Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.

Response of Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Role of Polyphenols in Plants under Abiotic Stress

Anket Sharma, Babar Shahzad, Abdul Rehman and 3 more

Molecules · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/molecules24132452

Abstract

Phenolic compounds are an important class of plant secondary metabolites which play crucial physiological roles throughout the plant life cycle. Phenolics are produced under optimal and suboptimal conditions in plants and play key roles in developmental processes like cell division, hormonal regulation, photosynthetic activity, nutrient mineralization, and reproduction. Plants exhibit increased synthesis of polyphenols such as phenolic acids and flavonoids under abiotic stress conditions, which help the plant to cope with environmental constraints. Phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway is activated under abiotic stress conditions (drought, heavy metal, salinity, high/low temperature, and ultraviolet radiations) resulting in accumulation of various phenolic compounds which, among other roles, have the potential to scavenge harmful reactive oxygen species. Deepening the research focuses on the phenolic responses to abiotic stress is of great interest for the scientific community. In the present article, we discuss the biochemical and molecular mechanisms related to the activation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and we describe phenolic-mediated stress tolerance in plants. An attempt has been made to provide updated and brand-new information about the response of phenolics under a challenging environment.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 15, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Plants face a plethora of biotic and abiotic stresses during their entire life which have negative impact on their growth, development, and productivity. Biotic factors include insect pests, fungi, and weeds whereas abiotic stresses include salinity, drought, heavy metals, pesticides, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, as well as heat and cold stress. The amplitude of these abiotic stresses has increased severely in recent years principally due to anthropogenic activities. Plants, being sessile, are persistently exposed to these factors and require a set of effective mechanisms which can be activated under unfavorable circumstances to sustain their life cycle. According to some reports, the projection of these stresses contributes significantly and affects the growth and productivity by reducing crop yield and overall crop production by 70% and 50%, respectively. Thus, it is imperative to reduce the crop productivity losses by improving crop performance through various approaches, including application of plant bio-stimulant products as well as stimulation of plant secondary metabolism. Plants need to endure different abiotic stresses and polyphenols accumulate in response to these stresses helping plants to acclimatize to unfavorable environments. Hence, the concentration of phenols in plant tissue is a good indicator to predict the extent of abiotic stress tolerance in plants which varies greatly in different plant species under an array of external factors.

Phenolic compounds influence the plant growth and development, including seed germination, biomass accumulation, and improved plant metabolism. In this regard, we summarized different studies showing a broad spectrum of different effects of abiotic stresses and discussed how endogenous phenol levels can help in mitigating abiotic stress in plants. Moreover, physiological and molecular mechanisms connected to the phenylpropanoid pathway underlying abiotic stress tolerance have extensively discussed. At the end, we explained phenol-mediated stress tolerance and suggestions have been made to further escalate the extent of deep mechanistic studies.

2. Biosynthetic Pathway of Polyphenols in Plants

Phenolics are known to be the largest groups of secondary metabolites in plants varying from simpler aromatic rings to more complex ones, such as lignins. These compounds originated from phenylalanine therefore are also called as phenylpropanoids. Polyphenols are characterized by the presence of large multiples of phenol structural units. The number and characteristics of these phenol structures underlie the unique physical, chemical, and biological properties of particular members of each class. Phenols are indeed divided into several groups such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, and lignans with peculiar properties. Plant phenolics are synthesized biogenetically through a shikimate/phenylpropanoid pathway, whereas a mevalonate pathway generates terpenoids. Both these secondary pathways produce a wide array of monomeric and polymeric structures encompassing a comprehensive array of physiological and biochemical roles in plants. The term “secondary metabolites” refers to the metabolites or phytochemicals synthesized through secondary metabolism. During the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds, erythrose 4-phosphate is combined with phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to form phenylalanine. Then phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) catalyzes the conversion of phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid. Several other phenolic compound such as flavonoids, coumarins, hydrolysable tannins, monolignols, lignans, and lignins are formed through this pathway, formally known as the phenylpropanoid pathway (see complete details in).

3. Physiological Roles of Phenolics in Plants

Phenolics are widely distributed and are involved in key metabolic and physiological process in plants. Phenolics influence different physiological processes related to growth and development in plants including seed germination, cell division, and synthesis of photosynthetic pigments. Phenolic compounds have been exploited for several application including bioremediation, allelochemical, promotion of plant growth, and antioxidants as food additives. In plants, phenolic accumulation is usually a consistent feature of plants under stress, which represents a defensive mechanism to cope with multiple abiotic stresses. Plant phenolics play an important role in several physiological processes to improve the tolerance and adaptability of plants under suboptimal conditions. In particular, a large number of secondary metabolites having antioxidant properties belong to this group which can ameliorate plant performance under stress conditions.

Plants interact with their living environment through secondary metabolites. Polyphenols are, for example, involved in signal transduction from the root to the shoot and also help in nutrient mobilization. The roots exudates contain phenolic compounds which alter the physiochemical properties of the rhizosphere. Soil microbes transform phenolics into compounds which help in N mineralization and humus formation. Furthermore, phenolics improve nutrient uptake through chelation of metallic ions, enhanced active absorption sites, and soil porosity with accelerated mobilization of elements like calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn). Recently, Rehman, et al. found that Zn application and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) treatment enhanced the contents of phenolics and organic acids (pyruvic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, malonic acid, malic acid, succinic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalic acid, and methyl malonic acid) in root exudates of wheat, which helped in nutrient mobilization of Zn, N, and Ca and their uptake. Phenolic compounds also help in N fixation in legumes. Legumes release several secondary metabolites from roots, principally flavonoid compounds (flavanols and iso-flavonoids) which play crucial role in Nod factors synthesis and in the production of infection tube during nodulation, given that they inhibits auxin transport and facilitate cell division.

Plant phenolics, as physiological regulator or chemical messenger, inhibit the IAA catabolism (dihydroxy B-ring flavonoids) or limit the IAA synthesis (monohydroxy B-ring flavonoids). Flavonoids play a key role in the development of functional pollen. For instance, addition of a very small dose of flavonol aglycones kaempferol or quercetin restored the fertility in mature pollen during pollination. Some phenolic compounds (trans-cinnamic acid, coumarin, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and benzoic acid) might be potentially phytotoxic if accumulated in high quantity and can inhibit germination and seedling growth due to the disruption of cellular enzyme functioning and impairment of cell division. For instance, some phenolic compounds inhibit the prolyl aminopeptidase and phosphatase enzyme involved in seed germination in legumes. Conversely, high phenolic acid contents have been reported to exert positive effects in seed germinating. In a recent study, Chen et al. found a substantial increase in free (1042%), bound (120%), and total phenolic acid content (741%) in canary grass during germination. The spruce bark extract containing polyphenols stimulated the germination rate in Lycopersicon esculentum while inhibited root elongation. Phenolics reduced the thickness and increased the seed tegument porosity which help in water imbibition and boost the germination rate. Polyphenolic extracts of spruce bark intensified the photosynthetic activity and biosynthesis of assimilatory pigment (chlorophyll a and b) in maize and sunflower. Phenolics reduced the energy required for ion transfer by modifying the structure of thylakoids and mitochondrial membranes. As antioxidants, phenolic compounds participate in the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), catalyzing oxygenation reactions through formation of metallic complexes, and inhibiting the activities of oxidizing enzymes.

In conclusion, polyphenols are produced under optimal and (with higher levels) in suboptimal conditions in plants and play crucial role in the development encompassing signal transduction, cell division, hormonal regulation, photosynthetic activity regulation, germination, and reproduction rate. Plants exhibiting increased synthesis of polyphenols under abiotic stresses usually show a better adaptability to limiting environments.

4. Abiotic Stresses and Their Toxic Effects on Plants

In recent times, producing more food and preventing crop losses to meet the demands of ever-increasing human populations has gained unprecedented importance. Nevertheless, a large proportion of arable land face abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, cold, heat, heavy metal toxicity, UV radiation, etc.) which are expected to increase due to climate change and the incidence of these environmental stresses are further fueled by anthropogenic activities. These abiotic stresses cause alteration in physiological and biochemical processes of plants which results in diminished plant growth and poor yield. These stresses bring rapid changes in cellular redox homeostasis with excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation which eventually damage cell organelles and interfere in ROS-promoted signaling pathways. Contrary to over production of ROS, a physiological redox state hampers normal cell functions and affects the plant immune system, suggesting that a threshold level of ROS is necessary for normal plant functioning (Figure 1; Farooq, et al.). Increased ROS generation under abiotic stresses enhanced itself exponentially the production of ROS, which result in peroxidation and destabilization of cellular membranes. Recently Rehman, et al. observed that heat stress and Zn deficiency cause reductions in growth (shoot and root biomass, and root length), and consequently impeded nutrient uptake, enhanced lipid peroxidation and impaired photosynthetic performance. In plants, ROS is produced from 1–2% of total O2 consumed in high active cell organelles like chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes (Figure 1;). The most common ROS are singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radicle (O2•–), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicle (•OH).

Abiotic stresses disturb the balance between ROS generation and scavenge and accelerate ROS propagation which damages vital macromolecules (nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids) and eventually leads to cell death. ROS-induced protein damage is caused by oxidation of amino acid residues (e.g., cysteine) for disulphide bond formation, oxidation of arginine, lysine, and threonine residues resulting in irreversible carbonylation in side chains and oxidation of methionine residue to form methionine sulphoxide. ROS production also limits CO2 fixation in chloroplasts which are the main site for ROS generation in green plants. ROS reacts with chlorophyll during photosynthesis and forms the chlorophyll triplet state which can rapidly generate (1O2), thus causing damage to photosynthetic complexes (principally PSII) and perturbing the molecular reaction of the photosynthetic pathway. Apart from the chloroplast, the mitochondria also increase ROS production under abiotic stress which influences plant cellular processes. In mitochondria, ~1–5% of O2 consumed leads to H2O2 formation which is subsequently transformed in •OH during the Fenton reaction. Furthermore, intensive respiratory/photorespiratory metabolism demands high electron input leading to escalated ROS production which results in protein oxidation. Peroxisomes are also major sites for ROS production, particularly H2O2, and have two- and 50-fold higher concentration of H2O2 than chloroplasts and mitochondria, respectively. This H2O2 is involved in stress induced oxidative damage given that it can freely pass lipid membranes. Under the physiological level, different antioxidant defense mechanism detoxify ROS. However, over production of ROS can overwhelm the defense system, resulting in oxidative stress, cell damage, and cell death (Figure 1).

5. Response and Role of Endogenous Phenolics in Plants against Abiotic Stress

In response to abiotic stresses, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, including polyphenols, is usually increased in plants. Phenolics confer indeed higher tolerance to plants against various stress conditions like heavy metals, salinity, drought, temperature, pesticides, and UV radiations. Plants growing under stressful environments have the ability to biosynthesize more phenolic compounds in comparison to plants growing under normal conditions. These compounds have antioxidative properties and are capable of scavenging free radicals, resulting in reduction of cell membrane peroxidation, hence protecting plant cells from ill effects of oxidative stress. Biosynthesis of phenolics under stressful environments is regulated by the altered activities of various key enzymes of phenolic biosynthetic pathways like PAL and CHS (chalcone synthase). Enhanced performance of enzymes is also accompanied by the up-regulation of the transcript levels of genes encoding key biosynthetic enzymes like PAL, C4H (cinnamate 4-hydroxylase), 4CL (4-coumarate: CoA ligase), CHS, CHI (chalcone isomerase), F3H (flavanone3-hydroxylase), F3′H (flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase), F3′5′H (flavonoid 3′5′-hydroxylase), DFR (dihydroflavonol 4-reductase), FLS (flavonol synthase), IFS (isoflavone synthase), IFR (isoflavone reductase), and UFGT (UDP flavonoid glycosyltransferase). The responses of phenolic compounds under different abiotic stresses have been discussed in individual sections mentioned below.

5.1. Heavy Metal

Metal stress causes oxidative stress to plants by triggering the generation of harmful ROSs and ultimately cause toxicity and retarded growth. However, enhanced biosynthesis of phenolics in plants under metal stress helps in protecting plants from oxidative stress. Flavonoids can enhance the metal chelation process which helps in reducing the levels of harmful hydroxyl radical in plant cells and this fits well with the observation that the levels of flavonoids in plants have found to be enhanced by metal excess. Under metal toxicity, accumulation of specific flavonoids which are involved in aiding to the plant’s defense mechanism is also enhanced including anthocyanins and flavonols. Accumulation of phenolic compounds is due to the up-regulation of the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid enzymes including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chalcone synthase, shikimate dehydrogenase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and polyphenol oxidase, which in turn, is dependent on the modulation of transcript levels of genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes under metal stress. Flavonoids are also known for their scavenging capability of H2O2 and are considered to play a crucial role in the phenolic/ascorbate-peroxidase cycle.

Shikimate dehydrogenase (SKDH) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) are two important enzymes which catalyze the biological reaction required for the production of important precursors of phenylpropanoid pathways. Another enzyme cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CADH) catalyzes biochemical reactions which produce precursors required for synthesis of lignin. Heavy metals stimulate phenylpropanoid the biosynthetic pathway in plants by up-regulating the activities of key biosynthetic enzymes like PAL, SKDH, G6PDH, and CADH. Additionally, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) helps during the process of ROS scavenging, and enhancing a plant’s resistance to abiotic stress conditions like heavy metals. Table 1 summarizes the impact of metal stress on phenolic composition of plants.

5.2. Drought

Phenolic accumulation is very crucial to counteract the negative impacts of drought stress in plants. Transcriptomic and metabolomic studies carried out on Arabidopsis plants confirmed that enhanced flavonoid accumulation under drought stress is very helpful to provide resistance. Biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonols were also stimulated in plants under water deficit conditions accompanied by enhanced resistance against drought stress. Drought stress also regulated the biosynthetic pathways of phenolic acids and flavonoids, leading to enhanced accumulation of these compounds which acted as antioxidants and prevented plants from adverse effects of water deficit conditions. For example, contents of flavonoids like kaempferol and quercetin were enhanced in tomato plants accompanied by enhanced drought tolerance. Flavonoid accumulation in cytoplasm can efficiently detoxify harmful H2O2 molecules generated as a result of drought stress and, at the end oxidation of flavonoids is followed by ascorbic acid mediated re-conversion of flavonoids into primary metabolites. The main reason for this drought-induced accumulation of phenolic compounds is the modulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway. Drought regulates many key genes encoding main enzymes of phenylpropanoid pathway, which results in stimulated biosynthesis of phenolic compounds. The impact of drought stress on accumulation of phenolics and related processes has been summarized in Table 2.

5.3. Salinity

Salt stress results in generation of ROS like superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl ions and require activation of well-orchestrated and finely-tuned plants antioxidant system to contrast ROS propagation. Phenolic compounds have powerful antioxidant properties and help in scavenging of harmful ROS in plants under salt stress. Moreover, in response to salt stress, phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway gets stimulated and results in production of various phenolic compounds which have strong antioxidative potential.

Some genes like VvbHLH1 are involved in the enhanced production of flavonoids by regulating the genes of the biosynthetic pathways and confer salt tolerance to plants. In tobacco plants, NtCHS1 plays a crucial role in the biosynthesis of flavonoids under salt stress, where accumulation directly favors the scavenging of ROS. Flavone biosynthesis also was enhanced under saline conditions and in Glycine max, it was observed that salinity up-regulates the expression of flavone synthase genes, GmFNSII-1 and GmFNSII-2. Some phenolic acids also accumulate in plants under saline conditions including caffeic acid, caftaric acid, cinnamylmalic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, and vanillic acid. Biosynthesis of anthocyanins also was promoted in plants growing under saline conditions. A detailed explanation about the effect of salt stress on phenolic composition has been provided in Table 3.

5.4. UV Light

Exposure of UV-B radiations to plants causes damage to their protein structure, causes harmful mutations to DNA and generates harmful ROS. To counteract the negative effects of UV-B exposure, endogenous phenolics accumulated in plant cells and protect cell components by making a shield under epidermal layer. They further reduce DNA damage by preventing dimerization of thymine along with reducing photo-damage of important enzymes like NAD/NADP. Moreover, flavonoids also act as light screens due to their capability of absorbing both visible (anthocyanins) and UV radiations (anthocyanins and colorless flavonoids), hence protecting plants from these harmful radiations. This fact was supported by various researchers who observed enhanced biosynthesis of flavonoids in plants under UV radiations, accompanied by enhanced UV absorption and plant tolerance to these radiations and powerful antioxidant capacity. Moreover, it is also well known that plants growing at high altitude accumulate more phenolics like flavonoids than plants of a temperate region. This enhanced flavonoid accumulation under high light/UV exposure is because of stimulated flavonoid biosynthetic pathways and their corresponding gene transcript levels. The key genes which are up-regulated in plants upon UV exposure include: CHS (chalcone synthase); CHI (chalcone isomerase); FLS (flavonol synthase); DFR (dihydroflavonol 4-reductase); FHT (flavanone 3β-hydroxylase), FGT (flavonoid glycosyltransferases); and PAL (phenylalanine ammonia lyase). It is also believed that UV light also utilizes jasmonate dependent/independent pathways to stimulate the biosynthesis of phenols in plants. Additionally, abscisic acid (ABA) is also known to modulate the phenolic biosynthetic pathway in presence of UV light. Table 4 provides a brief summary about impact of UV exposure on the endogenous phenolic composition of plants.

5.5. Other Abiotic Factors

Other abiotic factors like temperature, nanoparticles, and pesticides also stimulate the endogenous phenolic biosynthesis in plants and help in providing resistance against phytotoxic effects of these abiotic stresses. Phenolic biosynthetic pathways also get activated in plants growing under pesticide stress conditions. This leads to more accumulation of phenolic compounds in plants, which confer resistance to survive against pesticide toxicity. This stimulated phenolic biosynthesis is due to the activation of key biosynthetic enzymes and up-regulation of key genes of phenylpropanoid branch, including PAL and CHS. Increased accumulation of anthocyanins in plant leaves promote by application of insecticides also helps in recovery of plant photosynthetic efficiency. Similarly, under temperature stress (both heat and chilling), plants synthesize more phenolic compounds such as anthocyanins, flavonoids, flavonols, and phenolic acids, which ultimately protect plant cells. In Festuca trachyphylla plants growing under heat stress, enhancement in the phenolic compounds was noticed including 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, benzoic acid, caffeic acid, coumaric acid, cinnamic acid, gallic acid, homovanillic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, and vanillic acid. The increased accumulation of these phenolic compounds is accompanied by enhanced tolerance of F. trachyphylla plants against high temperature. In carrot, phenolics like coumaric acid, caffeic acid, and anthocyanins are suggested to prevent heat induced oxidative damage by enhancing their accumulation. Some phenolics like salicylic acid also act as stimulant for phenol biosynthesis in plants under high temperature stress. This leads to enhanced accumulation of phenolic compounds which further help in detoxification of ROS and providing heat resistance to plants. Under chilling stress, phenolic compounds like suberin or lignin start accumulating in plant cell walls which helps in enhancing resistance against chilling stress. This enhanced thickness of cell wall due to phenolic accumulation is beneficial for prevention of chilling injury and cell collapse under cold stress. Stimulated phenolic biosynthesis under low temperature stress is due to the enhanced expression of PAL, CAD (cinnamylalcohol dehydrogenase), and HCT (hydroxycinnamoyl transferase), and increased phenolic levels play crucial role in protection plants against chilling stress. This fact is further supported by the research carried out on peach under chilling stress by Gao et al.. These researchers suggested that 24-epibrassinolide stimulated biosynthesis of phenolics is involved in reduction of heat generated oxidative stress by helping to scavenge of ROS. Table 5 provides a detailed overview about how different abiotic factors affect phenolic metabolism in plants.

6. Conclusions

Phenylpropanoid pathway is likely the most studied pathway of secondary metabolism in planta. In plants growing under challenging environments, accumulation of phenolic compounds usually parallels enhanced plant tolerance as summarized in Figure 2. Abiotic stresses also activate the cell signaling process, resulting in transcriptional up-regulation of phenylpropanoid pathway. The increase in plant’s resistance is correlated with the multiple function of polyphenols in plants, principally consisting in their ROS scavenging ability and/or the capacity of some polyphenol classes to protect the plant from excessive light such as UV (flavonoids) and visible light (anthocyanins). In addition, polyphenols might play other key ecological roles under abiotic stress, acting for example as infochemicals for other plants. Aside from the huge body of papers on the matter, further research is needed to deepen, for example, the role of specialized polyphenols as a response to certain abiotic stresses and to describe the intimal mechanisms which shift from primary metabolism to the up-regulation of phenylpropanoid pathway, which is as a cross response to several environmental stressors.

References 182

  1. 1.

    Dresselhaus T., Hückelhoven R. Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Agronomy. 2018;8:267.

    Not in our library10.3390/agronomy8110267

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:15-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002

  4. 4.

    Kreps J.A., Wu Y., Chang H.-S., Zhu T., Wang X., Harper J.F. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:2129-2141.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.008532

  5. 5.

    Mittler R., Blumwald E. Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: Challenges and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010;61:443-462.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112116

  6. 6.

    Shao H.-B., Guo Q.-J., Chu L.-Y., Zhao X.-N., Su Z.-L., Hu Y.-C., Cheng J.-F. Understanding molecular mechanism of higher plant plasticity under abiotic stress. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2007;54:37-45.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.07.002

  7. 7.

    Anjum N.A., Gill S.S., Gill R. Plant Adaptation to Environmental Change: Significance of Amino Acids and Their Derivatives. 2014.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Anjum S.A., Tanveer M., Ashraf U., Hussain S., Shahzad B., Khan I., Wang L. Effect of progressive drought stress on growth, leaf gas exchange, and antioxidant production in two maize cultivars. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23:17132-17141.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-016-6894-8

  10. 10.

    Anjum S.A., Tanveer M., Hussain S., Bao M., Wang L., Khan I., Ullah E., Tung S.A., Samad R.A., Shahzad B. Cadmium toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.): Consequences on antioxidative systems, reactive oxygen species and cadmium accumulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015;22:17022-17030.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-015-4882-z

  11. 11.

    Shahzad B., Tanveer M., Che Z., Rehman A., Cheema S.A., Sharma A., Song H., Ur Rehman S., Zhaorong D. Role of 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) in mediating heavy metal and pesticide induced oxidative stress in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;147:935-944.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.066

  12. 12.

    Shahzad B., Tanveer M., Rehman A., Cheema S.A., Fahad S., Rehman S., Sharma A. Nickel; whether toxic or essential for plants and environment-A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018;132:641-651.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.10.014

  13. 13.

    Sharma A., Kumar V., Kumar R., Shahzad B., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R. Brassinosteroid-mediated pesticide detoxification in plants: A mini-review. Cogent Food Agric. 2018;4:1436212.

    Not in our library10.1080/23311932.2018.1436212

  14. 14.

    Fahad S., Rehman A., Shahzad B., Tanveer M., Saud S., Kamran M., Ihtisham M., Khan S.U., Turan V., Ur Rahman M.H. Rice Responses and Tolerance to Metal/Metalloid Toxicity. Advances in Rice Research for Abiotic Stress Tolerance. 2019;299-312.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Soares C., Carvalho M.E., Azevedo R.A., Fidalgo F. Plants facing oxidative challenges—A little help from the antioxidant networks. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019;161:4-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.009

  16. 16.

    Guo H., Feng X., Hong C., Chen H., Zeng F., Zheng B., Jiang D. Malate secretion from the root system is an important reason for higher resistance of Miscanthus sacchariflorus to cadmium. Physiol. Planta. 2017;159:340-353.

    Not in our library10.1111/ppl.12526

  17. 17.

    Guo H., Chen H., Hong C., Jiang D., Zheng B. Exogenous malic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity in Miscanthus sacchariflorus through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and restraining ROS accumulation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017;141:119-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.018

  18. 18.

    Chen X., Qiu L., Guo H., Wang Y., Yuan H., Yan D., Zheng B. Spermidine induces physiological and biochemical changes in southern highbush blueberry under drought stress. Braz. J. Bot. 2017;40:841-851.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40415-017-0401-4

  19. 19.

    Khan M.I.R., Khan N.A. Salicylic acid and jasmonates: Approaches in abiotic stress tolerance. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 2013;1:4.

    Not in our library10.4172/2329-9029.1000e113

  20. 20.

    Rao K.M., Raghavendra A., Reddy K.J. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress Tolerance in Plants. 2006.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Kaur G., Kumar S., Nayyar H., Upadhyaya H. Cold stress injury during the pod-filling phase in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Effects on quantitative and qualitative components of seeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2008;194:457-464.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Mantri N., Patade V., Penna S., Ford R., Pang E. Abiotic stress responses in plants: Present and future. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. 2012;1-19.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Sharma P., Jha A.B., Dubey R.S., Pessarakli M. Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. J. Bot. 2012;2012:26.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/217037

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Lattanzio V., Ramawat K.G., Mérillon J.-M. Phenolic Compounds: Introduction. Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes. 2013;1543-1580.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-22144-6_57

  27. 27.

    Raskin I. Role of salicylic acid in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 1992;43:439-463.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.002255

  28. 28.

    Yalpani N., Enyedi A.J., León J., Raskin I. Ultraviolet light and ozone stimulate accumulation of salicylic acid, pathogenesis-related proteins and virus resistance in tobacco. Planta. 1994;193:372-376.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00201815

  29. 29.

    Senaratna T., Touchell D., Bunn E., Dixon K. Acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin) and salicylic acid induce multiple stress tolerance in bean and tomato plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2000;30:157-161.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1006386800974

  30. 30.

    Nazar R., Iqbal N., Syeed S., Khan N.A. Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:807-815.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001

  31. 31.

    Cheynier V., Comte G., Davies K.M., Lattanzio V., Martens S. Plant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013;72:1-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.009

  32. 32.

    Saltveit M.E. Synthesis and metabolism of phenolic compounds. Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals Chemistry, Nutritional Value, and Stability. 2010.

    Not in our library10.1002/9781119158042.ch9781119158045

  33. 33.

    Naikoo M.I., Dar M.I., Raghib F., Jaleel H., Ahmad B., Raina A., Khan F.A., Naushin F. Role and Regulation of Plants Phenolics in Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Overview. Plant Signaling Molecules. 2019;157-168.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Boudet A.M. Evolution and current status of research in phenolic compounds. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:2722-2735.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.06.012

  35. 35.

    Kumar V., Sharma A., Kohli S.K., Bali S., Sharma M., Kumar R., Bhardwaj R., Thukral A.K. Differential distribution of polyphenols in plants using multivariate techniques. Biotech. Res. Innov. 2019;3:1-21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biori.2019.03.001

  36. 36.

    Tanase C., Bujor O.-C., Popa V.I., Watson R.R. Phenolic Natural Compounds and Their Influence on Physiological Processes in Plants. Polyphenols in Plants. 2019;45-58.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-813768-0.00003-7

  37. 37.

    Bujor O.-C., Talmaciu I.A., Volf I., Popa V.I. Biorefining to recover aromatic compounds with biological properties. TAPPI J. 2015;14:187-193.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Andersen C.P. Source–sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytol. 2003;157:213-228.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00674.x

  39. 39.

    Lattanzio V., Cardinali A., Ruta C., Fortunato I.M., Lattanzio V.M.T., Linsalata V., Cicco N. Relationship of secondary metabolism to growth in oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) shoot cultures under nutritional stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009;65:54-62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.09.002

  40. 40.

    Dixon R.A., Paiva N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1085.

    Not in our library10.2307/3870059

  41. 41.

    Oszmanski J. Polyphenols as antioxidants in food. Przem. Spo. 1995;3:94-96.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Halvorson J.J., Gonzalez J.M., Hagerman A.E., Smith J.L. Sorption of tannin and related phenolic compounds and effects on soluble-N in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009;41:2002-2010.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.006

  43. 43.

    Seneviratne G., Jayasinghearachchi H.S. Mycelial colonization by bradyrhizobia and azorhizobia. J. Biosci. 2003;28:243-247.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02706224

  44. 44.

    Rehman A., Farooq M., Naveed M., Nawaz A., Shahzad B. Seed priming of Zn with endophytic bacteria improves the productivity and grain biofortification of bread wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 2018;94:98-107.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.017

  45. 45.

    Rehman A., Farooq M., Naveed M., Ozturk L., Nawaz A. Pseudomonas aided zinc application improves the productivity and biofortification of bread wheat. Crop Pasture Sci. 2018;69:659-672.

    Not in our library10.1071/cp17441

  46. 46.

    Zhang J., Subramanian S., Stacey G., Yu O. Flavones and flavonols play distinct critical roles during nodulation of Medicago truncatula by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant J. 2009;57:171-183.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03676.x

  47. 47.

    Mathesius U. Flavonoids induced in cells undergoing nodule organogenesis in white clover are regulators of auxin breakdown by peroxidase. J. Exp. Bot. 2001;52:419-426.

    Not in our library10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.419

  48. 48.

    Van Der Meer I.M., Stam M.E., Van Tunen A.J., Mol J.N., Stuitje A.R. Antisense inhibition of flavonoid biosynthesis in petunia anthers results in male sterility. Plant Cell. 1992;4:253-262.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.4.3.253

  49. 49.

    Taylor L.P., Grotewold E. Flavonoids as developmental regulators. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005;8:317-323.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.005

  50. 50.

    Baleroni C.R.S., Ferrarese M.L.L., Souza N.E., Ferrarese-Filho O. Lipid Accumulation during Canola Seed Germination in Response to Cinnamic Acid Derivatives. Biol. Planta. 2000;43:313-316.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1002789218415

  51. 51.

    Shankar S., Girish R., Karthik N., Rajendran R., Mahendran V. Allelopathic effects of phenolics and terpenoids extracted from Gimelina arborea on germination of Black gram (Vigna mungo) and Green gram (Vigna radiata). Allelopath. J. 2009;23:323-332.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Chen Z., Yu L., Wang X., Gu Z., Beta T. Changes of phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity in canaryseed (Phalaris canariensis L.) during germination. Food Chem. 2016;194:608-618.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.060

  53. 53.

    Balas A., Popa V. Bioactive compounds extracted from Picea abies bark. Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp. 345-356.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    Tobe K., Zhang L., Qiu G.Y., Shimizu H., Omasa K. Characteristics of seed germination in five non-halophytic Chinese desert shrub species. J. Arid. Environ. 2001;47:191-201.

    Not in our library10.1006/jare.2000.0689

  55. 55.

    Tanase C., Boz I., Stingu A., Volf I., Popa V.I. Physiological and biochemical responses induced by spruce bark aqueous extract and deuterium depleted water with synergistic action in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014;60:160-167.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.05.039

  56. 56.

    Tanase C., Bara C.I., Popa V.I. Cytogenetical effect of some polyphenol compounds separated from industrial by-products on. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2015;49:799-805.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Moreland D.E., Novitzky W.P. Effects of Phenolic Acids, Coumarins, and Flavonoids on Isolated Chloroplasts and Mitochondria. Allelochemicals: Role in Agriculture and Forestry. 1987;247-261.

    Not in our library10.1021/bk-1987-0330.ch023

  58. 58.

    Amarowicz R., Weidner S. Biological activity of grapevine phenolic compounds. Grapevine Molecular Physiology & Biotechnology. 2009;389-405.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Wani S.H., Sah S. Biotechnology and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. J. Rice Res. 2014;2:e105.

    Not in our library10.4172/jrr.1000e105

  60. 60.

    Noctor G., Reichheld J.-P., Foyer C.H. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;80:3-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013

  61. 61.

    Farooq M.A., Niazi A.K., Akhtar J., Farooq M., Souri Z., Karimi N., Rengel Z. Acquiring control: The evolution of ROS-Induced oxidative stress and redox signaling pathways in plant stress responses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019;141:353-369.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.04.039

  62. 62.

    Suzuki N., Koussevitzky S., Mittler R., Miller G. ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:259-270.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x

  63. 63.

    Rehman A., Farooq M., Asif M., Ozturk L. Supra-optimal growth temperature exacerbates adverse effects of low Zn supply in wheat. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2019.

    Not in our library10.1002/jpln.201800654

  64. 64.

    Corpas F.J., Barroso J.B., Palma J.M., Rodriguez-Ruiz M. Plant peroxisomes: A nitro-oxidative cocktail. Redox Biol. 2017;11:535-542.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.033

  65. 65.

    Gill S.S., Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010;48:909-930.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016

  66. 66.

    Kristensen B.K., Askerlund P., Bykova N.V., Egsgaard H., Moller I.M. Identification of oxidised proteins in the matrix of rice leaf mitochondria by immunoprecipitation and two-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:1839-1851.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.007

  67. 67.

    Asada K. Production and Scavenging of Reactive Oxygen Species in Chloroplasts and Their Functions. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:391-396.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.106.082040

  68. 68.

    Buchert F., Forreiter C. Singlet oxygen inhibits ATPase and proton translocation activity of the thylakoid ATP synthase CF1CFo. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:147-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.040

  69. 69.

    Popov V.N., Simonian R.A., Skulachev V.P., Starkov A.A. Inhibition of the alternative oxidase stimulates H2O2 production in plant mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1997;415:87-90.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01099-5

  70. 70.

    Foyer C.H., Bloom A.J., Queval G., Noctor G. Photorespiratory metabolism: Genes, mutants, energetics, and redox signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009;60:455-484.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.091948

  71. 71.

    Halliwell B. Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:312-322.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.106.077073

  72. 72.

    Handa N., Kohli S.K., Sharma A., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R., Abd_Allah E.F., Alqarawi A.A., Ahmad P. Selenium modulates dynamics of antioxidative defence expression, photosynthetic attributes and secondary metabolites to mitigate chromium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019;161:180-192.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.11.009

  73. 73.

    Sharma A., Kumar V., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R. Epibrassinolide-imidacloprid interaction enhances non-enzymatic antioxidants in Brassica juncea L. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2016;21:70-75.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40502-016-0203-x

  74. 74.
  75. 75.

    Ancillotti C., Bogani P., Biricolti S., Calistri E., Checchini L., Ciofi L., Gonnelli C., Del Bubba M. Changes in polyphenol and sugar concentrations in wild type and genetically modified Nicotiana langsdorffii Weinmann in response to water and heat stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015;97:52-61.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.09.012

  76. 76.

    Wang J., Yuan B., Huang B. Differential Heat-Induced Changes in Phenolic Acids Associated with Genotypic Variations in Heat Tolerance for Hard Fescue. Crop Sci. 2019;59:667-674.

    Not in our library10.2135/cropsci2018.01.0063

  77. 77.

    Smirnov O.E., Kosyan A.M., Kosyk O.I., Taran N.Y. Response of phenolic metabolism induced by aluminium toxicity in Fagopyrum esculentum moench. plants. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2015;87:129-135.

    Not in our library10.15407/ubj87.06.129

  78. 78.

    Selmar D. Potential of salt and drought stress to increase pharmaceutical significant secondary compounds in plants. Landbauforschung Volkenrode. 2008;58:139.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Schroeter H., Boyd C., Spencer J.P., Williams R.J., Cadenas E., Rice-Evans C. MAPK signaling in neurodegeneration: Influences of flavonoids and of nitric oxide. Neurobiol. Aging. 2002;23:861-880.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00075-1

  80. 80.

    Sharma A., Yuan H., Kumar V., Ramakrishnan M., Kohli S.K., Kaur R., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R., Zheng B. Castasterone attenuates insecticide induced phytotoxicity in mustard. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;179:50-61.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.120

  81. 81.

    Perin E.C., Da Silva Messias R., Borowski J.M., Crizel R.L., Schott I.B., Carvalho I.R., Rombaldi C.V., Galli V. ABA-dependent salt and drought stress improve strawberry fruit quality. Food Chem. 2019;271:516-526.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.213

  82. 82.

    Gharibi S., Sayed Tabatabaei B.E., Saeidi G., Talebi M., Matkowski A. The effect of drought stress on polyphenolic compounds and expression of flavonoid biosynthesis related genes in Achillea pachycephala Rech.f. Phytochemistry. 2019;162:90-98.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.03.004

  83. 83.

    Chen Z., Ma Y., Yang R., Gu Z., Wang P. Effects of exogenous Ca2+ on phenolic accumulation and physiological changes in germinated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under UV-B radiation. Food Chem. 2019;288:368-376.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.131

  84. 84.

    Ma D., Sun D., Wang C., Li Y., Guo T. Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and accumulation of flavonoid in wheat leaves in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014;80:60-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.024

  85. 85.

    Leng X., Jia H., Sun X., Shangguan L., Mu Q., Wang B., Fang J. Comparative transcriptome analysis of grapevine in response to copper stress. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17749.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep17749

  86. 86.

    Zhou P., Li Q., Liu G., Xu N., Yang Y., Zeng W., Chen A., Wang S. Integrated analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data reveals critical metabolic pathways involved in polyphenol biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum under chilling stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018;46:30-43.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp18099

  87. 87.

    Pandey N., Sharma C.P. Effect of heavy metals Co2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ on growth and metabolism of cabbage. Plant Sci. 2002;163:753-758.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-9452(02)00210-8

  88. 88.

    Villiers F., Ducruix C., Hugouvieux V., Jarno N., Ezan E., Garin J., Junot C., Bourguignon J. Investigating the plant response to cadmium exposure by proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Proteomics. 2011;11:1650-1663.

    Not in our library10.1002/pmic.201000645

  89. 89.

    Kohli S.K., Handa N., Sharma A., Gautam V., Arora S., Bhardwaj R., Wijaya L., Alyemeni M.N., Ahmad P. Interaction of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid regulates pigment contents, antioxidative defense responses, and gene expression in Brassica juncea L. seedlings under Pb stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:15159-15173.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-018-1742-7

  90. 90.

    Kaur R., Yadav P., Sharma A., Kumar Thukral A., Kumar V., Kaur Kohli S., Bhardwaj R. Castasterone and citric acid treatment restores photosynthetic attributes in Brassica juncea L. under Cd(II) toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017;145:466-475.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.067

  91. 91.

    Mira L., Fernandez M.T., Santos M., Rocha R., Florencio M.H., Jennings K.R. Interactions of flavonoids with iron and copper ions: A mechanism for their antioxidant activity. Free Radic. Res. 2002;36:1199-1208.

    Not in our library10.1080/1071576021000016463

  92. 92.

    Williams R.J., Spencer J.P., Rice-Evans C. Flavonoids: Antioxidants or signalling molecules? Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2004;36:838-849.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.01.001

  93. 93.

    Handa N., Kohli S.K., Sharma A., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R., Alyemeni M.N., Wijaya L., Ahmad P. Selenium ameliorates chromium toxicity through modifications in pigment system, antioxidative capacity, osmotic system, and metal chelators in Brassica juncea seedlings. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018;119:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.003

  94. 94.

    Trejo-Tapia G., Jimenez-Aparicio A., Rodriguez-Monroy M., De Jesus-Sanchez A., Gutierrez-Lopez G. Influence of cobalt and other microelements on the production of betalains and the growth of suspension cultures of Beta vulgaris. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2001;67:19-23.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1011684619614

  95. 95.

    Zafari S., Sharifi M., Ahmadian Chashmi N., Mur L.A. Modulation of Pb-induced stress in Prosopis shoots through an interconnected network of signaling molecules, phenolic compounds and amino acids. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;99:11-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.12.004

  96. 96.

    Kısa D., Elmastaş M., Öztürk L., Kayır Ö. Responses of the phenolic compounds of Zea mays under heavy metal stress. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2016;59:813-820.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13765-016-0229-9

  97. 97.

    Chen S., Wang Q., Lu H., Li J., Yang D., Liu J., Yan C. Phenolic metabolism and related heavy metal tolerance mechanism in Kandelia Obovata under Cd and Zn stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;169:134-143.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.004

  98. 98.

    Michalak A. Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2006;15:523-530.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    Keilig K., Ludwig-Mueller J. Effect of flavonoids on heavy metal tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Bot. Stud. 2009;50:311-318.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Kováčik J., Klejdus B., Hedbavny J., Štork F., Bačkor M. Comparison of cadmium and copper effect on phenolic metabolism, mineral nutrients and stress-related parameters in Matricaria chamomilla plants. Plant Soil. 2009;320:231.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11104-009-9889-0

  101. 101.

    Mishra B., Sangwan N.S. Amelioration of cadmium stress in Withania somnifera by ROS management: Active participation of primary and secondary metabolism. Plant Growth Regul. 2019;87:403-412.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10725-019-00480-8

  102. 102.

    Mishra B., Sangwan R.S., Mishra S., Jadaun J.S., Sabir F., Sangwan N.S. Effect of cadmium stress on inductive enzymatic and nonenzymatic responses of ROS and sugar metabolism in multiple shoot cultures of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera Dunal). Protoplasma. 2014;251:1031-1045.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-014-0613-4

  103. 103.

    Poonam R.K., Bhardwaj R., Sirhindi G. Castasterone regulated polyphenolic metabolism and photosynthetic system in Brassica juncea plants under copper stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2015;4:282-289.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Kaur P., Bali S., Sharma A., Vig A.P., Bhardwaj R. Effect of earthworms on growth, photosynthetic efficiency and metal uptake in Brassica juncea L. plants grown in cadmium-polluted soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:13452-13465.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-017-8947-z

  105. 105.

    Kaur P., Bali S., Sharma A., Vig A.P., Bhardwaj R. Role of earthworms in phytoremediation of cadmium (Cd) by modulating the antioxidative potential of Brassica juncea L. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018;124:306-316.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.017

  106. 106.

    Kohli S.K., Handa N., Sharma A., Kumar V., Kaur P., Bhardwaj R. Synergistic effect of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid on photosynthetic efficiency and gene expression in Brassica juncea L. under Pb stress. Turk. J. Biol. 2017;41:943-953.

    Not in our library10.3906/biy-1707-15

  107. 107.

    Nakabayashi R., Yonekura-Sakakibara K., Urano K., Suzuki M., Yamada Y., Nishizawa T., Matsuda F., Kojima M., Sakakibara H., Shinozaki K., et al. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 2014;77:367-379.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.12388

  108. 108.

    Kirakosyan A., Seymour E., Kaufman P.B., Warber S., Bolling S., Chang S.C. Antioxidant capacity of polyphenolic extracts from leaves of Crataegus laevigata and Crataegus monogyna (Hawthorn) subjected to drought and cold stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:3973-3976.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf030096r

  109. 109.

    Ballizany W.L., Hofmann R.W., Jahufer M.Z.Z., Barrett B.A. Multivariate associations of flavonoid and biomass accumulation in white clover (Trifolium repens) under drought. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012;39:167-177.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp11193

  110. 110.

    Rezayian M., Niknam V., Ebrahimzadeh H. Differential responses of phenolic compounds of Brassica napus under drought stress. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2018;8:2417-2425.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Li M., Li Y., Zhang W., Li S., Gao Y., Ai X., Zhang D., Liu B., Li Q. Metabolomics analysis reveals that elevated atmospheric CO2 alleviates drought stress in cucumber seedling leaves. Anal. Biochem. 2018;559:71-85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2018.08.020

  112. 112.

    Nichols S.N., Hofmann R.W., Williams W.M. Physiological drought resistance and accumulation of leaf phenolics in white clover interspecific hybrids. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015;119:40-47.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.014

  113. 113.

    Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Moreno D.A., Ferreres F., Rubio-Wilhelmi Mdel M., Ruiz J.M. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: Changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:723-729.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.011

  114. 114.

    Hernandez I., Alegre L., Van Breusegem F., Munne-Bosch S. How relevant are flavonoids as antioxidants in plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:125-132.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.003

  115. 115.

    Gharibi S., Tabatabaei B.E., Saeidi G., Goli S.A. Effect of Drought Stress on Total Phenolic, Lipid Peroxidation, and Antioxidant Activity of Achillea Species. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016;178:796-809.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12010-015-1909-3

  116. 116.

    Hodaei M., Rahimmalek M., Arzani A., Talebi M. The effect of water stress on phytochemical accumulation, bioactive compounds and expression of key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum morifolium L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018;120:295-304.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.073

  117. 117.

    Galieni A., Di Mattia C., De Gregorio M., Speca S., Mastrocola D., Pisante M., Stagnari F. Effects of nutrient deficiency and abiotic environmental stresses on yield, phenolic compounds and antiradical activity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci. Hortic. 2015;187:93-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.036

  118. 118.

    Varela M.C., Arslan I., Reginato M.A., Cenzano A.M., Luna M.V. Phenolic compounds as indicators of drought resistance in shrubs from Patagonian shrublands (Argentina). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;104:81-91.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.03.014

  119. 119.

    Garcia-Calderon M., Pons-Ferrer T., Mrazova A., Pal’ove-Balang P., Vilkova M., Perez-Delgado C.M., Vega J.M., Eliasova A., Repcak M., Marquez A.J., et al. Modulation of phenolic metabolism under stress conditions in a Lotus japonicus mutant lacking plastidic glutamine synthetase. Front. Plant Sci. 2015;6:760.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2015.00760

  120. 120.

    Silva F.L.B., Vieira L.G.E., Ribas A.F., Moro A.L., Neris D.M., Pacheco A.C. Proline accumulation induces the production of total phenolics in transgenic tobacco plants under water deficit without increasing the G6PDH activity. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2018;30:251-260.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40626-018-0119-0

  121. 121.

    Ghasemi Pirbalouti A., Malekpoor F., Salimi A., Golparvar A. Exogenous application of chitosan on biochemical and physiological characteristics, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of two species of basil (Ocimum ciliatum and Ocimum basilicum) under reduced irrigation. Sci. Hortic. 2017;217:114-122.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scienta.2017.01.031

  122. 122.

    Khalil N., Fekry M., Bishr M., El-Zalabani S., Salama O. Foliar spraying of salicylic acid induced accumulation of phenolics, increased radical scavenging activity and modified the composition of the essential oil of water stressed Thymus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018;123:65-74.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.007

  123. 123.

    Kaur L., Zhawar V.K. Phenolic parameters under exogenous ABA, water stress, salt stress in two wheat cultivars varying in drought tolerance. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2015;20:151-156.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40502-015-0156-5

  124. 124.

    Griesser M., Weingart G., Schoedl-Hummel K., Neumann N., Becker M., Varmuza K., Liebner F., Schuhmacher R., Forneck A. Severe drought stress is affecting selected primary metabolites, polyphenols, and volatile metabolites in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015;88:17-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.01.004

  125. 125.

    Castellarin S.D., Pfeiffer A., Sivilotti P., Degan M., Peterlunger E., Di Gaspero G. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in ripening fruits of grapevine under seasonal water deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:1381-1399.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01716.x

  126. 126.

    Taïbi K., Taïbi F., Ait Abderrahim L., Ennajah A., Belkhodja M., Mulet J.M. Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016;105:306-312.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.011

  127. 127.
  128. 128.

    De Azevedo Neto A.D., Prisco J.T., Enéas-Filho J., Abreu C.E.B.D., Gomes-Filho E. Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006;56:87-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008

  129. 129.
  130. 130.
  131. 131.

    Bistgani Z.E., Hashemi M., DaCosta M., Craker L., Maggi F., Morshedloo M.R. Effect of salinity stress on the physiological characteristics, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus daenensis Celak. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;135:311-320.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.055

  132. 132.

    Valifard M., Mohsenzadeh S., Kholdebarin B., Rowshan V. Effects of salt stress on volatile compounds, total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Salvia mirzayanii. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014;93:92-97.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sajb.2014.04.002

  133. 133.

    Rossi L., Borghi M., Francini A., Lin X., Xie D.Y., Sebastiani L. Salt stress induces differential regulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in Olea europaea cultivars Frantoio (salt-tolerant) and Leccino (salt-sensitive). J. Plant Physiol. 2016;204:8-15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2016.07.014

  134. 134.

    Al-Ghamdi A.A., Elansary H.O. Synergetic effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid and Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extracts on Asparagus phenolics and stress related genes under saline irrigation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018;129:273-284.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.008

  135. 135.

    Golkar P., Taghizadeh M. In vitro evaluation of phenolic and osmolite compounds, ionic content, and antioxidant activity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under salinity stress. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2018;134:357-368.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11240-018-1427-4

  136. 136.

    Wang F., Zhu H., Chen D., Li Z., Peng R., Yao Q. A grape bHLH transcription factor gene, VvbHLH1, increases the accumulation of flavonoids and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2016;125:387-398.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11240-016-0953-1

  137. 137.

    Yan J., Wang B., Jiang Y., Cheng L., Wu T. GmFNSII-controlled soybean flavone metabolism responds to abiotic stresses and regulates plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55:74-86.

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pct159

  138. 138.

    Ben-Abdallah S., Zorrig W., Amyot L., Renaud J., Hannoufa A., Lachâal M., Karray-Bouraoui N. Potential production of polyphenols, carotenoids and glycoalkaloids in Solanum villosum Mill. under salt stress. Biologia. 2019;74:309-324.

    Not in our library10.2478/s11756-018-00166-y

  139. 139.

    Scagel C.F., Lee J., Mitchell J.N. Salinity from NaCl changes the nutrient and polyphenolic composition of basil leaves. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;127:119-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.048

  140. 140.
  141. 141.

    Dkhil B.B., Denden M. Effect of salt stress on growth, anthocyanins, membrane permeability and chlorophyll fluorescence of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) seedlings. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2012;7:174-183.

    Not in our library10.3923/ajpp.2012.174.183

  142. 142.

    Eryılmaz F. The Relationships between Salt Stress and Anthocyanin Content in Higher Plants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2006;20:47-52.

    Not in our library10.1080/13102818.2006.10817303

  143. 143.

    Aloisi I., Parrotta L., Ruiz K.B., Landi C., Bini L., Cai G., Biondi S., Del Duca S. New Insight into Quinoa Seed Quality under Salinity: Changes in Proteomic and Amino Acid Profiles, Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Protein Extracts. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:656.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2016.00656

  144. 144.

    Lucini L., Borgognone D., Rouphael Y., Cardarelli M., Bernardi J., Colla G. Mild Potassium Chloride Stress Alters the Mineral Composition, Hormone Network, and Phenolic Profile in Artichoke Leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:948.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2016.00948

  145. 145.

    Ma Y., Wang P., Gu Z., Tao Y., Shen C., Zhou Y., Han Y., Yang R. Ca2+ involved in GABA signal transduction for phenolics accumulation in germinated hulless barley under NaCl stress. Food Chem. X. 2019;2:100023.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100023

  146. 146.

    Çoban Ö., Göktürk Baydar N. Brassinosteroid effects on some physical and biochemical properties and secondary metabolite accumulation in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) under salt stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016;86:251-258.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.049

  147. 147.

    Valifard M., Mohsenzadeh S., Niazi A., Moghadam A. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase isolation and functional analysis of phenylpropanoid pathway under salinity stress in ‘Salvia’ species. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2015;9:656-665.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    Daayf F., Lattanzio V. Recent Advances in Polyphenol Research. 2009.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Landi M., Tattini M., Gould K.S. Multiple functional roles of anthocyanins in plant-environment interactions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015;119:4-17.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.012

  150. 150.

    Agati G., Tattini M. Multiple functional roles of flavonoids in photoprotection. New Phytol. 2010;186:786-793.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03269.x

  151. 151.

    Agati G., Azzarello E., Pollastri S., Tattini M. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: Location and functional significance. Plant Sci. 2012;196:67-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.014

  152. 152.

    Kolb C.A., Kaser M.A., Kopecky J., Zotz G., Riederer M., Pfundel E.E. Effects of natural intensities of visible and ultraviolet radiation on epidermal ultraviolet screening and photosynthesis in grape leaves. Plant. Physiol. 2001;127:863-875.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.010373

  153. 153.

    Ghasemi S., Kumleh H.H., Kordrostami M. Changes in the expression of some genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in Cuminum cyminum L. under UV stress. Protoplasma. 2019;256:279-290.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-018-1297-y

  154. 154.

    Goyal A., Siddiqui S., Upadhyay N., Soni J. Effects of ultraviolet irradiation, pulsed electric field, hot water and ethanol vapours treatment on functional properties of mung bean sprouts. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014;51:708-714.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13197-011-0538-2

  155. 155.

    Xu Y., Charles M.T., Luo Z., Mimee B., Veronneau P.Y., Rolland D., Roussel D. Preharvest Ultraviolet C Irradiation Increased the Level of Polyphenol Accumulation and Flavonoid Pathway Gene Expression in Strawberry Fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017;65:9970-9979.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04252

  156. 156.

    Demkura P.V., Abdala G., Baldwin I.T., Ballare C.L. Jasmonate-dependent and -independent pathways mediate specific effects of solar ultraviolet B radiation on leaf phenolics and antiherbivore defense. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:1084-1095.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.109.148999

  157. 157.

    Berli F.J., Fanzone M., Piccoli P., Bottini R. Solar UV-B and ABA are involved in phenol metabolism of Vitis vinifera L. increasing biosynthesis of berry skin polyphenols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:4874-4884.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf200040z

  158. 158.

    Nenadis N., Llorens L., Koufogianni A., Diaz L., Font J., Gonzalez J.A., Verdaguer D. Interactive effects of UV radiation and reduced precipitation on the seasonal leaf phenolic content/composition and the antioxidant activity of naturally growing Arbutus unedo plants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2015;153:435-444.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.10.016

  159. 159.

    Moreira-Rodriguez M., Nair V., Benavides J., Cisneros-Zevallos L., Jacobo-Velazquez D.A. UVA, UVB Light, and Methyl Jasmonate, Alone or Combined, Redirect the Biosynthesis of Glucosinolates, Phenolics, Carotenoids, and Chlorophylls in Broccoli Sprouts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2330.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18112330

  160. 160.

    Liu M., Cao B., Zhou S., Liu Y. Responses of the flavonoid pathway to UV-B radiation stress and the correlation with the lipid antioxidant characteristics in the desert plant Caryopteris mongolica. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012;32:150-155.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chnaes.2012.04.004

  161. 161.

    Nascimento L., Leal-Costa M.V., Menezes E.A., Lopes V.R., Muzitano M.F., Costa S.S., Tavares E.S. Ultraviolet-B radiation effects on phenolic profile and flavonoid content of Kalanchoe pinnata. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2015;148:73-81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.03.011

  162. 162.

    Sytar O., Zivcak M., Bruckova K., Brestic M., Hemmerich I., Rauh C., Simko I. Shift in accumulation of flavonoids and phenolic acids in lettuce attributable to changes in ultraviolet radiation and temperature. Sci. Hortic. 2018;239:193-204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.020

  163. 163.

    Lee M.J., Son J.E., Oh M.M. Growth and phenolic compounds of Lactuca sativa L. grown in a closed-type plant production system with UV-A, -B, or -C lamp. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014;94:197-204.

    Not in our library10.1002/jsfa.6227

  164. 164.

    Huyskens-Keil S., Eichholz I., Kroh L., Rohn S. UV-B induced changes of phenol composition and antioxidant activity in black currant fruit (Ribes nigrum L.). J. App. Bot. Food Qual. 2012;81:140-144.

    Not in our library

  165. 165.

    Mariz-Ponte N., Mendes R.J., Sario S., De Oliveira J.F., Melo P., Santos C. Tomato plants use non-enzymatic antioxidant pathways to cope with moderate UV-A/B irradiation: A contribution to the use of UV-A/B in horticulture. J. Plant Physiol. 2018;221:32-42.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2017.11.013

  166. 166.

    Chen Z., Ma Y., Weng Y., Yang R., Gu Z., Wang P. Effects of UV-B radiation on phenolic accumulation, antioxidant activity and physiological changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Food Biosci. 2019;30:100409.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fbio.2019.04.010

  167. 167.

    Alonso R., Berli F.J., Fontana A., Piccoli P., Bottini R. Malbec grape (Vitis vinifera L.) responses to the environment: Berry phenolics as influenced by solar UV-B, water deficit and sprayed abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;109:84-90.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.007

  168. 168.

    Swieca M. Elicitation with abiotic stresses improves pro-health constituents, antioxidant potential and nutritional quality of lentil sprouts. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015;22:409-416.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.007

  169. 169.

    Wang L., Shan T., Xie B., Ling C., Shao S., Jin P., Zheng Y. Glycine betaine reduces chilling injury in peach fruit by enhancing phenolic and sugar metabolisms. Food Chem. 2019;272:530-538.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.085

  170. 170.

    Mahdavi V., Farimani M.M., Fathi F., Ghassempour A. A targeted metabolomics approach toward understanding metabolic variations in rice under pesticide stress. Anal. Biochem. 2015;478:65-72.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2015.02.021

  171. 171.

    Korosi L., Bouderias S., Csepregi K., Bognar B., Teszlak P., Scarpellini A., Castelli A., Hideg E., Jakab G. Nanostructured TiO2-induced photocatalytic stress enhances the antioxidant capacity and phenolic content in the leaves of Vitis vinifera on a genotype-dependent manner. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2019;190:137-145.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.11.010

  172. 172.

    Sharma A., Kumar V., Singh R., Thukral A.K., Bhardwaj R. Effect of seed pre-soaking with 24-epibrassinolide on growth and photosynthetic parameters of Brassica juncea L. in imidacloprid soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016;133:195-201.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.008

  173. 173.

    Zlotek U., Szymanowska U., Baraniak B., Karas M. Antioxidant activity of polyphenols of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) germinated in abiotic stress conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2015;14:55-63.

    Not in our library10.17306/j.afs.2015.1.6

  174. 174.

    Commisso M., Toffali K., Strazzer P., Stocchero M., Ceoldo S., Baldan B., Levi M., Guzzo F. Impact of phenylpropanoid compounds on heat stress tolerance in carrot cell cultures. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1439.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2016.01439

  175. 175.

    Cingoz G.S., Gurel E. Effects of salicylic acid on thermotolerance and cardenolide accumulation under high temperature stress in Digitalis trojana Ivanina. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;105:145-149.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.023

  176. 176.

    Griffith M., Yaish M.W. Antifreeze proteins in overwintering plants: A tale of two activities. Trends Plant. Sci. 2004;9:399-405.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2004.06.007

  177. 177.

    Gao H., Zhang Z., Lv X., Cheng N., Peng B., Cao W. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on chilling injury of peach fruit in relation to phenolic and proline metabolisms. Post. Biol. Technol. 2016;111:390-397.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.07.031

  178. 178.

    Sharma A., Kumar V., Yuan H., Kanwar M.K., Bhardwaj R., Thukral A.K., Zheng B. Jasmonic Acid Seed Treatment Stimulates Insecticide Detoxification in Brassica juncea L. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:1609.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2018.01609

  179. 179.

    Nourozi E., Hosseini B., Maleki R., Mandoulakani B.A. Pharmaceutical important phenolic compounds overproduction and gene expression analysis in Dracocephalum kotschyi hairy roots elicited by SiO2 nanoparticles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;133:435-446.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.053

  180. 180.

    Girilal M., Fayaz A.M., Elumalai L.K., Sathiyaseelan A., Gandhiappan J., Kalaichelvan P.T. Comparative Stress Physiology Analysis of Biologically and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles on Solanum lycopersicum L. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2018;24:1-6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colcom.2018.02.005

  181. 181.

    Raigond P., Raigond B., Kaundal B., Singh B., Joshi A., Dutt S. Effect of zinc nanoparticles on antioxidative system of potato plants. J. Environ. Biol. 2017;38:435-439.

    Not in our library10.22438/jeb/38/3/ms-209

  182. 182.

    Singh O.S., Pant N.C., Laishram M.L., Tewari R.D., Joshi K., Pandey C. Effect of CuO nanoparticles on polyphenols content and antioxidant activity in Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018;7:3433-3439.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 16

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.