Predicting the Magnitude of Earthquakes Using Grammatical Evolution
Constantina Kopitsa, Ioannis G. Tsoulos, Vasileios Charilogis
Algorithms · 2025
doi:10.3390/a18070405 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Throughout history, human societies have sought to explain natural phenomena through the lens of mythology. Earthquakes, as sudden and often devastating events, have inspired a range of symbolic and mythological interpretations across different civilizations. It was not until the 18th and 19th centuries that a more positivist and scientific approach began to emerge regarding the explanation of earthquakes, recognizing their origin as stemming from processes occurring beneath the Earth’s surface. A pivotal moment in the emergence of modern seismology was the Lisbon earthquake of 1755, which marked a significant shift towards scientific inquiry. This means that the question of how earthquakes occur has been resolved; thanks to advancements in scientific, geological, and geophysical research, it is now well understood that seismic events result from the collision and movement of lithospheric or tectonic plates. The contemporary challenge that emerges, however, lies in whether such seismic phenomena can be accurately predicted. In this paper, a systematic attempt is made to use techniques based on Grammatical Evolution to determine the magnitude of earthquakes. These techniques use freely available data in which the history of large earthquakes is introduced before the application of the proposed techniques. From the execution of the experiments, it has become clear that the use of these techniques can allow for more effective estimation of the magnitude of earthquakes compared to other machine learning techniques from the relevant literature.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References58
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 58 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.