Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Measuring Scientific Reasoning for Graduate Admissions in Psychology and Related Disciplines

Robert J. Sternberg, Karin Sternberg

Journal of Intelligence · 2017

doi:10.3390/jintelligence5030029 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In two studies, we examined the convergent and discriminant validation of a new assessment of scientific reasoning that could be used for graduate admissions in psychology, educational psychology, human development, and in the psychological sciences more generally. The full assessment ultimately consisted of tests of generating hypotheses, generating experiments, drawing conclusions, serving as a reviewer of a scientific article, and serving as an editor of a scientific journal. The tests had generally good convergent-discriminant validity. Certain socially defined ethnic/racial group differences were observed.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.