Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Signaling Role of Glutamate in Plants

Xue-Mei Qiu, Yu-Ying Sun, Xin-Yu Ye and 1 more

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01743

Abstract

It is well known that glutamate (Glu), a neurotransmitter in human body, is a protein amino acid. It plays a very important role in plant growth and development. Nowadays, Glu has been found to emerge as signaling role. Under normal conditions, Glu takes part in seed germination, root architecture, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth. Under stress conditions, Glu participates in wound response, pathogen resistance, response and adaptation to abiotic stress (such as salt, cold, heat, and drought), and local stimulation (abiotic or biotic stress)-triggered long distance signaling transduction. In this review, in the light of the current opinion on Glu signaling in plants, the following knowledge was updated and discussed. 1) Glu metabolism; 2) signaling role of Glu in plant growth, development, and response and adaptation to environmental stress; as well as 3) the underlying research directions in the future. The purpose of this review was to look forward to inspiring the rapid development of Glu signaling research in plant biology, particularly in the field of stress biology of plants.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

In animal system including human body, glutamate (Glu), also known as α-aminoglutaric acid, is a key excitatory neurotransmitter. Glu mediates neural signaling transduction in the synapses, participates in cognition, learning, memory, and other physiological and pathological processes. Glu as a signaling molecule in animal system has been found for more than 50 years. In presynaptic cells, Glu usually exerts its signaling role by two types of receptors, namely ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) and metabolic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). The later also known as G-protein coupled receptors. The iGluRs can form ion (such as Ca2+, Na+) channels, which can be directly activated by their agonist Glu. The mGluRs can activate ion channels via coupling to G-protein signaling system by the following signaling pathways. 1) Ion channels can be directly activated by γ, β subunits of the G-protein; or 2) indirectly activated through triggering second messengers (such as inositol triphosphate: IP3; reactive oxygen species: ROS; nitric oxide: NO). These indicate the signaling crosstalk between Glu and other signaling molecules in signaling transduction in plants.

It is well known that Glu is a protein amino acid, which is a precursor of the synthesis of proteins and polypeptides. Besides, Glu also is a common precursor of many organic compounds. These organic compounds include protein amino acids (glutamine: Gln; proline: Pro; arginine: Arg; and histidine: His), non-protein amino acid (γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA), antioxidant tripeptide (glutathione, GSH), heme, chlorophyll, and so forth. In addition, Glu has the following features: chemical stability, metabolic generation and easy removal (interconversion with α-ketoglutarate), negative charge (at physiological pH value), and acidic amino acid [due to its two carboxyl groups (α- and γ-carboxyl) and one amino group]. Therefore, Glu is a multifunctional (at least metabolite and signaling molecule) amino acid.

Recently, in plants, in addition to above-mentioned functions, Glu is found to emerge as a novel signaling role in many physiological processes. These processes include seed germination, root architecture, pollen germination and pollen tube growth, wound response and pathogen resistance, and response and adaptation to abiotic stress. In addition, Glu can act as a long-distance signaling transducer among cells, tissues, organs, and even the whole plants by the crosstalk with Ca2+, ROS, and electrical signaling. Numerous studies have showed that Glu usually exerts signaling role by its receptors, that is, glutamate receptors (GLRs), similar to iGluRs in animals. In plants, GLRs are at least classified into three clades: clade I (GLRs 1.1–1.4), clade II (GLRs 2.1–2.9), and clade III (GLRs 3.1–3.7). In this review, in view of the current opinion on Glu signaling in plants, the following knowledge was updated and discussed. 1) Glu metabolism; 2) signaling role of Glu in plant growth, development, and response and adaptation to environmental stress, as well as 3) the underlying research directions in the future was discussed. The purpose of this review was to look forward to exciting the rapid development of Glu signaling research in the plant biology, particularly in the field of stress biology of plants.

Metabolism and Homeostasis of Glutamate in Plants

As mentioned above, Glu plays a very important role in plant growth, development, and response and adaptation to environmental stress. In plants, Glu can be principally synthesized via glutamine synthetase (GS)/Glu synthase (also known as Gln-α-ketoglutarate aminotransferase, GOGAT) cycle in the chloroplasts of photosynthetic tissue or non-photosynthetic tissue plastids and Glu dehydrogenase (GDH) in the mitochondria or cytoplasm. They regulate the homeostasis of Glu, Gln, 2-oxoglutarate (GO), and ammonia (NH3) in plant cells. In addition, plants also can produce Glu by Pro/pyrroline 5-carboxylate (P5C) cycle and transamination, which are alternative pathways (;;;;; Figure 1). These pathways not only insure the timely supply of Glu from nitrate reduction, but also maintain ammonia homeostasis in plant cells, which prevents from the toxic action of ammonia. Excessive ammonia (NH3) is toxic to plant cells mainly by interfering with energy metabolism (namely eliminating proton motive force by binding H+ to form ammonium) and/or disrupting pH balance. Also, Arg and His can separately synthesize Glu by intermediates, N-formimino Glu.

In addition to its anabolism, Glu in the mitochondria can be exported into cytoplasm by Glu transporters, and then degraded to GABA by Glu decarboxylase (GAD). Subsequently, the GABA is imported into mitochondria by GABA permease locating on the mitochondrial endomembrane, which in turn is converted into succinic semialdehyde (SSA) by GABA transaminase (GABA-T). Afterward, SSA dehydrogenase (SSADH) catalyzes the conversion of SSA to succinate (SUC, a major source for tricarboxylic acid cycle), which in turn enters into tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, further regulating redox balance and energy metabolism (;; Figure 1). This process is known as GABA shunt. GABA shunt not only is a bridge linking carbon and nitrogen metabolism (and even secondary metabolism), but also plays a very important role in energy, redox, carbon/nitrogen, and Glu/GABA balance. In addition, GABA can trigger other signaling molecules (such as Ca2+, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and ethylene) by binding with its putative receptors, which in turn regulating polyamine metabolism and plant growth (such as pollen tube growth and development).

Besides, Glu can be taken up directly by the roots, and then transported among tissues or organs through xylem and phloem. In general, the redistribution of Glu can be achieved by transporters locating in the plasma membrane. In Arabidopsis, the Glu transporters include cationic amino acid transporters (CAT) family (amino acid-polyamine-choline facilitator, APC superfamily), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) permease-related (APC superfamily), and amino acid transporter family (ATF superfamily). Glu redistribution can alter plant growth and development, which in turn improve the resistance of plants to adverse environments. Therefore, these transporters play a very important role in Glu uptake, homeostasis, and signaling in plants.

Generally, Glu is maintains homeostasis in plant cells by above biosynthesis and catabolism pathways. In different tissues, organs, and subcellular organelles, Glu has been found to have different concentrations. In Arabidopsis thaliana leaves, the amount of Glu remains about 1 μmol g−1 fresh weight (FW), but in phloem cells, Glu content reaches 50 mM. When the phloem cells were wounded by herbivores or external forces, Glu will pour into apoplastic spaces (cell wall), initiating Glu signaling-centered transduction pathways. In addition, the different concentrations of Glu were observed in various plant species, such as tobacco (3~4 μmol g−1 FW, ), potato (1~1.3 μmol g−1 FW, ), tomato (2.32 μmol g−1 FW, ), and spinach (2 μmol mg−1 chlorophyll, ) leaves. Similarly, the concentrations of Glu were monitored in phloem cells of broad bean (7.4 mM), alfalfa (12.7 mM), red clover (13.8 mM), while 1 mM in leaf apoplasts of spinach and Arabidopsis. In short, the concentrations of Glu vary in plant species, but that of Glu in phloem cells are higher than that of extracellular spaces, which might be the basis for Glu as signaling molecule in plants.

Seed Germination

For seed plants, seed germination is the first and a key step in plant life cycle, which is an important basis of successful plant cloning and propagation. In general, seed germination is tightly regulated by the synergistic action of endogenous (mainly phytohormones such as abscisic acid, ABA; gibberellin, GA; ethylene, ETH) and exogenous signals (such as light, temperature, water, and oxygen). Because seed germination is sensitive and fragile to environmental stress, which has become an important research mode of plant signaling transduction. This signaling mode is involved in numerous signaling molecules (Ca2+; ROS; nitric oxide: NO; hydrogen sulfide: H2S; and plant hormones) and their interactions.

Numerous studies have illustrated that exogenous (cell wall) Ca2+ takes part in seed germination via across membrane into the cytosol, which is mediated by Ca2+ channels. In A. thaliana, the gene expression of GLR homolog3.5 (AtGLR3.5, constituting Ca2+ channels) was significantly up-regulated in germinating seeds, which in turn increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, eventually stimulating seed germination via counteracting the inhibiting effect of ABA. Adversely, inhibiting expression of AtGLR3.5 blocked Ca2+ increase in cytosol, followed by delaying germination and increasing ABA sensitivity. In addition, the overexpression of AtGLR3.5 lowered the sensitivity of seeds to ABA and reduced the time of germination (early germinating). Also, Ca2+ could inhibit the gene expression of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE4 (ABI4, a transcription factor), which is involved in ABA response in seeds. These results provide a molecular evidence that the Ca2+ influx mediated by AtGLR3.5 promotes seed germination via relieving the inhibitory effects of ABA by inhibiting ABI4 action.

Root Architecture

The plant root system accounts for 80% of the whole plant, which not only anchors the plant into the soil, but also finds, uptakes, and transports nutrient. In general, the root architecture is regulated by a various of signaling molecules, such as Ca2+, ROS, NO, H2S, Glu, and plant hormones (ABA, auxin, and cytokinin), as well as their crosstalk. Recently, reported that, in model plant Arabidopsis, iGluR competitive antagonists [6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) and 6,7-dinitroquinoxali-ne-2,3-dione acted (DNQX)] dramatically inhibited the growth of primary root and the density of lateral root by impairing root meristem size. On the contrary, the treatment with iGluR agonist Glu recovered the growth of Arabidopsis roots. In addition, a low amount of Ca2+ chelator [ethylene glycol-bis(b-aminoethylether)-N,N,N΄,N΄-tetraacetic acid, EGTA] drastically inhibited the root elongation of Arabidopsis, while this inhibition was partially recovered by Glu. The further experiments showed that 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA, a polar auxin transport inhibitor) inhibited the growth of primary root and reduced the density of lateral roots, whereas this negative effect of NPA was rescued by exogenous Ca2+ and Glu, respectively, indicating that synergistic action of Ca2+, auxin, and Glu signaling in the structure of root architecture in Arabidopsis. Similarly, Glu inhibited the growth of primary root and stimulated the outgrowth of lateral roots, forming a shorter and more branched root system in Arabidopsis. These findings show that GLRs, iGluR-like channels, take part in the development of root architecture by regulating meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis.

In addition, the further pharmacological, electrophysiological, and molecular genetic approaches also confirm that GLRs participate in the establishment of root architecture in Arabidopsis by interaction with Ca2+, mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), ROS, and auxin. In Arabidopsis, the knockout mutant plants of AtGLR3.2 or AtGLR3.4 genes lead to the strong increase in the number of lateral root primordia, but no significant effect on the number of visible lateral roots, suggesting the AtGLR3.2 and AtGLR3.4 regulate the initiation of lateral roots. In addition, the AtGLR3.2/AtGLR3.4 receptors may locate on the surface of the phloem cells to regulate the root architecture by mediating Ca2+ signaling in response to extracellular amino acids including Glu. Similarly, in rice (Oryza sativa), the OsGLR3.1 knockout mutant plants also show a short root, and the further experiments indicate that OsGLR3.1 positively regulates cell proliferation and survival in the root apical meristem.

Also, MAPKs and MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) play a very important role in the plant signaling transduction, which regulate most biological processes including root formation. In Arabidopsis, Glu treatment results in the inhibition of root growth and the curvature of the root tip in wild-type (Col-0) plants, whereas the Glu-induced growth inhibition and curvature were restored in mutant MPK6 kinase (mpk6) seedlings, but aggravated in mutant mkp1 seedlings. These observations imply that the both enzymes (mpk6 and mkp1) participate in the construct of root architecture in Arabidopsis by Glu signaling pathway.

Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth

In higher plants, pollen germination and pollen tube growth are basis for achieving double fertilization, which is a key stage in the whole life cycle of plants. The process needs to perceive and integrate all kinds of signaling molecules, such as Ca2+, ROS, NO, H2S, and plant hormones, eventually forming a sophisticated signaling network controlling pollen germination and pollen tube growth.

In general, Ca2+ plays a central role in pollen germination and pollen tube growth, and an increase in cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) is a fundamental signaling transduction event. However, the formation mechanism of Ca2+ gradient (signaling) in pollen germination and pollen tube growth is not completely clear. have found that, in both tobacco and Arabidopsis, GLRs can form Ca2+ channels and mediate Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane, which in turn modulates apical [Ca2+]cyt gradient and consequently regulates pollen tube growth and morphogenesis. Adversely, iGluR antagonists CNQX, DNQX, and DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5) show an inhibitory effect on Ca2+ signaling and pollen tube growth. In addition, the AtGLR1.2 and AtGLR3.7 mutants can weaken Ca2+ signaling in pollen tube, the AtGLR1.2 mutants show abnormally deformed tips and tubes, while the AtGLR3.7 mutant tubes grow slower than wild-type. These results show a novel signaling mechanism in pollen germination and tube growth between male gametophyte and pistil tissue, which is similar to animal nervous systems based on amino acid–mediated communication.

In addition, GLRs not only are activated by amino acids (Glu; D-serine: D-Ser; Arg; glycine: Gly; isoleucine: Ile; Pro; serine: Ser; threonine: Thr; and tryptophan: Try) in Arabidopsis, but also CORNICHON HOMOLOG (CNIH) proteins (AtCNIHs) done. The specific AtCNIHs can enhance the activity of GLRs (mainly AtGLR3.3) by regulating their sorting, trafficking, location, and quantity without any ligands, which in turn contribute to cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis, thus regulating pollen germination and pollen tube growth.

Glutamate Signaling in Plants Response and Adaptation to Environmental Stress

In addition to seed germination, root architecture, and pollen germination and tube growth mentioned above, Glu as a signaling molecule is also involved in the response and adaptation to salt, cold, heat, drought, pathogen, and wound stress (Table 1), which are discussed as follows in detail.

Salt Stress

Salt stress commonly triggers early (osmotic phase) and late (ionic phase) stress phase. The former refers to the rapid production of osmotic stress within several minutes due to the quick decline in extracellular water potential, while the latter is ion and oxidative stress as well as nutrient imbalance as a result of accumulation of Na+ and Cl− with time passing by. The symptoms of late stress phase can be observed within several days. Generally, plant response and adaptation to salt stress is implicated in a sophisticated signaling interaction network based on Ca2+ signaling. Therefore, Ca2+/calmodulin-centered Ca2+ messenger system plays a crucial role in the response and adaptation to salt stress in plants.

As discussed above, seed germination is sensitive and fragile to environmental stress including NaCl stress, and Ca2+ and ABA regulate seed germination under NaCl stress. In A. thaliana, the results of showed that, compared with the wild-type plants, the AtGLR3.4-1 and AtGLR3.4-2 mutant plants were more sensitive to NaCl in both seed germination and post-germination seedling growth. In addition, in wild-type seedlings, NaCl triggered a striking increase in [Ca2+]cyt, but this increase was blocked by DNQX (GLR antagonist); whereas in both AtGLR3.4-1 and AtGLR3.4-2 mutants NaCl-triggered increase in [Ca2+]cyt was impaired. Also, under NaCl stress, both mutants showed a lower expression of salt overly sensitive (SOS3), SOS2, and SOS1, as well as more accumulation of Na+ than wild-type seeds. In addition to these, compared with the wild-type plants, the both mutants are more sensitive to ABA, while overexpression of AtGLR3.4 was more tolerant to ABA. Also, the content of ABA in both mutants and wild-type plants was no significant difference, accompanied by lower expression of ABI3 and ABI4 in AtGLR3.4 mutants under NaCl stress. Similarly, in Arabidopsis, besides AtGLR3.4, AtGLR3.7 also is involved in the regulation of seed germination under NaCl stress. Recently, also found that AtGLR3.7 interaction with 14-3-3 proteins participated in salt stress response in Arabidopsis by affecting calcium signaling pathways. The data imply that Ca2+ influx mediated by AtGLRs (mainly AtGLR3.4 and AtGLR3.7) regulates seed germination under salt stress.

Cold Stress

In plants, numerous studies have demonstrated that plasma membrane is the primary site perceiving cold stress. The perception of cold stress by plasma membrane can activate Ca2+ channels and triggers Ca2+-centered signaling transduction pathways, eventually responding and adapting to cold stress. In Arabidopsis seedlings, AtGLR1.2 and AtGLR1.3 mutants were sensitive to cold stress, while treatment with jasmonate (JA, a plant hormone) alleviated the sensitivity of AtGLR1.2 and AtGLR1.3 mutants to cold stress. In turn, the overexpression of AtGLR1.2 or AtGLR1.3 could improve the tolerance of mutants to cold stress by synthesizing endogenous JA. In addition, under cold stress, both mutants showed a lower expression of C-repeat binding factor/dehydration responsive element binding1 (CBF/DREB1) compared with the wild-type plants, while the expression of AtGLR1.2-OE [AtGLR1.2-GFP (green fluorescence protein)] and AtGLR1.3-OE [AtGLR1.2-GFP] was upregulated in transgenic plants. The further experiments confirmed that AtGLR1.2 and AtGLR1.3 independently exerted similar role in JA-induced cold tolerance. Recently, in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), reported that cold acclimation at 12°C upregulated the expression of GLR3.3 and GLR3.5, which in turn increased the resistance of tomato plants to a subsequent chilling stress at 4°C. On the contrary, the plants silenced GLR3.3 or/and GLR3.5 or supplemented DNQX all reversed the chilling tolerance induced by cold acclimation compared with the wild types. In wild types, Glu (as a GLR agonist) pretreatment increased the chilling tolerance, but GLR3.3- or GLR3.5-silenced or cosilenced plants failed. In addition, the gene silence or DNQX addition inhibited the gene expression of respiratory burst oxidase homolog1 (RBOH1) and its activity, further reduced the level of apoplastic H2O2 and the GSH/oxidized glutathione (GSSG) ratio, finally led to the decline in chilling tolerance. However, the declined chilling tolerance induced by gene silence or DNQX was rescued by H2O2 or GSH. Furthermore, the tomato plants cosilenced both RBOH1-silenced and GSH biosynthesis genes [γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase: GSH1 and GSH synthetase (GSH2)] also reduced the chilling tolerance, accompanying with reduced GSH/GSSG ratio. Pretreatment with DNQX had no significant effect on the GSH/GSSG ratio and the chilling tolerance in RBOH1-silenced plants and GSH1- and GSH2-cosilenced plants. These findings indicate that plant GLRs (mainly GLR1.2, GLR1.3, GLR3.3, and GLR3.5) positively regulate the cold tolerance of plants by accumulating endogenous JA and subsequently activating the downstream CBF/DREB1 signaling pathway, or activating GLR-H2O2-GSH cascade.

Interestingly, in Arabidopsis, reported that Glu, cold, touch, and osmotic stress stimulated the expression of AtGLR3.4 in an ABA-independent manner, but Ca2+-dependent fashion. Also, in transgenic plants expressing the Ca2+-reporter aequorin, Glu, and cold could trigger an increase in [Ca2+]cyt, and this increase was blocked by GLRs antagonists DNQX and CNQX. These results show that AtGLR3.4 plays a very important role in the Ca2+-based, fast signaling transmission of environmental stress, further supporting the fact that GLRs regulate the cold tolerance of plants.

Heat Stress

High temperature, above the optimal growth temperature, is a major stress factor that impacts on the whole life cycle of plants; Ca2+, crossing membrane into the cells via Ca2+ channels, is implicated in the development of heat tolerance in plants. Recently, the positive effect of Glu in heat tolerance had been found by, who first reported that in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings treatment with Glu elevated the survival percentage of seedlings under heat stress. Also, heat tolerance induced by Glu was impaired by exogenous CaCl2 (may produce Ca2+ overloading), LaCl3 (plasma membrane Ca2+ channel blocker), EGTA (Ca2+ chelator), as well as trifluoperazine and chlorpromazine (calmodulin antagonists). Similarly, the Glu-induced heat tolerance was weakened by GLR antagonist (DNQX) and its blocker (MgCl2). This work has for the first time reported that Glu is able to enhance the heat tolerance of maize seedlings by activating GLRs-mediated calcium signaling, but the detailed physiological and molecular mechanisms need to be further explored in the future.

Drought Stress

Drought stress caused by the decline in soil water potential interferes with many physiological processes at different levels, such as water uptake, transpiration, photosynthesis, seed germination, plant growth, and development. Under severe conditions, drought stress lead simultaneously or successively to osmotic and oxidative stress. Therefore, the regulation of water balance by controlling stomata movement is one of the major strategies that resist and adapt to drought stress in plants.

For land plants, stomata is indispensable structure to control water balance and gas exchange, its movement is regulated by a coordinated action of a series of signaling molecules, such as Ca2+, ROS, NO, H2S, and ABA. In Arabidopsis and fava bean (Vicia faba L.), Glu treatment increased [Ca2+]cyt in guard cells, which in turn led to stomata closure. Glu-induced stomata closure was abolished by EGTA (extracellular Ca2+ chelator), BAPTA-AM (intracellular Ca2+ chelator), La3+ (plasma membrane Ca2+ channel blocker), and AP-5 (a specific antagonist of GLRs). In addition, in Arabidopsis ABA-deficient (aba2-1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1 and abi2-1) mutants, Glu treatment also induced stomata closure, further indicating this closure is ABA-independent manner. Similarly, in slow anion channel-associated 1 (slac1) mutants, Glu treatment had no significant on stomata closure. Similar results could be observed in calcium-dependent protein kinase 6 (cdpk6) mutants, suggesting Glu induces stomata closure in a SLAC- and CDPK-dependent manner. For GLR3.5 mutants, Glu treatment had no effect on stomata closure, further supporting the signaling function of Glu by activating GLRs-mediated Ca2+ signaling pathway. In addition, in Brassica napus, Glu treatment triggered calcium signaling (mainly calcium-dependent protein kinase), which in turn increased the synthesis of salicylic acid. Then, which enhanced drought-induced proline accumulation, thus improving drought tolerance by regulating cellular redox potential.

In a similar vein, in Medicago truncatula seedlings, identified 29 independent MtGLR genes (such as MtGLR2.5, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, and 3.7), which were classified into four clades based on a phylogenetic analysis, and 17 of which showed specific domains consistent with iGluRs. Under drought stress, treatment with GLR competitive antagonists (AP-5 and DNQX) reduced the accumulation of NO induced by ABA, which was no significant effect on stomata closure. In addition, drought stress inhibited the elongation of embryo axis, and this inhibition was deteriorated by GLR antagonists AP-5 and DNQX. These results demonstrate that Glu can promote stomata closure by activating GLR-mediated Ca2+ signaling, which in turn generates NO in Medicago seedling.

Pathogen Stress

Similar abiotic stress, biotic stress response and resistance also is involved in various signaling molecules (Ca2+, ROS, NO, H2S, and Glu) and their cross talks. Glu pretreatment increased the resistant to Penicillium expansum in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit under normal or cold conditions. In addition, Glu also reduced the spore germination of P. expansum both in fruit wounds and in vitro culture. Also, Glu enhanced the activities of β-1,3-glucanase (GLU), chitinase (CHI), phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase, as well as the gene expression of pathogenesis-related proteins1 (PR1), GLU, CHI3, CHI4, and PAL. In addition to these, Glu pretreatment promote the metabolism of amino acids, especially the accumulation of Glu, GABA, and arginine. Similarly, in tomato fruits, Glu pretreatment could upregulate the gene expression of nine GLRs (GLR1.1, GLR1.2, GLR2.1, GLR2.4, GLR2.5, GLR2.6, GLR3.1, GLR3.2, and GLR3.3) and four PRs (PR1a, PR2a, PR3a, and PR3b), as well as the accumulation of eight amino acids (Glu; GABA; methionine: Met; asparagine: Asn; phenylalanine: Phe; His; Lys; and Arg). In turn, which induced the resistance of tomato fruits to Botrytis cinerea. In Arabidopsis, reported that GLRs partially mediated the increase in [Ca2+]cyt, which in turn induced the accumulation of NO and ROS, as well as the gene expression of oligogalacturonides (OGs, defense-related proteins). In addition, in wild-type (Col-0) plants, pretreatment with DNQX was sensitive to B. cinerea and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Further experiments showed that AtGLR3.3 required for the resistance against H. arabidopsidis, the defense gene expression and the generation of NO and ROS triggered by OGs are AtGLR3.3-dependent. The data suggest that AtGLRs (mainly AtGLR3.3) are required in elicitor/pathogen-mediated defense signaling pathways in Arabidopsis.

In addition, the AtGLR3.3-mediated Ca2+ signaling could be triggered by endogenous GSH in Arabidopsis, while blocked by GLR antagonists AP-5 and DNQX, but abolished in AtGLR3.3 mutants. Meanwhile, AtGLR3.3 mutants reduced the expression of defense genes and increased the sensitivity to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Also, Glu also could induce AtGLR3.3-dependent transcription response of defense genes, but lower than that of GSH pretreatment. These findings further support the fact that GLRs (especially AtGLR3.3) are involved in the response and adaptation to pathogen stress in plants.

Wound Stress

Though plants have no nervous system, they can rapidly respond to environmental stimulation including wound stress by a sophisticated signaling transduction pathway. In other words, plants can sense local stimulation/signaling (such as herbivore attack, wound, drought, and high light) and transmit this information to the whole plant body, thus triggering the defense responses, systemic acquired resistance (SAR), or systemic acquired acclimation (SAA). reported that Glu, as a wound signaling, could be rapidly released from phloem cells when Arabidopsis was wound by herbivores or external force. The released Glu bound to GLRs locating on the surface of the phloem cells, and then triggered an increase in [Ca2+]cyt, thus propagating long-distance, Ca2+-based defense response, and even spreading over the whole plant body.

Similarly, in Arabidopsis, wounding triggered and propagated the membrane depolarizations in a GLR-dependent manner, which resulted in the activation of defense genes. The GLR mutants attenuated leaf-to-leaf electrical signaling, but GLR3.3 mutants lost the defense against herbivores. In addition, in wild-type Arabidopsis plants, wounding induced the membrane depolarizations, which in turn triggered [Ca2+]cyt peak. In GLR3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.6 mutants, Ca2+ propagations were weakened differently in the axial and radial distributions. The data expound the key role of GLR3.3 in the defense-related signaling (Ca2+ signaling and electrical signaling) propagation triggered by herbivores.

In addition, further experiments found that in Arabidopsis wounding-triggered Ca2+ signaling promoted the biosynthesis of JA (a potential regulator of defense response) by stimulating lipoxygenase and/or inhibiting phosphorylation of repressors JAV1 within the JAV1-JAZ-8-WRKY51 complex, finally activating plant defense response.

Conclusion and Perspectives

Mounting evidences have found that Glu is a novel signaling molecule, which is involved in many physiological processes. These processes include seed germination, seedling establishment, plant growth, development, senescence, and even response and adaptation to environmental stress, such as salt, cold, heat, drought, wound, and pathogen stress. In soybean crop, foliar or seed application of Glu in both greenhouse and field could enhance the antioxidant capacity by activating antioxidant enzymes catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase and improved nitrogen metabolism and productivity. Under drought stress conditions, foliar or seed application of Glu, as stress reducer, increased Pro and relative water content, leaf and root dry weight, and plant productivity. These might be the basis of Glu-induced stress tolerance in plants. Glu not only a metabolic mediator (storage), which takes part in the biosynthesis of many organic compounds such as amino acids, GABA, proteins, chlorophyll, and so on; but also a novel signaling molecule implicating in all aspects of the life cycle of plants. Glu as a signaling molecule, whose functions are usually achieved by plant GLRs, which is similar to iGluRs in animals. During the process, Glu signaling usually interacts with other signaling molecules such as chemical signaling (Ca2+, ROS, NO) and electrical signaling, which in turn takes shape a sophisticated signaling network, eventually regulating accurately plant growth, development, and defense response (Figure 2).

Recently, in rice,, using transcriptome analysis, revealed that Glu irrigation within 30 min could upregulate the expression of at least 122 genes. These genes are involved in the metabolism, transport, signal transduction, and stress responses. In addition, some transcription factor, kinase/phosphatase, and elicitor-responsive genes were induced by Glu. These results further support the signaling role of Glu in the cellular metabolism, plant growth, and defense responses.

Glu, however, as a novel signaling molecule in plants, the following open questions look forward to being uncovered in the future: 1) the detailed mechanisms of Glu-triggered abiotic and biotic tolerance, especially heat tolerance, will be illuminated at physiological, biochemical, molecular, and even omics levels. 2) Though the members and functions of GLRs have been expounded in many plant species, such as Arabidopsis, rice, M. truncatula, and pear, but the constitutes and functions of GLRs need to be explored and found in various plant species. 3) Glu can induce action potentials (long-distance electrical signals), which can be modulated by osmotic and salt stresses, followed by regulating growth and circumnutation in Helianthus annuus seedlings. Thus imply the crosstalk between Glu and electrical signaling in plant excitability and growth movement. However, the interaction of Glu signaling with other signaling (Ca2+, ROS, and NO), especially H2S and methylglyoxal signaling, also needs to be further solved.

Author Contributions

Z-GL conceived, designed, and wrote the manuscript. X-MQ, Y-YS, and X-YY wrote the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760069, 31360057).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 87

  1. 1.

    Asthir B. (2015 ). Mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. Biol. Plant 59, 620–628.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10535-015-0539-5

  2. 2.

    Bor M. Turkan I. (2019 ). Is there a room for GABA in ROS and RNS signalling? Environ. Exp. Bot. 161, 67–73.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.02.015

  3. 3.

    Brosnan J. T. Brosnan M. E. (2013 ). Glutamate: a truly functional amino acid. Amino Acids 45, 413–418.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00726-012-1280-4

  4. 4.

    Chen Y. H. Kao C. H. (2012 ). Calcium is involved in nitric oxide- and auxin-induced lateral root formation in rice. Protoplasma 249, 187–195.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-011-0277-2

  5. 5.

    Cheng Y. Tian Q. Zhang W. H. (2016 ). Glutamate receptors are involved in mitigating effects of amino acids on seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 130, 68–78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.05.004

  6. 6.

    Cheng Y. Zhang X. Sun T. Tian Q. Zhang W. H. (2018 ). Glutamate receptor homolog3.4 is involved in regulation of seed germination under salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 978–988.

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcy034

  7. 7.

    Choi W. G. Miller G. Wallace I. Harper J. Mittler R. Gilroy S. (2017 ). Orchestrating rapid long-distance signaling in plants with Ca2+, ROS and electrical signals. Plant J. 90, 698–707.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.13492

  8. 8.

    Deinlein U. Stephan A. B. Horie T. Luo W. Xu G. Schroeder J. I. (2014 ). Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 371–379.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001

  9. 9.

    Ding Y. Shi Y. Yang S. (2019 ). Advances and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytol. 222, 1690–1704.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.15696

  10. 10.

    Dresselhaus T. Franklin-Tong N. (2013 ). Male-female crosstalk during pollen germination, tube growth and guidance, and double fertilization. Mol. Plant 6, 1018–1036.

    Not in our library10.1093/mp/sst061

  11. 11.

    Dresselhaus T. Sprunck S. Wessel G. M. (2016 ). Fertilization mechanisms in flowering plants. Curr. Biol. 26, R125–R139.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.032

  12. 12.

    Duermeyer L. Khodapanahi E. Yan D. Krapp A. Rothstein S. J. Nambara E. (2018 ). Regulation of seed dormancy and germination by nitrate. Seed Sci. Res. 28, 150–157.

    Not in our library10.1017/s096025851800020x

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Fabrice M. R. Jing Y. Jiang X. Xiong C. Liu X. Chen J. (2018 ). PbGLR3.3 regulates pollen tube growth in the mediation of Ca2+ influx in Pyrus bretschneideri. J. Plant Biol. 61, 217–226.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12374-016-0210-5

  15. 15.

    Fait A. Fromm H. Walter D. Galili G. Fernie A. R. (2008 ). Highway or byway: the metabolic role of the GABA shunt in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 14–19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2007.10.005

  16. 16.

    Fischer W. N. André B. Rentsch D. Krolkiewicz S. Tegeder M. Breitkreuz K. (1998 ). Amino acid transport in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 188–195.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01231-x

  17. 17.

    Forde B. G. Lea P. J. (2007 ). Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 2339–2358.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erm121

  18. 18.

    Forde B. G. (2014 ). Glutamate signalling in roots. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 779–787.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ert335

  19. 19.

    Friedrich T. Faivre L. Bäurle I. Schubert D. (2018 ). Chromatin-based mechanisms of temperature memory in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 762–770.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.13373

  20. 20.

    Geiger M. Walch-Liu P. Engels C. Harnecker J. Schulze E. D. Ludewig F. (1998 ). Enhanced carbon dioxide leads to a modified diurnal rhythm of nitrate reductase activity in older plants, and a large stimulation of nitrate reductase activity and higher levels of amino acids in young tobacco plants. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 253–268.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00277.x

  21. 21.

    Gong M. Chen S. N. Song Y. Q. Li Z. G. (1997 ). Effect of calcium and calmodulin on intrinsic heat tolerance in relation to antioxidant systems in maize seedlings, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24, 371–379.

    Not in our library10.1071/pp96118

  22. 22.

    Hasanuzzaman M. Shabala L. Brodribb T. J. Zhou M. Shabala S. (2019 ). Understanding physiological and morphological traits contributing to drought tolerance in barley. J. Agr. Crop Sci. 205, 129–140.

    Not in our library10.1111/jac.12307

  23. 23.

    Hildebrandt T. M. Nesi A. N. Araujo W. L. Braun H. P. (2015 ). Amino acid catabolism in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1563–1579.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.005

  24. 24.

    Hunt E. Gattolin S. Newbury H. J. Bale J. S. Tseng H. M. Barrett D. A. (2010 ). A mutation in amino acid permease AAP6 reduces the amino acid content of the Arabidopsis sieve elements but leaves aphid herbivores unaffected. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 55–64.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp274

  25. 25.

    Jin L. Cai Y. Sun C. Huang Y. Yu T. (2019 ). Exogenous l-glutamate treatment could induce resistance against Penicillium expansum in pear fruit by activating defense-related proteins and amino acids metabolism. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 150, 148–157.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.11.009

  26. 26.

    Kan C. C. Chung T. Y. Wu H. Y. Juo Y. A. Hsieh M. H. (2017 ). Exogenous glutamate rapidly induces the expression of genes involved in metabolism and defense responses in rice roots. BMC Genomics 18, 186.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12864-017-3588-7

  27. 27.

    Kong D. Ju C. Parihar A. Kim S. Cho D. Kwak J. M. (2015 ). Arabidopsis glutamate receptor homolog3.5 modulates cytosolic Ca2+ level to counteract effect of abscisic acid in seed germination. Plant Physiol. 167, 1630–1642.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.114.251298

  28. 28.

    López-Bucio J. S. de la Cruz H. R. Guevara-García A. A. (2019 ). “Glutamate sensing in plants,” in Neurotransmitters in plants: perspectives and applications. Eds. Ramakrishna A. Roshchina V. V. (Raton: CRC Press), 231–140.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    La V. H. Lee B.-R. Islam M. T. Park S.-H. Bae D.-W. Kim T.-H. (2019 ). Comparative hormonal regulatory pathway of the drought responses in relation to glutamate-mediated proline metabolism in Brassica napus. bioRxiv 704721.

    Not in our library10.3390/plants9040512

  30. 30.

    Lam H. M. Chiu J. Hsieh M. H. Meisel L. Oliveira I. C. Shin M. (1998 ). Glutamate receptor genes in plants. Nature 396, 125–126.

    Not in our library10.1038/24066

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Li J. Zhu S. Song X. Shen Y. Chen H. M. Yu J. (2006 ). A rice glutamate receptor-like gene is critical for the division and survival of individual cells in the root apical meristem. Plant Cell 18, 340–349.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.037713

  33. 33.

    Li Z. G. Gong M. Xie H. Yang L. Li J. (2012 ). Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-induced heat tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) suspension cultured cells and involvement of Ca2+ and calmodulin. Plant Sci. 185–186, 185–189.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.006

  34. 34.

    Li F. Wang J. Ma C. Zhao Y. Wang Y. Hasi A. (2013 ). Glutamate receptor-like channel3.3 is involved in mediating glutathione-triggered cytosolic calcium transients, transcriptional changes, and innate immunity responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 162, 1497–1509.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.113.217208

  35. 35.

    Li H. Jiang X. Lv X. Ahammed G. A. Guo Z. Qi Z. (2019 ). Tomato GLR3.3 and GLR3.5 mediate cold acclimation-induced chilling tolerance by regulating apoplastic H2O2 production and redox homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ 42, 3326–3339.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.13623

  36. 36.

    Li Z. G. Ye X. Y. Qiu X. M. (2019 ). Glutamate signaling enhances the heat tolerance of maize seedlings by plant glutamate receptor-like channels-mediated calcium signaling. Protoplasma 256, 1165–1169.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-019-01351-9

  37. 37.

    Liu Y. von Wirén N. (2017 ). Ammonium as a signal for physiological and morphological responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2581–2592.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erx086

  38. 38.

    Lohaus G. Heldt H. W. (1997 ). Assimilation of gaseous ammonia and the transport of its products in barley and spinach leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 1779–1178.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/48.10.1779

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Manzoor H. Kelloniemi J. Chiltz A. Wendehenne D. Pugin A. Poinssot B. (2013 ). Involvement of the glutamate receptor AtGLR3.3 in plant defense signaling and resistance to Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Plant J. 76, 466–480.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.12311

All 87 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.