Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Terpenes and Terpenoids in Plants: Interactions with Environment and Insects

Delbert Almerick T. Boncan, Stacey S.K. Tsang, Chade Li and 4 more

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijms21197382

Abstract

The interactions of plants with environment and insects are bi-directional and dynamic. Consequently, a myriad of mechanisms has evolved to engage organisms in different types of interactions. These interactions can be mediated by allelochemicals known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which include volatile terpenes (VTs). The emission of VTs provides a way for plants to communicate with the environment, including neighboring plants, beneficiaries (e.g., pollinators, seed dispersers), predators, parasitoids, and herbivores, by sending enticing or deterring signals. Understanding terpenoid distribution, biogenesis, and function provides an opportunity for the design and implementation of effective and efficient environmental calamity and pest management strategies. This review provides an overview of plant–environment and plant–insect interactions in the context of terpenes and terpenoids as important chemical mediators of these abiotic and biotic interactions.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1.1. Diversity of Plant Terpenes

Plant secondary metabolites involved in environmental adaptation and stress tolerance can be broadly classified into phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, and terpenoids. Among these classes of compounds, terpenoids are the most diverse, with significant properties in the context of chemical ecology. These compounds are synthesized from the five-carbon precursor units isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and its functional isomer dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP). Subsequent condensation of IPP and DMAPP through the action of isoprenyl diphosphate synthase (IDS—a type of prenyltransferase (PT)) produces acyclic and achiral isoprenyl diphosphate/pyrophosphate (ID, C5n) intermediates including geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP, C10), farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, C15), and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP, C20), which are considered universal terpenoid precursors. Terpene synthases (TPSs) act on one or more of these universal precursors (including DMAPP) to produce a combinatorial diversity of terpenes. To clear out any ambiguity, terpenes are simple hydrocarbons based on combinations of DMAPP and ID, while terpenoids (which are also known as isoprenoids) are terpenes with an oxygen moiety and additional structural rearrangements. Nonetheless, these two terms are used interchangeably. Terpenoids are conveniently classified on the basis of the number of carbon atoms they possess: hemiterpenoids (C5), monoterpenoids (C10), homoterpenoids (C11,16), sesquiterpenoids (C15), diterpenoids (C20), sesterpenoids (C25), triterpenoids (C30), tetraterpenoids (C40), and polyterpenoids (C>40, higher-order terpenoids).

A small fraction (1%) of low-molecular-weight (300 Da) compounds known as plant volatiles are implicated in plant–environment interactions and, to some extent, in the abiotic stress response. Terpenoids that are emitted to communicate with the environment are referred to as volatile terpenes (VTs) and include hemi-, mono-, homo-, sesqui-, and some diterpenoids. The storage and volatility of these terpenoids are largely influenced by their chemical properties (i.e., vapor pressure and hydrophobicity), while their emission rates and patterns depend on abiotic and biotic factors including temperature, humidity, seasonality, irradiance, and interactions with other plants and organisms. The storage of terpenoids concerns plant tissues with specialized structures such as secretory cavities, resin canals, latex canals, glandular trichomes. A study has emphasized that some VTs, referred to as ‘hidden terpenoids’, are chemically modified by glycosylation for storage and upon exposure to stress, may undergo hydrolysis releasing VTs to the atmosphere on demand. There is a consensus agreement that VT production and emission are tightly associated with stress alleviation, allelopathy, and plant–herbivore–carnivore (tritrophic or multitrophic) interactions.

The chemical diversity of terpenoids is driven by the stereo-specific carbocation cyclization, rearrangement, and elimination reactions that transform a few universal ID precursors into core scaffolds of numerous structurally distinct terpenoids. This indicates that a single TPS can give rise to multiple products due to the stochasticity of bond rearrangement following the generation of the unusual carbocation intermediates. Remarkably, the existence of multi-substrate TPS has also been demonstrated to be dependent on the physiological and development status of plants. This further suggests that substrate preference and terpene product profiles may vary in response to fluctuations in the environment. Functional decoration of these core scaffolds by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450) augments the already-existing chemical diversity through oxygenation and further structural rearrangements, resulting in an estimated 80,000 distinct compounds.

1.2. Stress Response and Terpenoid Biosynthetic Genes

The perception and response of plants to abiotic stresses is a complex process involving multiple genes, proteins, enzymes, and metabolites in a highly regulated network (Figure 1). The central component of the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway SnRK2 subfamily participates in the terpene phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway that leads to the activation of transcription factors (TFs) and of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Besides membrane-based stress perception, physical stimuli such as thermal stress can be sensed at subcellular locations where disruption of the structure–function relationship of biomolecules occurs.

Given the advancement of next-generation sequencing and its much-reduced cost per base, whole-genome sequencing has become more feasible. The unprecedented chemical diversity of terpenoids is commensurate to the genetic diversity of TPSs found in plant genomes (Figure 2). TPS genes were annotated in different numbers, from 29 potentially functional TPS genes in tomato to 69 putatively functional TPS genes in grapevine. Enzyme analysis has shown that the emergence of species-specific clades of TPS genes was brought about by neofunctionalization and gene duplication. TPS genes are classified into seven distinct subfamilies/clades, i.e., TPSa, TPSb, TPSc, TPSd, TPSe/f, TPSg, and TPSh. These subfamilies are mainly discriminated based on the presence and modifications of their N- and C-terminal motifs R(R)X8W and D(D)X(X)(D)D, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of TPS protein families based on PFAM PF01397 and PF03936 illustrates that there is a preferential representation of particular TPS subfamilies (TPSa, TPSb, TPSc, TPSe/f, and TPSg, Figure 2). Thus far, no genome has been found to host all seven subfamilies of TPS. These TPSs have also undergone lineage-specific expansion wherein each species on average has only 1–2 subfamilies of TPS with probably at least 100 members. Apart from classical plant TPS, microbial TPS-like (MTPSL) exists in non-vascular plants including bryophytes, merchantiophytes, anthocerotophytes, and algae.

A recent study has attempted to include DXS genes in TPS gene families, suggesting that duplication of DXS and TPS gene families may lead to the separation of biological features in terpenoids production, and overexpression of these genes may result in the production of major component of terpenes. In many plant genomes, CYP450 and TPS gene pairs are juxtaposed right next to each other (Figure 3). Integrated analysis of gene co-expression identified two CYP450 genes, namely, CYP88D6 and CYP72A154, involved in the triterpenoid saponin glycyrrhizin pathway. In Arabidopsis, CYP76C1 acts as linalool metabolizing oxygenase and was found to be co-expressed with TPS10 and TPS14. In addition to the diverse TPS genes, oxidation provided by enzymes of the CYP450 superfamily gives rise to a variety of terpenoid products.

1.3. Effects of Plant Terpenes on Abiotic Stress

VTs mitigate the effects of oxidative stress by modulating the oxidative status of plants, and the volatile emission profile could be one of the signature responses of a plant under stress conditions. Considering that there is a convergence of various stress pathways at the level of oxidative signaling, it has been proposed that protection against abiotic stress is mediated through direct reactions of terpenoids with oxidants either intracellularly or at the leaf–atmosphere interface/boundary layer, membrane stabilization, and indirect alteration of ROS signaling. For instance, thermal stress induces membrane destabilization of the thylakoid membrane, resulting in fragmentation of the membrane and disintegration of protein complexes (e.g., PSII). It is hypothesized that, due to the amphipathic nature of isoprene, they could alleviate stress by transiently inserting in the membrane, which enhances hydrophobic interactions of large protein complexes between themselves or with membrane lipids. On the other hand, membrane-bound antioxidants such as tocopherol and carotenoids (zeaxanthin, neoxanthin, and lutein) may directly scavenge ROS in response to photoinhibition.

The photosynthetic output is compromised under certain abiotic stresses. Plants have adapted a mechanism to re-focus resources to more important pathways, and it is hypothesized that VTs together with phytohormones are key players in this process called premature or stress-induced senescence. This is a coping mechanism whereby plants economize available resources. A study has proposed that during abiotic stress, VT production is upregulated by re-routing resources to the MEP pathway and, together with phytohormones, may promote plant senescence and organ abscission. Production of VTs is considered a substantial and irretrievable investment for plants; however, even if photosynthesis is inhibited, VT production and emission are sustained, suggesting they are beneficial to plants under stress conditions. Under one or more abiotic stresses, plants may eventually undergo stress-induced senescence. An article has also proposed that abiotic stress induces VT production and emission, which initiate signaling pathways leading to senescence, apoptosis, and abscission in plants. Senescence in Arabidopsis is induced by citral, peppermint, β-pinene, α-pinene, and camphene. Plants gamble to ensure survival by diverting resources from older organs to synthesize stress-combating secondary metabolites. A correlation has been reported in Salvia mirzayanni where increased production of monoterpenoids (1,8-cineole, α-terpinyl acetate, and linalyl acetate) resulted in a subsequent decrease of photosynthetic productivity (rate, stomatal conductance, internal CO2 partial pressure, and transpiration). This observation suggests a resource partitioning that diverts more carbon to secondary metabolite synthesis. Furthermore, an interesting observation during plant senescence of expended leaves is that, while they become more prone to aphid infestation, re-allocation of resources could oppose the ability of aphids to otherwise redirect the flow of photosynthates to them. It could be that re-routing of nutrients and secondary metabolites makes the leaves less deterring to herbivores because of infestation by making it a bountiful source of nutrient leftovers. While this is a compromise that plants have to make, most plants can reverse the process once the environmental conditions become favorable. Abiotic stress-associated terpenes and terpenoids currently known are listed in Table 1.

2.1. Terpenoids with Toxic and/or Repellent Effects on Insects

Terpenoids are also known to mediate plant–insect (e.g., pollinators, predators, parasitoids, and herbivores) interactions. Generally, the interactions work to the benefit of the plants and to the detriment of herbivores. These interactions are assumed to be mediated by the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) including, but not limited to, terpenoids, albeit the fact that a substantial fraction of the VOC consists of terpenoids. The characteristics of VOC mixture are believed depend on the identity and proportion of individual components, and attacking herbivores are sensitive to a particular blends of VOC. The emitted VOC may include one or few with toxic, deterring/repellent, or attractive properties.

Cinnamon and clove essential oils are toxic and repellent to Sitophilus granaries, an important grain pest. In addition to these two essential oils, five toxic terpenoids were proposed, i.e., eugenol (considered a terpenoid in that study but not in other works), caryophyllene oxide, α-pinene, α-humulene, and α-phellandrene. Eugenol shows the strongest contact toxicity. It was found that less damage was caused by Paropsisterna tigrina adults in Melalecua alternifolia, in the presence of a high concentration of terpinolene. In addition, volatiles containing the same terpenoids present in intact and infested rice plants attract or repel the rice pest Orseolia oryzivora depending on their concentrations Table 2 summarizes examples from relevant studies.

Unlike terpenoids directly targeting insect pests, terpenoids can act as elicitors to trigger defense mechanisms to pests in plants. Overexpressed β-ocimene from tobacco triggered a high release of methyl salicylate and cis-3-hexen-1-ol in tomato, both of which are proposed to cause impairment of aphid development and reproduction, increasing the defense ability of tomato against aphids.

2.2. Terpenoids as Attractants to Predators or Parasitoids

Attracting predators or parasitoids is an effective indirect defense adopted by plants against herbivores. Chrysopa phyllochroma Waesmael is a promising bio-control candidate as polyphagous predator. It is reported that (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenol, (3E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene, and linalool effectively attract C. phyllochroma at specific concentrations, while (3E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene and linalool can enhance C. phyllochroma female’s ability to parasitoidism. The compound 1,8-cineole, which is a volatile monoterpene cyclic ether, can be used as an insecticide. However, the same terpenoid contained in VOCs from cabbage plants attracts the parasitoids Cotesia glomerata that lay eggs in Pieris brassicae, a caterpillar of specific herbivores. It was reported that the extent of damage caused by these larvae is commensurate to the upregulation of the biosynthesis of the VOC blend. Iso-pinocarveol is proposed to potentially act as a recruiter of parasitoids in addition to having toxic properties (Table 2).

Similarly, plant–plant interactions through VTs demonstrates that tomato is induced to release a high level of methyl salicylate and cis-3-hexen-1-ol to attract parasitoids of aphids on exposure to β-ocimene released by neighboring/adjacent tobacco plants.

2.3. Terpenoids as Attractants to Herbivores

By contrast, unlike those terpenoids potentially involved in the defense against infesting herbivores, some terpenoids act as chemo-attractants to herbivores. This property can be exploited in pest management strategies to intentionally lure herbivores into a trap. Planting transgenic plants overexpressing attractants may effectively lure herbivores into entrapments that prevent escape. This strategy could be particularly useful or practical in mitigating and managing the agricultural and economic impacts of these unwanted insect pests. A study has demonstrated an important association between increased γ-terpinene and α-pinene production in Eucalyptus grandis and its subsequent susceptibility to pest infestation, indicating the potential utility of these terpenes as attractants to E. grandis pest Leptocybe invasa, or a potential decoy/trap when expressed in non-host plant species.

2.4. Plant Terpenes with Beneficiaries

Owing to their diversity, terpene products not only provide plants with adaptative strategies for various environmental conditions but also bring benefits especially to long-term cooperators such as pollinators. The above mentioned 1,8-cineole, which can be used as an insecticide, can be tolerated by orchid bees (Euglossinae, e.g., Eulaema, Eufriesea, Euglossa). Male orchid bees are well known fragrance collectors, sensing undiluted 1,8-cineole directly from the flowers of several neotropical orchid genera and species of Dalechampia during pollination. This monoterpene was reported to be stored in males’ hind leg pouches and later exposed during courtship. On the other hand, female bee species (Apidae: Euglossini), Hypanthidium (Megachilidae: Anthidiini), and worker Trigona (Apidae: Meliponini) utilize triterpene resins (mixtures of β-amyrin, β-amyrone, dammadienol, and dammadienone) collected from flowers of some Dalechampia species as nest construction materials and pollinate these flowers during collection.. While the same resin compound has an inhibitory effect towards generalists and specialized herbivores, it is an example of species-specific reward to beneficiaries. Other than providing terpenes as a reward to pollinators, some flowers provide a nursery ground (the flower itself) to the pollinators. Terpene compounds serve as a cue for pollinators to locate their specific host. In the case of the noctuid moths Hadena bicruris, these insects are attracted by lilac aldehydes which are the main components of the scent of Silene latifolia.

Terpene compounds can be finely adjusted to a certain concentration to repel or attract pollinators. Pollination of male and female Macrozamia lucida is sort artistic. Thrips (Cycadothrips chadwick), the pollinators, are retained in the male cone early in the morning. During midday, after the temperature of the male cone changes, volatile emission increases tremendously (female cone emission is 1/5 of that of male cone). Under such a high concentration of volatile compounds which contain three terpenes (β-myrcene, (E)-β ocimene, and allo-ocimene), the thrips are repelled from the cones. Later, the thrips are attracted to the female cone and finish the whole pollination as they are attracted by a low emission of terpenes, especially β-myrcene.

Research studies have also revealed that terpenes serve as signals for pollinators to identify floral stages. In the species-specific relationship between fig (Ficus hispida) and wasp (Ceratosolen solmsi marchali), the pollinator needs to identify the female floral stage because it is the only stage receptive to pollinators. Three monoterpenes, namely, linalool, limonene, and β-pinene, can be found in receptive fig volatiles. Wasps are responsive to both quantity (change in concentration) and quality (substitution with different isomers), but quality does matter regarding locating the host and floral stage differentiation.

Peperomia macrostachya produces seeds that attract arboreal in nutrient-rich formicaries. This species-specific symbiosis is called neotropical ant-gardens (AGs). The seeds emit numerous phenolic and terpenoid volatiles including geranyl linalool. This terpenoid can be perceived by the seed-dispersal partner AG ant species Camponotus femoratus; as a result, these ants are attracted to the location of the scent. This scent is rather toxic to most insect species. This explains why this plant is distributed largely around AG ant nests.

3. Potential Agricultural Biotechnology Applications

Terpenoids play vital roles in different biological processes, not only for plant defenses but also for insect development. Sesquiterpenoids of insects include the well-known farnesoic acid (FA), methyl farnesoate (MF), and juvenile hormone (JH). The production of sesquiterpenoids in both plants and insects starts with the formation of the C5 building units IPP and DMAPP by the mevalonate (MVA) pathway and the alternate plastidial methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway in plants. The C5 building units are further assembled into farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) and modified into C15 sesquiterpenoid products with the help of different TPSs. Yet, diversity can be found in the production of sesquiterpenoids. For instance, different groups of insects use different pathways to produce JH. While most insects like cockroaches and locust utilize epoxidase CYP15A1 to produce JH, lepidopterans first convert FA to JH-III acid with epoxidase CYP15C1 and subsequently use juvenile hormone acid O-methyltransferase (JHAMT) to form JH. Besides its role in regulating various endogenous processes, JH is also involved in mediating insect responses to the environment. For instance, in response to seasonal changes of the photoperiod, aphids switch their reproductive mode between parthenogenesis and sexual reproduction, during which, JH appears to have a role, because transcriptome analysis found that genes (JH acid methyltransferase, JH binding protein-like, circadian clock-controlled protein) responsible for JH synthesis and transport are down-regulated when days are short. Despite the similar chemical structures of terpenoids in plants and sesquiterpenoids in insects, there are currently no studies showing a direct crosstalk between the two kingdoms.

Nevertheless, terpenoids that attract herbivores could also function as bioherbicides allowing management of weed growth in paddies or any agricultural fields. Altica cyanea females are attracted by elevated emissions of the volatile blend from damaged Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) Raven (Onagraceae), a rice-field weed, in which four terpenoids were identified, i.e., α-pinene, linalool oxide, geraniol, and phytol. To keep pests away, about 20 years ago a project proposed to transfer the (S)-limonene synthase gene from wildflower Clarkia breweri to petunia. Linalool, which can repel aphids, successfully increased. A similar overexpression of linalool synthase gene from strawberry in chrysanthemum also decreases the tendency of thrips and aphids to attack the transgenic plants with respect control plants. Metabolic engineering involved the strawberry FaNES1 (Fragaria ananassa Nerolidol Synthase 1) gene expressed in other crops such as potato. FaNES1 recombinant protein catalyzes the formation of S-linalool, resulting in a much higher level of linalool. Interestingly, targeting the FaNES1 protein in the mitochondria of transgenic Arabidopsis rather than the protein in plastid can lead to a higher yield of the sesquiterpene nerolidol The homoterpene derivative of nerolidol known as 4,8-dimethyl-1,3(E),7-nonatriene further contributes to plant defense by attracting insect herbivores predators. Another indirect defense example of maize, listed in the above Table 2, consisted in inducing the sesquiterpene synthase gene (TPS10) from maize into Arabidopsis to help the female parasitoid wasp C. marginiventris to locate the host caterpillars. Genetically modified crops can be more attractive to pollinators due to their richness in terpene compounds. Comparing Cry3Bb-expressing genetically modified (GM) eggplants and their near-isogenic control, the GM eggplant contains an abundant amount of terpenes, such as (+)-limonene, Z-jasmone, p-cymene, α-pinene, and (−)-limonene, which explains the increased visitation by the commercial pollinator bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). With nanotechnology, encapsulated terpenoids can be used to trap insect pests. A study evaluated and proposed a potential system to trap Bemisia tabaci through attraction by geraniol encapsulated in chitosan/gum Arabic nanoparticles.

Other than promoting crop yield through weed control, pest management, and pollination, one of the direct impacts on agriculture by mustering terpenoid biosynthesis is to enhance or alter the scents and flavors of products. There are cases of increased production of monoterpenes in transgenic plants such as tomato, carnation, potato, mint, and tobacco by overexpressing the corresponding TPS genes or CYP450 genes or regulating TFs, promoters, etc.. The same goes for medicinal plants. A sesquiterpene (artemisinin) produced by Artemisia annua is regarded as an effective therapy against malaria-causing Plasmodium falciparum strains. Artemisinin biosynthesis can be upregulated via two TFs (AaERF1 and AaERF2) belonging to the AP2/ERF family. More engineering approaches such as suppressing the metabolic pathways that compete with the biosynthetic pathways of terpenoid or regulating endogenous phytohormones can be adopted to adjust terpenoid production in response to the challenging agriculture environment.

Abiotic stresses including drought, flooding, changes in salinity, heat, cold, and high irradiance have caused a decline in plant primary production and crop losses worldwide. Hence, mitigating the negative impacts of these factors is imperative to address pressing issues regarding food quality and security. Considering the important roles of terpenoids in the abiotic stress response, metabolic engineering towards a more stable and efficient production of volatile and essential terpenoids may provide a long-term solution. Metabolic engineering of plant terpenoids has been reviewed, and while increasing the production of terpenoids is the desired ultimate goal, it comes with a cost, particularly because of the possibility of perturbing cellular homeostasis. Thus, it is equally important to consider a different paradigm in this matter. A preferential increase in precursor flux in one pathway might inadvertently deplete other pathways with shared precursors needed for the production of equally essential metabolites, and unregulated production of volatile terpenes may lead to cytotoxicity. In retrospect, the key role of phytohormones in plant defense and stress responses is widely recognized. These hormones activate stress signaling in a global manner, culminating with an integrated stress response including, but not limited to, increased production of volatile terpenes. A proportionate regulation of biochemical pathways in response to changing environmental conditions is intuitively less stressful and perturbing to plants that are already experiencing stress. Hence, modifying the production of stress-associated phytohormones and modulating their potentiating effect on the stress response may provide a more suitable alternative to increasing volatile terpene production, while keeping any adverse effect that might spontaneously arise at bay.

4. Conclusions

The interactions between plants, environment, and insects are inevitable. Secondary metabolites, particularly the emitted volatile organic compounds and volatile terpenes, are implicated in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Terpenoids, in particular, have key roles in alleviating abiotic stresses, in mitigating herbivore infestation, and in mediating communications with third-party beneficial species such as those involved in tritrophic and multitrophic interactions. Plant–insect interactions represent a perpetual arms race, a continuous process of out-smarting one another. This process has resulted into an unprecedented diversity of terpenes and terpenoids in both plants and insects. How to get a thorough understanding of their dynamic interactions and how to make an appropriate use of them in biotechnology are questions that will need to be tackled in this coming decade.

References 115

  1. 1.

    Gershenzon J., Dudareva N. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:408-414.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.2007.5

  2. 2.

    Nagel R., Schmidt A., Peters R.J. Isoprenyl diphosphate synthases: The chain length determining step in terpene biosynthesis. Planta. 2018;249:9-20.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-018-3052-1

  3. 3.

    Dudareva N., Pichersky E., Gershenzon J. Biochemistry of Plant Volatiles1. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1893-1902.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.104.049981

  4. 4.

    Dudareva N., Negre F., Nagegowda D.A., Orlova I., Negre-Zakharov F. Plant Volatiles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2006;25:417-440.

    Not in our library10.1080/07352680600899973

  5. 5.

    Yazaki K., Arimura G.-I., Ohnishi T. ‘Hidden’ Terpenoids in Plants: Their Biosynthesis, Localization and Ecological Roles. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58:1615-1621.

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcx123

  6. 6.

    Holopainen J.K., Himanen S.J., Yuan J.S., Chen F., Stewart C.N. Ecological Functions of Terpenoids in Changing Climates. Natural Products. 2013;2913-2940.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Pazouki L., Niinemets Ü. Multi-Substrate Terpene Synthases: Their Occurrence and Physiological Significance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1019.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2016.01019

  8. 8.

    Christianson D.W. Structural and Chemical Biology of Terpenoid Cyclases. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:11570-11648.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00287

  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Zhu J.-K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell. 2016;167:313-324.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029

  12. 12.

    Hamann T. Plant cell wall integrity maintenance as an essential component of biotic stress response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2012;3:77.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2012.00077

  13. 13.

    Tuteja N., Sopory S.K. Plant signaling in stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008;3:79-86.

    Not in our library10.4161/psb.3.2.5303

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Jia Q., Köllner T.G., Gershenzon J., Chen F. MTPSLs: New Terpene Synthases in Nonseed Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:121-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.014

  16. 16.

    Alicandri E., Paolacci A.R., Osadolor S., Sorgonà A., Badiani M., Ciaffi M. On the Evolution and Functional Diversity of Terpene Synthases in the Pinus Species: A Review. J. Mol. Evol. 2020;88:253-283.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00239-020-09930-8

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Falara V., Akhtar T.A., Nguyen T.T., Spyropoulou E.A., Bleeker P.M., Schauvinhold I., Matsuba Y., Bonini M.E., Schilmiller A.L., Last R.L., et al. The Tomato Terpene Synthase Gene Family. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:770-789.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.179648

  19. 19.

    Beran F., Köllner T.G., Gershenzon J., Tholl D. Chemical convergence between plants and insects: Biosynthetic origins and functions of common secondary metabolites. New Phytol. 2019;223:52-67.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.15718

  20. 20.

    Jiang S.-Y., Jin J., Sarojam R., Ramachandran S. A Comprehensive Survey on the Terpene Synthase Gene Family Provides New Insight into Its Evolutionary Patterns. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019;11:2078-2098.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evz142

  21. 21.

    Chen F., Tholl D., Bohlmann J., Pichersky E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011;66:212-229.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04520.x

  22. 22.

    Chen Y.-C., Li Z., Zhao Y.-X., Gao M., Wang J.-Y., Liu K.-W., Wang X., Wu L.-W., Jiao Y.-L., Xu Z.-L., et al. The Litsea genome and the evolution of the laurel family. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-15493-5

  23. 23.

    Boutanaev A.M., Moses T., Zi J., Nelson D.R., Mugford S.T., Peters R.J., Osbourn A. Investigation of terpene diversification across multiple sequenced plant genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;112:E81-E88.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1419547112

  24. 24.

    Tohge T., Fernie A.R. Co-regulation of Clustered and Neo-functionalized Genes in Plant-Specialized Metabolism. Plants. 2020;9:622.

    Not in our library10.3390/plants9050622

  25. 25.

    Seki H., Sawai S., Ohyama K., Mizutani M., Ohnishi T., Sudo H., Fukushima E.O., Akashi T., Aoki T., Saito K., et al. Triterpene Functional Genomics in Licorice for Identification of CYP72A154 Involved in the Biosynthesis of Glycyrrhizin. Plant Cell. 2011;23:4112-4123.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.110.082685

  26. 26.

    Boachon B., Junker R.R., Miesch L., Bassard J.-E., Höfer R., Caillieaudeaux R., Seidel D., Lesot A., Heinrich C.F., Ginglinger J.-F., et al. CYP76C1 (Cytochrome P450)-Mediated Linalool Metabolism and the Formation of Volatile and Soluble Linalool Oxides in Arabidopsis Flowers: A Strategy for Defense against Floral Antagonists. Plant Cell. 2015;27:2972-2990.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.15.00399

  27. 27.

    Gururani M.A., Venkatesh J., Tran L.-S.P. Regulation of Photosynthesis during Abiotic Stress-Induced Photoinhibition. Mol. Plant. 2015;8:1304-1320.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.005

  28. 28.

    Wang Q., Quan S., Xiao H. Towards efficient terpenoid biosynthesis: Manipulating IPP and DMAPP supply. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2019;6:6.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40643-019-0242-z

  29. 29.

    Vickers C.E., Gershenzon J., Lerdau M., Loreto F. A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009;5:283-291.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.158

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Guindon S., Dufayard J.-F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307-321.

    Not in our library10.1093/sysbio/syq010

  32. 32.

    Lefort V., Longueville J.-E., Gascuel O. SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34:2422-2424.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msx149

  33. 33.

    Priya P., Yadav A., Chand J., Yadav G. Terzyme: A tool for identification and analysis of the plant terpenome. Plant Methods. 2018;14:4.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13007-017-0269-0

  34. 34.

    Subramanian B., Gao S., Lercher M.J., Hu S., Chen W.-H. Evolview v3: A webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W270-W275.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz357

  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Blande J.D., Holopainen J.K., Niinemets Ü. Plant volatiles in polluted atmospheres: Stress responses and signal degradation. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37:1892-1904.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.12352

  37. 37.

    Sharkey T.D., Yeh S. Isoprene emission from plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2001;52:407-436.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.407

  38. 38.

    Goh C.-H., Ko S.-M., Koh S., Kim Y.-J., Bae H.-J. Photosynthesis and Environments: Photoinhibition and Repair Mechanisms in Plants. J. Plant Biol. 2011;55:93-101.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12374-011-9195-2

  39. 39.

    Havaux M., Eymery F., Porfirova S., Rey P., Dörmann P. Vitamin E Protects against Photoinhibition and Photooxidative Stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3451-3469.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.037036

  40. 40.
  41. 41.

    Dall’Osto L., Fiore A., Cazzaniga S., Giuliano G., Bassi R. Different Roles of - and -Branch Xanthophylls in Photosystem Assembly and Photoprotection. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:35056-35068.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m704729200

  42. 42.

    Peng L., Ma J., Chi W., Guo J., Zhu S., Lu Q., Lu C., Zhang L.-X. Low Psii Accumulation1 Is Involved in Efficient Assembly of Photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2006;18:955-969.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.037689

  43. 43.

    Korankye E.A., Lada R.R., Asiedu S., Caldwell C. Plant Senescence: The Role of Volatile Terpene Compounds (VTCs). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2017;8:3120-3139.

    Not in our library10.4236/ajps.2017.812211

  44. 44.

    Pegadaraju V., Knepper C., Reese J., Shah J. Premature Leaf Senescence Modulated by the Arabidopsis PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 Gene Is Associated with Defense against the Phloem-Feeding Green Peach Aphid. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:1927-1934.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.105.070433

  45. 45.

    Sade N., Rubio-Wilhelmi M.D.M., Umnajkitikorn K., Blumwald E. Stress-induced senescence and plant tolerance to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2017;69:845-853.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erx235

  46. 46.

    Romagni J.G., Allen S.N., Dayan E.F. Allelopathic Effects of Volatile Cineoles on Two Weedy Plant Species. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000;26:303-313.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1005414216848

  47. 47.

    Chaimovitsh D., Abu-Abied M., Belausov E., Rubin B., Dudai N., Sadot E. Microtubules are an intracellular target of the plant terpene citral. Plant J. 2010;61:399-408.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04063.x

  48. 48.

    Valifard M., Mohsenzadeh S., Kholdebarin B., Rowshan V., Niazi A., Moghadam A. Effect of salt stress on terpenoid biosynthesis in Salvia mirzayanii: From gene to metabolite. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018;94:389-399.

    Not in our library10.1080/14620316.2018.1505443

  49. 49.

    Balazadeh S., Schildhauer J., Araújo W.L., Munné-Bosch S., Fernie A.R., Proost S., Humbeck K., Mueller-Roeber B. Reversal of senescence by N resupply to N-starved Arabidopsis thaliana: Transcriptomic and metabolomic consequences. J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:3975-3992.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/eru119

  50. 50.

    Palmer-Young E.C., Veit D., Gershenzon J., Schuman M.C. The Sesquiterpenes(E)-ß-Farnesene and (E)-α-Bergamotene Quench Ozone but Fail to Protect the Wild Tobacco Nicotiana attenuata from Ozone, UVB, and Drought Stresses. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0127296.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0127296

  51. 51.

    Loreto F. Ozone Quenching Properties of Isoprene and Its Antioxidant Role in Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:993-1000.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.126.3.993

  52. 52.

    Shu Y., Atkinson R. Rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of O3 with a series of Terpenes and OH radical formation from the O3 reactions with Sesquiterpenes at 296 ± 2 K. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1994;26:1193-1205.

    Not in our library10.1002/kin.550261207

  53. 53.

    Lee G.W., Lee S., Chung M.-S., Jeong Y.S., Chung B.Y. Rice terpene synthase 20 (OsTPS20) plays an important role in producing terpene volatiles in response to abiotic stresses. Protoplasma. 2014;252:997-1007.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-014-0735-8

  54. 54.

    Bertamini M., Grando M.S., Zocca P., Pedrotti M., Lorenzi S., Cappellin L. Linking monoterpenes and abiotic stress resistance in grapevines. BIO Web Conf. 2019;13:01003.

    Not in our library10.1051/bioconf/20191301003

  55. 55.

    Kleiber A., Duan Q., Jansen K., Junker L.V., Kammerer B., Rennenberg H., Ensminger I., Gessler A., Kreuzwieser J. Drought effects on root and needle terpenoid content of a coastal and an interior Douglas fir provenance. Tree Physiol. 2017;37:1648-1658.

    Not in our library10.1093/treephys/tpx113

  56. 56.

    Vaughan M.M., Christensen S., Schmelz E.A., Huffaker A., McAuslane H.J., Alborn H.T., Romero M., Allen L.H., Teal P.E.A. Accumulation of terpenoid phytoalexins in maize roots is associated with drought tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:2195-2207.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.12482

  57. 57.

    Munné-Bosch S., Alegre L. Drought-Induced Changes in the Redox State of α-Tocopherol, Ascorbate, and the Diterpene Carnosic Acid in Chloroplasts of Labiatae Species Differing in Carnosic Acid Contents1. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1816-1825.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.102.019265

  58. 58.

    Plata-Rueda A., Campos J.M., Rolim G.D.S., Martínez L.C., Dos Santos M.H., Fernandes F.L., Serrão J.E., Zanuncio J.C. Terpenoid constituents of cinnamon and clove essential oils cause toxic effects and behavior repellency response on granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;156:263-270.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.033

  59. 59.

    Bustos-Segura C., Kulheim C., Foley W.J. Effects of Terpene Chemotypes of Melaleuca alternifolia on Two Specialist Leaf Beetles and Susceptibility to Myrtle Rust. J. Chem. Ecol. 2015;41:937-947.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10886-015-0628-0

  60. 60.

    Ogah E.O., Smart L.E., Woodcock C.M., Caulfield J.C., Birkett M.A., Pickett J.A., Nwilene F.E., Bruce T.J.A. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of female African rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzivora Harris and Gagné, to host plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016;43:13-16.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10886-016-0788-6

  61. 61.

    Cascone P., Iodice L., Maffei M.E., Bossi S., Arimura G.-I., Guerrieri E. Tobacco overexpressing β-ocimene induces direct and indirect responses against aphids in receiver tomato plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2015;173:28-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.011

  62. 62.

    Dodson C.H., Dressler R.L., Hills H.G., Adams R.M., Williams N.H. Biologically Active Compounds in Orchid Fragrances. Science. 1969;164:1243-1249.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.164.3885.1243

  63. 63.

    Armbruster W.S. Reproductive Interactions Between Sympatric Dalechampia Species: Are Natural Assemblages “Random” or Organized? Ecology. 1986;67:522-533.

    Not in our library10.2307/1938595

  64. 64.

    Armbruster W.S., Herzig A.L. Partitioning and Sharing of Pollinators by Four Sympatric Species of Dalechampia (Euphorbiaceae) in Panama. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1984;71:1.

    Not in our library10.2307/2399053

  65. 65.

    Armbruster W.S., Steiner K.E. Pollination Ecology of Four Dalechampia Species (Euphorbiaceae) in Northern Natal, South Africa. Am. J. Bot. 1992;79:306.

    Not in our library10.2307/2445020

  66. 66.

    Nieuwenhuizen N.J., Wang M.Y., Matich A.J., Green S.A., Chen X., Yauk Y.-K., Beuning L.L., Nagegowda D.A., Dudareva N., Atkinson R.G. Two terpene synthases are responsible for the major sesquiterpenes emitted from the flowers of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J. Exp. Bot. 2009;60:3203-3219.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp162

  67. 67.

    Dötterl S., Jurgens A., Seifert K., Laube T., Weissbecker B., Schutz S. Nursery pollination by a moth in Silene latifolia: The role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses. New Phytol. 2006;169:707-718.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01509.x

  68. 68.

    Terry I., Walter G.H., Moore C., Roemer R., Hull C. Odor-Mediated Push-Pull Pollination in Cycads. Science. 2007;318:70.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1145147

  69. 69.

    Chen C., Song Q. Responses of the Pollinating Wasp Ceratosolen solmsi marchali to Odor Variation Between Two Floral Stages of Ficus hispida. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008;34:1536-1544.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10886-008-9558-4

  70. 70.

    Byers K.J.R.P., Bradshaw H.D., Riffell J.A. Three floral volatiles contribute to differential pollinator attraction in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). J. Exp. Biol. 2013;217:614-623.

    Not in our library10.1242/jeb.092213

  71. 71.

    Majetic C.J., Raguso R.A., Ashman T.-L. The sweet smell of success: Floral scent affects pollinator attraction and seed fitness inHesperis matronalis. Funct. Ecol. 2009;23:480-487.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01517.x

  72. 72.

    Dobson H. Relationship between Floral Fragrance Composition and Type of Pollinator. Biology of Floral Scent. 2006;147-198.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    Nagnan P., Clement J.-L., Lange C., Peru L., Basselier J.-J. Geranyllinalool (Diterpene Alcohol). J. Chem. Ecol. 1990;16:2067-2079.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01020517

  74. 74.

    Youngsteadt E., Baca J.A., Osborne J., Schal C. Species-Specific Seed Dispersal in an Obligate Ant-Plant Mutualism. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4335.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0004335

  75. 75.

    Ahuja I., Rohloff J., Bones A.M. Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: Implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010;30:311-348.

    Not in our library10.1051/agro/2009025

  76. 76.

    Dicke M., Van Loon J.J.A., De Jong P.W. Ecogenomics Benefits Community Ecology. Science. 2004;305:618-619.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1101788

  77. 77.

    Turlings T.C.J., Benrey B. Effect of plant metabolites on the behavior and development of parasitic wasp. Ecoscience. 1998;5:321-333.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    Wegener R., Schulz S., Meiners T., Hadwich K., Hilker M. Analysis of volatiles induced by oviposition of elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola on Ulmus minor. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001;27:499-515.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1010397107740

  79. 79.

    Wegener R., Schulz S. Identification and synthesis of homoterpenoids emitted from elm leaves after elicitation by beetle eggs. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:315-319.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0040-4020(01)01149-8

  80. 80.

    Xu X., Cai X., Bian L., Luo Z., Xin Z., Chen Z. Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Chrysopa phyllochroma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Plant Volatiles. Environ. Èntomol. 2015;44:1425-1433.

    Not in our library10.1093/ee/nvv106

  81. 81.

    Berkov A., Purzycki K.L., Meurer-Grimes B. Do Lecythidaceae Specialists (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Shun Fetid Tree Species? Biotropica. 2000;32:440-451.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00491.x

  82. 82.

    Li H., Li J., Dong Y., Hao H., Ling Z., Bai H., Wang H., Cui H., Shi L. Time-series transcriptome provides insights into the gene regulation network involved in the volatile terpenoid metabolism during the flower development of lavender. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:313.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12870-019-1908-6

  83. 83.

    Da Costa C.P., Jones C.M., Breedlove J.R., Trammell G.T. Cucumber Beetle Resistance and Mite Susceptibility Controlled by the Bitter Gene in Cucumis sativus L. Science. 1971;172:1145-1146.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.172.3988.1145

  84. 84.

    Balkema-Boomstra A.G., Zijlstra S., Verstappen F.W.A., Inggamer H., Mercke P.E., Jongsma M.A., Bouwmeester H. Role of Cucurbitacin C in Resistance to Spider Mite (Tetranychus urticae) in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 2003;29:225-235.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1021945101308

  85. 85.

    Mitra S., Karmakar A., Mukherjee A., Barik A. The Role of Leaf Volatiles of Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) Raven in the Attraction of Altica cyanea (Weber) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 2017;43:679-692.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10886-017-0866-4

  86. 86.

    Naidoo S., Christie N., Acosta J.J., Mphahlele M.M., Payn K.G., Myburg A.A., Kulheim C. Terpenes associated with resistance against the gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa, in Eucalyptus grandis. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:1840-1851.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.13323

  87. 87.

    Oliveira J.L., Campos E.V.R., Pereira A.D.E.S., Nunes L.E.S., Da Silva C.C.L., Pasquoto T., De Lima R., Smaniotto G., Polanczyk R.A., Fraceto L.F. Geraniol Encapsulated in Chitosan/Gum Arabic Nanoparticles: A Promising System for Pest Management in Sustainable Agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018;66:5325-5334.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00331

  88. 88.

    Aprotosoaie A.C., Luca V.S., Trifan A., Miron A. Antigenotoxic Potential of Some Dietary Non-phenolic Phytochemicals. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 2019.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Zimmermann Y., Roubik D.W., Eltz T. Species-specific attraction to pheromonal analogues in orchid bees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2006;60:833-843.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00265-006-0227-8

  90. 90.

    Armbruster W.S. Evolution of Plant Pollination Systems: Hypotheses and Tests with the Neotropical Vinedalechampia. Evolytion. 1993;47:1480-1505.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02170.x

  91. 91.

    Armbruster W.S., Howard J.J., Clausen T.P., Debevec E.M., Loquvam J.C., Matsuki M., Cerendolo B., Andel F. Do Biochemical Exaptations Link Evolution of Plant Defense and Pollination Systems? Historical Hypotheses and Experimental Tests with Dalechampia Vines. Am. Nat. 1997;149:461-484.

    Not in our library10.1086/286000

  92. 92.

    Cheong S.P.S., Huang J., Bendena W.G., Tobe S.S., Hui J.H. Evolution of Ecdysis and Metamorphosis in Arthropods: The Rise of Regulation of Juvenile Hormone. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2015;55:878-890.

    Not in our library10.1093/icb/icv066

  93. 93.

    Qu Z., Bendena W.G., Tobe S.S., Hui J.H. Juvenile hormone and sesquiterpenoids in arthropods: Biosynthesis, signaling, and role of MicroRNA. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018;184:69-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.01.013

  94. 94.

    Yu F., Utsumi R. Diversity, regulation, and genetic manipulation of plant mono- and sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009;66:3043-3052.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-009-0066-7

  95. 95.

    Degenhardt J., Köllner T.G., Gershenzon J. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of terpene skeletal diversity in plants. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1621-1637.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.030

  96. 96.

    Tsang S.S.K., Law S.T.S., Li C., Qu Z., Bendena W.G., Tobe S.S., Hui J.H.L. Diversity of Insect Sesquiterpenoid Regulation. Front. Genet. 2020;11:1-13.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2020.01027

  97. 97.

    Marchal E., Zhang J., Badisco L., Everlinden H., Hult E.F., Van Wielendaele P., Yagi K.J., Tobe S.S., Broeck J.V. Final steps in juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;41:219-227.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.12.007

  98. 98.
  99. 99.

    Le Trionnaire G., Jaubert-Possamai S., Bonhomme J., Gauthier J.-P., Guernec G., Le Cam A., Legeai F., Monfort J., Tagu D. Transcriptomic profiling of the reproductive mode switch in the pea aphid in response to natural autumnal photoperiod. J. Insect Physiol. 2012;58:1517-1524.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.07.009

  100. 100.

    Lücker J., Blaas J., Bouwmeester H., Schwab W., Van Der Plas L.H.W., Verhoeven H.A. Expression of Clarkia S-linalool synthase in transgenic petunia plants results in the accumulation of S-linalyl-?-d-glucopyranoside. Plant J. 2001;27:315-324.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01097.x

  101. 101.

    Jongsma M.A. Novel Genes for Control and Deterrence of Sucking Insect Pests. ISB News Rep. 2004;1-4.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    Aharoni A., Jongsma M.A., Kim T.-Y., Ri M.-B., Giri A.P., Verstappen F.W.A., Schwab W., Bouwmeester H. Metabolic Engineering of Terpenoid Biosynthesis in Plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2006;5:49-58.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11101-005-3747-3

  103. 103.

    Aharoni A., Giri A.P., Deuerlein S., Griepink F., De Kogel W.-J., Verstappen F.W.A., Verhoeven H.A., Jongsma M.A., Schwab W., Bouwmeester H. Terpenoid Metabolism in Wild-Type and Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2866-2884.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.016253

  104. 104.

    Bouwmeester H.J., Verstappen F.W., Posthumus M.A., Dicke M. Spider Mite-Induced (3S)-(E)-Nerolidol Synthase Activity in Cucumber and Lima Bean. The First Dedicated Step in Acyclic C11-Homoterpene Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:173-180.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.121.1.173

  105. 105.

    Schnee C., Köllner T.G., Held M., Turlings T.C.J., Gershenzon J., Degenhardt J. The products of a single maize sesquiterpene synthase form a volatile defense signal that attracts natural enemies of maize herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:1129-1134.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0508027103

  106. 106.

    Arpaia S., De Cristofaro A., Guerrieri E., Bossi S., Cellini F., Di Leo G.M., Germinara G.S., Iodice L., Maffei M.E., Petrozza A., et al. Foraging activity of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.) on Bt-expressing eggplants. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2011;5:255-261.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11829-011-9144-5

  107. 107.

    Lewinsohn E., Schalechet F., Wilkinson J., Matsui K., Tadmor Y., Nam K.-H., Amar O., Lastochkin E., Larkov O., Ravid U., et al. Enhanced Levels of the Aroma and Flavor Compound S-Linalool by Metabolic Engineering of the Terpenoid Pathway in Tomato Fruits. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1256-1265.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.010293

  108. 108.

    Lavy M., Zuker A., Lewinsohn E., Larkov O., Ravid U., Vainstein A., Weiss D. Linalool and linalool oxide production in transgenic carnation flowers expressing the Clarkia breweri linalool synthase gene. Mol. Breed. 2002;9:103-111.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1026755414773

  109. 109.

    Lücker J., Schwab W., Franssen M.C.R., Van Der Plas L.H.W., Bouwmeester H., Verhoeven H.A. Metabolic engineering of monoterpene biosynthesis: Two-step production of (+)-trans-isopiperitenol by tobacco. Plant J. 2004;39:135-145.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02113.x

  110. 110.

    Diemer F., Caissard J.-C., Moja S., Chalchat J.-C., Jullien F. Altered monoterpene composition in transgenic mint following the introduction of 4S-limonene synthase. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001;39:603-614.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0981-9428(01)01273-6

  111. 111.

    Weathers P.J., Arsenault P.R., Covello P.S., McMickle A., Teoh K.H., Reed D. Artemisinin production in Artemisia annua: Studies in planta and results of a novel delivery method for treating malaria and other neglected diseases. Phytochem. Rev. 2010;10:173-183.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11101-010-9166-0

  112. 112.

    Yu Z.-X., Li J.-X., Yang C.-Q., Hu W.-L., Wang L.-J., Chen X.-Y. The Jasmonate-Responsive AP2/ERF Transcription Factors AaERF1 and AaERF2 Positively Regulate Artemisinin Biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Mol. Plant. 2012;5:353-365.

    Not in our library10.1093/mp/ssr087

  113. 113.

    Abbas F., Ke Y., Yu R., Yue Y., Amanullah S., Jahangir M.M., Fan Y. Volatile terpenoids: Multiple functions, biosynthesis, modulation and manipulation by genetic engineering. Planta. 2017;246:803-816.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-017-2749-x

  114. 114.

    Aharoni A., Jongsma M.A., Bouwmeester H. Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:594-602.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2005.10.005

  115. 115.

    Wani S.H., Kumar V., Shriram V., Sah S.K. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop. J. 2016;4:162-176.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cj.2016.01.010

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.