Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Plant derived substances with anti-cancer activity: from folklore to practice

Marcelo Fridlender, Yoram Kapulnik, Hinanit Koltai

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2015 · Review

doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00799

Abstract

Plants have had an essential role in the folklore of ancient cultures. In addition to the use as food and spices, plants have also been utilized as medicines for over 5000 years. It is estimated that 70-95% of the population in developing countries continues to use traditional medicines even today. A new trend, that involved the isolation of plant active compounds begun during the early nineteenth century. This trend led to the discovery of different active compounds that are derived from plants. In the last decades, more and more new materials derived from plants have been authorized and subscribed as medicines, including those with anti-cancer activity. Cancer is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The number of new cases is expected to rise by about 70% over the next two decades. Thus, there is a real need for new efficient anti-cancer drugs with reduced side effects, and plants are a promising source for such entities. Here we focus on some plant-derived substances exhibiting anti-cancer and chemoprevention activity, their mode of action and bioavailability. These include paclitaxel, curcumin, and cannabinoids. In addition, development and use of their synthetic analogs, and those of strigolactones, are discussed. Also discussed are commercial considerations and future prospects for development of plant derived substances with anti-cancer activity.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Plants have had an essential role in the folklore of ancient cultures. In addition to the use as food and spices, plants have also been utilized as medicines for over 5000 years. Two remaining living traditions, the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Ayurveda, the traditional Indian medicine (TIM) have provided most of the current knowledge related to medicinal plants. In TCM and TIM folklore, herbal medicines were prepared as teas, tinctures, poultices, powders, and other types of formulations. The expertise to select the right plants, methods of drug concoction and their specific use has been first transferred orally from one generation to the next until set down.

It is estimated that 70–95% of the population in developing countries continues to use traditional medicines. Today medicinal herbs are defined as plants that contain valuable substances with therapeutic or beneficial effect in healing and prevention of various ailments in man and animals. Herbal products such as plant extracts, dry powders and parts of plants, fungi, and algae have been used as complementary treatments alongside conventional drugs.

A new trend, that involved the isolation of plant active compounds begun during the early nineteenth century. This tendency led to the discovery of the analgesic (painkilling) drugs morphine and codeine from opium (Papaver somniferum L.); cocaine from Erythroxylum coca; the cardiac glycoside, digitoxin that was isolated from Digitalis purpurea and Digitalis lanata that has been used for cardiac conditions and as an anti-cancer drug, and quinine from Cinchona calisaya Wedd. and Cinchona succirubra Pav. ex Klotzsch that has antipyretic (fever reducing), antimalarial, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Some of these molecules are still in use. Such natural compounds provide a huge variety, often with strong biological activity and therefore play a significant role in the development of therapeutics treatments.

Discovery of plant-derived substances has evolved during the last 200 years due to the variety of experience and expertise needed in order to identify such compound. Initially, a plant is identified by a botanist or ethnobotanist, ethnopharmacologist, or plant ecologist. Next, plant extracts followed by biological screening assays are performed by a phytochemist to identify the potential therapeutic activity followed by isolation of the active compound. Finally, molecular biology studies are required to reveal the mode of action and relevant molecular targets. The combination of these fields determines an interdisciplinary approach termed pharmacognosy.

Today, it is estimated that about 25–28% of all modern medicines are directly or indirectly derived from higher plants demonstrating the enormous medicinal potential of plants that has been known for thousands of years in traditional medicine. In the last decades, more and more new materials derived from plants have been authorized and subscribed as medicines. Several important examples for plant origin medicines are Arteether (Artemotil®), a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Artemisia annua and serves for treatment of malaria, Galantamine (Reminyl®) an amaryllidaceae alkaloid from Galanthus woronowii used for Alzheimer treatment due to its activity as a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, Apomorphine hydrochloride (Apokyn®) a dopamine receptor agonist produced in Papaver somniferum L. used to treat Parkinson’s disease, Tiotropium bromide (Spiriva®) isolated from Atropa belladonna and used for to treat COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;; ), Nitisinone (Orfadin®) a modified mesotrione from Callistemon citrinus that inhibits the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) enzyme and prevents accumulation of fumaryl and maleyl acetoacetate in the liver and kidneys.

Interestingly, many isolated substances against cancer are connected with interactions between plants and microbes. Such interactions are related to rhizospheric or endophytic bacteria, yeasts, and fungi. These microorganisms penetrate and reside within plants without injuring them or causing any disease. Furthermore, such microbes serve as a barrier for colonization by pathogenic microorganisms and participate in plant growth and plant defense response by production of a large variety of secondary metabolites (reviewed in;;;; ). Since almost all plants co-exist with at least one endophyte and many molecules have been isolated from such systems, this review does not aim to summarize this field and it should review somewhere else. Nonetheless, two recent studies revealed that extracts from Chaetomium globosum and 5-Methyl phenazine-1-carboxylic acid that is produced by Pseudomonas putida had cytotoxic effects against cancer cell lines. The similarity of secondary metabolites produce by endophytes and their hosts implies on gene transfer between them throughout co-evolution. Taking advantage of biotechnology new drugs from endophytes can be manufactured in faster and controlled processes.

In addition to the drugs mentioned above, other plant-derived substances with anti-cancer activity such as Paclitaxel (Taxol®) and Camptothecin have been isolated and approved for use. Here we will focus on some plant-derived substances exhibiting anti-cancer activity, their mode of action and bioavailability. In addition, comparison of the use of natural vs. synthetic analogs as well as commercial consideration will be discussed.

Examples for Plant-Derived Substances with Anti-Cancer Activity

Cancer is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In 2012, 8.2 million cancer related deaths and approximately 14 million new cases were counted. The number of new cases is expected to rise by about 70% over the next two decades. Among men, the five most common sites of cancer diagnosed in 2012 were lung, prostate, colorectum, stomach, and liver cancer. Among women the five most common sites diagnosed were breast, colorectum, lung, cervix, and stomach cancer. It is expected that annual cancer cases will rise from 14 million in 2012 to 22 within the next two decades (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ and references within).

Today, solid tumors are surgically removed and patients receive adjuvant radiation treatment and chemotherapy that cause severe sides effects and dramatically reduce quality of life. In addition, the toxicity of some treatments restricts their use and effectiveness. Certain types of cancer such as breast cancer, can be treated using biological drugs (Herceptin), however the cost of these drugs is very high and their effectiveness is limited in most cases to certain kinds of tumors. In many cases, the tumor develops resistance to a particular drug and the patient is transferred to a different drug. In addition, many patients are treated with a combination of several drugs. More on cancer treatment and survivorship statistics may be found in and references within. Thus, there is no doubt that there is a real need for new efficient anti-cancer drugs with reduced side effects, and plants are a promising source for such entities. Due to the importance of fighting cancer and the variety of potential molecules offered by plants, over 60% of anti-cancer drugs are directly or indirectly derived from this kingdom.

Probably the most well-known plant-derived anti-cancer drug is Paclitaxel (Taxol®). The cytotoxic activity of this taxane dipertene found in extracts from the bark of Taxus brevifolia Nutt. (Western yew) was first reported by. Later on, other Taxus species were found to produce this molecule. Interestingly, In 1993, Taxol was also found to be produced at low levels by Taxus’ endophytic fungus Taxomyces andreanae and later on by other endophytic fungi allowing its possible production by future microorganism fermentation. Taxol’s molecular structure is based on the A, B, and C rings that harbor two hydroxyl groups, two acetyl groups, one benzoyl group and an oxetane ring. The side chain A ring together with the benzoyl group at C2 and the oxetane ring are responsible for Taxol’s anti-cancer activity. The C3 amide-acyl group in the C12 chain maintains this activity and the hydroxyl group at C2 enhances it.

As other plant-derived compound such as vinca alkaloids, Taxol disrupts microtubule function. However, in contrast to vinca alkaloids that disrupt microtubule assembly by binding depolymerized microtubules, Taxol (essentially all taxanes) inhibits microtubule disassembly by binding the polymerized microtubules. Microtubules are composed of αβ-tubulin heterodimers and are highly dynamic polymers. Taxol stabilizes this dynamicity by binding to and altering the conformation of the microtubules. Taxol was also found to reduce the binding of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). Despite the fact that MAP binding induces conformational rearrangements of α- and β-tubulin that promote an overall stabilization of microtubules, Taxol binding to the MAP-microtubule complex leads to further stabilization of this complex. These disturbances in microtubule lead to prevention of normal mitotic spindle formation and function resulting in prevention of mitosis and thus cell proliferation.

A common problem observed in Taxol-treated patients is development of drug-resistance over time. However, a combined treatment of Taxol together with down-regulation of expression of Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2), a cell death regulator, or other apoptotic related genes inhibits invasion, angiogenesis tumor growth, and maintains Taxol sensitivity in different types of cancer cells.

Although discovered in the early 1970s of the twentieth century, it took over 25 years to bring Taxol to the market. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only in 1992 for the treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer. Clinical trials also demonstrated encouraging results for other cancer types such a head, neck, lung, and breast cancer. This anti-cancer drug, that is now produced in a semi-synthetically (see below) process reached the list of the top-selling 20 drugs and sold above $1 billion yearly in 1999 with a peak of $1.6 billion in 2000 before generic drugs appeared in the market. In 2002, sales for Taxol and Camptothecin, a DNA Topoisomerase I inhibitor, were more than $2.75 billion, approximately a third of the anti-cancer drug market. Docetaxel (Taxotere), Taxol’s analog, had sales of $3 billion in 2009. Taxol’s success serves as an example and encouraging story for discovery and bringing to market additional plant-derived substances.

Chemoprevention represents a different attitude in the battle against cancer. This approach was defined by as ingestion of dietary or pharmaceutical compounds in order to prevent or delay carcinogenic processes. Many potential chemopreventive secondary metabolites in both plant extracts as well as purified molecules isolated from teas, herbs, spices, fruits and vegetables have been explored.

Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is the most prominent chemopreventive agent studied. This yellow–orange turmeric powder, is a polyphenol that accumulates in the rhizome of Curcuma longa. Both TCM and TIM have used curcumin as a medicine for treatments of diseases. Due to its capabilities to regulated important transcription factors, cytokines, protein kinases, adhesion molecules and redox status, curcumin can serve as an anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic, and antineoplastic agent. Thus it has been used to treat many different conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, allergy, asthma and bronchitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, renal ischemia, psoriasis, scleroderma, acquired immunodeficiency disease (AIDS), and cancer as well as an anti-aging and scar formation agent.

Hundreds of studies on curcumin anti-cancer activities were published and are discussed here only briefly. Both in vitro and in vivo assays have shown inhibition of cell growth in many types of cancerous cells. Maybe one of the most important features related to curcumin is the suppression of the transcription factor NF-κ-B, a central protein in many types of cancer. This inhibition causes reduction in expression of NF-κ-B target genes such as COX-2 and cyclin D1 resulting in apoptosis. Induction of apoptosis by curcumin was also shown recently when this substance was given together with the estrogen receptor antagonist Tamoxifen for treatment of melanoma. Interestingly, also autophagy was induced using such combination.

Curcumin can act also as chemopreventive agent of photocarcinogenesis by protecting the skin through diminishing oxidative stress and suppressing inflammation. As Taxol, curcumin has also been shown to affect microtubule assembly leading cells to mitotic arrest. Recently, this type of action by curcumin was found non-specific only to cancer cells implying its possible impact also on normal cells. Therefore, additional studies to assure this plant-derived substance influence on normal cells and its used in combination with other anti-cancer drugs are required.

Cannabis sativa has also been used in the TCM, mainly to treat malaria, constipation, rheumatic pains and during childbirth. It was only in the nineteenth century that an Irish scientist and physician, O’Shaughnessy had found that in India it is used as an analgesic, anticonvulsant, antispasmodic, anti-emetic, and hypnotic agent. These observations caused its spreading into Europe and US, until it was outlawed in 1928 and 1937, respectively due to its negative effects (reviewed in ).

The plant Cannabis sativa is known to contain more than 60 terpenophenolic compounds, named phytocannabinoids. The first active compound isolated from Cannabis sativa was Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the active component of marijuana. Cannabinoids are mainly used in the last two centuries as supporting drugs for patients that receive either radiation or chemotherapies. These drugs ease common symptom and side effects related to such treatments as nausea, vomiting, cachexia, and loss of appetite.

Both natural and synthetic cannabinoids act by interacting with two specific G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, known as cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1 receptor) and cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2 receptor). The role of CB1 receptors in regulation of neurotransmitter release and its involvement in cannabinoid psychoactive effects is well known. In accordance, these receptors are positioned in central and peripheral nerves. On the hand, the function of CB2 receptors which are most abundant in the immune system remained vague for many years although there were evidences for their participation in regulation of cytokine’s function and release. Today there is enough data indicating CB2 role’s in a variety of immunological functional responses mainly through progression of inflammation events. Participation of CB2 in different signal transduction pathways implies its essential function in maintenance of a homeostatic immune balance. In addition, in several different studies, expression of CB2 at different levels has been also detected in the central nervous system and brain. Moreover, some studies indicate this receptor can be used as a selective molecular target for therapeutic treatments of both inflammation-related conditions and neuropathic diseases that display hyper-inflammation processes.

The discovery of Δ9-THC receptors, led to the assumption that endogenous ligands similar to this molecule should exits. Indeed, two of these ligands, anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG), were exposed shortly after. This was followed by identification of other endogenous ligands as well as synthetic pathways responsible for both synthesis and degradation of these cannabinoids.

The use of cannabinoids as anti-cancer agents is still under debate due to both cancer promoting and inhibiting effects shown in the last centuries. The fact that cannabinoids play a role in cell fate decision, proliferation, and apoptosis might imply different effects under different conditions demonstrated that the endocannabinoid system may play a role in cancer differentiation (by decreasing the levels of endogenous agonists in differentiated cells vs. undifferentiated ones), cell growth and cell migration leading to metastases. On the other hand, their results imply that in the gastrointestinal system cannabinoid receptors are involved in inhibition of cell proliferation of colorectal carcinoma. In studies using cell lines, the antineoplastic effect of both natural and synthetic cannabinoids, cannabinoids agonist, and endocannabinoids have been shown for several cancer types including carcinomas (skin, lung, prostate, and uterine), neuroblastoma, gliomas, lymphomas, thyroid epithelioma, and breast cancer. Although the mode of action leading to these effect is not completely clear, cannabinoids receptors appear to mediate it (reviewed in;;; ). In contrast to these in vitro studies, long-term exposure to cannabis carcinogens during smoking may lead to cancer in the aero-digestive tract and lungs, suggesting that cannabinoids should be administrated with caution.

Development and Use of Synthetic Analogs to Plant Derived Substances

One limiting trait related to many plant secondary metabolites is their poor solubility or poor bioavailability that delays manufacturing of large amounts required to serve as medicines. The main solution adopted for different plant derived substances is the use of semi-synthetic or synthetic analogs. One known example is morphine that has been modified (to morphine-6-glucuronide) in order to obtain better therapeutics features such as side effect.

In the case of Taxol, in addition to the low amounts produced in all Taxus species this compound is insoluble in water. Several different approaches were explored in attempts to obtained higher amounts of Taxol. At the end of the twentieth century, two groups reported that needles of the European Taxus, Taxus baccata L., contain a high concentration of two Taxol precursors, 10-deacetylbaccatin III and baccatin. In addition, plant tissues culture and several semisynthetic approaches were tested in order to produce higher amounts of Taxol. The main step forward was achieved by combining the use of 10-deacetylbaccatin III and a semisynthetic process for production of the drug. Today, Taxol and its semisynthetic soluble analog Docetaxel (Taxotere™) are manufactured in a multi-step semisynthetic process, however additional improvements are needed in order to reach future market demands of this important drug.

Similarly to Taxol, also curcumin is insoluble in water. In addition, due to reduced absorption in liver and in intestinal walls and systemic elimination, curcumin has poor bioavailability that has been mainly related to rapid metabolism, fast systemic elimination and poor absorption. Therefore, curcumin analogs have been prepared and their capability to retain therapeutic activities has been tested. One of the main modifications applied was the change of the beta-diketone in curcumin to a monocarbonyl dienone. These analogs demonstrated good bioavailability and therapeutic effect in rodents. At least two other approaches to increase curcumin’s bioavailability are being explored. The first approach takes advantage of adjuvants given with curcumin, that will block its metabolic pathways and/or increase its permeability resulting in higher blood concentrations and increase in its bioavailability, while the second technique deals with new formulations of curcumin using nanoparticles, liposomes, micelles, and phospholipid complexes.

Modifications, formulations and synthetic compounds were also developed for the Cannabis derived cannabinoid Δ9-THC. One example is cannabidiol (CBD) another natural cannabinoid from Cannabis sativa and the major component of Sativex, a drug for multiple sclerosis and cancer pain. This cannabinoid has low affinity to CB1 and CB2 and therefore has reduced psychotropic effects and it is prescribed in several European countries. Synthetic capsules of a different drug, Dronabinol, with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol as its main compound has been available in the US since 1985, while Nabilone that is a THC synthetic analog became available in 1983. Today, these drugs are also available in other countries.

Moreover, the endocannabinoid system is highly selective and has temporal specificity of activation. In the central nerve system they are not stored in vesicles but release on-demand from membrane precursors. In non-neuronal organs their expression is spatial and limited and condition-specific. For affecting different organs and have different activities development of different analogs and formulation for different conditions might be required.

Strigolactones (SLs) are a new potent group of plant hormones that might serve as anti-cancer drugs. These plant hormones were first identified about 50 years ago as germination stimulants of the parasitic plants Striga and Orobanche (; reviewed in ). This family of terpenoid lactones is synthesized through the carotenoid synthesis pathway. Their molecular backbone is built from an ABC ring system that is connected to a butenolide through an enol ether bridge. Moreover, SLs act in other developmental processes across the plants such as suppressors of outgrowth of pre-formed axillary shoot buds, and regulators of root development. Different plants produce different SLs and so far approximately 15 of these hormones have been structurally characterized. Further, synthetic analogs have been produced in different laboratories (reviewed by ).

were the first to demonstrate the effect of SLs on cancer cells. Six SLs analogs were shown to inhibit growth and survival of breast cancer cell lines. All six analogs induced G2/M arrest but differ in extent of apoptosis. Growth inhibition in normal cells treated with these analogs was observed only with the highest SL concentration used, suggesting a dose response to these molecules. In a subsequent study, inhibition was observed in both solid and non-solid cancer cells such as colon, lung, prostate, melanoma, osteosarcoma, and leukemic cell lines. Moreover, SLs were shown to act as new anti-cancer agents in inhibition of breast cancer in xenograft model with low toxicity. Although the complete mode of action has not been revealed yet, it was shown that the tested cancer cells are arrested at G2 through activation of the p38 and JNK1/2 MAPKs causing stress induction. In addition, SLs affect the integrity of the microtubule network and therefore may inhibit the migratory phenotype of the highly invasive breast cancer cell lines that were examined.

These results suggest that SLs are potent and promising anti-cancer agents that induce cell cycle arrest, cellular stress and apoptosis in cancer cells. Furthermore, the variety of SLs available in nature from different plants enables development of different analogs for a large range of cancer treatments and possibly other pathological conditions and/or personalized treatments.

Commercial Considerations and Future Prospects

The traditional belief that a single drug, “silver bullet” is sufficient to treat a single disease has been questioned. This belief relies on the premise that human diseases have a uniform underlying genetic basis across patient’s populations. However, recent advances in genomics demonstrate genetic diversity, i.e., polymorphism, implying that different patient populations may require different tailored drugs to their treatment, as personalized medicine. Moreover, the shortage in successful new chemical entities together with a focus of the pharmaceutical industry on such molecules to serve as “silver bullets” and the shift of companies from unpredictable research to a more steady businesses and revenues had created a crisis and loss of faith of public opinion in “silver bullets.”

The use of herbal medicines offers a way to alleviate this crisis in drug development. There are three main advances for herbal medicine: (1) utilizing the traditional herbal medicine knowledge may give rise to an inexpensive and more rapid discovery of new drugs; (2) herbal remedies offer a holistic approach that complements the disease targeted approach of “Silver bullets”; (3) synergy between the various components of the herbs which are an important element of their overall medical effects.

The main disadvantage related to herbal medicines is the lack of international standardization in terms of methods for evaluating their composition, efficacy, safety, and quality, consistent manufacturing practices, regulation and approval processes. Ironically, vast knowledge and experience in drug development is available in the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, combining the benefits provided by both traditional and modern medicine has been previously suggested as a promising approach in order to reveal and bring to market new plant-derived substances. However, in the last centuries only several herbal medicines or botanical drugs have been approved by health authorities for human use. Collaboration and coordination between World Health Organization (WHO), Federal Drug Administration (FDA), European and other regulatory agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry worldwide may lead to clear guidance for development of herbal medications while taking advantage of the huge potential held by traditional medicine for development of both anti-cancer and other health promoting drugs.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 145

  1. 1.

    Aggarwal B. B. Harikumar K. B. (2009 ). Potential therapeutic effects of curcumin, the anti-inflammatory agent, against neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 40–59.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2008.06.010

  2. 2.

    Aggarwal B. B. Kumar A. Bharti A. C. (2003 ). Anticancer potential of curcumin: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer. Res. 23, 363–398.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Aldington S. Harwood M. Cox B. Weatherall M. Beckert L. Hansell A. (2008 ). Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study. Eur. Respir. J. 31, 280–286.

    Not in our library10.1183/09031936.00065707

  4. 4.

    Alexander S. P. Mathie A. Peters J. A. (2008 ). Guide to receptors and channels (GRAC). Br. J. Pharmacol. 153, S1–S1.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjp.0707746

  5. 5.

    Anand P. Kunnumakkara A. B. Newman R. A. Aggarwal B. B. (2007 ). Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol. Pharm. 4, 807–818.

    Not in our library10.1021/mp700113r

  6. 6.

    Anand P. Nair H. B. Sung B. Kunnumakkara A. B. Yadav V. R. Tekmal R. R. (2010 ). Design of curcumin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles formulation with enhanced cellular uptake, and increased bioactivity in vitro and superior bioavailability in vivo. Biochem. Pharmacol. 79, 330–338.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2009.09.003

  7. 7.

    Anand P. Sundaram C. Jhurani S. Kunnumakkara A. B. Aggarwal B. B. (2008 ). Curcumin and cancer: an “old-age” disease with an “age-old” solution. Cancer Lett. 267, 133–164.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.025

  8. 8.

    Atwood B. K. Mackie K. (2010 ). CB2: a cannabinoid receptor with an identity crisis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 160, 467–479.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00729.x

  9. 9.

    Atwood B. K. Wager-Miller J. Haskins C. Straiker A. Mackie K. (2012 ). Functional selectivity in CB2 cannabinoid receptor signaling and regulation: implications for the therapeutic potential of CB2 ligands. Mol. Pharmacol. 81, 250–263.

    Not in our library10.1124/mol.111.074013

  10. 10.

    Awad N. Kassem H. Hamed M. El-Naggar M. El-Feky A. (2014 ). Bioassays guided isolation of compounds from Chaetomium globosum. J. Med. Mycol. 24, e35–e42.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.10.005

  11. 11.

    Balick M. J. Cox P. A. (1996 ). Plants, People, and Culture: the Science of Ethnobotany. New York: Scientific American Library.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Balunas M. J. Kinghorn A. D. (2005 ). Drug discovery from medicinal plants. Life Sci. 78, 431–441.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.012

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Basniwal R. K. Buttar H. S. Jain V. Jain N. (2011 ). Curcumin nanoparticles: preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 2056–2061.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf104402t

  15. 15.

    Bharadwaj R. Yu H. (2004 ). The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene 23, 2016–2027.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1207374

  16. 16.

    Buchwald-Werner S. Bischoff F. (2011 ). “Natural products-market development and potentials,” in Industrial scale natural products extraction. eds Bart H.-J. Pilz S. (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH), 247–267.

    Not in our library10.1002/9783527635122.ch8

  17. 17.

    Butler M. S. (2004 ). The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery. J. Nat. Prod. 67, 2141–2153.

    Not in our library10.1021/np040106y

  18. 18.

    Cabral G. A. Griffin-Thomas L. (2009 ). Emerging role of the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in immune regulation: therapeutic prospects for neuroinflammation. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 11, e3.

    Not in our library10.1017/s1462399409000957

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Cao J. Liu Y. Jia L. Zhou H.-M. Kong Y. Yang G. (2007 ). Curcumin induces apoptosis through mitochondrial hyperpolarization and mtDNA damage in human hepatoma G2 cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 43, 968–975.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.06.006

  21. 21.

    Capasso R. Borrelli F. Aviello G. Romano B. Scalisi C. Capasso F. (2008 ). Cannabidiol, extracted from Cannabis sativa, selectively inhibits inflammatory hypermotility in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 154, 1001–1008.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjp.2008.177

  22. 22.

    Castor T. P. Tyler T. A. (1993 ). Determination of taxol in Taxus media needles in the presence of interfering components. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 16, 723–731.

    Not in our library10.1080/10826079308019559

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Chandra S. (2012 ). Endophytic fungi: novel sources of anticancer lead molecules. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95, 47–59.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4128-7

  25. 25.

    Chang P.-Y. Peng S.-F. Lee C.-Y. Lu C.-C. Tsai S.-C. Shieh T.-M. (2013 ). Curcumin-loaded nanoparticles induce apoptotic cell death through regulation of the function of MDR1 and reactive oxygen species in cisplatin-resistant CAR human oral cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 43, 1141–1150.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2013.2050

  26. 26.

    Chatterjee S. J. Pandey S. (2011 ). Chemo-resistant melanoma sensitized by tamoxifen to low dose curcumin treatment through induction of apoptosis and autophagy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 11, 216–228.

    Not in our library10.4161/cbt.11.2.13798

  27. 27.

    Chin Y.-W. Balunas M. J. Chai H. B. Kinghorn A. D. (2006 ). Drug discovery from natural sources. AAPS J. 8, E239–E253.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02854894

  28. 28.

    Choudhary N. Sekhon B. S. (2011 ). An overview of advances in the standardization of herbal drugs. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2, 55–70.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Cook C. Whichard L. P. Turner B. Wall M. E. Egley G. H. (1966 ). Germination of witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.): isolation and properties of a potent stimulant. Science 154, 1189–1190.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.154.3753.1189

  30. 30.

    Deleu D. Hanssens Y. Northway M. (2004 ). Subcutaneous apomorphine. An evidence-based review of its use in Parkinson’s disease. Drugs Aging 21, 687–709.

    Not in our library10.2165/00002512-200421110-00001

  31. 31.

    Demain A. L. Vaishnav P. (2011 ). Natural products for cancer chemotherapy. Microb. Biotechnol. 4, 687–699.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00221.x

  32. 32.

    Denis J. N. Greene A. E. Guenard D. Gueritte-Voegelein F. Mangatal L. Potier P. (1988 ). Highly efficient, practical approach to natural taxol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 5917–5919.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja00225a063

  33. 33.

    DeSantis C. E. Lin C. C. Mariotto A. B. Siegel R. L. Stein K. D. Kramer J. L. (2014 ). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64, 252–271.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21235

  34. 34.

    Dhule S. S. Penfornis P. Frazier T. Walker R. Feldman J. Tan G. (2012 ). Curcumin-loaded γ-cyclodextrin liposomal nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for osteosarcoma. Nanomedicine 8, 440–451.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2011.07.011

  35. 35.

    Dwivedi G. Hallihosur S. Rangan L. (2010 ). Evergreening: a deceptive device in patent rights. Technol. Soc. 32, 324–330.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.009

  36. 36.

    Elbaz H. A. Stueckle T. A. Tse W. Rojanasakul Y. Dinu C. Z. (2012 ). Digitoxin and its analogs as novel cancer. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 1, 4.

    Not in our library10.1186/2162-3619-1-4

  37. 37.

    Ganguly A. Yang H. Cabral F. (2010 ). Paclitaxel-dependent cell lines reveal a novel drug activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 2914–2923.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-0552

  38. 38.

    Gaoni Y. Mechoulam R. (1964 ). Isolation, structure, and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 1646–1647.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja01062a046

  39. 39.

    García-Gutiérrez M. S. Pérez-Ortiz J. M. Gutiérrez-Adán A. Manzanares J. (2010 ). Depression-resistant endophenotype in mice overexpressing cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 160, 1773–1784.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00819.x

  40. 40.

    George J. Banik N. L. Ray S. K. (2009 ). Combination of taxol and Bcl-2 siRNA induces apoptosis in human glioblastoma cells and inhibits invasion, angiogenesis and tumour growth. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13, 4205–4218.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00539.x

All 145 references

Cited by papers we hold 10

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.