Unintended Consequences of not Specifying Exclusionary Illnesses for Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease

The Institute of Medicine recently proposed a new case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), as well as a new name, Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID). Contrary to the Fukuda et al.’s CFS case definition, there are few exclusionary illnesses specified for this new SEID case definition. The current study explored this decision regarding exclusionary illnesses using the SEID criteria with four distinct data sets involving patients who had been identified as having CFS, as well as healthy controls, community controls, and other illness groups. The findings indicate that many individuals from major depressive disorder illness groups as well as other medical illnesses were categorized as having SEID. The past CFS Fukuda et al. prevalence rate in a community based sample of 0.42 increased by 2.8 times with the new SEID criteria. The consequences for this broadening of the case definition are discussed.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 3.

   Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – A clinically empirical approach to its definition and study · 2005

2. 19.

   Psychometric properties of the CDC Symptom Inventory for assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome · 2005

3. 23.

   Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria · 2011

23 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

• Review of case definitions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) · 2020

• Onset Patterns and Course of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome · 2019

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.