Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

E3 ubiquitin-ligases and their target proteins during the regulation of plant innate immunity

Vincent Duplan, Susana Rivas

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2014 · Review

doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00042

Abstract

Reversible protein ubiquitination plays a crucial role during the regulation of plant immune signaling. E3 ubiquitin (Ub)-ligase enzymes, which are classified into different families depending on their structural and functional features, confer the specificity of substrate and are the best characterized components of the ubiquitination cascade. E3 Ub-ligases of different families have been shown to be involved in all steps of plant immune responses. Indeed, they have been involved in the first steps of pathogen perception, as they appear to modulate perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by pattern-recognition receptors at the plasma membrane and to regulate the accumulation of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat-type intracellular immune receptors. In addition, E3 Ub-ligase proteins are also involved in the regulation of the signaling responses downstream of pathogen perception through targeting vesicle trafficking components or nuclear transcription factors, for instance. Finally, we also discuss the case of microbial effector proteins that are able to target host E3 Ub-ligases, or to act themselves as E3 Ub-ligases, in their attempt to subvert the host proteasome to promote disease.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

INTRODUCTION

Reversible protein conjugation with ubiquitin (Ub), or ubiquitination, is a key regulatory mechanism that controls a variety of cellular processes in eukaryotic cells, including DNA repair, gene transcription, protein activation or receptor trafficking, although the best characterized function of Ub involves selective protein degradation through the 26S proteasome. Ub becomes covalently attached to lysine residues of intracellular targets via an ATP-dependent reaction cascade that involves the sequential action of three enzymes: E1 (Ub-activating), E2 (Ub-conjugating), and E3 (Ub-ligase). The importance of the Ub-related pathway is underlined by the finding that the Arabidopsis genome encodes more than 1600 genes (> 6% of the total genome) involved in Ub/26S proteasome system (UPS)-related functions. Most of these genes (> 1400) encode putative E3 Ub-ligases. E3 proteins are classified into four main subfamilies depending on their structural features and mechanism of action: HECT (Homologous to E6-associated protein C-Terminus), RING (Really Interesting New Gene), U-Box and CRL (Cullin-RING Ligases; ). HECT proteins form an Ub-E3 intermediate before transfer of Ub to the substrate. RING and U-box proteins are structurally related single polypeptides that, respectively, use zinc chelation and hydrogen bonds/salt bridges to transfer Ub from the Ub-E2 intermediate to the target. Ub-ligases containing a RING domain can act independently or as part of a multisubunit CRL complex such as the SCF (Skp1, Cullin, F-box)-type ligase. In this complex, substrate recognition is provided by the F-box protein, whereas the RING protein binds to the E2. By contrast, some RING-type Ub-ligases act independently and determine substrate specificity allowing the interaction between the E2 and the target protein by tethering them in close proximity.

Plants have developed a multi-layered defense system to ensure their survival in a microbe-rich environment. A first line of pathogen detection is activated after recognition of highly conserved PAMPs/MAMPs (pathogen-/microbe-associated molecular patterns) by specific plant PRRs (pattern-recognition receptors), leading to a form of basal resistance called PTI (PAMP-triggered immunity; ). Thriving pathogens evolved to secrete virulence effectors that inactivate crucial PTI regulators thereby counteracting plant defenses. In turn, plants gained the ability to recognize these effectors through resistance (R) proteins, for the most part intracellular NB-LRR (nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat) immune sensors, that lead to a more efficient form of resistance called ETI (effector-triggered immunity; ). This specific resistance is frequently associated to development of the hypersensitive response (HR), a form of programmed cell death at the infection site that prevents pathogen spreading.

In plants, the UPS pathway, and more particularly E3 Ub-ligase proteins, have been shown to be involved in responses to a variety of stimuli. Since the finding that the SCF complex-interacting protein SGT1 (Suppressor of G2 allele of skp1) is an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance provided a first connection between the UPS and plant immune signaling, evidence that E3 Ub-ligase proteins act as regulators of plant immunity has increasingly accumulated. Indeed, modulation of the expression of E3 Ub-ligase-encoding genes has been reported following elicitor treatment or inoculation with different pathogens. Moreover, misregulation of E3 Ub-ligase gene expression, using overexpressing, RNA interference (RNAi) and/or mutant lines, results in modulation of plant defense responses following pathogen inoculation [reviewed in]. Therefore, it has become increasingly evident that plant E3 Ub-ligase proteins play important roles in the regulation of immune signaling, although the proteins targeted by Ub-ligases are only known in a limited number of cases, and our current knowledge of the involved molecular mechanisms is thus only partial. Here we review positive and negative roles played by E3 Ub-ligases during the regulation of various steps of plant immunity, from pathogen recognition to downstream signaling during both PTI and ETI responses. Due to space limitations, we focus on recent reports about E3 Ub-ligases for which a target protein has been identified during the plant response to bacterial or fungal pathogens, since these particular examples provide insight into the cellular processes involved in regulation of immune signaling. For an overview on UPS-related pathways in response to viral infection we refer the reader to a recent review. We also discuss the case of microbial effectors that, to promote disease, either target host E3 Ub-ligases or act as Ub-ligases inside plant cells (Figure 1).

PLANT E3 UB-LIGASES INVOLVED IN REGULATION OF PATHOGEN PERCEPTION

Several E3 ligase proteins have been identified as modulators of the first steps of pathogen recognition by plant cells, as they appear to be able to target both PRR and NB-LRR proteins in order to prevent unnecessary activation of defense signaling. In rice (Oryza sativa), the RING-type E3 Ub-ligase XB3 interacts with the receptor-like kinase (RLK) protein XA21, which confers resistance to bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo; ). XB3 has been shown to be required for XA21 accumulation and XA21-mediated resistance to Xoo, suggesting that it most likely targets a protein that modulates accumulation of XA21. XA21 is able to phosphorylate XB3 but the molecular mechanism underlining activation of defense responses by XB3 remains to be elucidated. Overexpression of members of the XB3 family from rice, Arabidopsis and citrus in Nicotiana benthamiana induces cell death and this effect is dependent on XB3 catalytic activity, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved role for the XB3 protein family in regulating plant programmed cell death.

In Arabidopsis, the U-box E3 ligases Plant U-Box12 (PUB12) and PUB13 have been involved in attenuation of PTI responses triggered by perception of flagellin, or its active peptide derivative flg22, by the PRRs Flagellin Sensing2 (FLS2) and its co-receptor BAK1. In response to flg22, PUB12 and PUB13 form a BAK1-dependent complex with FLS2 and are able to polyubiquitinate FLS2, but not BAK1. BAK1 phosphorylates PUB12 and PUB13 and this phosphorylation is enhanced by flg22 and by the FLS2/BAK1-associated kinase BIK1. flg22-dependent signaling is enhanced in pub12 or pub13 mutant plants and, in agreement with PUB12 and PUB13 promoting FLS2 degradation, pub12 pub13 double mutant plants displayed increased resistance to bacterial infection. These data are consistent with the fact that FLS2 undergoes flg22-induced endocytosis and subsequent degradation. However, whether stabilization of FLS2 in pub12pub13 plants reflects FLS2 accumulation at the plasma membrane or within an endosomal compartment remains to be determined. A recent report showed that FLS2 degradation occurs in a flg22 time- and dose-dependent manner, which may play a significant role in turning over ligand-occupied FLS2, but the role of PUB12 and PUB13 in this process was not determined in this study.

Similar to PRR proteins, intracellular NB-LRR immune receptors are also targeted by E3 Ub-ligases, which appear to control R protein accumulation at multiple levels. First, in Arabidopsis, the F-box motif E3 Ub-ligase CPR1 interacts with and down-regulates the accumulation of the NB-LRR R proteins Suppressor of npr1-1 Constitutive1 (SNC1) and Resistant to P. syringae2 (RPS2), resulting in attenuation of immune signaling. Second, accumulation of SNC1 and RPS4, an additional NB-LRR immune receptor, are also negatively regulated by Suppressor of rps4-RLD1 (SRFR1), a tetratricopeptide repeat protein. Since (i) SNC1 levels increased in CPR1-overexpressing plants treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132; (ii) SRFR1 interacts with SGT1; and (iii) increased SNC1 and RPS4 accumulation was also observed in sgt1 mutant plants, stability of SNC1 and RPS4 is likely regulated by SRFR1 through SGT1 interaction with the SCF complex, revealing an additional molecular mechanism to prevent autoimmnunity. Third, mutation of MOS12 (modifier of snc1-12), that encodes an Arabidopsis Arg-rich protein homologous to human cyclin L, resulted in altered SNC1 and RPS4 splicing patterns and protein levels. Interestingly, MOS12 interacts with the nuclear U-Box E3 ligases MAC3A and MAC3B, which are required for full R protein-mediated resistance, suggesting that MOS12, MAC3A, and MAC3B contribute to the fine-tuning of R gene expression, in a process that appears to be critical for directing appropriate defense outputs. Finally, a recent report showed an intriguing link between cell cycle regulation and defense signaling. Omission of the Second Division (OSD1) and its homolog UV-B-Insensitive 4 (UVI4) are two negative regulators of the multisubunit E3 Ub-ligase APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) that regulates cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of either OSD1 or UVI4 leads to downregulation of APC/C activity, overaccumulation of the APC/C degradation target CYCB1;1, upregulation of several R genes, including SNC1, and spontaneous cell death and enhanced disease resistance to virulent bacteria. These data provide further evidence of the intricate control exerted on immune receptor levels in order to regulate defense activation.

PLANT E3 UB-LIGASES INVOLVED IN REGULATION OF DEFENSE-RELATED SIGNALING

Pathogen perception by PRRs stimulates a cascade of signaling events including changes in ion fluxes across the plasma membrane, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), induction of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), modulation of host gene transcription and callose deposition at the plant cell wall. Amplitude and duration of these signaling responses must be tightly regulated to ensure an appropriate response. In addition to their role in internalization or degradation of receptors to attenuate downstream signaling, E3 Ub-ligase proteins also regulate the accumulation of plant components involved in defense-related signaling.

Similar to PUB12 and PUB13, PUB22 acts in concert with PUB23 and PUB24 to negatively regulate PTI responses in Arabidopsis. Following elicitation with various PAMPs, pub22/pub23/pub24 triple mutants displayed enhanced early signaling responses, indicating that these three PUB proteins target components involved in defense signaling triggered by different PRRs. Indeed, the exocyst complex subunit Exo70B2 that is involved in vesicle tethering during exocytosis, has been identified as a cellular target of PUB22. PUB22 is stabilized in response to flg22 treatment (potentially by inhibition of its autocatalytic ubiquitination activity), leading to Exo70B2 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Exo70B2 is required for both immediate (ROS production, MAPK activation) and later responses (PTI marker gene expression, root growth inhibition) triggered by several PAMPs, indicative of a role in signaling. Indeed, exo70B2 mutant plants displayed enhanced susceptibility to pathogens. Together, these data suggest a mechanism by which Exo70B2 levels are regulated by quick changes in PUB22 turnover in response to PAMPs and identify a first component of vesicle trafficking required for regulation of plant PTI signaling. In view of these data, it has been proposed that Exo70B2 may contribute to recycling of plasma membrane proteins involved in PAMP-triggered signaling, including NADPH oxidases, ion channels or RLKs such as FLS2. Exo70B2 degradation by PUB22 would thus attenuate the recycling pathway redirecting positive signaling components into the vacuolar degradation pathway and downregulating signaling. As previously discussed, PUB12/PUB13-mediated ubiquitination of FLS2 is expected to modulate its intracellular trafficking. Since degradation of integral membrane proteins is mediated by the vacuole, signal attenuation is probably simultaneously regulated at various levels of vesicle trafficking.

In Chinese wild grapevine (Vitis pseudoreticulata), EIRP1 is an active E3 Ub-ligase whose RING domain is necessary for its activity and also mediates the interaction with the WRKY nuclear transcription factor (TF) VpWRKY11. Similar to EIRP1, expression of VpWRKY11 was rapidly induced following fungal infection. VpWRKY11 activated the expression of AOS (Allene Oxide Synthase) and LOX2 (Lipoxygenase2), two JA-responsive genes that function as negative regulators of basal resistance in Arabidopsis. Additionally, in agreement with the observation that co-expression with EIRP1 results in proteasomal degradation of VpWRKY11, AOS and LOX2 expression was, respectively, repressed and induced in EIRP1-overexpressing and RNAi plants. Moreover, EIRP1 overexpression in Arabidopsis conferred enhanced resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens, which correlated with reduced expression of WRKY11, AOS, and LOX2. Together, these data identify a RING-type Ub-ligase that plays a positive role in activation of resistance by targeting a TF that acts as a negative regulator of plant defenses.

In contrast, the Arabidopsis RING-type Ub-ligase MIEL1 acts as a negative regulator of plant resistance. Indeed, MIEL1 interacts with the MYB TF MYB30, which activates plant defense responses by up-regulating the expression of genes involved in the production of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs; ). The MYB30-MIEL1 nuclear interaction leads to MYB30 proteasomal degradation, reduced expression of VLCFA-related MYB30 target gene expression and, therefore, attenuation of plant immune responses. MIEL1 expression is rapidly repressed in inoculated cells, suggesting that (i) in the absence of the pathogen, MIEL1 may negatively regulate plant defense activation through degradation of MYB30 and that (ii) after pathogen inoculation, repression of MIEL1 expression may release MYB30 negative regulation, triggering defense.

BOI1 is an additional nuclear RING-type Ub-ligase that interacts with and ubiquitinates the MYB TF BOS1, which confers resistance to several pathogens in Arabidopsis. This finding suggests that BOS1 may be a target of BOI1. However, no effect of BOI1 on BOS1 transcriptional activity has been reported and both bos1 mutant and BOI1 RNAi Arabidopsis plants (in which the BOS1 protein is expected to accumulate) display enhanced susceptibility to fungal infection. Therefore, whether BOI1 is able to directly regulate BOS1 protein accumulation remains to be determined.

MANIPULATION OF HOST E3 UB-LIGASE PROTEINS BY MICROBIAL EFFECTORS

The important role played by E3 Ub-ligases during the establishment of plant immune responses to pathogen attack is highlighted by the discovery of microbial effector proteins that evolved the ability to interfere with these host UPS components to promote disease. For example, the AvrPiz-t effector from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae is translocated into rice cells, where it is able to mediate suppression of PAMP-induced ROS production, inducing susceptibility to M. oryzae. AvrPiz-t appears to inhibit the Ub-ligase activity of APIP6, a rice RING-type Ub-ligase that is also able to ubiquitinate AvrPiz-t in vitro. Interestingly, AvrPiz-t and APIP6 are both degraded when transiently coexpressed in N. benthamiana. Since APIP6 positively regulates flg22-induced ROS generation, induction of defense-related gene expression, and rice resistance to M. oryzae, targeting of APIP6 by AvrPiz-t results in suppression of rice PTI responses.

The effector AVR3a from the oomycete Phytophthora infestans prevents development of cell death induced by P. infestans elicitin INF1. The finding that AVR3a targets and stabilizes the U-box-type Ub-ligase CMPG1 revealed the molecular mechanism behind AVR3a negative regulation of ICD (INF1-triggered Cell Death; ). CMPG1 Ub-ligase activity is required for ICD as well as for cell death following elicitor perception at the plasma membrane. Considering that AVR3a is essential for P. infestans virulence, stabilization of CMPG1 by AVR3a suggests that this effector is able to suppress ICD during the biotrophic phase of infection by modifying CMPG1 activity, impeding normal proteasomal degradation of both CMPG1 and its host targets.

In addition to microbial effectors that are able to target host E3 Ub-ligase proteins, examples of effectors that present E3 Ub-ligase-related domains have also been reported in a diversity of pathogenic microbes including bacteria, fungi, oomycetes, viruses and nematodes. The best characterized example of microbial E3 ligases is the AvrPtoB effector from Pseudomonas syringae that presents a C-terminal domain with remarkable structural homology with RING- and U-box-type Ub-ligases. AvrPtoB is a modular effector able to suppress PTI signaling. Indeed, AvrPtoB N-terminal domain is able to interact with the PRRs FLS2 and the chitin receptor CERK1, whereas its C-terminal Ub-ligase domain mediates PRR proteasomal degradation. AvrPtoB is additionally able to target the co-receptor protein BAK1 and to interfere with MAPK activation downstream of FLS2, although independently of AvrPtoB Ub-ligase activity. Remarkably, AvrPtoB is also able to suppress ETI signaling. Indeed, AvrPtoB interacts with and mediates proteasomal degradation of Fen, a tomato protein kinase that activates plant immunity in response to P. syringae carrying Ub-ligase deficient forms of AvrPtoB, as well as cell death responses when overexpressed in N. benthamiana.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Evidence of the involvement of the UPS pathway in the regulation of plant immunity is rapidly mounting. E3 Ub-ligase proteins are the best characterized UPS components playing a role in immune signaling at multiple levels. Nevertheless, based on induction of their expression following elicitation, E1 and E2 enzymes have also been suggested to contribute to plant disease resistance although the molecular mechanisms by which they regulate this process remain poorly characterized. Interestingly, a recent report provides a first example of the direct involvement of Ub-conjugating proteins in the regulation of plant immunity. In tomato, Fen-interacting protein 3 (Fni3) is a homolog of the Arabidopsis E2 enzyme Ubc13. Through interaction with its cofactor S. lycoperiscum Uev (Suv), which is an inactive Ub-conjugating enzyme variant, Fni3 catalyzes Lys-63-linked ubiquitination, a non-proteolytic regulatory signal. Fni3 interacts with Fen but does not affect Fen stability. Fni3 Ub-conjugating activity and interaction with Fen are required for cell death triggered by Fen overexpression in N. benthamiana and by several R protein/effector pairs. Together these results suggest that, in addition to conventional Lys-48-linked ubiquitination that mainly serves as a signal for proteasomal degradation of substrate proteins, other ubiquitination forms are important regulators of plant immune signaling. Consistent with this idea, Lys-63-linked ubiquitination has also been shown to be a target of manipulation by plant pathogens, as the PthA effector from the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri is able to target Ubc13 and Uev in citrus.

In conclusion, further characterization of additional UPS components as well as of the distinct fates of ubiquitination targets should contribute to dissecting the complex regulation of plant immune signaling by the UPS.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 47

  1. 1.

    Alcaide-Loridan C. Jupin I. (2012 ). Ubiquitin and plant viruses, let’s play together! Plant Physiol. 160 72–82

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.201905

  2. 2.

    Azevedo C. Sadanandom A. Kitagawa K. Freialdenhoven A. Shirasu K. Schulze-Lefert P. (2002 ). The RAR1 interactor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 295 2073–2076

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1067554

  3. 3.

    Bao Z. Yang H. Hua J. (2013 ). Perturbation of cell cycle regulation triggers plant immune response via activation of disease resistance genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 2407–2412

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1217024110

  4. 4.

    Beck M. Zhou J. Faulkner C. MacLean D. Robatzek S. (2012 ). Spatio-temporal cellular dynamics of the Arabidopsis flagellin receptor reveal activation status-dependent endosomal sorting. Plant Cell 24 4205–4219

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.100263

  5. 5.

    Bos J. I. Armstrong M. R. Gilroy E. M. Boevink P. C. Hein I. Taylor R. M. (2010 ). Phytophthora infestans effector AVR3a is essential for virulence and manipulates plant immunity by stabilizing host E3 ligase CMPG1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 9909–9914

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0914408107

  6. 6.

    Cheng Y. T. Li Y. Huang S. Huang Y. Dong X. Zhang Y. (2011 ). Stability of plant immune-receptor resistance proteins is controlled by SKP1-CULLIN1-F-box (SCF)-mediated protein degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 14694–14699

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1105685108

  7. 7.

    Choi S. W. Tamaki T. Ebine K. Uemura T. Ueda T. Nakano A. (2013 ). RABA members act in distinct steps of subcellular trafficking of the Flagellin Sensing2 receptor. Plant Cell 25 1174–1187

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.108803

  8. 8.

    Coll N. S. Epple P. Dangl J. L. (2011 ). Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death Differ. 18 1247–1256

    Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2011.37

  9. 9.

    Domingues M. N. De Souza T. A. Cernadas R. A. de Oliveira M. L. Docena C. Farah C. S. (2010 ). The Xanthomonas citri effector protein PthA interacts with citrus proteins involved in nuclear transport, protein folding and ubiquitination associated with DNA repair. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11 663–675

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00636.x

  10. 10.

    Downes B. P. Stupar R. M. Gingerich D. J. Vierstra R. D. (2003 ). The HECT ubiquitin-protein ligase (UPL) family in Arabidopsis: UPL3 has a specific role in trichome development. Plant J. 35 729–742

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01844.x

  11. 11.

    Gilroy E. M. Taylor R. M. Hein I. Boevink P. Sadanandom A. Birch P. R. (2011 ). CMPG1-dependent cell death follows perception of diverse pathogen elicitors at the host plasma membrane and is suppressed by Phytophthora infestans RXLR effector AVR3a. New Phytol. 190 653–666

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03643.x

  12. 12.

    Gimenez-Ibanez S. Hann D. R. Ntoukakis V. Petutschnig E. Lipka V. Rathjen J. P. (2009 ). AvrPtoB targets the LysM receptor kinase CERK1 to promote bacterial virulence on plants. Curr. Biol. 19 423–429

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.054

  13. 13.

    Gohre V. Spallek T. Haweker H. Mersmann S. Mentzel T. Boller T. (2008 ). Plant pattern-recognition receptor FLS2 is directed for degradation by the bacterial ubiquitin ligase AvrPtoB. Curr. Biol. 18 1824–1832

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.063

  14. 14.

    Gonzalez-Lamothe R. Tsitsigiannis D. I. Ludwig A. A. Panicot M. Shirasu K. Jones J. D. (2006 ). The U-box protein CMPG1 is required for efficient activation of defense mechanisms triggered by multiple resistance genes in tobacco and tomato. Plant Cell 18 1067–1083

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.040998

  15. 15.

    Gou M. Shi Z. Zhu Y. Bao Z. Wang G. Hua J. (2012 ). The F-box protein CPR1/CPR30 negatively regulates R protein SNC1 accumulation. Plant J. 69 411–420

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04799.x

  16. 16.

    He P. Shan L. Lin N. C. Martin G. B. Kemmerling B. Nurnberger T. (2006 ). Specific bacterial suppressors of MAMP signaling upstream of MAPKKK in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Cell 125 563–575

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.047

  17. 17.

    Hua Z. Vierstra R. D. (2011 ). The cullin-RING ubiquitin-protein ligases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62 299–334

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112256

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    Janjusevic R. Abramovitch R. B. Martin G. B. Stebbins C. E. (2006 ). A bacterial inhibitor of host programmed cell death defenses is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 311 222–226

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1120131

  20. 20.

    Jones J. D. Dangl J. L. (2006 ). The plant immune system. Nature 444 323–329

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05286

  21. 21.

    Journot-Catalino N. Somssich I. E. Roby D. Kroj T. (2006 ). The transcription factors WRKY11 and WRKY17 act as negative regulators of basal resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 18 3289–3302

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.044149

  22. 22.

    Kim S. H. Gao F. Bhattacharjee S. Adiasor J. A. Nam J. C. Gassmann W. (2010 ). The Arabidopsis resistance-like gene SNC1 is activated by mutations in SRFR1 and contributes to resistance to the bacterial effector AvrRps4. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001172

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1001172

  23. 23.

    Li Y. Li S. Bi D. Cheng Y. T. Li X. Zhang Y. (2010 ). SRFR1 negatively regulates plant NB-LRR resistance protein accumulation to prevent autoimmunity. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001111

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1001111

  24. 24.

    Lu D. Lin W. Gao X. Wu S. Cheng C. Avila J. (2011 ). Direct ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptor FLS2 attenuates plant innate immunity. Science 332 1439–1442

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1204903

  25. 25.

    Luo H. Laluk K. Lai Z. Veronese P. Song F. Mengiste T. (2010 ). The Arabidopsis Botrytis Susceptible1 Interactor defines a subclass of RING E3 ligases that regulate pathogen and stress responses. Plant Physiol. 154 1766–1782

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.163915

  26. 26.

    Marino D. Froidure S. Canonne J. Ben Khaled S. Khafif M. Pouzet C. (2013 ). Arabidopsis ubiquitin ligase MIEL1 mediates degradation of the transcription factor MYB30 weakening plant defence. Nat. Commun. 4 1476

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms2479

  27. 27.

    Marino D. Peeters N. Rivas S. (2012 ). Ubiquitination during plant immune signaling. Plant Physiol. 160 15–27

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.199281

  28. 28.

    Mazzucotelli E. Belloni S. Marone D. De Leonardis A. Guerra D. Di Fonzo N. (2006 ). The E3 ubiquitin ligase gene family in plants: regulation by degradation. Curr. Genomics 7 509–522

    Not in our library10.2174/138920206779315728

  29. 29.

    Mengiste T. Chen X. Salmeron J. Dietrich R. (2003 ). The BOTRYTIS SUSCEPTIBLE1 gene encodes an R2R3MYB transcription factor protein that is required for biotic and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15 2551–2565

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.014167

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Mural R. V. Liu Y. Rosebrock T. R. Brady J. J. Hamera S. Connor R. A. (2013 ). The tomato Fni3 lysine-63-specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and suv ubiquitin e2 variant positively regulate plant immunity. Plant Cell 25 3615–3631

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.113.117093

  32. 32.

    Park C. H. Chen S. Shirsekar G. Zhou B. Khang C. H. Songkumarn P. (2012 ). The Magnaporthe oryzae Effector AvrPiz-t Targets the RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligase APIP6 to Suppress Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern-Triggered Immunity in Rice. Plant Cell 24 4748–4762

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.105429

  33. 33.

    Raffaele S. Vailleau F. Leger A. Joubes J. Miersch O. Huard C. (2008 ). A MYB transcription factor regulates Very-Long-Chain Fatty Acid biosynthesis for activation of the hypersensitive cell death response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20 752–767

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.107.054858

  34. 34.

    Robatzek S. Chinchilla D. Boller T. (2006 ). Ligand-induced endocytosis of the pattern recognition receptor FLS2 in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 20 537–542

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.366506

  35. 35.

    Robert-Seilaniantz A. Grant M. Jones J. D. (2011 ). Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49 317–343

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447

  36. 36.

    Rosebrock T. R. Zeng L. Brady J. J. Abramovitch R. B. Xiao F. Martin G. B. (2007 ). A bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase targets a host protein kinase to disrupt plant immunity. Nature 448 370–374

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05966

  37. 37.

    Shan L. He P. Li J. Heese A. Peck S. C. Nurnberger T. (2008 ). Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 4 17–27

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.017

  38. 38.

    Smith J. M. Salamango D. J. Leslie M. E. Collins C. A. Heese A. (2013 ). Sensitivity to flg22 is modulated by ligand-induced degradation and de novo synthesis of the endogenous flagellin-receptor FLS2. Plant Physiol. 164 440–454

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.113.229179

  39. 39.

    Stegmann M. Anderson R. G. Ichimura K. Pecenkova T. Reuter P. Zarsky V. (2012 ). The ubiquitin ligase PUB22 targets a subunit of the exocyst complex required for PAMP-triggered responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 4703–4716

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.104463

  40. 40.

    Stone S. L. Hauksdottir H. Troy A. Herschleb J. Kraft E. Callis J. (2005 ). Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 137 13–30

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.104.052423

All 47 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.