Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Calcium Signaling-Mediated Plant Response to Cold Stress

Peiguo Yuan, Tianbao Yang, B.W. Poovaiah

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2018 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijms19123896 (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Low temperatures have adverse impacts on plant growth, developmental processes, crop productivity and food quality. It is becoming clear that Ca2+ signaling plays a crucial role in conferring cold tolerance in plants. However, the role of Ca2+ involved in cold stress response needs to be further elucidated. Recent studies have shown how the perception of cold signals regulate Ca2+ channels to induce Ca2+ transients. In addition, studies have shown how Ca2+ signaling and its cross-talk with nitric oxide (NO), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) signaling pathways ultimately lead to establishing cold tolerance in plants. Ca2+ signaling also plays a key role through Ca2+/calmodulin-mediated Arabidopsis signal responsive 1 (AtSR1/CAMTA3) when temperatures drop rapidly. This review highlights the current status in Ca2+ signaling-mediated cold tolerance in plants.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

Cold is a major environmental factor that limits plant growth and reduces productivity and quality. Under low temperature conditions, plants exhibit a variety of cold-induced physiological and biochemical responses, such as production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), changes in membrane lipid composition and changes in osmolytes. Low temperatures also induce the expression of certain cold regulated (COR) genes, such as responsive to desiccation 29 (RD29A), COR15a, and kinase (KIN1), in order to stabilize membranes against freezing-induced injury. The dehydration response element-binding protein (DREB1) or CRT/DRE-binding factors are a family of closely related AP2/ERF transcription factors that regulate the COR gene expression, and c-repeat binding factors (CBFs) are themselves upregulated by cold through CBF expression 1 (ICE1).

Plant response to cold stress is a complex process. This response has been reported to require several signal pathways such as oxidative pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), phytohormone, abscisic acid (ABA), as well as Arabidopsis response regulators (ARRs). Ca2+, as a second messenger, is known to be involved in a variety of biological processes in eukaryotic cells, including playing a critical role in cold stress response in plants. Plants perceive cold stimulus by sensing the changes in cytoplasmic membrane via cold signal sensors, such as chilling tolerance divergence 1 (COLD1). Cold signal transduction involves the activation of Ca2+ channels and/or Ca2+ pumps to induce Ca2+ influx (Ca2+ signature) in plant cells. Ca2+ signals triggered by cold stimulus are relayed by Ca2+ sensors, such as calmodulins (CaMs), CaM-like proteins (CMLs), Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CPKs/CDPKs), and calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs). These Ca2+ sensors, together with other components in Ca2+ signaling, decode Ca2+ signals into downstream signaling events, such as phosphorylation, transcriptional reprogramming, activation of MAPKs cascade, as well as the accumulation of ROS or nitric oxide (NO), suggesting that Ca2+ signaling plays a key role in mediating plant response to cold stress.

2. Cold Stress-Induced Calcium Transients

Changes in Ca2+ transients are an early event in plant response to diverse environmental signals. The specific characteristics of the Ca2+ transients are defined as Ca2+ signatures, including amplitude, duration, and frequency. It is well documented that microbial signals induce specific Ca2+ signatures in the root hair. For example, the fungal symbiotic microbe (mycorrhizae) triggers a different Ca2+ signature, as compared to bacterial symbiotic microbe (rhizobacteria). Similarly, low temperatures also trigger Ca2+ transients in plants. Aequorin-based Ca2+ imaging revealed that low temperature (0 °C) induced a rapid and transient Ca2+ influx in whole seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Transient Ca2+ changes triggered by cold stress were also observed by using another Ca2+ sensor; Yellow Cameleon (YC3.6). The patch-clamp technique provided evidence of a predicted nonselective Ca2+-permeable cation channel in Arabidopsis mesophyll cells, and this Ca2+ channel is activated by cold stress.

3. Membrane Proteins Involved in the Perception of Cold Stress Signal Trigger Ca2+ Transients

Perception of environmental stimuli is considered an upstream event involved in inducing Ca2+ transients. Plants use diverse cytoplasmic membrane-localized receptor proteins/kinases in the perception and transduction of developmental and environmental signals. Although numerous receptor proteins/kinases (RKs) or receptor-like proteins/kinases (RLKs) have been identified in the perception of specific pathogens or hormones, few RKs or RLKs have been observed in the perception of cold stress signals in plants. Previous studies have indicated that plants could perceive cold signals through the physical change or damage of the cellular membranes. For example, low temperatures (0–10 °C) cause the reduction of fluidity in the cellular phospholipid membrane, while chilling stress results in plasma membrane rigidity. Supporting evidence is that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) triggers plant cell membrane rigidification and activates a cold response signaling pathway even when plants are grown at normal temperatures, while benzyl alcohol, as a fluidizer of cell membrane, suppresses a cold response signaling pathway when plants are grown at low temperatures. It is a reasonable assumption that the damage to plant membranes leads to ion leakage that induces Ca2+ changes under low temperature conditions. However, the perception, transduction, and the ultimate response to cold signals are complex and not clearly understood.

Another assumption is that the accumulation of ROS triggered by cold stress results in Ca2+ transients in plant cells. Low temperatures cause the production of ROS, and enhanced ROS induces Ca2+ transients, although the mechanisms are not clear. Previous reports identify that respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs) and encoding plasma membrane NADPH oxidases are crucial for ROS burst in plant response to diverse environmental stresses, including cold stress. Further study suggests that soybean genes regulated by cold 2 (AtSRC2) interacts with N-terminal of AtRBOHF and activates Ca2+-mediated NADPH oxidase activity of AtRBOHF in response to cold stress. These observations suggest that the cross-talk between Ca2+ signaling and ROS signaling plays a role in the perception of cold stimulus.

A recent study identified a specific receptor, COLD1, involved in the recognition of cold stress signal in rice. COLD1 is a plasma membrane (PM)- and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized transmembrane protein which senses cold signals and induces cold stress tolerance in plants. The cold1 knock-out mutants display cold sensitivity as compared to WT, when grown at 4 °C for 96 h; while the cold1-overexpressed plants display cold tolerance under similar conditions. In addition, Ca2+ transients triggered by cold stress are compromised in cold1 mutants as compared to WT. However, the hierarchy of Ca2+ transient changes and COLD1 in plant cold stress signaling pathway is unclear. One reasonable explanation is that COLD1 encodes a cation permeable channel or a subunit of calcium channel.

In addition, a recent study revealed that two putative Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive channels, mid1-complementing activity 1 (MCA1) and MCA2, are involved in cold-induced Ca2+ transients in Arabidopsis. MCA1 and MCA2 are PM-localized cation channels, and MCA1 interacts with MCA2 to form a homotetramer to regulate Ca2+ increase in the cytoplasm. Ca2+ influx triggered by cold stress is compromised in mca1 mca2 double mutant plants. Also, this double mutant plant displays cold sensitivity as compared to wild-type (WT). Further study revealed that MCA1 and MCA2 regulated CBF-independent cold signaling in plants, although the mechanism remains unclear.

4.1. Ca2+/CaM-Regulated Receptor-Like Kinases

It has been reported that Ca2+/CaM-regulated receptor-like kinases 1 (CRLK1), encoding a PM-associated serine/threonine kinase regulated by Ca2+ signaling, plays a critical role in plant response to cold stress. crlk1 knock-out mutant plants display enhanced sensitivity as compared to WT at freezing temperatures. The induction of cold-responsive genes triggered by cold stress, such as CBF1, RD29A and COR15a, were suppressed in crlk1 plants as compared to WT. In addition, low temperature (4 °C) and 10 mM H2O2 treatments induced the expression of CRLK1 protein. These observations suggest that CRLK1 positively regulates cold response in Arabidopsis. Further studies suggest that Ca2+/CaM is required for the activation of CRLK1 kinase. The CRLK1 kinase activity increased with an increase in CaM concentration in the presence of Ca2+, while CaM antagonist, CPZ, suppressed the CaM-stimulated CRLK1 kinase activity. Furthermore, the CaM-binding domain in the C-terminal of CRLK1 (residues 369–390) is required for CaM-stimulated kinase activity, and only the specific CaM isoform, such as potato calmodulin 1 (PCM1) and not PCM6, is responsible for the activation of CRLK1. These observations suggest that there is a Ca2+ signaling-mediated cold response pathway regulated by CRLK1.

4.2. Ca2+/CaM-Mediated CRLK and MAPK Cascade Response to Cold Stress

MAPK cascades are evolutionarily conserved in eukaryotic organisms. Previous studies have suggested that MAPK signaling pathways play a positive role in the regulation of cold response in plants, since mkk2 mutant plants are more sensitive to cold stress as compared to WT, while mkk2-overexpressed mutant plants display enhanced cold tolerance. Additionally, the transcriptional expression of CBF was induced in mkk2-overexpressing mutant plants even at normal temperatures. Further study revealed that low temperature activates Ca2+ signal-mediated CRLK1, which subsequently phosphorylated and activated MEKK1, an upstream component in MAPK cascade of MKK2. Activation of MKK2 by MEKK1 induced phosphorylation of MPK4 and MPK6. These results suggest that Ca2+ signaling plays a key role in MAPK-mediated plant response to cold stress. A recent study revealed that MPK3 and MPK6 negatively regulate cold tolerance in plants through the phosphorylation of the inducer of CBF expression 1 (ICE1), which subsequently induces ICE1 degradation. However, CRLK1 and CRLK2 repress the activation of MPK3 and MPK6 during cold stress, although the molecular mechanism is not clear. One reasonable assumption is that CRLKs regulates MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 cascade (MEKK1 is reported to be phosphorylated by CRLK1), while MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 cascade negatively regulates MPK4/MPK6 cascade. In addition, as mentioned above, Ca2+ signaling also positively regulates MAPKs-mediated plant response to cold stress through CPKs.

4.3. Ca2+-Dependent Protein Kinases

CPKs are reported to be involved in Ca2+-mediated signal transductions by connecting cold stress-triggered Ca2+ transients to downstream phosphorylation events. In rice, OsCPK27 was identified as a positive regulator of cold tolerance. The transcriptional expression of OsCPK27 was greatly induced by cold stress (4 °C, 12 h) and oscpk27-silenced mutant plants displayed compromised cold tolerance as compared to WT. Further study revealed that OsCPK27 induces cold response involving ROS, NO, and MAPKs pathways. At low temperatures, accumulations of ROS and NO was attenuated in oscpk27-silenced mutant plants. In addition, the activation of MAPK cascades, such as MPK1/2, was repressed in oscpk27-silenced mutant plants. Another study revealed that OsCPK24 regulated low temperature-triggered production of ROS through direct phosphorylation and suppression of thioltransferase activity of glutaredoxin 10 (OsGrx10), which acts as a glutathione-dependent thioltransferase in ROS signaling pathways. In addition, OsCPK17 was involved in cold stress and induced the accumulation of NO through its putative substrate, nitrate reductase 1 (OsNR1), involving NO metabolism. OsCPK17 has been reported to confer cold tolerance through the activation of PM-localized water transport plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2-1 (OsPIP2;1).

4.4. CBL and CIPK

CBLs, as Ca2+ signal sensors, also relay cold stress-triggered Ca2+ transients into phosphorylation events through their interaction with CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs). CBLs and CIPKs play crucial roles in abiotic and biotic stresses. In Arabidopsis, the transcriptional expressions of CBL1 and CIPK7 were induced at 4 °C, 3 h and 12 h, respectively. In addition, cbl1 knock-out mutant plants displayed increased cold sensitivity. In addition, the inductions of cold response genes, such as COR15a and KIN1, were suppressed in cbl1. Furthermore, CBL1 is found to interact with CIPK7 in the presence of Ca2+ in vitro and in vivo. These observations indicate that CIPK7, together with CBL1, are required for cold tolerance. In rice, the transcriptional expression of OsCIPK1, OsCIPK3 and OsCIPK9 were induced at low temperatures. Further study revealed that oscipk3-overexpressing mutant plants are more tolerant to cold stress as compared to WT, indicating that OsCIPK3 would be a positive regulator in cold tolerance. A recent investigation of the entire signal networks of CBLs-CIPKs in response to cold stress in Cassava. MeCBL2, MeCBL4, MeCBL5, MeCBL9, and MeCBL10 were induced by cold stress in roots, while only MeCBL5 was induced by cold stress in leaves. In addition, MeCIPK7, MeCIPK10, and MeCIPK13 were induced by cold stress in roots, while MeCIPK4, MeCIPK12, and MeCIPK14 were induced by cold stress in leaves. These observations suggest tissue-specific functions of CBLs-CIPKs in cold tolerance. However, how CIPKs and their substrates are involved in plant response to cold stress is not clear.

5. AtSR1/CAMTA3-Mediated Transcriptional Reprogramming

Ca2+/CaM-mediated transcription factors relay Ca2+ transients triggered by cold stress to transcriptional reprogramming. Arabidopsis signal responsive 1 (AtSR1), also known as calmodulin-binding transcriptional activator 3 (CAMTA3), is well documented as a CaM-mediated transcription factor (TF) to regulate gene expressions by binding to the “CGCG” DNA-binding motif in their promoter region. AtSR1 positively regulates plant cold tolerance, since atsr1 knock-out mutant plants display increased sensitivity to cold stress as compared to WT. The transcriptional expression of CBF1 was suppressed in atsr1 at low temperatures, and the promoter of CBF1 contains the AtSR1-recognized DNA motif. These observations indicate that AtSR1 regulates CBF1-mediated signaling pathway during cold stress. Furthermore, accumulated salicylic acid (SA) in atsr1 had no impact on cold tolerance, but SA plays a key role in transcriptional reprogramming at low temperatures. Promoter analysis of wound-induced genes revealed a rapid stress response DNA element (RSRE), CGCGTT. In addition, promoter activity assay revealed that luciferase activity level triggered by cold stress was compromised in atsr1 as compared to WT, indicating AtSR1-mediate cold tolerance through the regulation of genes containing RSRE in their promoters. An earlier study indicated that AtSR1 positively regulates the transcriptional expression of CBF2 through binding to “CCGCGT” motif in its promoter region. In addition, heptahelical protein 2 (HHP2) was identified to interact with AtSR1; HHP2, including HHP1 and HHP3, was induced by R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, MYB96, at low temperatures. These results suggest that Ca2+ signaling regulates transcriptome response to cold stress through AtSR1.

A recent study revealed that AtSR1, together with CAMTA5, regulated CBFs only in response to a rapid reduction in temperatures, but not to a gradual reduction in temperatures (3 °C/10 min). Interestingly, unlike circadian clock associated 1 (CCA1), which only mediates cold response during the daytime, AtSR1 regulates cold response during both day and night-time, although the underlying mechanism is not clear. Another recent study revealed that the first IQ motifs in AtSR1 (residues 850–875) are required for its activity. Additionally, post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation or dephosphorylation, would play an important role in AtSR1-mediated signaling response to environmental stimulus. Two putative phosphorylation sites in AtSR1, S454, and S964, were identified. Functional tests revealed that camta1 camta3 double mutants complemented with mutated AtSR1 protein, S454A and S964A (in the phosphorylation sites of AtSR1), were partially restored to WT; and the repression of the biosynthesis of SA in the mutants was impaired, indicating that phosphorylation is required for the full function of AtSR1.

It has been documented that AtSR1 is a defense repressor and is degraded to induce SA-mediated immune response during pathogen attack. Interestingly, SA-mediated signaling pathways were also observed to be activated in plants subjected to long-term cold treatments (4 °C, one or two weeks). However, the activation of the SA signaling pathway was not caused by the degradation of AtSR1 protein. In contrast, AtSR1 protein accumulates under low temperatures. These observations indicate that plants may possess multiple pathways to overcome AtSR1 suppression of the SA signaling pathway, in order to establish appropriate response to specific stress, although the molecular mechanism remains unclear.

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

In recent years, the mechanism of plant cold stress tolerance and genes involved in the cold stress signaling network have been intensively investigated. Several signal pathways are involved in cold stress signaling. Perception of cold stimulus is considered to be the earliest event in triggering the induction of Ca2+ transients in plant cells. A variety of Ca2+ channels and/or Ca2+ pumps are involved in creating cold stress-triggered Ca2+ transients, which are relayed and deciphered by various Ca2+ sensors to induce the changes in gene expression and eventually cold tolerance in plants. Much progress has been made in the understanding of several Ca2+-mediated signal networks, such as Ca2+-CBL-CIPK and Ca2+-CaM-AtSR1/CAMTA3. Figure 1 illustrates the current status of Ca2+-mediated signaling in cold stress response. It should be noted that we attempted to cover as many studies on calcium-regulated cold signaling as possible. However, in this short communication we had to restrict ourselves to some recent highlights. Plant cold tolerance is a complex process involving a variety of signal transduction pathways. It is still not clear how Ca2+-mediated signaling interacts with other signaling pathways and coordinates cold response in plants. Furthermore, it is a challenge to dissect the role of Ca2+ signals in cold acclimation, and to determine whether cold stress induces Ca2+ transients in the nucleus. Emerging technologies, such as more sensitive Ca2+ imaging, -omics and gene editing approaches will be powerful tools to answer these questions.

References 80

  1. 1.

    Thomashow M.F. PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999;50:571-599.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571 (opens in a new tab)

  2. 2.

    Browse J., Xin Z. Temperature sensing and cold acclimation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:241-246.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00167-9 (opens in a new tab)

  3. 3.

    Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;6:410-417.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00092-x (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    Chinnusamy V., Ohta M., Kanrar S., Lee B.-H., Hong X., Agarwal M., Zhu J.-K. ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1043-1054.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1077503 (opens in a new tab)

  5. 5.

    Lee B.-H., Henderson D.A., Zhu J.-K. The Arabidopsis Cold-Responsive Transcriptome and Its Regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3155-3175.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.035568 (opens in a new tab)

  6. 6.

    Jeon J., Kim J. Arabidopsis response Regulator1 and Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer Protein2 (AHP2), AHP3, and AHP5 function in cold signaling. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:408-424.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.207621 (opens in a new tab)

  7. 7.

    Jeon J., Kim N.Y., Kim S., Kang N.Y., Novák O., Ku S.-J., Cho C., Lee D.J., Lee E.-J., Strnad M., et al. A Subset of Cytokinin Two-component Signaling System Plays a Role in Cold Temperature Stress Response in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:23371-23386.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.096644 (opens in a new tab)

  8. 8.

    Zhu J.-K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell. 2016;167:313-324.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029 (opens in a new tab)

  9. 9.

    Danquah A., de Zelicourt A., Colcombet J., Hirt H. The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32:40-52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006 (opens in a new tab)

  10. 10.

    Zipfel C., Oldroyd G.E.D. Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity. Nature. 2017;543:328-336.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature22009 (opens in a new tab)

  11. 11.

    Yuan P., Du L., Poovaiah B. Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent AtSR1/CAMTA3 Plays Critical Roles in Balancing Plant Growth and Immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1764.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms19061764 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.

    Ma Y., Dai X., Xu Y., Luo W., Zheng X., Zeng D., Pan Y., Lin X., Liu H., Zhang D., et al. COLD1 Confers Chilling Tolerance in Rice. Cell. 2015;160:1209-1221.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046 (opens in a new tab)

  13. 13.

    Mori K., Renhu N., Naito M., Nakamura A., Shiba H., Yamamoto T., Suzaki T., Iida H., Miura K. Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive channels MCA1 and MCA2 mediate cold-induced cytosolic Ca2+ increase and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-17483-y (opens in a new tab)

  14. 14.

    Wilkins K.A., Matthus E., Swarbreck S.M., Davies J.M. Calcium-Mediated Abiotic Stress Signaling in Roots. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2016.01296 (opens in a new tab)

  15. 15.

    Yuan P., Jauregui E., Du L., Tanaka K., Poovaiah B.W. Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017;38:173-183.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.003 (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Liu Z., Jia Y., Ding Y., Shi Y., Li Z., Guo Y., Gong Z., Yang S. Plasma Membrane CRPK1-Mediated Phosphorylation of 14-3-3 Proteins Induces Their Nuclear Import to Fine-Tune CBF Signaling during Cold Response. Mol. Cell. 2017;66:117-128.e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.016 (opens in a new tab)

  18. 18.

    Reddy A.S.N., Ali G.S., Celesnik H., Day I.S. Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2010-2032.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.111.084988 (opens in a new tab)

  19. 19.

    Plieth C. Calcium: Just another regulator in the machinery of life? Ann. Bot. 2005;96:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1093/aob/mci144 (opens in a new tab)

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Gilroy S., Suzuki N., Miller G., Choi W.-G., Toyota M., Devireddy A.R., Mittler R. A tidal wave of signals: Calcium and ROS at the forefront of rapid systemic signaling. Trends. Plant Sci. 2014;19:623-630.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.013 (opens in a new tab)

  22. 22.

    Hines P.J. Calcium signals the making of symbiosis. Science. 2016;352:1071.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.352.6289.1071-e (opens in a new tab)

  23. 23.

    Charpentier M., Sun J., Martins T.V., Radhakrishnan G.V., Findlay K., Soumpourou E., Thouin J., Véry A.-A., Sanders D., Morris R.J., et al. Nuclear-localized cyclic nucleotide–gated channels mediate symbiotic calcium oscillations. Science. 2016;352:1102-1105.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aae0109 (opens in a new tab)

  24. 24.

    Poovaiah B.W., Du L. Calcium signaling: Decoding mechanism of calcium signatures. New Phytol. 2018;217:1394-1396.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.15003 (opens in a new tab)

  25. 25.

    Carpaneto A., Ivashikina N., Levchenko V., Krol E., Jeworutzki E., Zhu J.-K., Hedrich R. Cold Transiently Activates Calcium-Permeable Channels in Arabidopsis Mesophyll Cells. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:487-494.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.106.090928 (opens in a new tab)

  26. 26.

    Knight H., Trewavas A.J., Knight M.R. Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involves two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell. 1996;8:489-503.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.8.3.489 (opens in a new tab)

  27. 27.

    Jeon J., Kim J. Cold stress signaling networks in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Biol. 2013;56:69-76.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12374-013-0903-y (opens in a new tab)

  28. 28.

    Krebs M., Held K., Binder A., Hashimoto K., Den Herder G., Parniske M., Kudla J., Schumacher K. FRET-based genetically encoded sensors allow high-resolution live cell imaging of Ca2+ dynamics. Plant J. 2012;69:181-192.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04780.x (opens in a new tab)

  29. 29.

    Takahashi D., Li B., Nakayama T., Kawamura Y., Uemura M. Plant plasma membrane proteomics for improving cold tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2013.00090 (opens in a new tab)

  30. 30.

    Robards A.W., Clarkson D.T. Effects of chilling temperatures on root cell membranes as viewed by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Protoplasma. 1984;122:75-85.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01279439 (opens in a new tab)

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Guo X., Liu D., Chong K. Cold signaling in plants: Insights into mechanisms and regulation. J. Int. Plant Biol. 2018;60:745-756.

    Not in our library10.1111/jipb.12706 (opens in a new tab)

  33. 33.

    Suzuki N., Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species and temperature stresses: A delicate balance between signaling and destruction. Physiol. Plant. 2006;126:45-51.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0031-9317.2005.00582.x (opens in a new tab)

  34. 34.

    Keller T., Damude H.G., Werner D., Doerner P., Dixon R.A., Lamb C. A Plant Homolog of the Neutrophil NADPH Oxidase gp91phox Subunit Gene Encodes a Plasma Membrane Protein with Ca2+ Binding Motifs. Plant Cell. 1998;10:255-266.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.10.2.255 (opens in a new tab)

  35. 35.

    Li L., Li M., Yu L., Zhou Z., Liang X., Liu Z., Cai G., Gao L., Zhang X., Wang Y., et al. The FLS2-Associated Kinase BIK1 Directly Phosphorylates the NADPH Oxidase RbohD to Control Plant Immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:329-338.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.009 (opens in a new tab)

  36. 36.

    Akamatsu A., Wong H.L., Fujiwara M., Okuda J., Nishide K., Uno K., Imai K., Umemura K., Kawasaki T., Kawano Y., et al. An OsCEBiP/OsCERK1-OsRacGEF1-OsRac1 Module Is an Essential Early Component of Chitin-Induced Rice Immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:465-476.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.007 (opens in a new tab)

  37. 37.

    Kawarazaki T., Kimura S., Iizuka A., Hanamata S., Nibori H., Michikawa M., Imai A., Abe M., Kaya H., Kuchitsu K. A low temperature-inducible protein AtSRC2 enhances the ROS-producing activity of NADPH oxidase AtRbohF. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:2775-2780.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.024 (opens in a new tab)

  38. 38.

    Manishankar P., Kudla J. Cold Tolerance Encoded in One SNP. Cell. 2015;160:1045-1046.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.037 (opens in a new tab)

  39. 39.

    Gough N.R. Rice that tolerates a chill. Sci. Signal. 2015;8:ec76.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aab2152 (opens in a new tab)

  40. 40.

    Nakagawa Y., Katagiri T., Shinozaki K., Qi Z., Tatsumi H., Furuichi T., Kishigami A., Sokabe M., Kojima I., Sato S., et al. Arabidopsis plasma membrane protein crucial for Ca2+ influx and touch sensing in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:3639-3644.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0607703104 (opens in a new tab)

All 80 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.