Social mechanisms to get people outdoors: bimodal distribution of interest in nature?
Ralf Christopher Buckley, Diane Westaway, Paula Brough
Frontiers in Public Health · 2016
doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00257 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
We report results from a post-program survey (n=930) of participants in a non-profit outdoor health program targeted principally at women with families in Australia’s metropolitan cities. We analyse communications, motivations, experiences, satisfaction and intentions. The program involves three months’ outdoor training in scenic locations, culminating in a single-day event. Training includes social opportunities and peer-group support. Event entry is in teams, and includes charitable fundraising and personal challenges. Drop-out rates are very low, and repeat sign-up high. There are 2000-3000 places per event, and the most recent sold out in <24 hr. We propose that for urban residents of developed nations, individual interest in exposure to nature may be bimodal rather than unimodal. Programs of this type target individuals most likely to shift from low-interest to high-interest mode, using a set of social levers to change attitudes and behaviours. This contrasts with most public outdoor health programs, which assume a unimodal distribution and aim for small lifestyle changes at population scale. We suggest that the bimodal hypothesis is relevant to the sociocultural context of psychosocial interventions in a public health context, and merits direct testing.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Cited by papers we hold1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.