Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses

José A. O’Brien, Eva Benková

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2013 · Review

doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00451

Abstract

As sessile organisms, plants have to be able to adapt to a continuously changing environment. Plants that perceive some of these changes as stress signals activate signaling pathways to modulate their development and to enable them to survive. The complex responses to environmental cues are to a large extent mediated by plant hormones that together orchestrate the final plant response. The phytohormone cytokinin is involved in many plant developmental processes. Recently, it has been established that cytokinin plays an important role in stress responses, but does not act alone. Indeed, the hormonal control of plant development and stress adaptation is the outcome of a complex network of multiple synergistic and antagonistic interactions between various hormones. Here, we review the recent findings on the cytokinin function as part of this hormonal network. We focus on the importance of the crosstalk between cytokinin and other hormones, such as abscisic acid, jasmonate, salicylic acid, ethylene, and auxin in the modulation of plant development and stress adaptation. Finally, the impact of the current research in the biotechnological industry will be discussed.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

INTRODUCTION

During their lifespan, plants are exposed to continuously changing environmental conditions and pathogen threats. Various abiotic and biotic stresses, such as heat, cold, drought, high salinity, or pathogen attacks, can severely affect plant development, growth, fertility, and productivity. To survive, plants must be able to react rapidly to various stress signals, activate efficient defense responses, and adapt to new conditions. Plant hormones are key components of these defense and adaptation mechanisms. To mediate the responses and adaptations to stresses, different hormonal pathways are upregulated or downregulated. Modifications in the hormonal abundance and signaling will usually impact on the degree of resistance or susceptibility to the various stresses.

HORMONES AND ABIOTIC STRESSES

Plants can perceive and respond to environmental changes. For instance, seasonal variations in day/night length or in temperature might directly affect the reproductive cycle, flowering, and fruit set. However, unpredicted changes, such as flooding, extreme temperature, heavy metals, drought, or high salt levels, will be perceived as stress conditions and might have a strongly negative impact on grain yield, grain weight, and plant biomass. Likewise, the root system architecture will adapt in terms of growth and branching as a reaction to different stresses. Among the various stress conditions, salinity and drought are currently the major problems. Saline soils represent a total of 323 million hectares worldwide, whereas drought affects 1–3% of the land surface and is predicted to increase to up to 30% by 2090. To cope with these stresses, plants modify the levels of the different phytohormones directly or indirectly. This altered hormonal balance also affects the plant development, with a direct impact on seed development, seed germination, dormancy, and overall plant growth.

ABSCISIC ACID –THE ABIOTIC STRESS HORMONE

In response to abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity, endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) levels increase rapidly, activating specific signaling pathways and modifying gene expression levels. In fact, up to 10% of protein-encoding genes are transcriptionally regulated by ABA.

Abscisic acid is one of the most studied phytohormone because of its rapid response and prominent role in plant adaptation to abiotic stresses. In the meantime, the key components of the ABA signaling pathway have been characterized. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the pyrabactin resistance1 (PYR1)/PYR1-LIKE (PYL)/regulatory components of ABA receptor (RCAR) proteins have been proposed as the main intracellular ABA receptors. Multiple ABA receptor loss-of-function mutants, such as pyr1/pyl1/pyl4, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4/pyl5/pyl8 are insensitive to ABA, even at concentrations as high as 100 μM. Particularly, the quadruple and sextuple mutants were less sensitive to the ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination, root growth, stomata closure, and expression of ABA responsive genes. Accordingly, PYL5 overexpression resulted in high drought resistance and an enhanced response to ABA.

In the presence of ABA, the PYR/PYL/RCAR proteins form a ternary complex that via direct interaction inhibit clade A protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C), including ABA-INSENSITIVE 1 (ABI1), ABI2, and hypersensitive to ABA 1 (HAB1). Similarly to the receptor mutants, mutants in the PP2C activity, such as abi1-1, are also insensitive to ABA. PP2C repression activates downstream targets, such as the protein kinases belonging to the sucrose non-fermenting 1-related subfamily2 SnRK2.2/D, SnRK2.3/I, and SnRK2.6/OST1/E, which trigger ABA-dependent gene expression and signaling. Accordingly, the snrk2.2/snrk2.3/snrk2.6 triple mutant is highly insensitive to ABA and severely affects plant growth and seed yield.

CYTOKININ IN ABIOTIC STRESS RESPONSES

Besides ABA, other hormonal pathways, including cytokinin (CK), are activated when a plant is exposed to stress. The CK-dependent modulation of stress responses has been studied at various levels. The alteration of endogenous CK levels in reaction to stress suggests that this hormone is involved in stress responses. For instance, in response to drought, the in planta concentration and transport of trans-zeatin riboside decreases drastically, whereas the ABA levels increase. Interestingly, when the partial root zone-drying approach was applied, the CK concentration decreased, not only in roots, but also in leaves, buds, and shoot tips, along with increased ABA levels. These observations demonstrate that the local stress exerted on the root might trigger changes in the CK levels in various plant organs, including the shoot, and, consequently, in developmental processes, such as the apical dominance. Typically, reduced CK levels would enhance the apical dominance, which, together with the ABA regulation of the stomatal aperture, aids to adapt to drought stress.

The negative CK-regulatory function in plants exposed to drought has been demonstrated in genetic studies in which the endogenous CK levels were modified, either by loss of the biosynthesis genes isopentyl transferase (IPT) or by overexpression of cytokinin oxidase (CKX)-encoding degradation genes. A reduced CK content in the ipt1/ipt3/ipt5/ipt7 quadruple and ipt8 single mutants or overexpression of CKX1 and its homologscorrelates with an increased resistance to both salt and drought stresses.

In agreement with the increased abiotic stress resistance at low CK levels, mutants lacking the functional CK receptors are more resistant to abiotic stresses. For example, the Arabidopsis histidine kinase (AHK) loss-of-function mutants ahk2/ahk3 and ahk3/ahk4 were significantly more resistant to freezing temperatures than the wild type. Similarly, all ahk single and multiple mutants, with the exception of ahk4, showed an enhanced resistance to dehydration. Furthermore, like the CK-metabolic mutants ipt1/ipt3/ipt5/ipt7, ipt8, and the CKX1-overexpressing plants, the ahk mutants affected dramatically the ABA sensitivity and were hypersensitive to ABA treatments.

Downstream of the AHK receptors, the Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer (AHP) proteins mediate stress signaling. AHP proteins translocate into the nucleus and activate the type-B Arabidopsis response regulator (ARR) factors that trigger the transcription of specific genes in response to CK. A negative feedback loop is provided by type-A ARRs that inhibit the activity of type-B ARRs by a still unknown mechanism (Figure 1). Of all ARRs, type-A ARRs are the only ones of which the expression is altered under stress, e.g., ARR5, ARR6, ARR7, and ARR15 are upregulated upon cold stress; ARR5, ARR7, ARR15, and type-C ARR22 are upregulated in response to dehydration; and ARR5 expression increases in response to salt stress. Stimulation of ARR5, ARR6, ARR7, and ARR15 expression in response to cold stress requires the activity of several components of the CK signaling pathway, including AHP2, AHP3, and AHP5, and also ARR1. Likewise, in response to salt stress, ARR5 upregulation depends on ARR1 and ARR12. Furthermore, the negative regulatory role of AHP2, AHP3, and AHP5 during drought stress has been described recently.

Despite the clear indications that CK and the CK signaling components function in stress responses, the high degree of redundancy in the CK signaling pathway, including three CK receptors, six AHPs, 10 type-A ARRs, and 11 type-B ARRs, makes it difficult to dissect the role of each specific component. Interestingly, although CK levels are reduced, the type-A ARRs that belong to the early CK-responsive genes are upregulated. Furthermore, a quadruple type-A ARR loss-of-function mutant arr3/arr4/arr5/arr6 is resistant to salt stress, which is unexpected because to type-A ARRs act as CK signaling repressors. These observations imply that in stress responses the role played by the CK signaling pathway is more complex. In this context, AHKs might function as stress sensors that would activate the CK signaling pathway independently of CK levels. In fact, another member of the histidine kinase family, AHK1, is able to sense and transduce changes in osmolarity to trigger downstream signaling pathways. However, unlike the CK receptors AHK2, AHK3, and AHK4, AHK1 positively regulates stress responses. Thus, it remains to be elucidated whether AHK2, AHK3, or AHK4 can sense abiotic stresses independently of CK, or whether AHK1 might crosstalk with a downstream CK signaling cascade.

Besides core components of the CK transduction cascade, downstream targets in stress responses have been disclosed as well. The cytokinin response factor (CRF) transcription factors of the APETALA2 (AP2) family have been identified as early CK response genes of which the expression is rapidly induced after CK application. Interestingly, the CRF6 homolog is also highly responsive to various abiotic stress treatments and, recently, its regulatory role has been characterized in leaf senescence control.

HORMONAL CROSSTALKS AND ABIOTIC STRESS RESPONSES

The altered ABA sensitivity in plants with modified CK levels and signaling hints at a crosstalk between ABA and CK. Interestingly, ARR4, ARR5, and ARR6 have been found to interact with ABI5 and also to regulate its expression levels. ABI5 is a basic leucine zipper protein that positively regulates the ABA signaling. The interaction with type-A ARRs attenuates the ABI5 activity and suppresses the ABA signaling (Figure 1; ). Thus, type-A ARRs might, in addition to their regulation of the CK signaling, also control ABA signaling.

New insights into the ABA-CK crosstalk have been gained from the functional analysis of ABI4, that belong to the AP2 family of transcription factors. Similar to ABI5, ABI4 is also a positive regulator of the ABA signaling and of the type-A ARR5 expression that represses the CK signaling. Simultaneously, ABI4 attenuates the expression of the PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1) gene, an auxin efflux carrier that is an essential component of the polar auxin transport machinery. Thus, ABI4 might represent an important crosstalk point on the interface of ABA, CK, and auxin pathways (Figure 1), in agreement with observations demonstrating that both the levels of CK and auxin, as well as of the PIN3 and PIN7 auxin efflux carriers, are suppressed when the ABA level increases. Altogether, the strong impact of stress on plant development might result from the combined activities of several hormonal pathways, such as ABA and development-related hormones, such as CK and auxin.

The hormonal pathway of ethylene (ET) contributes also to the complexity of the hormonal network underlying plant responses to stresses. ET has been studied both in a developmental and stress context and, recently, its role as a negative regulator of freezing tolerance has been demonstrated. The ET activity in stress responses is mediated by the downstream transcription factor of the ET signaling cascade, ethylene-insensitive 3 (EIN3). EIN3 suppresses the expression of the C-repeat/dehydration response element-binding factor 1 (CBF1), CBF2, and CBF3 genes, which mediate the response to cold stress, and also of the CK signaling repressors ARR5, ARR7, and ARR15 by direct binding to their promoters. Although ET interferes with the CK signaling output, its pathway is also affected by CK. Indeed, CK stabilizes 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 5 (ACS5) and ACS9 that convert S-adenosyl-methionine to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), the rate-limiting step in the ET biosynthesis. This stabilization might lead to an ET accumulation and, consequently, affect plant growth processes, such as root growth. The complexity of the hormonal regulatory network underlying stress responses has been suggested by the activation of both CK and ET signaling in response to selenite-induced stress by means of the ARR5 and ACS8 markers and decrease in the auxin levels.

Interestingly, the CK-ET and CK-ABA interactions exhibit tissue-specific features. CK treatments have been demonstrated to promote the ABA accumulation in shoots, but not in roots, in contrast to ET that accumulates predominantly in roots in response to high CK levels.

PLANT HORMONES IN RESPONSES TO BIOTIC STRESSES

Hormones also tightly regulate plant responses against pathogens. The networks that control the immune responses in plants are highly complex and have been extensively reviewed. The best characterized hormones that play a role in pathogen response/defense are salicylic acid (SA), jasmonate (JA), and ET. Depending on the lifestyle of the pathogens, a different response will be triggered by the plant. Against biotrophic pathogens, the resistance largely depends on SA-mediated responses and the principal defense strategy is programmed cell death (apoptosis) that restricts the biotrophic pathogen to the infection site, preventing its proliferation, and further spreading in the plant. In contrast, for necrotrophic pathogens that feed on death tissue only, cell death is beneficial. These pathogens induce defense responses that depend on JA and ET to prevent cell death and that trigger the secretion of antimicrobial compounds and the accumulation of proteins with antimicrobial and antifungal activity, such as plant defensins. Because of their difference in the nature of the defense strategy, the JA–ET interaction tends to antagonize the SA responses, so that the stress-activated JA–ET signaling might suppress the SA-mediated resistance and vice versa. However, these two pathways might synergistically interact and be considered a fine-tuning mechanism to respond to biotic stresses.

Once the pathogens or microbes have gained access to the plant tissues, they are sensed in each cell by pattern recognition receptors present in the plasma membrane of the host plant cells and bind to microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs;; ), the mechanism designated basal resistance or MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI). To overcome MTI, pathogens secrete effectors into the plant cytosol. In this manner, these proteins interfere with the plant immune responses and modify the host proteins to evade detection and, hence, enhance their virulence, which is referred to as effector-triggered susceptibility. However, the coevolution of plants and microbes has led to the acquisition of the R proteins that specifically recognize these pathogen effectors or avirulence (avr) proteins in a characterized response known as gene-for-gene resistance or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). This specific resistance response is noticeable by localized cell death at the infection site and is known as the hypersensitive response.

SALICYLIC ACID IN BIOTIC STRESSES

During the hypersensitive response, different signal transduction pathways are activated. Tissues distal from the infection site develop an enhanced broad-spectrum resistance to secondary infections that is the systemic acquired resistance (SAR;; ). Before SAR is triggered in remote leaves, SA, which is crucial for this defense strategy, accumulates. When transgenic Arabidopsis plants express the bacterial SA hydroxylase gene nahG that disables the SA accumulation because of its fast turnover to catechol, they cannot develop SAR and induce the pathogen resistance (PR) gene expression. Furthermore, lipid transfer proteins and SA-binding proteins might be involved in the SA accumulation-triggering signaling in SAR. The non-expresser PR1 (NPR1) protein acts downstream of SA and transduces the signal to promote the PR gene expression. During SAR induction, an oxidative burst occurs, followed by an increase in antioxidants to neutralize the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species. This reducing environment can then convert NPR1 from its inactive oligomeric form into its activated monomeric form that can be transported from the cytosol to the nucleus and activate transcription factors, via protein-protein interactions between NPR1 and the TGACG sequence-specific (TGA) transcription factors.

JASMONIC ACID AND ETHYLENE IN BIOTIC STRESSES

The defense response to an attack by necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insects is mediated through the JA pathway that commonly acts together with ET to mount a coordinated defense response. One of the best characterized components of the JA signaling pathway is the coronatine insensitive (COI1) receptor. COI1 is part of the Skp1/Cullin/F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin-ligase protein degradation complex SCFCOI1. High JA levels promote the interaction of the SCFCOI1 complex with the JA ZIM (JAZ) domain repressors and activate the transcription of JA-responsive genes. The coi1 mutants that lack the functional JA receptor are more susceptible to infections by insects and necrotrophic pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea, Pythium irregulare, or Alternaria brassicicola. Likewise, mutations that stabilize the JAZ proteins (JAZ1∆3A) increase the susceptibility against herbivores, such as Spodoptera exigua, further supporting the significance of a functional JA signaling pathway in plant defense responses.

The JA-mediated responses against pathogens is strengthened by the ET activity. Ethylene is perceived in plants by the receptors ethylene resistant1 (ETR1), ETR2, ethylene-insensitive4 (EIN4), ethylene response sensor1 (ERS1), and (ERS2) that belong to a histidine kinase family. Mutations in these receptors not only confer ET insensitivity, but also increase susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. Downstream from these receptors, the Raf-like kinase constitutive triple response 1 (CTR1) is active, which is a negative ET response regulator. In the presence of ET, the CTR1 repression activates EIN2 and, subsequently, stimulates the EIN3/EIL-like (EIL) transcription factors, whereas mutations in EIN2 confer ET insensitivity, in addition to an increased susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens.

Although both JA and ET contribute jointly to the plant’s fight against pathogen attacks, the molecular mechanisms of their crosstalk are not well understood, but new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying their interactions have been provided. The JAZ repressors of the JA signaling interact physically with the EIN3/EIL1 transcription factors and attenuate their ability to activate genes. This interaction has a striking developmental impact, because it enables JA to contribute to the ET response regulation. Thus, besides the classical mechanism in which ET induces the EIN3/EIL1 stabilization, EIN3/EIL1 is released from repression by JA through JAZ degradation, thereby triggering ET responses.

The hormonal interplay between pathways that depend on JA–ET and SA is particularly important when plants are exposed to multiple pathogens of both biotrophic and necrotrophic types. Under such conditions, an effective defense requires only one of these pathways, but still they need to be tightly balanced with each other. This very complex crosstalk between JA and SA has been reviewed thoroughly (see; ).

CYTOKININ AND ITS CROSSTALK WITH SALICYLIC ACID

One of the first indications on the involvement of CK in biotic stress came from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants in which the S-adenosyl-homocysteine hydrolases (SAHHs) were downregulated. Originally, SAHHs have been studied in mammals because of their role in the regulation of transmethylation and mRNA 5′ capping during viral replication. Interestingly, the tobacco plants with low SAHH expression not only exhibited an enhanced resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), cucumber mosaic virus, potato virus X, and potato virus Y, but also increased CK levels and CK-related developmental defects.

In attacked plants, the CK levels are coregulated with the SA levels. Tobacco plants that overexpressed the Ras-related small GTP-binding protein 1 (RGP1)-encoding gene exhibited higher levels of SA and of the acidic pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1a) gene than those of wild-type plants, in correlation with an enhanced resistance against TMV infection. Interestingly, these transgenic plants also showed phenotypes typical for a high endogenous CK activity, such as reduced apical dominance and increased tillering, as was, indeed, confirmed later. Furthermore, in both wild-type and RGP1-overexpressing plants, the CK perception inhibited by the use of the competitive inhibitor 2-chloro-4-cyclohexylamino-6-ethylamino-s-triazine interfered with the expression of the SA-dependent PR-1a and the basic JA-dependent PR-1 after wounding, thereby suggesting that CK contributes to the defense responses mediated by SA and JA.

As mentioned, the recognition of the pathogen Avr effector proteins by the resistance (R) proteins is an important part in plant defense responses. This interaction triggers ETI, which is characterized by the production of SA and the subsequent induction of PR genes and SAR. A dominant-positive mutant of the coiled-coil nucleotide-binding leucine-rich-repeat (CC-NB-LRR) protein UNI (uni-1D) that constitutively activates ETI exhibits an enhanced expression of PR-1, PR-5, and of the type-A ARR CK-signaling repressors and increased endogenous CK levels, with phenotypic alterations typical for high CK activity as a consequence (Figure 2; ). In uni-1D plants, CK levels decreased by the CKX1 induction reduces both the PR-1 and of type-A ARR gene expression. However, in these uni-1D plants, overexpression of the bacterial SA hydroxylase-encoding nahG gene prevents SA accumulation and interferes with the PR-1 expression, but without effect on the type-A ARR gene induction and the CK-like phenotypes. A similar CK-related phenotype has been observed in the knockdown mutant rin4K-D of the resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (RPM1)-interacting protein 4 (RIN4), which is a negative regulator of R proteins. In rin4K-D plants, the R proteins Resistant to P. syringae 2 (RPS2) and RPM1 are constitutively active and trigger ETI, whereas both PR-1 and ARR5 transcript levels are upregulated and the phenotypic alterations are typical for high CK activity (Figure 2; ).

Another indication of the crosstalk between CK and SA has emerged from the characterization of the CRF 5 (Figure 2; ). Indeed, the CRF5 expression is upregulated in response to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) and the transcript levels of SA-induced PR-1, PR-3, PR-4, and PR-5 are increased in the CRF5-overexpressing lines. This crosstalk mechanism between CK and SA has been elucidated by showing that pretreatment of Arabidopsis plants with CK significantly increased the resistance against Pst DC3000 infection. Correspondingly, mutants defective in CK perception and signaling, such as ahk2/ahk3 and arr2, or plants with reduced endogenous CK levels, such as 35S::CKX2 and 35S::CKX4, were more susceptible to Pst DC3000. In contrast, the plant resistance to Pst DC3000 was enhanced by high endogenous CK levels due to overexpression of the CK biosynthesis (IPT) genes or by CK signaling promoted by increased ARR2 expression. Therefore, CK has been proposed to affect priming, a defense-related response activation and might assist plants to cope with infections through the induced SA signaling and increased PR expression levels. This scenario is strongly supported by the findings that ARR2 interacts directly with the SA response factor TGA3, which binds the promoter regions of PR-1 and PR-2, and that this interaction is essential for the enhanced resistance of the 35S::ARR2 lines. Altogether, both the SA-triggered translocation of NPR1 into the nucleus and the formation of a complex with TGA3-ARR2 are seemingly necessary for the development of a full SA-mediated defense response. The impact of CK on the plant defense has been characterized in the Pst DC3000-Arabidopsis interaction model with the SA induction deficient 2 (sid2) mutant that fails to accumulate SA. The increased susceptibility of sid2 toward Pst DC3000 can only be partially recovered by CK treatment, thereby supporting that CK treatments enhance the immunity in an SA-dependent manner.

Recently, the CK-promoted protection against pathogenic infections has been suggested to be involved in SA-independent mechanisms. In the P. syringae pv. tabaci-tobacco interaction model, higher CK levels before infection increase the resistance of tobacco against P. syringae pv. tabaci and this resistance depends on increases phytoalexin levels, such scopoletin and capsidiol, which accumulate in the presence of CK. Thus, the mechanism underlying the CK-mediated resistance of tobacco differs from that in Arabidopsis that is based on an SA-dependent transcriptional control. In the solanaceous plant species, CK appears to promote primary defense responses through an increase of the phytoalexin-pathogen ratio in the early infection phases that then efficiently restricts the pathogen development.

CYTOKININ AND ITS CROSSTALK WITH JASMONIC ACID

Even though there is not much evidence for an interplay between JA and CK, these hormonal pathways might be linked directly and their interaction might be antagonistic. Typically, in wounded plants, the JA levels increase significantly, whereas the SA levels remain unchanged, but both CK applications and high endogenous CK levels accelerate the defense response to reach a faster maximum release of JA and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) than in control plants. In potato (Solanum tuberosum), JA treatments can induce the accumulation of CK ribosides, whereas they might strongly inhibit the CK-induced callus growth. These observations hint at a very complex and unexplored interplay, in which the outcome probably depends not only on the CK-JA ratio, but also that of other hormones as well.

CYTOKININ AND ITS CROSSTALK WITH AUXIN

Crosstalk between CK and auxin has been widely studied over the years, particularly in a developmental context in which their interaction is primarily antagonistic, although a number of recent studies undoubtedly point toward a role of auxin in stress responses. Various pathogens can produce auxins or modulate auxin levels in planta to enhance the plant susceptibility to infection. In Arabidopsis plants lacking the functional RPS2 gene, the expression of the P. syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 decreased the resistance against Pst DC3000, and also show altered auxin levels and auxin-related phenotypes. This direct correlation between sensitivity and auxin levels implies that auxin promotes plant susceptibility. Also, a recent study in which PR1 was used as a marker gene in the Pst DC3000–Arabidopsis interaction revealed that, whereas the immunity was positively promoted by CK and SA, it was negatively regulated by auxin, JA, and ABA. Interestingly, the positive effect of CK pretreatments on the plant immunity can be repressed by a combined CK and auxin treatment. Based on this evidence, CK and auxin might play a highly possible antagonistic role in plant defense responses, but the specific mechanisms that modulate this crosstalk are still unknown.

A model for the CK–auxin interplay in plant defense has been proposed. After infection, pathogens will modulate the auxin levels and the signaling that will diminish the responses mediated by SA and CK, whereas CK pretreatments will prevent the auxin-based susceptibility, due to the known effect of CK on auxin transport and signaling.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Nowadays, one of the major objectives of plant biologists is to improve plant performances under less favorable environmental conditions. By enhancing plant defense responses against biotic and abiotic stress, non-cultivable land might be used, the losses due flooding and infections be decreased, and the amount of applied fertilizers and pesticides in the fields be reduced. However, because the crosstalk between stress-related and developmental hormones is largely unknown, and uncharacterized, usually unforeseen problems occur when the stress resistance is modified. Ideally, plants with enhance resistance to stress or pathogen attacks should not be affected in growth or developmentally hampered. In this context, it is crucial to understand the hormonal crosstalks underlying plant responses to various stresses, because the modification of one single hormonal pathway will very probably alter the activity of other hormonal pathways as well.

The complexity of the impact of hormones on the resistance to stress can be nicely illustrated with examples of plants with altered CK levels. Due to the importance of CK in stress responses, several genes involved in the regulation of CK levels have been proposed as possible targets to enhance stress resistance, such as the IPT and CKX genes. However, the benefit of the stress-tolerant phenotype of the IPT loss-of-functionmutants or of CKX-overexpressing plants was counteracted by developmental defects caused by low bioactive CK levels, such as N6-(∆2-isopentenyl)adenine and trans-zeatin. To overcome this drawback, it is necessary to control the CK activity either in an organ or in a tissue-specific manner, an approach that has already been used in several species. For instance, as a consequence of downregulated CK levels in root tissues only, root length, branching, and biomass increased and the plants were also more resistant to abiotic stress treatments, such as severe drought or heavy metal contaminations. Furthermore, modulation of CK-mediated defense to stress might at the same time attenuate the input provided by other signaling pathways, such as ABA. A reduced CK content leads to a decrease in ABA content and hypersensitivity to ABA treatments, in contrast to the stressed plants in which the ABA levels are upregulated. Correspondingly, overexpresssion of IPT8 results in insensitivity to ABA treatments and prevents the induction of ABI1 and ABI5 in seedlings. These examples clearly show that a good knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the hormone-mediated responses and of the mutual communication among hormonal pathways might be very rewarding in the targeted modulation of specific hormonal pathways and, hence, in the effective plant adaptation to concrete environmental conditions.

Extended studies on the genes that mediate the crosstalk between CK and other developmental and stress-related hormones might identify novel targets for the stress tolerance improvement of crop species. Importantly, the identification of molecular components and mechanisms that mediate the phytohormonal interplay might enable us to dissect the stress-related from the developmental functions.

Finally, to increase the plant resistance against various stresses, new alternative approaches should take in account the specific features of the plant species and the distinct mechanisms that underlay their stress responses. A nice example of such a strategy is the enhanced drought stress tolerance of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) by means of CK-overproducing Sinorhizobium meliloti without impact on nitrogen fixation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 145

  1. 1.

    Adie B. A. T. Pérez-Pérez J. Pérez-Pérez M. M. Godoy M. Sánchez-Serrano J.-J. Schmelz E. A. (2007 ). ABA is an essential signal for plant resistance to pathogens affecting JA biosynthesis and the activation of defenses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19 1665–1681

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.048041

  2. 2.

    Alonso J. M. Stepanova A. N. (2004 ). The ethylene signaling pathway. Science 306 1513–1515

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1104812

  3. 3.

    An C. Mou Z. (2011 ). Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53 412–428

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01043.x

  4. 4.

    Andi S. Taguchi F. Toyoda K. Shiraishi T. Ichinose Y. (2001 ). Effect of methyl jasmonate on harpin-induced hypersensitive cell death, generation of hydrogen peroxide and expression of PAL mRNA in tobacco suspension cultured BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 42 446–449

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pce056

  5. 5.

    Balbi V. Devoto A. (2008 ). Jasmonate signalling network in Arabidopsis thaliana: crucial regulatory nodes and new physiological scenarios. New Phytol. 177 301–318

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02292.x

  6. 6.

    Beckers G. J. M. Spoel S. H. (2006 ). Fine-tuning plant defence signalling: salicylate versus jasmonate. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 8 1–10

    Not in our library10.1055/s-2005-872705

  7. 7.

    Beguerisse-Dïaz M. Hernández-Gómez M. C. Lizzul A. M. Barahona M. Desikan R. (2012 ). Compound stress response in stomatal closure: a mathematical model of ABA and ethylene interaction in guard cells. BMC Syst. Biol. 6:146

    Not in our library10.1186/1752-0509-6-146

  8. 8.

    Bishopp A. Benková E. Helariutta Y. (2011 ). Sending mixed messages: auxin-cytokinin crosstalk in roots. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 10–16

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2010.08.014

  9. 9.

    Bleecker A. B. Estelle M. A. Somerville C. Kende H. (1988 ). Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241 1086–1089

    Not in our library10.1126/science.241.4869.1086

  10. 10.

    Brinkman R. (1980 ). “Saline and sodic soils,” in Land Reclamation and Water Management: Developments, Problems, and Challenges, ILRI Publication No. 27 (Wageningen: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement) 62–68

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Broekaert W. F. Delauré S. L. De Bolle M. F. C Cammue B. P. A. (2006 ). The role of ethylene in host-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 44 393–416

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143440

  12. 12.

    Burke E. J. Brown S. J. Christidis N. (2006 ). Modeling the recent evolution of global drought and projections for the twenty-first century with the Hadley Centre climate model. J. Hydrometeorol. 7 1113–1125

    Not in our library10.1175/jhm544.1

  13. 13.

    Cary A. J. Liu W. Howell S. H. (1995 ). Cytokinin action is coupled to ethylene in its effects on the inhibition of root and hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Physiol. 107 1075–1082

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.107.4.1075

  14. 14.

    Chae H. S. Faure F. Kieber J. J. (2003 ). The eto1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokinin treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by increasing the stability of ACS protein. Plant Cell 15 545–559

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.006882

  15. 15.

    Chang C. Kwok S. F. Bleecker A. B. Meyerowitz E. M. (1993 ). Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science 262 539–544

    Not in our library10.1126/science.8211181

  16. 16.

    Chao Q. Rothenberg M. Solano R. Roman G. Terzaghi W. Ecker J. R. (1997 ). Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein ethylene-insensitive3 and related proteins. Cell 89 1133–1144

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80300-1

  17. 17.

    Chen Z. Agnew J. L. Cohen J. D. He P. Shan L. Sheen J. (2007 ). Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 alters Arabidopsis thaliana auxin physiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 20131–20136

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0704901104

  18. 18.

    Chisholm S. T. Coaker G. Day B. Staskawicz B. J. (2006 ). Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124 803–814

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008

  19. 19.

    Choi J. Choi D. Lee S. Ryu C.-M. Hwang I. (2011 ). Cytokinins and plant immunity: old foes or new frieds? Trends Plant Sci. 16 388–394

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.003

  20. 20.

    Choi J. Huh S. U. Kojima M. Sakakibara H. Paek K.-H. Hwang I. (2010 ). The cytokinin-activated transcription factor ARR2 promotes plant immunity via TGA3/NPR1-dependent salicylic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 19 284–295

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.011

  21. 21.

    Chung H. S. Koo A. J. K. Gao X. Jayanty S. Thines B. Jones A. D. (2008 ). Regulation and function of Arabidopsis JASMONATE ZIM-domain genes in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol. 146 952–964

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.107.115691

  22. 22.

    Cui J. Bahrami A. K. Pringle E. G. Hernandez-Guzman G. Bender C. L. Pierce N. E. (2005 ). Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 1791–1796

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0409450102

  23. 23.

    Cutcliffe J. W. Hellmann E. Heyl A. Rashotte A. M. (2011 ). CRFs form protein-protein interactions with each other and with members of the cytokinin signalling pathway in Arabidopsis via the CRF domain. J. Exp. Bot. 62 4995–5002

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/err199

  24. 24.

    Cutler S. R. Rodriguez P. L. Finkelstein R. R. Abrams S. R. (2010 ). Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61 651–679

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122

  25. 25.

    Dangl J. L Jones J. D. G. (2001 ). Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411 826–833

    Not in our library10.1038/35081161

  26. 26.

    Davies W. J. Kudoyarova G. Hartung W. (2005 ). Long-distance ABA signaling and its relation to other signaling pathways in the detection of soil drying and the mediation of the plant’s response to drought. J. Plant Growth Regul. 24 285–295

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-005-0103-1

  27. 27.

    De Clercq E. (1998 ). Carbocyclic adenosine analogues as S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors and antiviral agents: recent advances. Nucleosides Nucleotides 17 625–634

    Not in our library10.1080/07328319808005205

  28. 28.

    Debnath M. Pandey M. Bisen P. S. (2011 ). An omics approach to understand the plant abiotic stress. OMICS 15 739–762

    Not in our library10.1089/omi.2010.0146

  29. 29.

    Delaney T. P. Uknes S. Vernooij B. Friedrich L. Weymann K. Negrotto D. (1994 ). A central role of salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Science 266 1247–1250

    Not in our library10.1126/science.266.5188.1247

  30. 30.

    Dermastia M. Ravnikar M. Vilhar B Kovač M. (1994 ). Increased level of cytokinin ribosides in jasmonic acid-treated potato (Solanum tuberosum) stem node cultures. Physiol. Plant. 92 241–246

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb05332.x

  31. 31.

    Dervinis C. Frost C. J. Lawrence S. D. Novak N. G. Davis J. M. (2010 ). Cytokinin primes plant responses to wounding and reduces insect performance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 29 289–296

    Not in our library10.1007/s00344-009-9135-2

  32. 32.

    Devoto A. Nieto-Rostro M. Xie D. Ellis C. Harmston R. Patrick E. (2002 ). COI1 links jasmonate signalling and fertility to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 32 457–466

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01432.x

  33. 33.

    Dietz K.-J. Vogel M. O. Viehhauser A. (2010 ). AP2/EREBP transcription factors are part of gene regulatory networks and integrate metabolic, hormonal and environmental signals in stress acclimation and retrograde signalling. Protoplasma 245 3–14

    Not in our library10.1007/s00709-010-0142-8

  34. 34.

    Doares S. H. Narváez-Vásquez J. Conconi A. Ryan C. A. (1995 ). Salicylic acid inhibits synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in tomato leaves induced by systemin and jasmonic acid. Plant Physiol. 108 1741–1746

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.4.1741

  35. 35.

    Durrant W. E. Dong X. (2004 ). Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42 185–209

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421

  36. 36.

    Ferrari S. Galletti R. Denoux C. De Lorenzo G. Ausubel F. M. Dewdney J. (2007 ). Resistance to Botrytis cinerea induced in Arabidopsis by elicitors is independent of salicylic acid, ethylene, or jasmonate signaling but requires PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT3. Plant Physiol. 144 367–379

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.107.095596

  37. 37.

    Feys B. J. Parker J. E. (2000 ). Interplay of signaling pathways in plant disease resistance. Trends Genet. 16 449–455

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02107-7

  38. 38.

    Finkelstein R. R. Gampala S. S. L. Rock C. D. (2002 ). Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 14 S15-S45

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.010441

  39. 39.

    Flor H. H. (1971 ). Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9 275–296

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.py.09.090171.001423

  40. 40.

    Fonseca S. Chico J. M. Solano R. (2009 ). The jasmonate pathway: the ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12 539–547

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.013

  41. 41.

    Fujii H. Zhu J.-K. (2009 ). Arabidopsis mutant deficient in 3 abscisic acid-activated protein kinases reveals critical roles in growth, reproduction, and stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 8380–8385

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0903144106

  42. 42.

    Fujita Y. Fujita M. Shinozaki K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2011 ). ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 124 509–525

    Not in our library10.1007/s10265-011-0412-3

  43. 43.

    Gaffney T. Friedrich L. Vernooij B. Negrotto D. Nye G. Uknes S. (1993 ). Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261 754–756

    Not in our library10.1126/science.261.5122.754

  44. 44.

    Geraats B. P. J. Bakker P. A. H. M. Lawrence C. B. Achuo E. A. Höfte M van Loon L. C. (2003 ). Ethylene-insensitive tobacco shows differentially altered susceptibility to different pathogens. Phytopathology 93 813–821

    Not in our library10.1094/phyto.2003.93.7.813

  45. 45.

    Gfeller A. Liechti R. Farmer E. E. (2010 ). Arabidopsis jasmonate signaling pathway. Sci. Signal. 3 cm4

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.3109cm4

  46. 46.

    Ghanem M. E. Albacete A. Smigocki A. C. Frébort I. PospïŠilová H. Martïnez-Andújar C. (2011 ). Root-synthesized cytokinins improve shoot growth and fruit yield in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. J. Exp. Bot. 62 125–140

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erq266

  47. 47.

    Goda H. Sasaki E. Akiyama K. Maruyama-Nakashita A. Nakabayashi K. Li W. (2008 ). The AtGenExpress hormone and chemical treatment data set: experimental design, data evaluation, model data analysis and data access. Plant J. 55 526–542

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03510.x

  48. 48.

    Gómez-Gómez L. (2004 ). Plant perception systems for pathogen recognition and defence. Mol. Immunol. 41 1055–1062

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.008

  49. 49.

    Gonzalez-Guzman M. Pizzio G. A. Antoni R. Vera-Sirera F. Merilo E. Bassel G. W. (2012 ). Arabidopsis PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors play a major role in quantitative regulation of stomatal aperture and transcriptional response to abscisic acid. Plant Cell 24 2483–2496

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.098574

  50. 50.

    Greenberg J. T. Yao N. (2004 ). The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant – pathogen interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 6 201–211

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00361.x

  51. 51.

    Großkinsky D. K. Naseem M. Abdelmohsen U. R. Plickert N. Engelke T. Griebel T. (2011 ). Cytokinins mediate resistance against Pseudomonas syringae in tobacco through increased antimicrobial phytoalexin synthesis independent of salicylic acid signaling. Plant Physiol. 157 815–830

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.182931

  52. 52.

    Guo H. Ecker J. R. (2003 ). Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCFEBF1/EBF2-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 115 667–677

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3

  53. 53.

    Guzmá n,P. Ecker J. R. (1990 ). Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2 513–523

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.2.6.513

  54. 54.

    Hammond-Kosack K. E Jones J. D. G. (1996 ). Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 8 1773–1791

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.8.10.1773

  55. 55.

    Hansen H Dörffling K. (2003 ). Root-derived trans-zeatin riboside and abscisic acid in drought-stressed and rewatered sunflower plants: interaction in the control of leaf diffusive resistance? Funct. Plant Biol. 30 365–375

    Not in our library10.1071/fp02223

  56. 56.

    Hansen M. Chae H. S. Kieber J. J. (2009 ). Regulation of ACS protein stability by cytokinin and brassinosteroid. Plant J. 57 606–614

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03711.x

  57. 57.

    Hirayama T. Shinozaki K. (2010 ). Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 61 1041–1052

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04124.x

  58. 58.

    Hua J. Chang C. Sun Q. Meyerowitz E. M. (1995 ). Ethylene insensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science 269 1712–1714

    Not in our library10.1126/science.7569898

  59. 59.

    Hua J. Sakai H. Nourizadeh S. Chen Q. G. Bleecker A. B. Ecker J. R. (1998 ). EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10 1321–1332

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.10.8.1321

  60. 60.

    Hutchison C. E. Li J. Argueso C. Gonzalez M. Lee E. Lewis M. W. (2006 ). The Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer proteins are redundant positive regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 18 3073–3087

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.045674

  61. 61.

    Hwang I. Sheen J. (2001 ). Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature 413 383–389

    Not in our library10.1038/35096500

  62. 62.

    Hwang I. Sheen J Müller B. (2012 ). Cytokinin signaling networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63 353–380

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105503

  63. 63.

    Igari K. Endo S. Hibara K.-I. Aida M. Sakakibara H. Kawasaki T. (2008 ). Constitutive activation of a CC-NB-LRR protein alters morphogenesis through the cytokinin pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 55 14–27

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03466.x

  64. 64.

    Jeon J. Kim J. (2013 ). Arabidopsis response regulator1 and Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer protein2 (AHP2), AHP3, and AHP5 function in cold signaling. Plant Physiol. 161 408–424

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.207621

  65. 65.

    Jeon J. Kim N. Y. Kim S. Kang N. Y. Novák O. Ku S.-J. (2010 ). A subset of cytokinin two-component signaling system plays a role in cold temperature stress response in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 285 23371–23386

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.096644

  66. 66.

    Jones J. D. G. Dangl J. L. (2006 ). The plant immune system. Nature 444 323–329

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05286

  67. 67.

    Kamada I. Yamauchi S. Youssefian S. Sano H. (1992 ). Transgenic tobacco plants expressing rpg1, a gene encoding a ras-related GTP-binding protein from rice, show distinct morphological characteristics. Plant J. 2 799–807

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.1992.tb00149.x

  68. 68.

    Kang N. Y. Cho C. Kim N. Y. Kim J. (2012 ). Cytokinin receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pathways in the dehydration response of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 169 1382–1391

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2012.05.007

  69. 69.

    Kanzaki H. Saitoh H. Ito A. Fujisawa S. Kamoun S. Katou S. (2003 ). Cytosolic HSP90 and HSP70 are essential components of INF1-mediated hypersensitive response and non-host resistance to Pseudomonas cichorii in Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4 383–391

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00186.x

  70. 70.

    Kieber J. J. Rothenberg M. Roman G. Feldmann K. A. Ecker J. R. (1993 ). CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinases. Cell 72 427–441

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(93)90119-b

  71. 71.

    Kilian J. Whitehead D. Horak J. Wanke D. Weinl S. Batistic O. (2007 ). The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 50 347–363

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03052.x

  72. 72.

    Kloek A. P. Verbsky M. L. Sharma S. B. Schoelz J. E. Vogel J. Klessig D. F. (2001 ). Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine-insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms. Plant J. 26 509–522

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01050.x

  73. 73.

    Kudoyarova G. R. Vysotskaya L. B. Cherkozyanova A. Dodd I. C. (2007 ). Effect of partial rootzone drying on the concentration of zeatin-type cytokinins in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) xylem sap and leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 58 161–168

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erl116

  74. 74.

    Kushwah S. Jones A. M. Laxmi A. (2011 ). Cytokinin interplay with ethylene, auxin, and glucose signaling controls Arabidopsis seedling root directional growth. Plant Physiol. 156 1851–1866

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.175794

  75. 75.

    Lehotai N. Kolbert Z. Petó A. Feigl G. Ördög A. Kumar D. (2012 ). Selenite-induced hormonal and signalling mechanisms during root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana L. J. Exp. Bot. 63 5677–5687

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ers222

  76. 76.

    Liang Y. S. Ermawati N. Cha J.-Y. Jung M. H. Su’udi M. Kim M. G. (2010 ). Overexpression of an AP2/ERF-type transcription factor CRF5 confers pathogen resistance to Arabidopsis plants. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 53 142–148

    Not in our library10.3839/jksabc.2010.024

  77. 77.

    Ma Y. Szostkiewicz I. Korte A. Moes D. Yang Y. Christmann A. (2009 ). Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 324 1064–1068

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1172408

  78. 78.

    Malamy J. Carr J. P. Klessig D. F. Raskin I. (1990 ). Salicylic acid: a likely endogenous signal in the resistance response of tobacco to viral infection. Science 250 1002–1004

    Not in our library10.1126/science.250.4983.1002

  79. 79.

    Mason M. G. Jha D. Salt D. E. Tester M. Hill K. Kieber J. J. (2010 ). Type-B response regulators ARR1 and ARR12 regulate expression of AtHKT1;1 and accumulation of sodium in Arabidopsis shoots. Plant J. 64 753–763

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04366.x

  80. 80.

    Masuta C. Tanaka H. Uehara K. Kuwata S. Koiwai A. Noma M. (1995 ). Broad resistance to plant viruses in transgenic plants conferred by antisense inhibition of a host gene essential in S-adenosylmethionine-dependent transmethylation reactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 6117–6121

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.13.6117

  81. 81.

    McCabe M. S. Garratt L. C. Schepers F. Jordi W. J. R. M. Stoopen G. M. Davelaar E. (2001 ). Effects of PSAG12-IPT gene expression on development and senescence in transgenic lettuce. Plant Physiol. 127 505–516

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.010244

  82. 82.

    Mou Z. Fan W. Dong X. (2003 ). Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell 113 935–944

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00429-x

  83. 83.

    Mur L. A. J. Kenton P. Atzorn R. Miersch O. Wasternack C. (2006 ). The outcomes of concentration-specific interactions between salicylate and jasmonate signaling include synergy, antagonism, and oxidative stress leading to cell death. Plant Physiol. 140 249–262

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.105.072348

  84. 84.

    Naik G. R. Mukherjee I. Reid D. M. (2002 ). Influence of cytokinins on the methyl jasmonate-promoted senescence in Helianthus annuus cotyledons. Plant Growth Regul. 38 61–68

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1020926902352

  85. 85.

    Naseem M. Dandekar T. (2012 ). The role of auxin-cytokinin antagonism in plant-pathogen interactions. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1003026

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1003026

  86. 86.

    Naseem M. Philippi N. Hussain A. Wangorsch G. Ahmed N. Dandekar T. (2012 ). Integrated systems view on networking by hormones in Arabidopsis immunity reveals multiple crosstalk for cytokinin. Plant Cell 24 1793–1814

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.098335

  87. 87.

    Nemhauser J. L. Hong F. Chory J. (2006 ). Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell 126 467–475

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.050

  88. 88.

    Nishimura M. T. Dangl J. L. (2010 ). Arabidopsis and the plant immune system. Plant J. 61 1053–1066

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04131.x

  89. 89.
    PYR/PYL/RCAR family members are major in‐vivo ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C‐interacting proteins in Arabidopsis · 2010
    No notice
  90. 90.

    Nishimura N. Yoshida T. Kitahata N. Asami T. Shinozaki K. Hirayama T. (2007 ). ABA-hypersensitive germination1 encodes a protein phosphatase 2C, an essential component of abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis seed. Plant J. 50 935–949

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03107.x

  91. 91.

    Nishiyama R. Watanabe Y. Leyva-Gonzalez M. A. Ha C. V. Fujita Y. Tanaka M. (2013 ). Arabidopsis AHP2, AHP3, and AHP5 histidine phosphotransfer proteins function as redundant negative regulators of drought stress response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 4840–4845

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1302265110

  92. 92.

    Nishiyama R. Watanabe Y. Fujita Y. Le D. T. Kojima M. Werner T. (2011 ). Analysis of cytokinin mutants and regulation of cytokinin metabolic genes reveals important regulatory roles of cytokinins in drought, salt and abscisic acid responses, and abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 23 2169–2183

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.111.087395

  93. 93.

    Overmyer K. Tuominen H. Kettunen R. Betz C. Langebartels C. Sandermann H.Jr. (2000 ). Ozone-sensitive Arabidopsis rcd1 mutant reveals opposite roles for ethylene and jasmonate signaling pathways in regulating superoxide-dependent cell death. Plant Cell 12 1849–1862

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.12.10.1849

  94. 94.

    Park S.-W. Kaimoyo E. Kumar D. Mosher S. Klessig D. F. (2007 ). Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science 318 113–116 [Erratum Science 321, 342]

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1147113

  95. 95.

    Park S.-Y. Fung P. Nishimura N. Jensen D. R. Fujii H. Zhao Y. (2009 ). Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324 1068–1071

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1173041

  96. 96.

    Peña-Cortés H. Albrecht T. Prat S. Weiler E. W. Willmitzer L. (1993 ). Aspirin prevents wound-induced gene expression in tomato leaves by blocking jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Planta 191 123–128

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    Petersen M. Brodersen P. Naested H. Andreasson E. Lindhart U. Johansen B. (2000 ). Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 103 1111–1120

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00213-0

  98. 98.

    Potuschak T. Lechner E. Parmentier Y. Yanagisawa S. Grava S. Koncz C. (2003 ). EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two Arabidopsis F bos proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell 115 679–689

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00968-1

  99. 99.

    Qin H. Gu Q. Zhang J. Sun L. Kuppu S. Zhang Y. (2011 ). Regulated expression of an isopentenyltransferase gene (IPT) in peanut significantly improves drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 52 1904–1914

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pbr125

  100. 100.

    Rabbani M. A. Maruyama K. Abe H. Khan M. A. Katsura K. Ito Y. (2003 ). Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA get-blot analyses. Plant Physiol. 133 1755–1767

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.103.025742

  101. 101.

    Raghavendra A. S. Gonugunta V. K. Christmann A. Grill E. (2010 ). ABA perception and signalling. Trends Plant Sci. 15 395–401

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.006

  102. 102.

    Rashotte A. M. Mason M. G. Hutchison C. E. Ferreira F. J. Schaller G. E. Kieber J. J. (2006 ). A subset of Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factors mediates cytokinin responses in concert with a two-component pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 11081–11085

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0602038103

  103. 103.

    Robert-Seilaniantz A. Navarro L. Bari R Jones J. D. G. (2007 ). Pathological hormone imbalances. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 372–379

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2007.06.003

  104. 104.

    Ross A. F. (1961 ). Localized acquired resistance to plant virus infection in hypersensitive hosts. Virology 14 329–339

    Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(61)90318-x

  105. 105.

    Růžička K. Ljung K. Vanneste S. Podhorská R. Beeckman T. Friml J. (2007 ). Ethylene regulates root growth through effects on auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent auxin distribution. Plant Cell 19 2197–2212

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.107.052126

  106. 106.
    ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis · 1998
    Not checked
  107. 107.

    Sano H. Seo S. Orudgev E. Youssefian S. Ishizuka K. Ohashi Y. (1994 ). Expression of the gene for a small GTP binding protein in transgenic tobacco elevates endogenous cytokinin levels, abnormally induces salicylic acid in response to wounding, and increases resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 10556–10560

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.22.10556

  108. 108.

    Sano H. Seo S. Koizumi N. Niki T. Iwamura H. Ohashi Y. (1996 ). Regulation of cytokinins of endogenous levels of jasmonic and salicylic acids in mechanically wounded tobacco plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 37 762–769doi.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029011

  109. 109.

    Santiago J. Dupeux F. Round A. Antoni R. Park S.-Y. Jamin M. (2009a ). The abscisic acid receptor PYR1 in complex with abscisic acid. Nature 462 665–668

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08591

  110. 110.

    Santiago J. Rodrigues A. Saez A. Rubio S. Antoni R. Dupeux F. (2009b ). Modulation of drought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A PP2Cs. Plant J. 60 575–588

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03981.x

  111. 111.

    Schachtman D. P Goodger J. Q. D. (2008 ). Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought. Trends Plant Sci. 13 281–287

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.003

  112. 112.

    Seki M. Narusaka M. Ishida J. Nanjo T. Fujita M. Oono Y. (2002 ). Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 31 279–292

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01359.x

  113. 113.

    Shi Y. Tian S. Hou L. Huang X. Zhang X. Guo H. (2012 ). Ethylene signaling negatively regulates freezing tolerance by repressing expression of CBF and type-A ARR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 2578–2595

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.098640

  114. 114.

    Shkolnik-Inbar D. Bar-Zvi D. (2010 ). ABI4 mediates abscisic acid and cytokinin inhibition of lateral root formation by reducing polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22 3560–3573

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.110.074641

  115. 115.

    Sreenivasulu N. Sopory S. K Kavi Kishor P. B. (2007 ). Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388 1–13

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2006.10.009

  116. 116.

    Stoll M. Loveys B. Dry P. (2000 ). Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 51 1627–1634

    Not in our library10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1627

  117. 117.

    Stoynova-Bakalova E. Petrov P. I. Gigova L. Baskin T. I. (2008 ). Differential effects of methyl jasmonate on growth and division of etiolated zucchini cotyledons. Plant Biol. 10 476–484

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00034.x

  118. 118.

    Sý’ykorová B. Kurešová G. Daskalova S. Trčková M. Hoyerová K. Raimanová I. (2008 ). Senescence-induced ectopic expression of the A.tumefaciensipt gene in wheat delays leaf senescence, increases cytokinin content, nitrate influx, and nitrate reductase activity, but does not affect grain yield J. Exp. Bot. 59 377–387

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erm319

  119. 119.

    Szostkiewicz I. Richter K. Kepka M. Demmel S. Ma Y. Korte A. (2010 ). Closely related receptor complexes differ in their ABA selectivity and sensitivity. Plant J. 61 25–35

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04025.x

  120. 120.

    Thaler J. S. Humphrey P. T. Whiteman N. K. (2012 ). Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci. 17 260–270

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.010

  121. 121.

    To J. P. C. Kieber J. J. (2008 ). Cytokinin signaling: two-components and more. Trends Plant Sci. 13 85–92

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.005

  122. 122.

    Tran L.-S. P. Urao T. Qin F. Maruyama K. Kakimoto T. Shinozaki K. (2007 ). Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 20623–20628

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0706547105

  123. 123.

    Truman W. Bennettt M. H. Kubigsteltig I. Turnbull C. Grant M. (2007 ). Arabidopsis systemic immunity uses conserved defense signaling pathways and is mediated by jasmonates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 1075–1080

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0605423104

  124. 124.

    Ueda J. Kato J. (1982 ). Inhibition of cytokinin-induced plant growth by jasmonic acid and its methyl ester. Physiol. Plant. 54 249–252

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb00255.x

  125. 125.

    Umezawa T. Sugiyama N. Mizoguchi M. Hayashi S. Myouga F. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2009 ). Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 17588–17593

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907095106

  126. 126.

    Urao T. Yakubov B. Satoh R. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Seki M. Hirayama T. (1999 ). A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell 11 1743–1754

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.11.9.1743

  127. 127.

    van Wees S. C. M. Chang H.-S. Zhu T. Glazebrook J. (2003 ). Characterization of the early response of Arabidopsis to Alternaria brassicicola infection using expression profiling. Plant Physiol. 132 606–617

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.103.022186

  128. 128.

    Vanstraelen M Benková E. (2012 ). Hormonal interactions in the regulation of plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28 463–487

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155741

  129. 129.

    Vlad F. Rubio S. Rodrigues A. Sirichandra C. Belin C. Robert N. (2009 ). Protein phosphatases 2C regulate the activation of the Snf1-related kinase OST1 by abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 3170–3184

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.109.069179

  130. 130.

    Vogel J. P. Woeste K. E. Theologis A. Kieber J. J. (1998 ). Recessive and dominant mutations in the ethylene biosynthetic gene ACS5 of Arabidopsis confer cytokinin insensitivity and ethylene overproduction, respectively. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 4766–4771

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.8.4766

  131. 131.
    Auxin Response Factor2 (ARF2) and Its Regulated Homeodomain Gene HB33 Mediate Abscisic Acid Response in Arabidopsis · 2011
    No notice
  132. 132.

    Wang Y. Li L. Ye T. Zhao S. Liu Z. Feng Y.-Q. (2011b ). Cytokinin antagonizes ABA suppression to seed germination of Arabidopsis by downregulating ABI5 expression. Plant J. 68 249–261

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04683.x

  133. 133.

    Werner T. Nehnevajova E. Köllmer I. Nová k. O. Strnad M. Krämer U. (2010 ). Root-specific reduction of cytokinin causes enhanced root growth, drought tolerance, and leaf mineral enrichment in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 22 3905–3920

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.109.072694

  134. 134.

    Wind J. J. Peviani A. Snel B. Hanson J. Smeekens S. C. (2013 ). ABI4: versatile activator and repressor. Trends Plant Sci. 18 125–132

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2012.10.004

  135. 135.

    Xu J. Li X.-L. Luo L. (2012 ). Effects of engineered Sinorhizobium meliloti on cytokinin synthesis and tolerance of alfalfa to extreme drought stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 8056–8061

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01276-12

  136. 136.

    Xu L. Liu F. Lechner E. Genschik P. Crosby W. L. Ma H. (2002 ). The SCFCOI1 ubiquitin-ligase complexes are required for jasmonate response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14 1919–1935

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.003368

  137. 137.

    Yarwood C. E. (1960 ). Topical susceptibility of plants to viruses. Virology 12 245–257

    Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(60)90198-7

  138. 138.

    Ye M. Luo S. M. Xie J. F. Li Y. F. Xu T. Liu Y. (2012 ). Silencing COI1 in rice increases susceptibility to chewing insects and impairs inducible defense. PLoS ONE 7:e36214

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0036214

  139. 139.

    Žd’árská M. Zatloukalová P. Benïtez M. Šedo O. Potěšil D. Novák O. (2013 ). Proteome analysis in Arabidopsis reveals shoot- and root-specific targets of cytokinin action and differential regulation of hormonal homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 161 918–930

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.202853

  140. 140.

    Zeller G. Henz S. R. Widmer C. K. Sachsenberg T. Rätsch G. Weigel D. (2009 ). Stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome analyzed using whole-genome tiling arrays. Plant J. 58 1068–1082

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03835.x

  141. 141.

    Zhai Y. Wang Y. Li Y. Lei T. Yan F. Su L. (2013 ). Isolation and molecular characterization of GmERF7, a soybean ethylene-response factor that increases salt stress tolerance in tobacco. Gene 513 174–183

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.018

  142. 142.

    Zhang Y. Fan W. Kinkema M. Li X. Dong X. (1999 ). Interaction of NPR1 with basic leucine zipper protein transcription factors that bind sequences required for salicylic acid induction of the PR-1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 6523–6528

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.11.6523

  143. 143.

    Zhu Z. An F. Feng Y. Li P. Xue L. A. M. (2011 ). Derepression of ethylene-stabilized transcription factors (EIN3/EIL1) mediates jasmonate and ethylene signaling synergy in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 12539–12544

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1103959108

  144. 144.

    Zipfel C. Kunze G. Chinchilla D. Caniard A. Jones J. D. G. Boller T. (2006 ). Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125 749–760

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.037

  145. 145.

    Zwack P. J. Robinson B. R. Risley M. G. Rashotte A. M. (2013 ). Cytokinin response factor 6 negatively regulates leaf senescence and is induced in response to cytokinin and numerous abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Physiol. 54 971–981

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pct049

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.