Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

A Review of the Common Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Therapeutic Approaches and the Potential Role of Nanotherapeutics

Richard N. L. Lamptey, Bivek Chaulagain, Riddhi Trivedi and 3 more

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijms23031851

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders are primarily characterized by neuron loss. The most common neurodegenerative disorders include Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Although there are several medicines currently approved for managing neurodegenerative disorders, a large majority of them only help with associated symptoms. This lack of pathogenesis-targeting therapies is primarily due to the restrictive effects of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which keeps close to 99% of all “foreign substances” out of the brain. Since their discovery, nanoparticles have been successfully used for targeted delivery into many organs, including the brain. This review briefly describes the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and their current management approaches. We then highlight the major challenges of brain-drug delivery, followed by the role of nanotherapeutics for the diagnosis and treatment of various neurological disorders.

References 146

  1. 1.

    Merelli A., Czornyj L., Lazarowski A. Erythropoietin: A neuroprotective agent in cerebral hypoxia, neurodegeneration, and epilepsy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013;19:6791-6801.

    Not in our library10.2174/1381612811319380011

  2. 2.

    Choonara Y.E., Pillay V., Du Toit L.C., Modi G., Naidoo D., Ndesendo V.M., Sibambo S.R. Trends in the molecular pathogenesis and clinical therapeutics of common neurodegenerative disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009;10:2510-2557.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms10062510

  3. 3.

    Rapp T., Chauvin P., Costa N., Molinier L. Health economic considerations in neurodegenerative disorders. Imaging Neurodegener. Disord. 2015;42.

    Not in our library10.1093/med/9780199671618.003.0004

  4. 4.

    Harilal S., Jose J., Parambi D.G.T., Kumar R., Mathew G.E., Uddin M.S., Kim H., Mathew B. Advancements in nanotherapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease: Current perspectives. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019;71:1370-1383.

    Not in our library10.1111/jphp.13132

  5. 5.

    Hinge N.S., Kathuria H., Pandey M.M. Engineering of structural and functional properties of nanotherapeutics and nanodiagnostics for intranasal brain targeting in Alzheimer’s. Appl. Mater. Today. 2022;26:101303.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101303

  6. 6.

    Montazersaheb S., Ahmadian E., Maleki Dizaj S., Jahanbani Y., Davaran S., Huseynova I., Zhdanov R., Keskin C., Khalilov R., Eftekhari A. Emerging Nanotherapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research-Dementia. 2021;2:173.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Brain Basics: The Life and Death of a Neuron. 2002.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Van den Heuvel M.P., Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013;17:683-696.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012

  9. 9.

    Kempermann G. Adult Neurogenesis: Stem Cells and Neuronal Development in the Adult Brain. 2006.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Pino A., Fumagalli G., Bifari F., Decimo I. New neurons in adult brain: Distribution, molecular mechanisms and therapies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017;141:4-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.003

  11. 11.

    Ganat Y.M., Silbereis J., Cave C., Ngu H., Anderson G.M., Ohkubo Y., Ment L.R., Vaccarino F.M. Early postnatal astroglial cells produce multilineage precursors and neural stem cells in vivo. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:8609-8621.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2532-06.2006

  12. 12.

    Przedborski S., Vila M., Jackson-Lewis V. Series Introduction: Neurodegeneration: What is it and where are we? J. Clin. Investig. 2003;111:3-10.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci200317522

  13. 13.

    Hoover B.R., Reed M.N., Su J., Penrod R.D., Kotilinek L.A., Grant M.K., Pitstick R., Carlson G.A., Lanier L.M., Yuan L.-L. Tau mislocalization to dendritic spines mediates synaptic dysfunction independently of neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2010;68:1067-1081.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.030

  14. 14.

    Milnerwood A.J., Raymond L.A. Early synaptic pathophysiology in neurodegeneration: Insights from Huntington’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:513-523.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tins.2010.08.002

  15. 15.

    Scott D.A., Tabarean I., Tang Y., Cartier A., Masliah E., Roy S. A pathologic cascade leading to synaptic dysfunction in α-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:8083-8095.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1091-10.2010

  16. 16.

    Kovacs G.G. Molecular pathology of neurodegenerative diseases: Principles and practice. J. Clin. Pathol. 2019;72:725-735.

    Not in our library10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205952

  17. 17.

    Martin J.B. Molecular basis of the neurodegenerative disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;340:1970-1980.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199906243402507

  18. 18.

    Mattson M.P. Apoptosis in neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:120-130.

    Not in our library10.1038/35040009

  19. 19.

    Hague S., Klaffke S., Bandmann O. Neurodegenerative disorders: Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2005;76:1058-1063.

    Not in our library10.1136/jnnp.2004.060186

  20. 20.

    Harding B.N., Kariya S., Monani U.R., Chung W.K., Benton M., Yum S.W., Tennekoon G., Finkel R.S. Spectrum of neuropathophysiology in spinal muscular atrophy type I. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2015;74:15-24.

    Not in our library10.1097/nen.0000000000000144

  21. 21.

    Klockgether T., Mariotti C., Paulson H.L. Spinocerebellar ataxia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5:1-21.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41572-019-0074-3

  22. 22.

    Liu H., Hu Y., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Gao S., Wang L., Wang T., Han Z., Sun B.L., Liu G. Mendelian randomization highlights significant difference and genetic heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease GWAS and self-report proxy phenotype GWAX. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2022;14:17.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13195-022-00963-3

  23. 23.

    Jain N., Chen-Plotkin A.S. Genetic modifiers in neurodegeneration. Curr. Genet. Med. Rep. 2018;6:11-19.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40142-018-0133-1

  24. 24.

    Jain V., Baitharu I., Barhwal K., Prasad D., Singh S.B., Ilavazhagan G.J.C. Enriched environment prevents hypobaric hypoxia induced neurodegeneration and is independent of antioxidant signaling. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012;32:599-611.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10571-012-9807-5

  25. 25.

    Esch T., Stefano G.B., Fricchione G.L., Benson H.J.N.L. The role of stress in neurodegenerative diseases and mental disorders. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2002;23:199-208.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Allan S.M., Rothwell N.J. Inflammation in central nervous system injury. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003;358:1669-1677.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2003.1358

  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    Brouwer-DudokdeWit A.C., Savenije A., Zoeteweij M.W., Maat-Kievit A., Tibben A. A hereditary disorder in the family and the family life cycle: Huntington disease as a paradigm. Fam. Process. 2002;41:677-692.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00677.x

  29. 29.

    Bayer T.A., Wirths O. Intracellular accumulation of amyloid-Beta-a predictor for synaptic dysfunction and neuron loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2010;2:8.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnagi.2010.00008

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Butterfield D.A., Griffin S., Munch G., Pasinetti G.M. Amyloid β-peptide and amyloid pathology are central to the oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades under which Alzheimer’s disease brain exists. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2002;4:193-201.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-2002-4309

  32. 32.

    Paula V.d.J.R.d., Guimarães F.M., Diniz B.S., Forlenza O.V. Neurobiological pathways to Alzheimer’s disease: Amyloid-beta, TAU protein or both? Dement. Neuropsychol. 2009;3:188-194.

    Not in our library10.1590/s1980-57642009dn30300003

  33. 33.

    Mondragón-Rodríguez S., Perry G., Zhu X., Boehm J. Amyloid Beta and tau proteins as therapeutic targets for Alzheimer’s disease treatment: Rethinking the current strategy. Int. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012;2012:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/630182

  34. 34.

    Spires-Jones T.L., Hyman B.T. The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2014;82:756-771.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004

  35. 35.

    Akhondzadeh S., Noroozian M. Alzheimer’s disease: Pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. IDrugs Investig. Drugs J. 2002;5:1062-1069.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Kouli A., Torsney K.M., Kuan W.-L. Parkinson’s disease: Etiology, neuropathology, and pathogenesis. Exon Publ. 2018;3-26.

    Not in our library10.15586/codonpublications.parkinsondisease.2018.ch1

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Priyadarshi A., Khuder S.A., Schaub E.A., Priyadarshi S.S. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: A metaanalysis. Environ. Res. 2001;86:122-127.

    Not in our library10.1006/enrs.2001.4264

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Gorell J.M., Peterson E.L., Rybicki B.A., Johnson C.C. Multiple risk factors for Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2004;217:169-174.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jns.2003.09.014

  41. 41.

    Kuopio A.M., Marttila R.J., Helenius H., Rinne U.K. Environmental risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 1999;14:928-939.

    Not in our library10.1002/1531-8257(199911)14:6<928::aid-mds1004>3.0.co;2-z

  42. 42.

    Bartels A.L., Leenders K.L. Parkinson’s disease: The syndrome, the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Cortex. 2009;45:915-921.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.010

  43. 43.

    Chaudhuri K.R., Schapira A.H. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: Dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:464-474.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70068-7

  44. 44.

    Moore D.J., West A.B., Dawson V.L., Dawson T.M. Molecular pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;28:57-87.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135718

  45. 45.

    Schulz-Schaeffer W.J. The synaptic pathology of α-synuclein aggregation in dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120:131-143.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00401-010-0711-0

  46. 46.
  47. 47.

    Morris J. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and related motor neuron diseases: An overview. Neurodiagn. J. 2015;55:180-194.

    Not in our library10.1080/21646821.2015.1075181

  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Hardiman O., Al-Chalabi A., Chio A., Corr E.M., Logroscino G., Robberecht W., Shaw P.J., Simmons Z., Van Den Berg L.H. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:1-19.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrdp.2017.71

  50. 50.

    Rossi F.H., Franco M.C., Estevez A.G. Pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Current Advances in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2013.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    Dunn B., Stein P., Cavazzoni P. Approval of Aducanumab for Alzheimer Disease—The FDA’s Perspective. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021;181:1276-1278.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4607

  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    Wu K.-M., Zhang Y.-R., Huang Y.-Y., Dong Q., Tan L., Yu J.-T. The role of the immune system in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;70:101409.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2021.101409

  55. 55.

    Hampel H., Mesulam M.-M., Cuello A.C., Khachaturian A.S., Vergallo A., Farlow M., Snyder P., Giacobini E., Khachaturian Z. Revisiting the cholinergic hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease: Emerging evidence from translational and clinical research. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;6:2-15.

    Not in our library10.14283/jpad.2018.43

  56. 56.

    Deardorff W.J., Feen E., Grossberg G.T. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors across all stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging. 2015;32:537-547.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40266-015-0273-x

  57. 57.
  58. 58.

    Johnson J.W., Kotermanski S.E. Mechanism of action of memantine. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006;6:61-67.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coph.2005.09.007

  59. 59.

    Reisberg B., Doody R., Stöffler A., Schmitt F., Ferris S., Möbius H. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1333-1341.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa013128

  60. 60.

    Folch J., Busquets O., Ettcheto M., Sánchez-López E., Castro-Torres R.D., Verdaguer E., Garcia M.L., Olloquequi J., Casadesús G., Beas-Zarate C. Memantine for the treatment of dementia: A review on its current and future applications. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;62:1223-1240.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-170672

  61. 61.

    Alexander G.C., Knopman D.S., Emerson S.S., Ovbiagele B., Kryscio R.J., Perlmutter J.S., Kesselheim A.S. Revisiting FDA Approval of Aducanumab. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:769-771.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmp2110468

  62. 62.

    Armstrong M.J., Okun M.S. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA. 2020;323:548-560.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2019.22360

  63. 63.

    Bucchia M., Ramirez A., Parente V., Simone C., Nizzardo M., Magri F., Dametti S., Corti S. Therapeutic development in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin. Ther. 2015;37:668-680.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.12.020

  64. 64.

    Jaiswal M.K. Riluzole and edaravone: A tale of two amyotrophic lateral sclerosis drugs. Med. Res. Rev. 2019;39:733-748.

    Not in our library10.1002/med.21528

  65. 65.

    Ballabh P., Braun A., Nedergaard M. The blood–brain barrier: An overview: Structure, regulation, and clinical implications. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004;16:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.016

  66. 66.

    Daneman R., Prat A. The blood–brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015;7:a020412.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a020412

  67. 67.

    Felgenhauer K. Protein size and cerebrospinal fluid composition. Klin. Wochenschr. 1974;52:1158-1164.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01466734

  68. 68.

    Greene C., Campbell M. Tight junction modulation of the blood brain barrier: CNS delivery of small molecules. Tissue Barriers. 2016;4:e1138017.

    Not in our library10.1080/21688370.2015.1138017

  69. 69.

    Hawkins B.T., Davis T.P. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005;57:173-185.

    Not in our library10.1124/pr.57.2.4

  70. 70.

    Nakagawa S., Deli M.A., Kawaguchi H., Shimizudani T., Shimono T., Kittel A., Tanaka K., Niwa M. A new blood–brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem. Int. 2009;54:253-263.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuint.2008.12.002

  71. 71.

    Serlin Y., Shelef I., Knyazer B., Friedman A. Anatomy and physiology of the blood–brain barrier. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2015;2-6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.01.002

  72. 72.

    Begley D.J. ABC transporters and the blood-brain barrier. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004;10:1295-1312.

    Not in our library10.2174/1381612043384844

  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    Lockman P., Mumper R., Khan M., Allen D. Nanoparticle technology for drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2002;28:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1081/ddc-120001481

  75. 75.

    Van de Waterbeemd H., Camenisch G., Folkers G., Chretien J.R., Raevsky O.A. Estimation of blood-brain barrier crossing of drugs using molecular size and shape, and H-bonding descriptors. J. Drug Target. 1998;6:151-165.

    Not in our library10.3109/10611869808997889

  76. 76.

    Di L., Artursson P., Avdeef A., Ecker G.F., Faller B., Fischer H., Houston J.B., Kansy M., Kerns E.H., Krämer S.D. Evidence-based approach to assess passive diffusion and carrier-mediated drug transport. Drug Discov. Today. 2012;17:905-912.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drudis.2012.03.015

  77. 77.

    Fischer H., Gottschlich R., Seelig A. Blood-brain barrier permeation: Molecular parameters governing passive diffusion. J. Membr. Biol. 1998;165:201-211.

    Not in our library10.1007/s002329900434

  78. 78.

    Arora S., Sharma D., Singh J. GLUT-1: An effective target to deliver brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene across the blood brain barrier. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1620-1633.

    Not in our library10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00076

  79. 79.

    Lee H., Pienaar I.S. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier in Parkinson’s disease: Curse or route to a cure. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed. 2014;19:272-280.

    Not in our library10.2741/4206

  80. 80.

    Kook S.-Y., Seok Hong H., Moon M., Mook-Jung I. Disruption of blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Tissue Barriers. 2013;1:8845-8854.

    Not in our library10.4161/tisb.23993

  81. 81.

    Argaw A.T., Asp L., Zhang J., Navrazhina K., Pham T., Mariani J.N., Mahase S., Dutta D.J., Seto J., Kramer E.G. Astrocyte-derived VEGF-A drives blood-brain barrier disruption in CNS inflammatory disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2012;122:2454-2468.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci60842

  82. 82.

    Sengillo J.D., Winkler E.A., Walker C.T., Sullivan J.S., Johnson M., Zlokovic B.V. Deficiency in Mural Vascular Cells Coincides with Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in A lzheimer’s Disease. Brain Pathol. 2013;23:303-310.

    Not in our library10.1111/bpa.12004

  83. 83.

    Dong X. Current Strategies for Brain Drug Delivery. Theranostics. 2018;8:1481-1493.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.21254

  84. 84.

    Ghuman J., Zunszain P.A., Petitpas I., Bhattacharya A.A., Otagiri M., Curry S. Structural basis of the drug-binding specificity of human serum albumin. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;353:38-52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.075

  85. 85.

    Krol S. Challenges in drug delivery to the brain: Nature is against us. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2012;164:145-155.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.044

  86. 86.

    Pardridge W.M. Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1959-1972.

    Not in our library10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126

  87. 87.

    Teleanu D.M., Negut I., Grumezescu V., Grumezescu A.M., Teleanu R.I. Nanomaterials for drug delivery to the central nervous system. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:371.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano9030371

  88. 88.

    Poovaiah N., Davoudi Z., Peng H., Schlichtmann B., Mallapragada S., Narasimhan B., Wang Q. Treatment of neurodegenerative disorders through the blood–brain barrier using nanocarriers. Nanoscale. 2018;10:16962-16983.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8nr04073g

  89. 89.

    Chauhan P.S., Yadav D., Koul B., Mohanta Y.K., Jin J.O. Recent Advances in Nanotechnology: A Novel Therapeutic System for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Drug Metab. 2020;21:1144-1151.

    Not in our library10.2174/1389200221666201124140518

  90. 90.

    Spuch C., Saida O., Navarro C. Advances in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders employing nanoparticles. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2012;6:2-18.

    Not in our library10.2174/187221112799219125

  91. 91.

    Modi G., Pillay V., Choonara Y.E. Advances in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders employing nanotechnology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010;1184:154-172.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05108.x

  92. 92.

    Mignani S., Bryszewska M., Zablocka M., Klajnert-Maculewicz B., Cladera J., Shcharbin D., Majoral J.-P. Can dendrimer based nanoparticles fight neurodegenerative diseases? Current situation versus other established approaches. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017;64:23-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.09.006

  93. 93.

    Dos Santos Rodrigues B., Lakkadwala S., Kanekiyo T., Singh J. Dual-modified liposome for targeted and enhanced gene delivery into mice brain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2020;374:354-365.

    Not in our library10.1124/jpet.119.264127

  94. 94.

    Dos Santos Rodrigues B., Arora S., Kanekiyo T., Singh J. Efficient neuronal targeting and transfection using RVG and transferrin-conjugated liposomes. Brain Res. 2020;1734:146738.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146738

  95. 95.

    Sharma G., Modgil A., Layek B., Arora K., Sun C., Law B., Singh J. Cell penetrating peptide tethered bi-ligand liposomes for delivery to brain in vivo: Biodistribution and transfection. J. Control. Release. 2013;167:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.016

  96. 96.

    Cano A., Sánchez-López E., Ettcheto M., López-Machado A., Espina M., Souto E.B., Galindo R., Camins A., García M.L., Turowski P. Current advances in the development of novel polymeric nanoparticles for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Nanomedicine. 2020;15:1239-1261.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2019-0443

  97. 97.

    Fatima S., Quadri S.N., Parveen S., Beg S., Barkat M.A., Samim M., Abdin M., Ahmad F.J. Nanomedicinal Strategies as Emerging Therapeutic Avenues to Treat and Manage Cerebral Ischemia. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2021;20:125-144.

    Not in our library10.2174/1871527319666201102100330

  98. 98.

    Vissers C., Ming G.L., Song H. Nanoparticle technology and stem cell therapy team up against neurodegenerative disorders. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019;148:239-251.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2019.02.007

  99. 99.

    Salih N.A. The enhancement of breast cancer radiotherapy by using silver nanoparticles with 6 MeV gamma photons. Synthesis. 2013;26:10-15.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Curry T., Kopelman R., Shilo M., Popovtzer R. Multifunctional theranostic gold nanoparticles for targeted CT imaging and photothermal therapy. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2014;9:53-61.

    Not in our library10.1002/cmmi.1563

  101. 101.
  102. 102.

    Kim T., Lee N., Arifin D.R., Shats I., Janowski M., Walczak P., Hyeon T., Bulte J.W.M. In Vivo Micro-CT Imaging of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Labeled with Gold-Poly-L-Lysine Nanocomplexes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;27:1604213.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201604213

  103. 103.

    Jara-Guajardo P., Cabrera P., Celis F., Soler M., Berlanga I., Parra-Muñoz N., Acosta G., Albericio F., Guzman F., Campos M. Gold nanoparticles mediate improved detection of β-amyloid aggregates by fluorescence. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:690.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano10040690

  104. 104.

    Martins P.A.T., Alsaiari S., Julfakyan K., Nie Z., Khashab N.M. Self-assembled lipoprotein based gold nanoparticles for detection and photothermal disaggregation of β-amyloid aggregates. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:2102-2105.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6cc09085k

  105. 105.

    Masoudi Asil S., Ahlawat J., Guillama Barroso G., Narayan M. Nanomaterial based drug delivery systems for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Biomater. Sci. 2020;8:4109-4128.

    Not in our library10.1039/d0bm00809e

  106. 106.

    Locatelli E., Naddaka M., Uboldi C., Loudos G., Fragogeorgi E., Molinari V., Pucci A., Tsotakos T., Psimadas D., Ponti J. Targeted delivery of silver nanoparticles and alisertib: In vitro and in vivo synergistic effect against glioblastoma. Nanomedicine. 2014;9:839-849.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm.14.1

  107. 107.

    Wei M., Li S., Yang Z., Zheng W., Le W. Gold nanoparticles enhance the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into dopaminergic neurons via mTOR/p70S6K pathway. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1305-1317.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2017-0001

  108. 108.

    Aliev G., Daza J., Solís Herrera A., del Carmen Arias Esparza M., Morales L., Echeverria V., Bachurin S.O., Barreto G.E. Nanoparticles as Alternative Strategies for Drug Delivery to the Alzheimer Brain: Electron Microscopy Ultrastructural Analysis. CNS Neurol. Disord.-Drug Targets Former. Curr. Drug Targets-CNS Neurol. Disord. 2015;14:1235-1242.

    Not in our library10.2174/1871527314666150821102631

  109. 109.

    Huang C.L., Hsiao I.L., Lin H.C., Wang C.F., Huang Y.J., Chuang C.Y. Silver nanoparticles affect on gene expression of inflammatory and neurodegenerative responses in mouse brain neural cells. Environ. Res. 2015;136:253-263.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2014.11.006

  110. 110.

    Rajendran K., Anwar A., Khan N.A., Siddiqui R. Brain-eating amoebae: Silver nanoparticle conjugation enhanced efficacy of anti-amoebic drugs against Naegleria fowleri. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017;8:2626-2630.

    Not in our library10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00430

  111. 111.

    Gonzalez-Carter D.A., Leo B.F., Ruenraroengsak P., Chen S., Goode A.E., Theodorou I.G., Chung K.F., Carzaniga R., Shaffer M.S., Dexter D.T., et al. Silver nanoparticles reduce brain inflammation and related neurotoxicity through induction of H(2)S-synthesizing enzymes. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42871.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep42871

  112. 112.

    Skalska J., Strużyńska L. Toxic effects of silver nanoparticles in mammals—Does a risk of neurotoxicity exist? Folia Neuropathol. 2015;53:281-300.

    Not in our library10.5114/fn.2015.56543

  113. 113.

    Bony B.A., Kievit F.M. A Role for Nanoparticles in Treating Traumatic Brain Injury. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:473.

    Not in our library10.3390/pharmaceutics11090473

  114. 114.

    Tang J., Xiong L., Wang S., Wang J., Liu L., Li J., Yuan F., Xi T. Distribution, translocation and accumulation of silver nanoparticles in rats. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009;9:4924-4932.

    Not in our library10.1166/jnn.2009.1269

  115. 115.

    Arya A., Gangwar A., Singh S.K., Roy M., Das M., Sethy N.K., Bhargava K. Cerium oxide nanoparticles promote neurogenesis and abrogate hypoxia-induced memory impairment through AMPK-PKC-CBP signaling cascade. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016;11:1159.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s102096

  116. 116.

    Pinzón-Daza M.L., Campia I., Kopecka J., Garzón R., Ghigo D., Riganti C. Nanoparticle- and liposome-carried drugs: New strategies for active targeting and drug delivery across blood-brain barrier. Curr. Drug Metab. 2013;14:625-640.

    Not in our library10.2174/1389200211314060001

  117. 117.

    Naz S., Beach J., Heckert B., Tummala T., Pashchenko O., Banerjee T., Santra S. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: A ‘radical’ approach to neurodegenerative disease treatment. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:545-553.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2016-0399

  118. 118.

    Zavvari F., Nahavandi A., Shahbazi A. Neuroprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on experimental stress-induced depression in male rats. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2020;106:101799.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchemneu.2020.101799

  119. 119.

    Wu M.-R., Lee C.-H., Hsiao J.-K. Bidirectional enhancement of cell proliferation between iron oxide nanoparticle-labeled mesenchymal stem cells and choroid plexus in a cell-based therapy model of ischemic stroke. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020;15:9181.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s278687

  120. 120.

    Balducci C., Mancini S.A.-O., Minniti S., La Vitola P.A.-O., Zotti M., Sancini G., Mauri M., Cagnotto A., Colombo L.A.-O., Fiordaliso F., et al. Multifunctional liposomes reduce brain β-amyloid burden and ameliorate memory impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:14022-14031.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0284-14.2014

  121. 121.

    Arora S., Layek B., Singh J. Design and validation of liposomal ApoE2 gene delivery system to evade blood–brain barrier for effective treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Pharm. 2020;18:714-725.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00461

  122. 122.

    Arora S., Singh J. In vitro and in vivo optimization of liposomal nanoparticles based brain targeted vgf gene therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;608:121095.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121095

  123. 123.

    Zhou H., S Beevers C., Huang S. The targets of curcumin. Curr. Drug Targets. 2011;12:332-347.

    Not in our library10.2174/138945011794815356

  124. 124.

    Yanagisawa D., Amatsubo T., Morikawa S., Taguchi H., Urushitani M., Shirai N., Hirao K., Shiino A., Inubushi T., Tooyama I. In vivo detection of amyloid β deposition using ¹⁹F magnetic resonance imaging with a ¹⁹F-containing curcumin derivative in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 2011;184:120-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.071

  125. 125.

    Lee I., Yang J., Lee J.H., Choe Y.S. Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(4-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-7-(4’-methyl)curcumin with improved brain permeability for β-amyloid plaque imaging. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;21:5765-5769.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.08.003

  126. 126.

    Bhatt R., Singh D., Prakash A., Mishra N. Development, characterization and nasal delivery of rosmarinic acid-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for the effective management of Huntington’s disease. Drug Deliv. 2015;22:931-939.

    Not in our library10.3109/10717544.2014.880860

  127. 127.

    Sharma D., Singh J. Long-term glycemic control and prevention of diabetes complications in vivo using oleic acid-grafted-chitosan-zinc-insulin complexes incorporated in thermosensitive copolymer. J. Control. Release. 2020;323:161-178.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.012

  128. 128.

    Baba M., Itaka K., Kondo K., Yamasoba T., Kataoka K. Treatment of neurological disorders by introducing mRNA in vivo using polyplex nanomicelles. J. Control. Release. 2015;201:41-48.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.017

  129. 129.

    Arora S., Trivedi R., Lamptey R.N., Chaulagain B., Layek B., Singh J. Smart biopolymers for controlled drug delivery applications. Tailor-Made and Functionalized Biopolymer Systems. 2021;53-83.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    Kim J.-Y., Choi W.I., Kim Y.H., Tae G. Brain-targeted delivery of protein using chitosan-and RVG peptide-conjugated, pluronic-based nano-carrier. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1170-1178.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.047

  131. 131.

    Layek B., Singh J. Amino acid grafted chitosan for high performance gene delivery: Comparison of amino acid hydrophobicity on vector and polyplex characteristics. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:485-494.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm301720g

  132. 132.

    Xue Y., Wang N., Zeng Z., Huang J., Xiang Z., Guan Y.-Q. Neuroprotective effect of chitosan nanoparticle gene delivery system grafted with acteoside (ACT) in Parkinson’s disease models. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020;43:197-207.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmst.2019.10.013

  133. 133.

    Jaruszewski K.M., Ramakrishnan S., Poduslo J.F., Kandimalla K.K. Chitosan enhances the stability and targeting of immuno-nanovehicles to cerebro-vascular deposits of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid protein. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012;8:250-260.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2011.06.008

  134. 134.

    Cai Q., Wang L., Deng G., Liu J., Chen Q., Chen Z. Systemic delivery to central nervous system by engineered PLGA nanoparticles. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016;8:749.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    Bhatt P.C., Verma A., Al-Abbasi F.A., Anwar F., Kumar V., Panda B.P. Development of surface-engineered PLGA nanoparticulate-delivery system of Tet1-conjugated nattokinase enzyme for inhibition of Aβ(40) plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017;12:8749.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s144545

  136. 136.

    Carradori D., Balducci C., Re F., Brambilla D., Le Droumaguet B., Flores O., Gaudin A., Mura S., Forloni G., Ordoñez-Gutierrez L., et al. Antibody-functionalized polymer nanoparticle leading to memory recovery in Alzheimer’s disease-like transgenic mouse model. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2018;14:609-618.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2017.12.006

  137. 137.

    Saffari P.M., Alijanpour S., Takzaree N., Sahebgharani M., Etemad-Moghadam S., Noorbakhsh F., Partoazar A. Metformin loaded phosphatidylserine nanoliposomes improve memory deficit and reduce neuroinflammation in streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer’s disease model. Life Sci. 2020;255:117861.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117861

  138. 138.

    Amini S., Saudi A., Amirpour N., Jahromi M., Najafabadi S.S., Kazemi M., Rafienia M., Salehi H. Application of electrospun polycaprolactone fibers embedding lignin nanoparticle for peripheral nerve regeneration: In vitro and in vivo study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;159:154-173.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.073

  139. 139.

    Mili B., Das K., Kumar A., Saxena A., Singh P., Ghosh S., Bag S. Preparation of NGF encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles and its evaluation on neuronal differentiation potentiality of canine mesenchymal stem cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2018;29:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-017-6008-2

  140. 140.

    Zielińska A., Costa B., Ferreira M.V., Miguéis D., Louros J., Durazzo A., Lucarini M., Eder P., V Chaud M., Morsink M. Nanotoxicology and nanosafety: Safety-by-design and testing at a glance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4657.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph17134657

  141. 141.

    Hofmann-Amtenbrink M., Hofmann H., Hool A., Roubert F. Nanotechnology in medicine: European research and its implications. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2014;144:w14044.

    Not in our library10.4414/smw.2014.14044

  142. 142.

    Suk J.S., Xu Q., Kim N., Hanes J., Ensign L.M. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;99:28-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012

  143. 143.

    Neves A., van der Putten L., Queiroz J., Pinheiro M., Reis S. Transferrin-functionalized lipid nanoparticles for curcumin brain delivery. J. Biotechnol. 2021;331:108-117.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.03.010

  144. 144.

    Ji X., Lu W., Wu K., Cho W.C. Influencing Factors of the Pharmacokinetic Characters on Nanopharmaceutics. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2017;5:24-31.

    Not in our library10.2174/2211738505666161214142755

  145. 145.

    Souto E.B., Silva G.F., Dias-Ferreira J., Zielinska A., Ventura F., Durazzo A., Lucarini M., Novellino E., Santini A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production scales and clinically compliant production methods. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:455.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano10030455

  146. 146.

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.