Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Integrating Molecular Perspectives: Strategies for Comprehensive Multi-Omics Integrative Data Analysis and Machine Learning Applications in Transcriptomics, Proteomics, and Metabolomics

Pedro H. Godoy Sanches, Nicolly Clemente de Melo, Andreia M. Porcari and 1 more

Biology · 2024 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3390/biology13110848

Abstract

Simple Summary. Recent high-throughput technologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have allowed progress in understanding biological systems at different levels of detail. Even so, it is necessary to integrate multiple omics data sets to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the subject under study. In this article, we review the methods used for integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data and summarize them in three approaches: combined omics integration, correlation-based integration strategies, and machine learning integrative approaches. Our goal is to showcase the uses and limitations of each approach, allowing researchers to choose the more appropriate tool for each scenario to extract a comprehensive view of a biological system.

Abstract. With the advent of high-throughput technologies, the field of omics has made significant strides in characterizing biological systems at various levels of complexity. Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics are the three most widely used omics technologies, each providing unique insights into different layers of a biological system. However, analyzing each omics data set separately may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject under study. Therefore, integrating multi-omics data has become increasingly important in bioinformatics research. In this article, we review strategies for integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data, including co-expression analysis, metabolite–gene networks, constraint-based models, pathway enrichment analysis, and interactome analysis. We discuss combined omics integration approaches, correlation-based strategies, and machine learning techniques that utilize one or more types of omics data. By presenting these methods, we aim to provide researchers with a better understanding of how to integrate omics data to gain a more comprehensive view of a biological system, facilitating the identification of complex patterns and interactions that might be missed by single-omics analyses.

References 158

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Hasanzad M., Sarhangi N., Ehsani Chimeh S., Ayati N., Afzali M., Khatami F., Nikfar S., Aghaei Meybodi H.R. Precision Medicine Journey through Omics Approach. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2022;21:881-888.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40200-021-00913-0

  3. 3.

    Karczewski K.J., Snyder M.P. Integrative Omics for Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;19:299-310.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg.2018.4

  4. 4.

    Picard M., Scott-Boyer M.P., Bodein A., Périn O., Droit A. Integration Strategies of Multi-Omics Data for Machine Learning Analysis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:3735-3746.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030

  5. 5.

    Rozanova S., Barkovits K., Nikolov M., Schmidt C., Urlaub H., Marcus K. Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021;2228:85-116.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-0716-1024-4_8

  6. 6.

    Reel P.S., Reel S., Pearson E., Trucco E., Jefferson E. Using Machine Learning Approaches for Multi-Omics Data Analysis: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021;49:107739.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107739

  7. 7.

    de Carvalho L.M., Borelli G., Camargo A.P., de Assis M.A., de Ferraz S.M.F., Fiamenghi M.B., José J., Mofatto L.S., Nagamatsu S.T., Persinoti G.F., et al. Bioinformatics Applied to Biotechnology: A Review towards Bioenergy Research. Biomass Bioenergy. 2019;123:195-224.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.016

  8. 8.

    Wang R., Li B., Lam S.M., Shui G. Integration of Lipidomics and Metabolomics for In-Depth Understanding of Cellular Mechanism and Disease Progression. J. Genet. Genom. 2020;47:69-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jgg.2019.11.009

  9. 9.

    Idle J.R., Gonzalez F.J. Metabolomics. Cell Metab. 2007;6:348-351.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.005

  10. 10.

    Athieniti E., Spyrou G.M. A Guide to Multi-Omics Data Collection and Integration for Translational Medicine. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023;21:134-149.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.050

  11. 11.

    Budzinski I.G.F., de Moraes F.E., Cataldi T.R., Franceschini L.M., Labate C.A. Network Analyses and Data Integration of Proteomics and Metabolomics from Leaves of Two Contrasting Varieties of Sugarcane in Response to Drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:446557.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2019.01524

  12. 12.

    Dimitrakopoulos C., Hindupur S.K., Hafliger L., Behr J., Montazeri H., Hall M.N., Beerenwinkel N. Network-Based Integration of Multi-Omics Data for Prioritizing Cancer Genes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2441-2448.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bty148

  13. 13.

    Misra B.B., Langefeld C., Olivier M., Cox L.A. Integrated Omics: Tools, Advances and Future Approaches. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2019;62:R21-R45.

    Not in our library10.1530/jme-18-0055

  14. 14.

    Cambiaghi A., Ferrario M., Masseroli M. Analysis of Metabolomic Data: Tools, Current Strategies and Future Challenges for Omics Data Integration. Brief. Bioinform. 2017;18:498-510.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbw031

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Fukushima A., Kusano M., Redestig H., Arita M., Saito K. Integrated Omics Approaches in Plant Systems Biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009;13:532-538.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.022

  17. 17.

    Hrovatin K., Fischer D.S., Theis F.J. Toward Modeling Metabolic State from Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Mol. Metab. 2022;57:101396.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101396

  18. 18.

    Sun Y., Liu Z., Fu Y., Yang Y., Lu J., Pan M., Wen T., Xie X., Bai Y., Ge Q. Single-Cell Multi-Omics Sequencing and Its Application in Tumor Heterogeneity. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2023;22:313-328.

    Not in our library10.1093/bfgp/elad009

  19. 19.

    Dimitriu M.A., Lazar-Contes I., Roszkowski M., Mansuy I.M. Single-Cell Multiomics Techniques: From Conception to Applications. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;10:854317.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2022.854317

  20. 20.

    Flynn E., Almonte-Loya A., Fragiadakis G.K. Single-cell multiomics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2023;6:313-337.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020422-050645

  21. 21.

    Adossa N., Khan S., Rytkönen K.T., Elo L.L. Computational Strategies for Single-Cell Multi-Omics Integration. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:2588-2596.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.060

  22. 22.

    Baysoy A., Bai Z., Satija R., Fan R. The Technological Landscape and Applications of Single-Cell Multi-Omics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:695-713.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41580-023-00615-w

  23. 23.

    Chen G., Yu R., Chen X. Editorial: Integrative Analysis of Single-Cell and/or Bulk Multi-Omics Sequencing Data. Front. Genet. 2023;13:1121999.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2022.1121999

  24. 24.

    Huang Y., Mohanty V., Dede M., Tsai K., Daher M., Li L., Rezvani K., Chen K. Characterizing Cancer Metabolism from Bulk and Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data Using METAFlux. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4883.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-40457-w

  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Zeng F., Shi M., Xiao H., Chi X. WGCNA-Based Identification of Hub Genes and Key Pathways Involved in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2021;2021:5633211.

    Not in our library10.1155/2021/5633211

  28. 28.

    Choi H., Na K.J. Integrative Analysis of Imaging and Transcriptomic Data of the Immune Landscape Associated with Tumor Metabolism in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Clinical and Prognostic Implications. Theranostics. 2018;8:1956-1965.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.23767

  29. 29.

    Liu P., Luo J., Zheng Q., Chen Q., Zhai N., Xu S., Xu Y., Jin L., Xu G., Lu X., et al. Integrating Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveals Molecular Networks Involved in Genetic and Environmental Variation in Tobacco. DNA Res. 2020;27:dsaa006.

    Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsaa006

  30. 30.

    Amiri F., Moghadam A., Tahmasebi A., Niazi A. Identification of Key Genes Involved in Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis in Digitalis Purpurea. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0277293.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0277293

  31. 31.

    Moghadam A., Foroozan E., Tahmasebi A., Taghizadeh M.S., Bolhassani M., Jafari M. System Network Analysis of Rosmarinus Officinalis Transcriptome and Metabolome—Key Genes in Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0282316.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0282316

  32. 32.

    Ponsuksili S., Trakooljul N., Hadlich F., Methling K., Lalk M., Murani E., Wimmers K. Genetic Regulation of Liver Metabolites and Transcripts Linking to Biochemical-Clinical Parameters. Front. Genet. 2019;10:419414.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2019.00348

  33. 33.

    Zhu Y., Mordaunt C.E., Durbin-Johnson B.P., Caudill M.A., Malysheva O.V., Miller J.W., Green R., James S.J., Melnyk S.B., Fallin M.D., et al. Expression Changes in Epigenetic Gene Pathways Associated with One-Carbon Nutritional Metabolites in Maternal Blood from Pregnancies Resulting in Autism and Non-Typical Neurodevelopment. Autism Res. 2021;14:11-28.

    Not in our library10.1002/aur.2428

  34. 34.

    Hoang L.T., Domingo-Sabugo C., Starren E.S., Willis-Owen S.A.G., Morris-Rosendahl D.J., Nicholson A.G., Cookson W.O.C.M., Moffatt M.F. Metabolomic, Transcriptomic and Genetic Integrative Analysis Reveals Important Roles of Adenosine Diphosphate in Haemostasis and Platelet Activation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2019;13:2406-2421.

    Not in our library10.1002/1878-0261.12568

  35. 35.

    Wang Z., Zhang X., He S., Rehman A., Jia Y., Li H., Pan Z., Geng X., Gao Q., Wang L., et al. Transcriptome Co-Expression Network and Metabolome Analysis Identifies Key Genes and Regulators of Proanthocyanidins Biosynthesis in Brown Cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;12:822198.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2021.822198

  36. 36.

    Green R.E., Lord J., Scelsi M.A., Xu J., Wong A., Naomi-James S., Handy A., Gilchrist L., Williams D.M., Parker T.D., et al. Investigating Associations between Blood Metabolites, Later Life Brain Imaging Measures, and Genetic Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2023;15:38.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13195-023-01184-y

  37. 37.

    Green R., Lord J., Xu J., Maddock J., Kim M., Dobson R., Legido-Quigley C., Wong A., Richards M., Proitsi P. Metabolic Correlates of Late Midlife Cognitive Outcomes: Findings from the 1946 British Birth Cohort. Brain Commun. 2022;4:fcab291.

    Not in our library10.1093/braincomms/fcab291

  38. 38.

    Carson C., Lawson H.A. Genetic Background and Diet Affect Brown Adipose Gene Coexpression Networks Associated with Metabolic Phenotypes. Physiol. Genom. 2020;52:223-233.

    Not in our library10.1152/physiolgenomics.00003.2020

  39. 39.

    Zhao X., Ge W., Miao Z. Integrative Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveals the Accumulation Patterns of Key Metabolites Associated with Flavonoids and Terpenoids of Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:8644.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-024-57716-5

  40. 40.

    Xie Z., Wang J., Wang W., Wang Y., Xu J., Li Z., Zhao X., Fu B. Integrated Analysis of the Transcriptome and Metabolome Revealed the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Enhanced Salt Tolerance of Rice Due to the Application of Exogenous Melatonin. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;11:618680.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2020.618680

  41. 41.

    Zhou Z., Liu J., Meng W., Sun Z., Tan Y., Liu Y., Tan M., Wang B., Yang J. Integrated Analysis of Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveals Molecular Mechanisms of Rice with Different Salinity Tolerances. Plants. 2023;12:3359.

    Not in our library10.3390/plants12193359

  42. 42.

    Zhao D., Zhang Y., Ren H., Shi Y., Dong D., Li Z., Cui G., Shen Y., Mou Z., Kennelly E.J., et al. Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals the Evolutionary Origin of Diterpenoid Alkaloid Biosynthesis Pathways in Aconitum. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023;65:2320-2335.

    Not in our library10.1111/jipb.13565

  43. 43.

    Nikiforova V.J., Daub C.O., Hesse H., Willmitzer L., Hoefgen R. Integrative Gene-Metabolite Network with Implemented Causality Deciphers Informational Fluxes of Sulphur Stress Response. J. Exp. Bot. 2005;56:1887-1896.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/eri179

  44. 44.

    Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.1239303

  45. 45.

    Csárdi G., Nepusz T., Müller K., Horvát S., Traag V., Zanini F., Noom D. Igraph for R: R Interface of the Igraph Library for Graph Theory and Network Analysis, Version 1.4. Zenodo. 2023.

    Not in our library10.5281/zenodo.10369053

  46. 46.

    Rai A., Rai M., Kamochi H., Mori T., Nakabayashi R., Nakamura M., Suzuki H., Saito K., Yamazaki M. Multiomics-Based Characterization of Specialized Metabolites Biosynthesis in Cornus Officinalis. DNA Res. 2020;27:dsaa009.

    Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsaa009

  47. 47.

    Saito K., Hirai M.Y., Yonekura-Sakakibara K. Decoding Genes with Coexpression Networks and Metabolomics—“Majority Report by Precogs”. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:36-43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2007.10.006

  48. 48.

    Cline M.S., Smoot M., Cerami E., Kuchinsky A., Landys N., Workman C., Christmas R., Avila-Campilo I., Creech M., Gross B., et al. Integration of Biological Networks and Gene Expression Data Using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:2366-2382.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.324

  49. 49.

    Liu X.L., Ming Y.N., Zhang J.Y., Chen X.Y., Zeng M.D., Mao Y.M. Gene-Metabolite Network Analysis in Different Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Phenotypes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017;49:e283.

    Not in our library10.1038/emm.2016.123

  50. 50.

    Mounet F., Moing A., Garcia V., Petit J., Maucourt M., Deborde C., Bernillon S., Le Gall G., Colquhoun I., Defernez M., et al. Gene and Metabolite Regulatory Network Analysis of Early Developing Fruit Tissues Highlights New Candidate Genes for the Control of Tomato Fruit Composition and Development. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:1505-1528.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.133967

  51. 51.

    Mercatelli D., Lopez-Garcia G., Giorgi F.M. Corto: A Lightweight R Package for Gene Network Inference and Master Regulator Analysis. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:3916-3917.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa223

  52. 52.

    Cavicchioli M.V., Santorsola M., Balboni N., Mercatelli D., Giorgi F.M. Prediction of Metabolic Profiles from Transcriptomics Data in Human Cancer Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:3867.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms23073867

  53. 53.

    Wang B., Mezlini A.M., Demir F., Fiume M., Tu Z., Brudno M., Haibe-Kains B., Goldenberg A. Similarity Network Fusion for Aggregating Data Types on a Genomic Scale. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:333-337.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2810

  54. 54.

    Miranda J., Paules C., Noell G., Youssef L., Paternina-Caicedo A., Crovetto F., Cañellas N., Garcia-Martín M.L., Amigó N., Eixarch E., et al. Similarity Network Fusion to Identify Phenotypes of Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses. iScience. 2023;26:107620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.isci.2023.107620

  55. 55.

    Raphael B.J., Hruban R.H., Aguirre A.J., Moffitt R.A., Yeh J.J., Stewart C., Robertson A.G., Cherniack A.D., Gupta M., Getz G., et al. Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:185-203.e13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.007

  56. 56.

    Blimkie T., Lee A.H.Y., Hancock R.E.W. MetaBridge: An Integrative Multi-Omics Tool for Metabolite-Enzyme Mapping. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020;70:e98.

    Not in our library10.1002/cpbi.98

  57. 57.

    Caspi R., Billington R., Keseler I.M., Kothari A., Krummenacker M., Midford P.E., Ong W.K., Paley S., Subhraveti P., Karp P.D. The MetaCyc Database of Metabolic Pathways and Enzymes—A 2019 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D445-D453.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz862

  58. 58.

    Wu T., Hu E., Xu S., Chen M., Guo P., Dai Z., Feng T., Zhou L., Tang W., Zhan L., et al. ClusterProfiler 4.0: A Universal Enrichment Tool for Interpreting Omics Data. Innovation. 2021;2:100141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141

  59. 59.
  60. 60.
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.

    Dutta N.K., Tornheim J.A., Fukutani K.F., Paradkar M., Tiburcio R.T., Kinikar A., Valvi C., Kulkarni V., Pradhan N., Shivakumar S.V.B.Y., et al. Integration of Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Reveals Novel Biomarkers in the Blood for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Children. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:19527.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-75513-8

  64. 64.
  65. 65.

    Wang H., Liu C., Xie X., Niu M., Wang Y., Cheng X., Zhang B., Zhang D., Liu M., Sun R., et al. Multi-Omics Blood Atlas Reveals Unique Features of Immune and Platelet Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Breakthrough Infection. Immunity. 2023;56:1410-1428.e8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2023.05.007

  66. 66.

    Cavill R., Jennen D., Kleinjans J., Briedé J.J. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Data Integration. Brief. Bioinform. 2016;17:891-901.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbv090

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Larsson I., Uhlén M., Zhang C., Mardinoglu A. Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling of Glioblastoma Reveals Promising Targets for Drug Development. Front. Genet. 2020;11:459644.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2020.00381

  69. 69.

    Karakitsou E., Foguet C., Contreras Mostazo M.G., Kurrle N., Schnütgen F., Michaelis M., Cinatl J., Marin S., Cascante M. Genome-Scale Integration of Transcriptome and Metabolome Unveils Squalene Synthase and Dihydrofolate Reductase as Targets against AML Cells Resistant to Chemotherapy. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:4059-4066.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.049

  70. 70.

    Sen P., Orešič M. Integrating Omics Data in Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling: A Methodological Perspective for Precision Medicine. Metabolites. 2023;13:855.

    Not in our library10.3390/metabo13070855

  71. 71.

    Kim M.K., Lun D.S. Methods for Integration of Transcriptomic Data in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2014;11:59-65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2014.08.009

  72. 72.

    Roshanzamir F., Robinson J.L., Cook D., Karimi-Jafari M.H., Nielsen J. Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Adapts Its Metabolism to Destination Tissues While Retaining Key Metabolic Signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2205456119.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2205456119

  73. 73.

    Orth J.D., Thiele I., Palsson B.O. What Is Flux Balance Analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:245.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1614

  74. 74.

    Lewis N.E., Hixson K.K., Conrad T.M., Lerman J.A., Charusanti P., Polpitiya A.D., Adkins J.N., Schramm G., Purvine S.O., Lopez-Ferrer D., et al. Omic Data from Evolved E. coli Are Consistent with Computed Optimal Growth from Genome-Scale Models. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010;6:390.

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2010.47

  75. 75.

    Pereira V., Cruz F., Rocha M. MEWpy: A Computational Strain Optimization Workbench in Python. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2494-2496.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btab013

  76. 76.
  77. 77.

    Robinson J.L., Kocabaş P., Wang H., Cholley P.E., Cook D., Nilsson A., Anton M., Ferreira R., Domenzain I., Billa V., et al. An Atlas of Human Metabolism. Sci. Signal. 2020;13:eaaz1482.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aaz1482

  78. 78.

    Monk J.M., Lloyd C.J., Brunk E., Mih N., Sastry A., King Z., Takeuchi R., Nomura W., Zhang Z., Mori H., et al. IML1515, a Knowledgebase That Computes Escherichia Coli Traits. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:904-908.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3956

  79. 79.
  80. 80.
  81. 81.

    Zhou J., Zhuang Y., Xia J. Integration of Enzyme Constraints in a Genome-Scale Metabolic Model of Aspergillus Niger Improves Phenotype Predictions. Microb. Cell Factories. 2021;20:125.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12934-021-01614-2

  82. 82.

    Arend M., Zimmer D., Xu R., Sommer F., Mühlhaus T., Nikoloski Z. Proteomics and Constraint-Based Modelling Reveal Enzyme Kinetic Properties of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii on a Genome Scale. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4781.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-40498-1

  83. 83.

    Wu K., Mao Z., Mao Y., Niu J., Cai J., Yuan Q., Yun L., Liao X., Wang Z., Ma H. EcBSU1: A Genome-Scale Enzyme-Constrained Model of Bacillus Subtilis Based on the ECMpy Workflow. Microorganisms. 2023;11:178.

    Not in our library10.3390/microorganisms11010178

  84. 84.

    Placzek S., Schomburg I., Chang A., Jeske L., Ulbrich M., Tillack J., Schomburg D. BRENDA in 2017: New Perspectives and New Tools in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D380-D388.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkw952

  85. 85.
  86. 86.

    Chen J., Luo P., Wang C., Yang C., Bai Y., He X., Zhang Q., Zhang J., Yang J., Wang S., et al. Integrated Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Proteomics Reveal Cellular-Specific Responses and Microenvironment Remodeling in Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e157360.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.157360

  87. 87.

    Alsagaby S.A. Integration of Proteomics and Transcriptomics Data Sets Identifies Prognostic Markers in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Majmaah J. Health Sci. 2019;7:1.

    Not in our library10.5455/mjhs.2019.01.002

  88. 88.

    Higdon R., Kala J., Wilkins D., Yan J.F., Sethi M.K., Lin L., Liu S., Montague E., Janko I., Choiniere J., et al. Integrated Proteomic and Transcriptomic-Based Approaches to Identifying Signature Biomarkers and Pathways for Elucidation of Daoy and UW228 Subtypes. Proteomes. 2017;5:5.

    Not in our library10.3390/proteomes5010005

  89. 89.

    Gygi S.P., Rochon Y., Franza B.R., Aebersold R. Correlation between Protein and MRNA Abundance in Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:1720-1730.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.19.3.1720

  90. 90.

    Yue X., Huan P., Hu Y., Liu B. Integrated Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses Reveal Potential Mechanisms Linking Thermal Stress and Depressed Disease Resistance in the Turbot Scophthalmus Maximus. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1896.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-20065-1

  91. 91.

    Li G., Zhang B., Zhang H., Xu A., Qian H. Integration of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses Reveals New Insights into the Regulation of Immune Pathways in Midgut of Samia Ricini upon SariNPV Infection. Insects. 2022;13:294.

    Not in our library10.3390/insects13030294

  92. 92.

    Sun Z., Liu Y., He X., Di R., Wang X., Ren C., Zhang Z., Chu M. Integrative Proteomics and Transcriptomics Profiles of the Oviduct Reveal the Prolificacy-Related Candidate Biomarkers of Goats (Capra hircus) in Estrous Periods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:14888.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms232314888

  93. 93.

    Zhang Q., Li Y., Sun L., Chu S., Xu H., Zhou X. Integration of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. in Response to Cold Stress in the Changbai Mountains. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023;50:3607-3616.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11033-022-08114-5

  94. 94.

    Miao J., Yang Z., Guo W., Liu L., Song P., Ding C., Guan W. Integrative Analysis of the Proteome and Transcriptome in Gastric Cancer Identified LRP1B as a Potential Biomarker. Biomark. Med. 2022;16:1101-1111.

    Not in our library10.2217/bmm-2022-0288

  95. 95.

    Colak D., Alaiya A.A., Kaya N., Muiya N.P., AlHarazi O., Shinwari Z., Andres E., Dzimiri N. Integrated Left Ventricular Global Transcriptome and Proteome Profiling in Human End-Stage Dilated Cardiomyopathy. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162669.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0162669

  96. 96.

    Du Y., Clair G.C., Al Alam D., Danopoulos S., Schnell D., Kitzmiller J.A., Misra R.S., Bhattacharya S., Warburton D., Mariani T.J., et al. Integration of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data Identifies Biological Functions in Cell Populations from Human Infant Lung. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2019;317:L347.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00475.2018

  97. 97.

    Peng Z., He S., Gong W., Xu F., Pan Z., Jia Y., Geng X., Du X. Integration of Proteomic and Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Multiple Levels of Genetic Regulation of Salt Tolerance in Cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18:128.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12870-018-1350-1

  98. 98.

    Zheng W., Zhang Y., Sun C., Ge S., Tan Y., Shen H., Yang P. A Multi-Omics Study of Human Testis and Epididymis. Molecules. 2021;26:3345.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules26113345

  99. 99.

    Liu Y., Beyer A., Aebersold R. On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on MRNA Abundance. Cell. 2016;165:535-550.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014

  100. 100.

    Zhang G., Zhong F., Chen L., Qin P., Li J., Zhi F., Tian L., Zhou D., Lin P., Chen H., et al. Integrated Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Roles of Brucella Homolog of BAX Inhibitor 1 in Cell Division and Membrane Homeostasis of Brucella Suis S2. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:632095.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2021.632095

  101. 101.
  102. 102.

    Stark C., Breitkreutz B.J., Reguly T., Boucher L., Breitkreutz A., Tyers M. BioGRID: A General Repository for Interaction Datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D535.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkj109

  103. 103.
  104. 104.

    Wang X.W., Wang T., Schaub D.P., Chen C., Sun Z., Ke S., Hecker J., Maaser-Hecker A., Zeleznik O.A., Zeleznik R., et al. Benchmarking Omics-Based Prediction of Asthma Development in Children. Respir. Res. 2023;24:62.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12931-023-02368-8

  105. 105.

    Arjmand B., Hamidpour S.K., Tayanloo-Beik A., Goodarzi P., Aghayan H.R., Adibi H., Larijani B. Machine Learning: A New Prospect in Multi-Omics Data Analysis of Cancer. Front. Genet. 2022;13:824451.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2022.824451

  106. 106.

    Wekesa J.S., Kimwele M. A Review of Multi-Omics Data Integration through Deep Learning Approaches for Disease Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment. Front. Genet. 2023;14:1199087.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2023.1199087

  107. 107.

    Li R., Li L., Xu Y., Yang J. Machine Learning Meets Omics: Applications and Perspectives. Brief. Bioinform. 2022;23:bbab460.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbab560

  108. 108.

    Leite D.M.C., Brochet X., Resch G., Que Y.A., Neves A., Peña-Reyes C. Computational Prediction of Inter-Species Relationships through Omics Data Analysis and Machine Learning. BMC Bioinform. 2018;19:151-159.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12859-018-2388-7

  109. 109.

    Alharbi F., Vakanski A. Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review. Bioengineering. 2023;10:173.

    Not in our library10.3390/bioengineering10020173

  110. 110.

    Bashiri A., Ghazisaeedi M., Safdari R., Shahmoradi L., Ehtesham H. Improving the Prediction of Survival in Cancer Patients by Using Machine Learning Techniques: Experience of Gene Expression Data: A Narrative Review. Iran. J. Public Health. 2017;46:165.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Hijazi H., Chan C. A Classification Framework Applied to Cancer Gene Expression Profiles. J. Healthc. Eng. 2013;4:255-283.

    Not in our library10.1260/2040-2295.4.2.255

  112. 112.

    Khalsan M., MacHado L.R., Al-Shamery E.S., Ajit S., Anthony K., Mu M., Agyeman M.O. A Survey of Machine Learning Approaches Applied to Gene Expression Analysis for Cancer Prediction. IEEE Access. 2022;10:27522-27534.

    Not in our library10.1109/access.2022.3146312

  113. 113.

    Ravindran U., Gunavathi C. A Survey on Gene Expression Data Analysis Using Deep Learning Methods for Cancer Diagnosis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2023;177:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.08.004

  114. 114.

    Tabares-Soto R., Orozco-Arias S., Romero-Cano V., Bucheli V.S., Rodríguez-Sotelo J.L., Jiménez-Varón C.F. A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms to Classify Cancer Types Based on Microarray Gene Expression Data. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2020;2020:e270.

    Not in our library10.7717/peerj-cs.270

  115. 115.

    Yuan F., Lu L., Zou Q. Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles of Lung Cancer Subtypes with Machine Learning Algorithms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2020;1866:165822.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165822

  116. 116.

    He B., Thomson M., Subramaniam M., Perez R., Ye C.J., Zou J. CloudPred: Predicting Patient Phenotypes from Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2022;2021:337-348.

    Not in our library10.1142/9789811250477_0031

  117. 117.

    Ma Y., Chen J., Wang T., Zhang L., Xu X., Qiu Y., Xiang A.P., Huang W. Accurate Machine Learning Model to Diagnose Chronic Autoimmune Diseases Utilizing Information From B Cells and Monocytes. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:870531.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2022.870531

  118. 118.

    Galdos F.X., Xu S., Goodyer W.R., Duan L., Huang Y.V., Lee S., Zhu H., Lee C., Wei N., Lee D., et al. DevCellPy Is a Machine Learning-Enabled Pipeline for Automated Annotation of Complex Multilayered Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5271.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-33045-x

  119. 119.

    Liu J., Fan Z., Zhao W., Zhou X. Machine Intelligence in Single-Cell Data Analysis: Advances and New Challenges. Front. Genet. 2021;12:655536.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2021.655536

  120. 120.

    Patil A.R., Schug J., Liu C., Lahori D., Descamps H.C., Naji A., Kaestner K.H., Faryabi R.B., Vahedi G. Modeling Type 1 Diabetes Progression Using Machine Learning and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Measurements in Human Islets. Cell Rep. Med. 2024;5:101535.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101535

  121. 121.

    Hu Y., Hase T., Li H.P., Prabhakar S., Kitano H., Ng S.K., Ghosh S., Wee L.J.K. A Machine Learning Approach for the Identification of Key Markers Involved in Brain Development from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. BMC Genom. 2016;17:1025.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12864-016-3317-7

  122. 122.

    Vrahatis A.G., Tasoulis S.K., Maglogiannis I., Plagianakos V.P. Recent Machine Learning Approaches for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data Analysis. Stud. Comput. Intell. 2020;891:65-79.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-662-61114-2_5

  123. 123.

    Barrett T., Wilhite S.E., Ledoux P., Evangelista C., Kim I.F., Tomashevsky M., Marshall K.A., Phillippy K.H., Sherman P.M., Holko M., et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for Functional Genomics Data Sets—Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991-D995.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks1193

  124. 124.

    Weinstein J.N., Collisson E.A., Mills G.B., Shaw K.R.M., Ozenberger B.A., Ellrott K., Sander C., Stuart J.M., Chang K., Creighton C.J., et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer Analysis Project. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:1113-1120.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2764

  125. 125.

    Johnson N.T., Dhroso A., Hughes K.J., Korkin D. Biological Classification with RNA-Seq Data: Can Alternatively Spliced Transcript Expression Enhance Machine Learning Classifiers? RNA. 2018;24:1119-1132.

    Not in our library10.1261/rna.062802.117

  126. 126.

    Kuo W.P., Kim E.Y., Trimarchi J., Jenssen T.K., Vinterbo S.A., Ohno-Machado L. A Primer on Gene Expression and Microarrays for Machine Learning Researchers. J. Biomed. Inform. 2004;37:293-303.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbi.2004.07.002

  127. 127.

    Kelchtermans P., Bittremieux W., De Grave K., Degroeve S., Ramon J., Laukens K., Valkenborg D., Barsnes H., Martens L. Machine Learning Applications in Proteomics Research: How the Past Can Boost the Future. Proteomics. 2014;14:353-366.

    Not in our library10.1002/pmic.201300289

  128. 128.

    Swan A.L., Mobasheri A., Allaway D., Liddell S., Bacardit J. Application of Machine Learning to Proteomics Data: Classification and Biomarker Identification in Postgenomics Biology. OMICS. 2013;17:595-610.

    Not in our library10.1089/omi.2013.0017

  129. 129.

    Barla A., Jurman G., Riccadonna S., Merler S., Chierici M., Furlanello C. Machine Learning Methods for Predictive Proteomics. Brief. Bioinform. 2008;9:119-128.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbn008

  130. 130.

    Neely B.A., Dorfer V., Martens L., Bludau I., Bouwmeester R., Degroeve S., Deutsch E.W., Gessulat S., Käll L., Palczynski P., et al. Toward an Integrated Machine Learning Model of a Proteomics Experiment. J. Proteome Res. 2023;22:681-696.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00711

  131. 131.

    Desaire H., Go E.P., Hua D. Advances, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Proteomics. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022;3:101069.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101069

  132. 132.
  133. 133.

    Sonsare P.M., Gunavathi C. Investigation of Machine Learning Techniques on Proteomics: A Comprehensive Survey. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2019;149:54-69.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.09.004

  134. 134.

    Vishnoi S., Matre H., Garg P., Pandey S.K. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Protein Toxicity Prediction Using Proteomics Data. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2020;96:902-920.

    Not in our library10.1111/cbdd.13701

  135. 135.

    Mann M., Kumar C., Zeng W.F., Strauss M.T. Artificial Intelligence for Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery. Cell Syst. 2021;12:759-770.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cels.2021.06.006

  136. 136.

    Li J., Zhou K., Mu B. Machine Learning for Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis in Proteomics. Curr. Proteom. 2020;18:620-634.

    Not in our library10.2174/1570164617999201023145304

  137. 137.
  138. 138.

    Hindson J. Proteomics and Machine-Learning Models for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease Biomarkers. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:488.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41575-022-00655-1

  139. 139.

    Cox J. Prediction of Peptide Mass Spectral Libraries with Machine Learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;41:33-43.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41587-022-01424-w

  140. 140.

    Sengupta A., Naresh G., Mishra A., Parashar D., Narad P. Proteome Analysis Using Machine Learning Approaches and Its Applications to Diseases. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2021;127:161-216.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.apcsb.2021.02.003

  141. 141.

    Tilocca B., Britti D., Urbani A., Roncada P. Computational Immune Proteomics Approach to Target COVID-19. J. Proteome Res. 2020;19:4233-4241.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00553

  142. 142.

    Bernardes J.S., Pedreira C.E. A Review of Protein Function Prediction Under Machine Learning Perspective. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2013;7:122-141.

    Not in our library10.2174/18722083113079990006

  143. 143.

    Worley B., Powers R. Multivariate Analysis in Metabolomics. Curr. Metabolomics. 2013;1:92.

    Not in our library10.2174/2213235x11301010092

  144. 144.
  145. 145.

    Martín-Blázquez A., Díaz C., González-Flores E., Franco-Rivas D., Jiménez-Luna C., Melguizo C., Prados J., Genilloud O., Vicente F., Caba O., et al. Untargeted LC-HRMS-Based Metabolomics to Identify Novel Biomarkers of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:20198.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-55952-8

  146. 146.

    Goldberg E., Ievari-Shariati S., Kidane B., Kim J., Banerji S., Qing G., Srinathan S., Murphy L., Aliani M. Comparative Metabolomics Studies of Blood Collected in Streck and Heparin Tubes from Lung Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0249648.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0249648

  147. 147.

    French C.D., Willoughby R.E., Pan A., Wong S.J., Foley J.F., Wheat L.J., Fernandez J., Encarnacion R., Ondrush J.M., Fatteh N., et al. NMR Metabolomics of Cerebrospinal Fluid Differentiates Inflammatory Diseases of the Central Nervous System. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0007045.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0007045

  148. 148.

    Collakova E., Aghamirzaie D., Fang Y., Klumas C., Tabataba F., Kakumanu A., Myers E., Heath L.S., Grene R. Metabolic and Transcriptional Reprogramming in Developing Soybean (Glycine Max) Embryos. Metabolites. 2013;3:347-372.

    Not in our library10.3390/metabo3020347

  149. 149.
  150. 150.

    Alreshidi M.M. Selected Metabolites Profiling of Staphylococcus Aureus Following Exposure to Low Temperature and Elevated Sodium Chloride. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:512774.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.00834

  151. 151.

    Broughton-Neiswanger L.E., Rivera-Velez S.M., Suarez M.A., Slovak J.E., Piñeyro P.E., Hwang J.K., Villarino N.F. Urinary Chemical Fingerprint Left behind by Repeated NSAID Administration: Discovery of Putative Biomarkers Using Artificial Intelligence. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0228989.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0228989

  152. 152.
  153. 153.

    Monteleone A.M., Troisi J., Serena G., Fasano A., Grave R.D., Cascino G., Marciello F., Calugi S., Scala G., Corrivetti G., et al. The Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics Profiles of Restricting and Binge-Purging Type Anorexia Nervosa. Nutrients. 2021;13:507.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu13020507

  154. 154.

    Caterino M., Costanzo M., Fedele R., Cevenini A., Gelzo M., Di Minno A., Andolfo I., Capasso M., Russo R., Annunziata A., et al. The Serum Metabolome of Moderate and Severe COVID-19 Patients Reflects Possible Liver Alterations Involving Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:9548.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms22179548

  155. 155.

    Silva A.A.R., Cardoso M.R., Cardoso De Oliveira D., Godoy P., Cecília M., Talarico R., Marrero Gutiérrez J., Rodrigues Peres R.M., De Carvalho L.M., Angelo Da N., et al. Plasma Metabolome Signatures to Predict Responsiveness to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2024;16:2473.

    Not in our library10.3390/cancers16132473

  156. 156.
  157. 157.

    Auslander N., Yizhak K., Weinstock A., Budhu A., Tang W., Wang X.W., Ambs S., Ruppin E. A Joint Analysis of Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Data Uncovers Enhanced Enzyme-Metabolite Coupling in Breast Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29662.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep29662

  158. 158.

    Ghosh T., Zhang W., Ghosh D., Kechris K. Predictive Modeling for Metabolomics Data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020;2104:313.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-0716-0239-3_16

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.