Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

E-Cigarette Use Among Adolescents: An Overview of the Literature and Future Perspectives

Evanthia P. Perikleous, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Emmanouil Paraskakis and 2 more

Frontiers in Public Health · 2018 · Review

doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00086

Abstract

Background. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are rapidly emerging into a new trend among adolescents, signaling a new époque, that of vapers. E-cigarettes are battery-powered nicotine delivery devices that heat a typically flavoring liquid solution into an aerosol mist that users inhale, allowing them to imitate the act of conventional smoking. There are concerns about the impact of e-cigarettes at both individual and public health level.

Aim. To discuss the characteristics of the most vulnerable, to become e-cigarette users, group of adolescents and to further highlight their behaviors and characteristics.

Methods. An electronic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, using combinations of the following keywords: adolescents, teenagers, e-cigarettes, vaping. The search included all types of articles written in English until August 2017. A total of 100 articles were found, and 25 were finally included in the present review.

Results. Older age, male gender, conventional smokers, peer influence, daily smoking, and heavier smoking are the most common characteristics of adolescent e-cigarette users.

Conclusion. E-cigarette use is common, especially between certain subgroups in the adolescent population. Since e-cigarette use is increasing and considering that the long term health effects are still under investigation, targeted interventions towards more susceptible individuals may be an effective prevention strategy.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Rationale-Objectives

Tobacco purchase and usage have shifted to alternative products since the introduction of electronic nicotine delivery systems into the market in the mid-2000s, raising concerns due to increased public interest. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are novel battery-operated hand-held devices designed to deliver smokeless doses of nicotine, through a vaporization process. E-cigarettes have been designed to simulate the sensory experience of smoking, although without combustion.

Nowadays, a wide variety of e-cigarette brands is easily accessible in retail and online shops. E-cigarette advertising expenditures increased sharply, while safety and long-term health effects are still vague based on the present scientific evidence. As a result of the large-scale marketing, e-cigarettes gained widespread pervasiveness among all age groups, including vulnerable adolescents and youths populations. Indeed, recent reports from United States showed that 4.3% of middle school students and 11.3% of high-school students reported having used e-cigarettes in 2016. In addition, reports from UK, comprising data from 60,000 young individuals, aged 11–16 years, showed regular e-cigarette use between 1 and 3% and ever-use between 7 and 18%. Furthermore, data from 24,658 individuals in the 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey reported that almost one-third of adolescents in the United States consider e-cigarettes as less harmful than conventional cigarettes.

E-cigarette vapor contains many of the known harmful toxins of traditional cigarettes, such as formaldehyde, cadmium, and lead, even though usually at a reduced percentage. However, short- and long-term health implications on e-cigarette users remain foggy. E-cigarette marketing is of particular concern, because is creating an illusion that e-cigarettes are safer and healthier than conventional tobacco cigarettes, whereas their safety and their potential role in smoking cessation is still a matter of ongoing debate.

Diverse characteristics influence the vulnerability of adolescents toward e-cigarette usage. These can be intrapersonal, like adolescents’ age, interpersonal, like conflict with family and peers, and contextual comprising community structures and district laws. Several marketing and design product features seem to be more attractive for young people. For example, flavorings or lack of age regulation restricting laws have been implicated as reasons for youth susceptibility to e-cigarettes. An analysis of e-cigarette retail websites, marketing, and promotional campaigns demonstrated frequent appeals to adolescents such as use by celebrities, feature cartoons, and enhanced social activity as well as sexual appeal.

It is a common assumption that adolescents have higher rates of impulsivity, and therefore proclivity of adopting dangerous behaviors, rather than other age groups. According to the theoretical model of planned behavior, individuals’ perceptions influence their choice to participate in a specific behavior. Consistent with the aforementioned theory, many youths perceive e-cigarettes as safer, easier to conceal, and healthier alternatives compared with combustible cigarettes. Youths who have lower harm perceptions may be particularly susceptible to e-cigarette and polytobacco use, conversely those who perceive e-cigarettes as more harmful would be less possible to use them.

Marketing, especially through social media, has a salient role in vaping promotion among adolescents; whereas retail stores are a prominent source of e-cigarette display. Four Scottish communities participated in a recent observational study in which a potential concern has emerged due to the placement of e-cigarettes, in 36% of stores, near to products popular to children. E-cigarettes are often marketed and displayed on countertops near till points and next to products of particular interest to children and adolescents; this may lead to the embracing of e-cigarettes as a broadly used and accepted product. However, several US jurisdictions have passed laws that increased the minimum age of sale for all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to 21 years.

Future research is imperative to illustrate the motivations behind teenagers’ experimentation with e-cigarettes, while continued monitoring is warranted to clarify the temporal relationship between e-cigarette and tobacco products, with firmer tobacco control and social networking policies to prevent smoking initiation and lifetime continuation.

Search Strategy

We performed an electronic search in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, using combinations of the following keywords: adolescents, teenagers, e-cigarettes, vaping. The search included all types of articles written in English until August 2017. A total of 100 articles were found, and 25 were finally included in the present review. Exclusion criteria were the following: included participants older than 18 years (n = 30 articles), not original research (n = 2 articles), not relevant data, for example, e-cigarette marketing issues, consumers’ preference in certain products, etc. (n = 31 articles), use of conventional cigarettes (n = 8 articles), use of alternative tobacco products (n = 4). The followed strategy and search results are displayed in Figure 1.

Results

The large body of evidence points to an increased interest in exploring the characteristics among adolescent e-cigarette users. Table 1 summarizes the current literature about the characteristics of adolescent users regarding e-cigarettes. E-cigarette has a large dispersion and penetration among teenagers, and is becoming the most commonly used tobacco product. Many researchers declared that the most frequent reason behind adolescents’ e-cigarette experimentation was curiosity and the irresistible urge to try something new. On the contrary, major causes of e-cigarette smoking cessation were the following: losing interest, perceiving them as uncool, and enunciating anxiety about health.

Characteristics of vulnerable adolescent populations: Male gender: Gender was found to be a predictor of current e-cigarette use with males being significantly more likely to declare having already tried it than females.School performance: Vocational school career, lower school performance, being out of school, and studying at disadvantaged school have been demonstrated that are correlated with both e-cigarette ever- and daily use. These factors are also predisposing to conventional smoking. On the other hand, in a recent study, researchers have found that non-users and e-cigarette-only users had higher mean grades than the cigarette-only group, and the non-user group had higher mean grades than the dual user group.Age-grade: In a previous study, both increased use of e-cigarette, and e-cigarette perceived harmfulness and awareness have been delineated with advancing school grade. This, steady with age, increase has been demonstrated in several studies, highlighting the urgent need of novel research to shed further light into the age-related trajectories of e-cigarette use.Economic status: Both being in employment and being affluent provide higher odds of using e-cigarettes.Tobacco use and related factors: Tobacco-related determinants are stronger characteristics of e-cigarettes usage than sociodemographic factors. Daily smoking, parental or household member smoking, peers smoking, ever-use of all tobacco products like snus, and waterpipes were associated with e-cigarette use.

Male gender: Gender was found to be a predictor of current e-cigarette use with males being significantly more likely to declare having already tried it than females.

School performance: Vocational school career, lower school performance, being out of school, and studying at disadvantaged school have been demonstrated that are correlated with both e-cigarette ever- and daily use. These factors are also predisposing to conventional smoking. On the other hand, in a recent study, researchers have found that non-users and e-cigarette-only users had higher mean grades than the cigarette-only group, and the non-user group had higher mean grades than the dual user group.

Age-grade: In a previous study, both increased use of e-cigarette, and e-cigarette perceived harmfulness and awareness have been delineated with advancing school grade. This, steady with age, increase has been demonstrated in several studies, highlighting the urgent need of novel research to shed further light into the age-related trajectories of e-cigarette use.

Economic status: Both being in employment and being affluent provide higher odds of using e-cigarettes.

Tobacco use and related factors: Tobacco-related determinants are stronger characteristics of e-cigarettes usage than sociodemographic factors. Daily smoking, parental or household member smoking, peers smoking, ever-use of all tobacco products like snus, and waterpipes were associated with e-cigarette use.

Discussion

As most studies report, male gender, older age, higher amount of pocket money, and tobacco smoking-related characteristics, such as regular and heavier smoking, and having peers who smoke, are the most common trends in characteristics of adolescent e-cigarette users.

The increased prevalence of vaping among males can be due to sociocultural characteristics or marketing messages and current trends. In many cases, males are most likely to be early adopters of technology, having easier access to e-cigarettes and they can also get exposed to e-cigarettes because they represent a newcomer product. Additionally, it was demonstrated that boys’ higher risk of e-cigarette use may exist, partially, due to their lower harm perception. Generally, males tend to appraise lower risk comparative with females and stay away of risky behaviors only when they perceive severe risk.

One might say that the observed frequent use of e-cigarettes in older age is expected since older students are more informed about e-cigarettes, and e-cigarettes are easier to obtain from retail shops and through the internet, given the lack of regulation of age restrictions laws, a situation which is recently being reviewed in numerous countries.

Another characteristic, the observed relationship between higher amount of pocket money and e-cigarette usage may be due to the fact that adolescents can afford to buy e-cigarettes. This characteristic may suggest that having an adequate allowance at the adolescent’s disposal may influence smoking practice, suggesting that guardians, who provide youths with pocket money, should pay attention in how that cash is spend.

Several studies also support the association between vaping and tobacco use related characteristics. Indeed, it has been proposed that e-cigarettes can be used as a method for smoking cessation. However, previous research has shown that vaping among adolescents was faced more for experimentation rather than smoking cessation, and that heavier e-cigarettes smokers are least likely to consider smoking cessation. A great percentage of young vapers had never tried conventional cigarettes, while in other studies e-cigarette ever-use was non-significantly related neither with quit intention nor attempts. On the contrary, among adults, e-cigarettes are seen as a potential cessation aid, while among adolescents who have never before smoked, e-cigarette use is associated with willingness to smoke, and vaping may act as a “one-way bridge” to smoking. Moreover, an association was recently reported between e-cigarette use and initiation or escalation of cigarette smoking. Only in two Korean studies, e-cigarette usage was associated with the desire to quit smoking.

A number of limitations of studies included should be considered in order to allow interpretation of the described findings. Firstly, the cross-sectional design in many studies preclude us from exporting causal inferences about the results; since they can only indicate associations among the studied characteristics but not causality. Secondly, the self-reported assessment could introduce reporting bias. Thirdly, findings may not be generalizable to populations outside of the samples geographical areas or other countries or regions.

It is urgent, moreover, to include e-cigarettes in tobacco prevention programs; targeting in vulnerable groups through early intervention efforts. Given their overwhelming acceptance, prevention campaigns via social media, appear to be an effective mechanism for influencing trends when targeting youth populations. Prospective surveys should be directed toward addressing the potential long-term effects on health and the probable nicotine addiction of consumers. The findings underscore the need of constructing persuasive e-cigarette prevention messages promoting public health welfare.

Author Contributions

EPP contributed in designing and drafting the manuscript, PS contributed in the initial conception and critical revision, EP contributed in the design and interpretation, TC contributed in the interpretation and critical revision, EN contributed in the conception, interpretation, and critical revision. All authors provide their approval for the final version to be published.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 53

  1. 1.

    Pepper JK Brewer NT Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review. Tob Control (2013 ) 23(5):375–84.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051122

  2. 2.

    Yamin CK Bitton A Bates DW. E-cigarettes: a rapidly growing internet phenomenon. Ann Intern Med (2010 ) 153(9):607–10.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-153-9-201011020-00011

  3. 3.

    Benowitz NL Goniewicz ML The regulatory challenge of electronic cigarettes. J Am Med Assoc (2013 ) 310(7):685–6.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2013.109501

  4. 4.

    Kim AE Arnold KY Makarenko O. E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the U.S., 2011-2012. Am J Prev Med (2014 ) 46(4):409–12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.003

  5. 5.

    Schneider S Diehl K. Vaping as a catalyst for smoking? An initial model on the initiation of electronic cigarette use and the transition to tobacco smoking among adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res (2016 ) 18(5):647–53.

    Not in our library10.1093/ntr/ntv193

  6. 6.

    Wang B King BA Corey CG Arrazola RA Johnson SE. Awareness and use of non-conventional tobacco products among U.S. Students, 2012. Am J Prev Med (2014 ) 47(2 Suppl 1):S36–52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.003

  7. 7.

    Murthy VH E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: a major public health concern. JAMA Pediatr (2017 ) 171(3):209–10.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4662

  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Bauld L MacKintosh AM Eastwood B Ford A Moore G Dockrell M Young people’s use of e-cigarettes across the United Kingdom: findings from five surveys 2015-2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2017 ) 14(9):E973.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph14090973

  11. 11.

    Ambrose BK Rostron BL Johnson SE POrtnoy DB Apelberg BJ Kaufman AR Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. Youth. Am J Prev Med (2014 ) 47(2S1):S53–60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.016

  12. 12.

    Goniewicz ML Knysak J Gawron M Kosmider L Sobczak A Kurek J Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control (2014 ) 23(2):133–9.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859

  13. 13.

    Hawkins JD Catalano RF Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull (1992 ) 112(1):64–105.

    Not in our library10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64

  14. 14.

    Kong G Morean ME Cavallo DA Camenga DR Krishnan-Sarin S. Reasons for electronic cigarette experimentation and discontinuation among adolescents and young adults. Nicotine Tob Res (2015 ) 17(7):847–54.

    Not in our library10.1093/ntr/ntu257

  15. 15.

    Grana RA Ling PM “Smoking revolution”: a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. Am J Prev Med (2014 ) 46(4):395–403.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.010

  16. 16.

    Christie D Viner R ABC of adolescence: adolescent development. BMJ (2005 ) 330(7486):301–4.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.330.7486.301

  17. 17.

    Montaño DE Kasprzyk D Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. 5th ed In: Glanz K Rimer BK Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (2015 ). p. 95–124.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Choi K Fabian L Mottey N Corbett A Forster J Young adults’ favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. Am J Public Health (2012 ) 102(11):2088–93.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2011.300525

  19. 19.

    Peters RJ Jr Meshack A Lin MT Hill M Abughosh S. The social norms and beliefs of teenage male electronic cigarette use. J Ethn Subst Abuse (2013 ) 12(4):300–7.

    Not in our library10.1080/15332640.2013.819310

  20. 20.

    Cooper M Case KR Loukas A Creamer MR Perry CL. E-cigarette dual users, exclusive users and perceptions of tobacco products. Am J Health Behav (2016 ) 40(1):108–16.

    Not in our library10.5993/ajhb.40.1.12

  21. 21.

    Kaleta D Wojtysiak P Polańska K. Use of electronic cigarettes among secondary and high school students from a socially disadvantaged rural area in Poland. BMC Public Health (2016 ) 15:703.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-016-3417-y

  22. 22.

    Agaku IT Ayo-Yusuf OA. The effect of exposure to pro-tobacco advertising on experimentation with emerging tobacco products among U.S. adolescents. Health Educ Behav (2014 ) 41(3):275–80.

    Not in our library10.1177/1090198113511817

  23. 23.

    Giovacchini CX Pacek L McClernon FJ Que LG. Use and perceived risk of electronic cigarettes among North Carolina middle and high school students. N C Med J (2017 ) 78(1):7–13.

    Not in our library10.18043/ncm.78.1.7

  24. 24.

    Lee YO Hebert CJ Nonnemaker JM Kim AE Youth tobacco product use in the United States. Pediatrics (2015 ) 135(3):409–15.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2014-3202

  25. 25.

    Khan T Baker DC Quinn CM Huang J Chaloupka FJ Changes in E-Cigarette Availability over Time in the United States: 2010-2012 - A BTG Research Brief. Chicago, IL: Bridging the Gap Program, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago (2014 ). Available from: www.bridgingthegapresearch.org (accessed February 1, 2018)

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Eadie D Stead M MacKintosh AM MacDonald L Purves R Pearce J E-cigarette marketing in UK stores: an observational audit and retailers’ views. BMJ Open (2015 ) 5(9):e008547.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008547

  27. 27.

    Morain SR Malek J Minimum age of sale for tobacco products and electronic cigarettes: ethical acceptability of US “tobacco 21 laws”. Am J Public Health (2017 ) 107(9):1401–5.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2017.303900

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Kinnunen JM Ollila H El-Amin Sel T Pere LA Lindfors PL Rimpelä AH. Awareness and determinants of electronic cigarette use among Finnish adolescents in 2013: a population-based study. Tob Control (2015 ) 24(e4):e264–70.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051512

  30. 30.

    Surís JC Berchtold A Akre C. Reasons to use e-cigarettes and associations with other substances among adolescents in Switzerland. Drug Alcohol Depend (2015 ) 153:140–4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.034

  31. 31.

    Wang MP Ho SY Leung LT Lam TH. Electronic cigarette use and its association with smoking in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Addict Behav (2015 ) 50:124–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.037

  32. 32.

    Park S Lee H Min S. Factors associated with electronic cigarette use among current cigarette-smoking adolescents in the Republic of Korea. Addict Behav (2017 ) 69:22–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.002

  33. 33.

    Hughes K Bellis MA Hardcastle KA McHale P Bennett A Ireland R Associations between e-cigarette access and smoking and drinking behaviours in teenagers. BMC Public Health (2015 ) 15:244.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-015-1618-4

  34. 34.

    Kinnunen JM Ollila H Lindfors PL Rimpelä AH. Changes in electronic cigarette use from 2013 to 2015 and reasons for use among Finnish adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2016 ) 13(11):1114.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph13111114

  35. 35.

    Cooper M Case KR Loukas A. E-cigarette use among Texas youth: results from the 2014 Texas youth tobacco survey. Addict Behav (2015 ) 50:173–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.034

  36. 36.

    Fotiou A Kanavou E Stavrou M Richardson C Kokkevi A. Prevalence and correlates of electronic cigarette use among adolescents in Greece: a preliminary cross-sectional analysis of nationwide survey data. Addict Behav (2015 ) 51:88–92.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.021

  37. 37.

    Morean ME Kong G Camenga DR Cavallo DA Simon P Krishnan-Sarin S. Latent class analysis of current e-cigarette and other substance use in high school students. Drug Alcohol Depend (2016 ) 161:292–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.018

  38. 38.

    Larsen K Faulkner GE Boak A Hamilton HA Mann RE Irving HM Looking beyond cigarettes: are Ontario adolescents with asthma less likely to smoke e-cigarettes, marijuana, waterpipes or tobacco cigarettes? Respir Med (2016 ) 120:10–5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.rmed.2016.09.013

  39. 39.

    Chaffee BW Couch ET Gansky SA. Trends in characteristics and multi-product use among adolescents who use electronic cigarettes, United States 2011-2015. PLoS One (2017 ) 12(5):e0177073.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0177073

  40. 40.

    Miech R Patrick ME O’Malley PM Johnston LD. What are kids vaping? Results from a National Survey of U.S. Adolescents. Tob Control (2017 ) 26(4):386–91.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053014

All 53 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.