Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Mindfulness, Age and Gender as Protective Factors Against Psychological Distress During COVID-19 Pandemic

Ciro Conversano, Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe, Mario Miccoli and 3 more

Frontiers in Psychology · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01900

Abstract

Objective. Mindfulness disposition is associated with various psychological factors and prevents emotional distress in chronic diseases. In the present study, we analyzed the key role of mindfulness dispositions in protecting the individual against psychological distress consequent to COVID-19 social distancing and quarantining.

Methods. An online survey was launched on March 13, 2020, with 6,412 responses by April 6, 2020. Socio-demographic information, exposure to the pandemic, and quarantining were assessed together with psychological distress and mindfulness disposition. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to study the influence of predictive factors on psychological distress and quality of life in Italian responders during the early days of lockdown. Pearson correlations were calculated to study the relationship between mindfulness and psychiatric symptoms.

Results. Multivariate linear regression run on socio-demographics, COVID-19-related variables, and mindfulness disposition as moderators of overall psychological distress showed that mindfulness was the best predictor of psychological distress (β = −0.504; p < 0.0001). High negative correlations were found between mindfulness disposition and the overall Global Severity Index (r = −0.637; p < 0.0001), while moderate to high associations were found between mindfulness and all SCL-90 sub-scales.

Discussion. Findings showed that high dispositional mindfulness enhances well-being and helps in dealing with stressful situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Mindfulness-based mental training could represent an effective intervention to stem post-traumatic psychopathological beginnings and prevent the onset of chronic mental disorders.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The current global COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted mental health worldwide. In order to respond most effectively to this emergency, an immediate international response from mental health professionals is needed. Researchers across the world are promptly trying to address this issue by screening the psychological impact of social distancing and quarantining. Results from early studies using social media like Twitter and Weibo data have found that posts related to negative emotions and sensitivity to social risks have greatly increased during lockdown. Consistent with these findings, another study on the psychological impact of COVID-19 among Italians during the first week of lockdown has found that 40% of participants reported high psychological distress and about 30% showed clinically significant post-traumatic symptoms. Conversely, adaptive defensive functioning has been found associated with better adjustment and fewer post-traumatic symptoms. In the present study, we have analyzed the impact of mindfulness dispositions as a protective factor against psychological distress.

In reference to the so-called protective factors in a lowered stress impact perspective, the literature identifies some human abilities already described in ancient times (i.e., Buddhism and other contemplative traditions), which may represent some valid tools in dealing with stress. These abilities may vary from different cognitive processes such as attention, memory, and thought. One of these cognitive processes may be represented by mindfulness, the experience of awareness which is activated by purposely paying attention to what occurs in the present, with a non-judgmental attitude. In other words, mindfulness may be defined as a process involving attention, awareness, and an open-minded acceptance of the present moment; it concerns the quality of consciousness itself and it is not identified with reflective thought but “offers a bare display of what is taking place” in the moment of observation (, p. 204).

Many researchers, in the last 30 years, have studied this human ability, identifying its intrinsic nature in the human being and its possible enhancement through environmental and behavioral training. To date, this mindfulness ability seems to be related to other psychological constructs such as emotional intelligence, vivid perception, receptive attention, personality traits, and defense mechanisms. Mindfulness has also been proven to represent a good predictor of depression, anxiety, stress, and well-being in association with self-compassion, self-efficacy, and gender. Dispositional mindfulness has the potential to be used as treatment for stress-related and other mental health disorders and is effective in the enhancement of immune function and self-regulation, through the training of attention control, emotion regulation, and self-awareness. Interestingly, similar findings were shown in recent studies concerning the key role of defense mechanisms and related psychological functions in chronic illness. In particular, mood disorders seem to negatively affect physical and psychological response to treatment in chronic patients. Recent studies demonstrated that mindfulness disposition is related to anxiety and depression and this is observable among different clinical populations. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed significant beneficial effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients treated with mindfulness-based interventions.

As regards the measurement of mindfulness levels, there are different validated tools available for scientific research, each of which focuses on different operational definitions. The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS; ) is a psychological instrument to assess the presence or absence of attention to and awareness of what is occurring in the present moment for the participants. It focuses on the above-mentioned core characteristic of mindfulness, which has a dispositional quality. From the validation study of the MAAS, this unique quality of consciousness seems to be related to, and predictive of, a variety of self-regulation and well-being constructs such as optimism, satisfaction, vitality, and self-esteem, and negatively correlated with anxiety, depression, impulsiveness, and self -monitoring.

In the present study, regarding the Italian population during the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to (1) identify individuals at higher risk for psychological distress while measuring the weight of mindfulness disposition in protecting their mental health and (2) assess the relationship between mindfulness and several psychiatric symptoms of distress. Regarding the first hypothesis, we expected that socio-demographic characteristics and lockdown duration would negatively affect psychological well-being, while higher mindfulness would lower the levels of distress. Regarding the second hypothesis, we expected that higher mindfulness disposition would be associated with lower self-rated psychiatric symptoms and lower overall psychological distress.

Participants

From March 13 to April 6, 2020, we collected 6,412 responses from people living in Italy to an online survey about the psychological impact of COVID-19 during the lockdown. Responders were mostly middle-aged adults between 30 and 50 years old, while approximately 33 and 27% were younger and older, respectively. Most of the sample was represented by females, living with close relatives, without children (see Table 1 for descriptive statistics). Participants prevalently came from Central Italy (N = 3,463; 54%), whereas 25% (N = 1,603) and 21% (N = 1,346) were in the North and the South of Italy, respectively. The rates of reported positive cases and deaths among close relatives or friends were about 7% (N = 417) and 3% (N = 167), respectively.

Measures

To evaluate psychological distress and individual adaptive responses we conducted a survey exploring socio-demographic information, COVID-19-related information (i.e., presence/absence of positive cases or death among relatives or friends), psychological distress, and mindfulness disposition. The Italian version of the Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90;; ) and the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS;; ) were used for the assessment of psychological variables.

The Symptoms Checklist-90 is a 90-item 5-point scale assessing psychopathological and somatic symptoms occurring during the past week. Even if it does not control for deceptive responses, in this specific setting is adequate given the absence of faking proneness in respondents. The SCL-90 provides a Global Severity Index (GSI) and nine subscale scores for psychiatric symptoms, such as Somatization (SOM), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (O-C), Interpersonal Sensitivity (I-S), Depression (DEP), Anxiety (ANX), Hostility (HOS), Phobic Anxiety (PHOB), Paranoid Ideation (PAR), and Psychoticism (PSY). Validity and reliability of the scale have been largely documented.

The Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale is a 15-item single-dimension measure of the frequency of open and receptive attention to, and awareness of, ongoing events and experience using a 6-point Likert. All items are presented as negative descriptions of mindfulness, so higher scores indicate less mindfulness. For the purpose of the study, we adapted the MAAS, resulting in a reversed 5-point Likert scale, so higher scores indicated greater mindfulness. The MAAS is a reliable instrument with a Cronbach’s α of 0.87. Adequate test-retest reliability, and convergent as well as discriminate validity have been reported.

Procedure

An online questionnaire was launched online on March 13, 2020, at 17:00 (GMT + 1), 2 days after the Italian Government Decree of lockdown for slowing the diffusion of the COVID-19 outbreak. Participants were recruited using snowball sampling among all Italian residents living in Italy at the time of data collection. They were informed about the purpose of the study and asked to give their approval on personal data treatment. All procedures followed the ethical standards and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Pisa (n. 0036344/2020).

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive data are presented as means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, absolute and relative frequencies. The Anderson-Darling test and Normal P-P plot were used to verify normality of distributions. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated, t-test and simple linear regressions were performed to study the relations between the variables and the outcome. Multivariate analysis was carried out to study the influence of predictive factors on psychological distress. Tolerance index and Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) were calculated to verify the level of correlation between predictors. Tolerance values were > 0.5 and VIF values were < 2, these results showed no evidence of multicollinearity. Goodness of fit of the multivariate analysis was verified, adjusted R2 resulted 0.43, showing a good level of fit model. Post hoc power analysis was used to evaluate the sample size and the probability of type II error; the range of statistical power was 0–1 and the power of the sample was 1. The significance level was set to 0.05 and the analyses were performed with R version 4.0.0.

Results

Table 1 shows descriptive statistics for socio-demographic characteristics of participants. In line with previous studies, young, female, living with parents, and not having children were more frequent among responders. Descriptive statistics for psychological variables are displayed in Table 2. Mindfulness mean scores assessed around normative values for healthy individuals (M = 2.881; SD = 0.653), while psychological distress mean score ranged slightly below the cut-off for clinical significance (M = 0.730; SD = 0.536). These results indicated that responders represented a community sample experiencing a stressful life event such as the lockdown as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Tables 3, 4 show results from univariate and multivariate linear regression run on socio-demographic variables and mindfulness disposition as predictors of overall psychological distress are displayed. Table 3 shows results of preliminary univariate linear regression analyses of all socio-demographic variables on the GSI. We entered in the multivariate linear regression model only variables that resulted significantly related to the GSI. Variables included were age, gender, quarantine, people living with, having children, and mindfulness. Table 4 shows that all factors resulted significantly, with the only exception of having children that was no longer significant in the final model. Mindfulness resulted the best predictor of GSI, about 10 times more effective than other predictors included. Each increase of one unit of MAAS results in a decrease of -0.5 in GSI (β = -0.504; p < 0.0001). Conversely, quarantining negatively affected mental health, increasing GSI of 0.05 for each week passed in lockdown. Younger subjects and females were at higher risk for mental health problems, while living with one’s spouse resulted in them feeling slightly protected in terms of psychological well-being. VIF < 2 demonstrated low collinearity level between independent variables.

Table 5 shows Pearson correlations between MAAS and SCL-90. High negative correlations were found for mindfulness disposition and overall psychological distress (r = -0.637; p < 0.0001), obsessive compulsive (O-C; r = -0.627; p < 0.0001), and psychoticism (PSY; r = -0.593; p < 0.0001). The remaining SCL-90 sub-scales showed moderate negative correlations ranging from 0.386 to 0.565 (all p < 0.0001). In descending order of magnitude they were: depression (DEP), interpersonal sensibility (INT), anxiety (ANX), paranoid (PAR), hostility (HOS), somatization (SOM), phobic anxiety (PHOB), and sleep disturbance (SLEEP), with a very tight 95% confidence interval demonstrating excellent goodness of fit.

Discussion

The current study contributes to a growing literature on the benefits of protective factors on psychological functioning during high stress situations. According to our findings, dispositional mindfulness may represent a stable protective factor from the current intensity of mental distress of individuals; in fact, increasing levels of mindfulness corresponded to significantly decreased mental discomfort.

With regard to our first hypothesis which stated that certain individuals are at higher risk for psychological distress, whereas others show better adjustment to stressful situations, the results indicated that dispositional mindfulness, older age, living with loved one, and being a parent were protective factors, while female gender and lockdown duration increased the risk of psychological distress. Each increase of one unit of MAAS results in a decrease of -0.5 in GSI (β = -0.504; p < 0.0001), indicating that mindfulness disposition is extremely important as a psychological resource that helps the individual to manage stressful situations. Conversely, quarantining negatively affected mental health, increasing GSI of 0.05 for each week passed in lockdown. Consistent with previous studies, younger subjects and females were at higher risk for mental health problems, while living with one’s spouse resulted in them feeling slightly protected in terms of psychological well-being. The protective factor of mindfulness disposition and training has already been shown in previous literature, influencing positively memory function, cognitive resilience, mental health, emotional balance, and high stress functioning, also decreasing anxiety, depression, and burnout levels. This particular result is extremely significant as it shows that “being mindful” helps in dealing with stressful situations such as the one we are experiencing at the moment and leaves open the possibility for mental health professionals to use mindfulness-based mental training to stem the post-traumatic psychopathological beginnings that are likely to manifest in the future.

In addition to mindfulness, other protective factors emerged from our investigation. Findings showed that with increasing age, individuals showed less psychological distress. As other studies have already demonstrated, age of onset is exceedingly early for some psychopathological disorders such as anxiety, substance use, impulse control, and mood disorders. Nevertheless, it has been proven that after an emergency due to natural disasters, older adults have increased resiliency to psychopathologies such as post-traumatic stress disorder, mood, and anxiety disorders. Taken together, our results confirm a greater resilience in adults compared to young people with regard to high stress functioning, providing an important reflection on the direction of the efforts that mental health professionals will have to address their attention to soon. Furthermore, the social condition (cohabitants’ situation during quarantine) could represent a protective factor against psychological distress. Not surprisingly, amongst the four conditions proposed in our survey, “living with a partner” predicted lower distress during the COVID-19 quarantine. According to previous studies, social relations are indeed a protective factor for mental health, increasing resilience but our findings showed that to be significant, it should come from loved ones. In fact, separation from loved ones seems to be the crucial psychological distress factor during quarantine, despite the support of new devices that are keeping us connected. Furthermore, ‘being a parent’ seems to be a protective condition against mental illness, as already reported in other studies.

Conversely, gender and lockdown duration were good predictors of higher distress among Italians. Female gender seems to be solidly related with higher psychological distress than male gender. As well known, men and women experience different kinds of mental health problems; females tend to exceed males in internalizing disorders with higher prevalence of depression and anxiety. This gap narrows with the temporal and spatial variation in gender role traditionality. There is no doubt that particular attention should be paid to women in this crucial period, who, in addition to being at greater risk of developing a mood disorder or suffering from psychological distress, are unfortunately the main victims of domestic violence. Furthermore, the economic downturn caused by this emergency is more likely to impact sectors with high female employment shares, together with the increasing needs in childcare. Finally, our findings suggested that lockdown duration has a negative impact on mental health; a previous study displayed in the first phase of the Italian quarantine had already reported that individuals in quarantine experienced negative psychosocial changes such as sleep disturbances, post-traumatic symptoms, depression, and anxiety which all have a massive impact on well-being.

Our second hypothesis of a strong negative relationship between mindfulness and psychiatric symptoms of distress was fully confirmed. Mindfulness was found to be negatively correlated with all the analyzed subscales. In particular, individuals with lower mindfulness disposition are more likely to present thoughts, impulses, and actions that are experienced as irresistible but are of an unwanted nature, and cognitive attenuation (Obsessive-compulsive subscale). In addition, lower mindfulness predicted the experience of withdrawal, isolation, and a schizoid lifestyle and also on first-rank schizophrenia symptoms such as hallucinations and thought-broadcasting (Psychoticism subscale; ). Moreover, significant moderate correlations were found for all psychiatric symptoms assessed with the SCL-90, with greater magnitude on interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and anxiety. Results demonstrated that a higher disposition toward mindfulness may represent a protective factor against anxiety, dysphoric mood, lack of motivation, loss of vital energy, feelings of hopelessness, and cognitive and other somatic correlates of depression, as already shown in previous studies.

The present study has several strengths and innovative features, as well as a number of limitations. First, the cross-sectional research design does not allow us to determine causal relationships between studied variables. Moreover, we used a non-randomized sampling method, the so-called snowball sampling, which could be possibly biased by uncontrolled variables. Furthermore, all measures are self-reported and thus they might be biased by the responders’ self-observation attitude. Finally, psychological information was collected online and without any independent evaluation of the health status of the respondents.

Despite all the above, this study indicates that mindfulness and socio-demographic characteristics play a key role in moderating the experience of COVID-19-related distress. Mindfulness dispositions and practice, as with other psychological resources, enhances adaptation and leads to a better adjustment to stress. In order to stem the psychopathological consequences lying ahead in the future due to the traumatic nature of the recent pandemic and quarantine, we therefore suggest paying accurate attention to mindfulness disposition and training, with the purpose of enhancing resilience to high-stress events and preventing the onset of chronic mental disorders.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Pisa. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

CC and MD conceived the assessment. MM contributed to the data analysis. RC contributed to the data interpretation. CC, MD, MM, RC, AG, and GO drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version to be published.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 107

  1. 1.

    Aafjes-van Doorn K. Békés V. Prout T. A. (2020 ). Grappling with our therapeutic relationship and professional self-doubt during COVID-19: will we use video therapy again?. Counsel. Psychol. Q.

    Not in our library10.1080/09515070.2020.1773404

  2. 2.

    Abenavoli R. M. Jennings P. A. Greenberg M. T. Harris A. R. Katz D. A. (2013 ). The protective effects of mindfulness against burnout among educators. Psychol. Educ. Rev. 37 57–69.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Acierno R. Ruggiero K. J. Kilpatrick D. G. Resnick H. S. Galea S. (2006 ). Risk and protective factors for psychopathology among older versus younger adults after the 2004 Florida hurricanes. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 14 1051–1059.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.jgp.0000221327.97904.b0

  4. 4.

    Alon T. M. Doepke M. Olmstead-Rumsey J. Tertilt M. (2020 ). The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality. Economic Fluctuations and Growth No. w26947. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Baer R. A. (2003 ). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 10 125–143.

    Not in our library10.1093/clipsy.bpg015

  6. 6.

    Baer R. A. Smith G. T. Allen K. B. (2004 ). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 11 191–206.

    Not in our library10.1177/1073191104268029

  7. 7.

    Baer R. A. Smith G. T. Hopkins J. Krietemeyer J. Toney L. (2006 ). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment 13 27–45.

    Not in our library10.1177/1073191105283504

  8. 8.

    Bao X. Xue S. Kong F. (2015 ). Dispositional mindfulness and perceived stress: the role of emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 78 48–52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.007

  9. 9.

    Black D. S. Sussman S. Johnson C. A. Milam J. (2012 ). Psychometric assessment of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) among Chinese adolescents. Assessment 19 42–52.

    Not in our library10.1177/1073191111415365

  10. 10.

    Bonicatto S. Dew M. A. Soria J. J. Seghezzo M. E. (1997 ). Validity and. (reliability)of Symptom Checklist ’90 (SCL90) in an Argentine population sample. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 32 332–338.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00805438

  11. 11.

    Bradbury-Jones C. Isham L. (2020 ). The pandemic paradox: the consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. J. Clin. Nurs. [Epub ahead of print].

    Not in our library10.1111/jocn.15296

  12. 12.

    Bränström R. Duncan L. G. Moskowitz J. T. (2011 ). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample. Br. J. Health Psychol. 16 300–316.

    Not in our library10.1348/135910710x501683

  13. 13.

    Brooks S. K. Webster R. K. Smith L. E. Woodland L. Wessely S. Greenberg N. (2020 ). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395 912–920.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8

  14. 14.

    Brown K. W. Ryan R. M. (2003 ). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84:822.

    Not in our library10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

  15. 15.

    Carmassi C. Gesi C. Corsi M. Cremone I. M. Bertelloni C. A. Massimetti E. (2018 ). Exploring PTSD in emergency operators of a major University Hospital in Italy: a preliminary report on the role of gender, age, and education. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 17:17.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12991-018-0184-4

  16. 16.

    Carmassi C. Stratta P. Massimetti G. Bertelloni C. A. Conversano C. Cremone I. M. (2014 ). New DSM-5 maladaptive symptoms in PTSD: gender differences and correlations with mood spectrum symptoms in a sample of high school students following survival of an earthquake. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 13:28.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12991-014-0028-9

  17. 17.

    Cassano G. Conti L. Levine J. (1999 ). “SCL-90,” in Repertorio delle scale di valutazione in psichiatria, ed. Conti L. (Firenze: SEE), 325–332.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Catalano A. Martino G. Bellone F. Papalia M. Lasco C. Basile G. (2019 ). Neuropsychological assessment in elderly men with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with dutasteride”. Clin. Drug Investig. 39 97–102.

    Not in our library10.10007/s40261-018-0720-7

  19. 19.

    Cellini N. Canale N. Mioni G. Costa S. (2020 ). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time, and digital media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. J. Sleep Res. 29:e13074

    Not in our library10.31234/osf.io/284mr

  20. 20.

    Chang V. Y. Palesh O. Caldwell R. Glasgow N. Abramson M. Luskin F. (2004 ). The effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on stress, mindfulness self-efficacy, and positive states of mind. Stress Health 20 141–147.

    Not in our library10.1002/smi.1011

  21. 21.

    Chu C. S. Stubbs B. Chen T. Y. Tang C. H. Li D. J. Yang W. C. (2018 ). The effectiveness of adjunct mindfulness-based intervention in treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review, and meta-analysis. J. Affect Disord. 225 234–245.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.025

  22. 22.

    Conversano C. (2019 ). Common psychological factors in chronic diseases. Front. Psychol. 10:2727.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02727

  23. 23.
    Mindfulness, Compassion, and Self-Compassion Among Health Care Professionals: What's New? A Systematic Review · 2020
    No notice
  24. 24.

    Conversano C. Marchi L. Miniati M. (2020b ). Psychological distress among healthcare professionals involved in the COVID-19 emergency: vulnerability and resilience factors. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 17 94–96.

    Not in our library10.36131/cn20200212

  25. 25.

    Costa P. T. Jr. McCrae R. R. (2008 ). “The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R),” in The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, Vol. 2. Personality Measurement and Testing, eds Boyle G. J. Matthews G. Saklofske D. H. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc), 179–198.

    Not in our library10.4135/9781849200479.n9

  26. 26.

    Davidson R. J. Kabat-Zinn J. Schumacher J. Rosenkranz M. Muller D. Santorelli S. F. (2003 ). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychos. Med. 65 564–570.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.psy.0000077505.67574.e3

  27. 27.

    De Frias C. M. Whyne E. (2015 ). Stress on health-related quality of life in older adults: the protective nature of mindfulness. Aging Ment. Health 19 201–206.

    Not in our library10.1080/13607863.2014.924090

  28. 28.

    Dell’Osso L. Casu G. Carlini M. Conversano C. Gremigni P. Carmassi C. (2012 ). Sexual obsessions and suicidal behaviors in patients with mood disorders, panic disorder and schizophrenia. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 11:27.

    Not in our library10.1186/1744-859x-11-27

  29. 29.

    Deng Y. Q. Li S. Tang Y. Y. (2014 ). The relationship between wandering mind, depression and mindfulness. Mindfulness 5 124–128.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12671-012-0157-7

  30. 30.

    Derogatis L. R. Cleary P. A. (1977 ). Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: a study in construct validation. J. Clin. Psychol. 33 981–989.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:4<981::aid-jclp2270330412>3.0.co;2-0

  31. 31.

    Derogatis L. R. Lipman R. S. Covi L. (1973 ). SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 9 13–27.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Derogatis L. R. Rickels K. Rock A. F. (1976 ). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 128 280–289.

    Not in our library10.1192/bjp.128.3.280

  33. 33.

    Di Giuseppe M. Ciacchini R. Micheloni T. Bertolucci I. Marchi L. Conversano C. (2018 ). Defense mechanisms in cancer patients: a systematic review. J. Psychosom. Res. 115 76–86.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.016

  34. 34.

    Di Giuseppe M. Ciacchini R. Piarulli A. Nepa G. Conversano C. (2019a ). Mindfulness disposition and defense style as a positive responses to psychological distress in oncology professionals. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 40 104–110.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejon.2019.04.003

  35. 35.
    Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the defensive profile in breast cancer women: A pilot study · 2019
    Not checked
  36. 36.

    Di Giuseppe M. Gemignani A. Conversano C. (2020a ). Psychological resources against the traumatic experience of COVID-19. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 17 85–87.

    Not in our library10.36131/cn20200207

  37. 37.

    Di Giuseppe M. Gennaro A. Lingiardi V. Perry J. C. (2019c ). The role of defense mechanisms in emerging personality disorders in clinical adolescents. Psychiatry 82 128–142.

    Not in our library10.1080/00332747.2019.1579595

  38. 38.

    Di Giuseppe M. Miniati M. Miccoli M. Ciacchini R. Orrù G. Lo Sterzo R. (2020b ). Defensive responses to stressful life events associated with cancer diagnosis. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 8. 31160582

    Not in our library10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2384

  39. 39.

    Di Giuseppe M. Perry J. C. Conversano C. Gelo O. C. G. Gennaro A. (2020c ). Defense mechanisms, gender and adaptiveness in emerging personality disorders in adolescent outpatients. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 8.

    Not in our library10.1080/00332747.2019.1579595

  40. 40.

    Di Giuseppe M. Perry J. C. Lucchesi M. Michelini M. Vitiello S. Piantanida A., et al. (2020d ). Preliminary validity and reliability of the novel self-report based on the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS-SR-30). Front. Psychiatry 11:870

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00870

  41. 41.

    Di Giuseppe M. Prout T. A. Fabiani M. Kui T. (2020e ). Defensive profile of parents of children with externalizing problems receiving regulation-focused psychotherapy for children (RFP-C): a pilot study. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 8. 31160582

    Not in our library10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2515

  42. 42.

    Dixon H. C. Overall N. C. (2016 ). Dispositional mindfulness attenuates the link between daily stress and depressed mood. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 35 255–268.

    Not in our library10.1521/jscp.2016.35.3.255

  43. 43.

    Evans S. Ferrando S. Findler M. Stowell C. Smart C. Haglin D. (2008 ). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. J. Anxiety Disord. 22 716–721.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.005

  44. 44.

    Fisher S. Guralnik T. Fonagy P. Zilcha-Mano S. (2020 ). Let’s face it: video conferencing psychotherapy requires the extensive use of ostensive cues. Counsel. Psychol. Q.

    Not in our library10.1080/09515070.2020.1777535

  45. 45.

    Fonagy P. Bateman A. W. (2016 ). Adversity, attachment, and mentalizing. Compr. Psychiatry 64 59–66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.11.006

  46. 46.

    Fuller-Iglesias H. Sellars B. Antonucci T. C. (2008 ). Resilience in old age: social relations as a protective factor. Res. Hum. Dev. 5 181–193.

    Not in our library10.1080/15427600802274043

  47. 47.

    Geng L. Wang J. Cheng L. Zhang B. Shen H. (2019 ). Mindful learning improves positive feelings of cancer patients’ family caregivers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:248.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph16020248

  48. 48.

    Helbig S. Lampert T. Klose M. Jacobi F. (2006 ). Is parenthood associated with mental health? Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 41 889–896.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00127-006-0113-8

  49. 49.

    Holmes E. A. O’Connor R. C. Perry V. H. Tracey I. Wessely S. Arseneault L. (2020 ). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 7 547–560.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1

  50. 50.

    Idusohan-Moizer H. Sawicka A. Dendle J. Albany M. (2015 ). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities: an evaluation of the effectiveness of mindfulness in reducing symptoms of depression, and anxiety. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 59 93–104.

    Not in our library10.1111/jir.12082

  51. 51.

    Jha A. P. Morrison A. B. Parker S. C. Stanley E. A. (2017 ). Practice is protective: mindfulness training promotes cognitive resilience in high-stress cohorts. Mindfulness 8 46–58.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12671-015-0465-9

  52. 52.

    Jha A. P. Stanley E. A. Kiyonaga A. Wong L. Gelfand L. (2010 ). Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion 10:54.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0018438

  53. 53.

    Jones P. B. (2013 ). Adult mental health disorders and their age at onset. Br. J. Psychiatry 202 s5–s10.

    Not in our library10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119164

  54. 54.

    Kabat-Zinn J. (2003 ). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 10 144–156.

    Not in our library10.1093/clipsy.bpg016

  55. 55.

    Kabat-Zinn J. (2015 ). Mindfulness. Mindfulness 6 1481–1483.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12671-015-0456-x

  56. 56.

    Kessler R. C. Angermeyer M. Anthony J. C. De Graaf R. Demyttenaere K. Gasquet I. (2007 ). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the world health organization’s world mental health survey initiative. World Psychiatry 6 168–176.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Kwon J. Grady C. Feliciano J. T. Fodeh S. J. (2020 ). Defining facets of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: twitter analysis. MedRxiv [Preprint].

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.26.20080937

  58. 58.

    Lam A. H. Y. Leung S. F. Lin J. J. Chien W. T. (2020 ). The effectiveness of a mindfulness-based psychoeducation programme for emotional regulation in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 16 729–747.

    Not in our library10.2147/ndt.s231877

  59. 59.

    Lara M. C. Espinosa S. I. Cárdenas M. L. (2005 ). Reliability, and validity of the SCL-90 for the evaluation of psychopathology in women. Salud Mental 28 42–50.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Lenzo V. Sardella A. Martino G. Quattropani M. C. (2020 ). A systematic review of metacognitive beliefs in chronic medical conditions. Front. Psychol. 10:2875.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02875

  61. 61.
    The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users · 2020
    No notice
  62. 62.

    Lingiardi V. Gazzillo F. Colli A. De Bei F. Tanzilli A. Di Giuseppe M. (2010 ). Diagnosis and assessment of personality, therapeutic alliance and clinical exchange in psychotherapy research. Res. Psychother. 2 97–124.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Maffei C. Fossati A. Lingiardi V. Madeddu F. Borellini C. Petrachi M. (1995 ). Personality maladjustment, defenses, and psychopathological symptoms in nonclinical subjects. J. Personal. Disord. 9 330–345.

    Not in our library10.1521/pedi.1995.9.4.330

  64. 64.

    Manuell M. E. Cukor J. (2011 ). Mother Nature versus human nature: public compliance with evacuation and quarantine. Disasters 35 417–442.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01219.x

  65. 65.

    Marazziti D. Golia F. Picchetti M. Pioli E. Mannari P. Lenzi F. (2008 ). Decreased density of the platelet serotonin transporter in pathological gamblers. Neuropsychobiology 57 38–43.

    Not in our library10.1159/000129665

  66. 66.

    Marazziti D. Pozza A. Di Giuseppe M. Conversano C. (2020 ). The psycho-social impact of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a lesson for mental health prevention in the first severely hit European country. Psychol. Trauma 12 531–533.

    Not in our library10.1037/tra0000687

  67. 67.

    Marazziti D. Tomaiuolo F. Dell’Osso L. Demi V. Campana S. Piccaluga E. (2015 ). Neuropsychological testing in interventional cardiology staff after long-term exposure to ionizing radiation. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 21 670–676.

    Not in our library10.1017/s135561771500082x

  68. 68.

    Marchi L. Marzetti F. Orrù G. Lemmetti S. Miccoli M. Ciacchini R. (2019 ). Alexitimia and psychological distress in patients with fibromyalgia and rheumatic disease. Front. Psychol. 10:1735.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01735

  69. 69.

    Martino G. Bellone F. Langher V. Caputo A. Catalano A. Quattropani M. C. (2019a ). Alexithymia and psychological distress affect perceived quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 7. 31160582

    Not in our library10.6092/2282-1619/2019.7.2328

  70. 70.
    As Time Goes by: Anxiety Negatively Affects the Perceived Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes of Long Duration · 2019
    Not checked
  71. 71.

    Martino G. Caputo A. Bellone F. Quattropani M. C. Vicario C. (2020a ). Going beyond the visible in type 2 diabetes mellitus: defense mechanisms and their associations with depression and health-related quality of life. Front. Psychol. 11:267.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00267

  72. 72.

    Martino G. Catalano A. Agostino R. M. Bellone F. Morabito N. Lasco C. G. (2020b ). Quality of life and psychological functioning in postmenopausal women undergoing aromatase inhibitor treatment for early breast cancer. PLoS One 15:e0230681.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0230681

  73. 73.

    Martino G. Langher V. Cazzato V. Vicario C. M. (2019c ). Editorial: psychological factors as determinants of medical conditions. Front. Psychol. 10:2502.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02502

  74. 74.

    Matti H. (2003 ). Assessment of Psychiatric Symptoms using the SCL-90. Helsingin Yliopisto 15 203–211.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Maunder R. Hunter J. Vincent L. Bennett J. Peladeau N. Leszcz M. (2003 ). The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ 168 1245–1251.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.
    Opinion Article: The role of psychological features in chronic diseases, advancements and perspectives · 2019
    Not checked
  77. 77.

    Mula M. Pini S. Monteleone P. Iazzetta P. Preve M. Tortorella A. (2008 ). Different temperament and character dimensions correlate with panic disorder comorbidity in bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. J. Anxiety Disord. 22 1421–1426.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.004

  78. 78.

    Muratori P. Ciacchini R. (2020 ). Children and the COVID-19 transition: psychological reflections and suggestions on adapting to the emergency. ClinNeuropsychiatry 17 131–134.

    Not in our library10.36131/cn20200219

  79. 79.

    Nelson S. K. Kushlev K. Lyubomirsky S. (2014 ). The pains and pleasures of parenting: when, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well-being? Psychol. Bull. 140 846–895.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0035444

  80. 80.

    Orrù G. Ciacchini A. Gemignani A. Conversano C. (2020 ). Psychological intervention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 17 76–79.

    Not in our library10.36131/cn20200208

  81. 81.

    Orrù G. Gemignani A. Ciacchini R. Bazzichi L. Conversano C. (2020a ). Machine learning increases diagnosticity in psychometric evaluation of alexithymia in fibromyalgia. Front. Med. 6:319.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmed.2019.00319

  82. 82.

    Orrù G. Monaro M. Conversano C. Gemignani A. Sartori G. (2020b ). Machine learning in psychometrics and psychological research. Front. Psychol. 10:2970.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02970

  83. 83.

    Pearl J. (2010 ). An introduction to causal inference. Int. J. Biostat. 6:7.

    Not in our library10.2202/1557-4679.1203

  84. 84.

    Piccinni A. Origlia N. Veltri A. Vizzaccaro C. Marazziti D. Catena-Dell’Osso M. (2012 ). Plasma β-amyloid peptides levels: a pilot study in bipolar depressed patients. J. Affect. Disord. 138 160–164.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.042

  85. 85.

    Poli A. Gemignani A. Conversano C. (2020 ). The psychological impact of SARS-CoV-2 quarantine: observations through the lens of the polyvagal theory. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 17 112–114.

    Not in our library10.36131/cn20200216

  86. 86.

    Prout T. A. Malone A. Rice T. Hoffman L. (2019 ). Resilience, defenses, and implicit emotion regulation in psychodynamic child psychotherapy. J. Contemp. Psychother. 49 235–244.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10879-019-09423-w

  87. 87.

    Rasmussen M. K. Pidgeon A. M. (2011 ). The direct and indirect benefits of dispositional mindfulness on self-esteem and social anxiety. Anxiety Stress Coping 24 227–233.

    Not in our library10.1080/10615806.2010.515681

  88. 88.

    Rosenfield S. (1999 ). “Gender and mental health: do women have more psychopathology, men more, or both the same (and why)?,” in A handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories, and Systems, eds Horwitz A. V. Scheid T. L. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press), 348–360.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Rosenfield S. Mouzon D. (2013 ). “Gender and mental health,” in Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, eds Aneshensel C. S. Phelan J. C. Bierman A. (Cham: Springer), 277–296.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    Ryan R. M. Deci E. L. (2000 ). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55 68–78.

    Not in our library10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

  91. 91.

    Salovey P. Mayer J. D. Goldman S. L. Turvey C. Palfai T. F. (1995 ). “Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale,” in Emotion, Disclosure, and Health, ed. Pennebaker J. W. (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 125–154.

    Not in our library10.1037/10182-006

  92. 92.

    Sartori G. Zangrossi A. Orrù G. Monaro M. (2017 ). Detection of Malingering in Psychic Damage Ascertainment in P5 Medicine and Justice. Cham: Springer, 330–341.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Seedat S. Scott K. M. Angermeyer M. C. Berglund P. Bromet E. J. Brugha T. S. (2009 ). Cross-national associations between gender and mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66 785–795.

    Not in our library10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.36

  94. 94.

    Segal Z. V. Teasdale J. (2018 ). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Shear J. Jevning R. (1999 ). Pure consciousness: scientific exploration of meditation techniques. J. Conscious. Stud. 6 189–210.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Soysa C. K. Wilcomb C. J. (2015 ). Mindfulness, self-compassion, self-efficacy, and gender as predictors of depression, anxiety, stress, and well-being. Mindfulness 6 217–226.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12671-013-0247-1

  97. 97.
    Mindfulness-Based Interventions for People Diagnosed with a Current Episode of an Anxiety or Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials · 2014
    No notice
  98. 98.

    Tang Y. Hölzel B. Posner M. (2015 ). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16 213–225.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn3916

  99. 99.

    Taub A. (2020 ). A new Covid-19 Crisis: Domestic Abuse Rises Worldwide. New York, NY: The New York Times.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Teasdale J. D. Segal Z. V. Williams J. M. G. Ridgeway V. A. Soulsby J. M. Lau M. A. (2000 ). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 68 615–623.

    Not in our library10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.615

  101. 101.

    Veltri A. Scarpellini P. Piccinni A. Conversano C. Giacomelli C. Bombardieri S. (2012 ). Methodological approach to depressive symptoms in fibromyalgia patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol 30(Suppl. 74), S136–S142.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    Veneziani C. A. Voci A. (2015 ). The italian adaptation of the mindful awareness attention scale, and its relation with individual differences, and quality of life indexes. Mindfulness 6 373–381.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12671-013-0270-2

  103. 103.

    Walsh J. J. Balint M. G. Sj D. R. S. Fredericksen L. K. Madsen S. (2009 ). Predicting individual differences in mindfulness: the role of trait anxiety, attachment anxiety and attentional control. Pers. Individ. Diff. 46 94–99.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.008

  104. 104.

    Wang C. Pan R. Wan X. Tan Y. Xu L. McIntyre R. S. (2020 ). A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav. Immun. 87 40–48.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028

  105. 105.

    Westphal M. Bingisser M. B. Feng T. Wall M. Blakley E. Bingisser R. (2015 ). Protective benefits of mindfulness in emergency room personnel. J. Affect. Disord. 175 79–85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.038

  106. 106.

    Xu M. Purdon C. Seli P. Smilek D. (2017 ). Mindfulness and mind wandering: the protective effects of brief meditation in anxious individuals. Conscious. Cogn. 51 157–165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.009

  107. 107.

    Zhang M. F. Wen Y. S. Liu W. Y. Peng L. F. Wu X. D. Liu Q. W. (2015 ). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapy for reducing anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine 94:e0897.

    Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000000897

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.