Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Affected in ALS

Laura Le Gall, Ekene Anakor, Owen Connolly and 3 more

Journal of Personalized Medicine · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/jpm10030101

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a terminal late-onset condition characterized by the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. Mutations in more than 30 genes are associated to the disease, but these explain only ~20% of cases. The molecular functions of these genes implicate a wide range of cellular processes in ALS pathology, a cohesive understanding of which may provide clues to common molecular mechanisms across both familial (inherited) and sporadic cases and could be key to the development of effective therapeutic approaches. Here, the different pathways that have been investigated in ALS are summarized, discussing in detail: mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, axonal transport dysregulation, glutamate excitotoxicity, endosomal and vesicular transport impairment, impaired protein homeostasis, and aberrant RNA metabolism. This review considers the mechanistic roles of ALS-associated genes in pathology, viewed through the prism of shared molecular pathways.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most frequent motor neuron disease (MND), with an estimated ~223,000 patients being affected globally in 2015. The pathology affects both upper motor neurons (UMN) in the cortex and lower motor neurons (LMN) in the brainstem and spinal cord. Paralysis and death usually occur between three to four years after symptom onset, and there are currently no effective treatments to slow disease progression. Approximately 90% of ALS cases are sporadic, while 10% are familial, defined by the occurrence of ALS in more than one family member. Around 30 different genes are linked with ALS, explaining ~20% of all ALS cases and associated with different molecular functions and disease phenotypes, so that the task of understanding the relationships between affected pathways is complex.

To investigate the different molecular pathways affected in ALS, various in vivo models, including drosophila, C-elegans, zebrafish, and rodents, as well as in vitro cell models such as patient lymphoblastoid cell lines and hybrid or primary murine cell lines, have been developed. Most of these models investigate the pathological effects of mutations to ALS genes, including Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), Superoxide dismutase (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72). Their study has resulted in numerous cellular and molecular mechanisms being proposed to explain motor neuron death. Mechanisms frequently implicated include: reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, axonal and vesicular trafficking dysregulation, glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, proteostatic impairments, and altered RNA metabolism and/or processing.

Alteration to one or more of these cellular processes may be present, not only in the motor neurons themselves but, also, in neighboring cell populations, such as glial cells, peripheral inflammatory cells, and muscles, as ALS is increasingly considered a multisystemic disease that culminates in motor neuron death. For example, astrocytes and microglia have been implicated in the release of proinflammatory mediators that lead to chronic neuroinflammation and motor neuron toxicity. In addition, the selective overexpression of mutant SOD1 in skeletal muscle was shown to cause mitochondrial abnormalities, induce microglial activation in the central nervous system (CNS), and result in severe muscle atrophy in mice.

Consensus is yet to be reached regarding the causal mechanisms involved in the onset and propagation of ALS. The aim of this review is to identify and summarize the different molecular mechanisms implicated in various forms of the disease, including sporadic and familial cases. In doing so, it is hoped that new insights may be gained regarding the role of different pathways across different forms of the disease.

2. Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress results from an imbalance between the production and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as an impaired ability to repair ROS-mediated toxicity, and has been of particular interest in ALS pathogenesis ( and Figure 1) since the discovery of SOD1 mutations in familial forms of ALS. Increased levels of oxidized proteins, RNA, DNA, and lipids have been observed in post-mortem tissue from both sporadic and SOD1 ALS cases, as well as in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, and urine of sporadic ALS patients.

SOD1 is a major antioxidant enzyme that is ubiquitously expressed and catalyzes radical superoxide anions into molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. Approximately 80 of the 160 SOD1 mutations reported in ALS are missense mutations that fail to cause a loss of SOD1 activity, and many SOD1 mouse models show a progressive, late-onset motor phenotype with concomitant astrogliosis and motor neuron pathology when mutated forms of human SOD1 are overexpressed. Evidence from human samples have shown that there is a 42% reduction in overall SOD1 activity in familial SOD1 patients, potentially leading to an imbalance between ROS production and degradation (Figure 1). This imbalance might be exacerbated by the disruption of the NRF2-ARE (Nuclear erythroid 2-Related Factor—antioxidant response element) signaling pathway that is observed in SOD1 ALS, thus affecting the expression of antioxidant proteins (Figure 1). Supporting these hypotheses, oxidative damage such as protein glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation were observed in the motor neurons of the anterior horn from SOD1 familial ALS (fALS) patients and SOD1G93A mice.

The generation of ROS could result from the activity of NADPH oxidase in the lipid raft membrane compartment. Interestingly, the ATXN2 gene encodes the ataxin-2 polyglutamine (PolyQ) protein, and intermediate-length PolyQ expansions (27–33 Qs), which are known to be a significant risk for ALS, can interact with NADPH oxidase and may lead to an increase in ROS production, DNA damage, and mitochondrial distress (Figure 1).

Recurrent oxidative stress and/or mitochondrial dysfunction occurring throughout the life of the cell can lead to DNA damage—damage that can be fixed by activating the DNA damage repair machinery. Several genes known to encode for proteins involved in DNA damage repair are also associated with ALS: NEK1, C21orf2, and SETX. These encode for the proteins never in mitosis-A (NIMA)-related kinase 1 (NEK1), cilia and flagella-associated protein 410, and the DNA/RNA helicase senataxin, respectively. Mutations in these genes may therefore increase the susceptibility to ALS as a result of dysregulated DNA damage repair machinery, leading to an impaired ability of motor neurons to cope with oxidative stress, consequently leading to cell death (Figure 1). For example, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) motor neurons derived from NEK1c.2434A>T-mutated ALS patients exhibit an increased level of DNA damage, as well as a failure to repair DNA double-strand breaks. Primary motor neurons from SETXR2136H and SETXL389S murine models were unable to cope with induced oxidative stress and showed an increased stress granule formation.

Altogether, these studies suggest that oxidative stress might be increased in sporadic and familial ALS patients. Increased oxidative stress may affect mitochondrial function, exacerbate endoplasmic reticulum stress, and impact protein homeostasis mechanisms, ultimately leading to cell damage and neuronal loss.

3. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondria are key organelles for ATP generation, calcium buffering, and apoptosis regulation, and their dysfunction in the dorsal root ganglion cells of sporadic ALS patients has been described previously. Several mechanisms can trigger mitochondrial dysfunction in ALS (Figure 1).

The maintenance of mitochondrial cristae organization is crucial to ensure respiratory chain function and requires cardiolipin, the ATP synthase dimer, and large protein complexes such as the mitochondrial contact site complex (MICOS) and dynamin-like Opa1/Mgm1. The coiled-coil helix coiled-coil helix domain-containing protein 10 (CHCHD10), known to be associated with ALS, is suspected to be either part of or interact with MICOS. Consequently, mutations in CHCHD10 result in the loss of mitochondria cristae, mitochondria fragmentation, and defective mitochondrial repair (Figure 1).

Mitochondrial biogenesis can also be directly affected, as observed in FUS-mutated conditions. While FUS encodes for a DNA/RNA-binding protein predominantly localized to the nucleus, mutated forms of FUS can accumulate in the cytosol and possibly become toxic and affect the mitochondrial function. For example, the mutated FUSP525L can interact with mitochondrial chaperone proteins and induce mitochondria fragmentation and elevated ROS production.

Aberrant swollen mitochondria morphology has also been observed in neuronal, non-neuronal cells, and muscle tissue of other fALS cases, such as SOD1 and C9orf72-mutated ALS patients but, also, in both SOD1G93A and TDP-43A315T murine models. The aberrant morphology may result from a cascade of events involving the mutated protein aggregates. For example, insoluble mutant SOD1 can aggregate in mitochondria in the spinal cord of SOD1G93A mice, causing the formation of vacuoles in the outer- and inter-mitochondrial membrane, affecting mitochondrial respiration, energy production, and ultimately, increasing the level of oxidative stress (Figure 1). ALS patients with the SOD1A4V mutation show significant increases in complex I and III activity of mitochondria in the motor cortex. The overactivation of complexes I and III increased the production of mitochondrial ROS and may explain the high level of oxidative stress observed in SOD1 mice and patients.

The G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat expansion mutation (HREM) in the C9orf72 gene explains 40–50% of familial ALS cases and 5–10% of sporadic cases. There are several hypotheses regarding the mechanisms by which this leads to toxicity, and evidence exists for both loss and gain-of-function-mediated toxicity. One hypothesis suggests that the repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation of G4C2 repeats is causal in the expression of toxic dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins. RAN translation can occur in both sense and antisense reading frames, resulting in the production of five different DPRs: glycine-alanine (GA), glycine-arginine (GR), proline-arginine (PR), proline-alanine (PA), and glycine-proline (GP). Interestingly, the expression of poly-GR results in early abnormalities in the mitochondiral respiratory chain by interacting with ATP5A1, a complex V protein, and leads to its ubiquitination and degradation in C9orf72 ALS-FTD patients. Mitochondrial dysfunction and an increased oxidative stress are reported in fibroblasts and iPSC-derived astrocytes obtained from C9orf72 ALS patients (Figure 1).

Nonfunctional and damaged mitochondria can be targeted by NIP3-like protein X (NIX) or PTEN-induced putative kinase protein 1 (PINK1)-E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin, then sequestered into isolation membranes and degraded after fusion with the autophagosome or lysosome. Optineurin (OPTN) and TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) are key actors for mitochondria engulfment. Consequently, ALS mutation in OPTN and TBK1 will affect the mitophagic flux and may lead to an accumulation of nonfunctional mitochondria over time and result in motor neuron death (see for review). Taken together, except for CHCHD10, these studies point toward mitochondria dysfunction and damage being a downstream effect of ALS gene mutations that lead to protein aggregations and/or proteostasis dysfunction (see Section 7: Impaired Protein Homeostasis).

In addition, damage to mitochondria and alterations in their functions can disrupt calcium homeostasis, increasing the sensitivity of neurons to glutamate excitotoxicity and the risk of motor neuron damage (, Figure 1). Mitochondrial dysfunction can also activate proapoptotic signals, such as the caspase-dependent or bcl-2-dependant pathways, and might lead to motor neuron degeneration.

4. Axonal Transport

Motor neurons have exceptionally long axons, up to 1 m in length, placing extreme demands on cellular physiological functions that rely on the axonal transport of organelles such as mitochondria or of molecules including proteins, lipids, and RNA to and from the synapse. Axonal transport, as well as the conduction of electrical impulses and the maintenance of the axon structure, are heavily regulated processes linked with control of the neurofilament structure. In both sporadic ALS ( sALS) and fALS patients, the disorganization of neurofilament networks has been reported.

Neurofilaments are neuron-specific intermediate filaments that are stretch-resistant and are major cytoskeleton proteins. They form parallel coiled-coiled heterotetramers composed of light, medium, and heavy-weighted neurofilaments (NF-L, NF-M, and NF-H, respectively) and α-internexin or peripherin. Eight heterotetramers form cylindrical structures known as unit-length filaments (ULFs) with the tail domains sticking out. A series of ULFs form a filament that matures into neurofilament after a radial compaction of the cylindrical structure. Consequently, variants in the NEFH gene affecting the crosslinking properties of the NF-H protein may result in abnormal neurofilament accumulations and in axonal transport defects.

Neurofilaments form cross-bridges not only with each other but, also, with actin filaments, actin rings, and microtubules, constituing a protein network that might participate to the maintenance of the axon structure. Actin polymerization requires the small actin-binding proteins profilin I and II and phosphoinositide islands localized at the membrane. Mutations in the PFN1 gene encoding profilin-I are associated with ALS, and the expression of mutant hPFN1G118V in a murine model resulted in dysregulated actin polymerization. Consequently, the attachement of actin to the microtubules might be affected, probably impacting anterograde and retrograde transport and, thus, leading to an accumulation of fragmented mitochondria and, ultimately, to upper and lower motor neuron death (, Section 3 and Figure 1).

Microtubules and motor proteins such as the dynein-dynactin complex and the kinesins are involved in the long-distance transport of cellular cargo. Microtubules are composed of dimers of α- and β-tubulin. The alpha tubulin subtype TUBA4A is an ALS-associated protein, and ALS-associated mutations of TUBA4A lead to microtubule polymerization defects and network destabilization.

The dynein-dynactin complex, along with the kinesins, are key drivers of the anterograde and retrograde movements of diverse cargoes along the microtubule cytoskeleton, including organelles, vesicles, neurofilaments, AMPA and GABA receptors, and RNAs. Interestingly, mutations in dynactin subunit 1 (DCTN1) affecting the tertiary structure of the dynactin protein and its capacity to bind to microtubules can cause ALS. When the interaction between dynein-dynactin is interrupted by the overexpression of dynamitin, axonal transport is impaired, and mice develop a late-onset motor pathology that recapitulates late-onset progressive ALS. Kinesins form a superfamily of molecular motors that can be divided into three groups. KIF5, a member of kinesin 1-group, is a tetramer with two kinesin heavy chains (KHCs) that contains a motor domain and two kinesin light chains (KLCs) that facilitate connections with cargo. There are three KIF5 isoforms—KIF5A, KIF5B, and KIF5C—all three isoforms being associated with the neuronal function and anterograde transport of proteins and organelles. Mutations in the C-terminal of KIF5A, leading to a loss of function, are associated with ALS and are suspected to disrupt the axonal transport (Figure 1). This hypothesis is supported by the defective axonal transport of mitochondria, the local accumulation of neurofilament, and the reduced axonal growth and survival observed in the primary culture of motor neurons from KIF5A−/− mice.

Distal axonal transport is also affected in SOD1G93A mice at an early stage, with an early decrease in kinesin expression in asymptomatic mice, followed by a decrease in dynein expression in older presymptomatic mice. Defective axonal transport may contribute to the accumulation of impaired mitochondria at distal sites (, Figure 1), resulting in decreased ATP production and disrupted calcium homeostasisis at the neuromuscular junction, consequently leading to a distal axonopathy in SOD1G93A mice and SOD1 patients. Kinesin-dynein machineries have been described to be affected in sporadic ALS, where KIF1Bβ and KIF3Aβ, two kinesin-related proteins, were found to be downregulated in motor cortex samples of sporadic patients. However, the expression level of another kinesin-related protein, KIFAP3, is inversely correlated with sporadic ALS patient survival.

In conclusion, different mutations associated to ALS can directly alter the architecture and dynamics of the cytoskeleton, affecting the axonal transport machinery. Interestingly, aberrant axonal transport has also been observed in sALS patients and in fALS patients harboring mutations in non-cytoskeletal-related genes. Disrupted transport mechanisms can then affect the mitochondrial metabolism and degeneration (Section 3), as well as protein degradation (Section 7) and RNA transport (Section 8), ultimately leading to motor neuron death.

5. Glutamate Excitotoxicity

Glutamate is the most abundant neurotransmitter in the CNS and is released from presynaptic neurons into the synaptic cleft, resulting in the activation of NMDA and AMPA receptors that mediate calcium and sodium influxes in postsynaptic neurons. Excess glutamate may result in the abnormal activation of glutamate receptors, causing an excessive influx of Ca2+ in the postsynaptic neuron (Figure 1), which leads to extreme neuronal firing, resulting in excitotoxicity, which is potentially implicated in a number of pathological conditions, including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s diasease, and ALS. Glutamate excitotoxicity is thought to occur as a result of defective glutamate uptake and transport mechanisms that lead to excessive neuronal Ca2+ intake, aberrant Ca2+ homeostasis, downstream mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased ROS production (Figure 1). Glutamate-gated AMPA receptors are abundant in human and animal motor neurons and are made up of four subunits, GluA1 to GluA4 (also GluR1–4). The overactivation of AMPA receptors has been shown to result in hindlimb paralysis and motor neuron degeneration in wild-type rats, highlighting the susceptibility of motor neurons to Ca2+ dysregulation. The Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors is mediated by the presence of the GluA2 subunit, the absence of which, in addition to impaired transcriptional editing at the Q/R site, confers increased AMPA Ca2+ permeability. Interestingly, spinal motor neurons have been reported to display a reduced expression of GluA2 relative to dorsal horn neurons from the same region, providing some explanation for the selective susceptibiltiy of motor neurons in ALS, and GluA2 transcriptional editing has been found to be impaired in motor neurons of sporadic ALS patients relative to controls. Furthermore, evidence suggests that GluA2 editing is also impaired in ALS oculomotor neurons, despite their spared function in disease. However, spared functionality has been hypothesized to be the result of increased Ca2+-binding proteins and, in particular, parvalbumin, which is highly abundant in oculomotor neurons and present at low levels in spinal motor neurons. GluA2 transcriptional editing into the Ca2+ impermeable subunit is mediated by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 (ADAR2) activity. A reduced ADAR2 expression has been reported in sporadic ALS patients and has been shown to result in an increased aggregation of TDP-43 in spinal motor neurons. Taken together, the evidence suggests that a decreased GluA2 expression and impaired transcriptional editing in spinal motor neuron AMPA receptors is a contributing factor to the increased uptake of Ca2+ and the downstream susceptibility to excitotoxicity in ALS (Figure 1). Moreover, the finding that AMPA receptor dysfunction can result in the aggregation of misfolded TDP-43 is an important finding for linking ALS pathology with the glutamate excitotoxicity hypothesis.

In addition to dysregulated GluA2 subunit function, research has reported dysfunctional glutamate transport mechanisms in ALS. Under normal physiological conditions, glutamate at the synaptic cleft is cleared by the excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT2), which functions to maintain low levels of extracellular glutamate and, thus, prevent excessive increases in intracellular Na+ and Ca2+ levels. EAAT2 is found primarely on the synaptic processes of astrocytes, and the loss of EAAT2 has been reported to induce increased extracellular levels of glutamate and cause motor neuron toxicity and muscle paralysis in animal models, whilst the pharmalogical stimulation of EAAT2 was found to rescue motor neuron degeneration and delay paralysis in SOD1G93A mice. Abnormalaties in EAAT2 have been suggested to occur post-translationally after a post-mortem research highlighted no differences in EAAT2 mRNA expressions between sporadic ALS patients and controls, despite a 95% decrease in protein levels in sALS subjects. Further support of EAAT2 loss and its implications in ALS were reported by a separate group who demonstrated a reduced EAAT2 immunoreactivity in anterior horn cells of sporadic ALS and lower motor neuron disease patients relative to healthy controls. Together, these studies highlight the role of dysfunctional glutamate uptake and transport mechanisms in sporadic cases of ALS (Figure 1).

Excitotoxicity has also been associated with genetic forms of the disease. SOD1 mutations have been implicated in the glutamate excitotoxicity hypothesis, and research has demonstrated an increased glutamate release, as well as motor neuron and inter-neuron hyperexcitability two to three months prior to motor neuron degeneration and phenotype onset in SOD1G93A mice. SOD1 mutations have also been shown to reduce the expression of astrocytic GluA2 in vitro and in vivo, thereby diminishing their ability to protect against motor neuron excitotoxicity. In patients, the deterioration of neuronal dendrites was observed in sporadic and familial ALS cases, but not in healthy or Alzheimer’s disease controls, leading to the suggestion that ALS is a synaptopathy, which is perhaps attributable to the excessive levels of glutamate observed in the CSF of patients. Indeed, metabolomic analyses suggest that ALS patients show elevated serum levels of glutamate, and there is evidence that sporadic and familial ALS cases show heightened levels of cortical excitablity, which can be detected even in the presymptomatic stages in familial SOD1 mutation carriers. However, other studies have failed to find evidence for elevated glutamate levels in ALS patients. C9orf72 has also been implicated in the glutamate excitotoxicity hypothesis after iPSC motorneurons from ALS patients were found to have impaired autophagosome formation and aberrant accumulations of glutamate receptors. This has been supported in vivo with C9orf72 knockout mice showing GluR1 upregulation in the hippocampus and a greater susceptibility to excitotoxicity compared to controls. In addition, C9orf72 knockout mice demonstrated a complete loss of SMCR8, a protein that functions in a complex with C9orf72 and WD40 repeat domain 41 (WDR41) to regulate membrane trafficking and autophagy. The concomitant abnormalities in autophagy and aberrant accumulations of GluR1 has led to the hypothesis that C9orf72 loss-of-function leads to an impaired clearance of excess glutamate receptors, which, in turn, results in a greater glutamate uptake and increased susceptibility to excitotoxicity (Figure 1). C9orf72 patients have also been reported to demonstrate elevated glutamate levels in their cerebropsinal fluid (CSF), which has been hypothesized to occur as a result of DPR-mediated splicing defects to EAAT2 and subsequent impairments in glutamate clearance. Research has also implicated ALS2 in the glutamate exicitotoxicity hypothesis by virtue of its interaction with Rab5 and the endosomal pathway. ALS2-/- knockout mice have been reported to show significant increases in glutamate receptor degradation, including GluA2, the loss of which is believed to contribute to excitotoxicity and motor neuron degeneration. Similarly, ALS2−/− spinal motor neurons were found to be more susceptible to glutamate excitotoxicity as a result of reduced GluA2 at the synapses of neurons, which was attributed to an altered glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) function, caused by the genetic loss of ALS2.

Although there is evidence to suggest the presence of glutamate transport and uptake defects in both sporadic and familial cases of ALS, it is unclear how these defects lead to the specific deterioration of motor neurons in disease. Furthermore, it has been 25 years since the approval of the antiglutamatergic drug riluzole for the treatment of ALS, yet there is no understanding as to why it, as well as other antiglutamatergics, including gabapentin, memantine, and ceftriaxone, fail to delay symptom progressions in ALS by more than ~three months.

6. Endosomal Pathway and Vesicle Secretion

Extracellular vesicles encompass different types such as apoptotic vesicles, microvesicles, and exosomes, all of which can affect the functionality of the recipient cells. The last decade has seen several investigations into the relevance of exosomes to ALS, either in propagating the disease or as biomarkers. In the ALS context, exosomes secreted by astrocytes, neurons, or microglia are suspected to carry neurotoxic elements such as mutated SOD1 or C9orf72-derived DPR and to be responsible for motor neuron death. Interestingly, sporadic muscle cells present an accumulation of vacuole and multivesicular bodies in their cytosol, suggesting that vesicle trafficking is disrupted in these cells ( and personal data) and that extracellular vesicle secretion might have an important role in ALS.

Exosome biogenesis requires the formation of inward buds in the multivesicular body (MVB), followed by their fission and release as vesicles into the MVB lumen. The generation of intraluminal vesicles can be either Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT)-dependent or ESCRT-independent. The ESCRT is composed of four complexes—ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III—each complex acting one after the other to form intraluminal vesicles. Interestingly, charged multivesicular protein 2B (CHMP2B) is a component of ESCRT-III involved in the processing of cargo into intraluminal vesicles and is associated with ALS. The dysfunction of ESCRT-III may lead to abnormal and dysmorphic endosomes (Figure 2).

Endocytosis and vesicle trafficking from one cellular compartment to another are regulated by small Rab GTPases. For example, Rab5 is associated with the formation of early and late endosomes, while Rabs 11, 35, and 27 have direct roles in exosome biogenesis and secretion. Alsin is an ALS-associated protein and is a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor involved in endosome motility and fusion with the lysosome. Consequently, an absence of alsin expression in hippocampal neurons leads to an accumulation of Rab5-positive vesicles and an enhanced lysosome-mediated degradation, suggesting an enhanced degradation of endosomal vesicles, thus probably affecting the production and secretion of exosomal vesicles.

The C9orf72 protein structure presents some similarities with the Differentially Expressed Normal versus Neoplastic (DENN) guanine nucleotide exchange factor and, thus, may activate Rab proteins such as RAB8A and RAB39B; Rab1a; or Rabs 1, 7, and 11, which are associated with autophagy and vesicle-trafficking processes, as well as exosome biogenesis and secretion. In C9orf72 knockdown cell lines, a C9orf72 knockout murine model, and in ALS patient fibroblasts and iPSC-derived motor neurons, transgolgi and endosomal trafficking were reduced, a defective autophagy pathway was observed, and exosomal secretion was affected.

Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B (VAPB) is involved in vesicle trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum and the golgi apparatus. Interestingly, VAPB has been described to interact with RAB7 and colocalize with CD63, two proteins involved in late-endosome formation and exosome biogenesis. However, the impact of ALS-associated VAPB mutation in exosome biogenesis and secretion still needs to be investigated.

Multivesicular body formation is at a crossroad between the autophagy (Figure 2) and secretion pathways, and an autophagic failure may lead to cell secretion. The VCP gene is associated with ALS and encodes for a valosin-containing protein, an ubiquitous AAA+ ATPase that interacts with clathrin to form early endosomes but, also, with the autophagy pathways. In this context, a mutation in a valosin-containing protein (VCP) may affect the endosomal pathway, and one can hypothesize that it has an impact on the formation and secretion of exosomes. Other gene mutations associated to ALS, such as protein polyphosphoinositide 5-phosphatase (FIG4) or spastacsin (Spg11), are associated with the blockade of lysosomal clearance (see Section 7)—the blockade of which could potentially lead to vesicle secretion. However, futher investigations related to exosome pathways in ALS in vivo are needed.

7. Impaired Protein Homeostasis

Protein aggregates positive for TDP-43, neurofilament, FUS, or SOD1 are observed in the vast majority of ALS patients, with TDP-43 being present in as many as 98% of sporadic and familial cases, meaning that the presence of such aggregates is widely regarded as a hallmark feature of ALS pathology. These deposits can occur in the cytoplasm of neurons and skeletal muscle, and their presence is highly suggestive of an imbalance between protein synthesis and degradation pathways (Figure 2).

7.1. Proteasome and Autophagic Degradation Pathways

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the presence of protein inclusions in the anterior horn cells of sporadic and familial ALS patients was described. Later, these inclusions were found to be ubiquitin positive, and SOD1 was the first ALS-associated protein found to be immunoreactive within the inclusions of familial patients. Subsequently, ubiquinated inclusions have often been found to be immunoreactive for the ubiquitin-binding protein p62, and up to 98% of sALS and fALS cases show inclusions that are TDP-43-positive, with the exception being SOD1 and FUS patients who do not demonstrate TDP-43 inclusions but do demonstrate SOD1 and FUS immunoreactive inclusions. Other ALS proteins that have been implicated in the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions include optineurin (OPTN), ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2), dynactin 1 (DNCT1), valosin-containing protein (VCP), and matrin 3 (MATR3). Studying the structure of the main proteins SOD1, FUS, and TDP-43 helped to unravel potential mechanisms involved in protein misfolding and self-propagation within the cells and in surrounding cells. SOD1 is a stable homodimer, thanks to the intrasubunit disulfide bond and its ability to bind zinc and copper. However, a reducing and metal-poor intracellular environment or mutations can abolish these features and destabilize SOD1, leading to the formation of aggregates and amyloid fibril structures that can self-propagate in vitro. FUS and TDP-43 proteins possess a low complexity domain that presents similarities with yeast prions and can form large aggregates and amyloid fibril structures. Interestingly, mutated forms of FUS and TDP-43 can induce the misfolding of wild type forms of FUS and TDP-43, respectively, and have also been shown to induce the misfolding of wild type forms of SOD1 in vitro. Altogether, these studies suggest a potential mechanism for the self-propagation of misfolded proteins in vitro—misfolded proteins that can potentially be transferred from cell to cell via secreted vesicles, thus propagating the misfolding mechanism to neighboring cells (see Section 6,). The presence of these protein aggregates has been suggested to impair the proteasome and autophagic degradation pathways and could be key mediators in ALS pathogenesis (Figure 2).

Dysregulation of the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) in ALS patients was first suspected following the identification of mutations in genes encoding ubiquilin 2 and VCP, two proteins involved in protein clearance via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mutations in OPTN and SQSTM1/P62 were then identified, and following this, SOD1, VABP, C9orf72, and CCNF (cyclin F) mutations were all reported to reduce UPS activation. Ubiquitin-positive inclusions were observed in post-mortem neuronal and muscular tissues of fALS and sALS patients and, more specifically, in C9orf72 patients. Similarly, SOD1, FUS, ubiquilin 2, and C9orf72-derived DPR proteins can generate toxic aggregates positive for some proteasome components. These ubiquitin-positive inclusions can also contain and ”trap” nonmutated forms of SOD1, TDP-43, optineurin, and ubiquilin 2, thus exacerbating the already disrupted cellular homeostasis in ALS.

The degradation of ubiquitinated proteins through the autophagy/lysosomal pathway occurs in four steps: (1) the initiation and extension of the bilayer vacuole into phagophores; (2) the transport of selective cargoes (including ubiquitinated proteins, dysfunctional mitochondria, and protein aggregates); (3) the maturation into autophagosomes; and (4) fusion with low pH lysosomes to form autolysosomes where degradation of the cargoes can proceed.

The fusion of the endosome with the lysosome for degradation is an tightly regulated event involving the protein polyphosphoinositide 5-phosphatase, FIG4. Deleterious mutations in FIG4 in ALS leads to abnormal lysosomal storage. Spastacsin is also involved in lysosomal clearance, and the absence of Spg11 expression impaired the lysosomal-autophagy pathway and is accompanied by an accumulation of lipid within the lysosomes. Nonfunctional TBK1 and p62 inhibit the transport of targeted cargoes toward the autophagosome. Interestingly, impaired autophagosome maturation was also observed in ALS cells mutated for FUS, VCP, CHMP2B, and OPTN. The importance of autophagy can be observed in studies that stimulate autophagic activation in the presence of ALS mutations. For instance, the stimulation of autophagy in murine and human iPSC-derived neurons expressing TARDBP mutations demonstrated a greater clearance of TDP-43 aggregates relative to nonstimulated cells and resulted in improved motor neuron survival.

C9orf72 mutations can interfere with the autophagy pathway at several levels. When C9orf72 expression is abolished or decreased as suggested by the haploinsufficiency hypothesis, autophagy is inhibited, leading to simultaneous increases in the number of cytoplasmic inclusions immunoreactive for ubiquitin, p62, and TDP-43. The impairment of autophagy in C9orf72 cells may also result in the accumulation of cytotoxic DPR proteins encoded by the G4C2 HREM and, ultimately, lead to neuronal loss. Similarly to cells expressing TARDBP mutations, the stimulation of autophagy abolished the accumulation of poly-DPR proteins and neuronal toxicity.

Altogether, these studies illustrate the importance of autophagy for the efficient clearance of misfolded and aggregated proteins and is indicative of the underlying impairments in proteostatic mechanisms that mediate ALS physiopathology (Figure 2).

7.2. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

During the formation of misfolded proteins, the unfolded-protein response (UPR) may be initiated to transport defective proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where ER-resident chaperones will properly fold the protein. The accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER activates the ER stress response pathway, also known as the endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway. The ERAD pathway involves the translocation of misfolded proteins from the ER lumen to the cytosol, where they undergo ubiquitination and degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In ALS patient cells, mutated SOD1 agregates were observed in ER and colocalized with UPR markers, leading to an increase in ER stress by interacting with ER stress response proteins and inhibiting their function in the ERAD response. The presence of poly (GA) aggregates, observed in neuronal post-mortem C9orf72 ALS patients, can inhibit proteasome activity and induce ER stress, which can be abolished when using ER stress inhibitors such as salubrinal and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA). Concordantly, the cerebropsinal fluid (CSF) of sporadic ALS patients displays an accumulation of ER stress markers, and when healthy neurons were exposed to patient CSF, the ER became fragmentated and caspase-dependent apoptosis was activated, suggesting an increase in ER stress.

Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B (VAPB) is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and has a key role in vesicle trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum, golgi apparatus, and the nuclear envelope. The VAPBP56S mutation associated with ALS leads to a misfolded protein that accumulates in the ER and can cause a defect in nuclear envelope protein transport, leading to an aberrant nuclear envelope structure. Interestingly, the accumulation of VAPB has also been observed in the endoplasmic reticulum of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of sporadic ALS.

Optineurin is a TBK1 partner and is involved in mitophagy (Section 3). When the association of optineurin with myosin VI is disrupted, as osberved in fALS cases associated with OPTN mutations, optineurin is diffused in the cytosol of neuronal cells and results in ER stress and Golgi apparatus fragmentation, as well as an inhibition of the autophagy pathway (, Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Altogether, these studies suggest that protein degradation could be directly and indirectly affected in ALS, causing protein aggregation that leads, in turn, to the disruption of the function of organelles such as nuclei (Section 7.2) and mitochondria (Section 3) or to the blockage of lysosomal activity that can potentially affect cell-cell communication (Section 6).

8. Aberrant RNA Metabolism

FUS and TDP-43 are RNA-binding proteins involved in multiples steps of RNA metabolism. In ALS patients, mutations in both genes give rise to the translation of proteins frequently mislocalized to the cytoplasm and, subsequently, result in downstream complications that affect RNA-processing mechanisms. Dysregulated RNA metabolism is another key feature of ALS pathogenesis and includes transcription defects, alternate splicing changes, miRNA biogenesis, stress granule formation, and RNA nucleocytoplasmic transport (Figure 3).

8.1. RNA Splicing and Translation

Given the large number of possible protein-protein interactions between FUS or TDP-43 and their partners, it is easy to expect alterations to important RNA-processing mechanisms in ALS patients. FUS and TDP-43 also regulate the expression of multiple proteins involved in neuronal physiology, including components of the synaptic plasticity pathways and dendritic branching processes. In addition, the HREM in C9orf72 generates repeat RNA and RNA foci, which repress the gene expression of RNA metabolism regulators (such as hnRNPA3) or sequester TDP-43 and FUS proteins and, thus, indirectly inhibits the transcription of RNA metabolism-associated genes. Similarly to C9orf72-mediated RNA-processing defects, FUS mutations have been associated with major transcriptional defects.

Ataxin-2 is a polyglutamine (polyQ) protein that is involved in mRNA translation, and it interacts with RNA-binding proteins such as TDP-43 and FUS. In ALS spinal cords, ataxin 2 exhibited significant cytoplasmic accumulation and enhanced the toxicity of TDP-43 in Drosophila via RNA binding.

TDP-43, FUS, hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2B1, and MATR3 are associated with ALS and involved in pre-mRNA processing. Consequently, TDP-43 knockdown in murine tissues results in the alternate splicing dysregulation of numerous mRNA transcripts, and the loss-of-function of FUS also induces many splicing defects, suggesting important alternate splicing events in ALS patients (Figure 3). These downstream complications are not surprising given the ability of the protein FUS to sequester numerous components of the splicing process, such as key splicing factors U1 snRNP and U11/U12 snRNPs, which are involved in minor intronic splicing. Alternative splicing changes have been identified in neuronal genes involved in cytoskeleton organization, axonal growth, and guidance in FUS-mutated ALS patients, and, interestingly, axonopathy and axon retraction occur in the early stages of ALS.

ALS-linked MATR3S85C and MATR3P154S mutations were observed to affect Matrin 3 interactions with the TRanscription and EXport (TREX) protein complex, altering the global nuclear export of mRNA. As a result, mRNA is sequestered within the nucleus, causing export defects of TDP-43 and FUS mRNA, which may affect mRNA splicing directly and indirectly (Figure 3). Consequently, as observed in the MATR3S85C murine model, dysfunctional MATR3 may lead to astrocyte and microglia activation and result in spinal motor neuron degeneration.

The ELP3 gene encodes for elongator protein 3, a histone acetyltransferase subunit of the RNA polymerase II elongator complex responsible for RNA translation (Figure 3). Mutations in the ELP3 gene are associated with ALS and result in the shortening and abnormal branching of motor neurons, as observed in ELP3 knockdown in zebrafish embryos, and altered tRNA modification, triggering proteome impairment and the subsequent aggregation of susceptible proteins.

Angiogenin, encoded by the hypoxia-inducible gene ANG, is a member of the pancreatic ribonuclease superfamily and, as well as angiogenesis, is also involved in ribosomal biogenesis. Defects in this protein are associated with the impairment of its nuclear localization and diminished ribonucleolytic activity (Figure 3), both of which are essential for normal ANG functioning and motor neuron viability.

Together, these findings suggest that RNA processing is a key pathway affected in ALS, either due to mutations directly affecting proteins involved in RNA processing or as a consequence of protein aggregations.

8.2. RNA Foci

Sense and antisense RNA generated from the bidirectional transcription of G4C2 repeats have been proposed to induce a toxic gain-of-function in ALS C9orf72 patient cells by forming RNA foci that may sequester RNA-binding proteins, thus disrupting RNA metabolism and processing in cells (Figure 3) widely throughout the central nervous system. Both sense and antisense RNA foci are frequently observed in nucleoli, with antisense RNA foci being denser. In addition, the antisense RNA foci correlate with TDP-43 aggregation in the cytosol of C9orf72 motor neurons. An in situ hybridization of post-mortem C9orf72 ALS tissue revealed that 78.7% of the neurons and 24.9% of the glial cells in the motor brain and spinal cord regions were positive for antisense RNA foci. Interestingly, extra-motor brain regions also show a high percentage of cells positive for antisense RNA foci, with 89.4% of neurons and 46.1% of glia being positive.

8.3. Epigenetic Modulation

Epigenetic mechanisms such as microRNA regulation maintain cell type and tissue identity and may be involved in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS. The decreased expression of miRNAs, including miRNAs let-7e, miR-148b-5p, miR-577, miR-133b, and miR-140-3p, were observed in post-mortem spinal cords of sporadic ALS patients, suggestive of impairment in the genes and pathways associated with miRNA biogenesis, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis.

Interestingly, the class II ribonuclease, Drosha, interacts with TDP-43, FUS, and C9orf72-mediated DPRs, while the Dicer enzyme interacts with TDP-43 protein and FUS can interact with pri-miRNA (Figure 3). Consequently, mutated TDP-43 may impair the post-transcriptional regulation of miRNAs and lead to an altered expression of miR-132-3p and miR-132-5p (involved in the regulation of neuronal outgrowth), miR-143-3p and miR-143-5p (involved in myoblast cell differentiation), miR-558-3p (involved in neurofilament stability), and miR-574-3p (associated with stroke). Similarly, the downregulation of FUS in a neuroblastoma cell line had a considerable impact on the biogenesis of miRNAs, with an altered expression of miR-9, miR-125b, and miR-132 implicated in neuronal differentiation, activity, and function, while mutated FUS affected the expression levels of miR125 and miR192, which are involved in early neural conversion or senescence.

Altogether, these findings are consistent with defective miRNA processing in ALS patients, which may affect downstream pathways with an impact on motor neuron survival.

8.4. Stress Granules and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport

In response to stressful conditions, RNA granules, also known as stress granules, are generated and can recruit FUS and TDP-43. Mutations in FUS and TDP-43 can increase the persistence of stress granules in the cytoplasm, resulting in a possible toxic gain-of-function by inhibiting mRNA translation and, thus, contributing to the progression of ALS pathology (Figure 3). The heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2B1 are RNA-binding proteins and binding partners of TDP-43 and are involved in RNA processing, including miRNA maturation, the nucleocytoplasmic transport of mRNA, and RNA metabolism. Mutations in the prion-like domains of hnRNPA2/B1 and hnRNPA1 increase fibril formation and aggregation potential, as well their hyperassembly into stress granules. Stress granules are then targeted to the lysosome by the autophagic machinery involving VCP. Indeed, the pharmacological inhibition or RNAi knockdown of VCP is accompanied by reduced stress granule clearance, while Hela cells expressing VCPA232E and VCPR155H mutations showed a constitutive appearance and accumulation of stress granules containing TDP-43. Concordantly, the ALS-VCP mutation is accompanied by an increase in stress granules.

In C9orf72 patients, stress granules are also involved in the sequestration of proteins required for effective nucleoplasmic transport, such as RAN GAP, or importing and exporting proteins. The impairment of the nucleoplasmic transport of molecules in C9orf72 ALS cells is controverisal. Indeed, while some studies observed that newly formed DPRs such as poly-PR can bind to nuclear pore transporters, thereby impairing the subsequent translocation of molecules, other studies did not observe any disruption in the nucleocytoplasmic transport with poly-GR or poly-PR. However, with the expression of poly-GA, defects were observed both in import and in export in a SH-SY5Y cell line and in iPSC-derived motor neurons, respectively.

9. Concluding Remarks

Over 150 years have passed since ALS was first reported by Charcot, and still, the etiology of the disease remains elusive. Although research is progressing and genetic studies continue to identify novel gene mutations in familial cases of ALS, many questions remain surrounding the pathological mechanisms associated with already established mutations, their roles in the disease phenotype, and the as-yet-undiscovered mechanisms that underly sporadic onset. The most investigated mechanisms revolve around neurocentric deficits in dysfunctional mitochondria and oxidative stress, axonal transport, glutamate excitotoxity, protein homeostasis, and RNA processing (Figure 4).

By detailing, as has been done in this review, the molecular events of the various pathways that are implicated in ALS, it becomes clear that these pathways can be linked to each other—in some cases, with one leading to another. For example, disrupted axonal transport can lead to an accumulation of nonfuctional mitochondria, while ATP deficiency and increased oxidative stress may damage proteins and DNA, which, in turn, could exacerbate the disruption of cellular homeostasis, leading to motor neuron death (Figure 4). These pathways are disrupted not only in motor neurons but, also, in astrocytes, microglia, peripheral blood cells, and muscle, suggesting multisystemic involvement in motor neuron death. Thus, by considering ALS from the perspective of shared molecular pathways, a cohesive understanding may yet emerge of the cellular mechanisms driving this pathology. It may be that different molecular pathways correspond to sub-strata of patients, such as among those with known genetic forms of ALS, as suggested in. However, the identification of these strata may prove to be extremely challenging in non-monogenic forms of the disease.

References 331

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.
  47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.
  80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.
  93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.
  110. 110.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.
  141. 141.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  145. 145.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  157. 157.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  159. 159.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  160. 160.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  162. 162.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  164. 164.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  165. 165.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.
  169. 169.
  170. 170.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  172. 172.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  173. 173.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  176. 176.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  177. 177.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  179. 179.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  180. 180.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.
  182. 182.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  183. 183.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  184. 184.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  186. 186.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  187. 187.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  190. 190.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  191. 191.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  192. 192.
  193. 193.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  194. 194.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  195. 195.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  196. 196.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  197. 197.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  198. 198.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  199. 199.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  200. 200.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  201. 201.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  202. 202.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  203. 203.
  204. 204.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  205. 205.
  206. 206.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  207. 207.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  208. 208.
  209. 209.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  210. 210.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  211. 211.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  212. 212.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  213. 213.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  214. 214.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  215. 215.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  216. 216.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  217. 217.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  218. 218.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  219. 219.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  220. 220.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  221. 221.
  222. 222.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  223. 223.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  224. 224.
  225. 225.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  226. 226.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  227. 227.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  228. 228.
  229. 229.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  230. 230.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  231. 231.
  232. 232.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  233. 233.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  234. 234.
  235. 235.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  236. 236.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  238. 238.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  239. 239.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  240. 240.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  241. 241.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  242. 242.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  243. 243.
  244. 244.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  245. 245.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  246. 246.
  247. 247.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  248. 248.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  249. 249.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  250. 250.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  251. 251.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  252. 252.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  253. 253.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  254. 254.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  255. 255.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  256. 256.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  257. 257.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  258. 258.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  259. 259.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  260. 260.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  261. 261.
  262. 262.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  263. 263.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  264. 264.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  265. 265.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  266. 266.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  267. 267.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  268. 268.
  269. 269.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  270. 270.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  271. 271.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  272. 272.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  273. 273.
  274. 274.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  275. 275.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  276. 276.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  277. 277.
  278. 278.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  279. 279.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  280. 280.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  281. 281.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  282. 282.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  283. 283.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  284. 284.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  285. 285.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  286. 286.
  287. 287.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  288. 288.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  289. 289.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  290. 290.
  291. 291.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  292. 292.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  293. 293.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  294. 294.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  295. 295.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  296. 296.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  297. 297.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  298. 298.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  299. 299.
  300. 300.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  301. 301.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  302. 302.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  303. 303.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  304. 304.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  305. 305.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  306. 306.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  307. 307.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  308. 308.
    Lysosomal size matters · 2019
    No notice
  309. 309.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  310. 310.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  311. 311.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  312. 312.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  313. 313.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  314. 314.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  315. 315.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  316. 316.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  317. 317.
  318. 318.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  319. 319.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  320. 320.
  321. 321.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  322. 322.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  323. 323.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  324. 324.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  325. 325.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  326. 326.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  327. 327.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  328. 328.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  329. 329.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  330. 330.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  331. 331.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.