Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Reframing the Debate Surrounding the Yield Gap between Organic and Conventional Farming

Klaus-Peter Wilbois, Jennifer Elise Schmidt

Agronomy · 2019

doi:10.3390/agronomy9020082 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In this article, we review the literature regarding the yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture and then reflect on the corresponding debate on whether or not organic farming can feed the world. We analyze the current framework and highlight the need to reframe the yield gap debate away from “Can organic feed the world?„ towards the more pragmatic question, “How can organic agriculture contribute to feeding the world?„. Furthermore, we challenge the benchmarks that are used in present yield comparison studies, as they are based on fundamentally distinct paradigms of the respective farming methods, and then come up with a novel model to better understand the nature of yield gaps and the benchmarks that they are premised on. We thus conclude that, by establishing appropriate benchmarks, re-prioritizing research needs, and focusing on transforming natural resources rather than inputs, organic systems can raise their yields and play an ever-greater role in global sustainable agriculture and food production in the future.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Cited by papers we hold1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.