhao X., Li P., Guo B., Ma P.X. Antibacterial and conductive injectable hydrogels based on quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline/oxidized dextran for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:236-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.006

  229. 229.

    Fan L., Yang J., Wu H., Hu Z., Yi J., Tong J., Zhu X. Preparation and Characterization of Quaternary Ammonium Chitosan Hydrogel with Significant Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015;79:830-836.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.013

  230. 230.

    Kim S., Cui Z.K., Kim P.J., Jung L.Y., Lee M. Design of hydrogels to stabilize and enhance bone morphogenetic protein activity by heparin mimetics. Acta Biomater. 2018;72:45-54.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.034

  231. 231.

    Ding C.X., Liu F.Y., Cheng J., Gu J.X., Dan S., Liu C.Y., Qu X.Z., Yang Z.Z. Dually responsive injectable hydrogel prepared by in situ cross-linking of glycol chitosan and benzaldehyde-capped PEO-PPO-PEO. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:1043-1051.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm1000179

  232. 232.

    Park K.M., Lee S.Y., Joung Y.K., Na J.S., Lee M.C., Park K.D. Thermosensitive chitosan–Pluronic hydrogel as an injectable cell delivery carrier for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1956-1965.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.040

  233. 233.

    Kim J.Y., Choi W.I., Kim Y.H., Tae G. Brain-targeted delivery of protein using chitosan- and RVG peptide-conjugated, pluronic-based nano-carrier. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1170-1178.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.047

  234. 234.

    Choi J.S., Yoo H.S. Pluronic/chitosan hydrogels containing epidermal growth factor with wound-adhesive and photo-crosslinkable properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2010;95:564-573.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32848

  235. 235.

    Farahani B.V., Ghasemzaheh H., Afraz S. Intelligent semi-IPN chitosan-PEG-PAAm hydrogel for closed-loop insulin delivery and kinetic modeling. RSC Adv. 2016;6:26590-26598.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra28188a

  236. 236.

    Li Q., Williams C.G., Sun D.D.N., Wang J., Leong K., Elisseeff J.H.J. Photocrosslinkable polysaccharides based on chondroitin sulfate. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2004;68:28-33.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.20007

  237. 237.

    Zhang C., Dong Q., Liang K., Zhou D., Yang H., Liu X., Xu W., Zhou Y., Xiao P. Photopolymerizable thiol-acrylate maleiated hyaluronic acid/thiol-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels as potential in-situ formable scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;119:270-277.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.153

  238. 238.

    Sharma B., Williams C.G., Khan M., Manson P., Elisseeff J.H. In vivo Chondrogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Photopolymerized Hydrogel. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007;119:112-120.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.prs.0000236896.22479.52

  239. 239.

    Bae K.H., Yoon J.J., Park T.G. Fabrication of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Beads for Cell Encapsulation. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006;22:297-302.

    Not in our library10.1021/bp050312b

  240. 240.

    Vignesh S., Sivashanmugam A., Mohandas A., Janarthanan R., Iyer S., Nair S.V., Jayakumar R. Injectable deferoxamine nanoparticles loaded chitosan–hyaluronic acid coacervate hydrogel for therapeutic angiogenesis. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2018;161:129-138.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.033

  241. 241.

    Na K., Kim S., Woo D.G., Sun B.K., Yang H.N., Chung H.M., Park K.H. Combination material delivery of dexamethasone and growth factor in hydrogel blended with hyaluronic acid constructs for neocartilage formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2007;83:779-786.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.31374

  242. 242.

    Leone G., Consumi M., Lamponi S., Bonechi C., Tamassi G., Donati A., Rossi C., Magnani A. Hybrid PVA-xanthan gum hydrogels as nucleus pulposus substitutes. Int. J. Polym. Materi. Polym. Biomater. 2018;68:681-690.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2018.1482468

  243. 243.

    Elizalde-Peña E.A., Zarate-Triviño D.G., Nuño-Donlucas S.M., Medina-Torres L., Gough J.E., Sanchez I.C., Villaseñor F., Luna-Barcenas G. Synthesis and characterization of a hybrid (chitosan-g-glycidyl methacrylate)–xanthan hydrogel. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2013;24:1426-1442.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2013.763526

  244. 244.

    Shah S.S., Kim M., Cahill-Thompson K., Tae G., Revzin A. Micropatterning of bioactive heparin-based hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2011;7:3133-3140.

    Not in our library10.1039/c0sm00771d

  245. 245.

    Kim M., Shin Y., Hong B.-H., Kim Y.-J., Chun J.-S., Tae G., Kim Y.H. In vitro Chondrocyte Culture in a Heparin-Based Hydrogel for Cartilage Regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part C: Meth. 2009;16:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0548

  246. 246.

    Kim M., Lee J.Y., Jones C.N., Revzin A., Tae G. Heparin-based hydrogel as a matrix for encapsulation and cultivation of primary hepatocytes. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3596-3603.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.068

  247. 247.

    Goh M.C., Hwang Y., Tae G. Epidermal growth factor loaded heparin-based hydrogel sheet for skin wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016;147:251-260.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.072

  248. 248.

    Xu H.-L., Tian F.-R., Xiao J., Chen P.-P., Xu J., Fan Z.-L., Yang J.-J., Lu C.-T., Zhao Y.-Z. Sustained-release of FGF-2 from a hybrid hydrogel of heparin-poloxamer and decellular matrix promotes the neuroprotective effects of proteins after spinal injury. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018;13:681-694.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s152246

  249. 249.

    Ahmed S., Annu A.A., Sheikh J. A review on chitosan centred scaffolds and their applications in tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;116:849-862.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.176

  250. 250.

    Martins J.G., Camargo S.E.A., Bishop T.T., Popat K.C., Kipper M.J., Martins A.F. Pectin-chitosan membrane scaffold imparts controlled stem cell adhesion and proliferation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;197:47-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.062

  251. 251.

    Tiwari S., Patil R., Bahadur P. Polysaccharide based scaffolds for soft tissue engineering applications. Polymers. 2019;11:1.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym11010001

  252. 252.
  253. 253.

    Qasim S.B., Husain S., Huang Y., Pogorielov M., Deineka V., Lyndin M., Rawlinson A., Rehman I.U. In vitro and in vivo Degradation Studies of Freeze Gelated Porous Chitosan Composite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017;136:31-38.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.11.018

  254. 254.

    Pok S., Myers J.D., Madihally S.V., Jacot J.G. A multilayered scaffold of a chitosan and gelatin hydrogel supported by a PCL core for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5630-5642.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.032

  255. 255.

    Negishi J., Nam K., Kimura T., Hashimoto Y., Funamoto S., Higami T., Fujisato S., Kishida A. Fabrication of a heparin–PVA complex hydrogel for application as a vascular access. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2014;102:1426-1433.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.33121

  256. 256.

    Homandberg G.A., Hui F., Wen C., Kuettner K.E., Williams J.M. Hyaluronic acid suppresses fibronectin fragment mediated cartilage chondrolysis: I. In vitro. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 1997;5:309-319.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1063-4584(97)80035-0

  257. 257.

    Shimazu A., Jikko A., Iwamoto M., Koike T., Yan W., Okada Y., Shinmei M., Nakamura S., Kato Y. Effects of hyaluronic acid on the release of proteoglycan from the cell matrix in rabbit chondrocyte cultures in the presence and absence of cytokines. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:247-253.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.1780360217

  258. 258.

    Morris E.A., Wilcon S., Treadwell B.V. Inhibition of interleukin 1-mediated proteoglycan degradation in bovine articular cartilage explants by addition of sodium hyaluronate. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992;53:1977-1982.

    Not in our library

  259. 259.

    Balakrishnan B., Banerjee R. Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:4453-4474.

    Not in our library10.1021/cr100123h

  260. 260.

    Fan H., Hu Y., Zhang C., Li X., Lv R., Qin L., Zhu R. Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and a PLGA-gelatin/chondroitin/hyaluronate hybrid scaffold. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4573-4580.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.013

  261. 261.

    Bichara D.A., Zhao X., Hwang N.S., Bodugoz-Senturk H., Yaremchuk M.J., Randolph M.A., Muratoglu O.K. Porous Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Alginate Gel Hybrid Construct for Neocartilage Formation Using Human Nasoseptal Cells. J. Surg. Res. 2010;163:331-336.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.070

  262. 262.

    Kunisch E., Knauf A.-K., Hesse E., Freudenberg U., Werner C., Bothe F. StarPEG/heparin-hydrogel based in vivo engineering of stable bizonal cartilage with a calcified bottom layer. Biofabrication. 2018;11:015001.

    Not in our library10.1088/1758-5090/aae75a

  263. 263.

    Tan H., Ramirez C.M., Miljkovic N., Li H., Rubin J.P., Marra K.G. Thermosensitive injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for adipose tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6844-6853.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.058

  264. 264.

    Lin Y.-K., Chen K.-H., Kuan C.-Y. The synthesis and characterization of a thermally responsive hyaluronic acid/Pluronic copolymer and an evaluation of its potential as an artificial vitreous substitute. J. Bioact. Compat. Pol. 2013;28:355-367.

    Not in our library10.1177/0883911513491181

  265. 265.
  266. 266.

    Tseng T.C., Tao L., Hsieh F.Y., Wei Y., Chiu I.M., Hsu S.H. An injectable, self-healing hydrogel to repair the central nervous system. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:3518-3524.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201500762

  267. 267.

    Hsieh F.-Y., Tao L., Wei Y., Hsu S.H. A novel biodegradable self healing hydrogel to induce blood capillary formation. Npg Asia Mater. 2017;9:e363.

    Not in our library10.1038/am.2017.23

  268. 268.

    Fares M.M., Sani E.S., Lara R.P., Oliveira R.B., Khademhosseini A., Annabi N. Interpenetrating network gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and pectin-g-PCL hydrogels with tunable properties for tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 2018;6:2938-2950.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8bm00474a

  269. 269.

    Niu R., Qin Z., Ji F., Xu M., Tian X., Li J., Yao F. Hybrid pectin-Fe3+/polyacrylamide double network hydrogels with excellent strength, high stiffness, superior toughness and notch-insensitivity. Soft Matter. 2017;13:9237-9245.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7sm02005h

  270. 270.

    Temenoff J.S., Mikos A.G. Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2405-2412.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00108-3

  271. 271.
  272. 272.
  273. 273.

    Chircov C., Grumezescu A.M., Bejenaru L.E. Hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2018;59:71-76.

    Not in our library

  274. 274.

    Baican M., Vasile C., Deepak P., Bhuvanesh G. Chitosan containing biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Advances in Polymers for Biomedical Applications. 2018;221-279.

    Not in our library

  275. 275.

    Jayakumar R., Prabaharan M., Sudheesh Kumar P.T., Nair S.V., Tamura H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29:322-337.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005

  276. 276.

    Fahmy A., Kamoun E.A., El-Eisawy R., El-Fakharany E.M., Taha T.H., El-Damhougy B.K., Abdelhai F. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-hyaluronic acid membranes for wound dressing applications: Synthesis and in vitro bio-evaluations. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2015;26:1466-1474.

    Not in our library10.5935/0103-5053.20150115

  277. 277.

    Phuc D.H., Hiep N.T., Phuc Chau N.D., Hoai N.T.T., Khon H.C., Toi V.V., Hai N.D., Bao B.C. Fabrication of hyaluronan-poly(vinylphosphonic acid)-chitosan hydrogel for wound healing application. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016;2016:6723716.

    Not in our library

  278. 278.

    Hoffman A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002;54:3-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3

  279. 279.

    Hamedi H., Moradi S., Hudson S.M., Tonelli A.E. Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;199:445-460.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.114

  280. 280.

    Wu J., Wei W., Wang L.Y., Su Z.G., Ma G.H. A thermosensitive hydrogel based on quaternized chitosan and poly(ethylene glycol) for nasal drug delivery system. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2220-2232.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.024

  281. 281.

    Dyer A.M., Hinchcliffe M., Watts P., Castile J., Jabbal-Gill I., Nankervis R., Smith A., Illum L. Nasal delivery of insulin using novel chitosan based formulations: A comparative study in two animal models between simple chitosan formulations and chitosan nanoparticles. Pharm. Res. 2002;19:998-1008.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1016418523014

  282. 282.

    Buranachai T., Praphairaksit N., Muangesin N. Chitosan/polyethylene glycol beads crosslinked with tripolyphosphate and glutaraldehyde for gasterointestinal drug delivery. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2010;11:1128-1137.

    Not in our library10.1208/s12249-010-9483-z

  283. 283.

    Hassani N.A., Abdouss M., Faghihi S. Synthesis and evaluation of PEG-O-chitosan nanoparticles for delivery of poor water soluble drugs: Lbuprofen. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014;41:91-99.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.035

  284. 284.

    Ito T., Yoshida C., Murakami Y. Design of novel sheet-shaped chitosan hydrogel for wound healing: A hybrid biomaterial consisting of both PEG-grafted chitosan and crosslinkable polymeric micelles acting as drug containers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013;33:3697-3703.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.056

  285. 285.

    Chan P., Kurisawa M., Chung J.E., Yang Y.Y. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-g-poly (ethylene glycol)-folate as a non-viral carrier for tumor-targeted gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2007;28:540-549.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.046

  286. 286.

    Patel V., Amiji M. Preparation and characterization of freeze-dried chitosan-poly (ethylene oxide) hydrogels for site-specific antibiotic delivery in the stomach. Pharm. Res. 1996;13:588-593.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1016054306763

  287. 287.

    Gong S., Tu H., Zheng H., Xu H., Yin Y. Chitosan-g-PAA hydrogels for colon-specific drug delivery: Preparation, swelling behavior and in vitro degradability. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2010;25:248-251.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11595-010-2248-4

  288. 288.

    Zhou T., Xiao C., Fan J., Chen S., Shen J., Wu W., Zhou S. A nanogel of on-site tunable pH-response for efficient anticancer drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:4546-4557.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.017

  289. 289.

    Åhlén M., Tummala G.K., Mihranyan A. Nanoparticle-loaded hydrogels as a pathway for enzymetriggered drug release in ophthalmic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2018;536:73-81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.053

  290. 290.

    Jamal A., Shahzadi L., Ahtzaz S., Zahid S., Chaudhry A.A., Rehman I.U., Yar M. Identification of anti-cancer potential of doxazocin: Loading into chitosan based biodegradable hydrogels for on-site delivery to treat cervical cancer. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018;82:102-109.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.054

  291. 291.

    Islam A., Yasin T. Controlled Delivery of Drug from pH Sensitive Chitosan/poly (vinyl Alcohol) Blend. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012;88:1055-1060.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.070

  292. 292.

    Yang L., Li Y.S., Gou Y.Z., Wang X., Zhao X.M., Tao L. Improving tumor chemotherapy effect using an injectable self-healing hydrogel as drug carrier. Polym. Chem. 2017;8:3071-3076.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7py00112f

  293. 293.

    Wang J.Y., Wang D., Yan H., Tao L., Wei Y., Li Y., Wang X., Zhao W., Zhang Y., Zhao L., et al. An injectable ionic hydrogel inducing high temperature hyperthermia for microwave tumor ablation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:4110-4120.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7tb00556c

  294. 294.

    Luckanagul J.A., Pitakchatwong C., Bhuket P.R.N., Muangnoi C., Rojsitthisak P., Chirachanchai S., Wang Q., Rojsitthisak P. Chitosan-based polymer hybrids for thermo-responsive nanogel delivery of curcumin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;181:1119-1127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.027

  295. 295.

    Luo Z., Xue K., Zhang X., Lim J.Y.C., Lai X., Young D.J., Zhang Z.-X., Wu Y.-L., Loh X.J. Thermogelling chitosan-based polymers for the treatment of oral mucosa ulcers. Biomater. Sci. 2020;8:1364-1379.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9bm01754b

  296. 296.

    Lee J., Cha M.-J., Lim K.S., Kim J.-K., Lee S.-K., Kim Y.-H., Hwang K.-C., Lee K.Y. Injectable microsphere/hydrogel hybrid system containing heat shock protein as therapy in a murine myocardial infarction model. J. Drug Target. 2013;21:822-829.

    Not in our library10.3109/1061186x.2013.829072

  297. 297.

    Dumitriu R.P., Oprea A.M., Vasile C. A drug delivery system based on stimuli-responsive alginate/N-isopropylacryl amide hydrogel. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2009;43:251-262.

    Not in our library

  298. 298.

    Chen Y.-Y., Wu H.-C., Sun J.-S., Dong G.-C., Wang T.-W. Injectable and thermoresponsive self-assembled nanocomposite hydrogel for long-term anticancer drug delivery. Langmuir. 2013;29:3721-3729.

    Not in our library10.1021/la400268p

  299. 299.

    Fujita S., Hara S., Hosono A., Sugihara S., Uematsu H., Suye S. Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Crosslinked with Complementary DNAs. Hindawi Adv. Polym. Technol. 2020;2020:1470819.

    Not in our library10.1155/2020/1470819

  300. 300.

    Roberts J.J., Farrugia B.L., Green R.A., Kovacina J.R., Martens P.J. In situ formation of poly(vinyl alcohol)–heparin hydrogels for mild encapsulation and prolonged release of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Tissue Eng. 2016;7:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1177/2041731416677132

  301. 301.

    He C., Ji H., Qian Y., Wang Q., Liu X., Zhao W., Zhao C. Heparin-based and heparin-inspired hydrogels: Size-effect, gelation and biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2019;7:1186-1208.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8tb02671h

  302. 302.
  303. 303.

    Ma X., Sun X., Chen J., Lei Y. Natural or Natural-Synthetic Hybrid Polymer-Based Fluorescent Polymeric Materials for Bio-imaging-Related Applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017;183:461-487.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12010-017-2570-9

  304. 304.

    Liu Z., Tang Z., Zhu L., Lu S., Chen F., Tang C., Sun H., Yang J., Qin G., Chen Q. Natural protein-based hydrogels with high strength and rapid self-recovery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;141:108-116.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.258

  305. 305.

    Chen J., Cai Z., Wei Q., Wang D., Wu J., Tan Y., Lu J., Ai H. Proanthocyanidin-crosslinked collagen/konjac glucomannan hydrogel with improved mechanical properties and MRI trackable biodegradation for potential tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Chem. B. 2020;8:316-331.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9tb02053e

  306. 306.

    Eslahi N., Simchi A., Mehrjoo M., Shokrgozar M.A., Bonakdar S. Hybrid cross-linked hydrogels based on fibrous protein/block copolymers and layered silicate nanoparticles: Tunable thermosensitivity, biodegradability and mechanical durability. RSC Adv. 2016;6:62944.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ra08563f

  307. 307.

    Pamfil D., Schick C., Vasile C. New Hydrogels Based on Substituted Anhydride Modified Collagen and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate. Synthesis and Characterization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014;53:11239-11248.

    Not in our library10.1021/ie5016848

  308. 308.

    Lotz C., Schmid F.F., Oechsle E., Monaghan M., Walles H., Groeber-Becker F.K. A Crosslinked Collagen Hydrogel Matrix Resisting Contraction to Facilitate Full-thickness Skin Equivalents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:20417-20425.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b04017

  309. 309.

    Dinescu S., Albu Kaya M., Chitoiu L., Ignat S., Kaya D.A., Costache M., Mondal M. Collagen-Based Hydrogels and Their Applications for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Cellulose-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series. 2018.

    Not in our library

  310. 310.

    Ucar B., Humpel C. Collagen for brain repair: Therapeutic perspectives. Neural. Regen. Res. 2018;13:595-598.

    Not in our library10.4103/1673-5374.230273

  311. 311.

    Gómez-Guillén M.C., Giménez B., López-Caballero M.E., Montero M.P. Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2011;25:1813-1827.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.007

  312. 312.

    Farris S., Song J., Huang Q. Alternative Reaction Mechanism for the Cross-Linking of Gelatin with Glutaraldehyde. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:998-1003.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf9031603

  313. 313.

    Nagarajan S., Radhakrishnan S., Kalkura S.N., Balme S., Miele P., Bechelany M. Overview of Protein-Based Biopolymers for Biomedical Application. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019;220:1900126.

    Not in our library10.1002/macp.201900126

  314. 314.

    Ni N., Dumont M.-J. Protein-Based Hydrogels Derived from Industrial Byproducts Containing Collagen, Keratin, Zein and Soy. Waste Biomass Valor. 2017;8:285-300.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12649-016-9684-0

  315. 315.

    Neves N.M., Reis R.L. Biomaterials from Nature for Advanced Devices and Therapies. 2016.

    Not in our library

  316. 316.

    de Guzman R.C., Merrill M.R., Richter J.R., Hamzi R.I., Greengauz-Roberts O.K., Van Dyke M.E. Mechanical and biological properties of keratose biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8205-8217.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.054

  317. 317.

    Cohen D.J., Hyzy S.L., Haque S., Olson L.C., Boyan B.D., Saul J.M., Schwartz Z. Effects of Tunable Keratin Hydrogel Erosion on rhBMP-2 Release, Bioactivity, and Bone Induction. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2018;24:1616-1630.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0471

  318. 318.

    Kumaran P., Gupta A., Sharma S. Synthesis of wound-healing keratin hydrogels using chicken feathers proteins and its properties. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017;9:171-178.

    Not in our library10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i2.15620

  319. 319.

    Ma X., Sun X., Hargrove D., Chen J., Song D., Dong Q., Lu X., Fan T., Fu Y., Lei Y. A Biocompatible and Biodegradable Protein Hydrogel with Green and Red Autofluorescence: Preparation, Characterization and In vivo Biodegradation Tracking and Modeling. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:19370.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep19370

  320. 320.

    Pandey V., Haider T., Jain P., Gupta P.N., Soni V. Silk as a leading-edge biological macromolecule for improved drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020;55:101294.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101294

  321. 321.

    Liu B., Song Y.W., Jin L., Wang Z.J., Pu D.Y., Lin S.Q., Zhou C., You H.J., Ma Y., Li J.M., et al. Silk structure and degradation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2015;131:122-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.040

  322. 322.

    Li Z., Song J., Zhang J., Hao K., Liu L., Wu B., Zheng X., Xiao B., Tong X., Dai F. Topical application of silk fibroin-based hydrogel in preventing hypertrophic scars. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2020;185:110735.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110735

  323. 323.

    Yin Z., Wu F., Xing T., Yadavalli V.K., Kunduc S.C., Lu S. A silk fibroin hydrogel with reversible sol–gel transition. RSC Adv. 2017;7:24085.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7ra02682j

  324. 324.

    Xu M. Development of protein based hydrogels as encapsulation matrices for Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393. Master’s Thesis. 2015.

    Not in our library

  325. 325.

    Nagarkar S., Nicolai T., Chassenieux C., Lele A. Structure and gelation mechanism of silk hydrogels. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:3834-3844.

    Not in our library10.1039/b916319k

  326. 326.
  327. 327.

    Wong D.C., Pearson R.D., Elvin C.M., Merritt D.J. Expression of the rubber-like protein, resilin, in developing and functional insect cuticle determined using a Drosophila anti-rec 1 resilin antibody. Dev. Dyn. 2012;241:333-339.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.23724

  328. 328.

    de Castro R.J.S., Domingues M.A.F., Ohara A., Okuro P.K., dos Santos J.G., Brexó R.P., Sato H.H. Whey protein as a key component in food systems: Physicochemical properties, production technologies and applications. Food Struct. 2017;14:17-29.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foostr.2017.05.004

  329. 329.

    Tansaz S., Boccaccini A.R. Biomedical applications of soy protein: A brief overview. Mater. Res. Part A. 2016;104:553-569.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35569

  330. 330.

    Tian K., Shao Z., Chen X. Natural electroactive hydrogel from soy protein isolation. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:3638-3643.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm101094g

  331. 331.

    Lin H., Hsieh F., Tseng C., Hsu S. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and the hybrid gel with soy protein for 3D cell-laden bioprinting. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016;4:6694-6705.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6tb01501h

  332. 332.

    Meikle S.T., Standen G., Salvage J., De Santis R., Nicolais L., Ambrosio L., Santin M. Synthesis and Characterization of Soybean-Based Hydrogels with an Intrinsic Activity on Cell Differentiation. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2012;18:1932-1939.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0549

  333. 333.

    Ali A., Ahmed S. Recent Advances in Edible Polymer Based Hydrogels as a Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Polymers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018;66:6940-6967.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01052

  334. 334.

    Li H., Kong N., Laver B., Liu J. Hydrogels Constructed from Engineered Proteins. Small. 2016;12:973-987.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201502429

  335. 335.

    Cook W.J., Walter L.J., Walter M.R. Drug binding by calmodulin: Crystal structure of a calmodulin-trifluoperazine complex. Biochemistry. 1994;33:15259-15265.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi00255a006

  336. 336.

    Daamen W.F., Hafmans T., Veerkamp J.H., van Kuppevelt T.H. Comparison of five procedures for the purification of insoluble elastin. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1997-2005.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00383-5

  337. 337.

    Mithieux S.M., Rasko J.E.J., Weiss A.S. Synthetic elastin hydrogels derived from massive elastic assemblies of self-organized human protein monomers. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4921-4927.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.055

  338. 338.

    Leach J.B., Wolinsky J.B., Stone P.J., Wong J.Y. Crosslinked alpha-elastin biomaterials: Towards a processable elastin mimetic scaffold. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:155-164.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2004.12.001

  339. 339.

    Lim D.W., Nettles D.L., Setton L.A., Chilkoti A. In situ cross-linking of elastin-like polypeptide block copolymers for tissue repair. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:222-230.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm7007982

  340. 340.

    Haider M., Megeed Z., Ghandehari H. Genetically engineered polymers: Status and prospects for controlled release. J. Control. Release. 2004;95:1-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.11.011

  341. 341.

    Petka W.A., Harden J.L., McGrath K.P., Wirtz D., Tirrell D.A. Reversible hydrogels from self-assembling artificial proteins. Science. 1998;281:389-392.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.281.5375.389

  342. 342.

    Banta S., Wheeldon I.R., Blenner M. Protein Engineering in the Development of Functional Hydrogels. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2010;12:167-186.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105334

  343. 343.

    Cao Y., Li H. Engineering tandem modular protein based reversible hydrogels. Chem. Commun. 2008;4144-4146.

    Not in our library10.1039/b806684a

  344. 344.

    Huang C., Ravindran S., Yin Z., George A. 3-D self-assembling leucine zipper hydrogel with tunable properties for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5316-5326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.035

  345. 345.

    Shu J.Y., Tan C., DeGrado W.F., Xu T. New design of helix bundle peptide-polymer conjugates. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:2111-2117.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm800113g

  346. 346.

    Posritong S., Flores Chavez R., Chu T.G., Bruzzaniti A. A Pyk2 inhibitor incorporated into a PEGDA-gelatin hydrogel promotes osteoblast activity and mineral deposition. Biomed. Mater. 2019;14:025015.

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-605x/aafffa

  347. 347.
  348. 348.

    Singh D., Zo S.M., Singh D., Han S.S. Interpenetrating Alginate on Gelatin- Poly (2-hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) as a Functional Polymeric Matrix for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Po. 2019;68:551-563.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2016.1252349

  349. 349.

    Kim D.H., Heo S.-J., Shin J.-W., Mun C.W. Preparation of Thermosensitive Gelatin-Pluronic Copolymer for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Macromol. Res. 2010;18:387-391.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13233-010-0405-4

  350. 350.

    Han L., XU J., LU X., Gan D., Wang Z., WANG K.F., Zhang H., Yuan H., Weng J. Biohybrid methacrylated gelatin/ polyacrylamide hydrogels for cartilage repair. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:731-741.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6tb02348g

  351. 351.

    Saghebasl S., Davaran S., Rahbarghazi R., Montaseri A., Salehi R., Ramazani A. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of thermosensitive hydrogel scaffolds based on (PNIPAAm-PCL-PEG-PCL-PNIPAAm)/Gelatin and (PCL-PEGPCL)/ Gelatin for use in cartilage tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018;29:1185-1206.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2018.1447627

  352. 352.

    Temofeew N.A., Hixon K.R., McBride-Gagyi S.H., Sell S.A. The fabrication of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with poloxamer 407 for potential use in the regeneration of the nucleus pulposus. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017;28:36.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-016-5824-0

  353. 353.

    Marin S., Albu Kaya M.G., Ghica M.V., Dinu-Pîrvu C., Popa L., Udeanu D.I., Mihai G., Enachescu M. Collagen-Polyvinyl Alcohol-Indomethacin Biohybrid Matrices as Wound Dressings. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:224.

    Not in our library10.3390/pharmaceutics10040224

  354. 354.

    Pan H., Fan D., Duan Z., Zhu C., Fu R., Li X. Non-stick hemostasis hydrogels as dressings with bacterial barrier activity for cutaneous wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;105:110118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2019.110118

  355. 355.

    Norouzi M.R., Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Gharibi H., Meamar R., Ajalloueian F., Chronakis I.S. Surface modification of poly (ethylene terephthalate) fabric by soy protein isolate hydrogel for wound dressing application. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2018;68:1-9.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2018.1493684

  356. 356.

    Snyders R., Shingel K.I., Zabeida O., Roberge C., Faure M.-P., Martinu L., Klemberg-Sapieha J.E. Mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid poly(ethylene glycol)–soy protein hydrogels for wound dressing applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2007;83:88-97.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.31217

  357. 357.

    Demeter M., Virgolici M., Vancea C., Scarisoreanu A., Kaya M.G.A., Meltzer V. Network structure studies on γ–irradiated Collagen–PVP superabsorbent hydrogels. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017;131:51-59.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.029

  358. 358.

    Noppakundilograt S., Choopromkaw S., Kiatkamjornwong S. Hydrolyzed collagen-grafted-poly[(acrylic acid)-co-(methacrylic acid)] hydrogel for drug delivery. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018;135:45654.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.45654

  359. 359.

    Pupkaite J., Rosenquist J., Hilborn J., Samanta A. Injectable Shape-Holding Collagen Hydrogel for Cell Encapsulation and Delivery Cross-linked Using Thiol-Michael Addition Click Reaction. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20:3475-3484.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00769

  360. 360.

    Bini R.A., Silva M.F., Varanda L.C., da Silva M., Dreiss C.A. Soft nanocomposites of gelatin and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) nanoparticles for dual drug release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2017;157:191-198.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.05.051

  361. 361.

    Lai T., Yu J., Tsai W. Gelatin Methacrylate/Carboxybetaine Methacrylate Hydrogels with Tunable Crosslinking for Controlled Drug Release. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016;4:2304-2313.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5tb02518d

  362. 362.

    Anirudhan T.S., Mohan A.M. Novel pH sensitive dual drug loaded-gelatin methacrylate/methacrylic acid hydrogel for the controlled release of antibiotics. Int. J. Biol Macromol. 2018;110:167-178.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.220

  363. 363.

    Yu M., Yao Q., Zhang Y., Chen H., He H., Zhang Y., Yin T., Tang X., Xu H. Core/shell PLGA microspheres with controllable in vivo release profile via rational core phase design. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018;46:1070-1079.

    Not in our library10.1080/21691401.2018.1443940

  364. 364.

    Guo J., Pan S., Yin X., He Y.-F., Li T., Wang R.-M. pH-Sensitive keratin-based polymer hydrogel and its controllable drug-release behavior. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015;132:41572.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.41572

  365. 365.

    Liu Y., Cui Y., Liao M. pH and temperature-responsive IPN hydrogels based on soy protein and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-sodium acrylate). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015;131:39781.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.39781

  366. 366.

    He N., Chen X., Wang L., Wen J., Li Y., Cao Q., Liu Z., Li B. Fabrication of composite hydrogels based on soy protein isolate and their controlled globular protein delivery. Glob. Chall. 2019;3:1900030.

    Not in our library10.1002/gch2.201900030

  367. 367.

    Aderibigbe B.A., Mhlwatika Z. Dual release kinetics of antimalarials from soy protein isolate-carbopol-polyacrylamide based hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016;133:43918.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.43918

  368. 368.

    Zhu Q., Gong Y., Guo T., Deng J., Ji J., Wang B., Hao S. Thermo-sensitive keratin hydrogel against iron-induced brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Int. J. Pharm. 2019;566:342-351.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.076

  369. 369.

    Vijayavenkataraman S., Vialli N., Fuh J.Y.H., Lu W.F. Conductive collagen/PPy-b-PCL hydrogel for bioprinting of neural tissue constructs. Int. J. Bioprint. 2019;5:229.

    Not in our library10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.229

  370. 370.

    Chen K., Fan X., Tang K., Wan G., He X., Li X., Chen Q., Shen M., Lv Y., Wang F. A morphology-controllable collagen/poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) porous hydrogel with paraffin microsphere as template. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2018;1:1311-1318.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsabm.8b00264

  371. 371.

    Wang C., Chen C., Guo M., Li B., Han F., Chen W. Stretchable collagen-coated polyurethane-urea hydrogel seeded with bladder smooth muscle cells for urethral defect repair in a rabbit model. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2019;30:135.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-019-6342-7

  372. 372.

    Wakuda Y., Nishimoto S., Suye S., Fujita S. Native collagen hydrogel nanofibres with anisotropic structure using core-shell electrospinning. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6248.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-24700-9

  373. 373.

    Sarkar J., Kamble S.C., Patil R., Kumar A., Gosavi S.W. Gelatin interpenetration in poly N-isopropylacrylamide network reduces the compressive modulus of the scaffold: A property employed to mimic hepatic matrix stiffness. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020;117:567-579.

    Not in our library10.1002/bit.27218

  374. 374.

    Yu L., Gu L. Hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile-blend-soy protein hydrogel fibers: A study of structure and dynamic pH response. Polym. Int. 2009;58:66-73.

    Not in our library10.1002/pi.2493

  375. 375.

    Vishnoi T., Singh A., Teotia A.K., Kumar A. Chitosan-Gelatin-Polypyrrole Cryogel Matrix for Stem Cell Differentiation into Neural Lineage and Sciatic Nerve Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve Injury Model. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:3007-3021.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00242

  376. 376.

    Li G., Kong Y., Zhao Y., Zhao Y., Zhang L., Yang Y. Fabrication and characterization of polyacrylamide/silk fibroin hydrogels for peripheral nerve regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2015;26:899-916.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2015.1066109

  377. 377.

    Sui Z., King W.J., Murphy W.L. Dynamic Materials Based on a Protein Conformational Change. Adv. Mater. 2007;19:3377-3380.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.200700092

  378. 378.

    Tan H., Jin D., Qu X., Liu H., Yin M., Liu C. A PEG-Lysozyme hydrogel harvests multiple functions as a fit-to-shape tissue sealant for internal-use of body. Biomaterials. 2019;192:392-404.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.047

  379. 379.

    Park K.M., Lee Y., Son J.Y., Oh D.H., Lee J.S., Park K.D. Synthesis and characterizations of in situ cross-linkable gelatin and 4-arm-PPO-PEO hybrid hydrogels via enzymatic reaction for tissue regenerative medicine. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:604-611.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm201712z

  380. 380.

    Zheng Z., Wu J., Liu M., Wang H., Li C., Rodriguez M.J., Li G., Wang X., Kaplan D.L. 3D Bioprinting of Self-Standing Silk-Based Bioink. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2018;7:1701026.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201701026

  381. 381.

    McGann C.L., Akins R.E., Kiick K.L. Resilin-PEG hybrid hydrogels yield degradable elastomeric scaffolds with heterogeneous microstructure. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:128-140.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01255

  382. 382.

    Liu B., Lewis A.K., Shen W. Physical Hydrogels Photo-Cross-Linked from Self-Assembled Macromers for Potential Use in Tissue Engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:3182-3187.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm900908g

  383. 383.

    Visser J., Melchels F.P.W., Jeon J.E., van Bussel E.M., Kimpton L.S., Byrne H.M., Dhert W.J.A., Dalton P.D., Hutmacher D.W., Malda J. Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6933.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7933

  384. 384.

    De Mori A., Fernández M.P., Blunn G., Tozzi G., Roldo M. 3D Printing and Electrospinning of Composite Hydrogels for Cartilage and Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers. 2018;10:285.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym10030285

  385. 385.

    Liu W., Zhan J., Su Y., Wu T., Ramakrishna S., Liao S., Mo X. Injectable hydrogel incorporating with nanoyarn for bone regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2014;25:168-180.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2013.848326

  386. 386.

    Gan Y., Li P., Wang L., Mo X., Song L., Xu Y., Zhao C., Ouyang B., Tu B., Luo L., et al. An interpenetrating network-strengthened and toughened hydrogel that supports cell-based nucleus pulposus regeneration. Biomaterials. 2017;136:12-28.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.017

  387. 387.

    Wang X., Partlow B., Liu J., Zheng Z., Su B., Wang Y., Kaplan D.L. Injectable silk-polyethylene glycol hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2015;12:51-61.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.027

  388. 388.

    Xu Y., Peng J., Richards G., Lu S., Eglin D. Optimization of electrospray fabrication of stem cell-embedded alginate-gelatin microspheres and their assembly in 3D- printed poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Orthop. Transl. 2019;18:128-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jot.2019.05.003

  389. 389.
  390. 390.

    Lee J.M., Sultan M.T., Kim S.H., Kumar V., Yeon Y.K., Lee O.J., Park C.H. Artificial Auricular Cartilage Using Silk Fibroin and Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1707.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18081707

  391. 391.

    Bektas C.K., Kimiz I., Urkmez A.S., Hasirci V., Hasirci N. A Bilayer Scaffold Prepared from Collagen and Carboxymethyl Cellulose for Skin Tissue Engineering Applications. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018;29:1764-1784.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2018.1498718

  392. 392.

    Park M., Kim B.-S., Shin H.K., Park S.-J., Kim H.-Y. Preparation and characterization of keratin-based biocomposite hydrogels prepared by electron beam irradiation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2013;33:5051-5057.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.032

  393. 393.

    Park M., Shin H.K., Kim B.-S., Kim M.J., Kim I.-S., Park B.-Y., Kim H.-Y. Effect of discarded keratin-based biocomposite hydrogels on the wound healing process in vivo. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2015;55:88-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.033

  394. 394.

    Punyamoonwongsa P., Klayya S., Sajomsang W., Kunyanee C., Aueviriyavit S. Silk sericin semi-interpenetrating network hydrogels based on PEG-Diacrylate for wound healing treatment. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2019;2019:4740765.

    Not in our library10.1155/2019/4740765

  395. 395.

    Aramwit P., Sereemaspun A., Yamdech R. Sericin Ameliorates the Properties of Poly(VinylAlcohol) Hydrogel Prepared by Simple Repeated Freeze-Thaw Process without the Use of Chemical Crosslinking. IJRS. 2018;4:6-11.

    Not in our library10.24178/ijrs.2018.4.3.06

  396. 396.
  397. 397.

    Kundu B., Kundu S.C. Silk sericin/polyacrylamide in situ forming hydrogels for dermal reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7456-7467.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.091

  398. 398.

    Youngblood R.L., Truong N.F., Segura T., Shea L.D. It’s All in the Delivery: Designing Hydrogels for Cell and Non-viral Gene Therapies. Mol. Ther. 2018;26:2087-2106.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.07.022

  399. 399.

    Krebs M.D., Jeon O., Alsberg E. Localized and sustained delivery of silencing RNA from macroscopic biopolymer hydrogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:9204-9206.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja9037615

  400. 400.

    Peng H., Yang H., Song L., Zhou Z., Sun J., Du Y., Lu K., Li T., Yin A., Xu J., et al. Sustained delivery of siRNA/PEI complex from in situ forming hydrogels potently inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;35:57.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13046-016-0334-y

  401. 401.

    Pamfil D., Vasile C., Thakur V., Thakur M.K., Voicu S. Chapter 4: Nanogels of natural polymers. Polymer Gels: Science and Fundamentals. Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials. 2018;71-110.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-981-10-6080-9_4

  402. 402.

    Tran D.-H.N., Nguyen T.H., Vo T.N.N., Pham L.P.T., Vo D.M.H., Nguyen C.K., Bach L.G., Nguyen D.H. Self-assembled poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether-grafted gelatin nanogels for efficient delivery of curcumin in cancer treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019;136:47544.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.47544

  403. 403.

    Ge J., Min S.-H., Kim D.M., Lee D.C., Park K.C., Yeom Y.I. Selective gene delivery to cancer cells secreting matrix metalloproteinases using a gelatin/polyethylenimine/DNA complex. Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 2012;17:160-167.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12257-011-0423-x

  404. 404.

    Truong-Le V.L., Walsh S.M., Schweibert E., Mao Q.H., Guggino W.B., August J.T., Leong K.W. Gene transfer by DNA-gelatin nanospheres. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999;361:47-56.

    Not in our library10.1006/abbi.1998.0975

  405. 405.

    Rumschöttel J., Baus S., Kosmella S., Appelhans D., Koetz J. Incorporation of DNA/PEI polyplexes into gelatin/chitosan hydrogel scaffolds: A μ-DSC study. Compos. Interfaces. 2018;25:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1080/09276440.2017.1302725

  406. 406.

    Chao G., Deng H., Huang Q., Jia W., Huang W., Gu Y., Tan H., Fan L., Liu C., Huang A., et al. Preparation and Characterization of pH Sensitive Semi-interpenetrating Network Hydrogel Based on Methacrylic Acid, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), and PEG. J. Polym. Res. 2006;13:349-355.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-006-9050-1

  407. 407.

    Gayet J.-C., Fortier G. High water content BSA-PEG hydrogel for controlled release device: Evaluation of the drug release properties. J. Control. Release. 1996;38:177-184.

    Not in our library10.1016/0168-3659(95)00118-2

  408. 408.

    Li X., Qin J., Ma J. Silk fibroin/poly (vinyl alcohol) blend scaffolds for controlled delivery of curcumin. Regen. Biomater. 2015;2:97-105.

    Not in our library10.1093/rb/rbv008

  409. 409.

    Zhong T., Jiang Z., Wang P., Bie S., Zhang F., Zuo B. Silk fibroin/copolymer composite hydrogels for the controlled and sustained release of hydrophobic/hydrophilic drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2015;494:264-270.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.035

  410. 410.

    Farooq M.A., Aquib M., Ghayas S., Bushra R., Khan D.H., Parveen A., Wang B. Whey protein: A functional and promising material for drug delivery systems recent developments and future prospects. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019;30:2183-2191.

    Not in our library10.1002/pat.4676

  411. 411.

    Aderibigbe B.A., Ndwabu S. Evaluation of whey protein isolate-graft-carbopolpolyacrylamide pH-sensitive composites for controlled release of pamidronate. Polym. Bull. 2017;74:5129-5144.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00289-017-2008-0

  412. 412.

    Seeman N. DNA in a material world. Nature. 2003;421:427-431.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01406

  413. 413.

    Stoleru E., Vasile C., Vasile C. Chapter 6: Nucleic acids-based bionanomaterials for drug and gene therapy. Micro and Nano Technologies. 2019;235-259.

    Not in our library

  414. 414.

    Gačanin J., Synatschke C.V., Weil T. Biomedical applications of DNA-based hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:1906253.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201906253

  415. 415.

    Costa D., Valente A.J.M., Queiroz J., Thakur V.K., Thakur M.K. Chapter 13: DNA-Based Hydrogels: An Approach for Multifunctional Bioapplications. Hydrogels, Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials. 2018.

    Not in our library

  416. 416.

    Lia J., Mo L., Lu C.-H., Fu T., Yang H.-H., Tan W. Functional nucleic acid-based hydrogels for bioanalytical and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:1410-1431.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5cs00586h

  417. 417.

    Um S.H., Lee J.B., Park N., Kwon S.Y., Umbach C.C., Luo D. Enzyme-catalysed assembly of DNA hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 2006;5:797-801.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat1741

  418. 418.

    Cheng E., Xing Y., Chen P., Yang Y., Sun Y., Zhou D., Xu L., Fan Q., Liu D. A pH-Triggered, fast-responding DNA hydrogel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:7660-7663.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200902538

  419. 419.

    Ding L., Li J., Wu C., Yan F., Li X., Zhang S. A self-assembled RNA-triple helix hydrogel drug delivery system targeting triple-negative breast cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9tb01610d

  420. 420.

    Lin D.C., Yurke B., Langrana N.A. Mechanical properties of a reversible, DNA-crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogel. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004;126:104-110.

    Not in our library10.1115/1.1645529

  421. 421.

    Soontornworajit B., Zhou J., Zhang Z., Wang Y. Aptamer-functionalized in situ injectable hydrogel for controlled protein release. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:2724.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm100774t

  422. 422.

    Li S., Chen N., Gaddes E.R., Zhang X., Dong C., Wang Y. A Drosera-bioinspired hydrogel for catching and killing cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14297.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep14297

  423. 423.

    Zhang X.-Z., Zeng X., Sun Y.-X., Zhuo R.-X., Zhao X., Courtney J.M., Qian H. Bioactive materials in gene therapy. Bioactive Materials in Medicine. 2011.

    Not in our library

  424. 424.

    Korolev N., Lyubartsev A., Nordenskiold L. Cation-induced polyelectrolyte-polyelectrolyte attraction in solutions of DNA and nucleosome core particles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;158:32-47.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cis.2009.08.002

  425. 425.

    Costa D., Valente A.J.M., Queiroz J. Plasmid DNA nanogels as photoresponsive materials for multifunctional bio-applications. J. Biotechnol. 2015;20:98-104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.10.033

  426. 426.

    Ding F., Huang X., Gao X., Xie M., Pan G., Li Q., Song J., Zhu X., Zhang C. A Non-cationic Nucleic Acid Nanogel for the Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Tool. Nanoscale. 2019;11:17211-17215.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nr05233j

  427. 427.

    Mimi H., Ho K., Siu Y., Wu A., Li P. Polyethyleneimine-based core-shell nanogels: A promising siRNA carrier for argininosuccinate synthetase mRNA knockdown in HeLa cells. J. Control. Release. 2012;158:123-130.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.035

  428. 428.

    Li R.Q., Wu W., Song H.Q., Ren Y., Yang M., Li J., Xu F.J. Well-defined reducible cationic nanogels based on functionalized low-molecular-weight PGMA for effective pDNA and siRNA delivery. Acta Biomater. 2016;41:282-292.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.006

  429. 429.

    Kang H., Liu H., Zhang X., Yan J., Zhu Z., Peng L., Yang H., Kim Y., Tan W. Photoresponsive DNA-Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Controllable Release and Cancer Therapy. Langmuir. 2011;27:399-408.

    Not in our library10.1021/la1037553

  430. 430.

    Wang Y., Zhang S., Benoit D.S.W. Degradable poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogels for spatiotemporal control of siRNA/nanoparticle delivery. J. Control. Release. 2018;287:58-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.002

  431. 431.

    Li F., Lyu D., Liu S., Guo W. DNA Hydrogels and Microgels for Biosensing and Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater. 2019;32:1-9.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201806538

  432. 432.

    Dave N., Huang P.-J.J., Chan M.Y., Smith B.D., Liu J. Regenerable DNA-functionalized hydrogels for ultrasensitive, instrument-free mercury(II) detection and removal in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:12668.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja106098j

  433. 433.

    Hu Y., Kahn J.S., Guo W., Huang F., Fadeev M., Harries D., Willner I. Reversible Modulation of DNA-Based Hydrogel Shapes by Internal Stress Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:16112-16119.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.6b10458

  434. 434.

    Guo W., Lu C.-H., Orbach R., Wang F., Qi X.-J., Cecconello A., Seliktar D., Willner I. pH-Stimulated DNA Hydrogels Exhibiting Shape-Memory Properties. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:73-78.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201403702

  435. 435.

    Liu X., Zhang J., Fadeev M., Li Z., Wulf V., Tian H., Willner I. Chemical and photochemical DNA “gears” reversibly control stiffness, shape-memory, self-healing and controlled release properties of polyacrylamide hydrogels. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:1008-1016.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8sc04292f

  436. 436.

    Rico-García D., Ruiz-Rubio L., Pérez-Alvarez L., Hernández-Olmos S.L., Guerrero-Ramírez G.L., Vilas-Vilela J.L. Lignin-Based Hydrogels: Synthesis and Applications. Polymers. 2020;12:81.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym12010081

  437. 437.

    Meng Y., Lu J., Cheng Y., Li Q., Wang H. Lignin-based hydrogels: A review of preparation, properties, and application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;135:1006-1019.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.198

  438. 438.

    Penaranda J.E., Sabino M.A. Effect of the presence of lignin or peat in IPN hydrogels on the sorption of heavy metals. Polym. Bull. 2010;65:495-508.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00289-010-0264-3

  439. 439.

    Jin C., Song W., Liu T., Xin J., Hiscox W.C., Zhang J., Liu G., Kong Z. Temperature and pH responsive hydrogels using methacrylated lignosulfonate cross-linker: Synthesis, characterization, and properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:1763-1771.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03158

  440. 440.

    Passauer L., Halles T., Baucker E., Ciesielski G., Lebioda S., Hamer U. Biodegradation of hydrogels from oxyethylated lignins in model soils. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015;3:1955-1964.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00139

  441. 441.

    Kai D., Low Z.W., Liow S.S., Karim A.A., Ye H., Jin G., Li K., Loh X.J. Development of lignin supramolecular hydrogels with mechanically responsive and self-healing properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015;3:2160-2169.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00405

  442. 442.

    Zhao H., Feng Q., Xie Y., Li J., Chen X. Preparation of biocompatible hydrogel from lignin-carbohydrate complex (LCC) as cell carriers. Bioresources. 2017;12:8490-8504.

    Not in our library

  443. 443.

    Naficy S., Spinks G.M., Wallace G.G. Thin, tough, pH-sensitive hydrogel films with rapid load recovery. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:4109-4114.

    Not in our library10.1021/am405708v

  444. 444.

    Oveissi F., Naficy S., Le T.Y.L., Fletcher D.F., Dehghani F. Tough and processable hydrogels based on lignin and hydrophilic polyurethane. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2018;1:2073-2081.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsabm.8b00546

  445. 445.

    Park S., Kim S.H., Won K., Choi J.W., Kim Y.H., Kim H.J., Yang Y.-H., Lee S.H. Wood mimetic hydrogel beads for enzyme immobilization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;115:223-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.096

  446. 446.

    Borisenkov M.F., Karmanov A.P., Kocheva L.S., Markov P.A., Istomina E.I., Bakutova L.A., Litvinets S.G., Martinson E.A., Durnev E.A., Vityazev F.V., et al. Adsorption of beta-glucuronidase and estrogens on pectin/lignin hydrogel particles. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2016;65:433-441.

    Not in our library10.1080/00914037.2015.1129955

  447. 447.

    Figueiredo P., Ferro C., Kemell M., Liu Z., Kiriazis A., Lintinen K., Florindo H.F., Yli-Kauhaluoma J., Hirvonen J., Kostiainen M.A., et al. Functionalization of carboxylated lignin nanoparticles for targeted and pH-responsive delivery of anticancer drugs. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2581-2596.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2017-0219

  448. 448.

    Ciolacu D., Oprea A.M., Anghel N., Cazacu G., Cazacu M. New cellulose-lignin hydrogels and their application in controlled release of polyphenols. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2012;32:452-463.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2011.11.018

  449. 449.

    Wu L., Huang S., Zheng J., Qiu Z., Lin X., Qin Y. Synthesis and characterization of biomass lignin-based PVA super-absorbent hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;140:538-545.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.142

  450. 450.

    Wang X., Zhou Z., Guo X., He Q. Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of sodium lignosulfonate-grafted poly(acrylic acid-co-poly (vinyl pyrrolidone)) hydrogel for drug delivery. RSC Adv. 2016;6:35550-35558.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ra03398a

  451. 451.

    Spasojevic D., Zmejkoski D., Glamoclija J., Nikolic M., Sokovic M., Milosevic V., Jaric I., Stojanovic M., Marinkovic E., Barisani-Asenbauer T., et al. Lignin model compound in alginate hydrogel: A strong antimicrobial agent with high potential in wound treatment. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2016;48:732-735.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.014

  452. 452.

    Yang W., Fortunati E., Dominici F., Giovanale G., Mazzaglia A., Balestra G.M., Kenny J.M., Puglia D. Effect of cellulose and lignin on disintegration, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of PLA active films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;89:360-368.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.068

  453. 453.

    Mahata D., Jana M., Jana A., Mukherjee A., Mondal N., Saha T., Sen S., Nando G.B., Mukhopadhyay C.K., Chakraborty R., et al. Lignin-graft-polyoxazoline conjugated triazole a novel anti-infective ointment to control persistent inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:46412-46417.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep46412

  454. 454.

    Ravishankar K., Venkatesan M., Preeth R., Mahalingam A. Biocompatible hydrogels of chitosan-alkali lignin for potential wound healing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;102:447-457.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.038

  455. 455.

    Zmejkoski D., Spasojevic D., Orlovska I., Kozyrovska N., Sokovic M., Glamoclija J., Dmitrovic S., Matovic B., Tasic N., Maksimovic V., et al. Bacterial cellulose-lignin composite hydrogel as a promising agent in chronic wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;118:494-503.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.067

  456. 456.

    Musilová L., Mrácek A., Kovalcik A., Smolka P., Minarík A., Humpolícek P., Vícha R., Ponížil P. Hyaluronan hydrogels modified by glycinated Kraft lignin: Morphology, swelling, viscoelastic properties and biocompatibility. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;181:394-403.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.048

  457. 457.

    Larrañeta E., Imízcoz M., Toh J.X., Irwin N.J., Ripolin A., Perminova A., Dom J., Rodr A., Donnelly R.F. Synthesis and Characterization of Lignin Hydrogels for Potential Applications as Drug Eluting Antimicrobial Coatings for Medical Materials. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:9037-9046.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01371

  458. 458.

    Alles N., Soysa N.S., Hussain M.D.A., Tomomatsu N., Saito H., Baron R., Morimoto N., Aoki K., Akiyoshi K., Ohya K. Polysaccharide nanogel delivery of a TNF-α aand RANKL antagonist peptide allows systemic prevention of bone loss. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;37:83-88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2009.01.002

  459. 459.

    Uenaka A., Wada H., Isobe M., Saika T., Tsuji K., Sato E., Sato S., Noguchi Y., Kawabata R., Yasuda T., et al. T cell immunomonitoring and tumor responses in patients immunized with a complex of cholesterol-bearing hydrophobized pullulan (CHP) and NY-ESO-1 protein. Cancer Immunol. 2007;7:9-20.

    Not in our library

  460. 460.

    Kageyama S., Kitano S., Hirayama M., Nagata Y., Imai H., Shiraishi T., Akiyoshi K., Scott A.M., Murphy R., Hoffman E.W., et al. Humoral immune responses in patients vaccinated with 1-146 HER2 protein complexed with cholesteryl pullulan nanogel. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:601-607.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00705.x

  461. 461.

    Kitano S., Kageyama S., Nagata Y., Miyahara Y., Hiasa A., Naota H., Okumura S., Imai H., Shiraishi T., Masuya M., et al. HER2-specific T-cell immune responses in patients vaccinated with truncated HER2 protein complexed with nanogels of cholesteryl pullulan. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:7397-7405.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1546

  462. 462.

    Kawabata R., Wada H., Isobe M., Saika T., Sato S., Uenaka A., Miyata H., Yasuda T., Doki Y., Noguchi Y., et al. Antibody response against NY-ESO-1 in CHP-NY-ESO-1 vaccinated patients. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;120:2178-2184.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.22583

  463. 463.

    Shingel K.I., Di Stabille L., Marty J.P., Faure M.P. Inflammatory inert poly(ethylene glycol)–protein wound dressing improves healing responses in partial- and full-thickness wounds. Int. Wound J. 2006;3:332-342.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-481x.2006.00262.x

  464. 464.

    Nochi T., Yuki Y., Takahashi H., Sawada S.-I., Mejima M., Kohda T., Harada N., Kong I.G., Sato A., Kataoka N., et al. Nanogel antigenic protein-delivery system for adjuvant-free intranasal vaccines. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:572-578.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat2784

  465. 465.

    Kanokpanont S., Damrongsakkul S., Ratanavaraporn J., Aramwit P. An innovative bi-layered wound dressing made of silk and gelatin for accelerated wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2012;436:141-153.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.046

  466. 466.

    Kwiecień I., and Kwiecień M. Application of Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels as Probiotic Delivery Systems. Gels. 2018;4:47.

    Not in our library10.3390/gels4020047

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.