Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care service utilization in Ethiopia according to the WHO recommended standard guidelines

Berhanu Teshome Woldeamanuel

Frontiers in Public Health · 2022

doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.998055 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

BackgroundAdequate maternal health care could prevent 54% of maternal deaths in low- and middle-income countries. In Ethiopia, the maternal mortality rate was reduced from 817 to 412 deaths per 100,000 live births between 2000 and 2016. Thus, the current study focuses on the adequacy of prenatal care (PNC) services rather than the mere prenatal contacts available to assess compliance with the WHO recommended standard guidelines.MethodsA nationally representative cross-sectional dataset from the Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019 was analyzed. Risk factors for prenatal care adequacy were assessed using a multilevel ordinal logistic regression model.ResultsAbout 43% of women met the old WHO recommendation of at least four prenatal contacts, while only 3.5% of women met the new WHO recommended minimum of eight prenatal contacts. The overall adequacy of prenatal care based on the four prenatal care utilization indicators was 52.1% no PNC, 37.4% received inadequate PNC and 10.5% received adequate PNC. Being a rural resident [AOR = 0.694 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.865)] and wanting no more children [AOR = 0.687 (95% CI: 0.544, 0.868)] are associated with inadequate prenatal care. Higher educational attainment of women and spouses, exposure to the media, upper wealth quintile, and a perceived shorter distance to a health facility were significantly associated with adequate prenatal care.ConclusionThe prevalence of adequate prenatal care was lower. Multi-sectoral efforts are needed to improve maternal health targets by reducing maternal mortality through improved health care services.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References35

  1. 6.
  2. 13.
  3. 14.

32 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.