Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis: Current Understanding and New Challenges

Heikham Evelin, Thokchom Sarda Devi, Samta Gupta and 1 more

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00470

Abstract

Modern agriculture is facing twin challenge of ensuring global food security and executing it in a sustainable manner. However, the rapidly expanding salinity stress in cultivable areas poses a major peril to crop yield. Among various biotechnological techniques being used to reduce the negative effects of salinity, the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is considered to be an efficient approach for bio-amelioration of salinity stress. AMF deploy an array of biochemical and physiological mechanisms that act in a concerted manner to provide more salinity tolerance to the host plant. Some of the well-known mechanisms include improved nutrient uptake and maintenance of ionic homeostasis, superior water use efficiency and osmoprotection, enhanced photosynthetic efficiency, preservation of cell ultrastructure, and reinforced antioxidant metabolism. Molecular studies in past one decade have further elucidated the processes involved in amelioration of salt stress in mycorrhizal plants. The participating AMF induce expression of genes involved in Na+ extrusion to the soil solution, K+ acquisition (by phloem loading and unloading) and release into the xylem, therefore maintaining favorable Na+ : K+ ratio. Colonization by AMF differentially affects expression of plasma membrane and tonoplast aquaporins (PIPs and TIPs), which consequently improves water status of the plant. Formation of AM (arbuscular mycorrhiza) surges the capacity of plant to mend photosystem-II (PSII) and boosts quantum efficiency of PSII under salt stress conditions by mounting the transcript levels of chloroplast genes encoding antenna proteins involved in transfer of excitation energy. Furthermore, AM-induced interplay of phytohormones, including strigolactones, abscisic acid, giberellic acid, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid have also been associated with the salt tolerance mechanism. This review comprehensively covers major research advances on physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms implicated in AM-induced salt stress tolerance in plants. The review identifies the challenges involved in the application of AM in alleviation of salt stress in plants in order to improve crop productivity.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Worldwide, soil salinity is becoming a significant problem as it is encountered in all climates. Amongst the various salts present in the soil, NaCl is the most prevalent one. Soils are rendered saline due to deposition of salt either by natural (primary) or anthropogenic (secondary) processes. Primary processes include weathering of parent rocks, deposition from sea water and atmospheric deposition. Secondary processes include poor drainage facilities, irrigation with brackish groundwater, continuous irrigation for long durations, improper management of water, and cultural methods in irrigated agriculture. In addition, growing annual plants with shallow root-systems in place of deep-rooted perennial flora raises the water table leading to rise of saline groundwater. It is projected that around one billion hectares (ha) traversing more than 100 countries encounter salinity problems. Soil salinity is rapidly increasing with an estimated yearly addition of 0.3–1.5 million ha of farmland thereby decreasing crop production by more than 20%. It also renders another 20–46 million ha with decreased capacity for production. On the other hand, the earth is home to 7.7 billion people with addition of 83 million people every year at the rate of 1.09%. Therefore, achieving food security for the growing population amidst the declining farmland is one of the most important missions for modern agriculture.

High salt deposition in the soil results in osmotic as well as specific ion effects, which further lead to secondary oxidative stress in plants. Thus, salinity shows adverse effects on germination, growth, and reproduction of plants that subsequently diminish crop yield.

Plants have evolved to be a highly flexible system which can adjust its morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms to survive and sustain the changing environment. To counter the problems of salinity, plants exhibit growth plasticity (morphological and developmental pattern change), accumulation of compatible osmolytes to maintain turgor as well as prevent ultrastructural damage, ion-homeostasis, regulation of water uptake and enhanced water use efficiency, enhanced photosynthesis, detoxification of ROS through antioxidant enzymes and molecules, and induction of phytohormones. However, these adaptive strategies become inefficient to cope with the rapidly increasing salinity.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi establish a symbiotic union with roots of 80% land plants. This symbiosis constitutes a distinctive system with more efficiency than roots alone for uptake and transfer of mineral nutrients from the soil. The plant associated extramatrical hyphae of AMF can extent up to 100 m g-1 of soil, and enhance the plant’s ability to explore soil. These hyphae are leaner than roots, hence facilitate mining of water-filled pores, which otherwise are inaccessible to roots. Owing to this, AM can boost several mechanisms in plant to manage salt stress. Formation of AM has been reported to – (i) improve nutrient acquisition and maintain ionic homeostasis; (ii) improve water uptake and maintain osmotic equilibrium in plants; (iii) induce antioxidant system to prevent damage by ROS; (iv) protect photosynthetic apparatus and enhance photosynthetic efficiency; and (v) modulate phytohormone profile to minimize salt effects on growth and development (Figure 1). These effects act in coordination to improve plant’s resilience to salinity stress. These ameliorative effects can be evaluated in terms of improved plant growth exhibited by mycorrhizal (M) in comparison to NM plants. In the past decade, significant progress has been made to understand these mechanisms. This review comprehensively covers all biochemical and physiological changes that occur in plants that are inoculated with AM fungi and exposed to salt stress. It essentially takes stock of the advances made in the last decade toward better understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to salt stress alleviation in M plants. These include molecular bases for higher K+:Na+ ratio and higher concentration of N in M plants via regulation of transporters; maintenance of efficient water status via differential regulation of aquaporin genes (PIPs and TIPs); and elucidation of better photosynthetic efficiency via upregulation of RuBisCo gene as well as protection of PSII by upregulation of genes encoding D1 and D2 proteins of PSII. It updates the role of AM in influencing interplay of phytohormones in plants subjected to salt stress. Finally, it identifies the gaps in the understanding of the mechanisms, and presents the research challenges to be met in the future studies.

Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in M Plants

The ability of plants to tolerate salinity stress is usually evaluated in terms of biomass produced. Several studies have highlighted that AMF imparts salinity tolerance in host plants by virtue of higher biomass as compared to NM plants. AMF colonization enhanced biomass in Trigonella foenum-graecum, Oryza sativa, Medicago sativa, Gossypium hirsutum, Elaeagnus angustifolia, and Chrysanthemum morifolium. Higher biomass subsequently leads to dilution of Na+ and Cl-, and manifests as better crop yield.

Alteration in Root Architecture

Root system, being the plant structure responsible for uptake of water and nutrients, is crucial for enhancing plant resistance to salt stress. It is also the organ that regulates salt acquisition and translocation. In the presence of salt in the rhizosphere, plants experience a decline in primary root growth due to salt-induced inhibition of cell division and elongation of root epidermal cells while lateral root development gets initiated. In fact, it is well established that AMF colonization can improve plant’s adaptive ability by modifying the structure of root according to the requirements of time and space. observed that the length, surface area, and projected area of the root were more in M than the NM Citrus plants. reported greater root length and biomass in M than NM Jatropha curcas plants. Similar observations have been reported in Trigonella foenum-graecum, Medicago sativa, Ephedra aphylla, and Cucurbita pepo var. pepo. Better root system enables the plant to track non-saline areas for water and minerals until exploitation of salt areas become indispensable.

Nutrient Acquisition and Ionic Homeostasis

Excess salt (Na+ and Cl-) in the soil affects availability of nutrients by imposing competition during uptake, translocation or apportioning within the plant. Therefore, high Na+ and Cl- concentrations in the soil solution may suppress nutrient associated activities and result in undesired ratios of Na+:Ca2+, Na+:K+, and Ca2+:Mg2+. Such a phenomenon can lead to imbalance in ionic composition of the plant, thereby affecting plant’s physiological traits. However, AMF colonization has been shown to improve nutrient uptake and maintain ionic homeostasis in host plants grown in saline soils (Table 1). In fact, it has been assessed that the extramatrical hyphae of AMF can supply up to 80, 25, 10, 25, and 60% of plant’s P (phosphorus), N (nitrogen), K (potassium), Zn (zinc), and Cu (copper), respectively. AMF colonization also influences the concentration and profile of organic acids and polyamines in plants. Organic acids play important role in lowering soil electrical conductivity and increasing the availability of N, P, and K in soil. Polyamines help in retaining ion homeostasis in plant cells by enhancing the uptake of nutrients and water.

Phosphorus

Salinization renders P unavailable to plants due to its precipitation with other cations, such as Ca2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+ depending upon the pH of the soil environment, thereby creating salt-induced P deficiency in plants. This results in stunted growth of the plant and the older leaves die prematurely. However, AMF can significantly improve P acquisition for better growth and development of host plant (Table 1). Enhanced P acquisition in M plants is attributed to – (i) increased availability of P in the soil due to secretion of acid and alkaline phosphatases by hyphae that liberates P from its bound form; (ii) maintenance of intrinsic phosphate concentration (Pi) by forming polyphosphates inside the hyphae; (iii) ability of AMF to take up P at lower threshold owing to the expression of high affinity phosphate transporter genes (GvPT, GiPT, and GmosPT); and (iv) sustained movement of P into the roots as AMF are capable of accumulating vast amounts of absorbed P than roots. Thus in M plants, effective P uptake aids in – (i) preserving the integrity of cell membrane; (ii) reducing leakage of ions; (iii) compartmentalization of toxic ions in vacuoles and; (iv) selective uptake of ions, consequently reducing the adverse effects of salinity.

K+:Na+ Ratio

Sodium and potassium ions, due to their similar physico-chemical nature, compete at the transport sites for entry into the symplast. Therefore, in saline soils where concentration of Na+ in rhizosphere is very high, K+ uptake faces a stiff competition from Na+, eventually decreasing K+:Na+ ratio in the cytosol. Low K+:Na+ ratio in the cell subsequently disrupts protein synthesis, enzyme activity, photosynthesis, turgor maintenance, and stomatal movement. The integrity and selectivity of root membrane are also altered by Na+.

High Na+:K+ ratio in plants indicates a higher level of stress. Therefore, plants must consistently maintain low Na+:K+ to be able to resist the deleterious effects of salinity. One of the significant advantages of favorable K+:Na+ ratio is the protection of photosynthetic tissues by inhibition of Na+ entry into them, a pivotal trait involved in overcoming salinity stress in glycophytes. In fact, photosynthetic organs constitute a major site for maintaining desirable K+:Na+ ratio. This, in turn, determines the photosynthetic ability, and hence development and productivity of the plant under saline conditions.

Mycorrhizal plants have unfailingly shown higher K+:Na+ ratio than their NM counterparts under salt stress conditions atleast in reported studies (Table 1). M plants can control Na+ translocation to aboveground parts as well as regulate internal concentrations of Na+. This is attributed to M plant’s ability to sequester Na+ into the vacuoles or exclude it from the cytosol. The toxic effects of Na+ in apoplast are lesser with respect to cytoplasm. Furthermore, AM facilitates host plant to retract Na+ from xylem, and divert it away from photosynthetic tissues to roots. In this regard, it is interesting to note that, M plants have an added advantage over their NM counterparts as salinity induces accumulation of glomalin in participating AMF. Glomalin, a glycoprotein has been described as a heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) homolog and is hypothesized to participate in lowering cytosolic damages due to Na+-mediated protein misfolding. The strong correlation between salinity and production of glomalin only strengthens our understanding of AM protection of plants under salt stress.

Recent studies have explained the molecular bases of high K+:Na+ ratio in M plants. Mycorrhizal Oryza sativa plants were able to compartmentalize Na+ into the vacuole via up regulation of OsNHX3 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger), and mediate efflux of Na+ from cytosol to apoplastic spaces via higher expression of OsSOS1 (salt overly sensitive) and OsHKT2;1 (high affinity potassium transporter). NHXs are vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters present in roots and leaves that help in sequestering Na+ in the vacuole. SOS1 are plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporters responsible for secretion of Na+ from the cytosol beyond plasma membrane, their reallocation in roots and shoots, and restraining them from getting into the photosynthetic organs. HKT are Na+/K+ transporters responsible for diverting Na+ from photosynthetic tissues to roots, and confiscating Na+ from the xylem (Figure 2). It is proposed that the functions of SOS1 and HKT are synchronized to bring Na+ homeostasis and apportioning among the plant organs. Moreover, the level of stress is crucial in regulating the expression of a HKT gene. For instance, OsHKT1;5 gene expression increased seven-fold in M rice plants at 75 mM NaCl; however, its expression remained more or less same in NM plants at higher salinity level.

In Robinia pseudoacacia roots, under salinity stress, AM symbiosis enabled exclusion of Na+ from root cells, unloading of Na+ from xylem, and translocation of K+ to the shoots. These effects were associated with the up regulation of root RpSOS1, RpSKOR, and RpHKT1. SKOR (outwardly rectifying K+ channel) is involved in the translocation of K+ toward shoot through xylem (Figure 2).

Nitrogen

Plants absorb N as nitrate (NO32-) and ammonium (NH4+) ions. However, salinity conditions interfere with their uptake by immobilizing them. While NO32- uptake is challenged by Cl-, NH4+ absorption faces competition from Na+ at the membrane. Salt-induced disruption of membrane proteins that change plasma membrane integrity also affects the uptake of NO32- and NH4+. This competition results in a low flux of NO32- from soil to roots leading to reduced activity of NR, as it is a substrate-inducible enzyme. Several studies have reported that AMF colonization helps in increasing N uptake under stress conditions (Table 1). In fact, AMF hyphae have been reported to supply up to 25% of plant’s N. Improved nitrate uptake in M plants is attributed to AMF-facilitated maintenance of membrane stability and increased NR activity. Higher NR activity in M plants can be explained by – (i) the sustained phosphate supply to the enzyme; (ii) a higher flux of nitrate (substrate), mediated by extramatrical mycelium of AMF; and (iii) regulation of NR activity. Recently, demonstrated that higher nitrogen uptake in M plants under salt stress is due to higher expression of nitrate (NRT1.1, NAR2.2) and ammonium transporters (AMT1.1 and AMT1.2) in M durum Triticum aestivum plants (colonized with a mixture of Rhizophagus irregularis and Funneliformis mosseae). NRT1.1 is a dual affinity transporter protein that is responsible for both low and high affinity nitrate uptake in roots while NAR2.2 is a protein that takes part in HATs (high affinity transporter systems) by actively interacting with the genes involved in effective NO32- transport. However, in a prior study, it was observed that AMF symbiosis significantly up regulated the expression of NRT1.1, NRT2, NAR2.2, AMT1.2, and AMT2.1 in durum Triticum aestivum only when grown under N-limiting conditions.

Ca2+:Na+ and Ca2+:Mg2+ Ratio

One of the parameters to measure salt stress in plants is to determine Ca2+:Na+ ratio. Under salt stress, an elevated Na+ concentration in the rhizosphere hampers the absorption of Ca2+ by replacing them in cell wall and plasma membrane. This results in translocation of less Ca2+, thereby reducing Ca2+:Na+ ratio in salt stressed plants. Low Ca2+:Na+ ratio decreases hydraulic conductivity and cell turgor, and disturbs Ca2+ signaling. Ca2+ uptake is also challenged by the presence of Mg2+. Magnesium is a macronutrient and is the central ion of the chlorophyll molecule. It is responsible for harvesting light for photosynthesis. It is also required for proper functioning of many enzymes, such as RNA polymerases, phosphatases, carboxylases, ATPases, protein kinases, and glutathione synthase. Several studies have reported that Mg2+ concentration in plants decreases under salt stress conditions (Table 1). However, M plants possess higher concentration of Mg2+ than NM plants. It is interesting to note that M plants, despite accumulating more Mg2+ than NM plants, are also shown to have desirable Ca2+:Na+ ratio by improving Ca2+ uptake under salt stress conditions. This AM effect is yet to be understood and requires further studies to unravel the mechanisms involved.

Micronutrients

The acquisition of micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe) by plants is exceedingly affected by salinity. Salinity decreases the solubility and mobility of micronutrients, such as Cu and Fe, thereby creating a depletion zone around the root. The depletion zone around the root results in decrease in uptake of the micronutrients by plants. However, M plants showed higher concentration of these micronutrients than NM plants (Table 1). This may be credited to – (i) widespread root-hyphal system that shortens the path of nutrients’ entry into plant; (ii) fungal mycelium serving as a substrate for nutrients to bind; (iii) AMF-induced changes in the pH of the rhizosphere, which modulates nutrient solubility and thus their availability; (iv) increase in sink size of Cu and Zn due to higher shoot P, which subsequently instigate nutrient uptake and translocation to shoots; (v) up regulation of the expression of transporter gene of these nutrients, for example, a plasma membrane Zn transporter gene, MtZIP2 is up regulated upon colonization by AMF.

The role of AMF in maintaining ionic balance is being elucidated at molecular level. However, much remains to be investigated on AMF-influenced higher Ca2+:Na+, Ca2+:Mg2+ ratios as well as uptake of micronutrients.

Osmoregulation

Salt stress causes cellular dehydration by lowering turgor pressure in plant cells. In order to negate this effect, plants employ osmoregulation as a mechanism to tolerate salt stress. The buildup of Na+ and Cl- in soil decreases the water potential of the soil. In such a condition, plants must retort to lower water potential in order to maintain a favorable gradient for water flow from soil into roots, and prevent dehydration of cells. To accomplish this, plants start to accumulate osmolytes, such as proline, betaine, polyamines, sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and trehalose. Osmolytes are small organic solutes that are water soluble and non-toxic at high concentrations and are also known as compatible solutes. Under salt stress, M plants have been shown to possess higher osmotic potential than their NM counterparts due to accumulation of more osmolytes (Figure 3). The fundamental role of these osmolytes is osmotic adjustment In addition, they are also involved in ROS quenching, maintenance of membrane integrity, and enzyme as well as protein stabilization, hence are also known as osmoprotectants. The osmolytes and their role in improving salt tolerance in M plants are discussed subsequently.

Proline

Salt stress tolerance mechanisms often include accumulation of proline. Proline can scavenge ROS and stabilize DNA, proteins and membranes, and reduce NaCl-induced enzyme denaturation. In addition, it also delivers carbon, nitrogen, and energy. This, in turn, supports plant during stress and aids in its recovery from stress. The reports on impact of AMF on proline concentration in salt stressed plants have been inconsistent. Many studies reported higher proline content in M plants compared to NM plants, while others have reported lower proline content in M plants (Table 2). Higher proline content in M plants has been attributed to – (i) increase in the expression of gene encoding P5CS involved in proline biosynthesis; (ii) higher activity of the enzyme P5CS; (iii) higher activity of the enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase, that is responsible for synthesizing glutamate, the precursor of proline; and (iv) inactivation of proline dehydrogenase, an enzyme that catalyze the degradation of proline. Besides its role as an osmoprotectant, proline is also considered as a stress marker. Therefore, M plants may accumulate less proline as they experience reduced stress.

Trehalose (Tre)

Trehalose (α-D-glucopyranosyl-1,1-α-D-glucopyranoside) is a non-reducing storage disaccharide that regulates carbohydrate metabolism. It acts as a stress protection metabolite by maintaining K+:Na+ ratio, scavenging ROS, and increasing the concentration of soluble sugars in plants. Salinity enhances the buildup of trehalose and AM symbiosis can further boost the accumulation of this osmolyte. reported that M plants under salt stress accumulate more trehalose than their NM counterparts. Higher trehalose concentration in M plants can be attributed to AMF-facilitated increased activities of TPS and TPP and lower activity of TRE. TPS and TPP are enzymes responsible for the biosynthesis of trehalose while TRE is a trehalose degrading enzyme.

Organic Acids

Organic acids are important osmolytes in plant vacuoles, and the regulation of their metabolism plays an important role in providing tolerance to salt stress. AMF colonization can also influence the concentration and profile of organic acids in plants. Under salt stress, M Zea mays plants accumulated more of acetic, citric, fumaric, malic, and oxalic acids, whereas concentration of formic acid and succinic acid decreased, while there was no difference in lactic acid concentration as compared to NM plants. However, the mechanisms underlying changes in organic acids in M plants are not known and calls for investigation. It is speculated that AMF impart protection to the enzymes involved in organic acid biosynthesis.

Polyamines

Polyamines are aliphatic, low molecular weight polycations that have been indicated to participate in cellular osmoregulation in plants under salt stress. Under salt stress, polyamines accumulate in plants as compatible solutes. Major polyamines that accumulate under salt stress are putrescine (Put, diamine), spermidine (Spd, triamine), and spermine (Spm, tetraamine). However, it remains unclear as to which polyamine is responsible more in imparting salt tolerance. AMF has also been found to modulate polyamine pool to help plants tolerate salt stress. Mycorrhizal plants had higher Spd+Spm:Put ratio than NM Trigonella foenum-graecum plants. The effect of AM on individual polyamine varies with genotype and intensity of stress. However, the mechanism underlying AMF-facilitated modulation of polyamines for salt tolerance in plants is yet to be deciphered, and further investigations should focus polyamines metabolism.

Sugars

Accumulation of TSSs such as, glucose, sucrose, dextrins, and maltose in salt stressed plants is another way of osmotic adjustment. They play a vital role in osmoprotection and as carbon storage. Plants direct the synthesis of TSS from starch and sucrose by upregulating the activities of sucrose anabolizing enzymes. Starch is converted into dextrins and maltose by α- and β-amylases, respectively. SPS and SS catalyze the synthesis of sucrose while AI catalyzes the breakdown of sucrose to glucose. During salt stress, sucrose undergoes decomposition in order to meet the requirement of glucose. Salt stress induced TSS accumulation is further enhanced by AM symbiosis. The higher accumulation of TSS in M plants has been credited to – (i) higher photosynthetic efficiency; (ii) higher activities of α- and β-amylases, SS, and AI; (iii) higher organic acid content; and (iv) carbon requirement of AMF. reported that salt tolerant M Cicer arietinum cultivar (PBG 5) accumulated more sugars than its salt sensitive M counterparts (BG256) indicating that accumulation of TSS can enhance tolerance to salt stress. This is accompanied by higher activities of α- and β-amylases in M plants, indicating rapid hydrolysis of starch to glucose in salt tolerant M Cicer arietinum. The activity of SPS as well as SS and AI increased simultaneously indicating that sucrose is synthesized upon salt stress, and concomitantly converted to glucose leading to increase in TSS concentration.

The role of AM symbiosis in reinforcing osmotic adjustment in plants under salt stress via enhanced accumulation of osmolyte is now well-understood. However, these mechanisms are yet to be explicated at the molecular level. Therefore, directing future research in unraveling the molecular bases of osmolyte accumulation in M plants will help in all-inclusive understanding of the mechanisms.

Oxidative Stress

Salinity mediated hyperosmotic and hyperionic stress induce another secondary stress in plants, called oxidative stress. It results due to the disturbance of equilibrium between ROS generation and its diminution by several antioxidants. ROS consists of a group of chemically reactive oxygen molecules such as hydroxyl radical (OH-), H2O2,.O2-, and O2-. ROS are generated as an after-effect of disengaged pathways in plant metabolism that causes the transfer of high energy electrons to molecular oxygen. Excessive generation of ROS disturbs various cell functions by attacking several biomolecules such as nucleic acid, protein, and membrane lipid. Salinity increases the level of lipid peroxidation resulting in higher membrane permeability and loss of ions from the cells.

Plants employ a two-pronged system to counteract the adverse consequences of ROS; enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidative systems. The enzymatic system consists of SOD, POX, CAT, APX, and GR. Non-enzymatic antioxidant molecules such as AsA, glutathione (GSH), carotenoids, and α-tocopherol also take part in quenching of toxic by-products of ROS. In fact, salinity tolerance in plants has been associated with the induction of antioxidative pathways and diminution of oxidative damage (Figure 4).

In the last few years, several studies have shown that one of the mechanisms AMF employ to alleviate salinity stress is an efficient ROS scavenging system. AMF augment the activities of antioxidant enzymes as well as increase the production of antioxidant molecules, ensuring a better ROS scavenging system. AMF colonization increases the concentrations of antioxidant molecules such as, α-tocopherols, AsA, GSH, and carotenoids in plants. High α-tocopherol content limits auto-oxidation of lipids, thus preventing M plants from lipid peroxidation. High α-tocopherol content in M plants can be attributed to improved production of tocopheroxyl radicals, facilitated by the high AsA content. Higher GSH levels and GR activity result in higher AsA levels in plants. GSH enables plants to directly scavenge more.O2- and H2O2 as well as other ROS, and recycle more AsA via the AsA-glutathione cycle. Carotenoids also prevent.O2-production.

Mycorrhizal plants are reported to possess higher activities of enzymatic antioxidants under both saline and non-saline conditions. Elevated SOD activity was reported in M plants in comparison to their NM counterparts (Table 3). Higher SOD activity is associated with higher tolerance to salinity. Higher SOD enables detoxification of more O2- to H2O2, that is further detoxified to H2O. The conversion of H2O2 to H2O can be catalyzed by enzymes, such as CAT, APX, and POX. Mycorrhizal plants are reported to have higher activities of H2O2 scavenging enzymes. Higher AsA concentration in M plants induces higher activity of APX, that is consecutively reliant on enhanced GR activity in M plants. This results in higher GSH pool, which ultimately depletes DHA concentration and recycles AsA. Improved efficiency of GR maintains higher GSH:GSSG and NADP+:NADPH ratios and lowers superoxide radical production by sustaining the photosynthetic electron transport. Higher activities of these enzymes in M plants are partially explained by better nutritional status. Mycorrhizal plants have been shown to have higher concentrations of micronutrients, such as Cu, Zn, Mn, and Fe. On the other hand, these enzymes are metalloenzymes whose activities are also governed by the availability of these micronutrients. However, the activities of these enzymes are dependent on various factors such as plant species, plant tissues, AMF species, level of salinity, and duration of stress.

Additionally, lower oxidative stress in M plants is also due to improved concentrations of osmolytes, such as proline, polyamine, and glycinebetaine. They bring about stabilization of sub-cellular components of cell membranes such as lipids and proteins, quenching of free radicals, and buffer cellular redox potential under salinity stress.

Water Status

High salt concentration in the rhizosphere also imposes physiological drought in plants. Salt immobilizes water and renders it unavailable for the plants. observed that M Malus hupehensis seedlings maintained relatively higher leaf turgidity and lower leaf osmotic potential compared to NM plants, when subjected to salt stress. reported higher relative water content in M as compared to NM Robinia pseudoacacia plants under salt stress. This observation is explained by improved hydraulic conductivity of M plants attributed to AMF-induced altered root morphology, and the ability of M plants to explore macroelements well beyond the depletion zone facilitated by the extensive extramatrical mycelium of AMF. In addition, M plants also accumulate more compatible solutes to adjust the osmotic potential and enable efficient water usage by host plants. Better water status in M plants may be explicated by the AMF regulated expression of aquaporin genes present in leaves and roots of salt stressed plants. However, each aquaporin gene in roots of M plants may respond differently to salt stress. For instance, in Lycopersicon esculentum, AMF colonization downregulated LePIP1 gene while the same gene was upregulated in Lactuca sativa. Recently, described the expression profile of aquaporin genes (RpPIP1;1, RpPIP1;3, RpPIP2;1, RpTIP1;1, RpTIP1;3, RpTIP2;1) in leaves and roots of M and NM Robinia pseudoacacia subjected to saline stress. Hence, the effect of AM symbiosis on transcription of aquaporin genes varies with the plant species, type of plant tissue they are expressed, and level of salinity. Furthermore, potential of different aquaporin genes to transport water and other solutes may differ and depend on their location in the cell.

Photosynthesis

Salt stress impedes photosynthesis and brings an enormous decline in crop productivity. Salt stress affects photosynthesis in several ways (Table 4). Salt-induced osmotic stress leads to lowering of leaf area, coupled with a decrease in stomatal and mesophyll conductance, which limits CO2 availability and assimilation. This consequently decreases the supply of CO2 to RuBisCO. In addition to this, RuBisCO being sensitive to Cl-, loses its activity under salt stress. The decline in CO2 assimilation also leads to accumulation of excess energy that leads to increased accumulation of electrons in the thylakoid membranes. To dissipate this energy, PSII loses massive amount of electrons and causes injury of the photosynthetic tissues, which subsequently affects the net photosynthetic rate. Furthermore, salt stress has also been shown to degrade D1 and D2 proteins of PSII reaction center. These proteins are structural components of the PSII reaction center and play fundamental roles in phosphorylation of proteins coupled with flow of electrons. A decline in the activity of photosynthetic pigment synthesizing enzymes is another way by which salt stress affects photosynthesis resulting in decreased concentration of photosynthetic pigments. The low concentration of chlorophyll may also be attributed to salt-induced low uptake of Mg2+, destruction of pigment-protein complexes due to salt-induced augmentation of chlorophyllase enzyme activity, and reduction of de novo protein synthesis.

Plants can safeguard the photosystems from light induced inhibition and damage in many ways. These include minimizing harvesting of light and dispersion of excess energy by non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) or cyclic electron flow. AM symbiosis is known to bolster up these mechanisms and alleviate the negative effects of salinity on plant photosynthetic capacity. As compared to NM plants, M plants have higher net photosynthetic rate, more quantum yield (Fv/Fm; Fv = Fm − F0; Fm = maximal fluorescence; F0 = minimal fluorescence), and actual quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) photochemistry under salt stress (Table 4). AM symbiosis combats the negative effects of salt stress on photosynthesis in following ways – (i) improved water status in M plants results in maintaining larger leaf area and higher stomatal conductance, and consequently better assimilation of CO2. Furthermore, aquaporins besides transporting water, can also promote diffusion of CO2 across plasma membrane of the mesophyll cells; (ii) ability of M plants to abate intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) ensures protection of the photosynthetic apparatus. This is possible due to enhanced RuBisCO activity in M plants owing to higher expression of the large subunit of RuBisCO, RprbcL gene. However, up regulation of gene expression may not always translate to increased RuBisCO activity due to delay in protein translation after gene transcription; (iii) AM symbiosis empowers host plants to maintain the integrity of PSII by its prompt action to repair salt-induced degradation of D1 and D2 proteins. The genes encoding D1 (RppsbA) and D2 (RppsbD) were found to be up regulated by AM symbiosis under salinity conditions. This may also be due to higher concentration of polyamines and glycinebetaine in M plants. Glycinebetaine stabilizes PSII pigment-protein complexes as well as protect the activities of enzymes such as, RuBisCO and rubisco activase that are responsible for fixing CO2. In fact, previous studies have reported that maintenance of PSII activity can help plants to adapt to abiotic stresses; (iv) Mycorrhizal plants maintain higher chlorophyll and carotenoid concentration by improving the uptake of Mg2+. Moreover, an increase in NPQ can limit Fv/Fm. However, M plants are reported to have lower NPQ. Thus, AM symbiosis enhances photosynthetic efficiency by proficient conversion of harvested light into chemical energy, and minimizing NPQ as compared to NM plants.

Furthermore, salinity also increases the activities of carbon metabolizing enzymes such as, pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK), phospho-enol-pyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), NADP-MDH, and NAD-MDH. Higher activities of these enzymes are required for better plant growth to overcome stress conditions. Mycorrhizal plants were found to possess lower activities of these enzymes suggesting lower level of stress. On the other hand, salinity decreased the activity of NADP-ME and AMF colonization induced the activity of this enzyme. Higher NADP-ME in M plants can increase carbon metabolism and contribute to stress tolerance.

Hormonal Regulation

Phytohormones regulate growth and development of plants under ambient as well as stressed conditions, and hence are also known as growth regulators. They are derived from plant biosynthetic pathways and can act at the site of production or away from it. Phytohormones such as, ABA, auxin, BR, CK, GA, JA, SA, SLs, NO, and triazoles have been implicated to play significant roles in imparting salt-stress tolerance in plants. In order to initiate suitable plant response to environmental stimulus, these hormones interplay amongst themselves to modulate biochemical and physiological processes that translate into mediation of growth, development, nutrient allocation, and source/sink transitions. However, despite the large amount of literature available on phytohormones’ role in salinity tolerance, this aspect has found little interest in studies pertaining to AMF-mediated salinity tolerance in plants. Moreover, during AM symbiosis, ABA, auxin, JA, and SA are known to act as signaling molecules. Therefore, it is postulated that these hormones play significant roles in improving plant tolerance to salinity stress.

Strigolactones consist of a new class of phytohormones that are involved in many aspects of plant development such as coordination of root growth and architecture according to the nutrient availability in soil, suppression of secondary branches in shoot, stimulation of internode length in a cross talk with auxin, regulation of leaf senescence, and induction of AM symbiosis. They also play regulatory roles against abiotic stress. In order to exert its full effect, SLs need to modulate and interact with other phytohormones, especially auxin and ABA. In Sesbania cannabina seedlings, reported that H2O2 and SLs signaling are involved in AM mediated salt stress alleviation. observed that that in contrast to NM plants, AM colonization in S. cannabina maintained positive correlation between ABA and SLs. They proposed that AM colonization intensively altered ABA catabolism. This high ABA in M plants, protects it from salt stress by inducing the production of SLs via H2O2 signaling. On the perception of ABA signal, there is rapid production of H2O2 in the apoplast. The accumulation of H2O2 depends on NADPH oxidase activity, which also plays a significant role in ABA signaling. This subsequently leads to increase in accumulation of SLs, and ultimately enhanced salt tolerance.

Exogenous applications of GA and SA have displayed boost in salinity tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum and Cicer arietinum, respectively. Foliar spray of GA3 resulted in better nutrient acquisition and manifold increase in GA concentration in M Solanum lycopersicum indicating that GA can promote salinity tolerance. AMF colonization has also been shown to impart positive influence on the endogenous concentrations of GA. Seed priming with SA helped M Cicer arietinum to tolerate salinity stress by improving ionic homeostasis, modulating carbohydrate metabolism, and improving growth and yield. In fact, SA application also promoted AMF colonization and vice versa. Salicylic acid, in conjunction with AMF have also been shown to improve salinity tolerance by reducing lipid peroxidation while increasing concentration of proline, proteins, reduced sugars, and K+ ion contents in shoots of Ocimum basilicum. In a recent study, have reported an increase in concentration of JA in Cucumis sativus under salt stress. JA is a phytohormone belonging to octadecanoid family and is involved in plant’s response to biotic as well as abiotic stress. also reported increased concentrations of JA, 12-OH-JA, and OPDA (precursor of JA) in Digitaria eriantha under salt stress. Their concentrations were further boosted in the presence of Rhizophagus irregularis. Thus, JA has also been implicated to play a key role in imparting salinity tolerance to plants. The underlying mechanisms of GA, SA, and JA in improving salinity tolerance in M plants are yet to be fully understood. Therefore, more studies are required to be directed toward AM-salinity experiments involving phytohormones.

Challenges

This review highlights the mechanisms that AM symbiosis facilitates to impart salt stress tolerance in plants. However, there are several challenges that future research should address for comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms. The challenges are briefly discussed below:

There is no debate on the role of AMF facilitating osmoregulation. However, studies pertaining to osmoregulation are mainly limited to the evaluation of concentrations of osmolytes. There is a need to elucidate these phenomena at the molecular level by investigating the genes that code for these molecules and their biosynthetic enzymes.

AMF have been consistently shown to improve nutrient uptake and maintain ionic homeostasis. However, these reports are focused on determining the concentrations of nutrients in tissues and evaluating ratios, such as K+:Na+, Ca2+:Na+, and Ca2+:Mg2+. Significant progress has been made to understand the mechanisms involved in maintenance of K+:Na+ ratio by studying uptake and translocation of K+ and Na+ ions via transporters. However, there are very few reports that elucidate the uptake of nutrients at the molecular level. CNGCs are non-selective cation channels that take up K+, Na+, and Ca2+. Till now, there are no investigations on CNGCs in M plants. Therefore, identification of ion transporters and expression studies can provide a better understanding of ion homeostasis in M plants.

Sulfur is a major component of various molecules, such as cysteine, a sulfur donor in ABA synthesis; and glutathione, an antioxidant molecule that helps in detoxification of ROS, thereby helping plants cope with salinity stress. Plants absorb sulfur as sulfate via SULTR. It is also known that AMF can improve sulfur nutrition by enhanced uptake and its translocation to the root in low-sulfate environments. However, no studies are available on the influence of AMF on plant sulfate uptake regulation or SULTR genes under saline conditions.

Studies regarding the role of phytohormones are limited and inconclusive. For instance, far and few studies with respect to AMF-salinity have focused on ABA and SLs. Phytohormones, such as BR, JA, NO, and SA have been indicated to improve plant’s tolerance to salinity; however, they are yet to be explored as potential candidates that impart salinity tolerance to M plants. Moreover, SA and JA have been well documented as signals to alert neighboring plants upon biotic stress. On the other hand, M plants are well connected to each other owing to the existence of common mycorrhizal network. Therefore, future research should investigate if SA and JA play any role in eliciting stress signals to its neighbors.

Under salt stress, lipid metabolism undergoes changes that can be associated with profound alterations in cell membrane integrity, composition, and function. Though lipid peroxidation has been elucidated in AM-salinity studies, lipid metabolism in salt stressed M plants is yet to be investigated.

Salt stress causes endocytosis. Earlier, reported that NaCl treatment increased the incidence of endocytosis significantly in Trigonella. The vesicular surface increases the surface area for higher exchange capacity (K+ versus Na+), protecting plants from ionic toxicities, imbalances, or interactions between substances in the cytoplasm.

Cell wall of a plant is the interface between plant and environment. Therefore, it is the first organelle that, senses, perceives, and responds to salt stress. Hence, it is crucial that active cell wall integrity is preserved so as to allow plants to sense and respond to stress rapidly. Thus, it necessitates that the composition, biosynthesis of its components and organization into a membrane under stress conditions be well-informed. Therefore, future research should direct studies that evaluate how AMF influence the cell wall under saline conditions.

Directing future AM-salinity research to understand the above-mentioned challenges will immensely improve our understanding of the mechanisms of AMF facilitated salinity tolerance in host plants in order to obtain maximum benefit from AM symbiosis under salinity stress.

Author Contributions

HE, TD, SG, and RK jointly conceptualized and wrote the manuscript, contributing major parts of the literature survey. All the authors have collectively reviewed the manuscript and approved it.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 188

  1. 1.

    Abd-Allah E. F. Hashem A. Alqarawi A. A. Bahkali A. H. Alwhibi M. S. (2015 ). Enhancing growth performance and systemic acquired resistance of medicinal plant Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22 274–283.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.03.004

  2. 2.

    Abdel-Fattah G. M. Asrar A. W. A. (2012 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal application to improve growth and tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants grown in saline soil. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34 267–277.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11738-011-0825-6

  3. 3.

    Abo-Doma A. Edrees S. Abdel-Aziz S. H. (2016 ). The effect of mycorrhiza growth and expression of some genes in barley. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 40 301–313.

    Not in our library10.21608/ejgc.2011.10794

  4. 4.

    Agusti J. Herold S. Schwarz M. Sanchez P. Ljung K. Dun E. A. (2011 ). Strigolactone signaling is required for auxin-dependent stimulation of secondary growth in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 13 20242–20247.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1111902108

  5. 5.

    Allen J. W. Shachar-Hill Y. (2009 ). Sulfur transfer through an arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol. 149 549–560.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.129866

  6. 6.

    Alqarawi A. A. Abd-Allah E. F. Hashem A. (2014 ). Alleviation of salt-induced adverse impact via mycorrhizal fungi in Ephedra aphylla Forssk. J. Plant Interact. 9 802–810.

    Not in our library10.1080/17429145.2014.949886

  7. 7.

    Ashraf M. Foolad M. R. (2007 ). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59 206–216.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006

  8. 8.

    Asins M. J. Villalta I. Aly M. M. Olias R. Álvarez De Morales P. A. Z. Huertas R. (2013 ). Two closely linked tomato HKT coding genes are positional candidates for the major tomato QTL involved in Na+/K+ homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ. 36 1171–1191.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.12051

  9. 9.

    Augé R. M. Toler H. D. Saxton A. M. (2014 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and osmotic adjustment in response to NaCl stress: a meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 5:562.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2014.00562

  10. 10.

    Azcon-G de Aguilar C. Azcón R. Barea J. M. (1979 ). Endomycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium as biological fertilisers for Medicago sativa in normal cultivation. Nature 279 325–327.

    Not in our library10.1038/279325a0

  11. 11.

    Baker N. R. (2008 ). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59 89–113.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759

  12. 12.

    Ballicora M. A. Iglesias A. A. Preiss J. (2004 ). ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase: a regulatory enzyme for plant starch synthesis. Photosynth. Res. 79 1–24.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:pres.0000011916.67519.58

  13. 13.

    Beltrano J. Ruscitti M. Arango M. C. Ronco M. (2013 ). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculation on plant growth, biological and physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in pepper grown under different salinity and P levels. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 13 123–141.

    Not in our library10.4067/s0718-95162013005000012

  14. 14.

    Benavídes M. P. Marconi P. L. Gallego S. M. Comba M. E. Tomaro M. L. (2000 ). Relationship between antioxidant defence systems and salt tolerance in Solanum tuberosum. Funct. Plant Biol. 27 273–278.

    Not in our library10.1071/pp99138

  15. 15.

    Bolan N. S. (1991 ). A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil 134 189–207.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00012037

  16. 16.

    Borde M. Dudhane M. Jite P. (2011 ). Growth photosynthetic activity and antioxidant responses of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal bajra (Pennisetum glaucum) crop under salinity stress condition. Crop Prot. 30 265–271.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.010

  17. 17.

    Briviba K. Klotz L. O. Sies H. (1998 ). Toxic and signaling effects of photochemically or chemically generated singlet oxygen in biological systems. Biol. Chem. 378 1259–1265.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Burleigh S. H. Kristensen B. K. Bechmann I. E. (2003 ). A plasma membrane zinc transporter from Medicago truncatula is up-regulated in roots by Zn fertilization, yet down-regulated by arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Mol. Biol. 52 1077–1088.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1025479701246

  19. 19.

    Campanelli A. Ruta C. De Mastro G. Morone-Fortunato I. (2013 ). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating salt stress in Medicago sativa L. var. icon. Symbiosis 59 65–76.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13199-012-0191-1

  20. 20.

    Chang B. Yang L. Cong W. Zu Y. Tang Z. (2014 ). The improved resistance to high salinity induced by trehalose is associated with ionic regulation and osmotic adjustment in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 77 140–148.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.02.001

  21. 21.

    Chang W. Sui X. Fan X. X. Jia T. T. Song F. Q. (2018 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates antioxidant response and ion distribution in salt-stressed Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings. Front. Microbiol. 9:652.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2018.00652

  22. 22.

    Chaves M. M. Flexas J. Pinheiro C. (2009 ). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 103 551–560.

    Not in our library10.1093/aob/mcn125

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Chen T. H. Murata N. (2011 ). Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ. 34 1–20.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02232.x

  25. 25.

    Chinnusamy V. Jagendorf A. Zhu J. K. (2005 ). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 45 437–448.

    Not in our library10.2135/cropsci2005.0437

  26. 26.

    Colmer T. D. Munns R. Flowers T. J. (2006 ). Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: future prospects. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45 1425–1443.

    Not in our library10.1071/ea04162

  27. 27.

    Crawford N. M. Glass A. D. (1998 ). Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 3 389–395.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01311-9

  28. 28.

    Cuin T. A. Bose J. Stefano G. Jha D. Tester M. Mancuso S. (2011 ). Assessing the role of root plasma membrane and tonoplast Na+/H+ exchangers in salinity tolerance in wheat: in planta quantification methods. Plant Cell Environ. 34 947–961.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02296.x

  29. 29.

    da Silva E. C. Nogueira R. J. M. C. de Araújo F. P. de Melo N. F. de Azevedo Neto A. D. (2008 ). Physiological responses to salt stress in young umbu plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 63 147–157.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.11.010

  30. 30.

    Davenport R. J. Muñoz-Mayor A. Jha D. Essah P. A. Rus A. Tester M. (2007 ). The Na+ transporter AtHKT1; 1 controls retrieval of Na+ from the xylem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 30 497–507.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01637.x

  31. 31.

    de Saint Germain A. Ligerot Y. Dun E. A. Pillot J. P. Ross J. J. Beveridge C. A. (2013 ). Strigolactones stimulate internode elongation independently of gibberellins. Plant Physiol. 163 1012–1025.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.113.220541

  32. 32.

    Doubnerová V. Ryšlavá H. (2011 ). What can enzymes of C4 photosynthesis do for C3 plants under stress? Plant Sci. 180 575–583.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.005

  33. 33.

    Duan J. J. Li J. Guo S. R. Kang Y. Y. (2008 ). Exogenous spermidine affects polyamine metabolism in salinity stressed Cucumis sativus roots and enhances short term salinity tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 165 1620–1635.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2007.11.006

  34. 34.

    El-Tayeb M. A. (2005 ). Response of barley grains to the interactive e. ect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant Growth Regul. 45 215–224.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10725-005-4928-1

  35. 35.

    Estrada B. Aroca R. Maathuis F. J. Barea J. M. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2013 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi native from a Mediterranean saline area enhance maize tolerance to salinity through improved ion homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ. 36 1771–1782.

    Not in our library10.1111/pce.12082

  36. 36.

    Evelin H. Giri B. Kapoor R. (2012 ). Contribution of Glomus intraradices inoculation to nutrient acquisition and mitigation of ionic imbalance in NaCl-stressed Trigonella foenum-graecum. Mycorrhiza 22 203–217.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-011-0392-0

  37. 37.

    Evelin H. Giri B. Kapoor R. (2013 ). Ultrastructural evidence for AMF mediated salt stress mitigation in Trigonella foenum-graecum. Mycorrhiza 23 71–86.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-012-0449-8

  38. 38.

    Evelin H. Kapoor R. (2014 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates antioxidant response in salt-stressed Trigonella foenum-graecum plants. Mycorrhiza 24 197–208.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-013-0529-4

  39. 39.

    Evelin H. Kapoor R. Giri B. (2009 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 104 1263–1280.

    Not in our library10.1093/aob/mcp251

  40. 40.

    Fahad S. Nie L. Chen Y. Wu C. Xiong D. Saud S. (2015 ). “Crop plant hormones and environmental stress,” in Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, ed. Lichtfouse E. (Cham: Springer), 371–400.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-09132-7_10

  41. 41.

    Felicia V. Russia P. Ingraffia R. Giambalvo D. Frenda A. S. Martinelli F. (2017 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis mitigates the negative effects of salinity on durum wheat. PLoS One 12:e0184158.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0184158

  42. 42.

    Filleur S. Dorbe M. F. Cerezo M. Orsel M. Granier F. Gojon A. (2001 ). An Arabidopsis T-DNA mutant affected in Nrt2 genes is impaired in nitrate uptake. FEBS Lett. 489 220224.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02096-8

  43. 43.

    Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] (2015 ). Status of the Worlds’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Main Report, United Nations. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Foyer C. H. Halliwell B. (1976 ). The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta 133 21–25.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00386001

  45. 45.

    Foyer C. H. Noctor G. (2005 ). Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 17 1866–1875.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.0335

  46. 46.

    Frechilla S. Lasa B. Ibarretre L. Lamfus C. Aparico-Tejo P. (2001 ). Pea responses to saline stress is affected by the source of nitrogen nutrition (ammonium or nitrate). Plant Growth Regul. 35 171–179.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1014487908495

  47. 47.

    Frosi G. Barros V. A. Oliveira M. T. Santos M. Ramos D. G. Maia L. C. (2016 ). Symbiosis with AMF and leaf Pi supply increases water deficit tolerance of woody species from seasonal dry tropical forest. J. Plant Physiol. 207 84–93.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2016.11.002

  48. 48.

    Frosi G. Barros V. A. Oliveira M. T. Santos M. Ramos D. G. Maia L. C. (2017 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and foliar phosphorus inorganic supply alleviate salt stress effects in physiological attributes, but only arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase biomass in woody species of a semiarid environment. Tree Physiol. 38 25–36.

    Not in our library10.1093/treephys/tpx105

  49. 49.

    Füzy A. Biró B. Tóth T. Hildebrandt U. Bothe H. (2008 ). Drought, but not salinity, determines the apparent effectiveness of halophytes colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Physiol. 165 1181–1192.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2007.08.010

  50. 50.

    Gadkar V. Rillig M. C. (2006 ). The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal protein glomalin is a putative homolog of heat shock protein 60. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 263 93–101.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00412.x

  51. 51.

    Gamalero E. Berta G. Massa N. Glick B. R. Lingua G. (2010 ). Interactions between Pseudomonas putida UW4 and Gigaspora rosea BEG9 and their consequences for the growth of cucumber under salt-stress conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108 236–245.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04414.x

  52. 52.

    Garg A. K. Kim J. K. Owens T. G. Ranwala A. P. Do Choi Y. Kochian L. V. (2002 ). Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 15898–15903.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.252637799

  53. 53.

    Garg N. Baher N. (2013 ). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in proline biosynthesis and metabolism of Cicer arietinum L. (chickpea) genotypes under salt stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32 767–778.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-013-9346-4

  54. 54.

    Garg N. Bhandari P. (2016a ). Interactive effects of silicon and arbuscular mycorrhiza in modulating ascorbate-glutathione cycle and antioxidant scavenging capacity in differentially salt-tolerant Cicer arietinum L. genotypes subjected to long-term salinity. Protoplasma 253 1325–1345.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-015-0892-4

  55. 55.

    Garg N. Bhandari P. (2016b ). Silicon nutrition and mycorrhizal inoculations improve growth, nutrient status, K+/Na+ ratio and yield of Cicer arietinum L. genotypes under salinity stress. Plant Growth Regul. 78 371–387.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10725-015-0099-x

  56. 56.

    Garg N. Bharti A. (2018 ). Salicylic acid improves arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, and chickpea growth and yield by modulating carbohydrate metabolism under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 28 727–746.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-018-0856-6

  57. 57.

    Garg N. Pandey R. (2016 ). High effectiveness of exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is reflected in improved rhizobial symbiosis and trehalose turnover in Cajanus cajan genotypes grown under salinity stress. Fungal Ecol. 21 57–67.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.funeco.2016.04.001

  58. 58.

    Gaymard F. Pilot G. Lacombe B. Bouchez D. Bruneau D. Boucherez J. (1998 ). Identification and disruption of a plant shaker-like outward channel involved in K+ release into the xylem sap. Cell 94 647–655.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81606-2

  59. 59.

    Geigenberger P. Stitt M. (1993 ). Sucrose synthase catalyses a readily reversible reaction in vivo in developing potato tubers and other plant tissues. Planta 189 329–339.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00194429

  60. 60.

    Gill S. S. Tuteja N. (2010 ). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 909–930.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016

  61. 61.

    Giri B. Mukerji K. G. (2004 ). Mycorrhizal inoculant alleviates salt stress in Sesbania aegyptiaca and Sesbania grandiflora under field conditions: evidence for reduced sodium and improved magnesium uptake. Mycorrhiza 14 307–312.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-003-0274-1

  62. 62.

    Graham J. H. Syvertsen J. P. (1984 ). Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on the hydraulic conductivity of roots of two citrus rootstocks. New Phytol. 97 277–284.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb04132.x

  63. 63.

    Grattan S. R. Grieve C. M. (1992 ). Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plants grown in saline environments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 38 275–300.

    Not in our library10.1016/0167-8809(92)90151-z

  64. 64.

    Grattan S. R. Grieve C. M. (1999 ). “Mineral nutrient acquisition and response by plants grown in saline environments,” in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, 2, ed. Pessarakli M. (Basel, NY: CRC Press), 203–229.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Guo L. Q. Shi D. C. Wang D. L. (2010 ). The key physiological response to alkali stress by the alkali-resistant halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora is the accumulation of large quantities of organic acids and into the rhyzosphere. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 196 123–135.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00397.x

  66. 66.
  67. 67.

    Hajiboland R. Aliasgharzadeh N. Laiegh S. F. Poschenrieder C. (2010 ). Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Plant Soil 331 313–327.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11104-009-0255-z

  68. 68.

    Hamaji K. Nagira M. Yoshida K. Ohnishi M. Oda Y. Uemura T. (2009 ). Dynamic aspects of ion accumulation by vesicle traffic under salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 50 2023–2033.

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcp143

  69. 69.

    Hammer E. C. Rillig M. C. (2011 ). The influence of different stresses on glomalin levels in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-salinity increases glomalin content. PLoS One 6:e28426.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0028426

  70. 70.

    Harris-Valle C. Esqueda M. Gutiérrez A. Castellanos A. E. Gardea A. A. Berbara R. (2018 ). Physiological response of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo mycorrhized by Sonoran desert native arbuscular fungi to drought and salinity stresses. Braz. J. Microbiol. 49 45–53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.005

  71. 71.

    Hasegawa P. M. Bressan R. A. Zhu J. K. Bohnert H. J. (2000 ). Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 51 463–499.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463

  72. 72.

    Hashem A. Abd-Allah E. F. Alqarawi A. A. Aldubise A. Egamberdieva D. (2015 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhances salinity tolerance of Panicum turgidum Forssk by altering photosynthetic and antioxidant pathways. J. Plant Interact. 10 230–242.

    Not in our library10.1080/17429145.2015.1052025

  73. 73.

    Hashem A. Alqarawi A. A. Radhakrishnan R. Al-Arjani A. B. F. Aldehaish H. A. Egamberdieva D. (2018 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 25 1102–1114.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.03.009

  74. 74.

    Hidri R. Barea J. M. Mahmoud O. M. B. Abdelly C. Azcón R. (2016 ). Impact of microbial inoculation on biomass accumulation by Sulla carnosa provenances, and in regulating nutrition, physiological and antioxidant activities of this species under non-saline and saline conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 201 28–41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2016.06.013

  75. 75.

    Hodge A. Fitter A. H. (2010 ). Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 13754–13759.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1005874107

  76. 76.

    Hoff T. Stummann B. M. Henningsen K. W. (1992 ). Structure, function and regulation of nitrate reductase in higher plants. Physiol. Plant 84 616–624.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb04712.x

  77. 77.

    Hu W. Zhang H. Chen H. Tang M. (2017 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence Lycium barbarum tolerance of water stress in a hot environment. Mycorrhiza 27 451–463.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-017-0765-0

  78. 78.

    Ibrahim A. H. Abdel-Fattah G. M. Eman F. M. Abd El-Aziz M. H. Shohr A. E. (2011 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and spermine alleviate the adverse effects of salinity stress on electrolyte leakage and productivity of wheat plants. Phyton 51 261–268.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Jahromi F. Aroca R. Porcel R. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2008 ). Influence of salinity on the in vitro development of Glomus intraradices and on the in vivo physiological and molecular responses of mycorrhizal lettuce plants. Microb. Ecol. 55 45–53.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00248-007-9249-7

  80. 80.

    Jansen M. A. Gaba V. Greenberg B. M. Mattoo A. K. Edelman M. (1996 ). Low threshold levels of ultraviolet-B in a background of photosynthetically active radiation trigger rapid degradation of the D2 protein of photosystem-II. Plant J. 9 693–699.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.9050693.x

  81. 81.
  82. 82.

    Kaldorf M. Schmelzer E. Bothe H. (1998 ). Expression of maize and fungal nitrate reductase genes in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11 439–448.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi.1998.11.6.439

  83. 83.

    Kaplan B. Sherman T. Fromm H. (2007 ). Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in plants. FEBS Lett. 581 2237–2246.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.017

  84. 84.

    Kapoor R. Sharma D. Bhatnagar A. K. (2008 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizae in micropropagation systems and their potential applications. Sci. Hortic. 116 227–239.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scienta.2008.02.002

  85. 85.

    Kaur G. Asthir B. (2015 ). Proline: a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Biol. Plant. 59 609–619. 29525441

    Not in our library10.1007/s10535-015-0549-3

  86. 86.

    Khalloufi M. Martínez-Andújar C. Lachaâl M. Karray-Bouraoui N. Pérez-Alfocea F. Albacete A. (2017 ). The interaction between foliar GA3 application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improves growth in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modifying the hormonal balance. J. Plant Physiol. 214 134–144.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2017.04.012

  87. 87.

    Kishor P. K. Hong Z. Miao G. H. Hu C. A. A. Verma D. P. S. (1995 ). Overexpression of [delta]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 108 1387–1394.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.4.1387

  88. 88.

    Köhler B. Raschke K. (2000 ). The delivery of salts to the xylem. Three types of anion conductance in the plasmalemma of the xylem parenchyma of roots of barley. Plant Physiol. 122 243–254.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.122.1.243

  89. 89.

    Koltai H. (2011 ). Strigolactones are regulators of root development. New Phytol. 190 545–549.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03678.x

  90. 90.

    Kong C. C. Ren C. G. Li R. Z. Xie Z. H. Wang J. P. (2017 ). Hydrogen peroxide and strigolactones signaling are involved in alleviation of salt stress induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in Sesbania cannabina seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 36 734–742.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-017-9675-9

  91. 91.

    Kumar A. Sharma S. Mishra S. (2010 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and salinity on seedling growth, solute accumulation, and mycorrhizal dependency of Jatropha curcas L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 29 297–306.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-009-9136-1

  92. 92.

    Kusano T. Berberich T. Tateda C. Takahashi Y. (2008 ). Polyamines: essential factors for growth and survival. Planta 228 367–381.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-008-0772-7

  93. 93.

    Kuznetsov V. Shevyakova N. I. (2010 ). “Polyamines and plant adaptation to saline environments,” in Desert Plants: Biology and Biotechnology, ed. Remawat K. G. (Berlin: Springer), 261–298.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-02550-1_13

  94. 94.

    Kwak J. M. Mori I. C. Pei Z. M. Leonhardt N. Torres M. A. Dangl J. L. (2003 ). NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 22 2623–2633.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/cdg277

  95. 95.

    Latef A. A. H. A. Chaoxing H. (2011 ). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, mineral nutrition, antioxidant enzymes activity and fruit yield of tomato grown under salinity stress. Sci. Hortic. 127 228–233.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.020

  96. 96.

    Läuchli A. Lüttge U. (2002 ). Salinity: Environment-Plants-Molecules. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    Levitt J. (1980 ). Responses of Plants to Environmental Stress: Chilling, Freezing, and High Temperature Stresses. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    Li T. Run-Jin L. Xin-Hua H. Bao-Shan W. (2012 ). Enhancement of superoxide dismutase and catalase activities and salt tolerance of euhalophyte Suaeda salsa L. by mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Pedosphere 22 217–224.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1002-0160(12)60008-3

  99. 99.

    Li X. Christie P. (2001 ). Changes in soil solution Zn and pH and uptake of Zn by arbuscular mycorrhizal red clover in Zn-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 42 201–207.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00126-0

  100. 100.

    Lima Neto M. C. Martins M. D. O. Ferreira-Silva S. L. Silveira J. A. G. (2015 ). Jatropha curcas and Ricinus communis display contrasting photosynthetic mechanisms in response to environmental conditions. Sci. Agric. 72 260–269.

    Not in our library10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0325

  101. 101.

    Lin J. Wang Y. Sun S. Mu C. Yan X. (2017 ). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments of Leymus chinensis seedlings under salt-alkali stress and nitrogen deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 576 234–241.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.091

  102. 102.

    Liu A. Hamel C. Hamilton R. I. Ma B. L. Smith D. L. (2000 ). Acquisition of Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe by mycorrhizal maize (Zea mays L.) grown in soil at different P and micronutrient levels. Mycorrhiza 9 331–336.

    Not in our library10.1007/s005720050277

  103. 103.

    Liu K. H. Huang C. Y. Tsay Y. F. (1999 ). CHL1 is a dual-affinity nitrate transporter of Arabidopsis involved in multiple phases of nitrate uptake. Plant Cell 11 865–874.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.11.5.865

  104. 104.

    Liu S. Guo X. Feng G. Maimaitiaili B. Fan J. He X. (2016 ). Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can alleviate salt stress and promote growth of cotton and maize in saline fields. Plant Soil 398 195–206.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11104-015-2656-5

  105. 105.

    Lunn J. E. Delorge I. Figueroa C. M. Van Dijck P. Stitt M. (2014 ). Trehalose metabolism in plants. Plant J. 79 544–567.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.12509

  106. 106.

    Maathuis F. J. (2013 ). Sodium in plants: perception, signalling, and regulation of sodium fluxes. J. Exp. Bot. 65 849–858.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ert326

  107. 107.

    Maathuis F. J. Amtmann A. (1999 ). K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann. Bot. 84 123–133.

    Not in our library10.1006/anbo.1999.0912

  108. 108.

    Marschner H. Dell B. (1994 ). Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 159 89–102.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00000098

  109. 109.
  110. 110.

    Miransari M. (2010 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake. Arch. Microbiol. 193 77–81.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00203-010-0657-6

  111. 111.

    Miransari M. (2012 ). “Role of phytohormone signaling during stress,” in Environmental Adaptations and Stress Tolerance of Plants in the Era of Climate Change, eds Ahmad P. Prasad M. (New York, NY: Springer), 381–393.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4614-0815-4_17

  112. 112.

    Mittler R. (2002 ). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7 405–410.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9

  113. 113.

    Munns R. (1993 ). Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell Environ. 16 15–24.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00840.x

  114. 114.

    Munns R. (2005 ). Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol. 167 645–663.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01487.x

  115. 115.

    Munns R. James R. A. Läuchli A. (2006 ). Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 57 1025–1043.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erj100

  116. 116.

    Munns R. Tester M. (2008 ). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59 651–681.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

  117. 117.
  118. 118.

    Navarro J. M. Pérez-Tornero O. Morte A. (2014 ). Alleviation of salt stress in citrus seedlings inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on the rootstock salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 171 76–85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2013.06.006

  119. 119.

    Noctor G. Foyer C. H. (1998 ). Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 49 249–279.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249

  120. 120.

    Olías R. Eljakaoui Z. Li J. U. N. De Morales P. A. Marín-Manzano M. C. Pardo J. M. (2009 ). The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 is essential for salt tolerance in tomato and affects the partitioning of Na+ between plant organs. Plant Cell Environ. 32 904–916.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01971.x

  121. 121.

    Ouziad F. Wilde P. Schmelzer E. Hildebrandt U. Bothe H. (2006 ). Analysis of expression of aquaporins and Na+/H+ transporters in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and affected by salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 57 177–186.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.05.011

  122. 122.

    Pandey R. Garg N. (2017 ). High effectiveness of Rhizophagus irregularis is linked to superior modulation of antioxidant defence mechanisms in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. genotypes grown under salinity stress. Mycorrhiza 27 669–682.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-017-0778-8

  123. 123.

    Pang X. M. Zhang Z. Y. Wen X. P. Ban Y. Moriguchi T. (2007 ). Polyamines, all-purpose players in response to environment stresses in plants. Plant Stress 1 173–188.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    Pardo J. M. Cubero B. Leidi E. O. Quintero F. J. (2006 ). Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 57 1181–1199.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erj114

  125. 125.

    Parihar P. Singh S. Singh R. Singh V. P. Prasad S. M. (2015 ). Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 22 4056–4075.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1

  126. 126.

    Parvaiz A. Satyawati S. (2008 ). Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants-a review. Plant Soil Environ. 54 89–99.

    Not in our library10.17221/2774-pse

  127. 127.

    Pedranzani H. Rodríguez-Rivera M. Gutiérrez M. Porcel R. Hause B. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2016 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates physiology and performance of Digitaria eriantha plants subjected to abiotic stresses by modulating antioxidant and jasmonate levels. Mycorrhiza 26 141–152.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-015-0653-4

  128. 128.

    Peng J. Liu J. Zhang L. Luo J. Dong H. Ma Y. (2016 ). Effects of soil salinity on sucrose metabolism in cotton leaves. PLoS One 11:e0156241.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0156241

  129. 129.

    Pitman M. G. Läuchli A. (2002 ). “Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems,” in Salinity: Environment- Plants- Molecules, eds Läuchli A. Lüttge U. (Dordrecht: Springer), 3–20.

    Not in our library10.1007/0-306-48155-3_1

  130. 130.

    Porcel R. Aroca R. Azcon R. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2016 ). Regulation of cation transporter genes by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice plants subjected to salinity suggests improved salt tolerance due to reduced Na+ root-to-shoot distribution. Mycorrhiza 26 673–684.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-016-0704-5

  131. 131.

    Porcel R. Aroca R. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2012 ). Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32 181–200.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x

  132. 132.

    Porcel R. Redondo-Gómez S. Mateos-Naranjo E. Aroca R. Garcia R. Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2015 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis ameliorates the optimum quantum yield of photosystem II and reduces non-photochemical quenching in rice plants subjected to salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 185 75–83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.006

  133. 133.

    Rabie G. H. (2005 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and kinetin on the response of mungbean plants to irrigation with seawater. Mycorrhiza 15 225–230.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-004-0345-y

  134. 134.

    Rabie G. H. Almadini A. M. (2005 ). Role of bioinoculants in development of salt-tolerance of Vicia faba plants under salinity stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4 210–222.

    Not in our library10.5897/ajb2005.000-3041

  135. 135.

    Rahnama A. Munns R. Poustini K. Watt M. (2011 ). A screening method to identify genetic variation in root growth response to a salinity gradient. J. Exp. Bot. 62 69–77.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erq359

  136. 136.

    Ramel F. Birtic S. Ginies C. Soubigou-Taconnat L. Triantaphylidès C. Havaux M. (2012 ). Carotenoid oxidation products are stress signals that mediate gene responses to singlet oxygen in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 5535–5540.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1115982109

  137. 137.

    Redillas M. C. Park S. H. Lee J. W. Kim Y. S. Jeong J. S. Jung H. (2012 ). Accumulation of trehalose increases soluble sugar contents in rice plants conferring tolerance to drought and salt stress. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 6 89–96.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11816-011-0210-3

  138. 138.

    Redondo-Gómez S. Mateos-Naranjo E. Figueroa M. E. Davy A. J. (2010 ). Salt stimulation of growth and photosynthesis in an extreme halophyte, Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. Plant Biol. 12 79–87.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00207.x

  139. 139.

    Ren C. G. Kong C. C. Xie Z. H. (2018 ). Role of abscisic acid in strigolactone-induced salt stress tolerance in arbuscular mycorrhizal Sesbania cannabina seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 18:74.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12870-018-1292-7

  140. 140.

    Rinaldelli E. Mancuso S. (1996 ). Response of young mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) to saline conditions.I. short-term electrophysiological and long-term vegetative salt effects. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 10 126–134.

    Not in our library

  141. 141.

    Ruiz-Lozano J. M. Azcón R. (1996 ). Mycorrhizal colonization and drought stress as factors affecting nitrate reductase activity in lettuce plants. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 60 175–181.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01074-2

  142. 142.

    Ruiz-Lozano J. M. Porcel R. Azcón C. Aroca R. (2012 ). Regulation by arbuscular mycorrhizae of the integrated physiological response to salinity in plants: new challenges in physiological and molecular studies. J. Exp. Bot. 63 695–709.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ers126

  143. 143.

    Saeed W. Naseem S. Ali Z. (2017 ). Strigolactones biosynthesis and their role in abiotic stress resilience in plants: a critical review. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1487.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2017.01487

  144. 144.

    Saia S. Rappa V. Ruisi P. Abenavoli M. R. Sunseri F. Giambalvo D. (2015 ). Soil inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms promotes plant growth and nutrient transporter genes expression in durum wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 6:815.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2015.00815

  145. 145.

    Sannazzaro A. I. Echeverría M. Albertó E. O. Ruiz O. A. Menéndez A. B. (2007 ). Modulation of polyamine balance in Lotus glaber by salinity and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45 39–46.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.12.008

  146. 146.

    Schnepf A. Leitner D. Klepsch S. Pellerin S. Mollier A. (2011 ). “Modelling phosphorus dynamics in the soil-plant system,” in Phosphorus in Action, eds Bünemann E. Oberson A. Frossard E. (Berlin: Springer), 113–133.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9_5

  147. 147.

    Schrader S. Sauter J. J. (2002 ). Seasonal changes of sucrose-phosphate synthase and sucrose synthase activities in poplar wood (Populus x canadensis Moench < robusta > ) and their possible role in carbohydrate metabolism. J. Plant Physiol. 159 833–843.

    Not in our library10.1078/0176-1617-00730

  148. 148.

    Seemann J. R. Critchley C. (1985 ). Effects of salt stress on the growth, ion content, stomatal behaviour and photosynthetic capacity of a salt-sensitive species. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 164 151–162.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00396077

  149. 149.

    Selvaraj T. Chellappan P. (2006 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizae: a diverse personality. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 7 349–358.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    Serbinova E. A. Packer L. (1994 ). Antioxidant properties of α-tocopherol and α-tocotrienol. Methods Enzymol. 234 354–366.

    Not in our library10.1016/0076-6879(94)34105-2

  151. 151.

    Shaul O. (2002 ). Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg. Biometals 15 307–321.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1016091118585

  152. 152.

    Shaul-Keinan O. Gadkar V. Ginzberg I. Grünzweig J. M. Chet I. Elad Y. (2002 ). Hormone concentrations in tobacco roots change during arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices. New Phytol. 154 501–507.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00388.x

  153. 153.

    Shekoofeh E. Sepideh H. Roya R. (2012 ). Role of mycorrhizal fungi and salicylic acid in salinity tolerance of Ocimum basilicum resistance to salinity. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11 2223–2235.

    Not in our library10.5897/ajb11.1672

  154. 154.

    Sheng M. Tang M. Chen H. Yang B. Zhang F. Huang Y. (2008 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 18 287–296.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-008-0180-7

  155. 155.

    Sheng M. Tang M. Zhang F. Huang Y. (2011 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on organic solutes in maize leaves under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 21 423–430.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-010-0353-z

  156. 156.

    Singh M. Kumar J. Singh S. Singh V. P. Prasad S. M. (2015 ). Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 14 407–426.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8

  157. 157.

    Smirnoff N. (1993 ). The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol. 125 27–58.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03863.x

  158. 158.

    Smith S. E. Facelli E. Pope S. Smith F. A. (2010 ). Plant performance in stressful environments: interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Soil 326 3–20.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11104-009-9981-5

  159. 159.

    Smith S. E. Read D. J. (2008 ). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Not in our library

  160. 160.

    Subramanian K. S. Tenshia V. Jayalakshmi K. Ramach V. (2009 ). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices) (fungus aided) in zinc nutrition of maize. J. Agric. Biotech. Sustain. Dev. 1 29–38.

    Not in our library10.5897/jabsd/5de37e539765

  161. 161.

    Sultana N. Ikeda T. Itoh R. (1999 ). Effect of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation in developing rice grains. Environ. Exp. Bot. 42 211–220.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0098-8472(99)00035-0

  162. 162.

    Taiz L. Zeiger E. (eds). (2006 ). Plant Physiology. Sunderland, MA: Sinaur Associates.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    Talaat N. B. Shawky B. T. (2011 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on yield, nutrients, organic solutes, and antioxidant enzymes of two wheat cultivars under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 174 283–291.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0196408

  164. 164.

    Talaat N. B. Shawky B. T. (2013 ). Modulation of nutrient acquisition and polyamine pool in salt-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35 2601–2610.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11738-013-1295-9

  165. 165.

    Talaat N. B. Shawky B. T. (2014 ). Protective effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants exposed to salinity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 98 20–31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.005

  166. 166.

    Thomas C. E. McLean L. R. Parker R. A. Ohlweiler D. F. (1992 ). Ascorbate and phenolic antioxidant interactions in prevention of liposomal oxidation. Lipids 27 543–550.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02536138

  167. 167.

    United Nations [UN] (2018 ). World Population Report. NewYork, NY: United Nations

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    Van den Ende W. Michiels A. Le Roy K. Van Laere A. (2002 ). Cloning of a vacuolar invertase from Belgian endive leaves (Cichorium intybus). Physiol. Plant. 115 504–512.

    Not in our library10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150404.x

  169. 169.
  170. 170.

    Viljanen K. Sundberg S. Ohshima T. Heinonen M. (2002 ). Carotenoids as antioxidants to prevent photooxidation.Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 104 353–359.

    Not in our library10.1002/1438-9312(200206)104:6<353::aid-ejlt353>3.0.co;2-5

  171. 171.

    Wang R. Liu D. Crawford N. M. (1998 ). The Arabidopsis CHL1 protein plays a major role in high-affinity nitrate uptake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 15134–15139.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.25.15134

  172. 172.

    Wang Y. Wang M. Li Y. Wu A. Huang J. (2018 ). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nitrogen uptake of Chrysanthemum morifolium under salt stress. PLoS One 13:e0196408.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0196408

  173. 173.
  174. 174.

    Wu N. Li Z. Liu H. Tang M. (2015 ). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on photosynthesis and water status of Populus cathayana Rehder males and females under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37 183–197.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11738-015-1932-6

  175. 175.

    Wu Q. S. Zou Y. N. Liu W. Ye X. F. Zai H. F. Zhao L. J. (2010 ). Alleviation of salt stress in citrus seedlings inoculated with mycorrhiza: changes in leaf antioxidant defense systems. Plant Soil Environ. 56 470–475.

    Not in our library10.17221/54/2010-pse

  176. 176.

    Xu H. Lu Y. Tong S. (2018 ). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize seedlings under salt stress. Emir. J. Food Agric. 30 199–204.

    Not in our library10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i3.1642

  177. 177.

    Yamada Y. Furusawa S. Nagasaka S. Shimomura K. Yamaguchi S. Umehara M. (2014 ). Strigolactone signaling regulates rice leaf senescence in response to a phosphate deficiency. Planta 240 399–408.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-014-2096-0

  178. 178.

    Yang S. Cui L. (2009 ). The action of aquaporins in cell elongation, salt stress and photosynthesis. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 25 321–327.

    Not in our library

  179. 179.

    Yang X. Liang Z. Wen X. Lu C. (2008 ). Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine leads to increased tolerance of photosynthesis to salt stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 66 73–86.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-007-9253-9

  180. 180.

    Yang Y. Guo Y. (2017 ). Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 217 523–539.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.14920

  181. 181.

    Yang Y. Tang M. Sulpice R. Chen H. Tian S. Ban Y. (2014 ). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter fractal dimension characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings through regulating plant growth, leaf water status, photosynthesis, and nutrient concentration under drought stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 33 612–625.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-013-9410-0

  182. 182.

    Yu J. Sun L. Fan N. Yang Z. Huang B. (2015 ). Physiological factors involved in positive effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on Bermudagrass tolerance to salinity stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 115 20–27.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.02.003

  183. 183.

    Zapata P. J. Serrano M. Garcíalegaz M. F. Pretel M. T. Botella M. A. (2017 ). Short term effect of salt shock on ethylene and polyamines depends on their plant sensitivity. Front. Plant Sci. 8:855.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2017.00855

  184. 184.

    Zhang H. S. Qin F. F. Qin P. Pan S. M. (2014 ). Evidence that arbuscular mycorrhizal and phosphate-solubilizing fungi alleviate NaCl stress in the halophyte Kosteletzkya virginica: nutrient uptake and ion distribution within root tissues. Mycorrhiza 24 383–395.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00572-013-0546-3

  185. 185.

    Zhang W. Wang C. Lu T. Zheng Y. (2018 ). Cooperation between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and earthworms promotes the physiological adaptation of maize under a high salt stress. Plant Soil 423 125–140.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11104-017-3481-9

  186. 186.

    Zhu X. Song F. Liu S. Liu F. (2016 ). Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in alleviating salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under ambient and elevated CO2. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 202 486–496.

    Not in our library10.1111/jac.12175

  187. 187.

    Zhu X. Song F. Liu S. Liu F. Li X. (2018 ). Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances nutrient accumulation in wheat exposed to elevated CO2 and soil salinity. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 81 836–846.

    Not in our library10.1002/jpln.201700575

  188. 188.

    Zou Y. N. Wu Q. S. Huang Y. M. Ni Q. D. He X. H. (2013 ). Mycorrhizal-mediated lower proline accumulation in Poncirus trifoliata under water deficit derives from the integration of inhibition of proline synthesis with increase of proline degradation. PLoS One 8:e80568.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0080568

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.