Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Metabolomic Analysis Identifies Differences Between Wild and Domesticated Chili Pepper Fruits During Development (Capsicum annuum L.)

Felipe Cervantes-Hernández, Neftalí Ochoa-Alejo, Octavio Martínez and 1 more

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2022

doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.893055 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Capsicum spp. members are a rich source of specialized compounds due to their secondary metabolism. Some metabolic pathways have suffered modifications during the domestication process and improvement of agricultural traits. Here, we compared non-targeted LC–MS profiles from several areas: wild accessions (C. annuum L. var. glabriusculum), domesticated cultivars (C. annuum L.), and the F1 progeny of a domesticated, and a wild accession cross (in both directions) throughout seven stages of fruit development of chili pepper fruits. The main detected differences were in glycerophospholipid metabolism, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, sphingolipid metabolism, and cutin biosynthesis. The domesticated group exhibited a higher abundance in 12′-apo-β-carotenal, among others capsorubin, and β-tocopherol. Palmitic acid and derivates, terpenoids, and quercitrin were prevalent in the wild accessions. F1 progeny showed a higher abundance of capsaicin, glycol stearate, and soyacerebroside I. This work supports evidence of the side-affectation of trait selection over the metabolism of chili pepper fruit development. Furthermore, it was also observed that there was a possible heterosis effect over the secondary metabolism in the F1 progeny.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.