No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.
Current Stereotypes Associated with Nursing and Nursing Professionals: An Integrative Review
Cristina Teresa-Morales, Margarita Rodríguez-Pérez, Miriam Araujo-Hernández and 1 more
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2022 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Nursing and nursing professionals are associated with social stereotypes, which may hinder the profession’s development and future prospects as a scientific discipline. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the stereotypes associated with the nursing profession—students and professionals. Therefore, we carried out an integrative review. The search was conducted using PubMed, WOS, and CINAHL databases, and its search strategy was based on a combination of standardised keywords and natural vocabulary, with a temporal limit between 2016 and 2021. The data extraction and analysis was based on the conceptual framework developed by Whittemore and Knafl. Twenty-seven studies were included in the review, and their results were classified and coded. Two categories emerged, namely, stereotypes relating to the professionals’ gender and stereotypes relating to the profession itself. We concluded that the nursing profession is viewed as female with low skills, social status, salary, academic level and entry requirements, and with little autonomy. Male nurses’ professional competencies and masculinity are questioned, while the work carried out by female nurses is viewed as unprofessional. To reduce these stereotypes and bias we must present the nursing profession as a scientific discipline, developed by both men and women. Specific channels for this awareness-raising work include interventions from universities and the media, and participation in health policies.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
1. Introduction
Stereotypes may be defined as a mental image of the characteristics and behaviours shared by a group of people. They are used to simplify more complex ideas accepted collectively by a group or society, and they are unchanging. Stereotypes are closely linked to gender, which is a cultural construction that attributes different types of behaviour to men and women as a result of their sexual differentiation. They are sociocultural constructions, defined and categorised according to what is considered “natural” or “proper”. Male and female roles are stereotyped in different ways. These stereotypes are accepted by most societies and are perpetuated by education, the media, and within families, for example, creating a gender identity and a way of differentiating between the sexes.
Throughout history, in almost every culture, women have been assigned a reproductive gender role based around biological reproduction and the home, involving raising children, feeding and caring for members of the household, and organising and maintaining the home. Meanwhile, men are assigned a productive role revolving around income-generating activities and paid work to support their families; these are considered the main type of productive activity and are highly valued by society as a result. These assigned gender roles constrain women and steer them towards traditional caring roles, keeping them away from the public sphere and from activities considered more appropriate to men, which are more highly paid and offer higher social status. The categorisation of these behaviours has led to discrimination based on the value assigned to each role by society.
Professions and professionals develop within a social context shaped by stereotypes that influence perceptions of the profession and affect its growth and development. Nursing has always been associated with components of gender, which relate to the origins of the profession and gender roles more broadly. Social perceptions of nursing professionals are thus shaped by the social divide between men and women, and by the roles attributed to women and nursing interventions in particular. This vision influences nurses’ own perceptions and self-concept, even affecting their decision as to whether or not to pursue a nursing degree.
Previous studies have focused on the social image of the nursing profession, its representation in the media, the situation of male nurses within the profession and the social perception of nurses. According to these studies, at the end of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century, the public image of nurses was diverse and incongruous. The nursing profession was perceived as a profession little valued and understood by society, maybe because people had incorrect information about the functions performed by nursing professionals. Therefore, this public image was predominantly based on misconceptions and stereotypes. The media perpetuated the stereotypes of the nurse as angels of mercy, the doctor’s handmaiden and sexy nurse or sex object. The male nurse was viewed as effeminate or homosexual or he was erased from the image of the profession, making him invisible to society. However, the social image of the nursing profession and its professionals changes with, or should change with, changes in society. At the social level, the last decade has been characterized by increased access to various sources of information, communications and social networks. On a professional level, the visibility of the nursing profession has grown with events such as the WHO’s declaration of the Year of the Nurse and the Midwife, in 2020 (Year of the Nurse and the Midwife 2020 (who.int (accessed on 20 June 2022))); the Nursing Now campaign from the International Council of Nursing (https://www.nursingnow.org/ (accessed on 20 June 2022)); the #FakeNurses campaign in Spain ((183) Campaña #FakeNurses #EsaNoSoyYo-YouTube), and the significant public exposure of healthcare professionals as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. These circumstances should have favoured access to a deeper knowledge about the nursing profession. We may thus expect that the gender stereotypes of nursing professionals and the lack of knowledge about the profession have been minimized. For these reasons, our research question was: “What are the stereotypes with which the nursing profession and nursing professionals are currently associated?” So, the identification of studies, which could provide evidence of stereotypes associated with the nursing profession and professionals, will allow that these stereotypes and elements that impacting on access to training and on professional development can be addressed. This review paves the way for interventions to tackle the origins, perpetuation, and consequences of stereotypes relating to the nursing profession to be planned.
2. Materials and Methods
Aim: to identify and describe the stereotypes associated with the nursing profession, both students and professionals.
Design: The stages followed in this integrative review are based on the methodological framework developed by Whittemore and Knafl: identification of the research problem; literature search; data assessment; data analysis and synthesis; and presentation of selected data.
First stage: Identification of the Research Problem. This stage has been described in the Introduction section.
Second stage: Literature Search. The literature search was conducted between June 2021 and September 2021. The databases explored were: PubMed, WOS, and CINAHL. The search was limited to studies published between 2016 and 2021 in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The inclusion criteria were: articles whose object of study was stereotypes relating to the nursing profession or nursing professionals (IC1) and original articles using a qualitative, quantitative, and/or mixed methodology (IC2). The exclusion criteria were: reviews and articles using a historical methodology (EC1); studies aiming to identify the stereotypes of other groups held by nurses (EC2); and methodological quality evaluation (EC3), which we will describe in Data Assessment. The search strategy was based on a combination of the following keywords: stereotyping/nursing/nurses/nurse. The thesaurus of each database was selected and used for the search using standardised terms (MESH for PubMed; MH for CINAHL). To complete the search, the same terms were used as keywords in natural language to search by title and abstract (T/A for PubMed and CINAHL; TI and AB for WOS). The details of the search strategies employed can be seen in Table 1.
We found 687 articles when the search limits were applied. Once duplicates were removed, there were a total of 554 articles remaining, which were analysed and screened for suitability by reading the titles (n = 146). During the abstracts review, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied (n = 36). Another 4 articles were excluded during the full text review because their results were not associated with stereotypes of nursing or nurses (n = 32). (See Figure 1. Literature search and data assessment flow diagram.)
Third stage: Data Assessment. Following the Whittemore and Kanfl recommendation, the methodological quality of studies was assessed. This was done using the MMAT, a tool consisting of two sections: a two-question section common to all studies and a specific five-question section for each type of study. The templates for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies were reviewed independently by the researchers. Studies that did not pass the initial screening questions common to all types of study were rejected (five articles). Finally, 27 articles were reviewed. (See Figure 1. Literature search and aata assessment flow diagram.)
Fourth stage: Data Analysis and Synthesis. For the extraction and synthesis of data, researchers performed a comprehensive and exhaustive reading of the selected studies. The results of the selected studies were classified and coded via an inductive approach and the emerging categories were reduced, using the analytical framework developed by Whittemore and Knafl.
Ethical approval: The methodology used in this study does not require ethical approval.
3. Results
Descriptive analysis: 27 articles were included: 7 quantitative studies; 18 qualitative studies; and 2 mixed methods studies. Study samples included: young people and university students (no. 4); nursing students of both sexes (no. 5); male nursing students (no. 5); nurses of both sexes and professionals working with nurses in teams (no. 12); patients (no. 3); and the general public (no. 2). It should be noted that some studies had a sample composed of more than one population sector. Table 2 provides a summary of the studies included.
Qualitative analysis: the qualitative analysis of the results of the analysed articles produced two general themes: stereotypes relating to the professionals’ gender; and, stereotypes of the nursing profession. We show in Table 3 each theme with its associated sub-themes and categories.
3.1. Theme 1. Stereotypes Relating to Professionals’ Gender
In Kim and colleagues’ study, 48.8% of the participants held progressive views on nursing, pointing to an absence of gender stereotypes relating to the exercise of the profession and to the possession of appropriate skills enabling nursing professionals to perform adequately. They perceived professionals of both genders as equals and as necessary members of the healthcare team, who work equally hard at their jobs. However, this perception is contradicted by the results obtained for the remainder of the study sample and by other authors, indicating that there are a number of stereotypes relating to professionals’ gender. These stereotypes are listed below:
3.1.1. Subtheme 1.1. Female Nurses’ Stereotypes
C.1 Female Nurses: The Ideal Gender for Nursing
The respondents in Cottingham and colleagues’ paper defined nursing as a profession that has traditionally been carried out mainly by women. This coincides with the 66.8% male and 72.4% female nursing and midwifery professionals interviewed in Stanley and colleagues’ study, echoing the results of numerous other studies.
The woman-nurse nexus is more pronounced in other studies, where nursing is viewed as a job aimed at women; characteristic of women; suitable only for women, and more appropriate for women. This stereotype is identified by professionals themselves: 56% of men and 50.75% of women in Stanley and colleagues’ article; male nurses; and female nurses who feel that nursing is an appropriate, suitable profession for them.
The stereotype of women as innately suited to caring can be seen in patients’ preferences for female nurses. This is corroborated by male student nurses; 84.2% of the Spanish general public; 85% of the Saudi university community; and patients. It is most commonly seen among female patients, who may oppose care from male nurses. This preference may be related to the normalisation of women delivering personal care without sexual connotations. By contrast, Rabie and colleagues showed that some male patients prefer to receive care from male nurses as they feel more comfortable with them.
C.2 Female Nurses: Family Struggles
In Elmorshedy and colleagues’ study, 50% of the participants would be willing to marry a nurse, but 65% believed that being a nurse had a negative impact on women’s social lives and that nurses delayed marriage due to the demands of their profession. A similar trend emerged in another paper, where participants expressed the belief that women should interrupt or abandon their professional careers at certain points in their lives to look after their families. These beliefs may explain the lack of family support perceived by some women when they decide to become nurses.
3.1.2. Subtheme 1.2. Male Nurses’ Stereotypes
C.3 Male Nurses: Out of Place
Social perceptions of nursing as a women’s job give rise to the notion that men are out of place in nursing or that they are unsuitable for the profession. This perception is expressed by: 16% of the general public; patients of both sexes, who explain that male nurses do not reflect their expectations or understanding of the nursing profession; clinical nurses and nurse educators, who stated their belief that men should not be nurses; and male student nurses’ families, who considered nursing to be a women’s profession. This stereotype was echoed by male student nurses in the study by Juliff and colleagues, which found that society has a biased view of what nurses do and of how men fit into nursing roles.
Generally speaking, it is considered inappropriate for male nurses to work in gynaecology, obstetrics, maternity, and paediatric units, where professionals and/or patients did not permit or condone male students or professionals carrying out tasks such as gynaecological examinations and care for newborns and infants, as they were considered to be less skilled and suitable for these activities despite their training and prior experience. Similar feelings were expressed with regard to procedures relating to women’s hygiene in these and other units.
Some studies concluded that men are associated with the following characteristics as carers: hesitant; untrustworthy; less sensitive to others’ emotions, or less able to express themselves than women; disorganised, irresponsible, careless when delivering basic care, reckless, and disrespectful of confidentiality.
In contrast with these stereotyped beliefs about male nurses based on broader understandings of male roles, another vision is also expressed: male nurses are caring, open-minded professionals; friendly, empathetic, helpful, punctual, enthusiastic, kind, and better at management than female nurses.
Men’s allegedly greater management and leadership skills are supported by multiple sources. Some sources note that care and personnel management roles are earmarked for the minority of male nurses, who are considered and consider themselves as the elite of the profession.
When it comes to delivering care, men are considered and consider themselves to be better at performing techniques such as venous catheterisation and administering intravenous medication and drugs. The female student nurses surveyed by Carlsson and colleagues believed that they were good at delivering basic care, communicating with patients, handling sensitive information, and providing comprehensive care coordination. Meanwhile, male student nurses perceived themselves as being good at administering drugs and applying pharmaceutical knowledge, handling medical devices, and responding to emergencies. Men appear to have a preference for more technical areas, such as emergency, critical care, and surgical units, as well as mental health and psychiatric units. In another study, this preference is linked to the fact that these units are the least visible to the Arab public, which views male nurses as inadequate.
Finally, Stanley and colleagues found that 50.6% of men and 40.4% of women did not agree that male nurses are unsuited to the profession. The item “Men make good nurses” came seventh and sixth among students in the first and third years of the nursing degree, respectively, in Čukljek and colleagues’ paper. Meanwhile, male nurses’ ability to dedicate more time to professional development than female nurses due to their lesser family responsibilities was highlighted as a positive characteristic.
C.4 Male Nurses: Male Weakness or Homosexuality
In numerous studies, homosexuality was identified as one of the most common stereotypes relating to male nurses. Several studies confirm this belief among patients of both sexes; among nursing professionals themselves, and student nurses’ families. Patients were even observed to exhibit more introverted behaviour until they had confirmed that the male nurse caring for them was not homosexual. However, another study dismissed this belief, and this stereotype was rejected by 73% of its participants.
A relationship between homosexuality and the decision to study nursing was identified, an idea that was held by students themselves. This has an influence on men when deciding whether or not to enter the profession. The sample in Stanley and colleagues’ study mostly agreed with this statement (59.6% of men; 50.9% of women), leading to changes in male nurses’ masculinity in some cases.
Another factor that calls male nurses’ masculinity into question and provokes feelings of shame is the use of female terms such as ‘nurse’, ‘sister’, and ‘matron’ to refer to them. These social customs perpetuate perceptions of nursing as a women’s profession.
These days, social acceptance of different sexual orientations and a trend towards unisex roles allows men to display sensitivity, warmth, and affection without being labelled as homosexual, prompting this stereotype to be perceived differently. There are also more extreme perceptions, whereby male nursing professionals are assumed to be aiming for senior management roles if they accept this feminisation. In addition, some male nurses reject the existing model of masculinity.
C.5 Male Nurses: A Sexual Threat
Professional nursing care requires physical contact between nurses and patients. It is considered normal for female nurses to engage in non-sexual, personal physical contact with men viewed as unsuitable for this task. This means that male nurses are avoided or perceived as a heterosexual threat to women or a homosexual threat to men, which may even make them vulnerable to accusations of inappropriate behaviour towards patients or female colleagues. It appears that male nurses’ gender is not always decoupled from their professional abilities, giving rise to misinterpretations of their actions or distrust in their intentions. The clearest manifestation of this stereotype was seen in a female teacher addressing a male participant in Cottingham and colleagues’ paper, telling him that she would not assign a female patient to him because “she knew what he would do”.
C.6 Male Nurses: Shame and Embarrassment
Some nursing students were ashamed by their perceived rejection by society, their families, their friends, and other healthcare professionals when they expressed their desire to become nurses. This rejection and the possibility or reality of being mocked provoke shame in many male nurses, who opt to avoid telling people that they are nurses; conceal their work using ambiguous terms such as ‘healthcare professional’; or hide in units where little contact with the public is required.
Another source of shame for male nurses is linked to issues with the provision of uniforms by healthcare facilities, which do not always have uniforms for men, obliging them to wear women’s uniforms. In some contexts, being a nurse can have a negative impact on men’s marriage prospects, as many people would refuse to allow their daughters to marry a nurse.
C.7 Male Nurses: Physical Strength
Numerous references to male nurses as the physical force behind the nursing profession were identified. On some occasions, this was perceived as an advantage when it was necessary to move or hold patients, while on other occasions, male nurses believed that they received greater recognition or were valued more for their physical strength than their professionalism. This had a negative impact on their careers as their female colleagues received more opportunities for practical learning, while they were only required to perform tasks requiring physical strength.
C.8 Male Nurses: Should Be Doctors
The studies in this review highlighted the belief that men who choose to study or work in nursing have made a mistake and should instead be studying or working in medicine. In Sales-Mauricio and colleagues’ study, 10.5% of respondents stated that their desire to become nurses was met with comments from their social circles such as: “But you’re clever, why don’t you study medicine?”. In Mao and colleagues’ paper, the comments made were “You’re a guy. Why nursing? Why not go into policing or something else?”, while Juliff and colleagues recorded comments such as “What’s a guy doing working as a nurse?” and “Didn’t you want to be a doctor?”. Although some study nursing as an indirect route into medicine or paramedicine, others explain that they do not aspire to become doctors but are instead keen to care for and look after people.
This stereotype is so deeply rooted in some cultural contexts that patients believe that all men in white uniforms are doctors and all women are nurses. As a result, male nurses are frequently mistaken for doctors, which was a source of embarrassment for participants. On some occasions, they opted not to correct the error as they considered themselves more interesting in this role.
3.2. Theme 2. Stereotypes of the Nursing Profession
C.9 An Unknown Profession
Ignorance of nursing and nursing professionals within society is a key factor in producing erroneous, inappropriate ideas of the profession. In Woods–Giscombe and colleagues’ study, female nurses explained that patients’ expectations of them did not reflect their professional role and that patients neither knew nor understood nurses’ role and tasks. This ignorance was shared by a student nurse, who commented that he had not fully grasped what nurses did until he began to study nursing, and by several participants in a reviewed study, who were unable to describe what nursing consists of or what nurses do without comparing them to doctors.
In some studies, nurses were described as handling body fluids and other materials, administering injections, and providing patients with basic care. This image has given rise to the belief that nurses do little more than ensure patients’ hygiene and may affect the level of family support for students’ decision to study nursing, with some relatives opposing their choice on the basis that nurses only “wipe bottoms”. Nursing is sometimes perceived as a repetitive, “boring job” or as a “dirty job”, of little importance to patients. Nurses’ work was viewed as stressful as they have to deal with distressed patients and relatives, as well as difficult, demanding, laborious, and requiring intense physical effort.
With regard to ignorance of the profession, the image of nursing portrayed in the media showed a profession with limited opportunities for growth.
C.10 A Valued But Not Prestigious Profession
Sanz Vega and colleagues observed that 97% of participants trusted nurses to enter their homes; 75.6% trusted them to administer a new form of care; and 56.1% trusted nurses to prescribe medication. A participant in Marcinowicz and colleagues’ study expressed the opinion that nurses were highly trusted, much more highly than doctors. The participants in Alexander and colleague’s paper had a positive perception of the care provided by nurses.
Despite these positive assessments, other studies point to the profession’s low prestige and social status. This affects the degree of acceptance from nurses’ families when they reveal their chosen profession, which some people consider not to be good enough.
In some cultural contexts, as in 71% of Elmorshedy and colleagues’ sample, people would feel ashamed to have a nurse in the family. This feeling of shame increased when the nurse was male.
The degree of social prestige associated with the profession appears to derive from a comparison with other professions, such as medicine. This factor was expressed by young people seeking to study medicine, who believed that they would obtain greater power and status as doctors than as nurses. In Kämmer and colleagues’ study, a participant commented that nurses belong to a different social class and are poorer than doctors. However, the participants in another research study rated nursing as the second most valued profession after medicine. In Liaw and colleagues’ paper, students attributed the prestige surrounding the medical profession to social media, pointing to the fact that doctors are often portrayed as heroes while nurses are cast in a more passive role. 31.2% of participants in another study disagreed with this portrayal.
Meanwhile, in Woods–Giscombe and colleagues’ article, students believed that nursing was just as prestigious as medicine, and in Čukljek and collegues’ study, they stated that “the service given by nurses is as important as that given by physicians”.
Other studies noted the lack of respect for nurses shown by patients, doctors, and society in general. This corroborates the opinions of the third-year students surveyed by Čukljek and colleagues, who expressed lower levels of agreement with the item “Nursing is a respected profession” than first-year students, with a statistically significant difference.
C.11 A Subordinate Profession
The autonomy of the nursing profession is called into question in studies such as Alexander and Diefenbach, where the participants used terms such as “subordinate” to describe nursing. In another study, the participating students believed that doctors were respected for their ability to make autonomous diagnoses, whereas nurses were subordinate and had to abide by the doctors’ decisions; this was corroborated in several studies. Nursing is perceived as a profession in which doctors’ orders and instructions are obeyed, resulting in acquiescence to doctors and undervaluing of nurses. This vision was expressed by some nursing professionals, who stated that doctors give instructions to nurses and that only doctors must speak in front of patients, with nurses remaining in the background. One male nurse in Kluczyńska and colleagues’ study explained that he struggled to defer to doctors as he was a man, viewing subordination as easier for women.
Other studies presented different conclusions, such as Čukljek and colleagues’ article, in which third-year students agreed more strongly with the statement “Nurses are capable of independent practice” than first-year students, with a statistically significant difference. Moreover, 69.1% of the sample in Sanz Vega and colleagues’ paper stated that nurses have their own duties that do not depend on doctors.
C.12 A Profession with Low Academic Requirements
One of the stereotypes of the nursing profession is that it requires a low academic level, which is compared in some studies to the stricter academic requirements in other professions. The academic qualifications required to access nursing are lower than those needed for medicine, making it a good option for students who fail to achieve the necessary grades and do not want to resit their exams.
With regard to the type of training received by nurses, 80.8% of the general public participating in Sanz Vega and colleagues’ study identified it as university education and 72.8% were aware that there are nursing specialities. By contrast, one-third of the participants in another study disagreed that nurses need a university education.
With regard to training quality, most professionals and members of the general public declared that the nursing profession was highly-skilled. In Čukljek and colleagues’ study, the participating students strongly agreed with all the items related to nursing education, including “Nurses with completed undergraduate nursing studies and graduate studies significantly contribute to patient care” and “Nurses integrate health teaching into their practice”. The level of agreement increased among final-year students compared to first-year students. This was the only study to present results on nursing research, noting that participants agreed or strongly agreed with the following statements: “Research is vital to nursing as a profession”; “The major goal of nursing research is to improve patient care”; and “Nurses incorporate research findings into their clinical practice”.
C.13 A Profession with Questionable Working Conditions
The participants in two studies expressed the belief that nursing provided permanent, stable employment. 77.8% of those surveyed by Chen and colleagues, and other studies explained that the job opportunities, convenience, and stability offered by the profession had influenced their decision to become nurses. These factors are reflected in: “Nursing provided a safe haven and the opportunity for families entering the country to live the American dream” and in the view that nursing is a good opportunity for women to obtain a secure, stable job. However, in Čukljek and colleagues’ research, third-year students strongly agreed with: “Nurses should have a right to strike”, and disagreed with: “Nurses speak out against inadequate working conditions”.
The participants in another study thought that the salary was decent and higher than average. However, it was viewed as insufficient or inadequate and as low in comparison to other healthcare professionals, which may have a negative impact on the prestige assigned to the profession.
Several studies pointed to other benefits besides salary: economic stability; having a place to live; health insurance; and opportunities for promotion within the profession.
4. Discussion
This review revealed two different types of stereotypes: stereotypes relating to the gender identity of nursing professionals, and stereotypes relating to the characteristics of the nursing profession itself.
The stereotypes relating to nursing professionals were shaped by the gender roles imposed on both men and women in contemporary society. Women are assigned a role based on reproduction and care for the family, which are viewed as innate to women’s nature. These characteristics are also attributed to female nurses, who are considered more suitable for the profession than male nurses.
Terry and colleagues explain that the feminisation of the nursing profession in educational and professional contexts gives rise to stereotypes that constrain women’s professional activity and limit men’s participation in the profession. Female nurses are valued less as they perform intrinsically female tasks and are not perceived as specialised professionals. The failure to value female nurses’ professional activity has an impact on their everyday work: they receive more verbal insults; their work is sexualised; and they suffer more degrading treatment in the workplace. Some studies add that this discrimination can be observed in the exercise of the profession and in the threat to patriarchal societies posed by women wishing to study and delaying marriage and childbirth. The evidence analysed provides no specific information about the stereotypes assigned to women who decide to enter nursing, although the results obtained for men do reveal this information.
Men experience social judgement over the role they are expected to perform both personally and professionally. They are assigned a productive role, distancing them from elements related to the female role (caring, empathy, physical or emotional proximity, etc.). Our analysis shows that men who decide to enter the nursing profession face two main types of prejudice: they are viewed as not working in a profession appropriate to men and suspicions are aroused as to their sexual orientation and masculinity. According to other studies, men also experience these prejudices in other professions considered “feminine”. Our results reveal that men respond to this discrimination by: deciding not to enter these disciplines, which increases the gender gap and encourages feminisation in certain fields; participating in these disciplines, but aspiring to management or leadership positions; or accepting that they will be subject to discrimination because of their profession. Male representation in positions of responsibility is not unique to nursing and can also be observed in other professions and healthcare disciplines, where management and leadership positions are held by individuals who are not representative of the overall profession.
Male nurses are not only judged for working in a so-called ‘female’ profession, they are also questioned within the nursing discipline for working in areas such as paediatrics, maternity, and gynaecology, in which they are believed to diverge from their natural male role and pose a potential sexual threat to the patients in their care. This sexual threat, viewed as innate to men in the articles analysed, reflects the current social debate on the nature of the male sexual impulse and men’s predisposition to sexually abuse women.
The literature analysed also highlighted the prejudices held by members of the nursing profession itself, which include: lower value than other healthcare disciplines; low-skilled profession or subordinate to other healthcare professions; working conditions, such as low pay and professional esteem; and ignorance of the tasks actually performed by nurses. López-Verdugo and colleagues found that this discriminatory vision of the nursing profession derived primarily from the portrayal of the profession in the media, social media, and social information. The value of nursing in society has risen as a result of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but this has not been reflected in nurses’ pay nor in the real value or recognition of their professional activity.
The review reveals the current view of stereotypes associated with the nursing profession and its professionals. This allows planning interventions that could change the image attributed, depending on social contexts. It seems that the actions which will generate this change should be aimed at promoting real knowledge of the skills of the profession and the leadership of its professionals. For this purpose, a real image of nursing professionals should be projected in all media, including the functions and areas of work for which they have the competencies and training, and the responsibilities they have for multidisciplinary teams, without gender linkage. The image should show a profession in which men and women can work together and in which the skills, and not the gender of the professional, are those that mark the functions that each one can perform. The sessions and open days, held by the universities for the recruitment of future students, are another opportunity to introduce leading and prestigious nursing professionals, in addition to showing real nursing. Moreover, nursing universities have an important mission because they must promote an excellent acquisition of professional skills among their students, without defined gender. This aspect should be transversal and should be oriented both theoretical and practical teaching. Finally, a real participation of nursing professionals in service management and health policy planning should be encouraged. These are areas where male nurses should not have priority over female nurses. Action can also be taken, from official organizations in the media and education centers, to ensure that not only feminine terms are used to refer to nursing professionals.
This review has a number of limitations. Firstly, backward snowballing was not used to identify other relevant articles. Secondly, the different methodologies used in the selected studies made it difficult to compare their results. Finally, the cultural and geographical differences present in the selected studies may have produced a number of discrepancies between their results, as the topics were cultural constructs.
5. Conclusions
Nursing is considered a women’s profession, limiting male participation. It is perceived as a low-skilled, low-prestige, poorly paid profession requiring little academic training, which is easy to enter. Nursing is also viewed as a profession lacking autonomy and subordinate to the medical profession.
The work carried out by nurses is assigned a low value by society as it is regarded as being suitable for women, who are not considered competent for management roles. In some cultural contexts, the decision to become a nurse can lead to delays in starting a family.
Male nurses encounter different stereotypes, which question their masculinity, their control over their sexual impulses, and their professional competence. More patriarchal religious and cultural contexts are associated with harsher stereotypes of male nurses.
The most effective way of reducing stereotypes and bias in the nursing profession is to portray it as a scientific discipline in which both men and women can establish their careers, highlighting the development, level of specialisation, and areas of work involved in the discipline. Appropriate channels for this awareness-raising work include interventions from universities at recruitment days, the public image portrayed in the media, and participation in healthcare policies.
References 64
- 1.
Ellemers N. Gender Stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2018;69:275-298.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
- 2.
Haines E.L., Deaux K., Lofaro N. The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychol. Women Q. 2016;40:353-363.
Not in our library10.1177/0361684316634081
- 3.
Kite M.E., Deaux K., Haines E.L. Gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories. 2008.
Not in our library
- 4.
Ramos M.D.B., Riera J.R.M., González G.M. Gender attitudes and stereotypes in nursing. Cult. Cuid. 2010;28:39-48.
Not in our library10.7184/cuid.2010.28.06
- 5.
Du H., Xiao Y., Zhao L. Education and gender role attitudes. J. Popul. Econ. 2021;34:475-513.
Not in our library10.1007/s00148-020-00793-3
- 6.
Ward L.M., Grower P. Media and the Development of Gender Role Stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 2020;2:177-199.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051120-010630
- 7.
Gimeno M.D.C.M., Rodríguez R.C., Ferrer B.M. Stereotypes, gender roles and chain of care. Transformations in women’s migratory process. Collect. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 2019;6:83-97.
Not in our library10.15648/coll.1.2019.06
- 8.
Rice L., Barth J.M. A Tale of Two Gender Roles: The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Gender Role Traditionalism and Occupational Stereotype on Hiring Decisions. Gend. Issues. 2017;34:86-102.
Not in our library10.1007/s12147-016-9175-4
- 9.
Rodríguez A.S. From the pink cup to the object. Around gender building. Econ. Creat. 2018;10:184-203.
Not in our library10.46840/ec.2018.10.08
- 10.
Cuddy A.J., Glick P., Beninger A. The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 2011;31:73-98.
Not in our library10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004
- 11.
Arif S., Khokhar S. A historical glance: Challenges for male nurses. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2017;67:1889-1894.
Not in our library
- 12.
World Health Organization. Delivered by Women, Led by Men: A Gender and Equity Analysis of the Global Health and Social Workforce. 2019.
Not in our library
- 13.
Aranda M., Castillo-Mayén M.D.R., Montes-Berges B. Has Changed the Traditional Social Perception on Nurses? Attribution of Stereotypes and Gender Roles. Acción Psicol. 2015;12:103-112.
Not in our library10.5944/ap.12.1.14353
- 14.
Hoeve Y.T., Jansen G., Roodbol P. The nursing profession: Public image, self-concept and professional identity. J. Adv. Nurs. 2013;70:295-309.
Not in our library10.1111/jan.12177
- 15.
Girvin J., Jackson D., Hutchinson M. Contemporary public perceptions of nursing: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the international research evidence. J. Nurs. Manag. 2016;24:994-1006.
Not in our library10.1111/jonm.12413
- 16.
Glerean N., Hupli M., Talman K., Haavisto E. Young peoples’ perceptions of the nursing profession: An integrative review. Nurse Educ. Today. 2017;57:95-102.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.008
- 17.
López-Verdugo M., Ponce-Blandón J., López-Narbona F., Romero-Castillo R., Guerra-Martín M. Social Image of Nursing. An Integrative Review about a Yet Unknown Profession. Nurs. Rep. 2021;11:43.
Not in our library10.3390/nursrep11020043
- 18.
De Souza R. Review: Nurses’ views on the impact of mass media on the public perception of nursing and nurse–Service user interactions. J. Res. Nurs. 2017;22:597-598.
Not in our library10.1177/1744987117736600
- 19.
Terry D., Peck B., Carden C., Perkins A., Smith A. Traversing the Funambulist’s Fine Line between Nursing and Male Identity: A Systematic Review of the Factors that Influence Men as They Seek to Navigate the Nursing Profession. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2020;10:51.
Not in our library10.3390/ejihpe10030051
- 20.
Smith B.W., Rojo J., Everett B., Montayre J., Sierra J., Salamonson Y. Professional success of men in the nursing workforce: An integrative review. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021;29:2470-2488.
Not in our library10.1111/jonm.13445
- 21.
Whittemore R., Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005;52:546-553.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
- 22.
Hong Q., Pluye P., Fábregues S., Bartlett G., Boardman F., Cargo M., Dagenais P., Gagnon M.-P., Griffiths F., Nicolau B., et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT); Version 2018. 2018.
Not in our library
- 23.
- 24.
Kim I.-J., Kim S.-H., Sohn S.-K. Societal perceptions of male nurses in South Korea: A Q-methodological study. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2016;14:219-230.
Not in our library10.1111/jjns.12152
- 25.
Kane D., Rajacich D., Andary C. Exploring the Contextual Factors Surrounding the Recruitment and Retention of Men in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program. Nurs. Forum. 2020;56:24-29.
Not in our library10.1111/nuf.12504
- 26.
Rabie T., Rossouw L., Machobane B.F. Exploring occupational gender-role stereotypes of male nurses: A South African study. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2020;27:e12890.
Not in our library10.1111/ijn.12890
- 27.
Baker M.J., Fisher M.J., Pryor J. Potential for misinterpretation: An everyday problem male nurses encounter in inpatient rehabilitation. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2021;28:e12985.
Not in our library10.1111/ijn.12985
- 28.
Nogueira I.C., Santos D.D.S., Sanfelice C.F.D.O., Silva E.M., Assis A.E.S.Q. Gender debate as a challenge in nursing training. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2021;74:e20201001.
Not in our library10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1001
- 29.
Saleh M.Y., Al-Amer R., Al Ashram S.R., Dawani H., Randall S. Exploring the lived experience of Jordanian male nurses: A phenomenological study. Nurs. Outlook. 2020;68:313-323.
Not in our library10.1016/j.outlook.2019.10.007
- 30.
Alexander R.K., Diefenbeck C. Challenging stereotypes: A glimpse into nursing’s difficulty recruiting African Americans. J. Prof. Nurs. 2020;36:15-22.
Not in our library10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.06.010
- 31.
Mao A., Wang J., Zhang Y., Cheong P.L., Van I.K., Tam H.L. Factors influencing recruitment and retention of male nurses in Macau and mainland China: A collaborative, qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2020;19:104.
Not in our library10.1186/s12912-020-00497-9
- 32.
Woods-Giscombe C.L., Rowsey P.J., Kneipp S., Lackey C., Bravo L. Student perspectives on recruiting underrepresented ethnic minority students to nursing: Enhancing outreach, engaging family, and correcting misconceptions. J. Prof. Nurs. 2020;36:43-49.
Not in our library10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.006
- 33.
Jamieson I., Harding T., Withington J., Hudson D. Men entering nursing: Has anything changed? Nurs. Prax. N. Z. 2019;35:18-29.
Not in our library10.36951/ngpxnz.2019.007
- 34.
Ndou N.P., Moloko-Phiri S.S. Four-year diploma male students’ experiences in a profession traditionally perceived as a female domain at a selected public college of nursing in Limpopo, South Africa. Curationis. 2018;41:a1932.
Not in our library10.4102/curationis.v41i1.1932
- 35.
Cheng M.-L., Tseng Y.-H., Hodges E., Chou F.-H. Lived Experiences of Novice Male Nurses in Taiwan. J. Transcult. Nurs. 2016;29:46-53.
Not in our library10.1177/1043659616676318
- 36.
Liu H.-Y., Li Y.L. Crossing the gender boundaries: The gender experiences of male nursing students in initial nursing clinical practice in Taiwan. Nurse Educ. Today. 2017;58:72-77.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.006
- 37.
Yang C.-I., Yu H.-Y., Chin Y., Lee L.-H. There is nothing wrong with being a nurse: The experiences of male nursing students in Taiwan. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2017;14:332-340.
Not in our library10.1111/jjns.12162
- 38.
Kluczyńska U. Motives for choosing and resigning from nursing by men and the definition of masculinity: A qualitative study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2017;73:1366-1376.
Not in our library10.1111/jan.13240
- 39.
Liaw S.Y., Wu L.T., Holroyd E., Wang W., Lopez V., Lim S., Chow Y.L. Why not nursing? Factors influencing healthcare career choice among Singaporean students. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2016;63:530-538.
Not in our library10.1111/inr.12312
- 40.
Marcinowicz L., Owlasiuk A., Perkowska E. Exploring the ways experienced nurses in Poland view their profession: A focus group study. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2016;63:336-343.
Not in our library10.1111/inr.12294
Cited by papers we hold 2
- Enablers and barriers in the professional development of nurses employed full-time at university nursing studies in Croatia: a qualitative study · 2025Not checked
- Primary care’s standardized language use: contributions to advanced nursing practices / Uso de linguagem padronizada na atenção primária: contribuições para as práticas avançadas de enfermagem · 2023Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.