Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Rethinking Sensory Systems and their Interactions: The case for sensory pluralism

Matthew eFulkerson

Frontiers in Psychology · 2014

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01426 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

I argue for sensory pluralism. This is the view that there are many forms of sensory interaction and unity, and no single category that classifies them all. In other words, sensory interactions do not form a single natural kind. This view suggests that how we classify sensory systems (and the experiences they generate) partly depends on our explanatory purposes. I begin with a detailed discussion of the issue as it arises for our understanding of thermal perception, followed by a general account and defense of sensory pluralism.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Cited by papers we hold1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.