Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Liposomes for Tumor Targeted Therapy: A Review

Shile Wang, Yanyu Chen, Jiancheng Guo and 1 more

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2023 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijms24032643

Abstract

Liposomes, the most widely studied nano-drug carriers in drug delivery, are sphere-shaped vesicles consisting of one or more phospholipid bilayers. Compared with traditional drug delivery systems, liposomes exhibit prominent properties that include targeted delivery, high biocompatibility, biodegradability, easy functionalization, low toxicity, improvements in the sustained release of the drug it carries and improved therapeutic indices. In the wake of the rapid development of nanotechnology, the studies of liposome composition have become increasingly extensive. The molecular diversity of liposome composition, which includes long-circulating PEGylated liposomes, ligand-functionalized liposomes, stimuli-responsive liposomes, and advanced cell membrane-coated biomimetic nanocarriers, endows their drug delivery with unique physiological functions. This review describes the composition, types and preparation methods of liposomes, and discusses their targeting strategies in cancer therapy.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Cancer is the second-most prominent cause of death in the world. According to the latest global cancer statistics from the GLOBLOCAN project in 2020, there are approximately 19.3 million new cases and 10 million cancer deaths worldwide. In recent years, global cancer incidence and mortality rates have risen rapidly and begun to trend increasingly younger due to population growth and aging. At present, the main methods of cancer treatment include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, these methods have shortcomings and challenges that include the difficult invasiveness of solid tumors, poor drug solubility, short circulation of chemotherapeutics drugs, multidrug resistance, nonspecific targeting, and systemic and local off-target side effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies that can precisely localize the cancer site without damaging organs and tissues outside of a lesion.

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, the research of nanomaterials and nanomedical applications has recently become a scientific hot spot. Among nanomaterials, liposomes were the earliest nanodrug carriers to be discovered and are the most explored and widely functional to be used in targeted drug delivery systems. Liposomes were first discovered in the 1960s by Bengham et al., and later became the most widely used nanomedicine carriers in targeted drug delivery systems. Liposomes are spherical vesicles composed of phospholipid bilayers with hydrophilic and hydrophobic characteristics. Due to their amphiphilic feature, lipophilic drugs can be entrapped in phospholipid bilayers or adsorb on the liposome surface, whereas hydrophilic drugs can be encapsulated by the aqueous interior of vesicles. Additionally, liposomes have good biocompatibility and biodegradability due to their phospholipid bilayer structure. Liposomes have advanced significantly in recent years as carriers of small molecule drugs, peptides, proteins, nucleic acids, etc. As drug vehicles, liposomes show prominent properties such as targeted delivery, high biocompatibility, biodegradability, easy functionalization, low toxicity and immunogenicity, all of which greatly increase the sustained release and therapeutic index of drugs. However, liposomes are always cleared from the blood quickly. Therefore, to improve their stability in vivo, a series of studies have been carried out on the special modification of liposomes’ surfaces. For instance, grafting the hydrophilic polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the surface of liposomes can prevent the adsorption there of opsonins, thereby reducing mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) uptake and achieving long-time circulation.

Currently, common functionalized liposomes include long-circulating PEGylated liposomes, ligand functionalized liposomes, stimuli responsive liposomes for highly effective targeted therapy, and advanced cell membrane-coated biomimetic nanocarriers (Figure 1). Meanwhile, the safety of nanoliposomes is also affected by several characteristics, including their size, composition, surface charge, stability, integration into tissues, and interactions with cells.

Antitumor drugs generally have serious side effects, thus their clinical use has been somewhat restricted. Due to their exceptional properties, liposomes can be used as a splendid drug carrier in the field of tumor therapy and have been widely used and studied in tumors. In recent years, with the rapid development of liposome technology, many liposome-based pharmaceutical preparations have been successfully transformed into clinical applications, and many liposome products are undergoing clinical trials. The first liposome drug, Doxil®, was launched in the US in 1995 to treat patients with ovarian cancer and AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. DaunoXome® was then developed by NeXstar Pharmaceuticals to deliver daunomycin. Later, more and more liposome products have been developed and applied in clinical practice, such as Mepact®, Marqibo®, Depocyt® and Vyxeos®.

In addition to these mature clinical products and products undergoing clinical trials, some liposome preparations are being designed and developed. Girgis et al. first used epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted photoactivated multi-inhibitor liposomes (TPMILs) to remediate desmoplasia in a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model containing patient-derived pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts. TPMIL included irinotecan (IRI) and lipidated phenylporphyrin derivative photosensitizer. A series of experiments have demonstrated that a single EGFR–TPMIL construct is capable of remediating desmoplasia, controlling tumor development, and doubling survival. Zhao et al. coupled anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded liposomes to cell corpses, thereby developing “walking dead” triple-negative breast cancer cells. The delivery system significantly enhanced anti-tumor and anti-metastasis effects in vivo when employed for chemoimmunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. The present review will briefly describe the composition and types of liposomes, the methods of preparation and the clinical applications.

2. Composition and Classification of Liposomes

Liposomes are mainly composed of phospholipids (glycerophospholipids and sphingomyelins). Phospholipids are amphiphilic molecules with hydrophobic tail groups and hydrophilic head groups. These amphiphilic lipids spontaneously organize into liposomes in an aqueous environment, driven by hydrophobic interactions and other intermolecular interactions. These phospholipids can be synthesized entirely or partially from natural sources. The chemical properties of the phospholipids affect the biodistribution, clearance, drug release, permeability, and surface charge of liposomal formulations. Meanwhile, the entrapment efficiency, toxicity and stability of liposomes are also affected by the type of phospholipids utilized in their preparation. Natural-based liposomes, fabricated from unsaturated phosphatidylcholine species, provide bilayer structures with high permeability and low stability. However, liposomes made from saturated phospholipids, such as dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, result in stiff and almost impenetrable bilayer structures.

In addition to phospholipids, sterols have been added to liposomes to modulate membrane fluidity and improve liposome stability. Cholesterol is the most commonly used sterol in the formulation of liposomes. It promotes phospholipid packaging and bilayer formation, decreases membrane fluidity, reduces transmembrane transport of water-soluble drugs, and improves bilayer stability in biological fluids such as blood and plasma. Meanwhile, cholesterol can also lessen the interaction of liposomes with proteins in vivo, reduce the phospholipid depletion of high-density lipoproteins, and inhibit macrophage digestion, thereby improving the stability of liposomes. Furthermore, oligosaccharides, chitosan, and whey protein can be employed as liposome membranes to increase stability and regulate drug release.

Liposomes are vesicles that range in size from 20 nm to 2.5 μm. They may consist of one or several concentric or non-concentric membranes. The size of the vesicle and number of bilayers are acute factors that affect drug encapsulation effectiveness, clearance, and half-life in circulation. Depending on the size and number of bilayers, liposomes can be classified into unilamellar vesicles, multilamellar vesicles (MLV, >500 nm), and multivesicular vesicles (MVV, >1000 nm). Unilamellar vesicles can be divided into small unilamellar vesicles (SUV, 20–100 nm), large unilamellar vesicles (LUV, 100–1000 nm), and giant unilamellar vesicles (GUV, >1000 nm). To work efficiently, liposomes need to be prepared at a certain size to allow absorption into cells. SUV are the most commonly employed drug delivery vehicles because they have consistent drug encapsulation and release kinetics and extended circulation times.

3.1. Traditional Preparation Methods

There are a wide variety of traditional methods used to prepare liposomes, including thin-film hydration, reverse-phase evaporation, ethanol injection, sonication, extrusion, high-pressure homogenization, freeze-thaw, of which ultrasonic, extrusion, high-pressure homogenization and freeze-thaw can be prepared in combination with other methods (Table 1).

3.2. Microfluidic-Assisted Formation of Liposomes

The aforementioned traditional liposome production techniques often call for a number of postprocessing steps (such as extrusion, freeze-thaw, sonication, and/or high-pressure homogenization) to lessen the final liposome size and polydispersity. Conventional preparation methods have many limitations, including cumbersome steps, inconsistent nanoparticle structure, poor reproducibility between batches, low drug encapsulation efficiency, and polydispersed size distribution. These issues have recently been resolved by other brand-new techniques for producing liposomes. Microfluidics is a versatile technology for processing or manipulating microfluids in channel structures with dimensions of tens to hundreds of micrometers. Fluids controlled by microfluidic technology have unique properties, such as laminar flow and droplets. Using these unique fluidic phenomena, we can finely control the mixing conditions of each solvent, precisely control the assembly of nanostructures and command batch quality to achieve uniformity in the size distribution of the synthesized particles. By adjusting the flow parameters in hydrodynamic focusing systems, such as total flow rate, flow rate ratio of mixed solutions of the solutions mixed, lipid solution concentration, and feature length in microfluidic channels, it is simple to generate nanoscale liposomes with smaller and narrower size distributions.

3.2.1. Microfluidic Hydrodynamic Focusing (MHF)

The earliest examples of microfluidic technologies include hydration, pulsed jets, droplet emulsion transfer, and hydrodynamic focusing; however, these techniques frequently produce relatively large vesicular systems or microtubules, which are ineffective for nanodrug delivery. Jahn et al. first reported the fine control of liposomes by MHF. The two side channels containing aqueous solutions were vertically connected to the central channel with the lipids dissolved in alcohol. As the alcohol was mixed and diluted to a critical concentration by the aqueous solutions, the lipids spontaneously self-assembled into liposomes (Figure 2A). The size of the generated liposomes could be easily controlled to the range of 100–300 nm by adjusting the flow rate in the microfluidic channel. For further investigation, Jahn et al. modified their microfluidic system, which considerably increased its capacity to regulate liposome size and elucidated the mechanism by which to control liposome size and uniformity. They discovered that, as opposed to shear forces at the solvent–buffer interface, the generation of liposomes was dependent on the width of the focused alcohol stream and its diffusion mixing with the aqueous phase flow. The 2D hydrodynamic flow-focusing stream can be produced using a classic chip-type device. This restricts control over liposome particle size distribution.

Some compounds may diffuse into their surroundings prior to the production of vesicles as the development of vesicles depends on the process of diffusion from the organic layer to the aqueous layer. In addition, liposomes formed by this method may retain alcohols and cause stability problems. To further improve productivity, Hood et al. designed a three-dimensional microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing (3D-MHF) device, which was a concentric capillary array composed of seven identical borosilicate glass capillaries (Figure 2B). The liposome polydispersity produced by the 3D-MHF device was quadrupled, and the productivity was four orders of magnitude higher than the previous MHF method, due to the complete radial symmetry diffusion of alcohol solvated lipids into the aqueous stream. Based on MHF, Koh et al. fabricated a five-inlet polymeric microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing system to prepare oligonucleotides-containing liposomes with smaller size, narrower size distribution and more uniform structure.

3.2.2. Microfluidic Vertical Flow Focusing

The benefits of using microfluidic technology to prepare liposomes have been demonstrated by the creation of liposomes made of diverse lipids, however, commercialization of this technology has always been difficult due to its small production scale and limited throughput. On the basis of MHF, Hood et al. designed a microfluidic vertical flow focusing device with a high aspect ratio (depth: width = 100:1) (Figure 2C). In this instance, the vertical flow focusing method was used to produce populations of small, unilamellar, and almost monodispersed liposomal nanoparticles at remarkably high production rates. The microfluidic vertical flow-focusing device successfully realized the concept of multi-layer vertical flow focusing by thermoplastic micromachining process to form high aspect ratio channels. By adjusting the fluid flow ratio (alcohol–water volume flow velocity ratio) in the microfluidic network, liposomes with a modal diameter of 80–200 nm could be produced at rates as high as 1.6 mg/min−1.

3.2.3. Micromixer

After years of research, it has been found that liposomes produced by devices based on hydrodynamic flow focusing show great limitations in size and throughput. The microfluidic SHM designed by Stroock et al. is a powerful and general approach to generate liposomes with smaller sizes, and the method can solve the above problems well. Zhigaltsev et al. pioneered SHM as a scalable manufacturing method for the production of lipids of limited size (Figure 2D). The mixer uses chaotic advection. The chaotic advection causes the water flow to stretch and fold over the channel cross-section, effectively increasing mass transfer while increasing the herringbone structure at the bottom of the channel. Maeki et al. found that the size and polydispersity index of liposomes prepared by SHM decreased simultaneously with the increase of flow rate ratio. However, there are practical limitations in terms of cost and production speed of such micromixers. To solve these problems, a toroidal mixer can be used as an alternative design. Generating more vortices and centrifugal forces between the inner columns of the cartridge induces chaotic advection, which improves mixing and higher throughput.

4. Functionalized Liposomes

To enhance the clinical applications of liposomes, researchers have functionalized liposomes in specific ways. The common types include long-circulating liposomes, actively targeted liposomes, stimuli-responsive liposomes, and cell membrane-coated liposomes.

4.1. Long-Circulating Liposomes

The neovasculature formed by rapid tumor growth contains wide fenestrations and restricted lymphatic drainage, allowing nanodrug carriers to flow through the comparatively leaky blood arteries of the tumor and consolidate at the target site. This phenomenon is known as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Indeed, tumor absorption of liposomes is essentially dependent on the EPR effect. However, when administered intravenously, liposomes are quickly removed by MPS in the liver and spleen. After entering the circulation, MPS uptakes liposomes by recognizing plasma proteins and complement components bound to a liposome’s surface.

Based on this principle, it was found that liposome surface conjugation with hydrophilic polymers or a glycolipid could decrease MPS uptake of liposomes, thus allowing their long-term circulation in the blood. These hydrophilic polymers or glycolipids can occupy the space on the liposome surface, thereby excluding other macromolecules from this space. Consequently, the binding of liposomes to plasma proteins is hindered, thus prolonging their circulation life. Huayluorinic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, and PEG are thought to be the best models for liposome steric protection. Among these, PEGylation is a widely used method to achieve long circulation inside liposomes. PEG is a hydrophilic polymer that reduces the adhesion of nanoparticles to mucin fibers in the mucus mesh and increases mucus penetration, allowing particles to quickly penetrate mucus. Thus, PEGylated liposomes enable sustained and targeted mucosal drug delivery. In order to improve the efficiency of mucosal administration, and in addition to promoting the mucus permeability of the particles, these liposomes can also improve the mucosal adhesion and prolong the residence time of the preparation in the mucosa. In recent years, it has been found that polymers functionalized with maleimide can form covalent linkages with thiol groups present in mucins to exhibit excellent mucosal adhesion properties. Kaldybekov et al. showed good performance in bladder mucosal administration with maleimide-functionalized PEGylated liposomes.

In addition, PEG functionalization on the liposome surface can alter the pharmacokinetics of liposomes, resulting in slower release rates. Although PEG-functionalized liposomes show many advantages, deepening of research has shown that there are many problems with PEGylation, including the slow release of loaded drugs, the failure of fusion with endosomes after internalization, and the steric hindrance of PEG chains inhibiting the uptake of liposomes by target cells.

Liposomes prepared from gangliosides provide a layer of surface-charged groups with longer blood-circulation time. In addition, Oku and Namba have found that palmityl-D-glucuronide-modified liposomes decreased the MPS recognition rate and reduced the liver accumulation in vivo, thus increasing tumor accumulation, which in turn enhances the therapeutic efficacy of DOX in long-circulating liposomes. Nowadays, chitosan coating the surface of negatively charged liposomes has been found to improve the stability of liposomes and ensure the sustained release of drugs. Since chitosan is positively charged, it can reduce liposomes uptake by cells. Moreover, chitosan mucoadhesive properties will prolong the residence times at the site of drug absorption due to the increased contact of the carrier with the absorbing site. Based on these unique biological characteristics, chitosan-coated, drug-loaded liposomes have opened novel avenues for ocular drug delivery. In addition, the albumin coating of liposomes reduces the binding of serum proteins to liposomes and facilitates an increase in circulation time in the blood. Similarly, liposomes coated with the combination of polyvinyl alcohol and PEG also show a better long-circulating function. Giulimondi et al. exposed DNA-decorated lipoplexes to human plasma. These complexes were covered with an opsonin-deficient protein corona and the final synthesis product was a type of lipoplex covered by a proteonucleotidic corona, or “proteoDNAsome”. These experiments proved that this lipoplex has a more pronounced ability to evade capture by immune cells in vivo than PEGylated lipoplexes.

4.2. Actively Targeted Liposomes

Many liposome nanocarriers have been approved to deliver antitumor drugs in a passively targeted manner. However, passive targeting does not distinguish between normal and diseased cells. Therefore, targeted liposomes have been developed to increase the localization and accumulation of liposome drugs in tumor tissues. Active targeting liposomes can improve drug efficacy and reduce side effects through two strategies: by targeting the overexpressed surface receptors of cancer cells and by targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME). Ligands for actively targeted liposomes include antibodies, proteins, peptides, vitamins, growth factors, aptamers, etc.

4.2.1. Surface Modification of Liposomes with Antibodies

Most studies in the field of targeted liposomes involve the use of multiple antibodies for tumor targeting purposes. Conjugation of anti-CD22 monoclonal antibodies to PEGylated DOX-loaded liposomes increases the accumulation of DOX in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma xenografts and improves antitumor efficacy without increasing toxicity. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) is highly expressed in a significant proportion of breast, ovarian, and gastric cancers and is under-expressed in normal cells, so targeted drug delivery for cancer can be carried out by coupling ligands targeting HER2. Trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, is conjugated to paclitaxel-loaded PEGylated liposomes to increase drug accumulation and antitumor efficacy in tumors. In addition, the combination of a single-chain fragment antibody against HER2 with DOX-loaded liposomes increases the accumulation of DOX in breast cancer tumors and has better tumor control than free DOX and untargeted liposomal DOX. Milatuzumab, a CD74 antagonist monoclonal antibody, is highly toxic to chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells when added to liposomes. CD19 is expressed in most acute B-ALL cells, does not shed from the surface of malignant cells and is internalized after antibody binding, so CD19 can be used as a target antigen. Vinu et al. found that anti-CD19 antibodies conjugated with DOX-encapsulated liposomes rapidly internalized in a clathrin-dependent manner, which could lead to an increase in DOX levels in tumor cells.

4.2.2. Surface Modification of Liposomes with Folic Acid

Folic acid is a water-soluble vitamin that binds to the folate receptor (FR) with high affinity and induces receptor-mediated endocytosis. The FR is rarely expressed in normal cells, but is overexpressed in certain lung, ovarian, colon, breast, brain and kidney tumors. Studies have found that FR can be expressed in different cells and can be selectively targeted. For instance, folate receptor alpha is expressed in a number of epithelial cancers, particularly epithelial ovarian cancer, whereas folate receptor beta is mainly restricted to macrophages. Folate-targeted liposomes have successfully delivered chemotherapeutic agents as well as genes, antisense oligonucleotides and radionuclides to tumor cells with overexpressed FR. Wu et al. compared FR-targeted paclitaxel liposomes with untargeted paclitaxel-loaded liposomes and found that the former had greater cytotoxicity activity and longer terminal half-life. Kareen et al. demonstrated that folate-targeted liposomal DOX had the potential to enhance in vivo anticancer drug delivery in the treatment of KB tumor mouse models. Folic acid conjugated PEGylated liposomes exhibit high antitumor efficacy through their increased drug solubility and increased circulating half-life.

4.2.3. Surface Modification of Liposomes with Transferrin (Tf)

Tf can specifically bind to the transferrin receptor (TfR), which is highly expressed on the surface of tumor cells. Thus, it can be bound to drug delivery systems for specific targeting. TfRs are overexpressed in tumor and leukemia cells. Tf conjugation to DOX-loaded stealth liposomes increases DOX delivery to tumors and inhibits tumor growth compared with untargeted DOX-loaded liposomes. Compared with untargeted liposomes, cisplatin-encapsulated transferrin-conjugated PEGylated liposomes not only increase accumulation in free tumor cells in ascites, but also in solid tumor tissues of the greater omentum. In Colon 26 tumor-bearing animals, Tf-PEG-liposomes have shown a prolonged residence period in the circulation and low reticuloendothelial system absorption, resulting in improved extravasation of the liposomes into the solid tumor tissue and a boosting of the drug uptake into tumor cells through endocytosis. TfRs are also expressed in some normal cells, so Tf liposomes may enhance intracellular DOX uptake and cytotoxicity to these normal cells. Particular attention should be paid to its cardiotoxicity.

4.2.4. Surface Modification of Liposomes with Peptides

Peptide-mediated liposomes are widely used to deliver anticancer drugs and siRNA due to their various advantages. Their structure is modifiable and smaller than antibodies, making them easy to chemically synthesize in order to meet targeting needs. To achieve a more effective targeting of nanocarriers, phage display libraries have recently been studied to facilitate peptide-mediated liposomal drug delivery. Receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) are overexpressed in breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer cells, but are not expressed detectably in most visceral organs. PEGylated paclitaxel-loaded liposomes conjugated with LHRH peptides significantly enhance tumor accumulation and the anticancer efficacy of all delivery systems and minimize adverse side effects on healthy tissues over untargeted paclitaxel-loaded liposomes. Cell-penetrating peptides translocate a variety of cargoes into the cells in a non-invasive manner without the use of receptors to enhance carrier internalization. Penetratin, a type of cell-penetrating peptide, can penetrate neurons and accumulate in the nucleus. Bruna et al. modified the surface of liposomes with Tf protein and Penetratin for the efficient delivery of targeted genes to neuronal cells. Bifunctional Penetratin Tf-liposomes can protect plasmid DNA from enzymatic degradation while providing low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficiency.

4.2.5. Surface Modification of Liposomes with Aptamers

Aptamers are short single-stranded DNA or RNA that can specifically bind to corresponding targets such as proteins and cells through their unique three-dimensional pattern. Aptamers have been demonstrated to be superior and the fastest novel tools for efficiently targeting cancer biomarkers and are employed as effective ligands for drug delivery and anticancer therapy. Aptamers possess several intrinsic advantages, including easy synthesis, convenient modification, high programmability, and good biocompatibility. Dihua et al. developed a nucleic acid aptamer, sgc8, for the highly specific recognition of human acute lymphatic leukemia cells. To investigate the ability of the tumor-targeting IL-4Rα-aptamer liposome-cytosine phosphate guanine oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) delivery system to introduce CpG into tumors and overcome immunosuppressive TME, Liu et al. found that IL-4Rα-liposome-CpG therapy showed enhanced antitumor activity in CT26 tumor-bearing mice compared with the control group.

4.2.6. Targeting the TME

In addition to targeting cancer cell surface receptors, tumor-specific active targeting can also target the TME. Nanomedicine can be used to target TME-specific molecular markers such as extracellular matrix components, tumor-specific pathophysiological circumstances, and TME-specific enzymes. Liposomes can block tumor diffusion by targeting the tumor vasculature. Targeting TME with chemical ligands shows great potential in improving the targeting efficiency of drug delivery and the efficacy of cancer therapy due to the many unique characteristics of TME components (Table 2).

4.3. Stimuli-Responsive Liposomes

Surface modification of liposomes can attach ligands for site-specific targeting. In addition, chemical moieties can be attached to the surface of the liposomes, which are called stimuli-responsive liposomes (smart liposomes), that will respond to various different stimuli. When certain external or internal signals occur, stimuli-responsive liposomes release their loaded contents at specific sites. These stimuli can be internal (e.g., enzyme activity, pH changes, redox potential, etc.) or external (e.g., temperature, light, magnetic field, or ultrasound). Stimuli-responsive liposomes can trigger drug release and increase the controllability of treatment in space and time. The intelligently engineered liposomes are important for delivering chemotherapy drugs because they provide higher concentrations of diagnostic or therapeutic drugs at the site of disease. Over the past few years, many different stimuli-responsive liposomes have been developed (Figure 3) (Table 3).

4.4. Cell Membrane-Coated Liposomes

Nanotechnology has been increasingly used for drug delivery to further improve clinical efficacy. Surface modification of liposomes can prolong blood circulation time and enhance targeted drug delivery. Most nanoparticle-based delivery methods concentrate largely on synthetic techniques, which frequently need cumbersome chemical production. In addition, synthetic materials are not satisfactorily biocompatible and are difficult to manufacture on a large scale. With the in-depth study of nanomedicine, it has been discovered that combining synthetic nanoparticles with natural biomaterials, such as cell membranes, directly imparts highly complex functional surfaces and effective biological interfaces with nanocarriers. The platform of cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles has emerged as an innovative delivery method with the potential to enhance therapeutic effectiveness for the treatment of a range of ailments. Cell membrane-coated liposomes are a new class of biomimetic nanoliposomes that combine the customizability and flexibility of synthetic materials, as well as the functionality and complexity of natural materials. They offer long cycle times, high biocompatibility, targeting capabilities, and simultaneous multidrug delivery.

At present, many types of membranes have been used to construct biomimetic nanoliposomes for cancer treatment, including membranes for red blood cells (RBCs), leukocytes, platelets, cancer cells, bacteria, stem cells, etc. Liposomes have diverse functions depending on the kind of cell membrane.

4.4.1. RBC Membrane-Coated Liposomes

In 2011, a cell membrane coating technology that used RBC membranes as membrane materials was first reported. RBCs, the most abundant cells in the blood, are mainly responsible for oxygen delivery within the body and have a lifespan of up to 120 days in humans. This technology inhibits immune attack to prolong blood circulation time, mediated by markers including CD47 molecules on the surface of RBCs and a series of complementary regulatory proteins. This property of the erythrocyte membrane is highly desired for nanodrug delivery systems. Cell membrane coating technology provides a top-down approach by transferring the entire erythrocyte membrane directly to the synthetic nanoparticles. Li et al. anchored the peptide ligand derived from the cytoplasmic protein P4.2 on the surface of cationic liposomes. The peptide of P4.2 specifically recognized the cytoplasmic domain of erythrocyte key transmembrane receptor band 3, thereby preparing RBC membrane-coated liposomes (Figure 4A). RBC membrane-coated liposomes exhibit an appropriate size distribution and high stability, resulting in better circulation time compared with conventional PEGylated liposomes.

4.4.2. Leukocyte Membrane-Coated Liposomes

Leukocytes, which include many diverse subsets including neutrophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes and others, are another major component of cells in the blood circulation. Leukocytes are widely found in blood vessels, lymphatic vessels and other tissues. The majority of leukocytes are capable of deformation movement, which facilitates their easy migration between lymphatic and blood vessels. Leukocytes make their home at the lesion sites, penetrate the vascular system, evade immune clearance, and target metastatic cancer cells through interaction of VCAM-1-α4 integrins. Therefore, leukocyte membrane-coated liposomes are usually proposed for cancer drug delivery. VCAM-1 is highly expressed in murine 4T1 breast cancer cells, therefore, in vivo, macrophage membranes retaining integrin α4β1 enable liposomes to target metastatic cells and produce a notable inhibitory effect on lung metastasis of breast cancer (Figure 4B). Due to their inflammatory chemotaxis, tumor-associated macrophages are a suitable drug delivery carrier for tumor targeting. For example, liposomes loaded with anticancer drug emtansine are coated with membranes from RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. NK cells can attack cancer cells directly through inhibitory and activating receptors on their cell surfaces or kill cells that have not been previously sensitized. A biomimetic system of fusogenic liposomes loaded with DOX has demonstrated excellent tumor-homing efficacy, high affinity for malignancy, and anticancer activity when coated with NK cell membranes.

4.4.3. Platelet Membrane-Coated Liposomes

Platelets are cell debris that are detached from the cytoplasm of mature megakaryocytes in the body’s bone marrow. In the blood circulation system, platelets mainly play a role in hemostasis and coagulation, supporting nutrition and repairing vascular endothelium. In addition, platelets also play an important role in regulating the body’s host immunity and inflammatory response. Because the platelet membrane has a CD47 receptor, it has the ability to escape phagocytosis in the systemic circulation. In addition, the platelet membrane selectively adheres to the vasculatures of the disease sites, and can also specifically aggregate around circulating tumor cells through P-selection and CD44 receptors. Guo et al. have successfully prepared a biomimetic drug delivery system for cancer treatment using a platelet membrane as the outer shell and an alkyl radical generator-loaded C-TiO2 hollow nanoshell as the inner core. Yang et al. prepared platelet membrane-coated hybrid microbubbles (Pla-MBs) by ultrasound-assisted recombination of liposomes and platelets. Pla-MBs were supplied with numerous adhesive receptors by coating with platelet membranes, allowing them to target and detect sepsis-induced acute kidney damage.

4.4.4. Cancer Cell Membrane-Coated Liposomes

Cell coating technology is applicable to membranes of cancer cells as well as blood-derived cells. In recent years, scientists have also used cancer cell membranes as biomimetic membranes to wrap nanoparticles. Cancer cells have an inherent feature that allows them to cling to one another, causing tumors to develop indefinitely. Cancer cells have multiple tumor-associated antigens on their surfaces, allowing them to target specific tumor locations via intrinsic homotypic binding. It is possible to deliver tumor antigens to the tumor site using liposomes coated with cancer cell membranes that have undergone in vitro processing. This will activate the innate immune response, which will destroy the cancer cells. Tang et al. have developed a biomimetic mesoporous nano-enzyme system coated with cancer cells for self-enhancing catalytic therapy of drug-resistant tumors. For tumor cell-selective glycan engineering, Liu et al. created pH-responsive azidosugar liposomes disguised with natural cancer-cell membrane. The biomimetic liposomes were able to detect lung metastases of malignancies in addition to selective glycan imaging of various cancer cells and breast cancer subtypes. Zhang et al. constructed an integrated hybrid nanovesicle cancer cell membrane liposome by fusing cancer cell membranes and a charge-reversal liposome membrane of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) switchable peptide (Figure 4C). This cancer liposome has a number of distinguishing and desired characteristics, including a long circulation half-life, effective homogenous lung cancer-targeting capacity, outstanding biocompatibility, high tumor accumulation, and more.

4.4.5. Stem Cell Membrane-Coated Liposomes

During multilineage differentiation, stem cells have a great capacity for self-replication. At various phases of development, stem cells have a natural active target impact on solid tumors. Therefore, coating stem cell membranes on nanoparticles makes it possible to fabricate nanocarriers with similar targeting functions. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the unique ability to home and engraft in tumor stroma. As a result, MSCs are regarded as viable therapeutic vehicles for the targeting of major cells in a variety of pathological locales. Wu et al. functionalized the curcumin-loaded liposomes with the membranes of MSCs, enabling biomimetic vesicles to have multiple functions such as long circulation, targeting and controlled drug release. Liu et al. constructed a macrophage immunity reconstruction strategy by activating macrophages with stem cell biomimetic liposomes carrying levamisole for leukemia therapy. In this study, biomimetic liposomes garner unique properties such as long circulation, low immunogenicity and homing effect by incorporating the membranes of MSCs. A new method, known as membrane fusion, has recently been proposed to provide targeted characteristics for liposomes by fusing them into cell membrane vesicles, resulting in liposomes. Membrane fusion liposomes have the advantages of good stability, long circulation half-life and low immunogenicity. Liposomes have an exact replica of the targeting properties of membrane vesicles.

4.4.6. Hybrid Cell Membrane-Coated Liposomes

Many of the cell types discussed so far highlight the unique functional properties of nanocarriers that can be given by cell membrane coating technology. Sometimes, it is also desirable to combine the functions of multiple cell types into one nanoparticle, that is, to integrate two different biofilms to encapsulate nanoparticles and maximize function. According to research, core coating or the integration of liposome nanocarriers has no influence on the distinct properties of various cell membranes. To increase solubility and targeting, a liposome-based delivery system was disguised by a hybrid cell membrane (RBC membrane and cancer cell membrane) and RGD surface modifications. The hybrid membrane-coated liposomes have an extended half-life, increased immune evasion and targeted ability at the tumor site as well as good antitumor activity without side effects to normal tissue. He et al. fused together the membranes of leukocytes, cancer cells, and liposome nanocarriers simultaneously to prepare leukosomes. Compared with Liposomal nanoparticles made of exogenous phospholipids only or in combination with one type of cell membrane, the leukosomes prolonged blood circulation time, improved the efficiency of tumor site accumulation, and effectively inhibited tumor growth.

5.1. Liposomes for Cancer Therapy

Compared with traditional drug delivery systems, liposomes exhibit better biological properties, including high biocompatibility, low toxicity, easy surface modification, high targeting, encapsulation of various drugs, and protection from degradation. Given these merits, several liposomal drug products have been successfully approved and used in clinics over recent decades (Table 4). Among these, Doxil (Doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) was the first liposomal product approved by the FDA in 1995. In fact, the progress of nanoliposomes has promoted the treatment of cancer.

ThermoDox®, a liposomal drug carrier with lyso-thermosensitive liposomal DOX, is the first heat-activated formulation to be used in human clinical studies. When the temperature rises to 40–45 °C, the thermosensitive liposomes rapidly change their structure to release DOX into the targeted site. In clinical trials, ThermoDox® has been combined with radiofrequency ablation to treat hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the OPTIMA trial did not achieve the endpoints, though this did not mean that ThermoDox® was not feasible. Early clinical data of ThermoDox® has demonstrated feasibility, safety and activity. Currently, in a new phase I trial, the University of Oxford explored the safety and feasibility of combining ThermoDox® with focused ultrasound for the treatment of non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Josanne S et al. first explored the phase I feasibility study of a combination of ThermoDox®, cyclophosphamide, and magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced hyperthermia in patients with stage IV breast cancer.

Myocet®, a non-PEGylated liposomal DOX, is combined with cyclophosphamide for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Compared with free DOX and cyclophosphamide, Myocet® reduces cardiotoxicity and retains its antitumor efficacy. EndoTAG-1™, a paclitaxel-loaded cationic liposome formulation, has been approved by the FDA. Cationic liposomes have been shown to target angiogenesis endothelial cells specifically, therefore, EndoTAG-1™ can inhibit tumor growth and metastasis by reducing tumor blood supply. Sebastian et al. demonstrated, in a phase I/II trial of EndoTAG-1, that infusion of 32 mg total lipid/kg body weight EndoTAG-1 was safe and had an antiangiogenic effect in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Cisplatin is a highly cytotoxic drug that inhibits DNA synthesis in tumor cells by creating inter-and intrachain cross-links. Therefore, cisplatin is still the first-line chemotherapy drug for various cancer types. However, cisplatin has serious side effects including nephrotoxicity, nausea and vomiting, ototoxicity, and allergic responses. To reduce the systemic toxicity of cisplatin, cisplatin liposomal preparations have been developed. Lipoplatinum is an FDA-approved cytotoxic agent that prolongs the circulating half-life of drugs, increases cell permeability, and accumulates drugs in tumor tissue. Yang et al. encapsulated the first-generation platinum anticancer agent cisplatin and phenethyl isothiocyanate in liposomes to treat non-small cell lung carcinomas. The liposomal preparation enhanced the toxicity of this doublet to NCI-H596 non-small cell lung carcinomas cells.

Onivyde™, an IRI liposome injection, was approved by the FDA in 2015 for the second-line treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It is a long-circulating liposomal topoisomerase inhibitor that blocks DNA replication in cancer cells. Onivyde™ can increase the accumulation of IRI at the tumor site through the EPR effect. In human colon (HT29) and breast (BT474) cancer xenograft models, compared with free IRI, the liposomal IRI has an increased drug loading and prolonged drug half-life, resulting in a significant increase in cytotoxic activity. Onivyde™, in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil, is intended for the treatment of patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have progressed following gemcitabine-based therapy. On 9 November 2022, French pharmaceutical company Ipsen announced that the Phase III clinical trial of Onivyde™ plus 5-fluorouracil/calcium leucovorin and oxaliplatin, as the first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, had reached the primary endpoint.

In addition to clinical liposomal preparations, many novel liposomal drug delivery systems for cancer therapy are being developed in the laboratory. Platinum nanoparticles (nano-Pt) are highly cytotoxic and kill cancer cells by leaching Pt ions under low pH conditions. Meanwhile, nano-Pt is also a catalase-like nanozyme. Therefore, it can be used as an oxygen-replenishing nanomaterial to solve the problem of hypoxia limitation in photodynamic therapy. Liu et al. prepared biomimetic liposome nanoplatinum by encapsulating nano-Pt and the photosensitizer vitepofen in macrophage membrane-coated liposomes. This liposome delivery system achieved deeper tumor tissue penetration while enhancing chemotherapy effectiveness with nano-Pt catalyzed oxygen delivery. Coupling MT1-MMP-activated cilengitide (MC) to DOX-loaded thermosensitive liposomes produces a novel smart nanovesicle MC-T-DOX, which can improve tumor blood perfusion, drug delivery, and treatment of pancreatic cancer by selectively stimulating tumor angiogenesis. Shen et al. proposed a PEGylated liposome loaded with mannose and levamisole hydrochloride to inhibit tumor growth. This suppresses tumor growth by restraining glycolysis and mitochondrial energy metabolism in cancer cells and macrophages. In addition, liposomes, used with radiotherapy, not only enhance the therapeutic effect of local tumors, but also increase the immune response to inhibit metastatic lesions. Xing et al. developed a liposome-based, light-triggered efficient sequential delivery method for multimodal chemotherapy, antiangiogenic and anti-myeloid-derived suppressor cell therapy in melanoma. This delivery strategy demonstrates the effectiveness of cancer multimodal therapy targeting multiple targets at different spatial locations in the TME.

5.2. Liposomes for Vaccines

Due to their adaptability and excellent biocompatibility, liposomes can be utilized as adjuvants in vaccines. It has been demonstrated that the encapsulation of peptide antigens or viral membrane proteins into liposomes results in humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, as well as strong and long-lasting immunity against the pathogen. DNA/RNA and protein payloads may be shielded against biodegradation by liposome formulations. Furthermore, their transfection effectiveness may be improved by altering surface charge, size, and lipid structure. Liposomes were initially described as immunological adjuvants by Gregoriadis and Allison in 1974. With the continuous development of nanotechnology in the medical field, new liposomes have been developed. At least eight liposome-based adjuvant systems are now authorized for use in humans or being tested in clinical settings.

In the midst of the SARS-CoV-2 viral pandemic, the first vaccines based on lipid nanoparticles and mRNA of the virus spike’s full-size S-protein were promptly put into the clinic. Due to their extreme fragility, mRNA molecules require the assistance of a nano-delivery vector to be properly transferred to the target region and perform. Liposomes are used to protect the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, increasing their in vitro and in vivo stability.

6. Challenges for Liposomes

With the deepening of nanotechnology research, liposomes as anti-tumor drug carrier treatment approaches and methods are increasingly widely used and have formed a phased development process. However, few lipid preparation agents have been successfully marketed, indicating that the development of liposomes still faces difficulties and challenges in the process of transformation from scientific research to clinical application. Among the many challenges, the stability of liposomes is crucial, which determines the changes in drug load, permeability, and drug release rate during the preparation, storage and metabolism of drug-loaded liposomes. The physical and chemical instability of liposomes greatly limits their clinical application as drug carriers (Table 5). The liposome membrane is a dynamic phospholipid membrane. Phospholipids can continuously undergo transmembrane movement, thereby inducing liposome particles to aggregate, sediment and form unstable phospholipid membranes, resulting in the instability of the physical morphological structure of liposomes. Oxidation and hydrolysis of phospholipids are the two main mechanisms that lead to the chemical instability of liposomes. In addition, selecting the appropriate method for sterilization of liposome preparations is a huge challenge. At present, sterilization methods include steam sterilization, filtration sterilization and γ-ray radiation sterilization. Liposomes are susceptible to a variety of chemical and physical degradation mechanisms. The use of heat, radiation and toxic chemicals may alter the physicochemical properties of liposomal components and lead to increased toxicity of the final product.

7. Conclusions

Understanding the exact mechanism by which liposomes reach tumor sites and release loaded drugs is critical to resolving existing cancer therapy problems. Today, several liposome delivery technologies targeted for tumor targeting are being tested in clinical trials. With in-depth study, functionalized liposomes have evolved from simple vesicle structures to stimuli-responsive and cell membrane-coated liposomes. We can produce multifunctional nanocarriers by coupling numerous types of ligands on a single carrier using various surface modification methods of nanomaterials. In tumor treatment, multifunctional liposomes with prolonged release, targeted distribution, triggered release, and synergistic actions employing diverse surface functionalization and modification approaches will be essential. Liposomes have undergone multiple evolutions in terms of ingredients and manufacturing technique to overcome their early limitations. Nevertheless, the critical challenges of liposomes are their physical and chemical stability. Consequently, there is an essential requirement to develop liposomes with high stability, which has a significant impact on their clinical applications.

References 150

  1. 1.

    Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209-249.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21660

  2. 2.

    Niculescu A.-G., Grumezescu A.M. Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5253.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms23095253

  3. 3.

    Bangham A.D., Standish M.M., Watkins J.C. Diffusion of Univalent Ions across the Lamellae of Swollen Phospholipids. J. Mol. Biol. 1965;13:238-252.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80093-6

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Sabir F., Barani M., Rahdar A., Bilal M., Zafar M.N., Bungau S., Kyzas G.Z. How to Face Skin Cancer with Nanomaterials: A Review. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020;11:11931-11955.

    Not in our library10.33263/briac114.1193111955

  6. 6.

    Watson D.S., Endsley A.N., Huang L. Design Considerations for Liposomal Vaccines: Influence of Formulation Parameters on Antibody and Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to Liposome Associated Antigens. Vaccine. 2012;30:2256-2272.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.070

  7. 7.

    dos Santos Rodrigues B., Banerjee A., Kanekiyo T., Singh J. Functionalized Liposomal Nanoparticles for Efficient Gene Delivery System to Neuronal Cell Transfection. Int. J. Pharm. 2019;566:717-730.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.026

  8. 8.

    Marqués-Gallego P., de Kroon A.I.P.M. Ligation Strategies for Targeting Liposomal Nanocarriers. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:129458.

    Not in our library10.1155/2014/129458

  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Immordino M.L., Dosio F., Cattel L. Stealth Liposomes: Review of the Basic Science, Rationale, and Clinical Applications, Existing and Potential. Int. J. Nanomed. 2006;1:297-315.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Wang H., Huang Y. Combination Therapy Based on Nano Codelivery for Overcoming Cancer Drug Resistance. Med. Drug Discov. 2020;6:100024.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100024

  13. 13.

    Lei W., Yang C., Wu Y., Ru G., He X., Tong X., Wang S. Nanocarriers Surface Engineered with Cell Membranes for Cancer Targeted Chemotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:45.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12951-022-01251-w

  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Obaid G., Bano S., Thomsen H., Callaghan S., Shah N., Swain J.W.R., Jin W., Ding X., Cameron C.G., McFarland S.A., et al. Remediating Desmoplasia with EGFR-Targeted Photoactivable Multi-Inhibitor Liposomes Doubles Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Adv. Sci. 2022;9:2104594.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.202104594

  17. 17.

    Zhao Z., Fang L., Xiao P., Sun X., Zhou L., Liu X., Wang J., Wang G., Cao H., Zhang P., et al. Walking Dead Tumor Cells for Targeted Drug Delivery Against Lung Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:e2205462.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202205462

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    Liposomes|SpringerLink.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Sahoo S.K., Labhasetwar V. Nanotech Approaches to Drug Delivery and Imaging. Drug Discov. Today. 2003;8:1112-1120.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02903-9

  21. 21.

    Zhang G., Sun J. Lipid in Chips: A Brief Review of Liposomes Formation by Microfluidics. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021;16:7391-7416.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s331639

  22. 22.

    Large D.E., Abdelmessih R.G., Fink E.A., Auguste D.T. Liposome Composition in Drug Delivery Design, Synthesis, Characterization, and Clinical Application. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021;176:113851.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2021.113851

  23. 23.

    Nomura S.M., Tsumoto K., Hamada T., Akiyoshi K., Nakatani Y., Yoshikawa K. Gene Expression within Cell-Sized Lipid Vesicles. ChemBioChem. 2003;4:1172-1175.

    Not in our library10.1002/cbic.200300630

  24. 24.

    Otake K., Shimomura T., Goto T., Imura T., Furuya T., Yoda S., Takebayashi Y., Sakai H., Abe M. Preparation of Liposomes Using an Improved Supercritical Reverse Phase Evaporation Method. Langmuir. 2006;22:2543-2550.

    Not in our library10.1021/la051654u

  25. 25.

    Gouda A., Sakr O.S., Nasr M., Sammour O. Ethanol Injection Technique for Liposomes Formulation: An Insight into Development, Influencing Factors, Challenges and Applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021;61:102174.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102174

  26. 26.

    Lapinski M.M., Castro-Forero A., Greiner A.J., Ofoli R.Y., Blanchard G.J. Comparison of Liposomes Formed by Sonication and Extrusion: Rotational and Translational Diffusion of an Embedded Chromophore. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids. 2007;23:11677-11683.

    Not in our library10.1021/la7020963

  27. 27.

    Barnadas-Rodríguez R., Sabés M. Factors Involved in the Production of Liposomes with a High-Pressure Homogenizer. Int. J. Pharm. 2001;213:175-186.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00661-x

  28. 28.

    Pupo E., Padrón A., Santana E., Sotolongo J., Quintana D., Dueñas S., Duarte C., de la Rosa M.C., Hardy E. Preparation of Plasmid DNA-Containing Liposomes Using a High-Pressure Homogenization–Extrusion Technique. J. Control. Release. 2005;104:379-396.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.02.001

  29. 29.

    Castile J.D., Taylor K.M. Factors Affecting the Size Distribution of Liposomes Produced by Freeze-Thaw Extrusion. Int. J. Pharm. 1999;188:87-95.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00207-0

  30. 30.

    Hood R.R., DeVoe D.L. High-Throughput Continuous Flow Production of Nanoscale Liposomes by Microfluidic Vertical Flow Focusing. Small. 2015;11:5790-5799.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201501345

  31. 31.

    Yu B., Lee R.J., Lee L.J. Microfluidic Methods for Production of Liposomes. Methods Enzymol. 2009;465:129-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0076-6879(09)65007-2

  32. 32.

    Whitesides G.M. The Origins and the Future of Microfluidics. Nature. 2006;442:368-373.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05058

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Jahn A., Vreeland W.N., Gaitan M., Locascio L.E. Controlled Vesicle Self-Assembly in Microfluidic Channels with Hydrodynamic Focusing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:2674-2675.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja0318030

  35. 35.

    Jahn A., Vreeland W.N., DeVoe D.L., Locascio L.E., Gaitan M. Microfluidic Directed Formation of Liposomes of Controlled Size. Langmuir. 2007;23:6289-6293.

    Not in our library10.1021/la070051a

  36. 36.

    Maeki M., Kimura N., Sato Y., Harashima H., Tokeshi M. Advances in Microfluidics for Lipid Nanoparticles and Extracellular Vesicles and Applications in Drug Delivery Systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;128:84-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.008

  37. 37.

    Filipczak N., Pan J., Yalamarty S.S.K., Torchilin V.P. Recent Advancements in Liposome Technology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020;156:4-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.022

  38. 38.

    Hood R.R., DeVoe D.L., Atencia J., Vreeland W.N., Omiatek D.M. A Facile Route to the Synthesis of Monodisperse Nanoscale Liposomes Using 3D Microfluidic Hydrodynamic Focusing in a Concentric Capillary Array. Lab. Chip. 2014;14:2403-2409.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4lc00334a

  39. 39.

    Koh C.G., Zhang X., Liu S., Golan S., Yu B., Yang X., Guan J., Jin Y., Talmon Y., Muthusamy N., et al. Delivery of Antisense Oligodeoxyribonucleotide Lipopolyplex Nanoparticles Assembled by Microfluidic Hydrodynamic Focusing. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2010;141:62-69.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.019

  40. 40.

    Jahn A., Lucas F., Wepf R.A., Dittrich P.S. Freezing Continuous-Flow Self-Assembly in a Microfluidic Device: Toward Imaging of Liposome Formation.

    Not in our library10.1021/la303675g

  41. 41.

    Zhigaltsev I.V., Belliveau N., Hafez I., Leung A.K.K., Huft J., Hansen C., Cullis P.R. Bottom-Up Design and Synthesis of Limit Size Lipid Nanoparticle Systems with Aqueous and Triglyceride Cores Using Millisecond Microfluidic Mixing. Langmuir. 2012;28:3633-3640.

    Not in our library10.1021/la204833h

  42. 42.

    Stroock A.D., Dertinger S.K.W., Ajdari A., Mezic I., Stone H.A., Whitesides G.M. Chaotic Mixer for Microchannels. (Reports). Science. 2002;295:647.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1066238

  43. 43.

    Maeki M., Saito T., Sato Y., Yasui T., Kaji N., Ishida A., Tani H., Baba Y., Harashima H., Tokeshi M. A Strategy for Synthesis of Lipid Nanoparticles Using Microfluidic Devices with a Mixer Structure. RSC Adv. 2015;5:46181-46185.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra04690d

  44. 44.

    Lee C.-Y., Wang W.-T., Liu C.-C., Fu L.-M. Passive Mixers in Microfluidic Systems: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;288:146-160.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.122

  45. 45.
  46. 46.

    Bernier-Latmani J., Petrova T.V. Intestinal Lymphatic Vasculature: Structure, Mechanisms and Functions. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;14:510-526.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2017.79

  47. 47.

    Gustafson H.H., Holt-Casper D., Grainger D.W., Ghandehari H. Nanoparticle Uptake: The Phagocyte Problem. Nano Today. 2015;10:487-510.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006

  48. 48.

    Zhao Z., Ukidve A., Kim J., Mitragotri S. Targeting Strategies for Tissue-Specific Drug Delivery. Cell. 2020;181:151-167.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.001

  49. 49.

    Harashima H., Sakata K., Funato K., Kiwada H. Enhanced Hepatic Uptake of Liposomes through Complement Activation Depending on the Size of Liposomes. Pharm. Res. 1994;11:402-406.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1018965121222

  50. 50.

    Huckaby J.T., Lai S.K. PEGylation for Enhancing Nanoparticle Diffusion in Mucus. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;124:125-139.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2017.08.010

  51. 51.

    Wang Y.-Y., Lai S.K., Suk J.S., Pace A., Cone R., Hanes J. Addressing the PEG Mucoadhesivity Paradox to Engineer Nanoparticles That “Slip” through the Human Mucus Barrier. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:9726-9729.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200803526

  52. 52.

    Kaldybekov D.B., Tonglairoum P., Opanasopit P., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Mucoadhesive Maleimide-Functionalised Liposomes for Drug Delivery to Urinary Bladder. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018;111:83-90.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2017.09.039

  53. 53.

    Tonglairoum P., Brannigan R.P., Opanasopit P., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Maleimide-Bearing Nanogels as Novel Mucoadhesive Materials for Drug Delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016;4:6581-6587.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6tb02124g

  54. 54.

    Brannigan R.P., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Progress and Current Trends in the Synthesis of Novel Polymers with Enhanced Mucoadhesive Properties. Macromol. Biosci. 2019;19:1900194.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201900194

  55. 55.

    Mura S., Nicolas J., Couvreur P. Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:991-1003.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat3776

  56. 56.

    Mishra S., Webster P., Davis M.E. PEGylation Significantly Affects Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Trafficking of Non-Viral Gene Delivery Particles. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2004;83:97-111.

    Not in our library10.1078/0171-9335-00363

  57. 57.

    Oku N., Namba Y. Glucuronate-Modified, Long-Circulating Liposomes for the Delivery of Anticancer Agents. Methods Enzymol. 2005;391:145-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0076-6879(05)91008-2

  58. 58.

    Badran M.M., Alouny N.N., Aldosari B.N., Alhusaini A.M., Abou El Ela A.E.S. Transdermal Glipizide Delivery System Based on Chitosan-Coated Deformable Liposomes: Development, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Studies. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:826.

    Not in our library10.3390/pharmaceutics14040826

  59. 59.

    Chen H., Pan H., Li P., Wang H., Wang X., Pan W., Yuan Y. The Potential Use of Novel Chitosan-Coated Deformable Liposomes in an Ocular Drug Delivery System. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2016;143:455-462.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.061

  60. 60.

    Giulimondi F., Vulpis E., Digiacomo L., Giuli M.V., Mancusi A., Capriotti A.L., Laganà A., Cerrato A., Zenezini Chiozzi R., Nicoletti C., et al. Opsonin-Deficient Nucleoproteic Corona Endows UnPEGylated Liposomes with Stealth Properties In Vivo. ACS Nano. 2022;16:2088-2100.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.1c07687

  61. 61.

    Alshaer W., Hillaireau H., Vergnaud J., Ismail S., Fattal E. Functionalizing Liposomes with Anti-CD44 Aptamer for Selective Targeting of Cancer Cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015;26:1307-1313.

    Not in our library10.1021/bc5004313

  62. 62.

    Khan A.A., Allemailem K.S., Almatroodi S.A., Almatroudi A., Rahmani A.H. Recent Strategies towards the Surface Modification of Liposomes: An Innovative Approach for Different Clinical Applications. 3 Biotech. 2020;10:163.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13205-020-2144-3

  63. 63.

    Tuscano J.M., Martin S.M., Ma Y., Zamboni W., O’Donnell R.T. Efficacy, Biodistribution, and Pharmacokinetics of CD22-Targeted Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in a B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Xenograft Mouse Model. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2010;16:2760-2768.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3199

  64. 64.

    Tai W., Mahato R., Cheng K. The Role of HER2 in Cancer Therapy and Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2010;146:264-275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.04.009

  65. 65.

    Yang T., Choi M.-K., Cui F.-D., Lee S.-J., Chung S.-J., Shim C.-K., Kim D.-D. Antitumor Effect of Paclitaxel-Loaded PEGylated Immunoliposomes against Human Breast Cancer Cells. Pharm. Res. 2007;24:2402-2411.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11095-007-9425-y

  66. 66.

    Laginha K.M., Moase E.H., Yu N., Huang A., Allen T.M. Bioavailability and Therapeutic Efficacy of HER2 ScFv-Targeted Liposomal Doxorubicin in a Murine Model of HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer. J. Drug Target. 2008;16:605-610.

    Not in our library10.1080/10611860802229978

  67. 67.

    Krishnan V., Xu X., Kelly D., Snook A., Waldman S.A., Mason R.W., Jia X., Rajasekaran A.K. CD19-Targeted Nanodelivery of Doxorubicin Enhances Thera peutic Efficacy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Mol. Pharm. 2015;12:2101-2111.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00071

  68. 68.

    O’Shannessy D.J., Somers E.B., Wang L., Wang H., Hsu R. Expression of Folate Receptors Alpha and Beta in Normal and Cancerous Gynecologic Tissues: Correlation of Expression of the Beta Isoform with Macrophage Markers. J. Ovarian Res. 2015;8:29.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13048-015-0156-0

  69. 69.

    Lu Y., Low P.S. Folate-Mediated Delivery of Macromolecular Anticancer Therapeutic Agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002;54:675-693.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00042-x

  70. 70.

    Ledermann J.A., Canevari S., Thigpen T. Targeting the Folate Receptor: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches to Personalize Cancer Treatments. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2015;26:2034-2043.

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdv250

  71. 71.

    Hilgenbrink A.R., Low P.S. Folate Receptor-Mediated Drug Targeting: From Therapeutics to Diagnostics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005;94:2135-2146.

    Not in our library10.1002/jps.20457

  72. 72.

    Wu J., Liu Q., Lee R.J. A Folate Receptor-Targeted Liposomal Formulation for Paclitaxel. Int. J. Pharm. 2006;316:148-153.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.027

  73. 73.

    Riviere K., Huang Z., Jerger K., Macaraeg N., Szoka F.C. Antitumor Effect of Folate-Targeted Liposomal Doxorubicin in KB Tumor-Bearing Mice after Intravenous Administration. J. Drug Target. 2011;19:14-24.

    Not in our library10.3109/10611861003733953

  74. 74.

    Li X., Ding L., Xu Y., Wang Y., Ping Q. Targeted Delivery of Doxorubicin Using Stealth Liposomes Modified with Transferrin. Int. J. Pharm. 2009;373:116-123.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.01.023

  75. 75.

    Iinuma H., Maruyama K., Okinaga K., Sasaki K., Sekine T., Ishida O., Ogiwara N., Johkura K., Yonemura Y. Intracellular Targeting Therapy of Cisplatin-Encapsulated Transferrin-Polyethylene Glycol Liposome on Peritoneal Dissemination of Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2002;99:130-137.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.10242

  76. 76.

    Ishida O., Maruyama K., Tanahashi H., Iwatsuru M., Sasaki K., Eriguchi M., Yanagie H. Liposomes Bearing Polyethyleneglycol-Coupled Transferrin with Intracellular Targeting Property to the Solid Tumors in Vivo. Pharm. Res. 2001;18:1042-1048.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1010960900254

  77. 77.

    Dharap S.S., Qiu B., Williams G.C., Sinko P., Stein S., Minko T. Molecular Targeting of Drug Delivery Systems to Ovarian Cancer by BH3 and LHRH Peptides. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2003;91:61-73.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00209-8

  78. 78.

    Dharap S.S., Wang Y., Chandna P., Khandare J.J., Qiu B., Gunaseelan S., Sinko P.J., Stein S., Farmanfarmaian A., Minko T. Tumor-Specific Targeting of an Anticancer Drug Delivery System by LHRH Peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:12962-12967.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0504274102

  79. 79.

    Saad M., Garbuzenko O.B., Ber E., Chandna P., Khandare J.J., Pozharov V.P., Minko T. Receptor Targeted Polymers, Dendrimers, Liposomes: Which Nanocarrier Is the Most Efficient for Tumor-Specific Treatment and Imaging? J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2008;130:107-114.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.024

  80. 80.

    Ramsey J.D., Flynn N.H. Cell-Penetrating Peptides Transport Therapeutics into Cells. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015;154:78-86.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.07.003

  81. 81.
  82. 82.

    Shangguan D., Li Y., Tang Z., Cao Z.C., Chen H.W., Mallikaratchy P., Sefah K., Yang C.J., Tan W. Aptamers Evolved from Live Cells as Effective Molecular Probes for Cancer Study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:11838-11843.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0602615103

  83. 83.

    Liu Y.-J., Dou X.-Q., Wang F., Zhang J., Wang X.-L., Xu G.-L., Xiang S.-S., Gao X., Fu J., Song H.-F. IL-4Rα Aptamer-Liposome-CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Suppress Tumour Growth by Targeting the Tumour Microenvironment. J. Drug Target. 2017;25:275-283.

    Not in our library10.1080/1061186x.2016.1258569

  84. 84.

    Katanasaka Y., Ida T., Asai T., Maeda N., Oku N. Effective Delivery of an Angiogenesis Inhibitor by Neovessel-Targeted Liposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;360:219-224.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.04.046

  85. 85.

    Kang D.I., Lee S., Lee J.T., Sung B.J., Yoon J.-Y., Kim J.-K., Chung J., Lim S.-J. Preparation and in Vitro Evaluation of Anti-VCAM-1-Fab’-Conjugated Liposomes for the Targeted Delivery of the Poorly Water-Soluble Drug Celecoxib. J. Microencapsul. 2011;28:220-227.

    Not in our library10.3109/02652048.2011.552989

  86. 86.

    Hatakeyama H., Akita H., Ishida E., Hashimoto K., Kobayashi H., Aoki T., Yasuda J., Obata K., Kikuchi H., Ishida T., et al. Tumor Targeting of Doxorubicin by Anti-MT1-MMP Antibody-Modified PEG Liposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 2007;342:194-200.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.04.037

  87. 87.

    Zangabad P.S., Mirkiani S., Shahsavari S., Masoudi B., Masroor M., Hamed H., Jafari Z., Taghipour Y.D., Hashemi H., Karimi M., et al. Stimulus-Responsive Liposomes as Smart Nanoplatforms for Drug Delivery Applications. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2018;7:95-122.

    Not in our library10.1515/ntrev-2017-0154

  88. 88.

    Lee Y., Thompson D.H. Stimuli-Responsive Liposomes for Drug Delivery. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2017;9:e1450.

    Not in our library10.1002/wnan.1450

  89. 89.

    Kong L., Zhang S., Chu J., Liu X., Zhang L., He S., Yang S., Ju R., Li X. Tumor Microenvironmental Responsive Liposomes Simultaneously Encapsulating Biological and Chemotherapeutic Drugs for Enhancing Antitumor Efficacy of NSCLC. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2020;15:6451-6468.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s258906

  90. 90.

    Yuba E., Tajima N., Yoshizaki Y., Harada A., Hayashi H., Kono K. Dextran Derivative-Based PH-Sensitive Liposomes for Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3091-3101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.024

  91. 91.

    Lou J., Best M.D. Reactive Oxygen Species-Responsive Liposomes via Boronate-Caged Phosphatidylethanolamine. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020;31:2220-2230.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00397

  92. 92.

    Ta T., Porter T.M. Thermosensitive Liposomes for Localized Delivery and Triggered Release of Chemotherapy. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2013;169:112-125.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.036

  93. 93.

    Yavlovich A., Smith B., Gupta K., Blumenthal R., Puri A. Light-Sensitive Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Design Principles and Future Considerations for Biological Applications. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2010;27:364-381.

    Not in our library10.3109/09687688.2010.507788

  94. 94.

    Sirsi S.R., Borden M.A. State-of-the-Art Materials for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014;72:3-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.010

  95. 95.

    Pourhassan H., Clergeaud G., Hansen A.E., Østrem R.G., Fliedner F.P., Melander F., Nielsen O.L., O’Sullivan C.K., Kjær A., Andresen T.L. Revisiting the Use of SPLA2-Sensitive Liposomes in Cancer Therapy. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2017;261:163-173.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.024

  96. 96.
  97. 97.

    Ferreira D.D.S., Lopes S.C.d.A., Franco M.S., Oliveira M.C. PH-Sensitive Liposomes for Drug Delivery in Cancer Treatment. Ther. Deliv. 2013;4:1099-1123.

    Not in our library10.4155/tde.13.80

  98. 98.

    Moku G., Gulla S.K., Nimmu N.V., Khalid S., Chaudhuri A. Delivering Anti-Cancer Drugs with Endosomal PH-Sensitive Anti-Cancer Liposomes. Biomater. Sci. 2016;4:627-638.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5bm00479a

  99. 99.

    Ong W., Yang Y., Cruciano A.C., McCarley R.L. Redox-Triggered Contents Release from Liposomes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14739-14744.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja8050469

  100. 100.

    de Smet M., Langereis S., van den Bosch S., Grüll H. Temperature-Sensitive Liposomes for Doxorubicin Delivery under MRI Guidance. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2010;143:120-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.12.002

  101. 101.

    Nardecchia S., Sánchez-Moreno P., de Vicente J., Marchal J.A., Boulaiz H. Clinical Trials of Thermosensitive Nanomaterials: An Overview. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:191.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano9020191

  102. 102.

    You J., Zhang P., Hu F., Du Y., Yuan H., Zhu J., Wang Z., Zhou J., Li C. Near-Infrared Light Sensitive Liposomes for the Enhanced Photothermal Tumor Treatment by the Combination with Chemotherapy. Pharm. Res. 2014;31:554-565.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11095-013-1180-7

  103. 103.

    Li Q., Tang Q., Zhang P., Wang Z., Zhao T., Zhou J., Li H., Ding Q., Li W., Hu F., et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Antibodies Enhance the Specificity and Anticancer Activity of Light-Sensitive Doxorubicin-Labeled Liposomes. Biomaterials. 2015;57:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.009

  104. 104.
  105. 105.

    Lin W., Ma X., Zhou C., Yang H., Yang Y., Xie X., Yang C., Han C. Development and Characteristics of Novel Sonosensitive Liposomes for Vincristine Bitartrate. Drug Deliv. 2019;26:724-731.

    Not in our library10.1080/10717544.2019.1639845

  106. 106.

    Yoshida M., Watanabe Y., Sato M., Maehara T., Aono H., Naohara T., Hirazawa H., Horiuchi A., Yukumi S., Sato K. Feasibility of Chemohyperthermia with Docetaxel-embedded Magnetoliposomes as Minimally Invasive Local Treatment for Cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;126:1955-1965.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.24864

  107. 107.

    Zeng Z., Wang X., Zhang Y., Liu X., Zhou W., Li N. Preparation and Characterization of Tegafur Magnetic Thermosensitive Liposomes. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2009;14:350-357.

    Not in our library10.1080/10837450802647300

  108. 108.

    Zhai Y., Su J., Ran W., Zhang P., Yin Q., Zhang Z., Yu H., Li Y. Preparation and Application of Cell Membrane-Camouflaged Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Theranostics. 2017;7:2575-2592.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.20118

  109. 109.

    Luk B.T., Zhang L. Cell Membrane-Camouflaged Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2015;220:600-607.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.019

  110. 110.

    Hu C.-M.J., Zhang L., Aryal S., Cheung C., Fang R.H., Zhang L. Erythrocyte Membrane-Camouflaged Polymeric Nanoparticles as a Biomimetic Delivery Platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:10980-10985.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1106634108

  111. 111.

    Xie J., Shen Q., Huang K., Zheng T., Cheng L., Zhang Z., Yu Y., Liao G., Wang X., Li C. Oriented Assembly of Cell-Mimicking Nanoparticles via a Molecular Affinity Strategy for Targeted Drug Delivery. ACS Nano. 2019;13:5268-5277.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.8b09681

  112. 112.

    Cao H., Dan Z., He X., Zhang Z., Yu H., Yin Q., Li Y. Liposomes Coated with Isolated Macrophage Membrane Can Target Lung Metastasis of Breast Cancer. ACS Nano. 2016;10:7738-7748.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.6b03148

  113. 113.

    Pitchaimani A., Nguyen T.D.T., Aryal S. Natural Killer Cell Membrane Infused Biomimetic Liposomes for Targeted Tumor Therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;160:124-137.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.018

  114. 114.
  115. 115.

    Fang R.H., Kroll A.V., Gao W., Zhang L. Cell Membrane Coating Nanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:e1706759.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201706759

  116. 116.

    Guo W., Wang T., Huang C., Ning S., Guo Q., Zhang W., Yang H., Zhu D., Huang Q., Qian H., et al. Platelet Membrane-Coated C-TiO2 Hollow Nanospheres for Combined Sonodynamic and Alkyl-Radical Cancer Therapy. Nano Res. 2022;1-10.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-022-4646-2

  117. 117.

    Yang J., Miao X., Guan Y., Chen C., Chen S., Zhang X., Xiao X., Zhang Z., Xia Z., Yin T., et al. Microbubble Functionalization with Platelet Membrane Enables Targeting and Early Detection of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021;10:e2101628.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.202101628

  118. 118.

    Tang W., Li X., Lyu M., Huang Q. Cancer Cell Membrane Biomimetic Mesoporous Nanozyme System with Efficient ROS Generation for Antitumor Chemoresistance. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:5089857.

    Not in our library10.1155/2022/5089857

  119. 119.

    Liu Z., Wang F., Liu X., Sang Y., Zhang L., Ren J., Qu X. Cell Membrane–Camouflaged Liposomes for Tumor Cell–Selective Glycans Engineering and Imaging in Vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2022769118.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2022769118

  120. 120.

    Zhang W., Gong C., Chen Z., Li M., Li Y., Gao J. Tumor Microenvironment-Activated Cancer Cell Membrane-Liposome Hybrid Nanoparticle-Mediated Synergistic Metabolic Therapy and Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:339.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12951-021-01085-y

  121. 121.

    Wu H., Jiang X., Li Y., Zhou Y., Zhang T., Zhi P., Gao J. Engineering Stem Cell Derived Biomimetic Vesicles for Versatility and Effective Targeted Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:2006169.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202006169

  122. 122.

    Liu R., Xie Y., Xu J.-R., Luo Q., Ren Y.-X., Chen M., Duan J.-L., Bao C.-J., Liu Y.-X., Li P.-S., et al. Engineered Stem Cell Biomimetic Liposomes Carrying Levamisole for Macrophage Immunity Reconstruction in Leukemia Therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;447:137582.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2022.137582

  123. 123.
  124. 124.

    Shin M.J., Park J.Y., Lee D.H., Khang D. Stem Cell Mimicking Nanoencapsulation for Targeting Arthritis. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021;16:8485-8507.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s334298

  125. 125.

    Xie Q., Liu Y., Long Y., Wang Z., Jiang S., Ahmed R., Daniyal M., Li B., Liu B., Wang W. Hybrid-Cell Membrane-Coated Nanocomplex-Loaded Chikusetsusaponin IVa Methyl Ester for a Combinational Therapy against Breast Cancer Assisted by Ce6. Biomater. Sci. 2021;9:2991-3004.

    Not in our library10.1039/d0bm02211j

  126. 126.

    He H., Guo C., Wang J., Korzun W.J., Wang X.-Y., Ghosh S., Yang H. Leutusome: A Biomimetic Nanoplatform Integrating Plasma Membrane Components of Leukocytes and Tumor Cells for Remarkably Enhanced Solid Tumor Homing. Nano Lett. 2018;18:6164-6174.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01892

  127. 127.

    Borys N., Dewhirst M.W. Drug Development of Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin: Combining Hyperthermia and Thermosensitive Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021;178:113985.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2021.113985

  128. 128.

    Abuwatfa W.H., Awad N.S., Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A. Thermosensitive Polymers and Thermo-Responsive Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems. Polymers. 2022;14:925.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym14050925

  129. 129.

    University of Oxford. PanDox: Feasibility of Enhanced Chemotherapy Delivery to Non-Resectable Primary Pancreatic Tumours Using Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin (ThermoDox®) and Focused Ultrasound. 2022.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    de Maar J.S., Suelmann B.B.M., Braat M.N.G.J.A., van Diest P.J., Vaessen H.H.B., Witkamp A.J., Linn S.C., Moonen C.T.W., van der Wall E., Deckers R. Phase I Feasibility Study of Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound-Induced Hyperthermia, Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in de Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients: Study Protocol of the i-GO Study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040162.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040162

  131. 131.

    EMA. Myocet Liposomal (Previously Myocet).

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    Harris L., Batist G., Belt R., Rovira D., Navari R., Azarnia N., Welles L., Winer E., TLC D-99 Study Group. Liposome-Encapsulated Doxorubicin Compared with Conventional Doxorubicin in a Randomized Multicenter Trial as First-Line Therapy of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94:25-36.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.10201

  133. 133.

    Batist G., Ramakrishnan G., Rao C.S., Chandrasekharan A., Gutheil J., Guthrie T., Shah P., Khojasteh A., Nair M.K., Hoelzer K., et al. Reduced Cardiotoxicity and Preserved Antitumor Efficacy of Liposome-Encapsulated Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Compared with Conventional Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in a Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Metastatic Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19:1444-1454.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1444

  134. 134.

    Strieth S., Dunau C., Michaelis U., Jäger L., Gellrich D., Wollenberg B., Dellian M. Phase I/II Clinical Study on Safety and Antivascular Effects of Paclitaxel Encapsulated in Cationic Liposomes for Targeted Therapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36:976-984.

    Not in our library10.1002/hed.23397

  135. 135.
  136. 136.

    Yang Y.-T., Shi Y., Jay M., Di Pasqua A.J. Enhanced Toxicity of Cisplatin with Chemosensitizer Phenethyl Isothiocyanate toward Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells When Delivered in Liposomal Nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014;27:946-948.

    Not in our library10.1021/tx5001128

  137. 137.
  138. 138.
  139. 139.

    Wei Y., Song S., Duan N., Wang F., Wang Y., Yang Y., Peng C., Li J., Nie D., Zhang X., et al. MT1-MMP-Activated Liposomes to Improve Tumor Blood Perfusion and Drug Delivery for Enhanced Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. Adv. Sci. 2020;7:1902746.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.201902746

  140. 140.

    Shen W., Liu T., Pei P., Li J., Yang S., Zhang Y., Zhou H., Hu L., Yang K. Metabolic Homeostasis-Regulated Nanoparticles for Antibody-Independent Cancer Radio-Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:e2207343.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202207343

  141. 141.

    Lai X., Liu X.L., Pan H., Zhu M.H., Long M., Yuan Y., Zhang Z., Dong X., Lu Q., Sun P., et al. Light-Triggered Efficient Sequential Drug Delivery of Biomimetic Nanosystem for Multimodal Chemo-, Antiangiogenic, and Anti-MDSC Therapy in Melanoma. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:e2106682.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202106682

  142. 142.

    Ahmed K.S., Hussein S.A., Ali A.H., Korma S.A., Lipeng Q., Jinghua C. Liposome: Composition, Characterisation, Preparation, and Recent Innovation in Clinical Applications. J. Drug Target. 2019;27:742-761.

    Not in our library10.1080/1061186x.2018.1527337

  143. 143.

    Allison A.C., Gregoriadis G. Liposomes as Immunological Adjuvants. Nature. 1974;252:252.

    Not in our library10.1038/252252a0

  144. 144.

    Tretiakova D.S., Vodovozova E.L. Liposomes as Adjuvants and Vaccine Delivery Systems. Biochem. Mosc. Suppl. Ser. Membr. Cell Biol. 2022;16:1-20.

    Not in our library10.1134/s1990747822020076

  145. 145.

    Grit M., Crommelin D.J. Chemical Stability of Liposomes: Implications for Their Physical Stability. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1993;64:3-18.

    Not in our library10.1016/0009-3084(93)90053-6

  146. 146.

    Pietzyk B., Henschke K. Degradation of Phosphatidylcholine in Liposomes Containing Carboplatin in Dependence on Composition and Storage Conditions. Int. J. Pharm. 2000;196:215-218.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00425-1

  147. 147.

    Yamauchi M., Tsutsumi K., Abe M., Uosaki Y., Nakakura M., Aoki N. Release of Drugs from Liposomes Varies with Particle Size. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007;30:963-966.

    Not in our library10.1248/bpb.30.963

  148. 148.

    du Plessis J., Ramachandran C., Weiner N., Müller D.G. The Influence of Lipid Composition and Lamellarity of Liposomes on the Physical Stability of Liposomes upon Storage. Int. J. Pharm. 1996;127:273-278.

    Not in our library10.1016/0378-5173(95)04281-4

  149. 149.

    Anderson M., Omri A. The Effect of Different Lipid Components on the in Vitro Stability and Release Kinetics of Liposome Formulations. Drug Deliv. 2004;11:33-39.

    Not in our library10.1080/10717540490265243

  150. 150.

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.