Tumor-Associated Neutrophils in Cancer: Going Pro

1Cancer-related fatalities rank as the second leading cause of death in all ages and both genders in the United States. Generally, the treatments for early-stage cancers are effective, contrary to late-stage when the malignancies spread to remote organs. Currently, the primary treatments for cancer include chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. The working mechanisms of chemotherapy drugs usually involve inhibiting DNA synthesis as well as cell replication, cell mitotic, or inhibiting topoisomerases. However, cancer cells can easily develop therapy resistance through mechanisms including a decrease in drug intake, increase in drug efflux, or epithelia to the mesenchymal transition (EMT), and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Through these mechanisms, tumor cells relapse and metastasize to distant organs even after treatment. Consequently, there is an urgent need for an effective therapeutic plan for cancer patients.

2Previous studies demonstrate that the tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in cancer metastasis. The tumor microenvironment significantly affects the therapeutic response and the overall outcome of the patients. Additionally, neutrophils as a critical factor in the tumor microenvironment play an essential regulatory role in cancer progression.

3Neutrophils, which originate from the myeloid precursor, compose the significant cellular parts of white blood cells and are the primary responsive cell type for an innate immune response. Neutrophils, the hallmark of acute inflammation, are polymorpho-nuclear cells, which derives its name ‘neutrophil’ from the positive staining of both hematoxylin and eosin dyes. Based on traditional immunology, neutrophils are mainly responsible for host defense, immune modulation, and tissue injury. Their functions in tumor progression were neglected due to these traditional ideas as well as their short survival time (around 3 to 24 h). However, recent results proved the phenotype heterogeneity and functional versatility of the neutrophils. Researchers found that neutrophils play a pivotal role in chronic inflammatory diseases including cancer. They function in a more complex way when compared to traditional ideas about neutrophils. Specifically, neutrophils can survive longer than researchers’ initial belief (5 or more days in circulation), especially in the tumor microenvironment. There are some pro-inflammatory factors in the tumor microenvironment reported to extend neutrophil survival time such as the interferon gamma (INFγ), and activate tumor-associated neutrophils in different conditions, which results in anti-tumor and pro-tumor functions of neutrophils. Currently, there is increasing evidence indicating that neutrophils are playing vital functions in the tumor microenvironment. However, the nature of these roles in different cancer types is still debatable. Meanwhile, the population of neutrophils renders phenotypic heterogeneity and functional versatility. However, how to clarify the polarization states of the tumor-associated neutrophils is still under investigation. Additionally, the detailed mechanism regarding neutrophil-facilitated cancer progression remains unclear.

4Under cancer and severe injury conditions, neutrophils are often associated with a granulocytic population of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (gMDSCs). gMDSCs share similar morphology and expression of cell surface markers with mature neutrophils, but the difference lies in the suppression capacity of T-lymphocytes. This review summarizes the neutrophil recruitment, functions, and regulator of neutrophil functions in the tumor microenvironment. We will also discuss the clinical potential of using neutrophils as a prognostic marker, therapeutic target, and potential biomarker in cancer patients.

5The mobilization of neutrophils from bone marrow to tumor sites occurs in three phases including expansion and maturation of pre-mature neutrophils in the bone marrow, intravasation to circulation through attachment to endothelial cells, and the chemotactic movement of neutrophils to tumor sites. The pre-mature neutrophils are derived from hematopoietic stem cells. The proliferation and maturation of neutrophils require the regulation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The neutrophil maturation also includes the nuclear morphology change—the original round-shape nucleus finalizes to a segmented shaped nucleus and surface antigen expression changes including CD 65 and CD16.

6The release of neutrophils in bone marrow mainly depends on the interplay between CXCR4 and CXCR2 and its ligands. These two receptors belong to the CXC chemokine receptor family as G-protein coupled receptors. CXCR4 and CXCR2 are expressed on the surface of the neutrophil and span seven times the neutrophil membrane. The role of CXCR4 is for neutrophil homing in the bone marrow. Higher levels of CXCR4 and its ligands (for instance, CXCL12) will restrain the neutrophils mobility. An initial step for neutrophil movement is the disruption of CXCR4 and its ligand expression by factors including G-CSF.

7Conversely, the CXCR2 receptor is mainly responsible for the release of neutrophils into circulation, CXCR2, CXCR2 ligands, and G-CSF co-ordinates together to facilitate neutrophil mobilization. Antagonistic interactions between CXCR2 and CXCR4 maintains the homeostasis of neutrophils. The increased expression of CXCR2 indicates the mobilization of mature neutrophils to the circulation system. Meanwhile, the upregulation of CXCR4 on aged neutrophils will result in them backing to the bone marrow and being digested by macrophages.

8The mobilization of neutrophils to the tumor sites also requires an interplay between CXCR2 and its ligands CXCL1-3 and CXCL5-8. In cancer, the CXCR2 axis is the primary player for neutrophil recruitment to the tumor sites. Multiple cell types within the tumor produce the CXCR2 chemokines including tumor cells, immune cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Once the neutrophil mobilization is needed, these contributors will release the CXCR2 chemokines into the circulation system. The neutrophils will then move through a positive chemotactic gradient, towards the higher concentration of the CXCR2 ligands. The expression of CXCR2 on neutrophil cell surfaces and the production of CXCR2 ligands are both vital for this chemotactic movement. The inhibition of CXCR2 expression in neutrophils will result in neutrophil retention in bone marrow. Additionally, the inhibition of CXCR2 ligands also ends in significantly reduced neutrophil mobilization.

9Based on previous reports, there are several positive regulators, which lead to an increase in neutrophil recruitment such as G-CSF and interleukin 17 (IL17). G-CSF is a cytokine produced by multiple cells types, including macrophage, endothelial cells, and cancer cells. Apart from neutrophil mobilization, G-CSF is also known to play a role in neutrophil proliferation, maturation, and function. G-CSF positively regulate neutrophil migration by downregulating the expression of CXCR4 and its ligand, CXCL12. Blocking the G-CSF receptor in mice ends up with impaired neutrophil mobilization. However, experiments showed that G-CSF did not induce the chemotactic effects on murine neutrophils, which indicates G-CSF induced neutrophil migration mainly depend on the indirect activity of G-CSF. The recruitment of neutrophils seems to be more dependent on CXCR4, CXCR2, and their ligands.

10Another critical factor for neutrophil recruitment is IL17. The IL17 family consists of six members, IL17A-F. Since IL17A is the most notable members in the family, it is also known as IL17. IL17 was found to upregulate the expression levels of various cytokines and chemokines, including G-CSF, IL6, CCL2 (MCP-1), and CXCR2 ligands. IL17 is positively linked with neutrophil numbers in the tumor microenvironment. In breast cancer models, IL17 is found to increase the secretion of CXCL1 and CXCL5 by mammary carcinoma cells, which further facilitates cancer progression. Consequently, higher levels of IL17 presenting in breast cancer patients correlate with lower survival rates of the patient.

11Neutrophils respond differently to different stimuli. Various stimuli in the tumor microenvironment result in the activation of neutrophils to different phenotypes as anti-tumor and pro-tumor. Similarly, with the classification of tumor-associated macrophage in the tumor microenvironment (M1 for anti-tumor microphage, M2 for pro-tumor macrophage), the neutrophils are classified into two polarization states, which are N1 (anti-tumor neutrophil) and N2 (pro-tumor neutrophil). This N1 and N2 concept were first proposed by Fridlender Z.G. et al. in 2009. According to previous studies, after exposure to regulatory factors such as G-CSF or transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), neutrophils transform to the N2 phenotype. N2 neutrophils are characterized as a higher expression of pro-tumor factors to induce the immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, including CCL2, CCL5, neutrophil elastase (NE), and cathepsin G (CG), with a higher expression of arginase. Blockade of TGF-β signaling or type I IFNs treatment results in neutrophils with a hyper-segmented nucleus, and they are more cytotoxic (N1) to the tumor cells. N1 neutrophils have elevated expressions of immuno-activating chemokines and cytokines including TNF (tumor necrosis factor) α, ICAM-1, and FAS. The functions of neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment seem distinct. However, as of now, unlike M1 and M2, there is no suitable marker to indicate the N1 and N2 neutrophils in the tumor.

12Tumor-associated neutrophils are generally considered a pro-tumor factor in multiple tumor types, including breast cancer. Using over 5000 cases of 25 different cancer types, Gentles et al. indicated that higher polymorpho-nuclear cell (PMN, including neutrophils) infiltration would lead to the lowest overall survival for those cancer patients compared to other leukocytes. Additionally, the higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) indicates a worse prognosis for those patients. There are also studies regarding neutrophils establishing a pre-metastatic niche for the malignant tumor cells. These studies indicate the overall pro-tumor functions of neutrophils in multiple cancer types. We have discussed the clinical relevance of NLR in Section 5.1.

13Based on the published reports, the neutrophils play pro-tumor roles through multiple mechanisms introduced below.

14As mentioned before, neutrophils are the most abundant leukocytes and are recruited to the infected site during an immune response. Once the pathogen invades the host tissue and starts to replicate, the resident macrophage will respond to the pathogen with phagocytosis and secrete factors including CXCR2 ligands, which promote mobilization of activated neutrophils from bone marrow to the infected tissue. The multiple receptors on the neutrophil surface, such as CD14, enable neutrophils to recognize and eliminate the pathogens. One of the killing mechanisms of neutrophils to the pathogens includes phagocytosis. Neutrophils consist of a significant part of the phagocyte system. The phagocytes can sense and engulf the pathogens by forming phagosome and later fusing with a lysosome. The enzymes in the neutrophils’ granules, for instance, NADPH oxidase, enable the changes of pH in phagolysosome and release the reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the respiratory burst. The production of ROS in phagolysosome is for killing the pathogens. However, the released ROS by neutrophils can result in DNA base damages, as well as mutations, which are essential for cancer initiation, cell proliferation, cancer-favored inflammation, immune suppression, and EMT in multiple cancer types, including breast cancer.

15Tumor cells are usually subjected to high ROS levels in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, ROS usually play a pro-tumor role during progression. For instance, in breast cancer, multinucleated cells produce ROS to stabilize HIF-1α, which promote increased production of VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor) and MIF (Macrophage migration inhibition factor), which facilitate cancer progression and chemotherapy resistance. The neutrophil released ROS can also result in epithelial damage and cancer favored inflammation. ROS such as hydrogen peroxide can also function as messengers in cell signaling, which can also regulate cell signaling pathways such as the MAPK/Erk1/2pathway, the PI 3K/Akt pathway, and the IKK/NF-κB pathway in cancer. CD8+ T cells after exposure to MDSCs produced ROS results in antigen-specific tolerance. However, hydrogen peroxide production by neutrophil is also considered one of the neutrophil killing mechanisms to the tumor cells, so the progression of cancer requires the delicate homeostasis of ROS levels in the tumor microenvironment. The release of ROS by neutrophil can be considered a potential therapeutic target for cancer patients.

16Other than ROS, neutrophils also release various cytokines and chemokines into the tumor microenvironment. The production of these cytokines and chemokines differ according to different stimuli. In the tumor microenvironment, neutrophils tend to secrete pro-tumor factors like TGF-β to educate themselves and other cell types to a pro-cancer phenotype. However, in other cases like host defense, the neutrophils may behave differently compared to the tumor microenvironment. They react quickly in acute inflammation, and one of their significant roles in acute inflammation is phagocytosis.

17Table 1 and Table 2 summarizes the cytokines and chemokines produced by neutrophils and their roles in the tumor microenvironment. Based on these studies, the dominant role of neutrophil secreted factors is pro-tumor. For example, in breast cancer, when co-cultured with human breast cancer cell lines, the neutrophils released oncostatin M, (OSM, a member of interleukin-6 (IL-6) superfamily) which promoted tumor progression by facilitating angiogenesis and metastasis through the induction of VEGF expression and increases on cancer cell invasive potential.

18Additionally, researchers found that breast cancer metastasis required the secretion of TGF-β. Tumor-associated myeloid cells expressed TGF-β, and specific deletion of Tgfbr2 in tumor-associated myeloid cells inhibited cancer metastasis, which indicates that the myeloid-specific TGF-β signaling is a vital part of cancer metastasis. Tumor-associated neutrophils can also release other pro-inflammatory cytokines into the tumor such as IL17. As described before, IL17 can upregulate CXCR2 ligand expression to facilitate neutrophils mobilization, which indicates a feedforward loop in this gastric cancer model. In addition, IL17 itself can play a pro-tumor role through mechanisms such as induction of the cancer stem cell feature in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia cells. Additionally, neutrophils release multiple chemokines into the tumor microenvironment, including CXC and CC chemokines. The mobility of the neutrophil to the tumor site requires interactions between CXC chemokines in circulation and CXC receptors on the neutrophil membrane. Higher levels of CXCR2 ligands including CXCL8 may result in higher numbers of recruited neutrophils on the tumor sites. Therefore, the release of CXCL8 in head and neck cancer by neutrophils may suggest a feedforward loop for neutrophil recruitment. In addition, in multiple cancer cases, it has been reported that neutrophils secreted a significant amount of CC ligands, and the higher levels of CC ligands correlate with lower survival rates for cancer patients. The CC ligands are known chemoattractants for immune cells such as monocyte and regulatory T cells.

19Apart from neutrophils, cells such as tumor cells, Th17 cells, γβ T cells, B cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages present in the tumor microenvironment secrete regulatory factors to facilitate cancer progression. As discussed previously, the proliferation and maturation of neutrophils in bone marrow requires cytokines and chemokines such as G-CSF, CXCR2 chemokines, and IL17. Multiple cell types in the tumor microenvironment contribute to the pool of G-CSF, CXCR2 ligands, and IL17. In the tumor microenvironment, the primary source of G-CSF includes cancer cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and lymphocytes while the major contributors of IL17 include Th17 cells and γβ T cells.

20Factors secreted by neutrophils can educate other immune cells to a pro-tumor type. For instance, OSM is found to regulate macrophage polarization to a pro-tumor phenotype (M2 type) in the tumor microenvironment, and this regulation is via mTOR signaling complex 2 (mTORC2). Neutrophils also release TGF-β into the tumor microenvironment, which promotes the macrophages’ differentiation into M2 type macrophages. Other than interactions with macrophages, neutrophils can interact with T cells in the tumor microenvironment, which can promote cancer metastasis. For example, in a breast cancer mouse model, IL17 producing T cells upregulate the levels of G-CSF, which results in the expansion of neutrophils and alters the neutrophil phenotype. The altered neutrophils then produce nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) to suppress the CD8 T cells’ anti-tumor functions in the tumor microenvironment, which results in higher metastasis of cancer cells.

21Four types of granules are present in neutrophils, the primary (azurophil), secondary, and tertiary granules, as well as secretory vesicles. These granules consist of various proteases. By far, the most well studied proteases in cancer include CG, NE, and matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9). They are all derived from neutrophil granules. Various reports indicate that they play a pro-metastasis role through mechanisms including EMT, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. For instance, NE and CG were found to degrade thrombospondin 1 in the pre-metastatic tumor microenvironment to promote cancer progression.

22CG is a serine protease that resides in neutrophil primary granules. CG is pre-synthesized in promyelocytes in bone marrow and then stored in neutrophil primary granules as active proteases. The high isoelectric points for CG (12) cause them to be easily caught in negatively charged traps such as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). In breast cancer, CG facilitated the E-cadherin-dependent aggregation of mammary carcinoma cells, MCF-7, and it was through insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling. Inhibition of CG resulted in less osteolysis in breast cancer, which indicated CG as a potential therapeutic target.

23NE is also known as a serine protease. Neutrophils mostly contributed NE. Similar to CG, NE is pre-synthesized in promyelocytes and stored in neutrophil granules in an active form. The high isoelectric points for NE (larger than 9) also cause them to be easily trapped in negative charged NET. NE is found to initiate and upregulate the cancer-related signaling such as EGFR/MEK/ERK signaling, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. Interactions between NE and signaling results in higher levels of pro-cancer factors such as TGF-β.

24NE significantly promotes cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Cancer cells can uptake NE through neuropilin-1 if they lack endogenous NE expression. Various studies showed inhibition of NE results in the suppression of tumor progression in multiple cancer types, including breast and prostate cancer. Breast cancer patients with higher levels of NE correlated with lower survival rates, which indicates NE as an independent prognostic marker. Additionally, the increased expression level of NE is suggested to be a therapeutic target for colorectal cancer.

25NE and CG both promote lung metastasis by degrading anti-cancer protein Thrombospondin 1 (Tsp1). Both CG and NE are also involved in ECM remodeling in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, ECM remodeling is very crucial for cancer metastasis. Other than NE and CG, neutrophil released matrix metalloproteases (MMP) such as MMP-8 and MMP-9 are also found to be involved in ECM remodeling to facilitate cancer progression.

26MMP is defined as a cluster of enzymes whose catalytic abilities require the involvement of zinc. MMP-9 is stored in neutrophil tertiary granules. The release of MMP-9 is delicately regulated by various cytokines and growth factors, including the TNF, TGF-β, and the VEGF. After release from the neutrophil granules, MMP-9 plays a pro-tumor role through mechanisms such as remodeling of ECM by degradation of extracellular proteins (such as type IV collagen), membrane cleavage, or activating pro-tumor factors including TGF-β.

27Compared with normal tissues, breast cancer tissues have higher expression levels of MMP-9, which suggests it is associated with breast cancer development and tumor progression. In basal-like triple negative breast cancer, MMP-9 significantly promotes breast cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. Silencing MMP-9 expression results in suppression of malignancy. Higher MMP-9 levels also indicate the more severe malignancies and shorter survival time. Studies indicate that higher levels of MMP-9 correlate with higher metastasis in breast cancer patients. Positive stromal MMP-9 expression also predicts poor survival in hormone-responsive small mammary tumors. All these results indicate MMP-9 as a potential biomarker for breast cancer patients.

28Historically, it was thought that neutrophil killing mechanisms included phagocytosis and secretion of killing factors such as MMPs, CG, and NE. However, in 2004, Brinkmann et al. discovered NET as another killing mechanism. This mechanism is named NETosis. NETosis is a unique form of cell death that is characterized by the release of de-condensed chromatin and granular contents to the extracellular space. NETosis usually requires stimulation to neutrophils and the generation of ROS by NADPH oxidase. Initial studies report the neutrophils after being activated by stimuli such as CXCL8 or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) will produce the fragile and fiber-like net by ejecting nuclear chromatin attached with proteases (such as NE, CG, MMP-9, myeloperoxidase) to entangle and eliminate the pathogens. This process requires the rupture of the cytoplasmic membrane. However, there are also reports regarding neutrophils forming NET through the release of mitochondria DNA. This process does not require the lytic death of neutrophils. Additionally, NET plays a regulatory role in multiple diseases by activating dendritic and T cells.

29Neutrophils are also activated and form NET in the tumor microenvironment. Based on previous studies, NET plays a pro-tumor role during tumor progression. There is evidence that indicates the NET directly functions on tumors cells, which enhances their proliferation through proteases such as NE on the NET, or through activating signaling pathways such as the NF-κB. Additionally, in a lung cancer model, NET trapped the circulating lung carcinoma cells and promoted tumor cell metastasis. Further studies demonstrate the capture of cancer cells by neutrophils is through β1-integrin expressions on both cancer cells and NETs.

30When compared to healthy controls, the levels of NET increased in cancer patients’ plasma (lung cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and bladder cancer). Furthermore, in Ewing sarcoma, patients with higher levels of NET have metastasis and early relapse after intensive chemotherapy treatment. Similarly, according to these findings, the levels of NETs in colorectal cancer patients are also significantly higher than healthy controls. Adverse patient outcomes are associated with increased preoperative NETs production. These results indicate that NETs could be considered a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target.

31In breast cancer, LPS-activated neutrophils awaken the dormant breast cancer cells by producing NET. The produced NET remodels laminin through the MMP-9 and NE proteases on the NET. The remodeled laminin further activates integrin α3β1 signaling to awaken the breast cancer cells. Inhibiting the formation of NET by DNase I digestion or by inhibition of protein arginine deiminase 4 prevents the activation of dormant cancer cells. Additionally, metastatic breast cancer cells are also able to activate neutrophils and promote the formation of NET in the absence of infection. The activation of neutrophils by cancer cells is through the secretion of G-CSF. Blocking the formation of NET by DNase I showed the prevention of lung metastasis in mice.

32Chemotherapy as the first line defense is most commonly used for cancer patients. However, one of the major challenges regarding cancer treatments includes therapeutic resistance. Currently, researchers found the tumor microenvironment is closely linked with therapy resistance. The changes in the tumor microenvironment include polarization of immune cells to a pro-tumor type as well as secretion of cytokines and proteases that promotes angiogenesis and metastasis.

33Neutrophils are a significant component in the tumor microenvironment and are found to play a pivotal role in chemotherapy resistance. The potential prognostic marker NLR is a useful marker for resistance to chemotherapy. The higher NLR indicates higher resistance when patients receive chemotherapy drugs, which indicates the lower survival rates for cancer patients. Targeting neutrophils in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma enhances the therapeutic response to chemotherapy drugs. Neutrophils can release pro-angiogenic factors such as MMP-9, MMP-8, and CXCL8 to promote resistance to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma patients. Sunitinib is a common chemotherapy drug for multiple cancer types. Additionally, higher levels of NE in distant metastatic breast cancer patients is associated with a poor response to tamoxifen. Neutrophil released TGF-β can also be involved in the EMT process, which promotes tumor cells establishing resistance to gemcitabine. Other than facilitating cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy drugs, neutrophils also facilitate tumor cell resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapy. For instance, IL17 promotes resistance to VEGF inhibition therapy by positively recruiting neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment.

34The majority of cancer studies report that neutrophils are playing a pro-tumor progression role (Figure 1). Nevertheless, some published data also indicates that neutrophils play an anti-tumor role in certain cases. For instance, neutrophils after physical contact with cancer cells can secret H2O2, which results in tumor cell death via Ca2+ influx through the TRPM2 Ca2+ channel. Furthermore, through physical contact, neutrophils isolated from healthy donors specifically possess a tumor suppression ability mediated through Fas ligand /Fas interaction. The Met and its ligand, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), also caused the release of nitric oxide to eliminate the tumor cells in anti-tumor neutrophils. Preclinical studies to educate pro-tumor neutrophils to an anti-tumor type suggest their utility. The combination of poly I:C and inactivated Sendai virus particles (hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope; HVJ-E) increased the FAS+ neutrophil infiltration in the tumor. Concurrently, FAS+ neutrophils enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity towards B16-F10 melanoma cells.

35The majority of neutrophil-released proteases play a pro-tumor role such as NE and CG. Furthermore, neutrophils also release MMP-8 (Collagenase-2) in cancer cases. MMP-8 modulates neutrophil mobilization by generating chemotactic Pro-Gly-Pro (PGP) tripeptide. However, the role of MMP-8 in tumor progression is controversial. Some reports indicate the anti-tumor role of MMP-8. For instance, in syngeneic melanoma and the lung carcinoma mouse models, MMP-8 prevented metastasis formation by regulating tumor cell adhesion and invasion. Cells with MMP-8 overexpression enhanced adhesion to type I collagen and laminin-1, and knock-off of MMP-8 in mice resulted in increased metastasis.

36In breast cancer patients, expression of MMP-8 correlates with lower lymph node metastasis, which indicates MMP-8 as a potential prognostic marker for breast cancer patients. Although the expression of MMP-8 is detrimental to breast cancer cells, MMP-8 upregulates pro-tumor cytokines, IL-6 and IL-8, in a self-reinforcing loop manner. In colorectal cancer patients’ serum, higher levels of MMP-8 indicate an adverse outcome for the patient.

37Based on recent findings, neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment usually play a pro-tumor role through the formation of NET, the release of ROS, the secretion of pro-tumor cytokines and chemokines, and the promotion of immunosuppression. Neutrophils emerged as the least favorable cell populations regarding cancer patients’ survival, which indicates significance for patients’ prognosis.

38Higher infiltration of neutrophils or NLR in cancer patients correlates with poor clinical outcomes in multiple cancers. All these findings indicate that neutrophils could be considered a potential prognostic marker for cancer patients. When a significantly high number of infiltrated neutrophils are present in tumors compared to normal tissues, neutrophils may serve as a diagnostic indicator. Other than the neutrophil itself, the neutrophil releasing factors NE and OSM could also be considered a prognostic and diagnostic marker for multiple cancer types, including breast cancer. The detection of neutrophil frequency or NLR, or neutrophil-releasing factors in patients’ serum is easy, inexpensive, and applicable. However, to make the prognostic or diagnostic results more accurate, the results may still require optimization by a combination of other cancer-related factors.

39As the most abundant leukocyte in the human circulation system, the role of neutrophils in tumor progression is pivotal. Additionally, neutrophils always play a pro-tumor role in the tumor microenvironment. Depletion of neutrophils prevented cancer progression in various mouse models. Targeting neutrophils or neutrophil-releasing factors could be regarded as a promising therapeutic plan for cancer patients.

40Based on previous research, there are mainly four ways to target neutrophils: prevention of neutrophil expansion in the bone marrow, inhibition of neutrophil recruitment to the tumor or circulation system, education of pro-tumor neutrophils to an anti-tumor phenotype, and targeting neutrophil-releasing pro-tumor factors (for instance, neutrophil released cytokines and proteases).

41Clinically, one of the most applicable ways of targeting neutrophils is through the inhibition of CXCR2, which is the positive regulator of neutrophil mobilization. For instance, a CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069, effectively reduced absolute neutrophil counts in bronchiectasis patients. The AZD5069 anti-cancer effect and whether it could be included as a therapeutic plan for cancer patients is still under investigation. Additionally, there are studies regarding targeting neutrophils-releasing NE in cancer patients. The application of the NE inhibitor to cancer patients mostly focuses on alleviating the side effects of the therapeutic cancer plan. For example, after receiving the NE inhibitor, sivelestat sodium hydrate, patients with thoracic esophagus carcinoma showed an improved systemic inflammatory response. Elimination of NET by DNase I digestion is also an applicable and easy method. However, although several clinical trials are ongoing, no result has come out regarding targeting NET in cancer patients. Additional preclinical and clinical studies are needed to better understand the therapeutic effects of targeting neutrophils in cancer patients.

42Currently, more attention is being directed toward tumor-associated neutrophils and their functions in the tumor microenvironment. In recent years, researchers have generated data regarding neutrophil’s extended survival time, NETosis, and N1 and N2 polarization states. However, more data is still needed to delineate the neutrophil facilitated tumor progression, and it may take time to translate these research results to clinical use for cancer patients. Nevertheless, studies on neutrophils shed light on understanding the tumor microenvironment, which promotes more research in order to find a cure for cancer patients.