Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary

Elise Van Kempen, Maribel Casas, Göran Pershagen and 1 more

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2018 · Systematic review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/ijerph15020379

Abstract

To update the current state of evidence and assess its quality, we conducted a systematic review on the effects of environmental noise exposure on the cardio-metabolic systems as input for the new WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European Region. We identified 600 references relating to studies on effects of noise from road, rail and air traffic, and wind turbines on the cardio-metabolic system, published between January 2000 and August 2015. Only 61 studies, investigating different end points, included information enabling estimation of exposure response relationships. These studies were used for meta-analyses, and assessments of the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A majority of the studies concerned traffic noise and hypertension, but most were cross-sectional and suffering from a high risk of bias. The most comprehensive evidence was available for road traffic noise and Ischeamic Heart Diseases (IHD). Combining the results of 7 longitudinal studies revealed a Relative Risk (RR) of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01–1.15) per 10 dB (LDEN) for the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of IHD. We rated the quality of this evidence as high. Only a few studies reported on the association between transportation noise and stroke, diabetes, and/or obesity. The quality of evidence for these associations was rated from moderate to very low, depending on transportation noise source and outcome. For a comprehensive assessment of the impact of noise exposure on the cardiovascular and metabolic system, we need more and better quality evidence, primarily based on longitudinal studies.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1.1. Aim

In this paper, we present the main results of a systematic review of the literature dealing with observational studies on the association between environmental noise exposure and the cardiovascular and metabolic systems. The aim was to update some of the existing exposure-response relationships, and to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. The World Health Organisation (WHO) commissioned this systematic review. Its results form important input for the new environmental noise guidelines for the European Region. The WHO requires that new guidelines should be based on the latest scientific knowledge. The complete review can be found in the report published at the website of RIVM (the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) via the following link: http://www.rivm.nl/en/Documents_and_publications/Scientific/Reports/2017/november/Cardiovascular_and_metabolic_effects_of_environmental_noise_Systematic_evidence_review_in_the_framework_of_the_development_of_the_WHO_environmental_noise_guidelines_for_the_European_Region.

1.2. Background

During the past decades, several national and international organizations have made recommendations for protecting human health from the adverse effects of environmental noise exposure. In the existing guidelines, the principal noise source of concern was transportation noise, mainly road and air traffic. The health impact of other noise sources, such as rail traffic and wind turbines, was not addressed in these guidelines. However, with the ongoing extension of railway transport facilities, and the substantial growth of wind energy facilities, the number of studies on the impact of noise from rail traffic noise and on wind turbine noise has increased.

The existing guidelines also contain recommendations that specifically deal with the impact of noise on the cardiovascular system. The most common explanation for the effects of noise on the heart and circulatory system, is stress. The cardiovascular effects related to noise exposure may also be the consequence of a decrease in sleep quality, caused by noise exposure during the night, among other additional or interrelated mechanisms. Such reactions may also affect the metabolic system.

The most recent environmental noise guidelines from WHO, date back to 2009, and focus on night-time exposure. Meanwhile, new evidence on the relationship between noise exposure and cardiovascular effects has accumulated. Hypertension and ischaemic heart disease have been the main outcomes of concern in observational studies on the impact of noise on the cardiovascular system. In addition, an increasing amount of studies have recently investigated the impact of noise on other cardiovascular end-points such as stroke. Furthermore, hypertension is considered as an important risk factor for other cardiovascular outcomes such as stroke and myocardial infarction. Amongst the newly published studies there were also several studies dealing with the possible effects of noise on the metabolic system, in particular with regard to outcomes such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.

In addition, a number of the newly published studies investigated the combined effects of noise and air pollution. People living close to roads, are exposed not only to traffic noise, but also to air pollution generated by traffic. Previous studies have shown a relationship between air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Since air pollution and noise from road traffic share the same source, cardiovascular effects could be attributed to both exposure factors.

The existing environmental noise guidelines also include recommendations that aim to reduce environmental noise exposure in settings where children spend most of their time. However, none of these recommendations takes into account the cardiovascular effects of noise on children. It is possible that people exposed to high levels of noise from an early age, might be at higher risk for cardiovascular problems later in life. Since the publication of the latest environmental noise guidelines in 1999, the number of studies investigating the impact of noise on children’s blood pressure has increased substantially.

2.1. Evaluation of Existing Reviews

The first step in this systematic review was to identify and select reviews of “sufficient” quality, that described the impact of exposure to environmental noise from several sources (air, road, rail and wind turbines) on the cardiovascular or metabolic systems, in different settings (at home, at school), and populations (e.g., adults, children).

After an extended search, we identified 37 reviews evaluating available studies into the impact of exposure to environmental noise on the cardiovascular or metabolic systems. By means of the “Measurement tool for the Assessment of Multiple SysTemAtic Reviews” (AMSTAR) we evaluated their quality, and based on the relevance for this whole systematic review, we selected 15 reviews. We carried out the evaluation in duplicate (Elise van Kempen and Maria Foraster, and then discussed the results afterwards.

It appeared that most of the studies covered by the selected reviews, reported on the impacts of road and aircraft noise exposure among adults. Nine reviews included one or more meta-analyses, resulting in more than 13 exposure-response relationships. For most available exposure-response relations, the reviewers were not able to provide a quality judgement of the individual studies. For a number of (new) health end-points (e.g., obesity) and/or noise sources (e.g., rail traffic, no reviews or exposure-response relationships were available.

Following the results of the evaluation of existing reviews, we decided to carry out a new systematic review on the impact of noise on the cardiovascular and metabolic system in order to update some of the existing exposure-response relationships, and to assess the quality of the existing evidence.

2.2.1. Identification and Selection

We identified observational studies on the impact of noise from air, road, and rail traffic and wind turbines on the cardiovascular or metabolic systems published from 2000 until October 2014 in several literature databases (Medline/PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and SCISCEARCH (see Appendix A for the applied search profiles). To ensure that most of the studies could be identified, we manually scanned reports and proceedings in the fields of epidemiology, and noise and health. We supplemented the results of this search with studies that were already identified by means of the 15 reviews, which we evaluated during the first step of this systematic review (see Section 2.1). Overall, we identified more than 600 publications which were screened in duplicate (Elise van Kempen and Maria Foraster) using predefined criteria. We selected 61 studies for data-extraction, where detailed quantitative information was available on exposure and health outcomes, enabling estimation of exposure-response relationships. However, conducting a systematic review often takes a lot of time. While working on this review, new results became publically available. In order to keep our results more up to date, it was decided to extend our study material with more recent results beyond the studies that had we already identified for the period 2000–October 2014. However, only updated and new results of studies published between November 2014 and August 2015, were included and processed. Consequently, we were able to include the latest results published between November 2014 and August 2015 of several selected studies: DEBATS, REGICOR, SDPP, HUBRO and DCH. In- and exclusion criteria were extensively described in the complete systematic review.

2.2.2. Data Extraction

From the selected 61 studies (described in 113 records), we extracted the following data via a structured data extraction form:Data on general study characteristics (e.g., study design, study period, study location);Population characteristics (sampling of the study population, number of participants, response- and attrition rate, gender, age;Exposure assessment and health outcome assessment, and;The results of the study.

Data on general study characteristics (e.g., study design, study period, study location);

Population characteristics (sampling of the study population, number of participants, response- and attrition rate, gender, age;

Exposure assessment and health outcome assessment, and;

The results of the study.

We carried out the data extraction in duplicate (Elise van Kempen, Maribel Casas and/or Göran Pershagen) and then discussed the results, with the exception of studies on the impact of wind turbine noise (n = 3) and studies on the impact of noise on children’s blood pressure. For those studies data, extraction was carried out by one person only (Elise van Kempen).

In the selected studies we evaluated the risk of bias by means of a checklist developed by the WHO: (i) information bias due to exposure assessment; (ii) bias due to confounding; (iii) bias due to selection of participants; (iv) information bias due to non-objective health outcome assessment, and (v) information bias due to non-blinded health outcome assessment. A protocol of how the studies were scored on each of these five items can be found in Section 3.3 of the complete evidence review available via the link specified in Section 1.1. For each study, the evaluation was carried out independently by two or three reviewers (Elise van Kempen, Maribel Casas and Göran Pershagen). From the scores on the different items, we calculated a total risk of bias score (see also Appendix B for an overview of the risk of bias scores per study).

The main effects under investigation were hypertension, IHD, stroke, type 2 diabetes, change in body mass index (BMI), change in waist circumference, and change in mean blood pressure in children. In order to make a comparison between the studies, we expressed their results in a uniform way and calculated the following outcome variables:For studies on the impact of noise on hypertension, IHD, stroke or type 2 diabetes, we calculated the natural logarithm of the Relative Risk (RR) and its variance per 10 dB(A);For studies on the impact of noise on children’s blood pressure, we calculated the blood pressure change (mmHg for a noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure; andFor studies on the impact of noise on obesity markers BMI and waist circumference, we calculated the change in BMI (kg/m2) per noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance, and the change in waist circumference (cm) per noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance.

For studies on the impact of noise on hypertension, IHD, stroke or type 2 diabetes, we calculated the natural logarithm of the Relative Risk (RR) and its variance per 10 dB(A);

For studies on the impact of noise on children’s blood pressure, we calculated the blood pressure change (mmHg for a noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure; and

For studies on the impact of noise on obesity markers BMI and waist circumference, we calculated the change in BMI (kg/m2) per noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance, and the change in waist circumference (cm) per noise level increase of 10 dB(A) and its variance.

To retain the link with the European Noise Directive (END, we expressed noise exposure in LDEN. However, most studies did not report an RR per 10 dB (LDEN). Where noise exposure was expressed by means of another noise indicator than LDEN (e.g., LAeq,16hr or LAeq,24hr), a conversion to LDEN was needed. Appendix II of the complete review gives an overview of the conversion rules that we applied.

2.2.3. Data Aggregation

For data-aggregation, we included only estimates from studies that were well matched, adjusted, or stratified for at least age and sex. If more than one risk estimate was available for a study, we used the estimates for men and women separately and for separate age-categories, where possible. After selecting the study estimates, we calculated a pooled estimate using the STATA-command METAN to fit a random-effects model. To test consistency of the effect estimates across studies, we used Cochran’s Q-test. We calculated the I2-statistic to reflect the percentage of between-study heterogeneity. For some outcomes, we were able to investigate how the summary estimates were affected by sources of heterogeneity. To this end, we carried out a meta-regression analysis using the STATA-command METAREG. Where meta-regression analyses were not possible, we carried out sub-group analyses.

When enough study estimates were available, we attempted to give insight in the extent of publication-bias by means of funnel plots: scatter plots of the studies’ effect estimates (RR per 10 dB) against the inverse of the standard error. Also we applied Egger’s test of publication bias using the STATA-commands METAFUNNEL and METABIAS.

2.2.4. Assessment of the Quality of Evidence: GRADE

The WHO required us to assess the quality of the evidence that has been retrieved in this review. In other words, we had to assess to what extent we were confident that an estimate of an association between noise and an outcome is likely or unlikely to be changed by further research.

To this end, we applied a modified version of the GRADE considerations: a systematic and explicit approach to making judgements about quality of evidence. In summary, for every outcome, we had to assess the quality of evidence according to several criteria (e.g., study design, study quality, consistency and precision of the results, directness of the evidence, publication bias, whether an exposure-response gradient was present, the magnitude of the effect found, and possible confounding. The scores for the different GRADE criteria are presented in Appendix C to Appendix H as well in Appendices III–VIII of the complete systematic review. How we adapted GRADE for this systematic review is extensively described in Chapter 10 of the complete evidence review. The main divergence from GRADE was that the initial level of certainty was rated “high” for cohort and case-control studies, “low” for cross-sectional studies and “very low” for ecological studies. Furthermore, we upgraded the evidence if the relative risk was 1.5 or higher, but downgraded if based on only one study. GRADE has four levels for the quality of evidence, ranging from “very low” to “high” (see Table 1). The level of the quality of evidence will be linked with the guideline values and recommendations that WHO will include in their environmental noise guidelines.

3. Results: Main Findings and Weighing the Quality of the Evidence

In this section, for each outcome the main findings of the review and the conclusions of the weighing of the evidence are presented. The report with the complete findings including the systematic evaluation of the included studies, and the reasoning behind the weighing of the evidence, can be found in the complete systematic review.

A note for the reader: since we carried out the literature search for this systematic review, new studies have been published that investigate the associations between transportation noise exposure and metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, owing to time constraints, we were not able to carry out a structured and extensive additional search for new studies published in the period November 2014–March 2017. However, in order to identify at least some of the new studies we were missing, we carried out a search on SCOPUS in March 2017. For this, we applied the same SCOPUS-search profile as was used to identify studies for the current review. In an “ideal” systematic review, we should have included the results of these newly identified studies in the results of the current review, and where necessary updated our results. However, due to time constraints, we have not yet been able to systematically evaluate the newly identified studies. Nevertheless, we have decided to present their results in a narrative way, and attempted to assess how they affect the results of the current review. The differences in results with these recent studies and earlier reviews are described in detail for each outcome in the complete systematic review.

3.1. Hypertension

We evaluated 40 studies that investigated the impact of noise from air, road, and rail traffic and wind turbines on the risk of hypertension. Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables. Appendix C presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 2).

There were positive associations between noise from air, road, or rail traffic and hypertension in the cross-sectional studies, which formed the largest part (n = 38) of the available evidence (Table 2). After aggregating the results of 26 studies (comprising 154,398 individuals, including 18,957 cases), we derived an RR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02–1.08) per 10 dB (LDEN) for the association between road traffic noise and the prevalence of hypertension. The studies were carried out within the range of approximately 20–80 dB (LDEN). For aircraft noise (nine studies), we estimated an RR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.95–1.17) per 10 dB (LDEN) (comprising 60,121 residents, including 9487). For rail traffic noise (five studies), we derived an RR of 1.05 (95% CI: 0.88–1.26) per 10 dB (LDEN) (comprising of 15,850 individuals, including 2059 cases of hypertension). Although there was evidence for moderate to high heterogeneity among studies, the meta-regression analyses could not reveal clear sources for this observed heterogeneity.

Despite the fact that most studies were able to adjust for important confounders, and were able to ascertain individual exposure levels, we rated the quality of the evidence from the cross-sectional studies mainly as “very low”. This is, among other reasons, because the response rate in many of the studies was lower than 60%. Furthermore, most studies ascertained hypertension by means of self-report only.

In the two evaluated cohort studies that investigated the impact of traffic noise on hypertension, no increased risks were found of hypertension related to traffic noise exposure. This is confirmed by a recent meta-analysis, including individual data from six cohort studies on the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of hypertension. The reason for this apparent discrepancy in the findings between the cross-sectional and cohort studies is unclear.

Overall, we consider the quality of the evidence supporting an association between traffic noise exposure and hypertension as “very low”, indicating that any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

3.2. Ischaemic Heart Disease

We evaluated 22 studies that investigated the association between exposure to noise from air, road, and rail traffic and IHD. Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables, and Appendix D presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 3). The majority (n = 11) were of cross-sectional design.

The studies that investigated the impact of air traffic noise found indications of an increased risk of IHD. Exposure to aircraft noise was associated with the prevalence of IHD, the incidence of IHD, and mortality due to IHD. Only the association between aircraft noise and the incidence of IHD was statistically significant. We estimated an RR of 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04–1.15) per 10 dB (LDEN) after aggregating the results of two studies comprising of 9,619,082 participants, including 158,977 incident cases of IHD. Since most studies on the impact of aircraft noise were of ecological and cross-sectional design (see Table 3), the quality of the evidence from these studies was mostly rated as “very low”. However, the results of the current review are consistent with the results of new longitudinal studies, which reported positive associations between aircraft noise and mortality due to IHD.

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between air traffic noise and IHD as “low”, indicating that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

We found evidence that noise from road traffic is associated with an increased risk of IHD. An increase in road traffic noise was associated with significant increases in the prevalence of IHD, and the incidence of IHD. The evidence for a relationship between noise from road traffic and the incidence of IHD was the most robust. After combining the results of three cohort studies and four case-control studies (comprising 67,224 participants, including 7033 incident cases of IHD, we found an RR of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01–1.15) per 10 dB (LDEN) for the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of IHD within the range of approximately 40–80 dB LDEN. This means that if road traffic noise levels increase from 40 to 80 dB (LDEN), the RR = 1.36. We rated the quality of the evidence that comes from these studies to be “high”. Supporting evidence came from studies on the association between road traffic noise and the prevalence of IHD. We rated the quality of evidence from these studies as low. The results of the current review are strengthened by the results of several recently published longitudinal studies.

A visualization of the shape of the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of IHD, indicated that the risk of IHD increases continuously for road traffic noise levels from about 50 dB (LDEN). This is consistent with the findings of another recent meta-analysis on the association between road traffic noise and IHD. The WHO guidelines of 1999 stated the following: “epidemiological studies show that cardiovascular effects occur after long-term exposure to noise with LAeq,24hr values of 65–70 dB”. In the WHO Night-noise guidelines, published in 2009, a general threshold of 55 dB (LNight) was recommended for protection of cardiovascular disease.

Overall, taking into account all available evidence on the association between road traffic noise on IHD, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between road traffic noise and IHD to be “moderate”, indicating that further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. However, for road traffic noise and the incidence of IHD, the quality of the evidence was rated as high.

Compared with noise from road and air traffic, we found only a few studies that investigated the impact of noise from rail traffic. These had a cross-sectional design. After aggregating the results of the studies on the association between rail traffic noise and the prevalence of IHD, we found a non-significant RR of 1.18 per 10 dB (LDEN).

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between exposure to noise from rail traffic and IHD to be “very low”, indicating that any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

3.3. Stroke

Compared with the number of studies on the impact of noise on hypertension and IHD, relatively few studies were available that investigated the impact on stroke (n = 9). Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables, and Appendix E presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 4).

According to the results of the ecological and cross-sectional studies an increase in aircraft noise was associated with an increase in the prevalence and the incidence of stroke. None of these associations was statistically significant (see Table 4). The observations found for the prevalence and incidence of stroke were supported by the ecological studies on the association between air traffic noise and mortality due to stroke.

No association between air traffic noise exposure and mortality due to stroke was observed in the evaluated cohort study. This is consistent with the results of new longitudinal studies, which showed no clear indications of an association between aircraft noise and mortality due to stroke.

The results of the studies that investigated the impact of road traffic were not consistent. Only for the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of stroke, there was a statistically significant RR of 1.14 (95% CI 1.03–1.25) per 10 dB (LDEN). This result was based on one cohort study, comprising 51,485 participants, including 1881 incident cases of stroke.

In the evaluated cross-sectional and ecological studies on the association between road traffic noise and the prevalence of stroke or mortality due to stroke, no increased risks of stroke due to road traffic noise were observed. This was not consistent with the results of recently published longitudinal studies, which showed that an increase in road traffic noise was statistically significantly associated with an increase in mortality due to stroke. As part of the current review, only one cross-sectional study was evaluated, which investigated the association between rail traffic noise and the prevalence of stroke.

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between traffic noise and stroke to be “low”. This indicates that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

3.4. Diabetes

For the current review, we were able to evaluate seven studies that investigated the association between environmental noise and the risk of diabetes. Four studies investigated the possible impact of transportation (air, road, rail traffic noise. Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables, and Appendix F presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 5).

We found two studies that investigated the impact of air traffic noise on the occurrence of diabetes. In a cross-sectional study on the association between air traffic noise and the prevalence of diabetes, a non-significant RR of 1.01 per 10 dB (LDEN) was found. In the evaluated cohort study on the association between air traffic noise and the incidence of diabetes, no increased risk of diabetes due to air traffic noise was observed (see Table 5).

We found indications that noise from road traffic increases the risk of diabetes. The two evaluated cross-sectional studies showed an increasing but non-significant trend of the prevalence of diabetes with road traffic noise exposure. In the evaluated cohort study, an increase in road traffic noise was statistically significantly associated with an increase in the incidence of diabetes. An RR of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.02–1.14) per 10 dB (LDEN) across a noise range of approximately 50–70 dB (LDEN) was estimated.

Remarkably, an increase in rail traffic noise was associated with a decrease in the risk of diabetes in one cross-sectional study while a cohort study found no statistically significant association.

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between traffic noise and diabetes to be “low”. This indicates that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

3.5. Obesity

The number of evaluated studies that investigated the impact of noise on markers of obesity was limited to four: one cohort study and three cross-sectional studies. Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables, and Appendix G presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 6). All the studies showed that an increase in traffic noise was associated with an increase in obesity markers, although, according to one study, this was present only in certain subgroups. In the cohort study, an increase in aircraft noise of 10 dB (LDEN) was associated with a significant increase in waist circumference of 3.46 (95% CI: 2.13–4.77) cm during 8 to 10 years of follow-up (see Table 6). The evidence of traffic noise affecting obesity markers is strengthened by the results of two recent longitudinal studies.

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between traffic noise and markers of obesity, respectively, as “low”. This indicates that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

3.6. Blood Pressure in Children

We evaluated eight studies investigating the impact of noise on children’s blood pressure. Appendix B presents the separate risk of bias tables, and Appendix H presents the different GRADE tables (summarized in Table 7). Seven studies were cross-sectional; one study reported both the results of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. With the exception of the association between road traffic noise at school and systolic blood pressure, we observed positive but non-significant associations between exposure to road traffic noise and blood pressure (see Table 7). No combined exposure-response estimate could be computed from the studies on the impact of aircraft noise, since no quantitative results were provided in one of the studies.

Overall, we rate the quality of the evidence supporting an association between traffic noise and blood pressure in children, as “very low”, indicating that any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

3.7. Wind Turbine Noise

Overall, we evaluated only three cross-sectional studies that investigated the impact of noise from wind turbines on the cardiovascular and metabolic systems. Important limitations of these studies were the low response rates (two studies had response rates of less than 60%) and, the fact that in all studies the cardiovascular or metabolic endpoint was ascertained by questionnaire or interview. In these studies, we observed that an increase in wind turbine noise was associated with non-significant increases in self-reported hypertension and non-significant decreases in self-reported cardiovascular disease. For self-reported diabetes, the results appeared inconsistent.

Overall, we rate the quality of the studies supporting an association between exposure from wind turbine noise and adverse effects in the cardiovascular or metabolic system as “very low”, indicating that any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

4. Discussion

The current review shows that a large number of studies have investigated the impact of noise on the cardiovascular system, but applying the GRADE, the quality of the evidence is often rated as relatively low. This does not mean that exposure to noise has no effect on the cardiovascular system, but encourages further research to improve the quality of the evidence. After all, there is a strong biological plausibility that noise affects human health. Furthermore, in many of the evaluated studies, we observed statistically significant associations between noise and cardiovascular endpoints. The most robust were the effects of road traffic noise in relation to IHD. Combining the results of 7 longitudinal studies, revealed an RR of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01–1.15) per 10 dB (LDEN) for the association between road traffic noise and the incidence of IHD. We rated the quality of the evidence from these longitudinal studies as high. Supporting evidence came from studies on the association between road traffic noise and the prevalence of IHD.

Several recent reviews have been published on cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure, which are described in detail in the full systematic review. The quantitative results regarding exposure-response relationships following meta-analyses agree well with our review. However, most earlier reviews did not include a detailed quality assessment of individual studies.

This review also addressed the possible impact of noise on the metabolic system. In comparison with the studies on the impact of noise on the cardiovascular system, the number of available studies was rather limited. The results of these studies were not always consistent. In addition, the quality of the evidence was rather low. It is therefore, at this moment too early to draw definite conclusions with regard to the impact of noise on the metabolic system.

5. Conclusions

The results of the current review shows that at this moment, not enough studies of good quality are available that investigated the impact of noise on the cardiovascular and metabolic system. The plausibility of an association calls for further efforts with improved research. In order to improve the quality of the existing evidence, more studies with a cohort or case-control design are needed.

In order to improve the quality of the existing evidence, we also recommend that more well designed studies on health effects in relation to exposure to wind turbines and rail traffic noise are set up and carried out.

References 159

  1. 1.

    Van Kempen E.E.M.M., Casas M., Pershagen G., Foraster M. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of Environmental Noise. Systematic Envidence Review in the Framework of the Development of the WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. 2017.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Berglund B., Lindvall T., Schwela D.H. Guidelines for Community Noise. 1999.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. Night Noise Guidelines for Europe. 2009.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Health Council of The Netherlands. Effects of Noise on Sleep and Health. 2004.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Health Council of The Netherlands: Committee on Noise and Health. Noise and Health. 1994.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Münzel T., Sørensen M., Gori T., Schmidt F.P., Rao X., Brook J., Chen L.C., Brook R.D., Rajagopalan S. Environmental stressors and cardiometabolic disease: Part I—Epidemiologic evidence supporting a role for noise and air pollution and effects of mitigation strategies. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:550-556.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehw269

  7. 7.

    Brook R.D., Newby D.E., Rajagopalan S. Air pollution and cardiometabolic disease: An update and call for clinical trials. Am. J. Hypertens. 2017;31:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajh/hpx109

  8. 8.
    Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews · 2007
    No notice
  9. 9.

    Tétreault L.F., Perron S., Smargiassi A. Cardiovascular health, traffic-related air pollution and noise: Are associations mutually confounded? A systematic review. Int. J. Public Health. 2013;58:649-666.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00038-013-0489-7

  10. 10.

    Paunović K., Stansfeld S., Clark C., Belojević G. Epidemiological studies on noise and blood pressure in children: Observations and suggestions. Environ. Int. 2011;37:1030-1041.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2011.03.017

  11. 11.

    Hohmann C., Grabenhenrich L., de Kluizenaar Y., Tischer C., Heinrich J., Chen C.M., Thijs C., Nieuwenhuijsen M., Keil T. Health effects of chronic noise exposure in pregnancy and childhood: A systematic review inititated by ENRIECO. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2013;216:217-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.06.001

  12. 12.

    Ndrepepa A., Twardella D. Relationship between noise annoyance from road traffic noise and cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2011;13:251-259.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.80163

  13. 13.

    Babisch W., van Kamp I. Exposure-response relationship of the association between aircraft noise and the risk of hypertension. Noise Health. 2009;11:161-168.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.53363

  14. 14.

    Babisch W. Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise Health. 2008;10:27-33.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.39005

  15. 15.
    The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. · 2002
    No notice
  16. 16.

    Argalášová-Sobotová L., Lekaviciute J., Jeram S., Ševčiková L., Jurkovičová J. Environmental noise and cardiovascular disease in adults: Research in Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe and Newly Independent States. Noise Health. 2013;15:22-31.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.107149

  17. 17.
    Updated exposure-response relationship between road traffic noise and coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis · 2014
    Not checked
  18. 18.

    Merlin T., Newton S., Ellery B., Milverton J., Farah C. Systematic Review of the Human Health Effects of Wind Farms. 2013.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Babisch W. Transportation Noise and Cardiovascular Risk. Review and Synthesis of Epidemiological Studies. Dose-Effect Curve and Risk Estimation. 2006.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.32464

  20. 20.

    Vienneau D., Perez L., Schindler C., Probst-Hensch N., Röösli M. The relationship between traffic noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Vienneau D., Schindler C., Perez L., Probst-Hensch N., Roosli M. The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2015;138:372-380.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.023

  22. 22.

    Van Kempen E., Babisch W. The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: A meta-analysis. J. Hypertens. 2012;30:1075-1086.

    Not in our library10.1097/hjh.0b013e328352ac54

  23. 23.

    Dzhambov A.M. Long-term noise exposure and the risk for type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2015;17:23-33.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.149571

  24. 24.
    Association between transportation noise and cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies among adult populations from 1980 to 2010 · 2014
    Not checked
  25. 25.

    Huang D., Song X., Cui Q., Tian J., Wang Q., Yang K. Is there an association between aircraft noise exposure and the incidence of hypertension? A meta-analysis of 16,784 participants. Noise Health. 2015;17:93-97.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.153400

  26. 26.

    Evrard A.S., Lefèvre M., Champelovier P., Lambert J., Laumon B. Does exposure to aircraft noise increase the risk of hypertension near French airports? Proceedings of the 10th European Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (EURONOISE).

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Sørensen M., Luhdorf P., Ketzel M., Andersen Z.J., Tjønneland A., Overvad K., Raaschou-Nielsen O. Combined effects of road traffic noise and ambient air pollution in relation to risk for stroke? Environ. Res. 2014;133:49-55.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.011

  28. 28.

    Van Poll R., Ameling C., Breugelmans O., Houthuijs D., van Kempen E., Marra M., Swart W. Gezondheidsonderzoek Vliegbasis Geilenkirchen (Desk Research) I. Hoofdrapportage: Samenvatting, Conclusies en Aanbevelingen Gezondheidsonderzoek Vliegbasis Geilenkirchen. 2014.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Pershagen G., Pyko A., Eriksson C. Exposure to traffic noise and central obesity. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN).

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Oftedal B., Krog N.H., Graff-Iversen S., Haugen M., Schwarze P., Aasvang G.M. Traffic noise and markers of obesity. A population based study. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN).

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Liu C., Fuertes E., Tiesler C.M., Birk M., Babisch W., Bauer C.P., Koletzko S., von Berg A., Hoffmann B., Heinrich J., et al. The associations between traffic-related air pollution and noise with blood pressure in children: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus studies. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2014;217:499-505.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.09.008

  32. 32.

    Foraster M., Künzli N., Aguilera I., Rivera M., Agis D., Vila J., Bouso L., Delteli A., Marrugat J., Ramos R., et al. High blood pressure and long-term exposure to indoor noise and air pollution from road traffic. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122:1193-1200.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1307156

  33. 33.

    Foraster M., Basagaña X., Aguilera I., Rivera M., Agis D., Bouso L., Deltell A., Marrugat J., Ramos R., Sunyer J., et al. Association of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution with blood pressure and hypertension in an adult population-based cohort in Spain (the REGICOR study). Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122:404-411.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1306497

  34. 34.

    Eriksson C., Hilding A., Pyko A., Bluhm G., Pershagen G., Östenson C.G. Long-term aircraft noise exposure and body mass index, waist circumference, and type 2 diabetes: A prospective study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122:687-694.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1307115

  35. 35.

    Chang T.Y., Beelen R., Li S.F., Chen T.I., Lin Y.J., Bao B.Y., Liu C.S. Road traffic noise frequency and prevalent hypertension in Taichung, Taiwan: A cross-sectional study Environ. Health. 2014;13:37.

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-069x-13-37

  36. 36.

    Babisch W., Wolke G., Heinrich J., Straff W. Road traffic noise and hypertension: Accounting for the location of rooms. Environ. Res. 2014;133:380-387.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.007

  37. 37.

    Babisch W., Wolf K., Petz M., Heinrich J., Cyrys J., Peters A. Associations between traffic noise, particulat air pollution, hypertension, and isolated systolic hypertension in adults: The KORA study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122:492-498.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1306981

  38. 38.
    Long-Term Exposure to Road Traffic Noise and Incident Diabetes: A Cohort Study · 2012
    No notice
  39. 39.

    Paunović K., Belojević G., Jakovljević B. Blood pressure of urban school children in relation to road-traffic noise, traffic density and presence of public transport. Noise Health. 2013;15:253-260.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.113521

  40. 40.

    Matsui T. Psychosomatic disorder due to aircraft noise and its causal pathway. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2013 (INTER-NOISE 2013): Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013;4915-4919.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    Liu C., Fuertes E., Tiesler C.M., Birk M., Babisch W., Bauer C.P., Koletzko S., Heinrich J. The association between road traffic noise exposure and blood pressure among children in Germany: The GINIplus and LISAplus studies. Noise Health. 2013;15:165-172.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.112364

  42. 42.

    Hansell A.L., Blangiardo M., Fortunato L., Floud S., de Hoogh K., Fecht D., Ghosh R.E., Laszlo H.E., Pearson C., Beale L., et al. Aircraft noise and cardiovascular disease near Heathrow airport in London: Small area study. Br. Med. J. 2013;347:f5432.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.f5432

  43. 43.

    Foraster M., Basagaña X., Aguilera I., Rivera M., Agis D., Bouso L., Deltell A., Elosua R., Künzli N. Disentangling the effects of traffic-related noise and air pollution on blood pressure: Indoor noise levels and protections. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2013 (INTER-NOISE 2013): Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013;5047-5050.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Floud S., Blangiardo M., Clark C., de Hoogh K., Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Swart W., Pershagen G., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., et al. Exposure to aircraft and road traffic noise and associations with heart disease and stroke in six European countries: A cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2013;12:89.

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-069x-12-89

  45. 45.

    Floud S., Blangiardo M., Clark C., de Hoogh K., Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Swart W., Pershagen G., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., et al. Heart disease and stroke in relation to aircraft noise and road traffic noise—The HYENA study. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2013 (INTER-NOISE 2013): Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013;5056-5059.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Evrard A.S., Khati I., Champelovier P., Lambert J., Laumon B. Cardiovascular effects of aircraft noise near Paris-Charles de Gaulle airport: Results from the pilot study of the DEBATS research program. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (INTER-NOISE): Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Correia A.W., Peters J.L., Levy J.I., Melly S., Dominici F. Residential exposure to aircraft noise and hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases: Multi-airport retrospective study. Br. Med. J. 2013;347:f5561.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.f5561

  48. 48.

    Bilenko N., van Rossem L., Brunekreef B., Beelen R., Eeftens M., Hoek G., Houthuijs D., de Jongste J.C., van Kempen E., Koppelman G.H., et al. Traffic-related air pollution and noise and children’s blood pressure: Results from the PIAMA birth cohort study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2013;22:4-12.

    Not in our library10.1177/2047487313505821

  49. 49.

    Babisch W., Wolf K., Petz M., Heinrich J., Cyrys J., Peters A. Road traffic noise, air pollution and (isolated systolic) hypertension. Cross-sectional results from the KORA study. Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2013 (INTER-NOISE 2013): Noise Control for Quality of Life. 2013;5040-5046.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Babisch W., Pershagen G., Selander J., Houthuijs D., Breugelmans O., Cadum E., Vigna-Taglianti F., Katsouyanni K., Haralabidis A.S., Dimakopoulou K., et al. Noise annoyance—A modifier of the association between noise level and cardiovascular health? Sci. Total Environ. 2013;452–453:50-57.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.034

  51. 51.

    Sørensen M., Hoffmann B., Hvidberg M., Ketzel M., Jensen S.S., Andersen Z.J., Tjønneland A., Overvad K., Raaschou-Nielsen O. Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution associated with blood pressure and self-reported hypertension in a Danish cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012;120:418-424.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1103631

  52. 52.

    Sørensen M., Andersen Z.J., Nordsborg R.B., Tjønneland A., Raaschou-Nielsen O., Lillelund K.G., Jakobsen J., Overvad K., Burroughs C. Road traffic noise and risk for stroke and myocardial infarction. Proceedings of the 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2012 (INTER-NOISE 2012). 2012;6001-6008.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.
    Road Traffic Noise and Incident Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study · 2012
    No notice
  54. 54.

    Gan W.Q., Davies H.W., Koehoorn M., Brauer M. Association of long-term exposure to community noise and traffic-related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012;175:898-906.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwr424

  55. 55.

    Foraster M., Basagaña X., Aguilera I., Agis D., Bouso L., Phuleria H., Dratva J., Probst-Hensch N., Schindler C., Künzli N., et al. Transportation noise (in particular railway noise) and blood pressure in REGICOR compared to SAPALDIA. Proceedings of the 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2012 (INTER-NOISE 2012). 5997-6000.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Eriksson C., Nilsson M.E., Willers S.M., Gidhagen L., Bellander T., Pershagen G. Traffic noise and cardiovascular health in Sweden: The roadside study. Noise Health. 2012;14:140-147.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.99864

  57. 57.
    Transportation Noise and Blood Pressure in a Population-Based Sample of Adults · 2011
    No notice
  58. 58.

    Clark C., Crombie R., Head J., van Kamp I., van Kempen E., Stansfeld S.A. Does traffic-related air pollution explain associations of aircraft and road traffic noise exposure on children’s health and cognition? A secondary analysis of the United Kingdom sample from the RANCH project. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012;176:327-337.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kws012

  59. 59.

    Belojević G., Evans G.W. Traffic noise and blood pressure in low-socioeconomic status, African-American urban schoolchildren. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012;132:1403-1406.

    Not in our library10.1121/1.4739449

  60. 60.

    Bakker R.H., Pedersen E., van den Berg G.P., Stewart R.E., Lok W., Bouma J. Impact of wind turbine sound on annoyance, self-reported sleep disturbance and psychological distress. Sci. Total Environ. 2012;425:42-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.005

  61. 61.

    Babisch W., Swart W., Houthuijs D., Selander J., Bluhm G., Pershagen G., Dimakopoulou K., Haralabidis A.S., Katsouyanni K., Davou E., et al. Exposure modifiers of the relationships of transportation noise with high blood pressure and noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012;132:3788-3808.

    Not in our library10.1121/1.4764881

  62. 62.

    Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Swart W., Dimakopoulou K., Sourtzi P., Selander J., Bluhm G., Cadum E., Floud S., Hansell A.L. Exposure modifiers of the relationships between road traffic noise and aircraft noise with high blood pressure (HYENA study). Proceedings of the 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2012 (INTER-NOISE 2012). 6018-6027.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Sørensen M., Hvidberg M., Hoffmann B., Andersen Z.J., Nordsborg R.B., Lillelund K.G., Jakobsen J., Tjønneland A., Overvad K., Raaschou-Nielsen O. Exposure to road traffic and railway noise and associations with blood pressure and self-reported hypertension: A cohort study. Environ. Health. 2011;10:92.

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-069x-10-92

  64. 64.

    Sørensen M., Hvidberg M., Andersen Z.J., Nordsborg R.B., Lillelund K.G., Jakobsen J., Tjønneland A., Overvad K., Raaschou-Nielsen O. Road traffic noise and stroke: A prospective cohort study. Eur. Heart J. 2011;32:737-744.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehq466

  65. 65.

    Pedersen E. Health aspects associated with wind turbine noise: Results from three field studies. Noise Control Eng. J. 2011;59:47-53.

    Not in our library10.3397/1.3533898

  66. 66.

    Oftedal B., Nafstad P., Schwarze P., Aasvang G.M., Griefahn B. Road traffic noise, air pollution and blood pressure in Oslo, Norway. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN). 2011;382-385.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.
    Long-Term Urban Particulate Air Pollution, Traffic Noise, and Arterial Blood Pressure · 2011
    No notice
  68. 68.

    Foraster M., Basagaña X., Aguilera I., Rivera M., Agis D., Bouso L., Deltell A., Dratva J., Juvinya D., Sunyer J., et al. Cross-sectional association between road traffic noise and hypertension in a population-based sample in Girona, Spain (REGICOR-AIR project). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN). 2011;351-353.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    Floud S., Vigna-Taglianti F., Hansell A., Blangiardo M., Houthuijs D., Breugelmans O., Cadum E., Babisch W., Selander J., Pershagen G., et al. Medication use in relation to noise from aircraft and road traffic in six European countries: Results of the HYENA study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011;68:518-524.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2010.058586

  70. 70.

    Chang T.Y., Liu C.S., Bao B.Y., Li S.F., Chen T.I., Lin Y.J. Characterization of road traffic noise exposure and prevalence of hypertension in central Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 2011;409:1053-1057.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.039

  71. 71.

    Belojević G., Evans G.W. Traffic noise and blood pressure in North-American urban schoolchildren. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem 2011 (ICBEN 2011). 2011;336-342.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Huss A., Spoerri A., Egger M., Röösli M., for the Swiss National Cohort Study Group. Aircraft noise, air pollution, and mortality from myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2010;21:829-836.

    Not in our library10.1097/ede.0b013e3181f4e634

  73. 73.

    Eriksson C., Bluhm G., Hilding A., Őstenson C.G., Pershagen G. Aircraft noise and incidence of hypertension: Gender specific effects. Environ. Res. 2010;110:764-772.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.001

  74. 74.

    Ancona C., Forastiere F., Mataloni F., Badaloni C., Fabozzi T., Perucci C.A., on behalf of the SERA Study Team. Aircraft noise exposure and blood pressure among people living near Ciampino airport in Rome. Proceedings of the 39th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE). 2010;6601-6609.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Selander J., Nilsson M.E., Bluhm G., Rosenlund M., Lindqvist M., Nise G., Pershagen G. Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:272-279.

    Not in our library10.1097/ede.0b013e31819463bd

  76. 76.

    Pedersen E., van den Berg F., Bakker R., Bouma J. Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009;126:634-643.

    Not in our library10.1121/1.3160293

  77. 77.

    Bodin T., Albin M., Ardö J., Stroh E., Őstergren P.O., Björk E. Road traffic noise and hypertension: Results from a cross-sectional public health survey in southern Sweden. Environ. Health. 2009;8:38.

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-069x-8-38

  78. 78.

    Bluhm G., Eriksson C., Pershagen G., Hilding A., Östenson C.G. Aircraft noise and incidence of hypertension: A study around Stockholm Arlanda airport. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Noise Control 2009 (EURONOISE 2009). 2009.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Beelen R., Hoek G., Houthuijs D., van den Brandt P.A., Goldbohm R.A., Fischer P., Schouten L.J., Armstrong B., Brunekreef B. The joint association of air pollution and noise from road traffic with cardiovascular mortality in a cohort study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009;66:243-250.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2008.042358

  80. 80.

    Barregard L., Bonde E., Őhrström E. Risk of hypertension from exposure to road traffic noise in a population-based sample. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009;66:410-415.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2008.042804

  81. 81.

    Pedersen E., Larsman P. The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008;28:379-389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.009

  82. 82.

    Lercher P., de Greve B., Botteldooren D., Dekoninck L., Oettl D., Uhrner U., Rudisser J., Griefahn B. Health effects and major co-determinants associated with rail and road noise exposure along transalpine traffic corridors. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise. 2008.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.
    Hypertension and Exposure to Noise Near Airports: the HYENA Study · 2007
    No notice
  84. 84.

    Van den Berg G., Pedersen E., Bouma J., Bakker R. Project WINDFARM Perception: Visual and Acoustic Impact of Wind Turbine Farms on Residents. 2008.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Pershagen G., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., Cadum E., Jarup L. Associations between road traffic noise level, road traffic noise annoyance and high blood pressure in the HYENA study. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Noise Control 2008 (EURONOISE 2008). 3365-3370.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Pedersen E., Persson Waye K. Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007;64:480-486.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2006.031039

  87. 87.

    Lekaviciute J. Traffic Noise in Kaunas City and Its Influence on Myocardial Infarction Risk. Ph.D. Thesis. 2007.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    De Kluizenaar Y., Gansevoort R.T., Miedema H.M., de Jong P.E. Hypertension and road traffic noise exposure. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007;49:484-492.

    Not in our library10.1097/jom.0b013e318058a9ff

  89. 89.

    De Kluizenaar Y., Gansevoort R.T., de Jong P.E., Miedema H.M.E. Cardiovascular effects of road traffic noise with adjustment for air pollution. Proceedings of the 36th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, INTER-NOISE 2007. 2007;3428-3434.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    Heimann D., De Franceschi M., Emeis S., Lercher P., Seipert P. Air Pollution, Traffic Noise and Related Health Effects in the Alpine Space: A Guide for Authorities and Consulters. 2007.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Eriksson C., Rosenlund M., Pershagen G., Hilding A., Őstenson C.G., Bluhm G. Aircraft noise and incidence of hypertension. Epidemiology. 2007;18:716-721.

    Not in our library10.1097/ede.0b013e3181567e77

  92. 92.

    Bluhm G.L., Berglind N., Nordling E., Rosenlund M. Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007;64:122-126.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2005.025866

  93. 93.

    Van Kempen E., van Kamp I., Fischer P., Davies H., Houthuijs D., Stellato R., Clark C., Stansfeld S. Noise exposure and children’s blood pressure and heart rate: The RANCH-project. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006;63:632-639.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2006.026831

  94. 94.

    Van Kamp I., Houthuijs D., Van Wiechen C., Breugelmans O. Environmental noise and cardiovascular diseases: Results from a monitoring programme on aircraft noise. Proceedings of the 35th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (INTER-NOISE 2006). 2006;891-897.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Houthuijs D.J.M., van Wiechen C.M.A.G. Monitoring of Health and Perceptions around Schiphol Airport. 2006.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Björk J., Ardö J., Stroh E., Lövkvist H., Őstergren P.O., Albin M. Road traffic noise in southern Sweden and its relation to annoyance, disturbance of daily activities and health. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2006;32:392-401.

    Not in our library10.5271/sjweh.1035

  97. 97.

    Maschke C., Hecht K. Pathogenesis mechanism by noise induced clinical pictures—Lessons from the Spandau Health-Survey. Umweltmedizin in Forschung und Praxis. 2005;10:77-88.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    Jarup L., Dudley M.L., Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Swart W., Pershagen G., Bluhm G., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., Cadum E., et al. Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA): Study design and noise exposure assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005;113:1473-1478.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.8037

  99. 99.

    Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Kwekkeboom J., Swart W., Pershagen G., Bluhm G., Selander J., Katsouyanni K., Charalampidis A., Velonakis M., et al. HYENA—Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports. A European study on health effects of aircraft noise. Proceedings of the 34th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering 2005, INTERNOISE 2005. 1398-1407.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Babisch W., Beule B., Schust M., Kersten N., Ising H. Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2005;16:33-40.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ede.0000147104.84424.24

  101. 101.

    Pedersen E., Persson Waye K.P. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise: A dose-response relationship. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004;116:3460-3470.

    Not in our library10.1121/1.1815091

  102. 102.

    Matsui T., Uehara T., Miyakita T., Hiramatsu K., Osada Y., Yamamoto T. The Okinawa study: Effects of chronic aircraft noise on blood pressure and some other psychological indices. J. Sound Vib. 2004;277:469-470.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Grazuleviciene R., Lekaviciute J., Mozgeris G., Merkevicius S., Deikus J. Traffic noise emissions and myocardial infarction risk. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2004;13:737-741.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Franssen E.A.M., van Wiechen C.M.A.G., Nagelkerke N.J.D., Lebret E. Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its impact on general health and medication use. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004;61:405-413.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.2002.005488

  105. 105.

    Breugelmans O.R.P., van Wiechen C.M.A.G., van Kamp I., Heisterkamp S.H., Houthuijs D.J.M. Health and Quality of Life near Amsterdam Schiphol Airport: 2002. Interim Report. 2004.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    Bluhm G., Eriksson C., Hilding A., Östenson C.G., Czech Acoustical Society and Editor. Aircraft noise exposure and cardiovascular risk on men. First results from a study around Stockholm Arlanda airport. Proceedings of the 33th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering. 2004.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    Babisch W., Umweltbundesamt F.E.A. The NaRoMI-Study: Executive summary—Traffic noise. Chronic Noise as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction, The NaRoMI Study (Major Technical Report). 2004;I-1-I-59.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    Morrell S.L. Aircraft Noise and Child Blood Pressure. Doctoral Thesis. 2003.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    Maschke C., Wolf U., Leitmann T. Epidemiological Examinations of the Influence of Noise Stress on the Immune System and the Emergence of Arteriosclerosis. 2003.

    Not in our library

  110. 110.

    Maschke C. Epidemiological research on stress caused by traffic noise and its effects on high blood pressure and psychic disturbances. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. 2003;93-95.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Gallacher J.E. Health status as a potential effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and incidence of ischaemic heart disease. Occup. Environ. Med. 2003;60:739-745.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.60.10.739

  112. 112.

    Rosenlund M., Berglind N., Pershagen G., Jarup L., Bluhm G. Increased prevalence of hypertension in a population exposed to aircraft noise. Occup. Environ. Med. 2001;58:769-773.

    Not in our library10.1136/oem.58.12.769

  113. 113.

    Matsui T., Uehara T., Miyakita T., Hiramatsu K., Osada Y., Yamamoto T., Boone R. Association between blood pressure and aircraft noise exposure around Kadena airfield in Okinawa. Proceedings of the 2001 International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE). 2001;1577-1582.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    Morrell S., Taylor R., Carter N., Peploe P., Job S. Cross-sectional and longitudinal results of a follow-up examination of child blood pressure and aircraft noise—The inner Sydney child blood pressure study. Proceedings of the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (INTER-NOISE 2000).

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Gallacher J.E.J., Sweetnam P.M., Elwood P.C. Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk: The Caerphilly and Speedwell studies, third phase—10 years follow-up. Arch. Environ. Health. 1999;54:210-216.

    Not in our library10.1080/00039899909602261

  116. 116.

    TNO-PG, RIVM. Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Health and Perceptual Aspects in the Schiphol Region. Results of a Questionnaire. 1998.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    Yoshida T., Kawaguchi T., Hoshiyama Y., Yoshida K., Yamamoto K. Efffects of road traffic noise on inhabitants of Tokyo. J. Sound Vib. 1997;205:517-522.

    Not in our library10.1006/jsvi.1997.1020

  118. 118.

    Wiens D. Verkehrslärm und kardiovaskuläres Risiko. Eine Fall-Kontroll-Studie in Berlin (West). Dissertation. 1995.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    Regecová V., Kellerová E. Effects of urban noise pollution on blood pressure and heart rate in preschool children. J. Hypertens. 1995;13:405-412.

    Not in our library10.1097/00004872-199504000-00005

  120. 120.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Kruppa B., Wiens D. The incidence of myocardial infarction and its relation to road traffic noise—The Berlin case-control studies. Environ. Int. 1994;20:469-474.

    Not in our library10.1016/0160-4120(94)90195-3

  121. 121.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Gallacher J.E.J., Sharp D.S., Baker I. Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk: The Speedwell study, first phase. Outdoor noise level and risk factors. Arch. Environ. Health. 1993;48:401-405.

    Not in our library10.1080/00039896.1993.10545961

  122. 122.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Elwood P.C., Sharp D.S., Bainton D. Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk: The Caerphilly and Speedwell studies, second phase. Risk estimation, prevalence, and incidence of ischemic heart disease. Arch. Environ. Health. 1993;48:406-413.

    Not in our library10.1080/00039896.1993.10545962

  123. 123.

    Babisch W., Ising H., Kruppa B., Wiens D. Verkehrslärm und Herzinfarkt, Ergebnisse zweier Fall-Kontroll-Studien in Berlin. 1992.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    Pulles M.P.J., Biesiot W., Stewart R. Adverse effects of environmental noise on health: An interdisciplinary approach. Environ. Int. 1990;16:437-445.

    Not in our library10.1016/0160-4120(90)90012-u

  125. 125.

    Babisch W., Gallacher J.E.J., Berglund B., Lindvall T. Traffic noise, blood pressure and other risk factors: The Caerphilly and Speedwell Collaborative Heart Disease Studies. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. 1990;315-326.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    Herbold M., Hense H.W., Keil U. Effects of road traffic noise on prevalence of hypertension in men: Results of the Lübeck blood pressure study. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin. 1989;34:19-23.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02084747

  127. 127.

    Hense H.W., Herbold M., Honig K. Risikofaktor Lärm in Felderhebungen zu Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen. 1989.

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    Van Altena K. Environmental Noise and Health (Description of Data, Models, Methods and Results). 1989.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    Van Brederode N.E. 7. Environmental noise and cardiovascular diseases. Environmental Noise and Health (Description of Data, Models, Methods and Results). 1988.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    Babisch W., Gallacher J.E., Elwood P.C., Ising H. Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. The Caerphilly Study, first phase. Outdoor noise levels and risk factors. Arch. Environ. Health. 1988;43:407-414.

    Not in our library10.1080/00039896.1988.9935859

  131. 131.

    The Caerphilly and Speedwell Collaborative Group. Caerphilly and Speedwell collaborative heart disease studies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 1984;38:259-262.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.38.3.259

  132. 132.

    Knipschild P., Meijer H., Salle H. Wegverkeerslawaai, psychische problematiek en bloeddruk. Uitkomsten van een bevolkingsonderzoek in Amsterdam. Tijdschrift der Sociale Geneeskunde. 1984;62:758-765.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Knipschild P.V. Medical effects of aircraft noise: Community cardiovascular survey. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 1977;40:185-190.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01842081

  134. 134.

    Knipschild P.G. Medische Gevolgen van Vliegtuiglawaai. 1976.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    Lercher P., Botteldooren D., Widmann U., Uhrner U., Kammeringer E. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: Research in Austria. Noise Health. 2011;13:234-250.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.80160

  136. 136.

    Christensen J.S., Raaschou-Nielsen O., Tjønneland A., Overvad K., Nordsborg R.B., Ketzel M., Sørensen T.I.a., Sørensen M. Road traffic and railway noise exposures and adiposity in adults: A cross-sectional analysis of the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016;124:329-335.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.1409052

  137. 137.

    World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. 2012.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    European Commission, European Commission. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise. 2002;0012-0026.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    Harris R.J., Bradburn M.J., Deeks J.J., Harbord R.M., Altman D.G., Sterne J.A.C. Metan: Fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. STATA J. 2008;8:3-28.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    Cochran W.G. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101-129.

    Not in our library10.2307/3001666

  141. 141.

    Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21:1539-1558.

    Not in our library10.1002/sim.1186

  142. 142.

    Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 2003;327:557-560.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

  143. 143.

    Egger M., Smith G.D. Meta-analysis: Bias in location and selection of studies. Br. Med. J. 1998;316:61-66.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61

  144. 144.

    Harbord R.M., Egger M., Sterne J.A.C. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat. Med. 2006;25:3443-3457.

    Not in our library10.1002/sim.2380

  145. 145.

    Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 1997;315:629-634.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

  146. 146.

    Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Vist G., Kunz R., Falck-Ytter Y., Alonso-Coello P., Schünemann H.J., GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br. Med. J. 2008;336:924-926.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad

  147. 147.

    Morgan R.L., Thayer K.A., Bero L., Bruce N., Falck-Ytter Y., Ghersi D., Guyatt G., Hooijmans C., Langendam M., Mandrioli D., et al. GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ. Int. 2016;92–93:611-616.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004

  148. 148.
    Hypertension and Exposure to Noise Near Airports: the HYENA Study · 2007
    No notice
  149. 149.

    Babisch W., Wolke G., Heinrich J., Straff W. Road traffic, location of rooms and hypertension. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2014;4:162.

    Not in our library10.4172/2165-784x.1000162

  150. 150.

    Evrard A.S., Bouaoun L., Champelovier P., Lambert J., Laumon B. Does exposure to aircraft noise increase the mortality from cardiovascular disease in the population living in the vicinity of airports? Results of an ecological study in France. Noise Health. 2015;17:328-336.

    Not in our library10.4103/1463-1741.165058

  151. 151.

    Fuks K.B., Weinmayr G., Basagaña X., Gruzieva O., Hampel R., Oftedal B., Sørensen M., Wolf K., Aamodt G., Aasvang G.M., et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and traffic noise and incident hypertension in seven cohorts of the European study of cohorts for air pollution effects (ESCAPE). Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:983-990.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehw413

  152. 152.

    Héritier H., Vienneau D., Foraster M., Collins Eze I., Schaffner E., Thiesse L., Rudzik F., Habermacher M., Köpfli M., Pieren R., et al. Transportation noise exposure and cardiovascular mortality: A nationwide cohort study from Switzerland. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2017;32:307-315.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10654-017-0234-2

  153. 153.

    Seidler A., Wagner M., Schubert M., Droge P., Hegewald J. NORAH: Noise Related-Annoyance, Cognition and Health. Verkehrslarmwirkungen im Flughabenumfeld. Enbericht, Band 6: Sekundardatenbasierte Fallkontrollstudie mit vertiefender Befragung. 2015.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.
    Road traffic noise is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality in London · 2015
    No notice
  155. 155.

    Pyko A., Eriksson C., Oftedal B., Hilding A., Östenson C.G., Krog N.H., Julin B., Aasvang G.M., Pershagen G. Exposure to traffic noise and markers of obesity. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015;72:594-601.

    Not in our library10.1136/oemed-2014-102516

  156. 156.

    Oftedal B., Krog N.H., Pyko A., Eriksson C., Graff-Iversen S., Haugen M., Schwarze P., Pershagen G., Aasvang G.M. Road traffic noise and markers of obesity—A population-based study. Environ. Res. 2015;20:144-153.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.011

  157. 157.

    Christensen J.S., Raaschou-Nielsen O., Tjønneland A., Nordsborg R.B., Jensen S.S., Sørensen T.I., Sørensen M. Long-term exposure to residential traffic noise and changes in body weight and waist circumference: A cohort study. Environ. Res. 2015;143:154-161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.007

  158. 158.

    Christensen J.S., Hjorteberg D., Raaschou-Nielsen O., Ketzel M., Sørensen T.I., Sørensen M. Pregnancy and childhood exposure to residential traffic noise and overweight at 7 years of age. Environ. Int. 2016;94:170-176.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.016

  159. 159.

    Morrell S., Taylor R., Carter N., Job S., Peploe P., Carter N., Job R.F.S. Cross-sectional relationship between blood pressure of school children and aircraft noise. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Noise Effects ’98. 1998;275-279.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.