Referential and visual cues to structural choice in sentence production
Andriy eMyachykov, Dominic eThompson, Christoph eScheepers and 1 more
Frontiers in Psychology · 2012
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00396 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
We investigated how conceptually informative (referent preview) and conceptually uninformative (pointer to referent's location) visual cues affect structural choice during production of English transitive sentences. Cueing the Agent or the Patient prior to presenting the target-event reliably predicted the likelihood of selecting this referent as the sentential Subject, triggering, correspondingly, the choice between active and passive voice. Importantly, there was no difference in the magnitude of the general Cueing effect between the informative and uninformative cueing conditions, suggesting that attentionally driven structural selection relies on a direct automatic mapping mechanism from attentional focus to the Subject's position in a sentence. This mechanism is, therefore, independent of accessing conceptual, and possibly lexical, information about the cued referent provided by referent preview.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References58
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 58 referencesCited by papers we hold1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.