Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Reduced Sensitivity to Between-Category Information but Preserved Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones in Tone Language Speakers With Congenital Amusia

Fei Chen, Fei Chen, Gang Peng and 1 more

Frontiers in Psychology · 2020

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581410 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that for congenital amusics, long-term tone language experience cannot compensate for lexical tone processing deficits. However, it is still unknown whether such deficits are merely caused by domain-transferred deficits in lower-level acoustic processing and/or by higher-level phonological processing of linguistic pitch as well. The current P300 study links and extends previous studies by uncovering the neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning lexical tone perception deficits in Mandarin-speaking amusics. The results suggest that regardless of the linguistic status of the signal, acoustic pitch processing deficits in amusics are manifested profoundly and further persist into the higher-level phonological processing that involves the neural processing of different lexical tone categories. Our findings indicate that long-term tone language experience may not compensate for the acoustic pitch processing deficit in tone language speakers with amusia but rather may extend to the neural processing of the phonological information of lexical tones during the attentive stage. However, from both the behavioral and neural evidence, it seems that the basic categorical perception (CP) pattern of native lexical tones is preserved in Mandarin-speaking amusics, indicating that they may have normal or near normal long-term categorical memory.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References86

  1. 18.

39 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 86 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.