Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Leaky Gut: Effect of Dietary Fiber and Fats on Microbiome and Intestinal Barrier

Haruki Usuda, Takayuki Okamoto, Koichiro Wada

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijms22147613

Abstract

Intestinal tract is the boundary that prevents harmful molecules from invading into the mucosal tissue, followed by systemic circulation. Intestinal permeability is an index for intestinal barrier integrity. Intestinal permeability has been shown to increase in various diseases—not only intestinal inflammatory diseases, but also systemic diseases, including diabetes, chronic kidney dysfunction, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. Chronic increase of intestinal permeability is termed ‘leaky gut’ which is observed in the patients and animal models of these diseases. This state often correlates with the disease state. In addition, recent studies have revealed that gut microbiota affects intestinal and systemic heath conditions via their metabolite, especially short-chain fatty acids and lipopolysaccharides, which can trigger leaky gut. The etiology of leaky gut is still unknown; however, recent studies have uncovered exogenous factors that can modulate intestinal permeability. Nutrients are closely related to intestinal health and permeability that are actively investigated as a hot topic of scientific research. Here, we will review the effect of nutrients on intestinal permeability and microbiome for a better understanding of leaky gut and a possible mechanism of increase in intestinal permeability.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Leaky gut refers to the dysfunction of the intestinal barrier and often leads to the generation of leaky gut syndrome (LGS) under chronic states. As the name indicates, the pathological manifestation of leaky gut is increased intestinal permeability, which is induced by various causative factors. The term ‘intestinal permeability’ is simple; however, the definition of intestinal permeability is ambiguous, since it potentially has two meanings—epithelium permeability and permeability of capillary vessels in villi. It is difficult to evaluate the latter in vivo. So, the term ‘leaky gut’ is used to indicate abnormal translocation of big-size molecules from lumen to villi or excessive absorption of such molecules from lumen into systemic circulation, which, in turn, induces various organ disorders. Historically, the concept of leaky gut began to emerge as epithelium permeability. Classical LGS has been observed concomitantly with gut inflammation, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or coeliac disease, and NSAIDs-induced ulceration that was studied from 1970 to 1990 extensively. Hence, leaky gut was recognized as a typical manifestation of gut inflammation during this period and ceased to be focused on. Leaky gut has again come under the scientific spotlight due to the attention gained by the gut microbiome. Genome-sequencing methods have dramatically evolved within the last two decades, which now enables analysis of the whole intestinal bacterial genome, or identification of bacteria in stool sample by sequencing conserved marker genes such as the 16srRNA gene of bacteria. Now we know the entire genetic content of human gut microbiota, the amount of which is calculated to be 100-fold or higher compared to human genomic content. These findings have led to the emergence of the concept of intestinal enterotypes. Two major phyla, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, dominate among the microbiota of humans, and many studies have shown the considerable inter- and intrapersonal variability at the genus level and above. Firmicutes phylum contains various types of bacteria including facultative, anaerobic, cocci, and bacilli bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria are major in this phylum and have relatively low guanine and cytosine contents. On the contrary to Firmicutes, gram-negative bacteria are dominant in Bacteroidetes phylum and human gut have Bacteroides, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Prevotella genus primarily. Bacteria interacts with a host directly or indirectly via physiological active molecules secreted from bacteria including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), p-cresol, p-cresyl-glucuronide (pCG), indoxyl sulphate (IS), indole-3 acetic acid (IAA), and H2S and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) that may result in protective or harmful effects on the intestinal barrier and various organs distant from the intestine including the liver, kidney, and brain. In fact, dysbiosis, an unhealthy alternation of gut microbiota, correlates with several types of diseases, including IBD, cancer, neuropsychiatric disorders, chronic kidney diseases (CKD), and cardiometabolic diseases including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cardiovascular disease, along with increased intestinal permeability. Dysbiosis results in an increased population of pathogenic bacteria which are likely to produce higher levels of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and induce damage to epithelial cells which is one of the possible mechanisms of increased intestinal permeability observed with dysbiosis. Furthermore, disruptions of intercellular connections let harmful molecules, including LPS, invade the intestinal tissue, and consequently access the blood stream, which provokes or worsens not only IBD but also systemic diseases. Hence, the concept of LGS shifted from a mere inflammatory phenotype to an exacerbation factor of systemic diseases, although its etiology is still unclear. In addition, bidirectional translocation of molecules, metabolites, and toxins derived from systemic circulation to gut lumen also can be recognized as LGS although the evidence is poor.

Dietary components come into contact with intestinal lumen for a long time and are likely to regulate gut microbiota and intestinal permeability. However, many studies which are now focusing on gut microbiota recognize alteration of intestinal permeability as an ancillary symptom. In this review, we provide an overview of recent studies that investigate the effect of dietary components on intestinal permeability and microbiome and hypothesize a possible correlation among them (Figure 1). Especially, the effects of dietary fiber and a high fat diet (HFD) on microbiome and intestinal permeability have been attracting attention globally as targets of research and are investigated most actively. Hence, we will focus on these nutrients.

2. Intestinal Barrier

Luminal components including unstirred water, glycocalyx, and mucus as well as antibacterial molecules including defensins, lysosome, and IgA provide the first line of defense before harmful bacteria come in contact with the epithelium. In addition, microclimate and secretions from the stomach, pancreas, and pancreatic acids destroy bacteria and antigens in the lumen.

Mucus layers and epithelium are the most important and major structures of intestinal barrier. A mucus layer exists on the outer surface of the large intestine. This layer is composed of two sub-layers. The outer layer is thick and loose, where bacteria and bacteria-derived molecules are abundant. Many species of commensal bacteria grow and form colonies on the outer layer, such that under healthy conditions, pathogenic bacteria cannot overgrow or invade this territory of commensal bacteria. The inner layer is firm, adherent, and harbors quite small numbers of bacteria. This layer acts as a boundary between bacteria and epithelium. In the case of the small intestine, the mucus layer is single and fluid and contains abundant antimicrobial substances. Studies using experimental animals have shown that the disruption of mucus production can lead to intestinal damage and inflammation.

The epithelium is located just below inner layers and is composed of normal epithelial cells and several types of cells possessing specific functions, including Paneth cells, goblet cells, etc. Paneth cells secrete antibacterial peptides such as lysozyme and defensins and prevent colonization of harmful bacteria, while enterocytes produce chloride in response to noxious stimuli. Goblet cells contribute to maintaining a mucosal layer by secreting mucin. Epithelial cells are linked by the apical junctional complex which consists of the tight junction (TJ) and adherence junction. TJ is further composed of claudin, occludin, and junctional adhesion protein molecule-A (JAM-A) as well as intracellular plaque proteins such as zonula occludens (ZOs) and cingulin (Figure 2). Twenty-seven human claudin genes have been identified, though the protein expression of some of them is not confirmed. Of note, claudin-13 is expressed in rodents but is absent in humans. Claudin and occludin function cooperatively. Nevertheless, embryonic stem cells that lack occludin differentiate into polarized epithelia with functional TJ. In addition, occludin knockout leads to the normal barrier function of intestinal epithelium. Thus, occluding plays a supportive role in intestinal permeability.

Molecules can pass through the epithelium passively via transcellular route or paracellular route (Figure 3). Soluble lipids, small hydrophilic compounds, ions, and water molecules pass through the transcellular route. The paracellular route allows the passage of bigger molecules, although the size is limited at up to 600 Da in in vivo and 10 kDa in in vitro via apical junctional complex. The latter route is further divided into two types of pathways and regulated by IL-13 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). IL-13 specifically increases flux across the small molecules, including ions and water, through the pore pathway. IL-13 causes barrier loss by inducing claudin-2 expression as well as by increasing apoptosis and inhibiting wound healing both in vitro and in vivo, whereas lower doses of IL-13 induce claudin-2 upregulation and claudin-2-dependent pore-pathway activation in response to IL-13 exposure without increase in leaks or unrestricted pathway flux. TNF opens the leak pathway via myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and lets bigger molecules pass through the intracellular space. Hence, the leak pathway is likely to be associated with inflammation, which would permit the passage of macromolecules, bacterial products, and food antigens. TNFα has also been shown to regulate TJ and the clinically relevant role of TNF in IBD pathogenesis is clearly demonstrated by the efficacy of anti-TNF antibodies in IBD, which reduces disease severity and restores intestinal barrier function. Restoration of epithelial barrier function by anti-TNF therapy may reflect mucosal healing in the setting of a dampened immune system; however, pre-clinical studies have shown that TNF signaling also modulates TJ. Many studies have shown decreased levels of intestinal TJ-consisting proteins in animal models of IBD, obesity, and T2D, with increased permeability, suggesting that a leaky pathway is responsible for LGS.

Epithelial cells bind each other with tight junction, adherens junction, and desmosome. Tight junction consists of claudin, occluding, and junctional adhesion protein molecule-A (JAM) recognized as a key construction which regulate the absorption of molecules via the paracellular route. These molecules, associated with zonula occluden-1 (ZO-1), which contribute to the formation of tight junction as a scaffold protein. Myosin-actin complex which is associated with myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK) is also interacting with ZO-1 in a steady state. Adherens junction is comprised by α-catenin, β-catenin, and E-cadherin. Desmosome consists of three kinds of molecules with binding to keratin.

Molecules are absorbed from intestinal lumen into the tissue via three pathways. Lipid soluble molecules, small hydrophilic molecules, ions, and water pass through the cell body. Ions and water are also absorbed intracellularly which is called the pore pathway. Bigger molecules (>600 Da) can be absorbed when the tight junction becomes loose or collapses by inflammation or other harmful stimuli. The modes of action for opening pore pathway by interleukin-13 (IL-13) and leak pathway by tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) are relatively well known. Signaling from IL-13 receptor, activate casein kinase 2 and phosphorylate occluding successively which allows the interaction of claudin-2 and occluding linking with zonula occluden-1 (ZO-1) as shown in Figure 3. In the case of TNF-α, myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK) is activated and endocytosis of occluding is promoted which results in the collapse of tight junction.

3. How to Evaluate Intestinal Barrier Function

Oral administration of evaluating-reagents is a standard method and carried out most frequently in in vivo study. Especially, the administration of two non-metabolized sugars, lactulose and mannitol, is used as a golden standard method for human-targeted studies. The absorption of lactulose is increased when the paracellular epithelial barrier is compromised whereas the smaller sized mannitol is constantly absorbed regardless of barrier function, which reflects the basal ability of intestinal absorption. Hence, the value of urine lactulose/mannitol ratio is used as an index of disruption of the intestinal barrier. However, these sugars can detect the status of barrier function in the small intestine only since these are degraded by bacteria. Sucralose and 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) can evaluate whole intestinal permeability since these molecules are not metabolized by bacteria and used widely from in vitro studies to clinical studies.

The size of these sugars and 51Cr-(EDTA is small so that more big-sized molecules which are not non-metabolized by human enzymes and bacteria are also used in animal studies, in vitro and ex vivo, to evaluate absorption of molecules from the leak pathway. Ovalbumin (OVA) is frequently used to measure antigen uptake following oral gavage. Polyethylene glycol and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran are convenient to estimate the size of the molecule that leaks from the lumen since various molecular sizes of them are available. The molecular weight of these reagents which are most frequently used is around 4000.

There are several other methods to evaluate permeability. Calculating the electrical resistance of the cell membrane, which reflects paracellular ion permeability, is specifically applicable to in vitro and ex vivo study. In addition, various biomarkers relating to epithelial damage including citrulline, fatty acid-binding proteins (FABP) and LPS have been used as an indirect index of decreased intestinal barrier as shown elsewhere in detail.

4.1.1. Fermentation of Dietary Fiber and SCFA

Dietary fibers are largely metabolized by gut bacteria. This is because they can break down various types of carbohydrates since they encode over 260 glycoside hydrolases for the degradation of carbohydrates whereas a human has only 17 enzymes for digestion, meaning that human themselves are poor at digesting a variety of dietary fiber. In addition, more than 100 trillion bacteria can be engaged in consuming carbohydrates derived from dietary fiber that would help effective digestion of dietary fiber. Hence, dietary fibers resistant to digestion by the host are termed as microbiota-accessible carbohydrates (MACs). Dietary fibers are divided into soluble and insoluble fibers. Insoluble fiber includes cellulose, some hemicellulose, and lignin. Soluble fiber encompasses wheat dextrin, pectin, gums, β-glucan, psyllium, and fructans, as well as some hemicellulose. These fibers are derived from grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Generally, insoluble fibers are poorly fermented by gut microbes, but they likely promote the gut transit rate and thus reduce the amount of time available for colonic bacterial fermentation of non-digested foodstuff. Soluble fibers can be further processed by bacteria into SCFAs as metabolites although some of them are not fermentable including psyllium and gums.

Different types of bacteria produce different types of SCFAs. The most abundant SCFAs in the human colon are acetate, propionate, and butyrate, with a molar ratio of 60:20:20, approximately. Colonocytes absorb SCFAs via transporters or simple diffusion. SCFA are transported to various organs via solute carrier family 16 member 1 (SLC16a1) and SLC5a8, transporters for SCFAs. A majority of the acetate bypasses the splanchnic circulation to be converted into acetyl-CoA for lipogenesis or oxidation in peripheral muscles. The remaining acetate is converted to butyrate and is used by colonocytes. Propionate primarily contributes to gluconeogenesis in liver. Some bacteria species intake lactate and succinate and convert them into propionates. These physiological functions are regulated by SCFAs via G-protein coupled receptors including GPR40, GPR41, GPR43, and GPR120, which are distributed across various types of cells. GPR41 and GPR43 are highly expressed in the intestine. It has been reported that, in humans, the fecal SCFA level increases after intaking an MACs-rich diet.

4.1.2. Contribution of SCFA to Intestinal Barrier

Butyrate is a well-documented beneficial factor for maintaining colonocyte health by providing energy to intestinal epithelial cells, which likely contributes to intestinal epithelial integrity. Butyrate suppresses cytokine-induced barrier dysfunction by modifying claudin-2 levels in vitro. Animal studies have also shown similar protective effects on not only the intestinal barrier but also the airway epithelial barrier. Fecal calprotectin, a marker of intestinal inflammation, is diminished by administration of butyrate to UC patients. In addition to these effects, butyrate seems to maintain intestinal integrity by inducing colonic mucin expression as shown in an in vitro study. Besides, animal studies show that acetate directly activates nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in gut epithelial cells which results in the release of IL-18, which, in turn, promotes intestinal barrier integrity via activation of IL-18 receptor on the mice epithelial cells. However, genetical knocking out of IL-18 in the whole body or blocking of IL-18 receptor enhances the sensitivity to chemicals which induces colitis in mice, suggesting that acetate contributes to maintaining the epithelial barrier via NLRP3 signaling, followed by IL-18 production. Propionate also diminishes hyper intestinal permeability induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) via amelioration of downregulation of ZO-1, occludin, and E-cadherin expressions in the colonic tissue in mice. Recently, acetate, propionate, and butyrate have been shown to synergistically promote intracellular permeability by modifying TJ expression or distribution, including ZO-1 in vitro. Together with these findings, SFCAs are recognized as a key factor for maintaining the intestinal barrier (Figure 4).

4.1.3. Contribution of Dietary Fiber to Intestinal Barrier Integrity

The impact of MACs on intestinal permeability has been investigated through two kinds of approaches using a fiber-deprived or high fiber diet. Mice fed on an MACs-deprived diet exhibited severe colitis and increased intestinal permeability induced by DSS along with less serum IL-18 levels in mice. A recent animal study targeting mice demonstrated that the removal of MACs affects the secretions of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-2, which synergistically ameliorate intestinal injury and improve intestinal healing: they are downregulated in ileum and colon, along with increased intestinal permeability. These results indicate that MACs contribute to the intestinal barrier via regulating the intestinal immune system and regulation of secretion of peptide hormones from colonocytes (Figure 4). Besides, the supplementation of fructo-oligosaccharides that are produced by degradation of inulin, a representative water-soluble dietary fiber, induces IgA production in rat cecum and suppresses a MACs-deficient diet-induced decrease in intestinal permeability. In addition, the severity of DSS-induced colitis is diminished after administration of an MACs-containing diet, along with a marked increase in fecal butyrate. These results also suggest that MACs have beneficial effects on the intestinal barrier. Nevertheless, whether MAC supplementation is really recommended to maintain intestinal health including barrier function is not confirmed yet since some clinical studies show beneficial effects of fructo-oligosaccharides and polydextrose on intestinal barrier function in healthy subjects or patients of pancreatitis, but administration of oat β-glucan, arabinoxylan (soluble hemicellulose) do not show significant effects on acute indomethacin-induced intestinal hyperpermeability. Oligofructose-enriched inulin also does not improve intestinal barrier function effective in the patients of celiac disease.

4.2. MACs-Induced Alteration of Microbiota and Intestinal Barrier Integrity

Several studies have shown alteration of microbiota after MAC administration. The fecal microbiota composition of HFD-fed mice is modified by inulin administration in a dose-dependent manner. In this study, populations of Roseburia, Clostridium I, IV, and XIV spp. decreased, whereas the levels of Bifidobacterium spp. and Bacteroidetes increased, along with decreased caloric intake. Another study targeting humans with mild constipation also demonstrated that inulin induces an increase in the populations of Anaerostipes, Bilophila, and Bifidobacterium genus. Especially, Bilophila spp. have been reported to be associated with softer stool and a favorable change in constipation-specific quality-of-life measures. In addition, T2D is associated with reduced abundance of fiber-degrading bacteria in humans. On the other hand, prolonged low-fiber feeding aggravated allergic airway disease in mice, which could be corrected by administration of the SCFA propionate, implying alternation of microbiota. These results suggest that MACs exhibit a favorable effect on microbiota and intestinal health that would affect the state of various systemic diseases, although the precise mechanism remains unknown. Besides, an MAC-deprived diet leads to an increase in levels of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (B. thetaiotaomicron), which intakes intestinal mucus glycans in mice. Of note, microbiota transplant to germ-free mice showed that the population of mucin-degrading bacteria including B. thetaiotaomicron and Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila) increased in the intestine under deficiency of dietary MACs. Interestingly, animal study shows that A. muciniphila is a promising probiotic bacteria despite its mucin-degrading feature. A. muciniphila accounts for 1–4% of human gut microbiota starting from early life. Decreased population of A. muciniphila has been reported in patients with IBD. Conversely, the population of intestinal A. muciniphila increased in accordance with DSS-induced colitis in mice. However, intervention studies indicate protective effects of A. muciniphila on intestinal integrity or inflammatory states in an animal colitis model. Administration of live A. muciniphila ameliorates DSS-induced colitis along with suppression of increase in intestinal permeability in mice. Another animal study demonstrated that spleen weight, colon inflammation index, and colon histological score as well as the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IFN-γ in the colon are decreased by the administration of A. muciniphila. Furthermore, outer membrane protein derived from A. muciniphila also shows similar protective effects in a mice colitis model. This protein has been shown to enhance intracellular permeability, activate signaling pathway through Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4, and modulate cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. The mode of action of A. muciniphila in serving these effects is still unclear. Further investigation might disclose this mechanism in the future.

5.1.1. Effects of Fatty Acid and HFD on Intestinal Barrier

Dietary fats-derived fatty acids are broadly categorized into saturated or unsaturated fatty acids. In parallel, there is another classification based on the length of fatty acids: SFCAs, middle-chain fatty acids (MCFAs), and long-chain fatty acid (LCFAs). They have the ability to affect paracellular permeability as demonstrated in previous in vitro studies. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and γ-linolenic acid, which belong to unsaturated LCFAs increase TJ permeability under normal physiological state without any disruptive stimuli to the intestinal barrier in Caco-2 cells. However, these LCFAs decrease the TJ permeability in T84 cells, a cell line similar to Caco-2 cells. In addition, EPA and DHA reduce IL-4-mediated increase in paracellular permeability in T84 cells. Both capric acid and lauric acid, known as saturated MCFAs, enhance the increase in paracellular permeability through activation of MLCK in Caco-2 cells. Additionally, capric acid induces conformational alteration of TJ proteins including occludin and ZO-1, whereas lauric acid does not. These results indicate that dietary fats can alter intestinal permeability through the TJ-associated paracellular route by interacting with epithelial cells directly (Figure 5).

Etiological studies show the association of LCFAs with IBD progression, which implies that LCFAs alter the intestinal barrier function in humans. A large prospective cohort study demonstrated a relationship between higher consumption of DHA and a decrease in the incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC). Association of n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) with IBD state has also been reported. Generally, n-6 PUFAs are suggested to trigger or enhance inflammatory signaling pathways, whereas n-3 PUFAs exhibit anti-inflammatory effects. Higher intake of n-3 PUFA is associated with an increase in n-3/n-6 ratio in the erythrocyte membrane of the IBD patients who are in a remission state compared to those who had relapsed. Serum n-3 fatty acids and EPA levels have been reported to be positively correlated with pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and disease activity, whereas serum n-6 fatty acids are inversely correlated with these indexes.

HFD can induce an increase in intestinal permeability in mice or rats with decreased mRNA or protein expression of TJ including claudins-1, claudins-2, claudins-3, and ZO-1. More specifically, in IL-10 knockout mice with IBD, IBD-like colitis is spontaneously triggered with an increase in intestinal permeability. A high saturated fat diet was observed to promote Th1 immune response and increase the incidence of colitis. These effects possibly arise due to an increased population of Bilophila wadsworthi, a sulfite-reducing pathobiont, through taurine-conjugation of hepatic bile acids. Mice fed a high-fat and high-sugar combination diet showed increased fecal inflammatory markers with increased levels of proteobacteria in the stool. In accordance with these changes, these mice are more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis. HFD also affects IgA secretion. The level of secretory IgA coating the gut microbiota is elevated both in normal diet and HFD fed mice. However, this increase is diminished in HFD fed mice. Hence, HFD diet induces an increase in intestinal permeability via downregulation of TJ and alters the immune response mediated by T cells and IgA-producing plasma cells in vivo.

5.1.2. HFD-Induced LPS Absorption and Intestinal Barrier

Increased LPS absorption from leaky gut has been suggested by several studies on HFD-fed mice showing increased permeability with elevated serum LPS levels. On the other hand, mice injected with LPS exhibited a reduction in plasma HDL cholesterol and elevations in plasma triglycerides. A human cohort study also demonstrated that high serum LPS level in type 1 diabetic patients is associated with high serum triglyceride levels and increased diastolic blood pressure. These results suggest that leaky gut affects dyslipidemia via absorption of LPS (Figure 5). In fact, mouse models have shown the importance of TLR4, a receptor for LPS, and its signaling in diet-induced insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. TLR4 knockout mice are resistant to HFD-induced glucose intolerance as well as HFD-induced atherosclerosis. Similarly, human studies have shown that high fat and high carbohydrate intake modulates TLR2 and TLR4 expression in mononuclear cells with increased LPS level in the serum. Besides, LPS stimulates T helper cell (Th) 17 differentiation though TLR4 in response to LPS that may contribute to an LPS-induced inflammatory reaction, since IL-17A decreases the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α, which is anti-inflammatory and inhibits fatty-acid oxidation. An advanced study has shown that leukocyte infiltration to the liver and mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines TLR4 and TLR9 were increased in HFD-fed mice, in which the intestinal barrier was disrupted by co-administration of DSS with HFD, which downregulated ZO-1 and Claudin-1 expression in the colon, suggesting that leaky gut and the following attack to liver by LPS are involved in pathogenesis of liver dysfunction.

5.2. Alteration of Microbiome by HFD and Intestinal Permeability

Several studies have shown alteration of the microbiome by HFD both in animals and humans. A recent study demonstrated the possibility that HFD-induced alteration of the microbiome indirectly modulates the expression of TJ. Constant light exposure with HFD induces glucose abnormalities, insulin resistance, inflammation, and liver steatohepatitis in mice, which is associated with less abundance of Butyricicoccus, Clostridium, and Turicibacter, also known as butyrate producers. These changes correlate with decreased butyrate levels in colon contests, decreased colon expressions of occludin-1 and ZO-1, and increased serum LPS and mRNA expression of liver LPS-binding protein. As described earlier, A. muciniphila exhibits protective effects on intestinal permeability. The effect of these bacteria on intestinal barrier dysfunction is induced by HFD and associated systemic disorders, including obesity and T2D. An abundance of A. muciniphila is negatively correlated with fasting blood glucose, waist-to-hip ratio, and subcutaneous fat cell diameter in obese subjects and an increased abundance of A. muciniphila positively correlates with improvement in insulin sensitivity markers and other clinical parameters after calorie restriction. Compared to healthy subjects, T2D patients harbor less fecal A. muciniphila extracellular vehicles (AmEVs), which suppresses HFD-induced weight gain, increased plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose, along with downregulation of intestinal TLR4 and TJ mRNAs in mice. In addition, the membrane protein derived from A. muciniphila reduces intolerance to glucose and plasma LPS levels along with upregulation of the molecules related to insulin signaling and claudin-3. These results imply that A. muciniphila exhibits a beneficial effect on HFD-induced disorders and intestinal barrier integrity might be involved in this mechanism (Figure 5).

5.3. Bile Acids and Intestinal Permeability

Bile acids (BAs) secreted from duodenum help in digestion of lipids as well as cholesterol and fat-soluble vitamins. HFD induce enhanced BA discharge, resulting in increased colonic concentrations of primary BAs, compared with low or normal fat diets. However, 5% to 10% of BAs are not reabsorbed but are converted to secondary bile acids by bacteria in the large intestine. Secondary bile acids are harmful and are suggested to promote colon carcinogenesis. In addition to their role in dietary lipid absorption and cholesterol homeostasis, bile acids act as signaling molecules via two major signaling pathways. One is G protein-coupled bile acid receptor (GPBAR1, also known as TGR5) and another comprises members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily including the farnesoid X receptor (FXR). Animal studies indicate that both GPBAR1 and FXR contribute to the integrity of the intestinal barrier. GPBAR1 knock out mice show abnormal molecular architecture of epithelial TJ with increased expression and abnormal subcellular distribution of zonulin-1 with increased intestinal permeability. In addition, these mice are more sensitive to DSS stimuli and exhibit severe colitis. Activation of GPBAR1 with synthetic agonist reversed intestinal inflammation in chemically induced colitis models. The possible mechanisms include reduction in the trafficking of monocytes from blood to intestinal mucosa and modulation of the activation state of macrophages which results in decreased expression of inflammatory genes, including TNF-a, IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-6, and CCL2. Intestinal permeability is increased in FXR knockout mice and FXR-agonist exhibits a protective effect on chemically induced colitis with reduced epithelial permeability and several inflammatory responses. A recent study demonstrated that gut-specific FXR-deficient mice exhibit increased intestinal permeability, possibly due to reduced mucosal integrity, associated with decreased secretion of mucin 2 protein and lower levels of E-cadherin protein. Taken together, these results indicate that BAs maintain the intestinal barrier through the BA sensing receptor at least partially (Figure 5).

6. Concluding Remarks

We reviewed the effect of dietary fiber and fats on intestinal permeability and microbiome, and the correlations between them. Dietary fiber is recognized as a protective nutrient for the intestinal barrier and contributes to maintaining the microbiota in a healthy state. These beneficial effects are mediated by SCFAs, and epithelial IL-18 seems to be involved in a molecular mechanism of barrier-regulation. In contrast, fats likely promote an increase in epithelial permeability. In vitro studies show that fatty acids directly impair the epithelial barrier. Besides, fat-induced increased plasma LPS levels are able to disrupt the intestinal barrier. These findings indicate that a westernized diet contains high fats and poor fibers likely to induce or exacerbate various systemic diseases due to bad intestinal health including impaired intestinal barrier function. In addition, both dietary fiber and high fat can affect the relative population of A. muciniphila which imparts a protective effect on intestinal barrier integrity and disease state, suggesting possible causative relationships between dietary fibers and fats, microbiome, LGS, and systemic diseases. Nevertheless, these relationships have a missing link since the molecules which are responsible for LGS and the successive dysfunction of various organs are not identified. To clarify this point, we should identify the precise region of LGS which conventional LGS-evaluating reagents cannot do. This is the bottleneck to evaluate whether the subjects are LGS or not in animals and clinical studies. That is why leaky gut is not something that can be concluded as easily so far, especially in humans. Improvement of LGS-evaluating methods or development of an ex vivo organ like an organoid would connect the missing link and provide more information about the relationship between nutrients and LGS.

References 151

  1. 1.

    Chadwick V.S., Phillips S.F., Hofmann A.F. Measurements of intestinal permeability using low molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEG 400). II. Application to normal and abnormal permeability states in man and animals. Gastroenterology. 1977;73:247-251.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0016-5085(19)32197-3

  2. 2.

    Bjarnason I., Peters T.J., Veall N. A persistent defect in intestinal permeability in coeliac disease demonstrated by a 51Cr-labelled EDTA absorption test. Lancet. 1983;1:323-325.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91628-8

  3. 3.

    Hollander D., Vadheim C.M., Brettholz E., Petersen G.M., Delahunty T., Rotter J.I. Increased intestinal permeability in patients with Crohn’s disease and their relatives. A possible etiologic factor. Ann. Intern. Med. 1986;105:883-885.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-105-6-883

  4. 4.

    Oulas A., Pavloudi C., Polymenakou P., Pavlopoulos G.A., Papanikolaou N., Kotoulas G., Arvanitidis C., Iliopoulos I. Metagenomics: Tools and insights for analyzing next-generation sequencing data derived from biodiversity studies. Bioinform. Biol. Insights. 2015;9:75-88.

    Not in our library10.4137/bbi.s12462

  5. 5.

    Bäckhed F., Ley R.E., Sonnenburg J.L., Peterson D.A., Gordon J.I. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005;307:1915-1920.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1104816

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Ciccarelli F.D., Doerks T., von Mering C., Creevey C.J., Snel B., Bork P. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science. 2006;311:1283-1287.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1123061

  8. 8.

    Tocheva E.I., Matson E.G., Morris D.M., Moussavi F., Leadbetter J.R., Jensen G.J. Peptidoglycan remodeling and conversion of an inner membrane into an outer membrane during sporulation. Cell. 2011;146:799-812.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.029

  9. 9.

    Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207-214.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11234

  10. 10.

    Guarner F., Malagelada J.R. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361:512-519.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12489-0

  11. 11.

    Stecher B., Hardt W.D. The role of microbiota in infectious disease. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:107-114.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.008

  12. 12.

    Hold G.L., Smith M., Grange C., Watt E.R., El-Omar E.M., Mukhopadhya I. Role of the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: What have we learnt in the past 10 years? World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1192-1210.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1192

  13. 13.

    Tilg H., Adolph T.E., Gerner R.R., Moschen A.R. The Intestinal Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:954-964.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.004

  14. 14.

    Grochowska M., Wojnar M., Radkowski M. The gut microbiota in neuropsychiatric disorders. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. Wars. 2018;78:69-81.

    Not in our library10.21307/ane-2018-008

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Glorieux G., Gryp T., Perna A. Gut-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Immune Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins. 2020;12:245.

    Not in our library10.3390/toxins12040245

  17. 17.

    Hansen T.H., Gøbel R.J., Hansen T., Pedersen O. The gut microbiome in cardio-metabolic health. Genome Med. 2015;7:33.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13073-015-0157-z

  18. 18.

    Salguero M.V., Al-Obaide M.A.I., Singh R., Siepmann T., Vasylyeva T.L. Dysbiosis of Gram-negative gut microbiota and the associated serum lipopolysaccharide exacerbates inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019;18:3461-3469.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2019.7943

  19. 19.

    Xi Y., Yan J., Li M., Ying S., Shi Z. Gut microbiota dysbiosis increases the risk of visceral gout in goslings through translocation of gut-derived lipopolysaccharide. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5361-5373.

    Not in our library10.3382/ps/pez357

  20. 20.

    Belančić A. Gut microbiome dysbiosis and endotoxemia—Additional pathophysiological explanation for increased COVID-19 severity in obesity. Obes. Med. 2020;20:100302.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100302

  21. 21.

    Pastor Rojo O., López San Román A., Albéniz Arbizu E., de la Hera Martínez A., Ripoll Sevillano E., Albillos Martínez A. Serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in endotoxemic patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2007;13:269-277.

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.20019

  22. 22.

    Keita A.V., Söderholm J.D. The intestinal barrier and its regulation by neuroimmune factors. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2010;22:718-733.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01498.x

  23. 23.

    Quigley E.M. Leaky gut—Concept or clinical entity? Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2016;32:74-79.

    Not in our library10.1097/mog.0000000000000243

  24. 24.

    Van der Sluis M., De Koning B.A., De Bruijn A.C., Velcich A., Meijerink J.P., Van Goudoever J.B., Büller H.A., Dekker J., Van Seuningen I., Renes I.B., et al. Muc2-deficient mice spontaneously develop colitis, indicating that MUC2 is critical for colonic protection. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:117-129.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.020

  25. 25.

    Wang S.L., Shao B.Z., Zhao S.B., Fang J., Gu L., Miao C.Y., Li Z.S., Bai Y. Impact of Paneth Cell Autophagy on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:693.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.00693

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Camilleri M. Leaky gut: Mechanisms, measurement and clinical implications in humans. Gut. 2019;68:1516-1526.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318427

  28. 28.

    Buckley A., Turner J.R. Cell Biology of Tight Junction Barrier Regulation and Mucosal Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018;10:a029314.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a029314

  29. 29.

    Liu F., Koval M., Ranganathan S., Fanayan S., Hancock W.S., Lundberg E.K., Beavis R.C., Lane L., Duek P., McQuade L., et al. Systems Proteomics View of the Endogenous Human Claudin Protein Family. J. Proteome Res. 2016;15:339-359.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00769

  30. 30.

    Holmes J.L., Van Itallie C.M., Rasmussen J.E., Anderson J.M. Claudin profiling in the mouse during postnatal intestinal development and along the gastrointestinal tract reveals complex expression patterns. Gene Expr. Patterns. 2006;6:581-588.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.modgep.2005.12.001

  31. 31.

    Saitou M., Fujimoto K., Doi Y., Itoh M., Fujimoto T., Furuse M., Takano H., Noda T., Tsukita S. Occludin-deficient embryonic stem cells can differentiate into polarized epithelial cells bearing tight junctions. J. Cell Biol. 1998;141:397-408.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.141.2.397

  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Hollander D., Kaunitz J.D. The "Leaky Gut": Tight Junctions but Loose Associations? Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020;65:1277-1287.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10620-019-05777-2

  35. 35.

    Farquhar M.G., Palade G.E. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J. Cell Biol. 1963;17:375-412.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.17.2.375

  36. 36.

    Fihn B.M., Sjöqvist A., Jodal M. Permeability of the rat small intestinal epithelium along the villus-crypt axis: Effects of glucose transport. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1029-1036.

    Not in our library10.1053/gast.2000.18148

  37. 37.

    Weber C.R., Raleigh D.R., Su L., Shen L., Sullivan E.A., Wang Y., Turner J.R. Epithelial myosin light chain kinase activation induces mucosal interleukin-13 expression to alter tight junction ion selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:12037-12046.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.064808

  38. 38.

    Heller F., Florian P., Bojarski C., Richter J., Christ M., Hillenbrand B., Mankertz J., Gitter A.H., Bürgel N., Fromm M., et al. Interleukin-13 is the key effector Th2 cytokine in ulcerative colitis that affects epithelial tight junctions, apoptosis, and cell restitution. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:550-564.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.002

  39. 39.

    Suenaert P., Bulteel V., Lemmens L., Noman M., Geypens B., Van Assche G., Geboes K., Ceuppens J.L., Rutgeerts P. Anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment restores the gut barrier in Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2000-2004.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05914.x

  40. 40.

    Nighot M., Ganapathy A.S., Saha K., Suchanec E., Castillo E., Gregory A., Shapiro S., Ma T., Nighot P. Matrix Metalloproteinase MMP-12 promotes macrophage transmigration across intestinal epithelial tight junctions and increases severity of experimental colitis. J. Crohns Colitis. 2021;jjab064.

    Not in our library10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab064

  41. 41.

    Zhang B., Yue R., Chen Y., Huang X., Yang M., Shui J., Peng Y. The Herbal Medicine Scutellaria-Coptis Alleviates Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Damage in Diabetic Rats by Inhibiting Inflammation and Modulating the Gut Microbiota. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020;2020:4568629.

    Not in our library10.1155/2020/4568629

  42. 42.
  43. 43.

    Menard S., Cerf-Bensussan N., Heyman M. Multiple facets of intestinal permeability and epithelial handling of dietary antigens. Mucosal Immunol. 2010;3:247-259.

    Not in our library10.1038/mi.2010.5

  44. 44.
  45. 45.

    Galipeau H.J., Verdu E.F. The complex task of measuring intestinal permeability in basic and clinical science. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2016;28:957-965.

    Not in our library10.1111/nmo.12871

  46. 46.

    Clarke L.L. A guide to Ussing chamber studies of mouse intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G1151-G1166.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.90649.2008

  47. 47.
  48. 48.

    Sonnenburg E.D., Smits S.A., Tikhonov M., Higginbottom S.K., Wingreen N.S., Sonnenburg J.L. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212-215.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature16504

  49. 49.
  50. 50.

    Swann O.G., Kilpatrick M., Breslin M., Oddy W.H. Dietary fiber and its associations with depression and inflammation. Nutr. Rev. 2020;78:394-411.

    Not in our library10.1093/nutrit/nuz072

  51. 51.

    Titgemeyer E.C., Bourquin L.D., Fahey G.C., Garleb K.A. Fermentability of various fiber sources by human fecal bacteria in vitro. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;53:1418-1424.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/53.6.1418

  52. 52.

    Kim C.H. Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites. Immunology. 2018;154:220-229.

    Not in our library10.1111/imm.12930

  53. 53.

    Mahowald M.A., Rey F.E., Seedorf H., Turnbaugh P.J., Fulton R.S., Wollam A., Shah N., Wang C., Magrini V., Wilson R.K., et al. Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:5859-5864.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0901529106

  54. 54.

    Rios-Covian D., Gueimonde M., Duncan S.H., Flint H.J., de los Reyes-Gavilan C.G. Enhanced butyrate formation by cross-feeding between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015;362:fnv176.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsle/fnv176

  55. 55.
  56. 56.
  57. 57.

    Schirmer M., Smeekens S.P., Vlamakis H., Jaeger M., Oosting M., Franzosa E.A., Ter Horst R., Jansen T., Jacobs L., Bonder M.J., et al. Linking the Human Gut Microbiome to Inflammatory Cytokine Production Capacity. Cell. 2016;167:1125-1136.e8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.020

  58. 58.

    Canfora E.E., Jocken J.W., Blaak E.E. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015;11:577-591.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2015.128

  59. 59.

    Kim C.H., Park J., Kim M. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain Fatty acids, T cells, and inflammation. Immune Netw. 2014;14:277-288.

    Not in our library10.4110/in.2014.14.6.277

  60. 60.
  61. 61.

    Zambell K.L., Fitch M.D., Fleming S.E. Acetate and butyrate are the major substrates for de novo lipogenesis in rat colonic epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2003;133:3509-3515.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/133.11.3509

  62. 62.

    Kim M.H., Kang S.G., Park J.H., Yanagisawa M., Kim C.H. Short-chain fatty acids activate GPR41 and GPR43 on intestinal epithelial cells to promote inflammatory responses in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:e1-e10.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.056

  63. 63.

    Pham V.T., Calatayud M., Rotsaert C., Seifert N., Richard N., Van den Abbeele P., Marzorati M., Steinert R.E. Antioxidant Vitamins and Prebiotic FOS and XOS Differentially Shift Microbiota Composition and Function and Improve Intestinal Epithelial Barrier In Vitro. Nutrients. 2021;13:1125.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu13041125

  64. 64.

    Mathewson N.D., Jenq R., Mathew A.V., Koenigsknecht M., Hanash A., Toubai T., Oravecz-Wilson K., Wu S.R., Sun Y., Rossi C., et al. Gut microbiome-derived metabolites modulate intestinal epithelial cell damage and mitigate graft-versus-host disease. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:505-513.

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.3400

  65. 65.

    Huang X., Oshima T., Tomita T., Fukui H., Miwa H. Butyrate Alleviates Cytokine-Induced Barrier Dysfunction by Modifying Claudin-2 Levels. Biology. 2021;10:205.

    Not in our library10.3390/biology10030205

  66. 66.

    Chen G., Ran X., Li B., Li Y., He D., Huang B., Fu S., Liu J., Wang W. Sodium Butyrate Inhibits Inflammation and Maintains Epithelium Barrier Integrity in a TNBS-induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease Mice Model. EBioMedicine. 2018;30:317-325.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.030

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Richards L.B., Li M., Folkerts G., Henricks P.A.J., Garssen J., van Esch B. Butyrate and Propionate Restore the Cytokine and House Dust Mite Compromised Barrier Function of Human Bronchial Airway Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;22:65.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms22010065

  69. 69.

    Vernero M., De Blasio F., Ribaldone D.G., Bugianesi E., Pellicano R., Saracco G.M., Astegiano M., Caviglia G.P. The Usefulness of Microencapsulated Sodium Butyrate Add-On Therapy in Maintaining Remission in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:3941.

    Not in our library10.3390/jcm9123941

  70. 70.

    Gaudier E., Jarry A., Blottière H.M., de Coppet P., Buisine M.P., Aubert J.P., Laboisse C., Cherbut C., Hoebler C. Butyrate specifically modulates MUC gene expression in intestinal epithelial goblet cells deprived of glucose. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G1168-G1174.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00219.2004

  71. 71.

    Macia L., Tan J., Vieira A.T., Leach K., Stanley D., Luong S., Maruya M., Ian McKenzie C., Hijikata A., Wong C., et al. Metabolite-sensing receptors GPR43 and GPR109A facilitate dietary fibre-induced gut homeostasis through regulation of the inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6734.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7734

  72. 72.

    Nowarski R., Jackson R., Gagliani N., de Zoete M.R., Palm N.W., Bailis W., Low J.S., Harman C.C., Graham M., Elinav E., et al. Epithelial IL-18 Equilibrium Controls Barrier Function in Colitis. Cell. 2015;163:1444-1456.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.072

  73. 73.

    Impellizzeri D., Siracusa R., Cordaro M., Peritore A.F., Gugliandolo E., Mancuso G., Midiri A., Di Paola R., Cuzzocrea S. Therapeutic potential of dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS)-induced colitis in mice by targeting IL-1β and IL-18. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018;155:150-161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2018.06.029

  74. 74.

    Sivakumar P.V., Westrich G.M., Kanaly S., Garka K., Born T.L., Derry J.M., Viney J.L. Interleukin 18 is a primary mediator of the inflammation associated with dextran sulphate sodium induced colitis: Blocking interleukin 18 attenuates intestinal damage. Gut. 2002;50:812-820.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.50.6.812

  75. 75.
  76. 76.

    Feng Y., Wang Y., Wang P., Huang Y., Wang F. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Manifest Stimulative and Protective Effects on Intestinal Barrier Function Through the Inhibition of NLRP3 Inflammasome and Autophagy. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;49:190-205.

    Not in our library10.1159/000492853

  77. 77.

    Hytting-Andreasen R., Balk-Møller E., Hartmann B., Pedersen J., Windeløv J.A., Holst J.J., Kissow H. Endogenous glucagon-like peptide- 1 and 2 are essential for regeneration after acute intestinal injury in mice. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198046.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0198046

  78. 78.

    Maruta K., Takajo T., Akiba Y., Said H., Irie E., Kato I., Kuwahara A., Kaunitz J.D. GLP-2 Acutely Prevents Endotoxin-Related Increased Intestinal Paracellular Permeability in Rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020;65:2605-2618.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10620-020-06097-6

  79. 79.

    Hunt J.E., Hartmann B., Schoonjans K., Holst J.J., Kissow H. Dietary Fiber Is Essential to Maintain Intestinal Size, L-Cell Secretion, and Intestinal Integrity in Mice. Front. Endocrinol. 2021;12:640602.

    Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2021.640602

  80. 80.

    Genda T., Sasaki Y., Kondo T., Hino S., Nishimura N., Tsukahara T., Sonoyama K., Morita T. Fructo-oligosaccharide-Induced Transient Increases in Cecal Immunoglobulin A Concentrations in Rats Are Associated with Mucosal Inflammation in Response to Increased Gut Permeability. J. Nutr. 2017;147:1900-1908.

    Not in our library10.3945/jn.117.253955

  81. 81.

    Wang S., Zhang S., Huang S., Wu Z., Pang J., Wu Y., Wang J., Han D. Resistant Maltodextrin Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Intestinal Inflammatory Injury by Increasing Butyric Acid to Inhibit Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020;2020:7694734.

    Not in our library10.1155/2020/7694734

  82. 82.
  83. 83.

    Chen T., Ma Y., Xu L., Sun C., Xu H., Zhu J. Soluble Dietary Fiber Reduces Feeding Intolerance in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomized Study. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2021;45:125-135.

    Not in our library10.1002/jpen.1816

  84. 84.

    Drabińska N., Krupa-Kozak U., Jarocka-Cyrta E. Intestinal Permeability in Children with Celiac Disease after the Administration of Oligofructose-Enriched Inulin into a Gluten-Free Diet-Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Pilot Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12:1736.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu12061736

  85. 85.

    Ganda Mall J.P., Fart F., Sabet J.A., Lindqvist C.M., Nestestog R., Hegge F.T., Keita Å.V., Brummer R.J., Schoultz I. Effects of Dietary Fibres on Acute Indomethacin-Induced Intestinal Hyperpermeability in the Elderly: A Randomised Placebo Controlled Parallel Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12:1954.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu12071954

  86. 86.

    Singh A., Zapata R.C., Pezeshki A., Reidelberger R.D., Chelikani P.K. Inulin fiber dose-dependently modulates energy balance, glucose tolerance, gut microbiota, hormones and diet preference in high-fat-fed male rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018;59:142-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.05.017

  87. 87.

    Vandeputte D., Falony G., Vieira-Silva S., Wang J., Sailer M., Theis S., Verbeke K., Raes J. Prebiotic inulin-type fructans induce specific changes in the human gut microbiota. Gut. 2017;66:1968-1974.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313271

  88. 88.

    Karlsson F.H., Tremaroli V., Nookaew I., Bergstrom G., Behre C.J., Fagerberg B., Nielsen J., Backhed F. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature. 2013;498:99-103.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12198

  89. 89.

    Qin J., Li Y., Cai Z., Li S., Zhu J., Zhang F., Liang S., Zhang W., Guan Y., Shen D., et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490:55-60.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11450

  90. 90.

    Trompette A., Gollwitzer E.S., Yadava K., Sichelstiel A.K., Sprenger N., Ngom-Bru C., Blanchard C., Junt T., Nicod L.P., Harris N.L., et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat. Med. 2014;20:159-166.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3444

  91. 91.

    Sonnenburg J.L., Xu J., Leip D.D., Chen C.H., Westover B.P., Weatherford J., Buhler J.D., Gordon J.I. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science. 2005;307:1955-1959.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1109051

  92. 92.

    Desai M.S., Seekatz A.M., Koropatkin N.M., Kamada N., Hickey C.A., Wolter M., Pudlo N.A., Kitamoto S., Terrapon N., Muller A., et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167:1339-1353.e21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043

  93. 93.

    Everard A., Belzer C., Geurts L., Ouwerkerk J.P., Druart C., Bindels L.B., Guiot Y., Derrien M., Muccioli G.G., Delzenne N.M., et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9066-9071.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219451110

  94. 94.

    Derrien M., Collado M.C., Ben-Amor K., Salminen S., de Vos W.M. The Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila is an abundant resident of the human intestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:1646-1648.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01226-07

  95. 95.

    Zhang T., Li P., Wu X., Lu G., Marcella C., Ji X., Ji G., Zhang F. Alterations of Akkermansia muciniphila in the inflammatory bowel disease patients with washed microbiota transplantation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;104:10203-10215.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-020-10948-7

  96. 96.

    Bajer L., Kverka M., Kostovcik M., Macinga P., Dvorak J., Stehlikova Z., Brezina J., Wohl P., Spicak J., Drastich P. Distinct gut microbiota profiles in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017;23:4548-4558.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v23.i25.4548

  97. 97.

    Shang L., Yu H., Liu H., Chen M., Zeng X., Qiao S. Recombinant antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 alleviates DSS-induced colitis via regulating intestinal barrier function and modifying gut microbiota. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;139:111127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111127

  98. 98.
  99. 99.
  100. 100.
  101. 101.

    Wang L., Tang L., Feng Y., Zhao S., Han M., Zhang C., Yuan G., Zhu J., Cao S., Wu Q., et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurised bacterium blunts colitis associated tumourigenesis by modulation of CD8(+) T cells in mice. Gut. 2020;69:1988-1997.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320105

  102. 102.
  103. 103.

    Usami M., Muraki K., Iwamoto M., Ohata A., Matsushita E., Miki A. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells. Clin. Nutr. 2001;20:351-359.

    Not in our library10.1054/clnu.2001.0430

  104. 104.

    Usami M., Komurasaki T., Hanada A., Kinoshita K., Ohata A. Effect of gamma-linolenic acid or docosahexaenoic acid on tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells and their mechanism by protein kinase C activation and/or eicosanoid formation. Nutrition. 2003;19:150-156.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00927-9

  105. 105.

    Willemsen L.E., Koetsier M.A., Balvers M., Beermann C., Stahl B., van Tol E.A. Polyunsaturated fatty acids support epithelial barrier integrity and reduce IL-4 mediated permeability in vitro. Eur. J. Nutr. 2008;47:183-191.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00394-008-0712-0

  106. 106.

    Lindmark T., Nikkilä T., Artursson P. Mechanisms of absorption enhancement by medium chain fatty acids in intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995;275:958-964.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    Anderberg E.K., Lindmark T., Artursson P. Sodium caprate elicits dilatations in human intestinal tight junctions and enhances drug absorption by the paracellular route. Pharm. Res. 1993;10:857-864.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1018909210879

  108. 108.

    John S., Luben R., Shrestha S.S., Welch A., Khaw K.T., Hart A.R. Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the aetiology of ulcerative colitis: A UK prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010;22:602-606.

    Not in our library10.1097/meg.0b013e3283352d05

  109. 109.

    Chapkin R.S., Davidson L.A., Ly L., Weeks B.R., Lupton J.R., McMurray D.N. Immunomodulatory effects of (n-3) fatty acids: Putative link to inflammation and colon cancer. J. Nutr. 2007;137(Suppl. 1):200s-204s.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/137.1.200s

  110. 110.
  111. 111.

    Schreiner P., Martinho-Grueber M., Studerus D., Vavricka S.R., Tilg H., Biedermann L. Nutrition in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Digestion. 2020;101(Suppl. 1):120-135.

    Not in our library10.1159/000505368

  112. 112.

    Uchiyama K., Nakamura M., Odahara S., Koido S., Katahira K., Shiraishi H., Ohkusa T., Fujise K., Tajiri H. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid diet therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1696-1707.

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.21251

  113. 113.

    Scoville E.A., Allaman M.M., Adams D.W., Motley A.K., Peyton S.C., Ferguson S.L., Horst S.N., Williams C.S., Beaulieu D.B., Schwartz D.A., et al. Serum Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Correlate with Serum Cytokines and Clinical Disease Activity in Crohn’s Disease. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:2882.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-39232-z

  114. 114.

    Nascimento J.C., Matheus V.A., Oliveira R.B., Tada S.F.S., Collares-Buzato C.B. High-Fat Diet Induces Disruption of the Tight Junction-Mediated Paracellular Barrier in the Proximal Small Intestine Before the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes and Endotoxemia. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10620-020-06664-x

  115. 115.

    Mujawdiya P.K., Sharma P., Sharad S., Kapur S. Reversal of Increase in Intestinal Permeability by Mangifera indica Seed Kernel Extract in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13:190.

    Not in our library10.3390/ph13080190

  116. 116.

    Tian B., Zhao J., Zhang M., Chen Z., Ma Q., Liu H., Nie C., Zhang Z., An W., Li J. Lycium ruthenicum Anthocyanins Attenuate High-Fat Diet-Induced Colonic Barrier Dysfunction and Inflammation in Mice by Modulating the Gut Microbiota. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021;65:e2000745.

    Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.202000745

  117. 117.

    de La Serre C.B., Ellis C.L., Lee J., Hartman A.L., Rutledge J.C., Raybould H.E. Propensity to high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats is associated with changes in the gut microbiota and gut inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010;299:G440-G448.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00098.2010

  118. 118.

    Zhao J., Wang H., Yang H., Zhou Y., Tang L. Autophagy induction by rapamycin ameliorates experimental colitis and improves intestinal epithelial barrier function in IL-10 knockout mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;81:105977.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105977

  119. 119.

    Devkota S., Wang Y., Musch M.W., Leone V., Fehlner-Peach H., Nadimpalli A., Antonopoulos D.A., Jabri B., Chang E.B. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10-/- mice. Nature. 2012;487:104-108.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11225

  120. 120.
  121. 121.

    Muhomah T.A., Nishino N., Katsumata E., Haoming W., Tsuruta T. High-fat diet reduces the level of secretory immunoglobulin A coating of commensal gut microbiota. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health. 2019;38:55-64.

    Not in our library10.12938/bmfh.18-027

  122. 122.

    Amar J., Burcelin R., Ruidavets J.B., Cani P.D., Fauvel J., Alessi M.C., Chamontin B., Ferriéres J. Energy intake is associated with endotoxemia in apparently healthy men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1219-1223.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1219

  123. 123.

    Yang Y., Zhong Z., Wang B., Xia X., Yao W., Huang L., Wang Y., Ding W. Early-life high-fat diet-induced obesity programs hippocampal development and cognitive functions via regulation of gut commensal Akkermansia muciniphila. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:2054-2064.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41386-019-0437-1

  124. 124.

    Lassenius M.I., Pietiläinen K.H., Kaartinen K., Pussinen P.J., Syrjänen J., Forsblom C., Pörsti I., Rissanen A., Kaprio J., Mustonen J., et al. Bacterial endotoxin activity in human serum is associated with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, obesity, and chronic inflammation. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1809-1815.

    Not in our library10.2337/dc10-2197

  125. 125.

    Shi H., Kokoeva M.V., Inouye K., Tzameli I., Yin H., Flier J.S. TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:3015-3025.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci28898

  126. 126.

    Lee J.J., Wang P.W., Yang I.H., Huang H.M., Chang C.S., Wu C.L., Chuang J.H. High-fat diet induces toll-like receptor 4-dependent macrophage/microglial cell activation and retinal impairment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56:3041-3050.

    Not in our library10.1167/iovs.15-16504

  127. 127.

    Jia L., Vianna C.R., Fukuda M., Berglund E.D., Liu C., Tao C., Sun K., Liu T., Harper M.J., Lee C.E., et al. Hepatocyte Toll-like receptor 4 regulates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3878.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4878

  128. 128.

    Ding Y., Subramanian S., Montes V.N., Goodspeed L., Wang S., Han C., Teresa A.S., Kim J., O’Brien K.D., Chait A. Toll-like receptor 4 deficiency decreases atherosclerosis but does not protect against inflammation in obese low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012;32:1596-1604.

    Not in our library10.1161/atvbaha.112.249847

  129. 129.

    Ghanim H., Abuaysheh S., Sia C.L., Korzeniewski K., Chaudhuri A., Fernandez-Real J.M., Dandona P. Increase in plasma endotoxin concentrations and the expression of Toll-like receptors and suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in mononuclear cells after a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal: Implications for insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2281-2287.

    Not in our library10.2337/dc09-0979

  130. 130.

    Pendyala S., Walker J.M., Holt P.R. A high-fat diet is associated with endotoxemia that originates from the gut. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1100-1101.e2.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.034

  131. 131.

    Park J.H., Jeong S.Y., Choi A.J., Kim S.J. Lipopolysaccharide directly stimulates Th17 differentiation in vitro modulating phosphorylation of RelB and NF-κB1. Immunol. Lett. 2015;165:10-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.imlet.2015.03.003

  132. 132.

    Shen T., Chen X., Li Y., Tang X., Jiang X., Yu C., Zheng Y., Guo H., Ling W. Interleukin-17A exacerbates high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis by inhibiting fatty acid β-oxidation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017;1863:1510-1518.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.01.027

  133. 133.

    Cheng C., Tan J., Qian W., Zhang L., Hou X. Gut inflammation exacerbates hepatic injury in the high-fat diet induced NAFLD mouse: Attention to the gut-vascular barrier dysfunction. Life Sci. 2018;209:157-166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.017

  134. 134.

    Fujisaka S., Avila-Pacheco J., Soto M., Kostic A., Dreyfuss J.M., Pan H., Ussar S., Altindis E., Li N., Bry L., et al. Diet, Genetics, and the Gut Microbiome Drive Dynamic Changes in Plasma Metabolites. Cell Rep. 2018;22:3072-3086.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.060

  135. 135.

    Münch N.S., Fang H.Y., Ingermann J., Maurer H.C., Anand A., Kellner V., Sahm V., Wiethaler M., Baumeister T., Wein F., et al. High-Fat Diet Accelerates Carcinogenesis in a Mouse Model of Barrett’s Esophagus via Interleukin 8 and Alterations to the Gut Microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:492-506.e2.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.013

  136. 136.

    Hassan A.M., Mancano G., Kashofer K., Fröhlich E.E., Matak A., Mayerhofer R., Reichmann F., Olivares M., Neyrinck A.M., Delzenne N.M., et al. High-fat diet induces depression-like behaviour in mice associated with changes in microbiome, neuropeptide Y, and brain metabolome. Nutr. Neurosci. 2019;22:877-893.

    Not in our library10.1080/1028415x.2018.1465713

  137. 137.

    Bisanz J.E., Upadhyay V., Turnbaugh J.A., Ly K., Turnbaugh P.J. Meta-Analysis Reveals Reproducible Gut Microbiome Alterations in Response to a High-Fat Diet. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:265-272.e4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2019.06.013

  138. 138.

    Sun L., Xie C., Wang G., Wu Y., Wu Q., Wang X., Liu J., Deng Y., Xia J., Chen B., et al. Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1919-1929.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4

  139. 139.

    Wei L., Yue F., Xing L., Wu S., Shi Y., Li J., Xiang X., Lam S.M., Shui G., Russell R., et al. Constant Light Exposure Alters Gut Microbiota and Promotes the Progression of Steatohepatitis in High Fat Diet Rats. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1975.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.01975

  140. 140.

    Dao M.C., Everard A., Aron-Wisnewsky J., Sokolovska N., Prifti E., Verger E.O., Kayser B.D., Levenez F., Chilloux J., Hoyles L., et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: Relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. 2016;65:426-436.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778

  141. 141.

    Chelakkot C., Choi Y., Kim D.K., Park H.T., Ghim J., Kwon Y., Jeon J., Kim M.S., Jee Y.K., Gho Y.S., et al. Akkermansia muciniphila-derived extracellular vesicles influence gut permeability through the regulation of tight junctions. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:e450.

    Not in our library10.1038/emm.2017.282

  142. 142.
  143. 143.

    Plovier H., Everard A., Druart C., Depommier C., Van Hul M., Geurts L., Chilloux J., Ottman N., Duparc T., Lichtenstein L., et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat. Med. 2017;23:107-113.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.4236

  144. 144.

    Murakami Y., Tanabe S., Suzuki T. High-fat Diet-induced Intestinal Hyperpermeability is Associated with Increased Bile Acids in the Large Intestine of Mice. J. Food Sci. 2016;81:H216-H222.

    Not in our library10.1111/1750-3841.13166

  145. 145.
  146. 146.

    Chiang J.Y., Pathak P., Liu H., Donepudi A., Ferrell J., Boehme S. Intestinal Farnesoid X Receptor and Takeda G Protein Couple Receptor 5 Signaling in Metabolic Regulation. Dig. Dis. 2017;35:241-245.

    Not in our library10.1159/000450981

  147. 147.
  148. 148.

    Biagioli M., Carino A., Cipriani S., Francisci D., Marchianò S., Scarpelli P., Sorcini D., Zampella A., Fiorucci S. The Bile Acid Receptor GPBAR1 Regulates the M1/M2 Phenotype of Intestinal Macrophages and Activation of GPBAR1 Rescues Mice from Murine Colitis. J. Immunol. 2017;199:718-733.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1700183

  149. 149.

    Inagaki T., Moschetta A., Lee Y.K., Peng L., Zhao G., Downes M., Yu R.T., Shelton J.M., Richardson J.A., Repa J.J., et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:3920-3925.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0509592103

  150. 150.

    Gadaleta R.M., van Erpecum K.J., Oldenburg B., Willemsen E.C., Renooij W., Murzilli S., Klomp L.W., Siersema P.D., Schipper M.E., Danese S., et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2011;60:463-472.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2010.212159

  151. 151.

    Huang M., Kong B., Zhang M., Rizzolo D., Armstrong L.E., Schumacher J.D., Chow M.D., Lee Y.H., Joseph L.B., Stofan M., et al. Enhanced alcoholic liver disease in mice with intestine-specific farnesoid X receptor deficiency. Lab. Investig. 2020;100:1158-1168.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41374-020-0439-y

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.