Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Driplines Layout Designs Comparison of Moisture Distribution in Clayey Soils, Using Soil Analysis, Calibrated Time Domain Reflectometry Sensors, and Precision Agriculture Geostatistical Imaging for Environmental Irrigation Engineering

Agathos Filintas

AgriEngineering · 2025

doi:10.3390/agriengineering7070229 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The present study implements novel innovative geostatistical imaging using precision agriculture (PA) under sugarbeet field conditions. Two driplines layout designs (d.l.d.) and soil water content (SWC)–irrigation treatments (A: d.l.d. = 1.00 m driplines spacing × 0.50 m emitters inline spacing; B: d.l.d. = 1.50 m driplines spacing × 0.50 m emitters inline spacing) were applied, with two subfactors of clay loam and clay soils (laboratory soil analysis) for modeling (evaluation of seven models) TDR multi-sensor network measurements. Different sensor calibration methods [method 1(M1) = according to factory; method 2 (M2) = according to Hook and Livingston] were applied for the geospatial two-dimensional (2D) imaging of accurate GIS maps of rootzone soil moisture profiles, soil apparent dielectric Ka profiles, and granular and hydraulic parameters profiles, in multiple soil layers (0–75 cm depth). The modeling results revealed that the best-fitted geostatistical model for soil apparent dielectric Ka was the Gaussian model, while spherical and exponential models were identified to be the most appropriate for kriging modelling, and spatial and temporal imaging was used for accurate profile SWC θvTDR (m3·m−3) M1 and M2 maps using TDR sensors. The resulting PA profile map images depict the spatio-temporal soil water and apparent dielectric Ka variability at very high resolutions on a centimeter scale. The best geostatistical validation measures for the PA profile SWC θvTDR maps obtained were MPE = −0.00248 (m3·m−3), RMSE = 0.0395 (m3·m−3), MSPE = −0.0288, RMSSE = 2.5424, ASE = 0.0433, Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency NSE = 0.6229, and MSDR = 0.9937. Based on the results, we recommend d.l.d. A and sensor calibration method 2 for the geospatial 2D imaging of PA GIS maps because these were found to be more accurate, with the lowest statistical and geostatistical errors, and the best validation measures for accurate profile SWC imaging were obtained for clay loam over clay soils. Visualizing sensors’ soil moisture results via geostatistical maps of rootzone profiles have practical implications that assist farmers and scientists in making informed, better and timely environmental irrigation engineering decisions, to save irrigation water, increase water use efficiency and crop production, optimize energy, reduce crop costs, and manage water resources sustainably.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References99

    99 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.