Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Assessing factorial invariance of two-way rating designs using three-way methods

P. M. Kroonenberg

Frontiers in Psychology · 2015

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01495 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Assessing the factorial invariance of two-way rating designs such as ratings of concepts on several scales by different groups can be carried out with three-way models such as the Parafac and Tucker models. By their definitions these models are double-metric factorially invariant. The differences between these models lie in their handling of the links between the concept and scale spaces. These links may consist of unrestricted linking (Tucker2 model), invariant component covariances but variable variances per group and per component (Parafac model), zero covariances and variances different per group but not per component (Replicated Tucker3 model) and strict invariance (Component analysis on the average matrix). This hierarchy of invariant models, and the procedures by which to evaluate the models against each other, is illustrated in some detail with an international data set from attachment theory.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References30

    30 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Cited by papers we hold1

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.