Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Cognition and Pain: A Review

Tanvi Khera, Valluvan Rangasamy

Frontiers in Psychology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673962

Abstract

Cognition is defined as the brain’s ability to acquire, process, store, and retrieve information. Pain has been described as an unpleasant sensory or emotional experience, and for experiencing pain consciously, cognitive processing becomes imperative. Moreover, evaluation of pain strongly depends on cognition as it requires learning and recall of previous experiences. There could be a possible close link between neural systems involved in cognition and pain processing, and studies have reported an association between pain and cognitive impairment. In this narrative review, we explore the available evidence that has investigated cognitive changes associated with pain. We also examine the anatomical, biochemical, and molecular association of pain and neuro-cognition. Additionally, we focus on the cognitive impairment caused by analgesic medications. There is a need to improve our understanding of pathophysiology and cognitive impairment mechanisms associated with chronic pain and its treatment. This area provides a diverse opportunity for grounding future research, aiding institution of timely interventions to prevent chronic pain and associated cognitive decline, ultimately improving patient care.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The multidimensional pain experience is a prevalent complaint in clinical practice and impacts an individual’s physiologic and psychologic states. Pain is classically defined as an unpleasant sensory or emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Thus, pain is a subjective perceptive phenomenon involving cognitive processing rather than a purely sensory phenomenon. Cognition involves the acquisition, processing, storage, and retrieval of information by the brain. Cognition is composed of critical elements such as attention, perception, memory, motor skills, executive functioning, and verbal and language skills. Cognition is a vital component of the subjective perception of pain requiring cognitive-evaluation, learning, recall of past experiences, and active decision making. The key aspects of learning and memory require attention, which is enhanced by adding an emotional component to the process. Multiple cortical and subcortical brain areas are involved in perception, processing, relaying, and pain modulation. Increasing evidence of the close association between neural systems of cognition and pain shows a bi-directional modulatory role.

Observations in the setting of chronic pain (pain persisting longer than 3 months) usually exceed the duration of the noxious stimulus and have deleterious effects on the psychosocial elements of the individual. Although chronic pain has long been shown to alter cognitive outcomes, emerging studies over the past decade have drawn particular attention to the multi-dimensional effects of pain on various cognitive domains. Apart from the psycho-social influences of pain, it can also impact the functional domains and the quality of life in general. Further, chronic pain’s economic impact costs $635 billion annually in direct medical costs, loss of productivity, and disability programs. Thus, evaluating the relationship between cognition and pain is critical to understanding chronic pain syndromes, their associations with comorbidities, and their psychosocial impact for ultimately improving therapeutic targets and patient outcomes.

In this narrative review, we explore the available evidence and summarize the existing literature on the effects of pain on various cognitive changes. We also examine the anatomical, biochemical and molecular association of pain and neuro-cognition. Additionally, we focus on the cognitive impairment caused by analgesic medications. We highlight the need to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology and the mechanisms of cognitive impairment associated with chronic pain and the treatment thereof.

Anatomy and Neurophysiology of Pain

Understanding the association between neural systems involved in pain and cognition is central to deciphering the relationship between these two entities. At the most basic level, the pain pathway consists of (1) Transduction, (2) Transmission, (3) Modulation, and (4) Perception.

Noxious stimuli are transduced via a series of specialized nociceptors into a recognizable signal, transmitted through Aδ (touch, temperature), and C fibers (pain). Most sensory fibers would then project to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), from where the sensory input is transmitted to the central nervous system (CNS; ). In the event of persistent noxious stimulation, there is an upregulation of A-fibers to perceive pain in addition to C fibers; this is responsible for central sensitization leading to hyperalgesia.

Primarily, C fibers contribute to modulation at the level of DRG by regulating the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor configuration and sensitivity. An additional modulation of the ascending pain occurs at the spinal cord level through the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Functional loss of the lamina II has been implicated in the development of chronic neuropathic pain.

The spinothalamic tracts transmitting pain and temperature sensations run along the ventrolateral spinal cord to the ventral posterior nucleus and the central nucleus of the thalamus. Later, the thalamic projections relay to brainstem reticular formation, hypothalamus, and higher cortical centers. These projections to the reticular formation, periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), and the medial thalamic nuclei are important components of motivational and affective domains of pain. The thalamic reorganization is an essential pathway for the development of central pain and neuropathic pain. There is an extensive cortical neural circuitry involved in the perception, localization, and modulation of painful stimuli. This network mostly consists of medial and lateral pain systems. The median system consists of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the insular cortices, and the lateral system consisting of primary (SI) and the secondary somatosensory (SII) cortices. Other cortical areas involved in pain perception are the ventrolateral orbital cortex and the motor cortex.

The descending pain pathway comprises various supraspinal components – the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), the dorsolateral pontomesencephalic tegmentum, and the PAG. The PAG-RVM-DH (Dorsal horn) pathway is called the descending pain modulatory pathway. In the limbic system, amygdala is associated with the emotional-affective component of pain and modulation thereof. It is activated in response to noxious stimuli, thus lending the amygdala’s central nucleus the name “nociceptive amygdala”. The interconnection between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, and the cortico-limbic reverberating loops is implicated in chronic pain conditions such as chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), chronic pelvic pain. Monoamines, serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and norepinephrine (NE) help with modulation of the descending pathway by predominantly acting on lamina I and II of the spinal cord. Dysregulated descending modulation plays a vital role in chronic pain conditions Figure 1.

Neuroplasticity and Chronic Pain

Neuroplasticity includes the structural and functional changes that occur in the brain enabling adaptation to environmental cues, learning, memory, and rehabilitation after brain injury. In fact, it is the neurochemical basis of memory formation. Neuroplasticity in the context of pain refers to the changes that alter an individual’s response to pain by the development of either chronic pain or hypersensitivity. Neuroplastic adaptations of the brain to chronic pain lead to modulation of cognitive domains, affecting the pain perception.

Imaging studies have suggested a spatiotemporal reorganization of brain activity in relation to chronic pain, during which the representation of pain gradually shifts from sensory to emotional and limbic structures. Thus, the transition of acute pain to chronic pain is a type of activity-induced plasticity of the limbic-cortical circuitry resulting in the reorganization of the neocortex. Evidence suggests the relationship of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the cortico-limbic interaction for modulation of response at the amygdala level. This may offer novel techniques for the control of pain by engaging mPFC control of the amygdala. There is an inter-individual difference in the encoding of painful stimuli and generation of memory for these experiences. This inter-individual difference is based on how the noxious versus the innocuous stimuli are handled and shaped by the individual’s anxiety level. The medial thalamus and ACC are responsible for encoding the stimuli as painful, and the somatosensory cortex discerns non-painful stimuli. This encoding process is also associated with enhanced functional connectivity between the thalamus and the mPFC and is essential to the affective component of pain perception and memory formation.

Various neurotrophic factors, neuro-modulatory lipids, and neuropeptides are implicated in the development of plasticity. Neuropeptides such as NE, DA, and 5-HT are essential in modulating descending pain signals and the affective component of pain, which is often linked to depression. Similarly, brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF) are associated with the development of synaptic plasticity and de novo neurogenesis throughout the peripheral and central pain circuits. Decreased BDNF levels at the hippocampus are found in chronic pain conditions, and this finding is positively linked to the development of depression-like symptoms.

A classic example of neuroplasticity in chronic pain setting is neuropathic phantom limb pain. Its central pathophysiology involves the complex interaction of cortical elements, memory, and pain perception. Modalities such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) have shown positive effects in the treatment of neuropathic pain, reinforcing the role of cognition, and cortical perception in the pathophysiology of pain.

Repetitive noxious stimuli often lead to the development of a maladaptive change at the CNS level. This maladaptive change, called the “wind-up phenomenon” or central sensitization, is responsible for developing chronic intractable pain or non-responsive pain. This manifests either as hyperalgesia or allodynia. Hyperalgesia, where mildly noxious stimuli are perceived as painful due to resetting of the peripheral nerve threshold. Whereas, in allodynia, there is a recruitment of nerves that carry non-noxious impulses to pain-sensing neurons. Thus, a non-noxious stimulus is perceived as a noxious stimulus in allodynia. Additionally, the spontaneous firing of the DRG may add to the wind-up phenomenon. When sensory stimuli act on modified central neural mechanisms, the output is influenced by the memory of these painful stimuli. The pre-emptive analgesia concept focuses on preventing the wind-up phenomenon. This is often achieved by blocking the peripheral transmission of pain by local anesthetics and central perception by using opioids and NMDA receptor antagonists. There is growing interest in the use of preemptive analgesics in the surgical context. However, various authors have conflicting opinions about the use of preemptive analgesics for surgical patients.

Clinical Evidence for Pain and Cognition

A bi-directional relationship exists between cognition and pain. Disruption of cognitive processing has been investigated in various common chronic pain syndromes, with studies focusing on several cognitive output types. Fibromyalgia, migraine, chronic back pain, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, osteoarthritis, CRPS, peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes, and multiple sclerosis have been the focus of most clinical studies. Major cognitive parameters investigated encompass attention, learning, memory, sustained concentration, processing speed, psychomotor ability, and executive function Figure 2.

The methodologies employed in these studies comprise a battery of tests, which typically include pain questionnaires such as numerical rating scales, visual analog scales, or McGill pain questionnaire to measure pain, coupled with tests of cognition. Cognitive function may be assessed using subjective self-report measures or objectively with formal, empirically validated neuropsychological tests focusing on one or more aspects of cognition. To provide objectivity to the diagnosis, predicting therapeutic benefits of individualized interventions for chronic pain, the use of fMRI signatures is being investigated. This neural circuit potentially includes the thalamus, anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, and PAG. Analyzing the change in these signatures over time and with treatment can help pave way for personalized medicine in the future. Comorbid affective disorders (such as depression and anxiety) and the effects of sleep disturbance and medication use are sometimes, but not always, considered, and they present an interesting dichotomy in the experimental approach.

Attention

Attention is the individual’s capacity to process information and involves focused or directed consciousness. A diffuse system of interconnected neurons controls attention at the most fundamental level called the attention matrix. This system receives intrinsic and extrinsic sensory input continually, ultimately impacting the functional adaptations. Attention is a function of cortical and subcortical gray matter structures globally, with interconnected white matter tracts. The frontal lobe and inputs from a widespread network of thalamic and bihemispheric structures are the essential component of the attention neural networks. There is an overlap between the pain pathways and attention matrix, which makes the study of attention in pain and the modulation particularly interesting. suggested that continued painful stimuli impact attentional control mechanisms required to remove task-irrelevant stimuli, resulting in decreased task performance. In experimental studies, attention is evaluated based on attention span, attention switching between ≥2 cognitive tasks, and divided attention, which studies the ability to process >1 source of information simultaneously.

Young adults and middle-aged adults can use cognitively demanding tasks to diverge their attention and self-manage pain to some extent. Pain sensitivity is decreased with engagement in attention requiring tasks and with the use of environmental distractors. However, older adults are limited in this capacity, and chronic pain can impair independent living, a risk factor for physical disability, hospitalization, and death. Comorbidities such as depression and anxiety can impact both the perception of pain and attention. Thus, chronic pain patients, especially in the older age group with coexisting conditions, require special care in the clinical setting.

Clinical studies over the past decade have shown that there is an increased incidence of patient-reported attention deficits with chronic pain. The majority of the studies found no association between age, gender, pain-chronicity, anxiety, depression, medication, site of pain, and cognitive performance. Interestingly, recent studies show decreased accuracy on attentional switching and divided attention tasks in patients with fibromyalgia. Animal models used to study the impact of pain on attention and learned behavior (operant nose poke tests) shows increased omissions and decreased accuracy in experimentally induced inflammatory pain. Due to heterogeneity in the chronic pain syndrome type, pain scales used, and cognitive tests for assessment of attention, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions.

Memory

Conceptually, memory consists of a succession of storage systems essential for information flow from the environment to a short-term memory store, which then feeds long-term memory. The information about the environmental cues passes temporary sensory buffers en-route, which are essentially part of perceptual processes. Working memory is a subset of memory which controls this flow of information in and out of the long-term memory, thus playing an essential role in learning and cognition. The hippocampus is associated with long-term explicit memory formation and handling emotional stressors. Human and animal studies show a decreased hippocampal volume and structural and biochemical plasticity in the setting of chronic pain. Amygdala is another critical brain region for learning. The basolateral amygdala is activated in the presence of glucocorticoid, which impacts memory consolidation. Furthermore, working memory performance and retrieval are impaired with high glucocorticoid levels. Involvement of the amygdala in chronic pain has now been shown in human studies and animal models for chronic pain, eliciting the influence of dorsal horn (DH) neuron excitation and the interaction between the amygdala and the mPFC.

Studies over the past have demonstrated that chronic pain adversely affects working memory, recall, and recognition memory. Most patients with chronic pain report poor memory, recall, and concentration in their daily activities. Interestingly, implicit memory (semantic, procedural, and conditioned) is less likely to be affected by pain owing to its automated nature. Additionally, most studies concluded that patients with pain have deficits in general and specialized cognitive screening measures. It is still unclear whether the intensity and nature of chronic pain syndrome impact semantic memory, immediate or delayed verbal memory, recognition memory, visuospatial memory, and long-term memory. Several groups have modeled pain-related cognitive impairment in animal models and demonstrated poor performance on delayed non-matching to position lever press tasks and delayed novel object recognition. They describe this decreased accuracy, increased response latency for cognitively challenging tasks as the negative effects of pain on spatial learning, recognition, and memory. Neuropathic rat models are being analyzed to investigate the role of novel molecular therapeutic targets for chronic pain.

Processing, Executive Functioning, and Decision Making

Executive function is a set of neurological processes that assist with complex cognitive functions such as planning, organization, thought control, self-regulation, goal-directed actions, initiation, and analyses of actions. Emotional decision-making requires higher executive functioning. Anatomically, executive functioning is a higher mental function regulated by the frontal lobes, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC), ACC, orbitofrontal cortex. There is a functional overlap in the pathways in the brain responsible for executive functioning and pain perception. Gray matter reduction is implicated in age-related cognitive decline and an impaired executive functioning and decreased processing speed. These age-related gray matter changes are expedited in chronic pain syndromes. ACC, IC, and the DLPC are decreased in volume in patients with chronic pain. Since these areas are also part of the pain neuromatrix, loss of these areas correlates with changes in cognitive executive functioning, and processing speed.

Perception, processing speed, executive functioning, and decision making are studied in patients with chronic pain and have demonstrated that pain adversely affects perceptual learning and emotional decision making. Patients with pain often show greater harm avoidance, but there is no impact on overall cognition in this subset. The type of chronic pain defines the impact on executive functioning. While it is impacted in FM, no correlation is noted in neuropathies and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Interestingly, emotional decision-making is more significantly impacted in patients with chronic lower back pain than CPRS. It is still unclear whether the intensity and nature of the chronic pain syndrome impacts processing speed and attentional interference tasks. Animal models for inflammatory pain show impaired emotional decision-making on rodent gambling tasks.

Psychomotor Efficiency and Reaction Time

Clinical studies in patients with chronic pain such as neuropathies have demonstrated that pain adversely impacts performance and psychomotor efficiency, and verbal reaction time. The number of pain sites and neuropathy duration is also positively correlated to psychomotor efficiency. It is still unclear whether the intensity and nature of chronic pain syndrome impact motor skills latency and amplitude. The measure of psychomotor efficiency has been most extensively studied and reported in patients with neuropathies, making the generalizability of this observation over different pain cohorts difficult.

Pharmacological Therapies

Management of chronic pain remains a challenge for healthcare professionals. Apart from the treatment of inflammation using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, routinely used modalities for pain control target the sensory component of pain. The targets comprise of control of pain transmission [opioids and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)] and modulation of neuronal excitability (opioids, anticonvulsants) Figure 1.

Opioid receptors are uniquely present at all the neural loci associated with pain signaling and perception. The opioid system is well-positioned in the brain network to modify the perception of pain. This includes somatosensory neurons of the DRG, excitatory interneurons, and lamina I neurons that relay information to the thalamus and the PAG. The non-linearity of the intensity of the painful stimulus and the perception of pain result from the neural input from the sensory, emotional, interoceptive, inferential, and cognitive information. In the descending pain pathway, opioids act on the PAG, RVM, and spinal cord to modify the nociceptive input perception. Opioid analgesics also act at the level of the rostral, subcortical, and cortical sites, causing an analgesic impact by altering the body’s affective and somatic responses.

Opioids have unique problems, including constipation, diarrhea, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Having said that, opioids remain the most preferred analgesic in the setting of chronic pain because of their high potency. Often patients on long-term therapy develop tolerance to the opioid medication, and higher doses are required to achieve the same therapeutic benefit. However, higher mean opioid consumption worsens distinct cognitive domains, in particular attention, language, orientation, and psychomotor function. Periodically follow-up with patients on chronic pain medications is essential to diagnose subtle cognition changes. That said, the critical prespecified adverse events related to opioids, including addiction, depression, and particularly cognitive decline, are often not reported. Evidence suggests that children born to opioid-dependent mothers tend to have a higher incidence of developing cognitive dysfunction, psychomotor disturbance, attention problems, and overall lower IQ as they grow up. Opioid-induced decreases in arousal are caused by blockage of cholinergic arousal projections from the brainstem to the thalamus and the cortex. Recent studies show a decrease in the gray matter volume and bilateral amygdalar modulation even with once-daily administration of morphine for 1 month. Mu opioid receptor and kappa-opioid receptor agonists have been shown to affect normal cognitive function; there is increased psychomotor retardation, decreased accuracy, and impaired recall. This bidirectional impact of pain and cognition has allowed researchers to test opioid antagonists as a potential cognitive-enhancing drug.

Although opioids, TCAs, and anticonvulsant therapies inherently impact the cognitive domains, this impact is inconsistently observed over human and animal studies. The majority of human studies suggest a decrease in attention, processing, memory encoding and retrieval, reaction time, and psychomotor performance with the use of opioids, TCAs, and anticonvulsants. However, evidence from some human studies and animal models is equivocal. Thus, analgesics in chronic pain and cognition studies can be a potential confounder that cannot be effectively controlled due to ethical reasons.

Endocannabinoids (ECs) are the in-built antinociceptive system of the body. Current research focuses on understanding this EC system better and maximizing its potential to provide safer pain control. The major areas of interest include – EC metabolism inhibition, Anandamide (AEA), and 1-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) are the earliest recognized EC ligands in the body. ECs, AEA, and 2-AG, along with their enzyme modulators, fatty acid amide hydrolase and monoacylglycerol lipase, are essential components for modulation of pain perception and target of most therapeutic interventions. Even though preclinical evidence suggests the role of opioid transmitters in causing cognitive decline, there is not enough evidence to indicate the role of ECs as a potential to decrease cognitive abilities. There is a growing interest in exploring the benefit of cannabis-derived products for managing chronic persistent pain. However, it has been shown in recent studies that cannabis products increase the risk of depression and anxiety in adults experiencing chronic pain. Thus, individualizing the analgesic therapy (type and dose) based on the patient’s profile is essential for preventing pain and pain-related cognitive decline.

Non- pharmacological Therapies

Opioids are potent analgesics, however, considering their unique side effect profile and evidence of an emerging opioid epidemic, alternative non-pharmacological therapies are now being explored. Sensory processing of signals can be modulated by altering the attention component of cognitive processing. Modulation of the central sensory processing was successfully investigated by measuring regional cerebral blood flow with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) based technique during cognitively challenging tasks and with a painful stimulus. Neuroimaging studies PET and fMRI have shown a decreased pain perception with simple distraction techniques. This finding points toward the phenomenon of cortical suppression of pain in the presence of a cognitively challenging task. There were an observable increased signal intensity and activation of the cingulo-frontal cortex, including the orbitofrontal and perigenual ACC, as well as PAG and the posterior thalamus. This phenomenon is being translated into clinical practice by using innovative techniques such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) as a clinical tool for the management of pain.

Cognitive behavior therapy refers to the psychotherapeutic techniques used to decrease pain perception. Traditionally, it includes relaxation therapy, activity pacing, sleep hygiene, scheduling pleasant activity, identifying and modifying cognitive distortions. CBT has also shown promise in preventing acute pain conversion to chronic pain. Pain catastrophizing is a response style that impacts the outcomes of chronic pain patients. Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive change, and patients often view pain as uncontrollable, permanent, and destructive. CBT is a vital treatment modality for this class of chronic pain patients. Evidence in fibromyalgia patients suggests the clinical benefits of CBT in reducing pain catastrophizing. Newer CBT methods, such as dialectic pain management (DPM), are being employed to improve and respond to chronic pain therapy. DPM skill group sessions include a dialectic integration of change with acceptance to the present moment; this construct is further strengthened with mindfulness practices. Emotions, vulnerabilities, self-compassion, motivation, invalidation, and interpersonal effectiveness, and other personal challenges are addressed that commonly impact chronic pain patients. Not just chronic pain, but therapies like acupuncture, hypnosis, mindfulness, relaxation, VR, and AR-based delivery system are being utilized for inpatient and outpatient acute pain such as headache, migraine, and pain in acute and emergency setting. As a complementary procedure, acupuncture provides therapeutic benefits by increasing pain thresholds and insular activation.

Mindfulness meditation and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy have shown therapeutic benefit and improved sensitivity to opioid-based treatment in patients with chronic lower back pain. Mindfulness-based practices focus on altering the pain catastrophizing, which is an essential component of non-pharmacological therapies for chronic pain. It alters the cognitive content, processing, and negative affectivity, thus leading to a shift critical for any treatment efficacy. Other theoretical models hypothesize that mindful meditation can restructure the pain-related cognitive content, making adaptive changes necessary to counter pain perception. Studies have shown an increase in the EC levels even after short-term meditation practice, providing evidence of the analgesic potential of mind-body therapies. Understanding and individualizing the treatment and matching it to the patient’s requirement can improve treatment response, adherence, and outcomes. Considering at-home practices and online modules can improve reach and compliance with mindfulness-based therapies.

Future Directions

Clinical and preclinical studies indicate a definitive link between pain and cognitive domains. However, the precise underlying psychological and neural mechanisms, the cognitive deficit associated with each chronic pain condition, and the role of subjective factors, the nature and the duration of the pain are yet to be elucidated. Chronic pain also results in adaptations and alterations in cognitive strategies, further adding to the heterogeneity in interpreting the primary deficit. Neuroplasticity-based reorganizational changes have an essential role in pain permanence and pain modulation and should be considered during the interpretation of the findings.

Lack of consistent cognitive effects across studies, methods, and pain conditions highlight the need for more standardized evaluation methods to allow comparisons to identify global and precise cognitive deficits. The use of different batteries of neurocognitive tests and pain questionnaires prevent a head-on comparison between different chronic pain conditions and their impact on the cognitive domains. The tests should have the sensitivity to identify the intensity of pain and the effect of pain on various cognitive domains. These limitations and the complex nature of the interconnection between pain and cognitive neuro-matrix makes evaluative conclusions rather difficult. Future studies should be designed to address these issues. Furthermore, current research lacks evidence to draw inference for longer-term impacts on cognition in patients with chronic pain. Chronic pain-based animal models have been used to understand the implication of pain on long term cognitive domains; however, these models are limited in their ability to mimic the motivation-affective and evaluative aspects of pain.

Future studies should be modified to incorporate psychophysiological, psychophysical, pharmacological, and brain imaging techniques to evaluate cognitive effects in the setting of chronic pain. Such studies would provide a multidimensional understanding of cognitive effects and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms and outcomes of pharmacotherapy. The current knowledge paves the way for future research to understand better the cognitive domains and their connection with various pain dimensions to improve therapeutic management and avoid unfavorable cognitive outcomes.

Conclusion

The past two decades have provided tremendous insights into the multifaceted role of pain in modulating cognitive domains and vice versa. This comprehensive review focused on the multidimensional role of pain in several cognitive domains including attention, memory, processing, executive functioning, decision making, psychomotor efficiency and reaction time highlights the current understanding of the intricate association between pain and cognition. We also provided insights into the role of various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches in the management of pain and the cognitive implications associated with it. It is imperative to understand the precise nature of the cognitive task affected by chronic pain. This understanding is crucial to tailor pain management therapy to the requirement of the individual. This personalized multimodal pain management allows improvement in long term quality of life and facilitates recovery.

Author Contributions

TK and VR: involve in the planning, critical thinking, and writing the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 135

  1. 1.

    Al Mahrouqi M. M. MacDonald D. A. Vicenzino B. Smith M. D. (2020 ). Quality of life, function and disability in individuals with chronic ankle symptoms: a cross-sectional online survey. J. Foot Ankle Res. 13:67.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13047-020-00432-w

  2. 2.

    Alemanno F. Houdayer E. Emedoli D. Locatelli M. Mortini P. Mandelli C. (2019 ). Efficacy of virtual reality to reduce chronic low back pain: proof-of-concept of a non-pharmacological approach on pain, quality of life, neuropsychological and functional outcome. PLoS One 14:e0216858.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0216858

  3. 3.

    Anand K. J. S. Willson D. F. Berger J. Harrison R. Meert K. L. Zimmerman J. (2010 ). Tolerance and withdrawal from prolonged opioid use in critically ill children. Pediatrics 125 e1208–e1225.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2009-0489

  4. 4.

    Antepohl W. Kiviloog L. Andersson J. Gerdle B. (2003 ). Cognitive impairment in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder–a matched control study. Neurorehabilitation 18 307–315.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Apkarian V. A. Sosa Y. Krauss B. R. Thomas S. P. Fredrickson B. E. Levy R. E. (2004 ). Chronic pain patients are impaired on an emotional decision-making task. Pain 108 129–136.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.015

  6. 6.

    Baddeley A. (2010 ). Working memory. Curr. Biol. 20 R136–R140.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014

  7. 7.

    Barnhart W. R. Buelow M. T. Trost Z. (2019 ). Effects of acute pain and pain-related fear on risky decision-making and effort during cognitive tests. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 41 1033–1047.

    Not in our library10.1080/13803395.2019.1646711

  8. 8.

    Barrett D. Brintz C. E. Zaski A. M. Edlund M. J. (2020 ). Dialectical pain management: feasibility of a hybrid third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy approach for adults receiving opioids for chronic pain. Pain Med. [Epub ahead of print].

    Not in our library10.1093/pm/pnaa361

  9. 9.

    Basbaum A. I. Bautista D. M. Scherrer G. Julius D. (2009 ). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell 139 267–284.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028

  10. 10.

    Benyamin R. Trescot A. M. Datta S. Buenaventura R. Adlaka R. Sehgal N. (2008 ). Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 11(2 Suppl.), S105–S120.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Berryman C. Stanton T. R. Jane Bowering K. Tabor A. McFarlane A. Lorimer Moseley G. (2013 ). Evidence for working memory deficits in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 154 1181–1196.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.002

  12. 12.

    Bourne S. Machado A. G. Nagel S. J. (2014 ). Basic anatomy and physiology of pain pathways. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 25 629–638.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nec.2014.06.001

  13. 13.

    Boyette-Davis J. A. Thompson C. D. Fuchs P. N. (2008 ). Alterations in attentional mechanisms in response to acute inflammatory pain and morphine administration. Neuroscience 151 558–563.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.032

  14. 14.

    Brown E. N. Pavone K. J. Naranjo M. (2018 ). Multimodal general anesthesia: theory and practice. Anesth. Analg. 127 1246–1258.

    Not in our library10.1213/ane.0000000000003668

  15. 15.

    Calandre E. P. Bembibre J. Arnedo M. L. Becerra D. (2002 ). Cognitive disturbances and regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in migraine patients: their relationship with the clinical manifestations of the illness. Cephalalgia 22 291–302.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00370.x

  16. 16.

    Cao J. Tu Y. Orr S. P. Lang C. Park J. Vangel M. (2019 ). analgesic effects evoked by real and imagined acupuncture: a neuroimaging study. Cereb. Cortex 29 3220–3231.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhy190

  17. 17.

    Casey K. L. Lorenz J. (2000 ). The determinants of pain revisited: coordinates in sensory space. Pain Res. Manage. 5 197–204.

    Not in our library10.1155/2000/586814

  18. 18.

    Ceko M. Bushnell M. C. Fitzcharles M.-A. Schweinhardt P. (2013 ). Fibromyalgia interacts with age to change the brain. Neuroimage Clin. 3 249–260.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.015

  19. 19.

    Cherrier M. M. Amory J. K. Ersek M. Risler L. Shen D. D. (2009 ). Comparative cognitive and subjective side effects of immediate-release oxycodone in healthy middle-aged and older adults. J. Pain 10 1038–1050.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.017

  20. 20.

    Chuan A. Zhou J. J. Hou R. M. Stevens C. J. Bogdanovych A. (2020 ). Virtual reality for acute and chronic pain management in adult patients: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 76 695–704.

    Not in our library10.1111/anae.15202

  21. 21.

    Corder G. Castro D. C. Bruchas M. R. Scherrer G. (2018 ). Endogenous and exogenous opioids in pain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 41 453–473.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-0-61522

  22. 22.

    Cousins S. Ridsdale L. Goldstein L. H. Noble A. J. Moorey S. Seed P. (2015 ). A pilot study of cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation for migraine headache: a randomised controlled trial. J. Neurol. 262 2764–2772.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00415-015-7916-z

  23. 23.

    Curatolo M. La Bianca G. Cosentino G. Baschi R. Salemi G. Talotta R. (2017 ). Motor cortex tRNS improves pain, affective and cognitive impairment in patients with fibromyalgia: preliminary results of a randomised sham-controlled trial. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 35 (Suppl. 105), 100–105.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Day M. A. Ward L. C. Ehde D. M. Thorn B. E. Burns J. Barnier A. (2019 ). A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain. Pain Med. 20 2134–2148.

    Not in our library10.1093/pm/pny273

  25. 25.

    Day M. A. Ward L. C. Thorn B. E. Burns J. Ehde D. M. Barnier A. J. (2020 ). Mechanisms of mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain. Clin. J. Pain 36 740–749.

    Not in our library10.1097/ajp.0000000000000862

  26. 26.

    Devane W. A. Breuer A. Sheskin T. Järbe T. U. Eisen M. S. Mechoulam R. (1992 ). A novel probe for the cannabinoid receptor. J. Med. Chem. 35 2065–2069.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm00089a018

  27. 27.

    Dick B. D. Rashiq S. (2007 ). Disruption of attention and working memory traces in individuals with chronic pain. Anesth. Analg. 104 1223–1229.

    Not in our library10.1213/01.ane.0000263280.49786.f5

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Dufton B. D. (1989 ). Cognitive failure and chronic pain. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 19 291–297.

    Not in our library10.2190/jdjk-0795-5bfl-5n6k

  30. 30.

    Duric V. McCarson K. E. (2006 ). Persistent pain produces stress-like alterations in hippocampal neurogenesis and gene expression. J. Pain 7 544–555.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.458

  31. 31.

    Els C. Jackson T. D. Kunyk D. Lappi V. G. Sonnenberg B. Hagtvedt R. (2017 ). Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10:CD012509.

    Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd012509.pub2

  32. 32.

    Emerson N. M. Meeker T. J. Greenspan J. D. Saffer M. I. Campbell C. M. Korzeniewska A. (2020 ). Missed targets, reaction times, and arousal are related to trait anxiety and attention to pain during an experimental vigilance task with a painful target. J. Neurophysiol. 123 462–472.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.00331.2019

  33. 33.

    Filley C. M. (2002 ). The Neuroanatomy of Attention. Semin. Speech Lang. 23 089–098.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-2002-24985

  34. 34.

    Gellman M. Rick Turner J. (eds) (2013 ). Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York, NY: Springer.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9

  35. 35.

    Gil-Gouveia R. Oliveira A. G. Martins I. P. (2015 ). Cognitive dysfunction during migraine attacks: a study on migraine without aura. Cephalalgia 35 662–674.

    Not in our library10.1177/0333102414553823

  36. 36.

    Gilliam W. P. Schumann M. E. Cunningham J. L. Evans M. M. Luedtke C. A. Morrison E. J. (2020 ). Pain catastrophizing as a treatment process variable in cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with chronic pain. Eur. J. Pain 25 339–347.

    Not in our library10.1002/ejp.1671

  37. 37.

    Glare P. Overton S. Aubrey K. (2020 ). Transition from acute to chronic pain: Where cells, systems and society meet. Pain Manage. 10 421–436.

    Not in our library10.2217/pmt-2019-0039

  38. 38.

    Gottin L. Finco G. Polati E. Bartoloni A. Zanoni L. Bianchin E. (1995 ). [The pre-emptive analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain]. Chir. Ital. 47 12–19.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Grisart J. M. Van der Linden M. (2001 ). Conscious and automatic uses of memory in chronic pain patients. Pain 94 305–313.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00366-9

  40. 40.

    Gulyaeva N. V. (2017 ). Molecular mechanisms of neuroplasticity: an expanding universe. Biochemistry 82 237–242.

    Not in our library10.1134/s0006297917030014

All 135 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.