Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Electrically Conductive Materials: Opportunities and Challenges in Tissue Engineering

Azadeh Saberi, Farzaneh Jabbari, Payam Zarrintaj and 2 more

Biomolecules · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/biom9090448

Abstract

Tissue engineering endeavors to regenerate tissues and organs through appropriate cellular and molecular interactions at biological interfaces. To this aim, bio-mimicking scaffolds have been designed and practiced to regenerate and repair dysfunctional tissues by modifying cellular activity. Cellular activity and intracellular signaling are performances given to a tissue as a result of the function of elaborated electrically conductive materials. In some cases, conductive materials have exhibited antibacterial properties; moreover, such materials can be utilized for on-demand drug release. Various types of materials ranging from polymers to ceramics and metals have been utilized as parts of conductive tissue engineering scaffolds, having conductivity assortments from a range of semi-conductive to conductive. The cellular and molecular activity can also be affected by the microstructure; therefore, the fabrication methods should be evaluated along with an appropriate selection of conductive materials. This review aims to address the research progress toward the use of electrically conductive materials for the modulation of cellular response at the material-tissue interface for tissue engineering applications.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

According to statistics, only in the US, one person is listed as waiting for an organ transplant every fifteen minutes. Unfortunately, less than half of the waiting patients are lucky enough to receive an appropriate organ from a pardoner due to exponential growth in the list of expectants. This raising dearth, however, is unable to be met by an accumulation of transplantable organs that has stagnated over the previous decade. One of the most undertaken strategies is tissue engineering, which reduces the organ shortage catastrophe thanks to artificial tissue design by the use of a combination of cells, engineering principles, and materials. Tissue engineering techniques have been frequently applied to many types of tissues and organs such as skin, heart, muscle, nerve, bone, cartilage, and cornea. In the body, tissue cells are besieged by a sophisticated mechanical, chemical, and electrical milieu. Commonly-used in vitro culture techniques have limited choices for mimicking all micro-environmental factors to direct stem cell differentiation in a developing organ. Tissue properties such as stiffness and biosignals determine the cellular activity, including adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and growth, that the architected scaffold should display to mimic the native tissue properties for damaged tissue to guarantee required regeneration. For instance, the stiffness of a scaffold is responsible for the formation of a brindled structure for skeletal myoblasts, stimulation of capillary tubes for endothelial cells, and neurite outgrowth for neuron cells. Since cellular fate is modulated by cell-scaffold interactions, efforts have been done to regulate cellular responses by controlling the topography, 3D geometry, or chemical composition of cell substrates. Additionally, some external factors can potentially affect cell–material interactions and biocompatibility including: Physical stimulation using surface topology; biochemical stimulations using release of growth factors; and mechanical and electrical stimulation (ES). The impact of electrical inducement on tissues has been defined since the 1960s when Bassett et al. proved that the electrical stimulation affects the bone formation. It has been proved and explained how tissue microenvironment experiences a field of 1 V/cm during wound healing. It has also been demonstrated that in vitro application of electrophysiologically DC fields (1–10 V/cm) and AC currents (10 to 100 mA) governs cellular behavior via interference in migration, cytoskeleton organization, alignment of neural cells, vascular endothelial, cardiofibroblasts, and myoblast cells, and enhances neurite outgrowth in nerve cells, differentiation, collagen production, and enhances calcification of osteoblasts. Altogether, these preliminary studies have confirmed that the electrical and mechanical properties of scaffolds should be properly controlled for the development of physiologically healthy artificial tissues. While there are several studies on conducting polymers for microelectronic and optoelectronic applications, researchers are exerting their focus toward biomedical applications; especially, biosensing, drug delivery, bioactuators, bioimaging and tissue engineering that benefit from developments in electroactive biomaterials. The common attributes of conducting polymers (CPs) such as polyaniline (PANi), poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), and polypyrrole (PPy) are demanded for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications such as electroactivity, reversible oxidation, hydrophobicity, biocompatibility and surface topography. Nevertheless, elongated in vivo degradation time of conducting polymers may result in inflammation and requirement of surgical removal. To overcome such problems, researchers are now working on the development of biodegradable CPs.

2. Conductive Materials in Tissue Engineering

It is known that biomaterials surface properties have an important impact on cellular activities and cell–substrate interactions. The ability to keeping cells on the surface rather than within the hydrophobic scaffolds is one of the challenging issues in scaffold design. In this sense, surface treatment strategies have been developed to prepare substrates with high cell attachment potential. Along with the surface treatment, tissue engineering strategies can lead cells fate into particular, favorable lineages. Although electrical stimulation currents can be propagated via ionically conductive culture media, a more intended successful delivery requires electrical conductivity within three dimensional scaffolds for better tissue repair. Electrical stimulation was revealed to have affirmative influences on the function and behavior of electroactive tissues. Electroactive materials along with preparation of the proper substrate for cell adhesion and growth can make possible stimulation of cellular activity using electrical transfer. In order to prepare proper environmental stimulus to develop healthy cell function and tissue regeneration, there is a need to develop scaffolds with all requirements, i.e., electrical, mechanical and chemical properties. The conductivity of tissues (ventricular muscle, nerve, lung, cardiac, and skeletal muscle) lies in an ordered manner in between 0.03 and 0.6 S/m.

Conductive biomaterials are a member of a novel generation of “smart” biomaterials that let direct transference of electrical, electrochemical and electromechanical stimuli to cells. Electrically conductive organic polymers are a new type of ‘synthetic metals’ that merge the chemical and mechanical properties of polymers with the electronic confidants of metals and semiconductors, together. These π-conjugated polymers have unconstrained electrons in their segments. Within the unsaturated segments, by free motion of the loosely held π-electrons an electrical path can be opened for itinerant charge carriers. The CPs possessing useful electrical and optical properties effectively control the electrical motive, as well as have a high conductivity/weight ratio and can be manufactured with some key characteristics such as being biocompatible, biodegradable and porous. Moreover, the changes of surface zeta potential and polymer surface properties like wettability and spatial conformation can influence the cell’s behavior during ES. Alternatively, cellular functions, such as cell growth, migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, can be corrected by conductive polymers with/without ES. A great advantage of CPs is the ability to adapting their properties to the specific requirements of their usage by accommodating antibodies, enzymes and other biological segments. As illustrated in Figure 1, conductive materials, due to versatility, can be designed for targeted tissue to enhance the regeneration. Substrate conductivity, which can be adjusted using synthesis method, can affect drug release pattern, physical properties, cell behavior and regeneration rate. Tissue properties can be encoded on the conductive substrate on which the designed platform recapitulates the tissue properties to achieve maximum regeneration.

Langer and Ingber are the pioneers who verified the cell function interaction with CP by seeding mammalian cells on the conductive films based on PPy, affected by its redox state. Later, Williams and Doherty exerted the PPy as a scaffold in nerve tissue engineering. Their results offered that this biocompatible conductive substrate could be used as a nerve conduit and as a substrate for electrical currents delivery simultaneously. Furthermore, Thrikvikraman et al. showed the external electric stimulation of the stem cell can determine its fate to specific lineage. As illustrated in Figure 2, electrical stimulation and its response pattern have significant effect on cell morphology, proliferation and behavior. In this review article, conductive materials used to conduct the scaffolds for various tissue engineering applications have also been considered. Table 1 presents a brief view over conductive materials used in tissue scaffolds.

2.1. Polypyrrole

Polypyrrole (PPy) is the most common choice among other conductive polymers due to high electrical conductivity, pliable procedure of preparation, various surface modification, great environmental resistance, proper biocompatibility, ion exchange capacity, and support cellular activities. PPy should be doped with various anions such as Cl−, Br−, or NO−3. When opting to dopant it should be performed meticulously, for dopant affects the cell growth, proliferation and behavior. Runge et al. As an example, the synthesized polycaprolactone (PCL)/PPY platform with various types of dopants and their effects are illustrated in Figure 3.

PPy is an attracting CP that has been frequently investigated for its efficacy towards the cell functions. Since the nineties, PPy has been studied as a cell culture substrate within in vitro culture methods. In addition, animal models have been used to study the effects of implantation in vivo. PPy have been utilized in artificial muscles, biosensors, drug delivery system, carrier of immobilized enzymes and tissue engineering. For example, Bueno et al. electropolymerized PPy in xanthan hydrogels (XCA). Under stress XCA-PPy showed larger strain than the XCA, probably due to the slipping of planar PPy chains. Fibroblast proliferation was more enunciated onto XCA-PPy than onto XCA, due to its higher hydrophobicity and surface roughness. Moreover, Haixia Liu and Ran Wan designed a biodegradable and electroactive scaffold consisting of magnesium (Mg), PPy-block-ploycaprolactone (PPy-PCL), and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as a core-shell-frame mode for tissue engineering usage. Conductive PPy-PCL layer coated the Mg nanoparticles due to corrosion stability, through the UV-induced photo-polymerization procedure, and then PLGA is added to control the biodegradation of the illative composite. In vitro experiments using 293FT-GFP cells demonstrated that the scaffold was biocompatible. Additionally, Guixin Shi and Mahmoud Rouabhia synthesized a new electrically conductive biodegradable material based on PPy nanoparticles and PLA using emulsion polymerization. Such substrate maintained a biologically significant DC current in a physiological milieu for 1000 h. Fibroblasts growth on such composite membranes was enhanced by the direct electron current applied through the membranes. Deng et al. have synthesized cryogel based on PPY in which the platform exhibited the thermal sensitivity, shape memory and photothermal properties.

2.2. Polyaniline

Polyaniline (PANi) is another best-determined CPs, which has variety of structural appearances, proper environmental durability and facility of charge transfer by the ‘doping/dedoping’ procedure. In 1985, MacDiarmid et al. investigated PANi as an electrically reliable material. Among CPs, PANi and its derivatives have achieved a growing portion of electroactive filed in tissue engineering. This was due to inimitable properties of this polymer including facile synthesis, variety of structural forms, superior thermal stability, high environmental constancy, in vitro compatibility, comfort accumulation of raw materials, and low cost. PANi has also been exhibited to have the potency to clean insidious free radicals from the environment, being a well troth to be used where tissues tolerate high oxidative stress especially post infarction. Moreover, according to some reports PANi has proper antibacterial function, especially for Gram-positive bacterium. Mattioli-Belmonte et al. illustrated and explained the biocompatibility of PANi in vitro and in vivo. A conductive form of PANi appeared when the nonconductive emeraldine base is doped with an acid. PANi is the only CP whose electrical properties can be adjusted properly via charge-transfer doping and/or protonation, Furthermore, the amount of electrons associated with the polymer backbone does not alter during the procedure, being capable to be introduced as the only non-redox doping CP. PANi has been determined to adjust cellular activities. However, degradability is commonly a favorable characteristic in tissue engineering scaffolds, the key restriction factor is non-biodegradability of CPs, causing the inflammation and contributing to the further surgery for obviation. To gadget this issue, supplying of low molecular weight oligoanilines (aniline trimer, tetramer and pentamer) has been examined by different researchers to display progressed processability and biodegradability. Oligoanilines were observed to undertake conductivity versus high molecular weight analogous, while their low molecular weight nature assisted direct digestion by macrophages following kidney clearance. This, in turn, decreases the chance of adverse foreign body reactions. Therefore, representing these moieties into the backbone of intrinsically biodegradable material may represent a promising method for the manufacturing of conductive biodegradable scaffolds. It was speculated that the molecular weight, functional end group, and dopant exhibit strong effect on oligoaniline biocompatibility. Self-dopant oligoaniline-based biomaterials can reduce the cell toxicity. Numerous studies have considered this issue through blending oligoanilines with materials having biodegradable segments like ester linkages, fast degradable polymers like PLA, or combining with natural polymers. In fact, it has been proved that the electrical conductivity of the hyper branched biodegradable CPs is much higher than that of their linear counterpoint with similar amounts of aniline pentamer. Aniline oligomer-based biomaterials have been used as an on-demand electrical drug release. In aqueous media, aniline oligomers tend to self-assemble and form vesicle and particle, which can encapsulate loaded drugs in scaffold. Applying electrical current can rupture the vesicle and release the drug (Figure 4).

2.3. Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)

Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) has lately been prospected as an option to PPy since it has higher resistance to oxidation and more conductivity. Contrary to PPy, PEDOT can preserve 89% of its conductivity under same conditions. Its high surface area and unique structures resulted in lower impedance which enhance its usage in bioelectrode coatings. In vitro toxicity and biocompatibility tests have shown that PEDOT, like PPy, has no cytotoxic effects on cells. Xufeng Niu and Mahmoud Rouabhia showed that a sorely thin coating of PEDOT on micro fibrous PLA network is of adequate conductivity and durability in hydrous milieu to maintain ES to cultured fibroblasts. PEDOT-coated fibers exhibited higher hydrophilicity, thermal stability, and lower glass transition temperature contrasted with the pristine PLA fiber. In a cytotoxicity test result, PLLA/PEDOT scaffold showed no cytotoxicity and supported human dermal fibroblast migration, adhesion, and proliferation. PEDOT was utilized for neural recording applications which in comparison with gold exhibit low impedance and high charge density; moreover nanofiber structure augmented its performance.

2.4. Polythiophene

The polythiophenes (PTh) are a group of CPs, which chemical modifications manifold their properties to suit various applications. The advantages of PThs over other conductive monomers (such as PPy) are that they are bowed to functionalization using a wide range of reaction conditions, which can be used in doped and neutral states with various properties. Thiophene, terthiophene, and bithiophene molecules as parent monomers are used to synthesize the polythiphene derivatives with different functionality and tailorable properties for various applications. Equated to investigations on PPy and PANi, studies on the suitability of PTh and its formatives in tissue engineering are fewer, and proportionately recent. The PThs were showed to have properties similar to, and in some cases more convenient, than other CPs.

2.5. Carbon

Naturall-y-occurring carbon allotropes come from variations in covalent binds of carbon atoms. Each of the carbon allotropes has specific properties based on the unparalleled spatial regulation of carbon atoms. Carbon allotropes comprise fullerene, diamond, DLC, graphite, and carbon nanotubes (CNT). “Graphene”, referring to the isolated two-dimensional crystal structures made of single atomic layers of graphite, presents great thermal and electrical conductivity due to its inimitable structure and strong carbon–carbon bonding. Furthermore, low defect density in the crystal lattice provides superior thermal and electrical conductivity in single layer graphene. Excellent electrical conductivity and thermal properties of graphene can be beneficial not only in electrical instruments but also in biomedical devices in order to measure cell potential and as a conductive platform in tissue engineering and biosensors. It has been shown that accompanying graphene to polymers can elevate the electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the originating nanocomposites. Recently, researches have shown that graphene membranes and hydrogels with high in-plane stiffness, can potentially be used as a biocompatible and transferable substrate for stem cell culture. CNTs can be assumed to form when a graphene sheet is twisted into a cylinder. Single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) form when one graphene sheet is rolled up, while extra concentric graphene sheets create a multiple wall carbon nanotube (MWNT). In addition, carbon nanofibers (CNFs) with poor arrangement of atoms form when graphene sheets are bent at some angle to form embankment of nanocones. CNTs are hollow nanostructures containing carbon atoms bound to each other using sp2 bonds, of which the key roles are bringing CNTs’ high electrical/thermal conductivity and mechanical properties. Excellent electrical conductivity of this aromatic structure is due to the fourth valence electron which is shared and mobile. In 1991, Lijima discovered CNTs for the first time. Since then, CNTs and CNFs have possessed increasing consideration due to their thermal, mechanical, optical, electrical, and structural features. Carbon meshes used in tissue engineering have frequently been provided from CNFs and CNTs, either single wall or multiwall and graphene. Their inimitable electrical and mechanical properties can be handled to form biomimetic tailored scaffolds. Some arguments exist in concerns to the biocompatibility of SWNT and MWNT, with some in vitro studies demonstrating that CNT has a cytotoxic effect while other studies reporting CNT to be an optimum platform for cellular growth. Functionalization of CNTs with active molecules makes them biocompatible which can be utilized in biomedical applications. Rare attempts have been carried out to expand pristine CNT-based substrate with lack of mechanical properties and elevated CNT toxicity, where the concatenation of CNTs within polymer composites has appeared as an arresting mostly invested. For example, in 2008 Sanjib Bhattacharyya and Samuel Guillot designed a nanocomposite consist of CNTs, by dispersing functionalized SWNTs in hyaluronic acid (HA) solutions in order to form hybrid HA hydrogels with SWNTs cross-linking using divinyl sulfone. This resulted in a significant variation in the topology of the hydrogels. The authors observed that the incorporation of 2% wt SWNT (vs HA) does not change water uptake capacity, while dramatically altering the dynamic mechanical properties of the hybrid hydrogels versus pristine ones. Furthermore, Hermant et al. reported the development of two species of SWNTs, namely, HiPCO SWNTs and Carbolex SWNTs in a SWNTPS/PEDOT: PSS system. The authors determined that in the composite with PEDOT: PSS the SWNTs do not mostly chip in the conductivity and reasonably act as a scaffold that assists the formation of an electrically infiltrating network of the PEDOT:PSS.

2.6. Silicon

The amorphous SiOx cover on single crystalline silicon core enables several modifications on Silicon nanowires (SiNWs) which are pertaining for biosensor and tissue engineering applications. SiNWs have tunable electrical conductivity, harmonic dimensions, and comfortable surface adjustability. Additionally, many researches proved the SiNWs’ biodegradablity, and that Si(OH)4, their main degradation residues, are metabolically enduring in vivo. This makes them profitable compared to other non-biodegradable, electrically conductive nanomaterials, particularly for in vivo applications’ capability. Nanostructured silicon as a biomaterial application has been largely reinforced by reports of easily calcium phosphate growth on the Si surface as an important bioactive material.

2.7. Gold

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are achieving considerable attention due to their biocompatibility and relative ease of functionalization with various organic and biological moieties. AuNPs have been successfully applied in many biological implementations to make a inimitable cellular environment that merges controllable conductivity and elasticity, which are favorable for tissue engineering. McKeon-Fischer and Freeman demonstrated that low cell proliferation is not due to Au toxicity but may be a sign for myotube differentiation. An electroactive, biocompatible, and biodegradable scaffold containing electrospun PLLA nanofibers with high amounts of AuNps, was prepared for skeletal muscle tissue engineering that could perhaps need lower voltages to develop myotube formation. Despite the fact that AuNps are settled of an inactive material, biocompatibility distributions have to be taken into account. Modification with AuNP alters material nanotopography which could affect a vast range of cell activities. Cells in contact to AuNps go under a phagocytosis process and therefore the particles are accumulated inside the cells in perinuclear sections (structures adjacent to the cell nucleus). Regarding cytotoxic effects, one has to recognize the effects related to the nature of the material as well as the effects prevalent to nanoparticles. At the same time, inert particles such as gold expressed tissue inflammations due to the presence of gold nanoparticles within the cell. However, in cell culture experiments AuNps are considered as biocompatible, and serious cytotoxicity has not been observed yet, as well as in in vivo and pre-clinical scenarios.

2.8. Melanin

Melanin is a light absorber polymer achieved from the oxidation of tyrosine. Melanin is widely interspersed in animals and plants. It is the main pigment existing in the vertebrate’s surface. Eumelanins is the main component of melanin, in which it could be the extended heteropolymers of 5, 6-dihydroxyindole and 5, 6dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid. These heteropolymers can gather to form accumulates with strong π-π interactions, which supply the chemical foundation for the inimitable features of melanins.

Although the exact conduction mechanisms are not clear, physical form, temperature, and the hydration state are three factors that affect the electrical conductance of melanins, which largely ranges from 10−8 S/m to 10−3 S/m. The inimitable electrical properties of melanins propose their potential application as conductive biomaterial scaffolds in cardiac tissue engineering. Melanin is a natural photoprotectant of skin and hair with antioxidant features, which can be used in Parkinson’s disease. For instant, Dan Kai et al. suggested conductive nanofibers including 10% melanin that ameliorates cell interaction. Furthermore, improved electrical stimuli transfer (rectangular, 150 ms, 1 V/cm, 1 Hz) through the scaffolds exhibited improved cell proliferation, alignment, coupling, and the expression of connexin-43.

2.9. Calcium Titanate

Calcium titanate (CaTiO3) possesses an orthorhombic architecture at ambient temperature, and the structure turns into tetragonal at 600 °C and cubic at 1000 °C. From the optical density studies on single-crystal CaTiO3, Linz and Herrington determined the band-gap energy of 3.4 eV (at 300 °K). Thrivikraman and Mallik used spark plasma sintered HA-CaTiO3 as a pattern system to determine the influence of altering conductivity on cell behaviors. In addition, mouse myoblast cells (C2C12) were seeded on scaffold which observed that the cell proliferation was enhanced. Generally, this work convincingly appoints the favorable effect of the platform conductivity to cell proliferation and differentiation besides corroborates the efficiency of HA-CaTiO3 biocomposites as conductive substrate to comfort the growth and proliferation of myoblasts, even when seeded without exterior electric field.

3.1. Nerve Tissue Engineering

In advanced community, recuperation from spinal cord injuries (SCI) and neurodegenerative diseases (NDD) enumerates one of the biggest universal general health challenges. For in vitro/vivo studies, the principal demands for the substrate are non-cytotoxicity and mechanical properties of scaffolds necessitate to be appropriate for neural tissue expansion. Moreover, surface topography and intrinsic porosity of the scaffold affect cell proliferation and differentiation. Human body reacts to electrical stimulations and the key incorporator of neural transmission in the body is the action potential created at the synapse. This infers that a perfect neural scaffold should also own electrical conductivity to assist neurite outgrowth and thereby elevate nerve regeneration in culture.

Neurons have a potential of using comparatively weak electrochemical currents in mV range for controlling cellular activities. Electrically-conductive substrates can help to transfer these necessary signals among neurons, which have a positive effect on the expansion of neural tissue. Conductive scaffolds were used in nerve tissue engineering. Pires et al. cross-linked PEDOT: PSS, then neural stem cells were cultured in laminin coated substrate, and differentiated over eight days in the lack of those factors under 100 Hz pulsed DC electrical stimulation, 1 V with 10 ms pulses. The total number of neurons was 1.6 times higher with longer neurite for cells cultured under electrical motivation. Such stimulations were also directed to longer neurons. It was the first time that PEDOT:PSS combination was used to extend human neural stem cells through the implementation of pulsed signals, influencing on their differentiation directed to neurons and promoting to longer neurite. Huang et al. fabricated a biodegradable conductive composite containing PPy and chitosan for electrically stimulation of Schwann cells. Their results revealed that low potential (100 mV/mm) stimulations can have useful effects on cellular activities but superior potentials (300–1000 mV/mm) have damaging influences. Neurite outgrowth was highly elevated by electrical stimulation when electrical stimulation was applied through the conductive scaffold in vivo. Altogether, Schwann cell production of nerve growth factor (NGF) and Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was considerably elevated by electrical stimulation, which might further contribute neurite outgrowth and nerve regeneracy.

Thitima et al. constructed a new biomaterial for neural tissue engineering applications by coating electrospun PLA nanofibers with an electroactive polymer, PPy, via admicellar polymerization. Cell culture experiments demonstrated that PPy-coated electrospun PLA scaffold has no toxicity in vitro and could promote adhesion and immigration of neural progenitor cells. It should be noted that the PPy-coated random fibers were accidently oriented and had innumerable connections between coated fibers, while the organized fibers gave more electron current path along the PPy surface. One of the main hindrances involving the field of electrically CPs such as PANi is difficult processing and therefore electrospinning of PANi still continues a great problem. To solve this challenge, most of the researchers have electrospun PANi by blending it with other spinnable polymers, though it reduced the conductivity of the composite fibers. For example, Prabhakaran et al. in their study designed electrospun conductive nanofibers of PANi/PLLA. Electrical stimulation along this conductive nanofibrous scaffolds showed elevated cell proliferation and neurite outgrowth versus the PANi/PLLA scaffolds that were not subjected to electrical stimulation. As it was discussed recently, PANi is prevalently being used for the preparation of scaffolds which can electrically motivate cells so that regulate specific cellular functions and, eventually, the procedure of tissue regeneration.

Engineered scaffold can affect the cell alignment and elongation. Micropatterned conductive substrate based on poly (glycerol sebacate) and aniline pentamer was synthesized and Schwann cell and PC12 were seeded on. It was observed that, such platform along with enhancement of the cells alignment and neurite elongation increases the nerve growth factor (NGF) gene expression of Schwann cells. Comparison between Figure 5a–c and Figure 5d–f, it divulged that seeded cells on conductive substrate exhibit the multiple neurite from cell bodies, more neurite terminus and longer neurite length.

Guarino et al. synthesized PANi and hydrogel cross-linked incorporated to allow the preparation of materials with good conductive manner. The attendance of PANi obviously picked up the conductivity of the material to (1.1 ± 0.5) × 10−3 mS/cm with a PANi content of 3% wt. In vitro studies corroborated that 3% wt PANi also promotes the biological reaction of PC12 and hMSC cells. PANi/Polyethyleneglycol diacrylate macroporous hydrogel add new usefulness regarding morphological and conductive attributes, both of which are necessary requirement to guide neural cells in regenerative pathways. Wu et al. synthesized the conductive polyurethane based on aniline oligomer which ameliorated the Schwann cells myelin gene expression. It was speculated that the CaSR and PLCβ pathway was blocked by conductive substrate and then Ca2+ level of intracellular decreased. Intracellular Ca2+ level and DAG decrement resulted in PKC inactivation; hence, protein kinase enzyme activated other signal pathways like mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) which can affect the cell behavior like differentiation, migration and secretion (Figure 6).

Zarrintaj et al. synthesized the polysaccharide based conductive substrate with various length of aniline oligomer. It was reported that the conductive polysaccharide can be good candidate for neural regeneration because of resembling ECM.

Conductive platform along with directs electrical signal transfer, assists neural growth. Functionalization and bioactive coating are suggested to ameliorate the biocompatibility of CNT-based scaffolds. According to Mattson et al. aldehyde 4-hydroxynonenal is desired because of its influences in raising intracellular Ca2+ concentration, improving cytoskeletal proteins and signaling pathways that direct neurite expansion. Using this plan, MWNTs were coated with 4-HNE to control neural cell activities. Results demonstrated that SWNTs can be functionalized to promote neuron growth and expanding that is decisive in neural regeneration. Moreover, Kabiri et al. compared the neural differentiation and proliferation of stem cells on three distinctive aligned electrospun scaffolds composed of PLLA complemented with either SWNT or MWNT. Adding nanotube impregnated conductivity to the scaffolds and directed mouse embryonic stem cells for neural differentiation as proved by a development of mature neuronal markers expression.

The neural stem cells as a multipotent cell type in the CNS, which display undertaking outlooks in expansion cell therapies for neural regeneration. A scaffold that adjusts neural stem cell action and tissue improvement by constructing milieu has been a perfume in clinical usages. At the present time, the combining carbon nanomaterials propose numerous occasions to prepare novel scaffolds as neural tissue engineering. Li et al. revealed that the application of graphene foam as a novel platform for neural stem cells in vitro. A good electrical connecting of 3D-GFs with differentiated NSCs for impressive electrical stimulation was seen. Their research signified 3D-GFs could tender a formidable intent for neural stem cell research, nerve tissue engineering, and neural interface. The cyclic voltammetry results implied that it involves low risk for three-dimensional graphene foams (3D-GF) to electrically stimulate cells via capacitive charge injection like 2D graphene electrode. However, due to its high surface area, it could supply much stronger charge injection capability than 2D graphene films with the same geometrical area. As a result, the 3D architecture of GFs can impressively enhance the electrical stimulation actions of conductive scaffold. Furthermore, it was found that in contrast to two-dimensional graphene films, 3D-GFs can promote neural stem cells growth and Ki67 expression. Table 2 summarizes the conductive scaffold for neural regeneration.

3.2. Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering

Cardiovascular disease is the most prevalent reasons of death in developed countries and it is becoming an epizootic menace of the 21st century. Among different strategies, tissue engineering and cell biology have recently found some innovative ways to shed light over finding new treatment approaches. It is believed that the exact function of cardiomyocytes (CM: contractile muscle cells that are specialized for myocardium tissue) and neurons is supported by on persevering conductivity. It is also known that heart disease or improper functioning may interrupt such conductivity. Myocardial infarction (MI) is the most usual reason of heart failure and distraction. Behind an immense CM loss owing to MI, the myocardial tissue misses considerable intrinsic regenerative ability to swap the lost cells, thus the disorder of the heart wall muscle is everlasting.

Numerous methods have been used to enhance CM and neuron development near defunct tissue after a MI. Such projects possess ex vivo culture of CM on cardiac patches for direct cell injection, probable implantation, scaffolds based on collagen, PLA, PCL, 3D printing, and injectable scaffolds using materials adorning from fibrin to CNFs. Each method has its own superiorities however usually all of the above can be detached into two categories: (a) Conductive patches and (b) non-conductive patches. One of the most trustworthy tactics among the above is cardiac tissue engineering. The major difficulty in tissue engineering is to imitate the structural and functional properties of ECM, thus constructing a bioactive platform possess suitable chemical, biological, and conductive properties. Versus the natural heart tissue milieus, the porous substrate have a few artificial characteristics. First, the scaffolds are non-conductive at biological frequencies, but heart tissues have a DC conductivity of about 0.1 S/m and are emphasizing with electrically conductive Purkinje fibers. Secondly, many scaffolds do not have nanofibrous structures at nano scale round 10–100 nm diameters, which are plentiful in natural ECMs and possess a crucial role in controlling cellular functions. Thirdly, the scaffolds have typically more weak mechanical properties than the native heart muscles. Wu et el. synthesized the interwoven directed conductive nanofiber to recapitulate the cardiac tissue. Figure 7 illustrates the cardiac tissue structure which was the inspiration of 3D scaffold fabrication. 3D yarn/hydrogel scaffold mimicked the cardiac structure and conducting 3D cellular arrangement. Such scaffold enhanced the cellular orientation and proliferation which can be a harbinger for ultimate cardiac regeneration.

Electroconductive materials have been acknowledged to be useful for myocardial tissue engineering due to the capability to be used as a substrate that controls electrical stimulation. Li and colleagues showed that nanofibrous scaffolds made of gelatin and PANi as a conductive platform supported H9C2 annex and proliferation. This study demonstrates the first phase in their long-term tactics of seeding cells on nano-fibrous scaffolds made of CP. Conditional upon the concentrations of PANi, the cells primarily showed different topologies on the fibrous scaffold. Later Dan Kai and coworkers reported an electrospun PCL-gelatin-PPy scaffold that advanced CM annex, proliferation and presentation of cardiac-specific proteins. Nanofibers made of 15% PPy represented the most equivalent properties of conductivity, mechanical properties, and biodegradation, corresponding to the provisions for repairing of cardiac tissue. After that Benjamin Spearman et al. demonstrated that after culturing CM on the conductive PPy-PCL substrates, more cells were distinguished to possess peripheral localization of the gap junction protein connexin-43. This composite had a resistance of 1.0 ± 0.4 kΩ cm, which is equivalent to natural cardiac muscle. Consequentially, faster calcium wave spreading rate and shorter calcium temporary period for CM monolayers on PPy-PCL associated to cells on PCL. Liang et al. synthesized the cardiac patch based on PPy-dopamin which was applied using injection (Figure 8). Such method attracted a significant attention because of its non-invasive nature and elimination of surgical operation. After injection, hydrogel formed and due to its conductivity, which is equal to normal myocardium is powerfully bonded to the beating heart. It is a promising method to eliminate the surgical operation.

The cooperation between conductive scaffold and stem cells offers a chance to prevail MI. Borriello et al. determined that the conducting PCL/PANi platform could be done as a suitable substrate to promote MSC differentiation to CM lineage. Their results proposed that PANi short fibers conduct electrical stimulations impressively. The authors revealed that the viability of CM-like cells onto PCL/PANi substance was considerably superior to that on the PCL. Furthermore, the presentation of sarcomeric α-actinin was also approved on a conductive platform. Moreover, Spencer W Crowder and colleagues introduces an electrospun PCL including CNT to specify MSCs fate. This scaffold surrounded inherent potency enhancing rod-like and prolonged morphology in 3D culture. Outcomes showed that differentiation of hMSC can be improved by culturing on conductive scaffolds.

Additionally, the exhorting actions gained by using CPs, for instance, CNTs with nanostructure can emulate the ECM. Valentina Martinelli and colleagues showed that CNT platforms assist CM growth and puberty by changing the gene expression program, doing the cell electrophysiological attributes and enhancing networking and puberty of syncytia. They showed that ventricular myocytes cultured on scaffolds of MWNT communicate with CNTs by forming firm osculations and show enhanced survival rate and proliferation. Later Xia Li et al. indicated that the poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)/SWNTs hydrogel showed considerably higher bioactivities to encapsulated stem cells compared to one-fold PNIPAAm hydrogel, containing improving cell attachment and proliferation, in vitro. Furthermore, when acting as a vehicle for intramyocardial delivery of stem cells after MI, the PNIPAAm/SWNTs gel considerably assisted the hybridization of culturing cells in infarct myocardium and increased their therapeutic efficacies. Lately, Stout et al. presented a PLGA-CNF composite for cardiac tissue engineering. Aortic endothelial, fibroblast, and CM cells were seeded onto a PLGA: CNF scaffold to distinguish if CNF concentration has an influence on cellular activity. Throughout consecutive ES, CM cell density increased compared to its static counterpoint. A lesser raise in Troponin I excretion in ES in comparison to the static state demonstrated nominal CM cell activity within cell cultures. Fibroblast and endothelial cell growth studies demonstrated the material prevented or stopped proliferation during both static and ES, thus promoting the growth of CM onto the damaged tissue area. Moreover, the findings showed that CNF concentration exhibited an influence on PLGA:CNF scaffold in vitro compatibility features with the proper results achieving from the 50:50 (PLGA:CNF). Furthermore Kharaziha et al. fabricated hard and flexible hybrid scaffolds with improved electrical attributes containing CNTs detruded aligned poly (glycerol sebacate): Gelatin nanofibers. The resulting CNT-PG scaffolds showed more powerful instinctive and simultaneous beating action evaluated to those seeded on PG scaffold. Totally, their results showed that aligned CNT-PG scaffold have excellent mechanical attributes with elevated CM beating attributes.

Dissident to the usefulness of cell-based therapies in regenerating infarcted myocardial tissues, lack of electrical communications between donor cells and the host myocardium is caused by the absence of functional merging of them. To reconstruct the contractile heart muscle, electroactive scaffolds are employed in order to graft implanted cells with the host tissue in a simultaneous strategy. The electroactive portion of scaffolds signifies identical stimulatory of implanted and host cells, and also promote distribution of the electrical wave front. Chun-Wen Hsiao et al. suggested a nanofiber mesh of PANi and PLGA, as a conductive layer for adapting the beatings of the seeded CMs simultaneously. Accordingly, after electrical stimulation contractions of the single clusters grown on the conductive platform were contemporized, and the cell beating frequency was similar to the electrical potential. Su Ryon Shin and coworkers specified that the presence of CNT as a conductive factor in gelatin-methacrylate hydrogel resulted in promoting myocardial cell attachment, organization, and cell–cell communication. Moreover, 2D engineered cardiac tissue on CNT-gelatin-methacrylate showed suitable mechanical unity tolerating tissue constriction. Combination CNT to the structure decreased stimulation limen about 85% lower. Actually, CNT networks connected the insulating pore walls of the hydrogel, supplied additional paths for straight electrical charge flow, and decreased the impedance between cells for charge redistribution and action potential dissemination. Furthermore, Hongyu Sun et al. introduced SWNTs blended into collagen scaffolds were used as growth carriers for CMs, which promoted CM adhesion and proliferation. Moreover, they found that the presence of CNTs significantly incremented intercalated disc (ID: a well-organized structure that attaches myocytes into a syncitium electromechanically and supply propagation of electrical diagonals in every part of the heart) protein expression and improved ID congregation and activity. On that foundation, they further probed the fundamental mechanism for how CNTs promoted ID assembly. They discovered that the signaling pathway of β1-integrin-mediated intervened CNT-induced regulation of mechanical and electrical junction proteins. Particularly, CNTs significantly precipitated gap junction formation using β1- integrin-mediated FAK/ERK/GATA4 pathway activation. These results supply a noteworthy understanding into the mechanistic influences that CNTs cause on neonatal CM actions.

Electrical signals’ dissemination through natural myocardium causes ordered constriction of the heart, then blood pumping throughout the body. An unfit mechanical junction between CMs terminates to an annihilated cardiac pumping; presented improper electrical junction may end to incomplete conduction of the electrical impulse and pursuant pickup of cardiac arrhythmias. Tal Dvir et al. declared that flexible gold nanostructure in alginate hydrogel can merge the insulated pore walls of alginate and promote electrical connection between cardiac cells and their neighbors. In this way, thicker- and further-aligned tissue grown on this platform and cells in these tissues contracted simultaneously. Elsewhere, Tan et al. specified that adhesion of a trace amount of conductive silicon wires in differently scaffold-free cardiac spheroids can create an electroactive mesh, outstanding to simultaneous and considerably improved constriction, terminating in more developed contractile maturation and cellular structural.

The study mentioned earlier is the first explanation of using nanostructure semiconductors to advance cardiac tissue formation and CM maturation without importing contractual scaffolding materials. Notwithstanding all these attempts, it is regarded that the usage of electroactive biomaterials is just restricted to in vitro maturing engineered cardiac tissues, and it subsists to be elucidated whether electroactive biomaterials can advocate functional engineered cardiac tissue-formation in vivo, perform beneficial traces on the heart function, or claim the structural and functional accretion between engineered cardiac tissues and infarcted myocardium based on their nanoscale attributes. One challenge is weak cellular totality in engineered cardiac tissues constructed using current procedures. This is particularly reflected in the insufficient regenerating of IDs.

Arterial blood vessels have a multi-layer construction including collagen and elastin fibers, smooth muscle, and a complex construction of endothelium. Blood vessels have a different round structure due to the orientation of their fibrous parts. A.S. Rowlands for the first time showed that vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) seeded on a CP layer and subject to ES not only present improved proliferation but can be contemporaneously patronized to excess contractile protein expression. In this research VSMCs were seeded on PPy layer and were exposed to a 50-mA sinusoidal ES at 0.05, 5, and 500 Hz. Such layers were coated with collagen IV followed by Matrigel and doped with HA in order to imitate the tissue and promote cell adhesion. Enhanced proliferation and expression of smooth muscle phenotype markers (smooth muscle α-actin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain) were monitored in cultures stimulated at 5 and 500 Hz. Moreover, Mihardja et al. prepared an injectable hydrogel of alginate merged to PPy as a conductive platform. Local injection of polymer mixture in to the infarct area produced considerably better levels of arteriogenesis. Moreover, this scaffold considerably improved migration of myofibroblasts into the infarct zone. The conductive scaffold for cardiovascular regeneration is summarized in Table 3.

3.3. Bone Tissue Engineering

In 1950, bone was found to present inherent electrical attributes such as piezoelectricity. These attributes create an internal electrical field in response to tensions that change cell proliferation, which can describe why exterior electric and electromagnetic excitation have an advanced effect in bone healing therapy. The electrical potentials happened in bone due to the mechanical loading, which is described in terms of both the piezoelectric features of the collagen in bone and by the motion of ionic fluids through the structure. These potentials have been connected to the mechanical conformity of bone in response to loading, outstanding to the recommendation that using an electrically active part in an implant material may enhance healing and conformity of the circumambient tissue. It was shown that such excitation improve osteoblasts activity. Figure 9 exhibits various electrical stimulation methods which have been utilized for bone regeneration. DC decreases the level of oxygen and enhances the pH; hence, osteoblast cell proliferation increases. In second method, capacitive coupling results in an increment in cystolic calcium through voltage gated calcium channels and finally inductive coupling result in a direct increment in intracellular calcium, which increases activated calmodulin stores.

Progress studies in 3D scaffolds prepared for bone tissue engineering are frequently afforded to enhance the attributes of the scaffolds in regard to their chemical and mechanical attributes. To incorporate the tissue engineering methods with the idea of improving the bone healing by electrical stimulation, the electrical attributes of the scaffolds needs to be corrected. The CP such as PPy and PANi have been vastly used and researched due to their comfortable and helpful synthesis, manageable electrochemical activity, and great compatibility in vitro. Haitao Cui et al. in their research prepared a novel electroactive polyelectrolyte based on tetreaniline and poly (L-glutamic acid), that manufactured through layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly strategy. In comparison to the nongrafted polyelectrolyte multilayer films, the tetreaniline-grafted samples demonstrated superior stiffness and roughness in micro/nano structures. The surface specifications and the typical electroconductive attributes were more useful for cellular activity of preosteoblasts MC3T3-E1 cells. Furthermore, the improved influences were seen on the incorporation of MC3T3-E1 cells, when the electroactive polyelectrolyte multilayer films were coupled with ES, particularly in the initial phase of the osteoblasts differentiation.

Since the 1980s, CPs with admissible biocompatibility have been applied in several biomedical usages. CPs intervene ES and have the capability to be the motivating factor that increases bone regeneration. PEDOT is a biocompatible CP which is lately being operated in biomedical usages particularly in bone tissue engineering. Shahini et al. in their research fabricated 3D conductive scaffolds by hiring a biocompatible CP, i.e., PEDOT:PSS in the optimized nanocomposite of gelatin and bioactive glass. Adult human MSCs were cultured on the substrates, for in vitro examination. Their outcomes demonstrated that such conductive scaffolds are not only structurally desirable for bone tissue engineering, but also can be an approach in incorporating the tissue engineering methods with the method of improving the bone healing by electrical stimulation. In 2014, Liu and Cui showed the cytocompatibility of the aniline pentamer-graft-gelatin/PLLA nanofibers in vitro by the attachment and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. The cellular expansion was considerably larger on electroactive aniline pentamer-graft-gelatin/PLLA nanofibers than on PLLA nanofibers. Moreover, the aniline pentamer–graft–gelatin/PLLA nanofibers motivated by an electrical pulsed indication could enhance the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells evaluated with pristine PLLA nanofibers. Their outcomes showed that the conductive and biodegradable PLLA/aniline pentamer/gelatin nanofibers had capability of being as bone scaffold materials in tissue engineering in vivo.

Graphene has obtained exceptional attention in various applications according to its inimitable physical attributes. Lately, several research groups have demonstrated that graphene boosts cellular activities. In 2015, Lyu et al. tested the influence of applying a graphene hydrogel to compel the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. Compared on arbitrary graphene and carbon fiber films, the hydrogel had enhanced mechanical stability and malleability. Moreover, they discovered that the hydrogel has no cytotoxicity and is biocompatible. One advantage is that film could motive the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs by oneself free of extra chemical signals. Such influences are more powerful for such hydrogel than others; the induction valiancy of the hydrogel is not as high as that of the osteogenic induced medium. The superior osteoinductivity of the hydrogel is nearly linked to its considerable physical attributes that contain special nanoscale structures, surface topology, cell adhesion, surface hydrophilicity, and protein absorption. In 2011, Meng et al. seeded osteoblasts-like Saos-2 cells on an electroactive layer made of PLA and bioactivated PPy using heparin (PPy/HE). The influence of multiple electrical stimulations on osteoblast mineralization was considered at many culture periods using electrical cell culture plates. As confirmed by surface analysis, the electrical stimulation was capable of elevating osteoblast growth and adhesion, causing considerably higher calcium and phosphate concentration in the mineral precipitation of the electrically motivated meshes with similar characteristic features to hydroxyapatite. Electrical stimulation also considerably up ordered the expression of the osteoblasts-specific markers Runt Related Transcription Factor 2 (RRTF-2), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), and Osteocalcin. Hence electrical stimulation through a synthetic CPs platform shows a vital factor to enhance bone regeneration. In 2013, Shiyun Meng et al. seeded Saos-2 cells on conductive substrates containing biodegradable PLA and the heparin-PPy to study their response to ES intervened through such scaffolds. Interval and strength of electrical stimulation improved cell proliferation, generating an inimitable electrical intensity and provisional “window” within which osteoblasts proliferation was up-modulated in comparison to the down modulation or ineffectiveness in other electrical stimulation zones. The desirable electrical stimulation intensity around 200 mV/mm was more considered gene activation and protein production of two significant osteoblasts markers described by ECM maturation and mineralization that is AP and osteocalcin. In 2007, Melanie A. Whitehead and Dongmei Fan discussed about of preparation and analysis of an electrically conductive composite material containing PCL, PANi, and silicon. The efficacy of PANi/silicon on calcium phosphate infusion was determined through ex vitro experiment using ES. Formation of calcium phosphate is one conceivable eligible specifications of “intelligent” synthetic scaffolds for orthopedic-pertinent usages. Moreover, electrical consistency evaluations were done in DMEM to assess the constancy of such structures to bias in a reliable electrolyte via a classic cell research. The composites cytocompatibility was measured in vitro via HEK293 cell proliferation, together with more orthopedically pertaining MSCs from mouse stroma. Significantly, these composites show precipitated calcification in simulated body fluid when electrical bias is used catholically to the scaffold. Moreover, these substrates display non-cytotoxicity in the vicinity of fibroblasts during culture period, and annex of stromal cells to the semiconducting scaffold was directly assessed via scanning electron microscopy. Generally, these outcomes propose that such materials are capable to be as a biomaterial. Table 4 abridges the conductive scaffold in bone tissue engineering

3.4. Muscular Tissue Engineering

Skeletal muscle tissue includes brindled nanoscale fibrous morphologies convened into fiber fardel which contract upon motivation by an attached nerve. Electrical stimulation has been applied in some clinical trials to considerably help spinal fusion and in the functional recovery and regenerating of muscle in patients who have tolerated denervation. It has been presented that lasting low-frequency electrical stimulation affects myoblast growth and differentiation via duplicating some bioelectric signals. The progression of new tissue engineering experiments for skeletal muscle is serious for the renovation of lost or defective muscle that can happen as a result of traumatic damage or neuromuscular perturbations, such as the Muscular dystrophies. From a biomimetic outlook, functional engineered skeletal muscle tissues must display indigenous-like structural attributes and, particularly, include compactly packed and uniformly aligned myofibers all over a relevantly large tissue volume.

Another option contains the implantation of prefabricated muscle tissue formed by the in vitro differentiation and puberty of muscle pioneer cells on a matrix or layer. New muscle tissue is expanded in vitro by managing the environmental situations and containing differentiation, with the procedure being seriously related to the material acting as the scaffold for the cells. Recently, engineering of compact, directed, feigned muscle tissues with a comparatively large area was assayed by consecutively layering collagen matrix and culturing myoblasts in a culture dish. One group of materials with potential as a breathtaking candidate for skeletal muscle tissue engineering is CPs. CPs are surmised wonderful as they not only prepare a scaffold for mechanical support, but through their natural conductive attributes can also transfer different stimulation to the cells. Sung In Jeong and coworkers demonstrated that blending PANi to poly (L-lactide-co-e-caprolactone) scaffold makes ameliorated myoblast cell annex and metabolic activity. The growth of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts is improved under the incitement of several direct current flows between 0-200 mA. In the same study Indong Jun et al. demonstrated that blending of PANi to PLA-PCL scaffold, the number of myocyte cells positive for sarcomeric myosin was 3.6-times higher on the electrically conductive fibers after 4 days of culture. Moreover, the level of myogenin expression deciphered on day 8 of culture on PLA-PCL/PANi-15 (containing 15% PANi) was nearly 1.6-fold greater than the PLA-PCL/PANi-0 fibers. Equivalent outcomes were seen for the expression of other genes containing troponin T (2-fold greater) and the myosin heavy chain gene (3-fold greater). Wang et al. synthesized the nanofiber yarn/hydrogel core–shell scaffolds for mimicking skeletal muscle (Figure 10). The synthesized scaffold recapitulated the native skeletal muscle tissue which resulted in 3D cellular alignment inducement and elongated myotube formation. The aligned core-shell nanofiber was fabricated by electrospinning based on PCL/PANi/Slik which 3D structure enhanced the nutrient exchange and provided the proper milieu for better alignment and differentiation.

A great attention for the engineering of muscle is the capability to restitute tissue in suitable orientation reflecting. Particularly, myotubes should be designed in a linear arrangement to express native muscle structure, which is organized as extremely linear, non-branched bundles in vivo. This organization is in part interposed through the physical and biological attributes of the ECM. The ECM of skeletal muscle includes a nanofibrous network of proteins. Such structure has been repeated ex vivo resulting in the linear orientation of differentiated initial skeletal muscle cells grown on microstructured CP platforms. This efficacy has also been attained at the nanoscale using biodegradable nanofibers, showing that nanoengineered scaffolds prepare the capability to control muscle fiber orientation. The capability to restrain the expansion of myoblasts into orientated myotubes is important for efficient muscle engineering. As an example, Quigley et al. conceived a novel nanostructured conductive scaffold made of aligned MWNT with and without para-toluene sulphonic acid doped PPy. Electrochemical analysis of these substrates demonstrated better electrochemical activity in MWNT after coating. Myoblasts attached, proliferated and differentiated on all collected surfaces sans the use of interpolation molecules. Myotubes grown on nanostructured surfaces showed alignment.

A considerable increment in myotube alignment and length was also discovered on linear functionalized MWNT arrays. The gamut of myotube alignment was discovered to reduce with increasing film thickness. A considerable increment in cell density and myotube formation was distinguished in the electrically motivated group. In two outstanding projects, Ku et al. and Chen et al. divulged that myosin heavy chain expression, multinucleate myotube formation, the emanation of differentiation special genes, the differentiation of myoblasts on PCL/PANi electrospun nanofibers was strongly dependent on both nanofiber alignment and PANi concentration. These outcomes displayed that a composed effect of both guidance cues were more efficacious than a single cue. Conductive scaffold which are utilized for muscular tissue engineering is listed in Table 5.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

CPs were demonstrated to be able to tune cellular actions via ES such as cell growth and cell migration, leading to a significant interest in CPs and their derivatives for tissue engineering usages. Several research studies are linked to various tissues, which are susceptible to electrical stimulation. This exhibits the significance of CPs in tissue engineering, because the regulation of cellular demeanor is conclusive for the regeneration of blemished tissues. However, there are applied obstacles when the CPs are employed in tissue engineering. The original impediments with the available systems are poor polymer–cell interactions, the absenteeism of cell interaction sites, hydrophobicity, poor solubility and processability, as well as uncontrollable mechanical attributes. Their incapacitation to degrade is one of the greatest constraints for tissue engineering usages. Keeping CPs in vivo for a long time may clasp an inflammatory reaction and the requirement for a second surgical process. The synthesis of materials with both electroactive and degradable attributes is extremely favorable and is still a challenge. There are different fabrication and synthesis paths of biodegradable and electrically CPs using both CPs to form mixes and composites as well as conducting oligomers to form biodegradable and electroactive copolymers.

Provision of clinically appropriate CPs-based tissue scaffolds with biomimetic chemical, mechanical, and topological attributes is the other challenge in this field. These materials can be constructed in a diversity of ways. Biomimetic chemical methods are innovative approaches recently attained that non-covalently combine both high and low molecular weight components/derivatives of the ECM as dopants during electropolymerization reactions. An ECM-mimicking structure can also be exposed to materials by covalently modifying their surfaces with ECM derivatives, generally employing carbodiimide chemistry. Materials composed of CPs only tend to be relevantly inelastic because the polymers have confined conformational freedom in 3D, result in film preparation via electropolymerization rip. This demonstrates a significant problem, as the handling of biomedical products are of key significance to their successful repented from the laboratory to the clinic. Flexible conductive biomaterials can be constructed by interspersing a large-enough quantity of conductive filler within an elastomeric matrix, such as PCL or polyurethane or gathered from multiblock copolymers composed of intermittent blocks of conducting and elastomeric blocks, such as PPy and PCL. The development of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic wrapped structured natural tissues will be the focus of significant interest in the next few years. Among different strategies, electrospinning is a general method of preparing nanofibrous tissue engineering scaffolds with a tunable degree of fiber alignment nearly similar to the native tissue structure.

One of the most challenging issues in tissue engineering is achieving tissue-specific functions. As an example, since hepatocyte cells are anchorage-dependent cells and highly susceptible to the ECM milieu for the keeping of their viability and differentiated functions, liver tissue engineering requires a suitable ECM for hepatocyte cell culture. On the other hand, since initial hepatocytes lose their phenotype quickly after isolation, impounding liver-specific functions has been the main goal of these studies. By implementing innovative physical and chemical strategies, favorable aspects of tissue engineering can be mimic for specific interactions between scaffolds and cell surface receptors. Hence, the design and selection of biomaterials for tissue engineering scaffolds are of great importance. To gain higher levels of tissue-specific function and mechanical consistency, culturing cells have been tested on different conductive biomaterials.

Surface charge and conductivity of biomaterials and different kinds of cells ascertain a communication between the surface voltage, the rest potential, and a control over differentiation and proliferation. It has been determined that the rest potential of cancer and stem cells, which have excellent proliferation rates, are much lower than any kind of adult differentiated cells. After cancer and stem cells, among all the differentiated cells, liver cells are the most depolarized cells within the human body. This phenomenon can be affirmatively influenced in the attendance of conducting biomaterials. In fact, the CPs will conduct the specific charge of the cells that will be resisted in other scaffolds due to resistant materials (e.g., natural polymers) used in the scaffold compositions. The conducted charge can make local electrical fields inside the seeded scaffolds, which will cause regulation of the ion transfer and movement across the membrane and further influence the cellular behaviors, such as cell attachment, cell proliferation, and proteins expression. Some recent studies on hepatocyte cells in tissue engineering scaffolds with different compositions showed that the scaffolds including (PEDOT) could provide the best situation for annex and proliferation of the cells. More particularly, the mixture of hyaluronan, PEDOT, and collagen (I) as dopants in gelatin–chitosan-based scaffolds could introduce the best cell/scaffold actions for regeneration of cells.

The development of innovative biomaterials as structural and bioactive scaffolds is not only essential for tissue engineering but also important for cellular biophysics. Bozhi Tian et al. have recently designed a new type of macroporous nanowire nanoelectronic scaffolds. This class of nanoelectronic scaffolds could mimic the structure of normal tissue scaffolds, organized by self-organization of coplanar reticular networks with built-in strain and by manipulation of 2D mesh matrices. This is one of the important studies showing robust electronic characteristics that have been used lonely or combined with other biomaterials as biocompatible extracellular scaffolds for 3D culture of neurons, CMs and smooth muscle cells.

The current researches can potentially solve problems associated with the conventional scaffolds that could not electrically probe the physicochemical and biological microenvironments throughout their 3D interior, which can have a noticeable impact in both electronics and biomaterials. Furthermore, the integrated sensory capability of conductive scaffolds by real-time monitoring of the local electrical activity within the constructs could revolutionize the response of neural and cardiac tissue models to drugs, and vital characteristics inside and outside vascular smooth muscle constructs.

References 270

  1. 1.

    Liu Y., Lim J., Teoh S.-H. Review: Development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:688-705.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.10.003

  2. 2.

    Farokhi M., Mottaghitalab F., Samani S., Shokrgozar M.A., Kundu S.C., Reis R.L., Fattahi Y., Kaplan D.L. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018;36:68-91.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.10.001

  3. 3.

    Nilforoushzadeh M.A., Zare M., Zarrintaj P., Alizadeh E., Taghiabadi E., Heidari-Kharaji M., Amirkhani M.A., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Engineering the niche for hair regeneration–a critical review. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2018;15:70-85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2018.08.012

  4. 4.

    Kargozar S., Mozafari M. Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Start small, think big. Mater. Today Proc. 2018;5:15492-15500.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.155

  5. 5.

    Zarrintaj P., Moghaddam A.S., Manouchehri S., Atoufi Z., Amiri A., Amirkhani M.A., Nilforoushzadeh M.A., Saeb M.R., Hamblin M.R., Mozafari M. Can regenerative medicine and nanotechnology combine to heal wounds? The search for the ideal wound dressing. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2403-2422.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2017-0173

  6. 6.

    Zarrintaj P., Jouyandeh M., Ganjali M.R., Hadavand B.S., Mozafari M., Sheiko S.S., Russell A.J., Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani M., Gutiérrez T.J., Saeb M.R. Thermo-sensitive polymers in medicine: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2019;117:402-403.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.024

  7. 7.

    Sefat F., Youseffi M., Khaghani S.A., Soon C.F., Javid F. Effect of transforming growth factor-β3 on mono and multilayer chondrocytes. Cytokine. 2016;83:118-126.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2016.04.008

  8. 8.

    Zarrintaj P., Bakhshandeh B., Saeb M.R., Sefat F., Rezaeian I., Ganjali M.R., Ramakrishna S., Mozafari M. Oligoaniline-based Conductive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018;72:16-34.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.042

  9. 9.

    Zarrintaj P., Ahmadi Z., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Poloxamer-based stimuli-responsive biomaterials. Mater. Today Proc. 2018;5:15516-15523.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.158

  10. 10.

    Farokhi M., Mottaghitalab F., Fatahi Y., Saeb M.R., Zarrintaj P., Kundu S.C., Khademhosseini A. Silk fibroin scaffolds for common cartilage injuries: Possibilities for future clinical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2019;115:251-267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.035

  11. 11.

    Fouladiha H., Marashi S.-A., Shokrgozar M.A., Farokhi M., Atashi A. Applications of a metabolic network model of mesenchymal stem cells for controlling cell proliferation and differentiation. Cytotechnology. 2018;70:331-338.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10616-017-0148-6

  12. 12.

    Rahmati M., Pennisi C.P., Mobasheri A., Mozafari M. Bioengineered Scaffolds for Stem Cell Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018;3:73-89.

    Not in our library10.1007/5584_2018_215

  13. 13.

    Touri M., Moztarzadeh F., Osman N.A.A., Dehghan M.M., Mozafari M. 3D-printed biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with an oxygen generating system for enhancing engineered tissue survival. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;84:236-242.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.037

  14. 14.

    Zarrintaj P., Manouchehri S., Ahmadi Z., Saeb M.R., Urbanska A.M., Kaplan D.L., Mozafari M. Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;187:66-84.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060

  15. 15.

    Kalantari E., Naghib S.M., Naimi-Jamal M.R., Aliahmadi A., Iravani N.J., Mozafari M. Nanostructured monticellite for tissue engineering applications-Part I: Microstructural and physicochemical characteristics. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:12731-12738.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.076

  16. 16.

    Naserzadeh P., Mortazavi S.A., Ashtari K., Salimi A., Farokhi M., Pourahmad J. Evaluation of the toxicity effects of silk fibroin on human lymphocytes and monocytes. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018;32:e22056.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbt.22056

  17. 17.

    Jazayeri M., Shokrgozar M.A., Haghighipour N., Bolouri B., Mirahmadi F., Farokhi M. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on gene expression of mesenchymal stem cells and repair of bone lesions. Cell J. 2017;19:34-44.

    Not in our library10.22074/cellj.2016.4870

  18. 18.

    Jazayeri M., Shokrgozar M.A., Haghighipour N., Mahdian R., Farrokhi M., Bonakdar S., Mirahmadi F., Abbariki T.N. Evaluation of mechanical and chemical stimulations on osteocalcin and Runx2 expression in mesenchymal stem cells. Mol. Cell Biomech. 2015;12:197-213.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Derakhshandeh M.R., Eshraghi M.J., Javaheri M., Khamseh S., Sari M.G., Zarrintaj P., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Diamond-like carbon-deposited films: A new class of biocorrosion protective coatings. Surf. Innov. 2018;6:266-276.

    Not in our library10.1680/jsuin.18.00002

  20. 20.

    Bassett C.A.L., Becker R.O. Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science. 1962;137:1063-1064.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.137.3535.1063

  21. 21.

    Prabhakaran M.P., Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Jin G., Ramakrishna S. Electrospun conducting polymer nanofibers and electrical stimulation of nerve stem cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011;112:501-507.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.07.010

  22. 22.

    Ning C., Zhou Z., Tan G., Zhu Y., Mao C. Electroactive polymers for tissue regeneration: Developments and perspectives. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018;81:144-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.001

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Memic A., Aldhahri M., Tamayol A., Mostafalu P., Abdel-Wahab M.S., Samandari M., Moghaddam K.M., Annabi N., Bencherif S.A., Khademhosseini A. Nanofibrous silver-coated polymeric scaffolds with tunable electrical properties. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:63.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano7030063

  25. 25.

    Wu Y., Wang L., Guo B., Shao Y., Ma P.X. Electroactive biodegradable polyurethane significantly enhanced Schwann cells myelin gene expression and neurotrophin secretion for peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016;87:18-31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.010

  26. 26.

    Zarrintaj P., Saeb M.R., Ramakrishna S., Mozafari M. Biomaterials Selection for Neuroprosthetics. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2018;6:99-109.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cobme.2018.05.003

  27. 27.

    Zarrintaj P., Ahmadi Z., Vahabi H., Ducos F., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Polyaniline in retrospect and prospect. Mater. Today Proc. 2018;5:15852-15860.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.084

  28. 28.

    Babanejad N., Nabid M.R., Farhadian A., Dorkoosh F., Zarrintaj P., Saeb M., Mozafari M. Sustained delivery of olanzapine from sunflower oil-based polyol-urethane nanoparticles synthesized through a cyclic carbonate ring-opening reaction. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2019.

    Not in our library10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5440

  29. 29.

    Guo B., Ma P.X. Conducting polymers for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:1764-1782.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00276

  30. 30.

    Guo B., Glavas L., Albertsson A.-C. Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013;38:1263-1286.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.003

  31. 31.

    Hiltunen M., Pelto J., Ellä V., Kellomäki M. Uniform and electrically conductive biopolymer-doped polypyrrole coating for fibrous PLA. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2016;104:1721-1729.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.33514

  32. 32.

    Jin G., Li K. The electrically conductive scaffold as the skeleton of stem cell niche in regenerative medicine. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2014;45:671-681.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.004

  33. 33.

    Collier J.H., Camp J.P., Hudson T.W., Schmidt C.E. Synthesis and characterization of polypyrrole–hyaluronic acid composite biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000;50:574-584.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000615)50:4<574::aid-jbm13>3.0.co;2-i

  34. 34.

    Breukers R., Gilmore K.J., Kita M., Wagner K., Higgins M., Moulton S., Clark G.M., Officer D., Kapsa R., Wallace G. Creating conductive structures for cell growth: Growth and alignment of myogenic cell types on polythiophenes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2010;95:256-268.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32822

  35. 35.

    Ferris C.J. Conducting bio-materials based on gellan gum hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2009;5:3430-3437.

    Not in our library10.1039/b909795c

  36. 36.

    You J.-O., Rafat M., Ye G.J., Auguste D.T. Nanoengineering the heart: Conductive scaffolds enhance connexin 43 expression. Nano Lett. 2011;11:3643-3648.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl201514a

  37. 37.

    Anand J., Palaniappan S., Sathyanarayana D. Conducting polyaniline blends and composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1998;23:993-1018.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6700(97)00040-3

  38. 38.

    Li M., Guo Y., Wei Y., MacDiarmid A.G., Lelkes P.I. Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2705-2715.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.037

  39. 39.

    Wong J.Y., Langer R., Ingber D.E. Electrically conducting polymers can noninvasively control the shape and growth of mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:3201-3204.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.8.3201

  40. 40.

    Cui H., Shao J., Wang Y., Zhang P., Chen X., Wei Y. PLA-PEG-PLA and Its Electroactive Tetraaniline Copolymer as Multi-interactive Injectable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:1904-1912.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm4002766

  41. 41.

    Huang K., Niu Y., Wang L.J., Liu Y., Chen J.S., Wang R.Z. pH-Induced Cross-Linking of Dopamine-Containing Block Copolymers with Fe3+ to Form Self-Healing Hydrogels. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012;569:11-14.

    Not in our library10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.569.11

  42. 42.

    Lu X., Zhang W., Wang C., Wen T.-C., Wei Y. One-dimensional conducting polymer nanocomposites: Synthesis, properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011;36:671-712.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.010

  43. 43.

    Balint R., Cassidy N.J., Cartmell S.H. Conductive polymers: Towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2341-2353.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.015

  44. 44.

    Williams R., Doherty P. A preliminary assessment of poly (pyrrole) in nerve guide studies. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1994;5:429-433.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00058978

  45. 45.

    Moroder P., Runge M.B., Wang H., Ruesink T., Lu L., Spinner R.J., Windebank A.J., Yaszemski M.J. Material properties and electrical stimulation regimens of polycaprolactone fumarate–polypyrrole scaffolds as potential conductive nerve conduits. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:944-953.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.013

  46. 46.

    Mozafari M., Vashaee D., Tayebi L., Mehraien M., Ebrahimi F. Electroconductive nanocomposite scaffolds: A new strategy into tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Nanocomposites—New Trends and Developments. 2012.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Derakhshandeh M.R., Eshraghi M.J., Hadavi M.M., Javaheri M., Khamseh S., Sari M.G., Zarrintaj P., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Diamond-like carbon thin films prepared by pulsed-DC PE-CVD for biomedical applications. Surf. Innov. 2018;6:167-175.

    Not in our library10.1680/jsuin.17.00069

  48. 48.

    Bendrea A.-D., Cianga L., Cianga I. Review paper: Progress in the field of conducting polymers for tissue engineering applications. J. Biomater. Appl. 2011;26:3-84.

    Not in our library10.1177/0885328211402704

  49. 49.

    Ateh D., Navsaria H., Vadgama P. Polypyrrole-based conducting polymers and interactions with biological tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2006;3:741-752.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2006.0141

  50. 50.

    Runge M.B., Dadsetan M., Baltrusaitis J., Knight A.M., Ruesink T., Lazcano E.A., Lu L., Windebank A.J., Yaszemski M.J. The development of electrically conductive polycaprolactone fumarate–polypyrrole composite materials for nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5916-5926.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.012

  51. 51.

    Moreno J.S., Panero S., Artico M., Filippini P. Synthesis and characterization of new electroactive polypyrrole–chondroitin sulphate A substrates. Bioelectrochemistry. 2008;72:3-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bioelechem.2007.11.002

  52. 52.

    Shi G., Rouabhia M., Wang Z., Dao L.H., Zhang Z. A novel electrically conductive and biodegradable composite made of polypyrrole nanoparticles and polylactide. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2477-2488.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.032

  53. 53.

    Bueno V.B., Takahashi S.H., Catalani L.H., de Torresi S.I.C., Petri D.F.S. Biocompatible xanthan/polypyrrole scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2015;52:121-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.023

  54. 54.

    Liu H., Wang R., Chu H.K., Sun D. Design and characterization of a conductive nanostructured polypyrrole-polycaprolactone coated magnesium/PLGA composite for tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2015;103:2966-2973.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35428

  55. 55.

    Deng Z., Guo Y., Ma P.X., Guo B. Rapid thermal responsive conductive hybrid cryogels with shape memory properties, photothermal properties and pressure dependent conductivity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;526:281-294.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.093

  56. 56.

    Saeb M.R., Zarrintaj P., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 10—Polyaniline/graphene-based nanocomposites. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;165-175.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Saeb M.R., Zarrintaj P., Khandelwal P., Chauhan N.P.S., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 2—Synthetic route of polyaniline (I): Conventional oxidative polymerization. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;17-41.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Zarrintaj P., Yazdi M.K., Jouyandeh M., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 7—PANI-based nanostructures. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;121-130.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Zarrintaj P., Khalili R., Vahabi H., Saeb M.R., Ganjali M.R., Mozafari M., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 8—Polyaniline/metal oxides nanocomposites. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;131-141.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Zarrintaj P., Yazdi M.K., Vahabi H., Moghadam P.N., Saeb M.R. Towards advanced flame retardant organic coatings: Expecting a new function from polyaniline. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;130:144-148.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.053

  61. 61.

    Ahmadi Z., Chauhan N.P.S., Zarrintaj P., Khiabani A.B., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 13—Experimental procedures for assessing electrical and thermal conductivity of polyaniline. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;227-258.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Zarrintaj P., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 5—Synthetic route of polyaniline (IV): Irradiation path. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;91-103.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Yazdi M.K., Saeidi H., Zarrintaj P., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 9—PANI-CNT nanocomposites. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;143-163.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    Li L., Ge J., Guo B., Ma P.X. In situ forming biodegradable electroactive hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2014;5:2880-2890.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3py01634j

  65. 65.

    Rahman N.A., Feisst V., Dickinson M.E., Malmström J., Dunbar P.R., Travas-Sejdic J. Functional polyaniline nanofibre mats for human adipose-derived stem cell proliferation and adhesion. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013;138:333-341.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.065

  66. 66.

    Zarrintaj P., Vahabi H., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M., Mozafari M., Chauhan N.P.S. Chapter 14—Application of polyaniline and its derivatives. Fundamentals and Emerging Applications of Polyaniline. 2019;259-272.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Zhao X., Li P., Guo B., Ma P.X. Antibacterial and conductive injectable hydrogels based on quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline/oxidized dextran for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:236-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.006

  68. 68.

    Gizdavic-Nikolaidis M., Ray S., Bennett J.R., Easteal A.J., Cooney R.P. Electrospun Functionalized Polyaniline Copolymer-Based Nanofibers with Potential Application in Tissue Engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2010;10:1424-1431.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201000237

  69. 69.

    Hafshejani T.M., Zamanian A., Venugopal J.R., Rezvani Z., Sefat F., Saeb M.R., Vahabi H., Zarrintaj P., Mozafari M. Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: A critical review on the current status of extended release formulations. J. Control. Release. 2017;262:317-328.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.041

  70. 70.

    McKeon-Fischer K., Freeman J. Addition of conductive elements to polymeric scaffolds for muscle tissue engineering. Nano Life. 2012;2:1230011.

    Not in our library10.1142/s1793984412300117

  71. 71.

    Baheiraei N., Yeganeh H., Ai J., Gharibi R., Azami M., Faghihi F. Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant activity of a novel electroactive and biodegradable polyurethane for cardiac tissue engineering application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2014;44:24-37.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.061

  72. 72.

    Park J., Choi J.H., Kim S., Jang I., Jeong S., Lee J.Y. Micropatterned conductive hydrogels as multifunctional muscle-mimicking biomaterials: Graphene-incorporated hydrogels directly patterned with femtosecond laser ablation. Acta Biomater. 2019.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.044

  73. 73.

    Guo B., Qu J., Zhao X., Zhang M. Degradable conductive self-healing hydrogels based on dextran-graft-tetraaniline and N-carboxyethyl chitosan as injectable carriers for myoblast cell therapy and muscle regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;84:180-193.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.008

  74. 74.

    Zhao X., Dong R., Guo B., Ma P.X. Dopamine-incorporated dual bioactive electroactive shape memory polyurethane elastomers with physiological shape recovery temperature, high stretchability, and enhanced C2C12 myogenic differentiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:29595-29611.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b10583

  75. 75.

    Jeong S.I., Jun I.D., Choi M.J., Nho Y.C., Lee Y.M., Shin H. Development of Electroactive and Elastic Nanofibers that contain Polyaniline and Poly (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) for the Control of Cell Adhesion. Macromol. Biosci. 2008;8:627-637.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200800005

  76. 76.

    Bouten C.V.C., Dankers P.Y.W., Driessen-Mol A., Pedron S., Brizard A.M.A., Baaijens F.P.T. Substrates for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011;63:221-241.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.007

  77. 77.

    Guo B., Finne-Wistrand A., Albertsson A.-C. Facile synthesis of degradable and electrically conductive polysaccharide hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:2601-2609.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm200389t

  78. 78.

    Guo B., Finne-Wistrand A., Albertsson A.-C. Electroactive Hydrophilic Polylactide Surface by Covalent Modification with Tetraaniline. Macromolecules. 2012;45:652-659.

    Not in our library10.1021/ma202508h

  79. 79.

    Zhang X., Qi H., Wang S., Feng L., Ji Y., Tao L., Li S., Wei Y. Cellular responses of aniline oligomers: A preliminary study. Toxicol. Res. 2012;1:201-205.

    Not in our library10.1039/c2tx20035j

  80. 80.

    Qi H., Liu M., Xu L., Feng L., Tao L., Ji Y., Zhang X., Wei Y. Biocompatibility evaluation of aniline oligomers with different end-functional groups. Toxicol. Res. 2013;2:427-433.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3tx50060h

  81. 81.

    Xu C., Huang Y., Yepez G., Wei Z., Liu F., Bugarin A., Tang L., Hong Y. Development of dopant-free conductive bioelastomers. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:34451.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep34451

  82. 82.

    Ma X., Ge J., Li Y., Guo B., Ma P.X. Nanofibrous electroactive scaffolds from a chitosan-grafted-aniline tetramer by electrospinning for tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2014;4:13652-13661.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ra00083h

  83. 83.

    Kim H., Jeong S.-M., Park J.-W. Electrical switching between vesicles and micelles via redox-responsive self-assembly of amphiphilic rod− coils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:5206-5209.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja200297j

  84. 84.

    Zhou L., Yu M., Chen X., Nie S., Lai W.Y., Su W., Cui Z., Huang W. Ito-Free Flexible Electronics: Screen-Printed Poly (3, 4-Ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly (Styrenesulfonate) Grids as ITO-Free Anodes for Flexible Organic Light-Emitting Diodes (Adv. Funct. Mater. 11/2018). Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1870072.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201870072

  85. 85.

    Povlich L.K., Feldman K.E., Shim B.S., Martin D.C., Ducheyne P. 1.130-Electroactive Polymeric Biomaterials. Comprehensive Biomaterials. 2011;547-561.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Niu X., Rouabhia M., Chiffot N., King M.W., Zhang Z. An electrically conductive 3D scaffold based on a nonwoven web of poly (l-lactic acid) and conductive poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2015;103:2635-2644.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35408

  87. 87.

    Abidian M.R., Corey J.M., Kipke D.R., Martin D.C. Conducting-polymer nanotubes improve electrical properties, mechanical adhesion, neural attachment, and neurite outgrowth of neural electrodes. Small. 2010;6:421-429.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.200901868

  88. 88.

    Malliaras G., Abidian M.R. Organic bioelectronic materials and devices. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:7492.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201504783

  89. 89.

    Mehmood U., Al-Ahmed A., Hussein I.A. Review on recent advances in polythiophene based photovoltaic devices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016;57:550-561.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.177

  90. 90.

    Schopf G., Kossmehl G. Polythiophenes-Electrically Conductive Polymers. 1997.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Iyoda M., Shimizu H. Multifunctional π-expanded oligothiophene macrocycles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:6411-6424.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5cs00388a

  92. 92.

    Hussain S.T., Abbas F., Kausar A., Khan M.R. New polyaniline/polypyrrole/polythiophene and functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube-based nanocomposites: Layer-by-layer in situ polymerization. High Perform. Polym. 2013;25:70-78.

    Not in our library10.1177/0954008312456048

  93. 93.

    Bitounis D., Ali-Boucetta H., Hong B.H., Min D.H., Kostarelos K. Prospects and challenges of graphene in biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:2258-2268.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201203700

  94. 94.

    Goodarzi S., Da Ros T., Conde J., Sefat F., Mozafari M. Fullerene: Biomedical engineers get to revisit an old friend. Mater. Today. 2017;20:460-480.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mattod.2017.03.017

  95. 95.

    Goenka S., Sant V., Sant S. Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Control. Release. 2014;173:75-88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.10.017

  96. 96.

    Bhattacharyya S., Guillot S., Dabboue H., Tranchant J.-F., Salvetat J.-P. Carbon nanotubes as structural nanofibers for hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:505-509.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm7009976

  97. 97.

    Lau C., Cooney M.J., Atanassov P. Conductive macroporous composite chitosan− carbon nanotube scaffolds. Langmuir. 2008;24:7004-7010.

    Not in our library10.1021/la8005597

  98. 98.

    Alasv N., Mozafari M. Graphene-Proceed with Caution: What We Know, what We don’t. J. Clin. Toxicol. 2015;5:E122.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    Li Y., Samad Y.A., Polychronopoulou K., Alhassan S.M., Liao K. Highly Electrically Conductive Nanocomposites Based on PolymerInfused Graphene Sponges. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4652.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep04652

  100. 100.

    Menaa F., Abdelghani A., Menaa B. Graphene nanomaterials as biocompatible and conductive scaffolds for stem cells: Impact for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015;9:1321-1338.

    Not in our library10.1002/term.1910

  101. 101.

    Song H.S., Kwon O.S., Kim J.-H., Conde J., Artzi N. 3D hydrogel scaffold doped with 2D graphene materials for biosensors and bioelectronics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:187-200.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.045

  102. 102.

    Tran P.A., Zhang L., Webster T.J. Carbon nanofibers and carbon nanotubes in regenerative medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009;61:1097-1114.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.010

  103. 103.

    Edwards S.L., Werkmeister J.A., Ramshaw J.A. Carbon nanotubes in scaffolds for tissue engineering. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2009;6:499-505.

    Not in our library10.1586/erd.09.29

  104. 104.

    Mozafari M. The Critical Impact of Controlled Drug Delivery in the Future of Tissue Engineering. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2014;28.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    Hopley E.L., Salmasi S., Kalaskar D.M., Seifalian A.M. Carbon nanotubes leading the way forward in new generation 3D tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32:1000-1014.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.05.003

  106. 106.

    MacDonald R.A., Voge C.M., Kariolis M., Stegemann J.P. Carbon nanotubes increase the electrical conductivity of fibroblast-seeded collagen hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1583-1592.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.005

  107. 107.

    Upadhyayula V.K.K., Gadhamshetty V. Appreciating the role of carbon nanotube composites in preventing biofouling and promoting biofilms on material surfaces in environmental engineering: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010;28:802-816.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.06.006

  108. 108.

    Edwards S.L., Church J.S., Werkmeister J.A., Ramshaw J.A. Tubular micro-scale multiwalled carbon nanotube-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1725-1731.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.031

  109. 109.

    Cardiel J.J., Zhao Y., Kim J.-H., Chung J.-H., Shen A.Q. Electro-conductive porous scaffold with single-walled carbon nanotubes in wormlike micellar networks. Carbon. 2014;80:203-212.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.057

  110. 110.

    Abarrategi A., Gutiérrez M.C., Moreno-Vicente C., Hortigüela M.J., Ramos V., López-Lacomba J.L., Ferrer M.L., del Monte F. Multiwall carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering purposes. Biomaterials. 2008;29:94-102.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.021

  111. 111.

    Correa-Duarte M.A., Wagner N., Rojas-Chapana J., Morsczeck C., Thie M., Giersig M. Fabrication and biocompatibility of carbon nanotube-based 3D networks as scaffolds for cell seeding and growth. Nano Lett. 2004;4:2233-2236.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl048574f

  112. 112.

    Liao H., Qi R., Shen M., Cao X., Guo R., Zhang Y., Shi X. Improved cellular response on multiwalled carbon nanotube-incorporated electrospun polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2011;84:528-535.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.010

  113. 113.

    Mackle J.N., Blond D.J.P., Mooney E., McDonnell C., Blau W.J., Shaw G., Barry F.P., Murphy J.M., Barron V. In vitro Characterization of an Electroactive Carbon-Nanotube-Based Nanofiber Scaffold for Tissue Engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2011;11:1272-1282.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201100029

  114. 114.

    Vardharajula S., Ali S.Z., Tiwari P.M., Eroğlu E., Vig K., Dennis V.A., Singh S.R. Functionalized carbon nanotubes: Biomedical applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012;7:5361.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s35832

  115. 115.

    Serrano M.C., Gutiérrez M.C., del Monte F. Role of polymers in the design of 3D carbon nanotube-based scaffolds for biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014;39:1448-1471.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.004

  116. 116.

    Hermant M.-C., van der Schoot P., Klumperman B., Koning C.E. Probing the Cooperative Nature of the Conductive Components in Polystyrene/Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly (styrene sulfonate)− Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Composites. Acs Nano. 2010;4:2242-2248.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn901643h

  117. 117.

    Garipcan B., Odabas S., Demirel G., Burger J., Nonnenmann S.S., Coster M.T., Gallo E.M., Nabet B., Spanier J.E., Piskin E. In Vitro Biocompatibility of n-Type and Undoped Silicon Nanowires. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2011;13:B3-B9.

    Not in our library10.1002/adem.200980045

  118. 118.

    Tölli M.A., Ferreira M.P., Kinnunen S.M., Rysä J., Mäkilä E.M., Szabó Z., Serpi R.E., Ohukainen P.J., Välimäki M.J., Correia A.M. In vivo biocompatibility of porous silicon biomaterials for drug delivery to the heart. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8394-8405.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.078

  119. 119.

    Tan Y., Richards D., Xu R., Stewart-Clark S., Mani S.K., Borg T.K., Menick D.R., Tian B., Mei Y. Silicon Nanowire-Induced Maturation of Cardiomyocytes Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Nano Lett. 2015;15:2765-2772.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl502227a

  120. 120.

    Jiang K., Fan D., Belabassi Y., Akkaraju G., Montchamp J.-L., Coffer J.L. Medicinal surface modification of silicon nanowires: Impact on calcification and stromal cell proliferation. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2008;1:266-269.

    Not in our library10.1021/am800219r

  121. 121.
  122. 122.

    Sperling R.A., Parak W. Surface modification, functionalization and bioconjugation of colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2010;368:1333-1383.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2009.0273

  123. 123.

    Ravichandran R., Sridhar R., Venugopal J.R., Sundarrajan S., Mukherjee S., Ramakrishna S. Gold Nanoparticle Loaded Hybrid Nanofibers for Cardiogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells for Infarcted Myocardium Regeneration. Macromol. Biosci. 2014;14:515-525.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201300407

  124. 124.

    McKeon-Fischer K.D., Freeman J.W. Characterization of electrospun poly(L-lactide) and gold nanoparticle composite scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011;5:560-568.

    Not in our library10.1002/term.348

  125. 125.

    Sperling R.A., Gil P.R., Zhang F., Zanella M., Parak W.J. Biological applications of gold nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:1896-1908.

    Not in our library10.1039/b712170a

  126. 126.

    Cohen-Karni T., Jeong K.J., Tsui J.H., Reznor G., Mustata M., Wanunu M., Graham A., Marks C., Bell D.C., Langer R. Nanocomposite gold-silk nanofibers. Nano Lett. 2012;12:5403-5406.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl302810c

  127. 127.

    Conde J., Oliva N., Artzi N. Implantable hydrogel embedded dark-gold nanoswitch as a theranostic probe to sense and overcome cancer multidrug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E1278-E1287.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1421229112

  128. 128.

    Conde J., Bao C., Cui D., Baptista P.V., Tian F. Antibody–drug gold nanoantennas with Raman spectroscopic fingerprints for in vivo tumour theranostics. J. Control. Release. 2014;183:87-93.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.045

  129. 129.
  130. 130.

    Conde J., Oliva N., Zhang Y., Artzi N. Local triple-combination therapy results in tumour regression and prevents recurrence in a colon cancer model. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:1128-1138.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat4707

  131. 131.

    Riley P. Melanin. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997;29:1235-1239.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1357-2725(97)00013-7

  132. 132.

    Kai D., Prabhakaran M.P., Jin G., Ramakrishna S. Biocompatibility evaluation of electrically conductive nanofibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2013;1:2305-2314.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3tb00151b

  133. 133.

    Bernsmann F., Frisch B., Ringwald C., Ball V. Protein adsorption on dopamine–melanin films: Role of electrostatic interactions inferred from ζ-potential measurements versus chemisorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;344:54-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.052

  134. 134.

    Bernsmann F., Ersen O., Voegel J.C., Jan E., Kotov N.A., Ball V. Melanin-Containing Films: Growth from Dopamine Solutions versus Layer-by-Layer Deposition. ChemPhysChem. 2010;11:3299-3305.

    Not in our library10.1002/cphc.201000384

  135. 135.

    Balachandran U., Odekirk B., Eror N.G. Electrical conductivity in calcium titanate. J. Solid State Chem. 1982;41:185-194.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-4596(82)90201-8

  136. 136.

    Figueiredo F.M., Kharton V.V., Waerenborgh J.C., Viskup A.P., Naumovich E.N., Frade J.R. Influence of Microstructure on the Electrical Properties of Iron-Substituted Calcium Titanate Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004;87:2252-2261.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb07501.x

  137. 137.

    Thrivikraman G., Mallik P.K., Basu B. Substrate conductivity dependent modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7073-7085.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.076

  138. 138.

    Farokhi M., Mottaghitalab F., Shokrgozar M.A., Kaplan D.L., Kim H.-W., Kundu S.C. Prospects of peripheral nerve tissue engineering using nerve guide conduits based on silk fibroin protein and other biopolymers. Int. Mater. Rev. 2017;62:367-391.

    Not in our library10.1080/09506608.2016.1252551

  139. 139.
  140. 140.

    Ahn H.-S., Hwang J.-Y., Kim M.S., Lee J.-Y., Kim J.-W., Kim H.-S., Shin U.S., Knowles J.C., Kim H.-W., Hyun J.K. Carbon-nanotube-interfaced glass fiber scaffold for regeneration of transected sciatic nerve. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:324-334.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.026

  141. 141.

    Huang J., Hu X., Lu L., Ye Z., Zhang Q., Luo Z. Electrical regulation of Schwann cells using conductive polypyrrole/chitosan polymers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2010;93:164-174.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32511

  142. 142.

    Qi F., Wang Y., Ma T., Zhu S., Zeng W., Hu X., Liu Z., Huang J., Luo Z. Electrical regulation of olfactory ensheathing using conductive polypyrrole/chitosan polymers. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1799-1809.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.042

  143. 143.

    Lee J.Y., Bashur C.A., Goldstein A.S., Schmidt C.E. Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4325-4335.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.042

  144. 144.

    Thrivikraman G., Madras G., Basu B. Intermittent electrical stimuli for guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell lineage commitment towards neural-like cells on electroconductive substrates. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6219-6235.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.018

  145. 145.

    Wu Y., Wang L., Hu T., Ma P.X., Guo B. Conductive micropatterned polyurethane films as tissue engineering scaffolds for Schwann cells and PC12 cells. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;518:252-262.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.036

  146. 146.

    Guarino V., Alvarez-Perez M.A., Borriello A., Napolitano T., Ambrosio L. Conductive PANi/PEGDA macroporous hydrogels for nerve regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2013;2:218-227.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201200152

  147. 147.

    Bagher Z., Atoufi Z., Alizadeh R., Farhadi M., Zarrintaj P., Moroni L., Setayeshmehr M., Komeili A., Kamrava S.K. Conductive hydrogel based on chitosan-aniline pentamer/gelatin/agarose significantly promoted motor neuron-like cells differentiation of human olfactory ecto-mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;101:243-253.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.068

  148. 148.

    Manouchehri S., Bagheri B., Rad S.H., Nezhad M.N., Kim Y.C., Park O.O., Farokhi M., Jouyandeh M., Ganjali M.R., Yazdi M.K. Electroactive bio-epoxy incorporated chitosan-oligoaniline as an advanced hydrogel coating for neural interfaces. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;131:389-396.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.03.022

  149. 149.

    Zarrintaj P., Bakhshandeh B., Rezaeian I., Heshmatian B., Ganjali M.R. A novel electroactive agarose-aniline pentamer platform as a potential candidate for neural tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17187.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-17486-9

  150. 150.

    Zarrintaj P., Rezaeian I., Bakhshandeh B., Heshmatian B., Ganjali M.R. Bio-conductive scaffold based on agarose-polyaniline for tissue engineering. J. Skin Stem Cell. 2017;4.

    Not in our library10.5812/jssc.67394

  151. 151.

    Zarrintaj P., Urbanska A.M., Gholizadeh S.S., Goodarzi V., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. A facile route to the synthesis of anilinic electroactive colloidal hydrogels for neural tissue engineering applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;516:57-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.044

  152. 152.

    Atoufi Z., Zarrintaj P., Motlagh G.H., Amiri A., Bagher Z., Kamrava S.K. A novel bio electro active alginate-aniline tetramer/agarose scaffold for tissue engineering: Synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2017;28:1617-1638.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2017.1340044

  153. 153.

    Alizadeh R., Zarrintaj P., Kamrava S.K., Bagher Z., Farhadi M., Heidari F., Komeili A., Gutiérrez T.J., Saeb M.R. Conductive agarose/alginate/chitosan-based hydrogels for neural disorder therapy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019;115161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115161

  154. 154.

    Mattson M.P., Haddon R.C., Rao A.M. Molecular functionalization of carbon nanotubes and use as substrates for neuronal growth. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2000;14:175-182.

    Not in our library10.1385/jmn:14:3:175

  155. 155.

    Kabiri M., Soleimani M., Shabani I., Futrega K., Ghaemi N., Ahvaz H.H., Elahi E., Doran M.R. Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells on conductive nanofiber scaffolds. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012;34:1357-1365.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10529-012-0889-4

  156. 156.

    Li N., Zhang Q., Gao S., Song Q., Huang R., Wang L., Liu L., Dai J., Tang M., Cheng G. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1604.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep01604

  157. 157.

    Lee J.Y., Lee J.-W., Schmidt C.E. Neuroactive conducting scaffolds: Nerve growth factor conjugation on active ester-functionalized polypyrrole. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2008;6.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2008.0403

  158. 158.

    Huang L., Zhuang X., Hu J., Lang L., Zhang P., Wang Y., Chen X., Wei Y., Jing X. Synthesis of biodegradable and electroactive multiblock polylactide and aniline pentamer copolymer for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:850-858.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm7011828

  159. 159.

    Richardson-Burns S.M., Hendricks J.L., Foster B., Povlich L.K., Kim D.-H., Martin D.C. Polymerization of the conducting polymer poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)(PEDOT) around living neural cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1539-1552.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.026

  160. 160.

    Stewart E., Kobayashi N.R., Higgins M.J., Quigley A.F., Jamali S., Moulton S.E., Kapsa R.M., Wallace G.G., Crook J.M. Electrical stimulation using conductive polymer polypyrrole promotes differentiation of human neural stem cells: A biocompatible platform for translational neural tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2014;21:385-393.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0338

  161. 161.

    Xie J., MacEwan M.R., Willerth S.M., Li X., Moran D.W., Sakiyama-Elbert S.E., Xia Y. Conductive core–sheath nanofibers and their potential application in neural tissue engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:2312-2318.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.200801904

  162. 162.

    Cui Z., Ni N.C., Wu J., Du G.Q., He S., Yau T.M., Weisel R.D., Sung H.W., Li R.K. Polypyrrole-chitosan conductive biomaterial synchronizes cardiomyocyte contraction and improves myocardial electrical impulse propagation. Theranostics. 2018;8:2752-2764.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.22599

  163. 163.
  164. 164.

    Xu H., Holzwarth J.M., Yan Y., Xu P., Zheng H., Yin Y., Li S., Ma P.X. Conductive PPY/PDLLA conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35:225-235.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.002

  165. 165.

    Hardy J.G., Khaing Z.Z., Xin S., Tien L.W., Ghezzi C.E., Mouser D.J., Sukhavasi R.C., Preda R.C., Gil E.S., Kaplan D.L. Into the groove: Instructive silk-polypyrrole films with topographical guidance cues direct DRG neurite outgrowth. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2015;26:1327-1342.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2015.1090181

  166. 166.

    Abidian M.R., Daneshvar E.D., Egeland B.M., Kipke D.R., Cederna P.S., Urbanchek M.G. Hybrid conducting polymer–hydrogel conduits for axonal growth and neural tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012;1:762-767.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201200182

  167. 167.

    Zeng J., Huang Z., Yin G., Qin J., Chen X., Gu J. Fabrication of conductive NGF-conjugated polypyrrole–poly (l-lactic acid) fibers and their effect on neurite outgrowth. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2013;110:450-457.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.012

  168. 168.

    Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Prabhakaran M.P., Morshed M., Nasr-Esfahani M.H., Baharvand H., Kiani S., Al-Deyab S.S., Ramakrishna S. Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011;5:e17-e35.

    Not in our library10.1002/term.383

  169. 169.

    Chiono V., Tonda-Turo C. Trends in the design of nerve guidance channels in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Prog. Neurobiol. 2015;131:87-104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.001

  170. 170.

    Sudwilai T., Ng J.J., Boonkrai C., Israsena N., Chuangchote S., Supaphol P. Polypyrrole-coated electrospun poly (lactic acid) fibrous scaffold: Effects of coating on electrical conductivity and neural cell growth. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2014;25:1240-1252.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2014.926578

  171. 171.

    Lee W., Parpura V. Carbon nanotubes as substrates/scaffolds for neural cell growth. Prog. Brain Res. 2009;180:110-125.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6123(08)80006-4

  172. 172.

    Zhou K., Thouas G.A., Bernard C.C., Nisbet D.R., Finkelstein D.I., Li D., Forsythe J.S. Method to impart electro-and biofunctionality to neural scaffolds using graphene–polyelectrolyte multilayers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012;4:4524-4531.

    Not in our library10.1021/am3007565

  173. 173.

    Song J., Gao H., Zhu G., Cao X., Shi X., Wang Y. The preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/graphene oxide biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds and their application for directing cell behaviors. Carbon. 2015;95:1039-1050.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.011

  174. 174.

    Ribeiro J., Pereira T., Caseiro A.R., Armada-da-Silva P., Pires I., Prada J., Amorim I., Amado S., França M., Gonçalves C. Evaluation of biodegradable electric conductive tube-guides and mesenchymal stem cells. World J. Stem Cells. 2015;7:956.

    Not in our library10.4252/wjsc.v7.i6.956

  175. 175.

    Tavangarian F., Li Y. Carbon nanostructures as nerve scaffolds for repairing large gaps in severed nerves. Ceram. Int. 2012;38:6075-6090.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.038

  176. 176.

    Fabbro A., Sucapane A., Toma F.M., Calura E., Rizzetto L., Carrieri C., Roncaglia P., Martinelli V., Scaini D., Masten L. Adhesion to carbon nanotube conductive scaffolds forces action-potential appearance in immature rat spinal neurons. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73621.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0073621

  177. 177.

    Kabiri M., Oraee-Yazdani S., Shafiee A., Hanaee-Ahvaz H., Dodel M., Vaseei M., Soleimani M. Neuroregenerative effects of olfactory ensheathing cells transplanted in a multi-layered conductive nanofibrous conduit in peripheral nerve repair in rats. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015;22:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12929-015-0144-0

  178. 178.

    Feng Z.Q., Wang T., Zhao B., Li J., Jin L. Soft Graphene Nanofibers Designed for the Acceleration of Nerve Growth and Development. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:6462-6468.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201503319

  179. 179.

    Behan B.L., DeWitt D.G., Bogdanowicz D.R., Koppes A.N., Bale S.S., Thompson D.M. Single-walled carbon nanotubes alter Schwann cell behavior differentially within 2D and 3D environments. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2011;96:46-57.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.32939

  180. 180.

    Tosun Z., McFetridge P. A composite SWNT–collagen matrix: Characterization and preliminary assessment as a conductive peripheral nerve regeneration matrix. J. Neural Eng. 2010;7:066002.

    Not in our library10.1088/1741-2560/7/6/066002

  181. 181.
  182. 182.

    Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Prabhakaran M.P., Morshed M., Nasr-Esfahani M.H., Ramakrishna S. Electrical stimulation of nerve cells using conductive nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2009;15:3605-3619.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0689

  183. 183.

    Bhang S.H., Jeong S.I., Lee T.J., Jun I., Lee Y.B., Kim B.S., Shin H. Electroactive Electrospun Polyaniline/Poly [(L-lactide)-co-(ε-caprolactone)] Fibers for Control of Neural Cell Function. Macromol. Biosci. 2012;12:402-411.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201100333

  184. 184.

    Guo B., Sun Y., Finne-Wistrand A., Mustafa K., Albertsson A.-C. Electroactive porous tubular scaffolds with degradability and non-cytotoxicity for neural tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:144-153.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.027

  185. 185.

    Sirivisoot S., Pareta R., Harrison B.S. Protocol and cell responses in three-dimensional conductive collagen gel scaffolds with conductive polymer nanofibres for tissue regeneration. Interface Focus. 2014;4:20130050.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsfs.2013.0050

  186. 186.

    Baniasadi H., SA A.R., Mashayekhan S. Fabrication and characterization of conductive chitosan/gelatin-based scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015;74:360-366.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.12.014

  187. 187.

    Urbanchek M., Shim B., Baghmanli Z., Wei B., Schroeder K., Langhals N., Miriani R., Egeland B., Kipke D., Martin D. Conduction properties of decellularized nerve biomaterials. Proceedings of the 26th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference SBEC 2010. 430-433.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-14998-6_109

  188. 188.

    Meng X., Stout D.A., Sun L., Beingessner R.L., Fenniri H., Webster T.J. Novel injectable biomimetic hydrogels with carbon nanofibers and self assembled rosette nanotubes for myocardial applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2013;101:1095-1102.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.34400

  189. 189.

    Chen Q.-Z., Harding S.E., Ali N.N., Lyon A.R., Boccaccini A.R. Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: Ten years of research survey. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 2008;59:1-37.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mser.2007.08.001

  190. 190.

    Stout D.A., Basu B., Webster T.J. Poly (lactic–co-glycolic acid): Carbon nanofiber composites for myocardial tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3101-3112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.028

  191. 191.

    Zia S., Mozafari M., Natasha G., Tan A., Cui Z., Seifalian A.M. Hearts beating through decellularized scaffolds: Whole-organ engineering for cardiac regeneration and transplantation. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015;1-11.

    Not in our library10.3109/07388551.2015.1007495

  192. 192.

    Kai D., Prabhakaran M.P., Jin G., Ramakrishna S. Polypyrrole-contained electrospun conductive nanofibrous membranes for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2011;99:376-385.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.33200

  193. 193.

    Mukherjee S., Venugopal J.R., Ravichandran R., Ramakrishna S., Raghunath M. Multimodal biomaterial strategies for regeneration of infarcted myocardium. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:8819-8831.

    Not in our library10.1039/c0jm00805b

  194. 194.

    Moura R.M., de Queiroz A.A.A. Dendronized polyaniline nanotubes for cardiac tissue engineering. Artif. Organs. 2011;35:471-477.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01257.x

  195. 195.

    Sepantafar M., Maheronnaghsh R., Mohammadi H., Rajabi-Zeleti S., Annabi N., Aghdami N., Baharvand H. Stem cells and injectable hydrogels: Synergistic therapeutics in myocardial repair. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016;34:362-379.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.003

  196. 196.

    Kharaziha M., Shin S.R., Nikkhah M., Topkaya S.N., Masoumi N., Annabi N., Dokmeci M.R., Khademhosseini A. Tough and flexible CNT–polymeric hybrid scaffolds for engineering cardiac constructs. Biomaterials. 2014;35:7346-7354.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.014

  197. 197.

    Gálvez-Montón C., Prat-Vidal C., Roura S., Soler-Botija C., Bayes-Genis A. Cardiac tissue engineering and the bioartificial heart. Rev. Española De Cardiol. 2013;66:391-399.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.recesp.2012.11.013

  198. 198.

    Tandon V., Zhang B., Radisic M., Murthy S.K. Generation of tissue constructs for cardiovascular regenerative medicine: From cell procurement to scaffold design. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:722-735.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.08.006

  199. 199.

    Shin S.R., Jung S.M., Zalabany M., Kim K., Zorlutuna P., Kim S.B., Nikkhah M., Khabiry M., Azize M., Kong J. Carbon-nanotube-embedded hydrogel sheets for engineering cardiac constructs and bioactuators. ACS Nano. 2013;7:2369-2380.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn305559j

  200. 200.

    Wu Y., Wang L., Guo B., Ma P.X. Interwoven aligned conductive nanofiber yarn/hydrogel composite scaffolds for engineered 3D cardiac anisotropy. ACS Nano. 2017;11:5646-5659.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b01062

  201. 201.

    Spearman B.S., Hodge A.J., Porter J.L., Hardy J.G., Davis Z.D., Xu T., Zhang X., Schmidt C.E., Hamilton M.C., Lipke E.A. Conductive interpenetrating networks of polypyrrole and polycaprolactone encourage electrophysiological development of cardiac cells. Acta Biomater. 2015;28:109-120.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.025

  202. 202.

    Liang S., Zhang Y., Wang H., Xu Z., Chen J., Bao R., Tan B., Cui Y., Fan G., Wang W. Paintable and Rapidly Bondable Conductive Hydrogels as Therapeutic Cardiac Patches. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1704235.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201704235

  203. 203.

    Borriello A., Guarino V., Schiavo L., Alvarez-Perez M., Ambrosio L. Optimizing PANi doped electroactive substrates as patches for the regeneration of cardiac muscle. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011;22:1053-1062.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-011-4259-x

  204. 204.

    Crowder S.W., Liang Y., Rath R., Park A.M., Maltais S., Pintauro P.N., Hofmeister W., Lim C.C., Wang X., Sung H.-J. Poly (ε-caprolactone)-carbon nanotube composite scaffolds for enhanced cardiac differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1763-1776.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm.12.204

  205. 205.

    Martinelli V., Cellot G., Toma F.M., Long C.S., Caldwell J.H., Zentilin L., Giacca M., Turco A., Prato M., Ballerini L. Carbon nanotubes promote growth and spontaneous electrical activity in cultured cardiac myocytes. Nano Lett. 2012;12:1831-1838.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl204064s

  206. 206.

    Martinelli V., Cellot G., Toma F.M., Long C.S., Caldwell J.H., Zentilin L., Giacca M., Turco A., Prato M., Ballerini L. Carbon nanotubes instruct physiological growth and functionally mature syncytia: Nongenetic engineering of cardiac myocytes. ACS Nano. 2013;7:5746-5756.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn4002193

  207. 207.

    Li X., Zhou J., Liu Z., Chen J., Lü S., Sun H., Li J., Lin Q., Yang B., Duan C. A PNIPAAm-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing SWCNTs for stem cell transplantation in myocardial repair. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5679-5688.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.067

  208. 208.

    Stout D.A., Raimondo E., Marostica G., Webster T.J. Growth characteristics of different heart cells on novel nanopatch substrate during electrical stimulation. Bio-Med Mater. Eng. 2014;24:2101-2107.

    Not in our library10.3233/bme-141020

  209. 209.

    Hsiao C.-W., Bai M.-Y., Chang Y., Chung M.-F., Lee T.-Y., Wu C.-T., Maiti B., Liao Z.-X., Li R.-K., Sung H.-W. Electrical coupling of isolated cardiomyocyte clusters grown on aligned conductive nanofibrous meshes for their synchronized beating. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1063-1072.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.065

  210. 210.

    Sun H., Lü S., Jiang X.-X., Li X., Li H., Lin Q., Mou Y., Zhao Y., Han Y., Zhou J., et al. Carbon nanotubes enhance intercalated disc assembly in cardiac myocytes via the β1-integrin-mediated signaling pathway. Biomaterials. 2015;55:84-95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.030

  211. 211.

    Dvir T., Timko B.P., Brigham M.D., Naik S.R., Karajanagi S.S., Levy O., Jin H., Parker K.K., Langer R., Kohane D.S. Nanowired three-dimensional cardiac patches. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:720-725.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2011.160

  212. 212.

    Zhou J., Chen J., Sun H., Qiu X., Mou Y., Liu Z., Zhao Y., Li X., Han Y., Duan C. Engineering the heart: Evaluation of conductive nanomaterials for improving implant integration and cardiac function. Sci. Rep. 2014;4.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep03733

  213. 213.

    Noorman M., van der Heyden M.A., van Veen T.A., Cox M.G., Hauer R.N., de Bakker J.M., van Rijen H.V. Cardiac cell–cell junctions in health and disease: Electrical versus mechanical coupling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009;47:23-31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.03.016

  214. 214.

    Yazdanpanah A., Amoabediny G., Shariatpanahi P., Nourmohammadi J., Tahmasbi M., Mozafari M. Synthesis and Characterization of Polylactic Acid Tubular Scaffolds with Improved Mechanical Properties for Vascular Tissue Engineering. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2014;28:99-105.

    Not in our library

  215. 215.

    Rowlands A.S., Cooper-White J.J. Directing phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells using electrically stimulated conducting polymer. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4510-4520.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.052

  216. 216.

    Mihardja S.S., Sievers R.E., Lee R.J. The effect of polypyrrole on arteriogenesis in an acute rat infarct model. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4205-4210.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.021

  217. 217.

    Lee J.-W., Serna F., Schmidt C.E. Carboxy-endcapped conductive polypyrrole: Biomimetic conducting polymer for cell scaffolds and electrodes. Langmuir. 2006;22:9816-9819.

    Not in our library10.1021/la062129d

  218. 218.

    Lee J.-W. Porous-structured Conductive Polypyrrole Cell Scaffolds. Notes. 2014;35:293.

    Not in our library10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.1.293

  219. 219.

    Bidez P.R., Li S., MacDiarmid A.G., Venancio E.C., Wei Y., Lelkes P.I. Polyaniline, an electroactive polymer, supports adhesion and proliferation of cardiac myoblasts. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2006;17:199-212.

    Not in our library10.1163/156856206774879180

  220. 220.

    Qazi T.H., Rai R., Dippold D., Roether J.E., Schubert D.W., Rosellini E., Barbani N., Boccaccini A.R. Development and characterization of novel electrically conductive PANI–PGS composites for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2434-2445.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.023

  221. 221.

    Baheiraei N., Yeganeh H., Ai J., Gharibi R., Ebrahimi-Barough S., Azami M., Vahdat S., Baharvand H. Preparation of a porous conductive scaffold from aniline pentamer-modified polyurethane/PCL blend for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2015;103:3179-3187.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35447

  222. 222.

    Stout D.A., Yoo J., Webster T.J. Poly Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid Carbon Nanofiber Composite for Enhancing Cardiomyocyte Function. MRS Online Proc. Libr. Arch. 2011;mrsf10-1316-qq1306-1333.

    Not in our library10.1557/opl.2011.663

  223. 223.

    Han Z., Kong H., Meng J., Wang C., Xie S., Xu H. Electrospun aligned nanofibrous scaffold of carbon nanotubes-polyurethane composite for endothelial cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009;9:1400-1402.

    Not in our library10.1166/jnn.2009.c165

  224. 224.

    Mooney E., Mackle J.N., Blond D.J.P., O’Cearbhaill E., Shaw G., Blau W.J., Barry F.P., Barron V., Murphy J.M. The electrical stimulation of carbon nanotubes to provide a cardiomimetic cue to MSCs. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6132-6139.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.032

  225. 225.

    Martins A.M., Eng G., Caridade S.G., Mano J.F., Reis R.L., Vunjak-Novakovic G. Electrically Conductive Chitosan/Carbon Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:635-643.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm401679q

  226. 226.

    MacDonald R.A., Laurenzi B.F., Viswanathan G., Ajayan P.M., Stegemann J.P. Collagen–carbon nanotube composite materials as scaffolds in tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2005;74:489-496.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.30386

  227. 227.

    Pok S., Vitale F., Eichmann S.L., Benavides O.M., Pasquali M., Jacot J.G. Biocompatible Carbon Nanotube–Chitosan Scaffold Matching the Electrical Conductivity of the Heart. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9822-9832.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn503693h

  228. 228.

    Wan A.M.-D., Inal S., Williams T., Wang K., Leleux P., Estevez L., Giannelis E.P., Fischbach C., Malliaras G.G., Gourdon D. 3D Conducting Polymer Platforms for Electrical Control of Protein Conformation and Cellular Functions. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2015;3:5040-5048.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5tb00390c

  229. 229.

    Petrisor B., Lau J.T.C. Electrical Bone Stimulation: An Overview and its Use in High Risk and Charcot Foot and Ankle Reconstructions. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:609-620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fcl.2005.06.003

  230. 230.

    Björninen M., Siljander A., Pelto J., Hyttinen J., Kellomäki M., Miettinen S., Seppänen R., Haimi S. Comparison of chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid doped conductive polypyrrole films for adipose stem cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014;42:1889-1900.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-014-1023-7

  231. 231.

    Hamlehkhan A., Mozafari M., Nezafati N., Azami M., Samadikuchaksaraei A. Novel bioactive poly (ε-caprolactone)-gelatin-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Key Eng. Mater. 2012;493–494:909-915.

    Not in our library10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.493-494.909

  232. 232.

    Cheng C.W., Solorio L.D., Alsberg E. Decellularized tissue and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32:462-484.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.012

  233. 233.

    Henkel J., Woodruff M.A., Epari D.R., Steck R., Glatt V., Dickinson I.C., Choong P.F.M., Schuetz M.A., Hutmacher D.W. Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions—A 21st Century Perspective. Bone Res. 2013;1:216.

    Not in our library10.4248/br201303002

  234. 234.

    Baxter F.R., Bowen C.R., Turner I.G., Dent A.C. Electrically active bioceramics: A review of interfacial responses. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010;38:2079-2092.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-010-9977-6

  235. 235.

    Griffin M., Bayat A. Electrical stimulation in bone healing: Critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence. Eplasty. 2011;11:e34.

    Not in our library

  236. 236.

    Cui H., Wang Y., Cui L., Zhang P., Wang X., Wei Y., Chen X. In Vitro Studies on Regulation of Osteogenic Activities by Electrical Stimulus on Biodegradable Electroactive Polyelectrolyte Multilayers. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:3146-3157.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm5007695

  237. 237.

    Shahini A., Yazdimamaghani M., Walker K.J., Eastman M.A., Hatami-Marbini H., Smith B.J., Ricci J.L., Madihally S.V., Vashaee D., Tayebi L. 3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014;9:167.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s54668

  238. 238.

    Liu Y., Cui H., Zhuang X., Wei Y., Chen X. Electrospinning of aniline pentamer-graft-gelatin/PLLA nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:5074-5080.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.036

  239. 239.

    Lyu C.-Q., Lu J.-Y., Cao C.-H., Luo D., Fu Y.-X., He Y.-S., Zou D.-R. Induction of Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells by a Novel Self-Supporting Graphene Hydrogel Film and the Possible Underlying Mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:20245-20254.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b05802

  240. 240.

    Meng S., Zhang Z., Rouabhia M. Accelerated osteoblast mineralization on a conductive substrate by multiple electrical stimulation. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2011;29:535-544.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00774-010-0257-1

  241. 241.

    Meng S., Rouabhia M., Zhang Z. Electrical stimulation modulates osteoblast proliferation and bone protein production through heparin-bioactivated conductive scaffolds. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013;34:189-199.

    Not in our library10.1002/bem.21766

  242. 242.

    Whitehead M.A., Fan D., Akkaraju G.R., Canham L.T., Coffer J.L. Accelerated calcification in electrically conductive polymer composites comprised of poly (ε-caprolactone), polyaniline, and bioactive mesoporous silicon. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2007;83:225-234.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.31547

  243. 243.

    Runge M.B., Dadsetan M., Baltrusaitis J., Yaszemski M.J. Electrically conductive surface modifications of three-dimensional polypropylene fumarate scaffolds. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2011;25:S15.

    Not in our library

  244. 244.

    Pelto J., Björninen M., Pälli A., Talvitie E., Hyttinen J., Mannerström B., Suuronen Seppanen R., Kellomäki M., Miettinen S., Haimi S. Novel polypyrrole-coated polylactide scaffolds enhance adipose stem cell proliferation and early osteogenic differentiation. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2013;19:882-892.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0111

  245. 245.

    Cui H., Liu Y., Deng M., Pang X., Zhang P., Wang X., Chen X., Wei Y. Synthesis of biodegradable and electroactive tetraaniline grafted poly (ester amide) copolymers for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2881-2889.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm300897j

  246. 246.

    Newman P., Minett A., Ellis-Behnke R., Zreiqat H. Carbon nanotubes: Their potential and pitfalls for bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2013;9:1139-1158.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2013.06.001

  247. 247.

    Nishida E., Miyaji H., Takita H., Kanayama I., Tsuji M., Akasaka T., Sugaya T., Sakagami R., Kawanami M. Graphene oxide coating facilitates the bioactivity of scaffold material for tissue engineering. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;53:06JD04.

    Not in our library10.7567/jjap.53.06jd04

  248. 248.

    Xie X., Hu K., Fang D., Shang L., Tran S.D., Cerruti M. Graphene and hydroxyapatite self-assemble into homogeneous, free standing nanocomposite hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Nanoscale. 2015;7:7992-8002.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5nr01107h

  249. 249.

    Elkhenany H., Amelse L., Lafont A., Bourdo S., Caldwell M., Neilsen N., Dervishi E., Derek O., Biris A.S., Anderson D. Graphene supports in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of goat adult mesenchymal stem cells: Potential for bone tissue engineering. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015;35:367-374.

    Not in our library10.1002/jat.3024

  250. 250.

    Sayyar S., Murray E., Thompson B., Chung J., Officer D.L., Gambhir S., Spinks G.M., Wallace G.G. Processable conducting graphene/chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2015;3:481-490.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4tb01636j

  251. 251.

    Rajzer I., Rom M., Menaszek E., Pasierb P. Conductive PANI patterns on electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds modified with bioactive particles for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Lett. 2015;138:60-63.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matlet.2014.09.077

  252. 252.

    Sirivisoot S., Harrison B.S. Skeletal myotube formation enhanced by electrospun polyurethane carbon nanotube scaffolds. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011;6:2483.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s24073

  253. 253.

    Bach A., Beier J., Stern-Staeter J., Horch R. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2004;8:413-422.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00466.x

  254. 254.

    Bian W., Bursac N. Tissue engineering of functional skeletal muscle: Challenges and recent advances. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2008;27:109-113.

    Not in our library10.1109/memb.2008.928460

  255. 255.

    Kawahara Y., Yamaoka K., Iwata M., Fujimura M., Kajiume T., Magaki T., Takeda M., Ide T., Kataoka K., Asashima M. Novel electrical stimulation sets the cultured myoblast contractile function to ‘on’. Pathobiology. 2007;73:288-294.

    Not in our library10.1159/000099123

  256. 256.

    Gilmore K.J., Kita M., Han Y., Gelmi A., Higgins M.J., Moulton S.E., Clark G.M., Kapsa R., Wallace G.G. Skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation on polypyrrole substrates doped with extracellular matrix components. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5292-5304.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.059

  257. 257.

    Stern-Straeter J., Bach A., Stangenberg L., Foerster V., Horch R., Stark G., Beier J. Impact of electrical stimulation on three-dimensional myoblast cultures-a real-time RT-PCR study. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2005;9:883-892.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00386.x

  258. 258.

    Jun I., Jeong S., Shin H. The stimulation of myoblast differentiation by electrically conductive sub-micron fibers. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2038-2047.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.063

  259. 259.

    Wang L., Wu Y., Guo B., Ma P.X. Nanofiber yarn/hydrogel core–shell scaffolds mimicking native skeletal muscle tissue for guiding 3D myoblast alignment, elongation, and differentiation. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9167-9179.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.5b03644

  260. 260.

    Quigley A.F., Razal J.M., Kita M., Jalili R., Gelmi A., Penington A., Ovalle-Robles R., Baughman R.H., Clark G.M., Wallace G.G. Electrical stimulation of myoblast proliferation and differentiation on aligned nanostructured conductive polymer platforms. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012;1:801-808.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201200102

  261. 261.

    Chen M.-C., Sun Y.-C., Chen Y.-H. Electrically conductive nanofibers with highly oriented structures and their potential application in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5562-5572.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.024

  262. 262.

    Ku S.H., Lee S.H., Park C.B. Synergic effects of nanofiber alignment and electroactivity on myoblast differentiation. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6098-6104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.018

  263. 263.

    Li L., Ge J., Wang L., Guo B., Ma P.X. Electroactive nanofibrous biomimetic scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2014;2:6119-6130.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4tb00493k

  264. 264.

    Ribeiro S., Costa P., Ribeiro C., Sencadas V., Botelho G., Lanceros-Méndez S. Electrospun styrene–butadiene–styrene elastomer copolymers for tissue engineering applications: Effect of butadiene/styrene ratio, block structure, hydrogenation and carbon nanotube loading on physical properties and cytotoxicity. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014;67:30-38.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.025

  265. 265.

    Wang Q., He W., Huang J., Liu S., Wu G., Teng W., Wang Q., Dong Y. Synthesis of water soluble, biodegradable, and electroactive polysaccharide crosslinker with aldehyde and carboxylic groups for biomedical applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2011;11:362-372.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.201000256

  266. 266.

    Hardy J.G., Lee J.Y., Schmidt C.E. Biomimetic conducting polymer-based tissue scaffolds. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013;24:847-854.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.011

  267. 267.

    Zarrintaj P., Mostafapoor F., Milan P.B., Saeb M.R. Theranostic Platforms Proposed for Cancerous Stem Cells: A Review. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;14:137-145.

    Not in our library10.2174/1574888x13666181002152247

  268. 268.

    Tahmasbi Rad A., Ali N., Kotturi H.S.R., Yazdimamaghani M., Smay J., Vashaee D., Tayebi L. Conducting scaffolds for liver tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2014;102:4169-4181.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35080

  269. 269.

    Mohebbi S., Nezhad M.N., Zarrintaj P., Jafari S.H., Gholizadeh S.S., Saeb M.R., Mozafari M. Chitosan in biomedical engineering: A critical review. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;14:93-116.

    Not in our library10.2174/1574888x13666180912142028

  270. 270.

    Tian B., Liu J., Dvir T., Jin L., Tsui J.H., Qing Q., Suo Z., Langer R., Kohane D.S., Lieber C.M. Macroporous nanowire nanoelectronic scaffolds for synthetic tissues. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:986-994.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat3404

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.