No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens
Koste A. Yadeta, Bart P. H. J. Thomma
Frontiers in Plant Science · 2013
Abstract
Vascular wilts are among the most destructive plant diseases that occur in annual crops as well as in woody perennials. These diseases are generally caused by soil-borne bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes that infect through the roots and enter the water-conducting xylem vessels where they proliferate and obstruct the transportation of water and minerals. As a consequence, leaves wilt and die, which may lead to impairment of the whole plant and eventually to death of the plant. Cultural, chemical, and biological measures to control this group of plant pathogens are generally ineffective, and the most effective control strategy is the use of genetic resistance. Owing to the fact that vascular wilt pathogens live deep in the interior of their host plants, studies into the biology of vascular pathogens are complicated. However, to design novel strategies to combat vascular wilt diseases, understanding the (molecular) biology of vascular pathogens and the molecular mechanisms underlying plant defense against these pathogens is crucial. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on interactions of vascular wilt pathogens with their host plants, with emphasis on host defense responses against this group of pathogens.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
Plants are continuously confronted with potential pests and pathogens that include insects, nematodes, viruses, bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. While many of these organisms evolved to infect aerial plant parts, such as leaves, stems, flowers, and fruits, others target below-ground organs, such as roots and tubers. Specific pathogens target the vascular system that is composed of xylem vessels, tracheary elements that transport water and minerals that are absorbed by the roots to the photosynthetic organs, and phloem elements, the living tissue that transports organic photosynthesis products. Paradoxically, although the phloem is rich in sugars, most vascular pathogens colonize the nutrient-poor xylem vessels. This may be explained by the accessibility of both types of vessel elements, as the phloem is characterized by living cells with a high osmotic pressure which makes penetration difficult, while the xylem is composed of dead tracheary elements with relatively low osmotic pressure. Consequently, phloem pathogens comprise rickettsias, spiroplasmas, and phytoplasmas that are introduced by vectors such as phloem feeding insects, or by cultural practices like grafting.
Xylem-invading pathogens comprise bacterial, fungal, and oomycete microorganisms that cause vascular wilt diseases. Vascular wilt pathogens are among the most destructive plant pathogens that can wipe out entire crops. Vascular wilt diseases occur worldwide and affect annual crops as well as woody perennials, thus not only impacting food and feed production, but also natural ecosystems. Most of the symptoms caused by vascular wilt pathogens develop in acropetal direction: from bottom to top. Epinasty is the primary disease symptom, followed by flaccidity, chlorosis, vascular browning, and necrostress tolerance when compared with non-stress tolerance when compared with non-sis of the terminal leaflets. A large range of symptoms is caused by vascular wilt pathogens, and the same pathogen may cause different symptoms on different host plants. Depending on the pathogen species and the host, plants may become stunted, wilt partially or completely, and ultimately die. Plant death may occur within days to weeks or, in case of perennials, months to years. Age, fitness, and the nutritional status of the host, environmental conditions, and virulence of the pathogen can all determine the speed and severity at which symptoms develop. In all cases where it is observed, wilting symptoms represent a transitory phase of the disease.
Vascular wilt pathogens generally overwinter in soil, plant debris, watercourses, or in insect vectors. While most vascular wilt pathogens are soil-borne and enter their hosts through the roots by penetration via wounds or cracks that appear at the sites of lateral root formation, some enter leaves via natural openings such as stomata and hydathodes, such as the bacterial leaf blight pathogen of rice, Xanthomonas oryzae. Furthermore, some vascular wilt pathogens are delivered directly into the xylem by insect vectors that feed on xylem sap, such as Xylella fastidiosa bacteria that are transmitted by leafhoppers, or by chewing insects, such as Ophiostoma fungi that are transmitted by bark beetles. Regardless of the mechanism used by vascular wilt pathogens to enter their hosts, they subsequently colonize the xylem vessels where they proliferate.
CONTROL OF VASCULAR WILT DISEASES
Controlling vascular wilt pathogens is difficult for several reasons. First of all, no efficient treatments exist to cure infected plants, and growers generally have to remove them from their crops. Secondly, many vascular wilt pathogens are soil-borne and produce persistent resting structures that are able to survive for long periods of time in the absence of host plants. Thirdly, some of these pathogens can infect a broad range of host plants and as a consequence, cultural control measures such as crop rotation are generally not very effective. Resting structures are desirable targets for control by soil solarization and chemical fumigation. However, limitations in large-scale applicability and ban on chemical fumigants because of public health and environmental issues render these approaches unsuitable. Biological agents and organic soil amendments are used to control vascular wilt diseases. For instance, injection of the Dutch trig, a bio-control vaccine that contains conidia of a non-pathogenic strain of the vascular wilt fungus Verticillium albo-atrum isolate, into elm trees is used to induce the natural defense against Dutch elm disease caused by the fungi O. ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. However, since biological agents are often affected by biotic and abiotic factors, performance of bio-control microorganisms in the field is often inconsistent.
The most effective strategy to control vascular wilt diseases thus far is the use of genetic resistance in host plants. Due to the fact that vascular wilt pathogens live deep in the interior of their host plants, studies into the biology of vascular pathogens is complicated. However, their high economic impact, combined with the absence of curative treatments, justifies increased attention. The recent availability of a number of genome sequences of vascular pathogens has inspired novel research efforts to unravel the molecular basis of vascular wilt diseases (Table 1). To design novel strategies to combat vascular wilt diseases, understanding the (molecular) biology of vascular pathogens and the molecular mechanisms underlying plant defense against these pathogens is crucial.
FUNGAL VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
There are four fungal genera containing the major vascular wilt pathogens: Ceratocystis (vascular wilts of oak, cocoa, and eucalyptus), Ophiostoma (vascular wilts of elm trees), Verticillium (broad host range), and Fusarium (broad host range;;;;;; ). In contrast to the other three genera, the vast majority of Fusarium vascular wilt pathogens all belong to a single species, F. oxysporum, which contains morphologically indistinguishable pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains. The pathogenic strains cause vascular wilts or root rot in over 100 different host species. Despite the broad host range of these species, individual strains typically infect only a single or a few hosts and are assigned to formae speciales. Interestingly, it was experimentally demonstrated that the transfer of two lineage specific (LS) chromosomes from a tomato pathogenic F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici strain to a non-pathogenic strain converted the latter into a tomato pathogen, suggesting that host specificity within F. oxysporum may be determined by pathogenicity chromosomes. Such pathogenicity chromosomes have not been identified in vascular wilt pathogens of the Verticillium genus for which genome sequences have recently been determined as well.
Most fungal vascular wilt pathogens overwinter as resting structures in the soil or on dead host tissues. These include microsclerotia, chlamydospores, thick-walled mycelium, and spore-bearing coremia that all can survive for an extended period of time without losing viability. Compounds released from host plants, referred to as exudates, trigger germination of these resting structures. Except for Ophiostoma spp. and the oak wilt pathogen Ceratocystis fagacearum that are transmitted by beetles, fungal vascular wilt pathogens enter their host plants through the roots. Following penetration, the fungi colonize the cortical cells from where hyphae migrate intercellularly toward the vascular parenchyma cells and invade the xylem vessels. In the xylem, conidiospores are produced which are disseminated acropetally with xylem sap movement. Fungal vascular wilt pathogens are mostly restricted to xylem vessels, but once host tissues become necrotized also these are colonized and the fungus starts to produce resting structures which are released into the soil eventually.
BACTERIAL VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
Seven bacterial genera contain vascular wilt pathogens: Clavibacter (causing ring rot of potato and bacterial canker and wilt of tomato), Curtobacterium (bacterial wilt of beans), Erwinia (bacterial wilt of cucurbits), Pantoea (stewart’s wilt of corn), Ralstonia (southern bacterial wilt of Solanaceous crops and Moko disease of banana), Xanthomonas (black rot of crucifers, bacterial blight of rice), and Xylella (Pierce’s disease of grape, citrus variegation chlorosis;;;;;; ). Bacterial vascular wilt pathogens overwinter in plant debris in soil, in seeds, in vegetative propagules, or in their insect vectors as dormant cells. They enter host tissues only passively, via wounds, cracks, or natural openings such as stomata and hydathodes, while others are directly delivered into the xylem by insect vectors, such as Xylella fastidiosa by sharpshooter leafhoppers and spittlebugs, Pantoea stewartii by corn flea beetles and E. tracheiphila by cucumber beetles. After entrance, they rapidly multiply and invade the root cortex and vascular parenchyma intercellularly, from where they spread to the xylem vessels that are used as avenues for passive spread to aerial plant parts. During colonization, bacterial wilt pathogens degrade xylem cell wall components, parenchyma cells, and pit membranes, resulting in slimy masses of bacteria and cellular debris.
OOMYCETE VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
Only one oomycete genus, Pythium, contains vascular wilt pathogens. Pythium mainly infects seeds or seedlings in the soil, causing pre-emergence or post-emergence seedling damping-off disease, and young and juvenile plant tissues. The genus Pythium comprises many complex species, most of which are plant pathogens, while others are saprophytes or animal parasites. Pythium species survive in soil or in organic substrates for long periods of time as dormant oospores; thick-walled sexual spores that can withstand harsh environmental conditions. Oospores germinate upon stimulation by exudates released from plants, and often produce a sporangium containing zoospores that are released and encysted after host contact. Alternatively, oospores produce germinating hyphae to penetrate the root epidermis, migrate through the cortex, endodermis, and parenchyma cells, and eventually invade the vascular stele causing typical damping-off symptoms.
XYLEM STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT
The xylem consists of distinct cells with special wall structures that allow efficient transport of water and solutes from the roots to upper plant parts. The xylem functions not only in long distance transport, but also provides physical strength to the plant. Xylem development occurs in two phases during which primary and secondary xylem is produced. Primary development involves the formation of primary xylem from procambium cells which are derived from the apical meristem. Procambium cells give rise to xylem precursor cells that eventually differentiate into treachery elements, xylem parenchyma cells or fiber cells; collectively called the xylem. Treachery elements, which consist of tracheid and vessel elements, are the main conductive tissues. While the xylem parenchyma cells are metabolically active and adapted for storage and transport, the xylem fiber cells together with treachery elements provide physical support. Following xylem differentiation, the treachery elements undergo cell elongation before the initiation of secondary xylem wall development. The secondary xylem walls, which are derived from vascular cambium, are deposited onto the primary xylem walls. Secondary xylem is made of cellulose microfibrils, crystalline aggregates of linear polymers of D-glucopyranosyl residues linked in β-(1-4) conformation. The secondary xylem walls are further impregnated with different polysaccharides, such as lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and structural proteins that add strength and rigidity to the wall. Subsequently, the secondary xylem walls are lignified, cross-linked, and eventually waterproofed by polymerization of the aromatic compound monolignol. The patterned secondary xylem walls provide physical strength to the treachery elements to withstand the negative pressure generated during transpiration and by the compressive pressure from surrounding cells.
The final step of xylem development is the induction of programed cell death (PCD) that destroys the cellular contents of treachery elements, leaving behind hollow tube-like vessels through which water and nutrients flow. The PCD is developmentally regulated and is strongly associated with secondary xylem wall formation. The vessel tubes are dedicated to the unrestricted water and solute movement throughout the plant and individual vessels are interconnected through small openings called pits. Pits between vessels typically have overarching secondary walls that form a bowl-shaped chamber, referred to as a border pit. Border pit exists in pairs and contain a pit membrane at the center, which is formed from primary walls and the intervening middle lamella. The pit membrane is made of cellulose microfibrils embedded in polysaccharide matrix of hemicellulose and pectin. This fine mesh-like and tightly interlocked polysaccharide structure has minute openings through which water and solutes can move with a minimal resistance between vessels or to neighboring parenchyma cells. In angiosperm trees, the pit pore diameter varies between 5 and 20 nm, thus acting as a safety mechanism to limit the spread of embolism within xylem vessels.
All vascular wilt pathogens have to breach the highly structured and rigid secondary xylem walls to enter the vessels. Also the pit membranes are a major barriers for vascular pathogens as vascular wilt pathogens are too large to pass pit membrane pores. For example, the rod-shaped bacterium Xylella fastidiosa has a cell size of 0.25–0.5 μm in diameter, while the conidia of Verticillium species have a diameter of about 2.2 μm.
THE XYLEM AS A NICHE FOR VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
The xylem is a nutritionally poor environment, which could be an important reason why only a limited number of plant pathogens are able to thrive in this environment. Possibly, vascular wilt pathogens exploit this niche to avoid competition with other microbes. However, as they reside in the xylem for the major part of their lifecycle, vascular pathogens need to be able to obtain all factors required for growth, reproduction, and survival.
NUTRIENT COMPOSITION OF XYLEM SAP
Nitrate, sulfate, and phosphate are among the most abundant inorganic anions in the xylem sap, whereas calcium, potassium, magnesium, and manganese are the most predominate inorganic cations present in the xylem sap of oilseed rape. Although only in relatively low amounts, xylem sap also contains various carbohydrates, such as glucose, fructose, saccharose, maltose, raffinose, trehalose, and ribose. Of these, glucose, fructose, and saccharose are predominant and are utilized as a carbon source for growth. Xylem sap furthermore contains various proteins, amino acids, and organic acids, which can also act as source of organic and inorganic nutrients. For instance, the sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cysteine can be used as a source of inorganic sulfur. Nevertheless, the quantities of the organic and inorganic compounds in the xylem sap are extremely low and fluctuate with day time, growth condition, and plant species.
NUTRIENT ACQUISITION BY VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
Vascular wilt pathogens satisfy their nutritional requirements by efficiently acquiring the scarce nutrients available in the xylem sap, by enzymatic digestion of host cell walls, by invading neighboring cells, or by inducing nutrient leakage from surrounding tissues.
Nitrogen is one of the limiting nutrients in the xylem sap for vascular wilt pathogens. The preferred primary nitrogen sources for fungal pathogens, ammonia, glutamine, and glutamate, are scarce in xylem sap. In absence of primary nitrogen sources, fungi can utilize secondary nitrogen sources such as nitrate, nitrite, purines, amides, amino acids, and proteins. GATA transcription factors, such as the F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici global nitrogen regulator (FNR1), are known to regulate utilization of secondary nitrogen sources. FNR1 mutants grow normally on primary nitrogen sources, but fail to utilize secondary nitrogen sources such as amino acids, hypoxanthine, and uric acid. Disruption of FNR1 not only affected virulence of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici on tomato, but also regulation of three nitrogen acquisition genes, Gap1, Mtd1, and Uricase during growth in planta, suggesting that FNR1 regulates the utilization of secondary nitrogen sources in planta.
Analysis of the whole genome sequences of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, V. dahliae, and V. albo-atrum showed that these genomes are enriched in genes that encode cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) that may be used for the enzymatic digestion of xylem walls and pit membranes. Also other vascular wilt pathogens are known as CWDE producers. While degrading cell wall components, these enzymes liberate sugars that may be used as nutrient sources.
Various vascular wilt pathogens produce high- and low-molecular weight phytotoxins during host colonization that have often been associated with wilt symptom development. As several phytotoxins disturb plant cell membrane integrity, leakage of nutrients may occur from cells surrounding the xylem vessels that can be utilized by vascular wilt pathogens. For instance, two Verticillium necrosis- and ethylene inducing-like proteins, NLP1 and NLP2, were shown to display cytotoxic activity and differentially contribute to virulence on various host plant species, although the mechanism through which these NLPs contribute to virulence remains unclear. Interestingly, compared with other ascomycete plant pathogens that typically contain up to three NLP genes, the NLP gene family is expanded in the V. dahliae genome. A similar expansion has been reported for the F. oxysporum genome, and it has been speculated that this expansion has contributed to their broad host range among dicotyledonous plant hosts. However, in addition to NLP1 and NLP2, none of the other V. dahliae NLPs were found to display cytotoxic activity, and their potential role in fungal virulence still remains enigmatic.
Finally, although most vascular wilt pathogens are confined to xylem vessels, some of them degrade xylem vessel walls to colonize adjacent parenchyma cells. These pathogens may obtain nutrition by parasitizing parenchyma cells.
PLANT DEFENSE AGAINST VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
Plants deploy two types of defenses against invading pathogens: pre-existing and inducible plant defense responses. The pre-existing defenses are constitutive and provide physical and chemical barriers against attempted host penetration. Once successful pathogens breach pre-existing defenses, they encounter a spectrum of inducible defense responses with microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP)-triggered immunity (MTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) as two extreme ends. While MTI is activated upon recognition of conserved MAMPs, ETI is activated upon recognition of secreted effector proteins (Figure 1).
PERCEPTION OF VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS
In general, plants sense invading pathogens by using two types of receptors: extra- and intracellular receptors (Figure 1). While extracellular receptors recognize pathogen molecules on the cellular surface as well as damage-associated host molecules that are released as a consequence of pathogen activity, intracellular receptors recognize pathogen molecules that are delivered inside host cells (Figure 1). This extra- and intracellular receptor-mediated recognition of pathogen molecules [microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs)/pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), effectors] leads to the activation of plant innate immunity that wards off invading pathogens. Consequently, failure of a host plant to perceive invading pathogens leads to susceptibility and successful pathogen infections (Figure 2).
Extracellular plant receptors
Several MAMP receptors have been characterized, including Arabidopsis FLS2 (flagellin-sensitive 2), EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor), and CERK1 (chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1), and rice CEBiP (chitin elicitor binding protein). While FLS2 and EFR encode receptor-like kinases (RLKs) that recognize the bacterial MAMPs flg22 and EF-Tu, respectively, CERK1 and CEBiP encode LysM domain-containing receptors that recognize chitin, the main constituent of fungal cell walls. These MAMP receptors are considered to display a low degree of specificity and broadly act in pathogen defense.
Extracellular plant receptors that play a role in plant defense against specific vascular wilt pathogens have also been described. Rice Xa21 confers resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo; ). Xa21 recognizes Ax21 (activator of Xa21), a type I-secreted sulfated protein. Similar to FLS2 and EFR, Xa21 encodes a RLK. Xa21 physically interacts with XB24, a protein with a C-terminal ATP synthase (ATPase) motif. XB24 promotes autophosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues on Xa21 through its ATPase activity, keeping Xa21 in an inactive state. Upon Xa21-mediated Ax21 recognition, the Xa21 kinase becomes activated, triggering rice defense responses. XB25, plant-specific ankyrin-repeat family protein, and BiP3, an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein, are also reported to be involved in Xa21-mediated rice immunity against Xoo.
Tomato Ve1 is another example of extracellular plant receptor that plays a role in xylem defense. Ve1 is an extracellular leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein (RLP;; ) that provides resistance against race 1 isolates of V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Interestingly, have recently shown that interfamily transfer of Ve1 gene to Arabidopsis confers resistance against race 1 isolates of V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Recently, the pathogen ligand that is perceived by Ve1 was identified as the Ave1 effector, a small (134 aa) effector protein with four cysteines that is required for full virulence on tomato plants lacking Ve1. Ave1 is homologous to a widespread family of plant natriuretic peptides, mobile signaling molecules that play a role in the regulation of water and ion homeostasis, and it was suggested that Ave1 was acquired by Verticillium through horizontal gene transfer from plants. Ave1 homologs are found in a few other plant pathogens, including the vascular wilt fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, but a role in virulence has not yet been demonstrated for these homologs. Intriguingly, the Ave1 homolog from F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici is recognized by Ve1 upon transient co-expression in tobacco, and Ve1 was found to mediate resistance toward F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato.
Recently, have reported the presence of a functional Ve1 ortholog in the tobacco species Nicotiana glutinosa, as Ave1 expression in N. glutinosa causes an hypersensitive response (HR), rapid and localized cell death of plant tissue surrounding the site where recognition of pathogen effectors by host immune receptors occurs. Furthermore, N. glutinosa shows resistance against race 1 V. dahliae that is compromised upon inoculation with an Ave1 deletion mutant of a race 1 V. dahliae isolate.
Intracellular plant receptors
Also intracellular plant receptors that mediate plant defense against xylem-invading pathogens have been characterized. The tomato I-2 gene is an intracellular receptor that contributes to resistance against race 2 isolates of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. It encodes a cytoplasmic CC (coiled-coil)–NBS (nucleotide-binding site)–LRR receptor protein that recognizes the effector protein Avr2, which was initially identified from the xylem sap of tomato infected by F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and is taken up by tomato cells.
The Arabidopsis RRS1-R resistance protein is an intracellular plant receptor that confers resistance against R. solanacearum. RRS1-R encodes a TIR (Toll/interleukin1 receptor)–NBS–LRR R-protein and contains a C-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a WRKY domain. It recognizes the R. solanacearum type III-secreted effector protein PopP2. RRS1-R physically interacts with the effector PopP2. RRS1-R requires RD19, a cysteine protease that also binds to PopP2. RD19 is localized in the vacuole in absence of PopP2 and re-localizes to the nucleus in the presence of PopP2. However, no direct interaction between RRS1-R and RD19 has been reported so far. Thus, the current notion is that RRS1-R potentially recognizes the RD19/PopP2 complex in the nucleus and activates the Arabidopsis ETI against R. solanacearum.
PLANT DEFENSE RESPONSES IN THE XYLEM
Comparison of the transcriptional changes in tomato induced by Cladosporium fulvum, a fungal foliar pathogen that causes leaf mold of tomato, with those induced by the vascular wilt pathogen V. dahliae revealed that the Cladosporium fulvum-induced transcriptional changes showed little overlap with those induced by V. dahliae. Moreover, within the subset of genes that are regulated by both pathogens, many genes showed inverse regulation.
Recognition of vascular wilt pathogens mediated by either extracellular or intracellular receptors leads to the activation of defense responses in the xylem vessels. These comprise physical defense responses which halt or contain the pathogen from further spread in the xylem vessels, and chemical defense responses that kill the pathogen or inhibit its growth (Figure 2).
A common defense mechanism in xylem vessels against vascular wilt pathogens is the formation of tyloses. Tyloses are outgrowths of vessel-associated parenchyma cells which protrude into the xylem vessel through pits and block the spread of pathogens. They are formed during both compatible and incompatible interactions between the host and vascular wilt pathogens, although the time and extent of tylose formation significantly differs (Figure 2). Tyloses form much faster and more extensively in resistant plants when compared to susceptible plants.
Often, the generation of tyloses is associated with the production of gels and gums around the differentiated tylose. Using immuno-gold labeling, strong accumulation of pectin-rich materials around the parenchyma cells, pit membrane, and the newly emerging tylose was observed in the xylem vessels of Platanus acerifolia cultivar infected by Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp. platani. Plants potentially accumulate these pectin-rich gels and gums around tyloses to completely seal off a xylem vessel to prevent the vascular wilt pathogen from spread to adjacent xylem vessels. However, complete sealing of xylem vessels can be disadvantageous for the plant as well. If tylose formation affects too many vessels and no new vessels are formed, tylose formation can result in drought stress.
Another typical symptom of Verticillium infection is vein clearing. Based on infections of V. longisporum on Arabidopsis and Brassica napus, it was recently reported that this vein clearing is caused by Verticillium-induced transdifferentiation of chloroplast-containing bundle sheath cells to functional xylem elements. In addition, it was shown that infected Arabidopsis wild-type plants display enhanced drought stress tolerance compared with non-infected plants, suggesting that Verticillium infection activates a tissue-specific developmental program that compensates for compromised water transport.
Another physical defense response observed during xylem colonization is vascular coating. A quick vascular wall coating around the initially infected and the adjacent xylem vessels, infusing the pit membrane and primary walls was observed in resistant chili pepper inoculated with R. solanacearum, whereas the xylem wall coating was not observed in susceptible chili pepper. Similar coating of xylem parenchyma cells induced by V. albo-atrum was reported in tomato and alfalfa, indicating that infusion of pit membranes, primary walls and parenchyma cells with coating materials could prevent lateral and vertical spreading of vascular wilt pathogens in the xylem vessels. Furthermore, callose deposition and swelling of the primary walls of the xylem vessels was reported during the interaction of R. solanacearum with chili pepper. Previously, a similar deposition of callose in resistant and susceptible tomato infected with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici was reported. However, the resistant cultivar maintains a stronger level of callose deposition during the course of the infection than the susceptible cultivar. This high level deposition of callose in the resistant cultivar around the initially infected cells could inhibit pathogens from further spread.
Xylem colonization by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris has been reported to activate vascular immunity that triggers an HR, referred to as vascular HR. Vascular immunity was proposed based on the fact that AvrACXcc8004 (also referred to as XopAC), a type III effector protein of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris that confers avirulence in Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0, provides resistance when exclusively targeted to the vascular system. Infiltration of AvrACXcc8004 into leaf mesophyll tissue of Col-0 did not trigger resistance against Xanthomonas, implying that AvrACXcc8004-mediated activation of defense (vascular immunity) occurs in the xylem. previously reported that the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris effector protein AvrXccFM elicits vascular HR on Florida mustard seedlings. It is, however, important to note that unlike the HR occurring in leaf mesophyll cells, vascular HR is difficult to score.
WAT1 (Walls Are Thin1), which is involved in secondary cell wall deposition, is also implicated in vascular immunity. WAT1 mutant Arabidopsis plants are resistant to bacterial and fungal vascular wilt pathogens but not to foliar pathogens. In leaf inoculation assays, wat1 provides resistance to R. solanacearum and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris only when directly injected into the vascular system, but not when injected into mesophyll tissues, demonstrating the tissue-specific immune response. Likely, wat1 resistance involves root-localized metabolic channeling away from indole metabolites to salicylic acid.
Arabidopsis AHL19, an AT-hook DNA binding protein, provides enhanced resistance to three plant pathogenic Verticillium spp. but not to the foliar pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Plectosphaerella cucumerina, and Alternaria brassicicola and enhanced susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, suggesting a role as positive regulator of xylem-specific plant immunity.
Xylem infection causes drastic metabolic changes in xylem parenchyma cells, which are located adjacent to the infected vessels. These metabolic changes lead to the accumulation of different proteins and secondary metabolites in the xylem sap. Some of the proteins and secondary metabolites that accumulate in the xylem sap during xylem colonization include PR-1, PR-2, PR-3, PR-4, PR-5, peroxidases, proteases, xyloglucan-endotransglycosylase (XET), and xyloglucan-specific endoglucanase inhibitor protein (XEGIP), phenols, phytoalexins, and lignin-like compounds. These compounds are known to contribute directly or indirectly to plant defense. The PR-1, PR-2, PR-3, and PR-5 were also among the proteins abundantly accumulated in xylem sap during compatible interaction between Fusarium and tomato. For instance, PR-2 (β-1, 3-glucanase) and PR-3 (chitinase) hydrolyze the fungal cell wall component β-1,3-glucan and chitin, respectively. In addition, antimicrobial activity of PR-5 proteins has also been demonstrated toward multiple pathogens, implying that the presence of these proteins in xylem sap could inhibit or slow down the growth of the fungal vascular wilt pathogens in the xylem vessels.
Peroxidases are among the abundantly accumulated enzymes in xylem sap during host colonization of vascular wilt pathogens. The cationic peroxidase, PO-C1, accumulates in the cytoplasm, the primary and secondary walls of the xylem parenchyma, and lumen cells during incompatible interactions between Xoo and rice. Peroxidases are heme-containing enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of different substrates using hydrogen peroxides as an electron acceptor. Peroxidases are known to be involved in the production of reactive oxygen species through their enzymatic activity and reactive oxygen species are toxic compounds that can eliminate vascular wilt pathogens. Furthermore, peroxidases are implicated in the polymerization of cell wall compounds, lignin and suberin biosynthesis, and regulation of hydrogen peroxide levels, which all can contribute to defense.
Plants accumulate different phenolic compounds in the xylem in response to infection. Olive trees accumulate phenols such as rutin, oleuropein, luteolin-7-glucoside, and tyrosol at the site of V. dahliae infection that were shown to have a toxic effect on V. dahliae. Interestingly, exogenous treatment of Dutch elm trees with phenolic compounds induces accumulation of suberin-like compounds in the xylem tissue and thereby increases resistance to O. novo-ulmi. This indicates that, in addition to direct toxicity, phenolic compounds could also activate other defense responses against vascular wilt pathogens.
Plants employ not only complex organic phytoalexins as defense mechanism against vascular wilt pathogens, but also employ inorganic compounds such as elemental sulfur and sulfur-containing inorganic compounds. During an incompatible interaction between V. dahliae and tomato elemental sulfur mainly accumulates in xylem parenchyma cells, xylem vessel walls, and around the vascular occluding gels. Similar accumulation of elemental sulfur has been observed in an incompatible interaction between V. dahliae and cacao (Theobroma cacao) or cotton. The accumulation of inorganic sulfur specifically in xylem vessel walls and around the vascular occluding gels might suggest its role in eliminating vascular wilt pathogens that are arrested by physical defense responses.
Overall, chemical defense responses play major roles in xylem defense. Some chemical compounds accumulated in xylem sap after infection modulate the morphology of xylem tissue and by doing so inhibit vertical and lateral colonization of the pathogens, whereas other compounds accumulate during xylem infection have antimicrobial activity and can eliminate vascular wilt pathogens contained by the physical defense responses.
CONCLUSION
Vascular wilt pathogens have adapted to thrive in the xylem, which is known as a nutrient-poor niche, causing vascular wilt diseases on hundreds of plant species. Recognition of vascular wilt pathogens by both extra- and intracellular plant receptors triggers plant innate immune responses that comprise physical and chemical defenses. Both types of defense responses occur in the xylem vessels in a coordinated manner, where physical defense responses mainly prevent the pathogens from spreading in the xylem vessels and chemical defense responses kill the pathogen or inhibit its growth.
Currently, little is known about the interaction between vascular wilt pathogens and their hosts. As this interaction takes place in xylem vessels which are located deep in the plant interior, the molecular basis underlying the interaction between vascular wilt pathogens and their hosts remains largely obscure. Genetic resistance is the best strategy for controlling vascular wilt pathogens. To develop genetic resistance, however, a deeper understanding of the host defense mechanisms as well as the biology, evolution and pathogenicity of vascular wilt pathogens is required.
VASCULAR WILT PATHOGENS INDUCE DROUGHT STRESS
Wilting of plant parts as a consequence of xylem dysfunction is the most conspicuous symptom of vascular wilt disease. have nicely demonstrated using stable carbon isotope labeling that Xylella fastidiosa induces drought stress in alfalfa. Many factors can contribute to xylem occlusion, such as high- and low-molecular weight polysaccharides secreted by vascular wilt pathogens during xylem colonization and the presence of pathogen biomass (bacterial cells and fungal and oomycete mycelium and spores) in the xylem vessels. However, also plant defense responses can contribute to xylem occlusion, such as tyloses that are formed by the parenchyma cells and gum and gels that are secreted. Embolism (the formation of air bubbles) in xylem vessels is another factor that can reduce the hydraulic conductivity of the xylem. have demonstrated using magnetic resonance imaging that Xylella fastidiosa-infected grape displayed early occurrence of embolism, which correlated with decreased xylem conductivity and drought stress. Although several research reports identify a correlation between xylem infection and drought stress, a recent report revealed enhanced drought tolerance in Arabidopsis upon Verticillium infection. Arabidopsis plants infected with V. longisporum exhibited increased de novo xylem formation with newly transdifferentiated xylem vessels that were able to compensate for the occluded ones. Consequently, the plants showed higher drought stress tolerance when compared with non-infected plants.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 138
- 1.
Agrios G. N. (2005 ). Plant Pathology. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press
Not in our library
- 2.
Alvarez S. Marsh E. L. Schroeder S. G. Schachtman D. P. (2008 ). Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 31 325–340
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01770.x
- 3.
Báidez A. G. Gómez P. Del Rïo J. A Ortuño A. (2007 ). Dysfunctionality of the xylem in Olea europaea L. plants associated with the infection process by Verticillium dahliae Kleb. role of phenolic compounds in plant defense mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 3373–3377
Not in our library10.1021/jf063166d
- 4.
Basha S. Mazhar H. Vasanthaiah H. (2010 ). Proteomics approach to identify unique xylem sap proteins in Pierce’s disease-tolerant Vitis species. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 160 932–944
Not in our library10.1007/s12010-009-8620-1
- 5.
Beattie G. A. (2011 ). Water relations in the interaction of foliar bacterial pathogens with plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49 533–555
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114436
- 6.
Beckman C. H. (1964 ). Host responses to vascular infection. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2 231–252
Not in our library
- 7.
Beckman C. H. Mueller W. C. Tessier B. J. Harrison N. A. (1982 ). Recognition and callose deposition in response to vascular infection in Fusarium wilt-resistant or susceptible tomato plants. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 20 1–10
Not in our library
- 8.
Bernoux M. Timmers T. Jauneau A. Brière C. de Wit P. J. G. M. Marco Y. (2008 ). RD19, an Arabidopsis cysteine protease required for RRS1-R-mediated resistance, is relocalized to the nucleus by the Ralstonia solanacearum PopP2 effector. Plant Cell 20 2252–2264
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.108.058685
- 9.
Bolton M. D Thomma B. P. H. J. (2008 ). The complexity of nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen-regulated gene expression in plant pathogenic fungi. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 72 104–110
Not in our library
- 10.
Brett C. T. (2000 ). Cellulose microfibrils in plants: biosynthesis, deposition, and integration into the cell wall. Int. Rev. Cytol. 199 161–199
Not in our library10.1016/s0074-7696(00)99004-1
- 11.
Castañeda A. Reddy J. D. El-Yacoubi B. Gabriel D. W. (2005 ). Mutagenesis of all eight avr genes in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris had no detected effect on pathogenicity, but one avr gene affected race specificity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18 1306–1317
Not in our library10.1094/mpmi-18-1306
- 12.
Chatterjee S. Almeida R. P. P. Lindow S. (2008 ). Living in two worlds: the plant and insect lifestyles of Xylella fastidiosa. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 46 243–271
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094342
- 13.
Chen X. Chern M. Canlas P. E. Ruan D. Jiang C. Ronald P. C. (2010 ). An ATPase promotes autophosphorylation of the pattern recognition receptor XA21 and inhibits XA21-mediated immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 8029–8034
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0912311107
- 14.
Chen X. Ronald P. C. (2011 ). Innate immunity in rice. Trends Plant Sci. 16 451–459
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2011.04.003
- 15.
Choat B. Ball M. Luly J. Holtum J. (2003 ). Pit membrane porosity and water stress-induced cavitation in four co-existing dry rainforest tree species. Plant Physiol. 131 41–48
Not in our library10.1104/pp.014100
- 16.
Choat B. Cobb A. R. Jansen S. (2008 ). Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytol. 177 608–626
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02317.x
- 17.
Choat B. Jansen S. Zwieniecki M. A. Smets E. Holbrook N. M. (2004 ). Changes in pit membrane porosity due to deflection and stretching: the role of vestured pits. J. Exp. Bot. 55 1569–1575
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erh173
- 18.
Choat B. Pittermann J. (2009 ). New insights into bordered pit structure and cavitation resistance in angiosperms and conifers. New Phytol. 182 557–560
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02847.x
- 19.
Clérivet A. Déon V. Alami I. Lopez F. Geiger J. P. Nicole M. (2000 ). Tyloses and gels associated with cellulose accumulation in vessels are responses of plane tree seedlings (Platanus × acerifolia) to the vascular fungus Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp platani. Trees Struct. Funct. 15 25–31
Not in our library
- 20.
Cooper R. M. Resende M. L. V. Flood J. Rowan M. G. Beale M. H. Potter U. (1996 ). Detection and cellular localization of elemental sulphur in disease-resistant genotypes of Theobroma cacao. Nature 379 159–162
Not in our library
- 21.
Cooper R. M. Williams J. S. (2004 ). Elemental sulphur as an induced antifungal substance in plant defence. J. Exp. Bot. 55 1947–1953
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erh179
- 22.
Daugherty M. Lopes J. S. Almeida R. P. (2010 ). Strain-specific alfalfa water stress induced by Xylella fastidiosa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 127 333–340
Not in our library
- 23.
De Boer A. H. Volkov V. (2003 ). Logistics of water and salt transport through the plant: structure and functioning of the xylem. Plant Cell Environ. 26 87–101
Not in our library
- 24.
De Jonge R. Van Esse H. P. Maruthachalam K. Bolton M. D. Santhanam P. Saber M. K. (2012 ). Tomato immune receptor Ve1 recognizes effector of multiple fungal pathogens uncovered by genome and RNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 5110–5115
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1119623109
- 25.
Denancé N. Ranocha P. Oria N. Barlet X. Rivière M.-P. Yadeta K. A. (2012 ). Arabidopsis wat1 (walls are thin1)-mediated resistance to the bacterial vascular pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum, is accompanied by cross-regulation of salicylic acid and tryptophan metabolism. Plant J.
Not in our library
- 26.
Deslandes L. Olivier J. Peeters N. Feng D. X. Khounlotham M. Boucher C. (2003 ). Physical interaction between RRS1-R, a protein conferring resistance to bacterial wilt, and PopP2, a type III effector targeted to the plant nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 8024–8029
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1230660100
- 27.
Deslandes L. Olivier J. Theulières F. Hirsch J. Feng D. X. Bittner-Eddy P. (2002 ). Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in Arabidopsis thaliana is conferred by the recessive RRS1-R gene, a member of a novel family of resistance genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 2404–2409
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.032485099
- 28.
Di Pietro A. Madrid M. P. Caracuel Z. Delgado-Jarana J Roncero M. I. G. (2003 ). Fusarium oxysporum: exploring the molecular arsenal of a vascular wilt fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4 315–325
Not in our library10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00180.x
- 29.
Divon H. H. Fluhr R. (2007 ). Nutrition acquisition strategies during fungal infection of plants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 266 65–74
Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00504.x
- 30.
Divon H. H. Rothan-Denoyes B. Davydov O. Di Pietro A. Fluhr R. (2005 ). Nitrogen-responsive genes are differentially regulated in planta during Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6 459–470
Not in our library10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00297.x
- 31.
Divon H. H. Ziv C. Davydov O. Yarden O. Fluhr R. (2006 ). The global nitrogen regulator, FNR1, regulates fungal nutrition-genes and fitness during Fusarium oxysporum pathogenesis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7 485–497
Not in our library10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00354.x
- 32.
Dodds P. N. Rathjen J. P. (2010 ). Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11 539–548
Not in our library10.1038/nrg2812
- 33.
Donofrio N. M. Mitchell T. K. Dean R. A. Wang G.-L. Valent B. (2009 ). “The significance of nitrogen regulation, source and availability on the interaction between rice and rice blast,” in Advances in Genetics, Genomics and Control of Rice Blast Disease, edsWang G.-L. Valent B. (Dordrecht: Springer) 59–72
Not in our library
- 34.
Emons A. M. C. Mulder B. M. (2000 ). How the deposition of cellulose microfibrils builds cell wall architecture. Trends Plant Sci. 5 35–40
Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01507-1
- 35.
Fernandez-Garcia N. Hernandez M. Casado-Vela J. Bru R. Elortza F. Hedden P. (2011 ). Changes to the proteome and targeted metabolites of xylem sap inBrassica oleracea in response to salt stress. Plant Cell Environ. 34 821–836
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02285.x
- 36.
Fradin E. F. Abd-El-Haliem A. Masini L. van den Berg G. C. M. Joosten M. H. A. J. Thomma B. P. H. J. (2011 ). Interfamily transfer of tomato ve1 mediates Verticillium resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156 2255–2265
Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.180067
- 37.
Fradin E. F Thomma B. P. H. J. (2006 ). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7 71–86
Not in our library10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x
- 38.
Fradin E. F. Zhang Z. Ayala J. C. J. Castroverde C. D. M. Nazar R. N. Robb J. (2009 ). Genetic dissection of Verticillium wilt resistance mediated by tomato ve1. Plant Physiol. 150 320–332
Not in our library10.1104/pp.109.136762
- 39.
Fukuda H. (1996 ). Xylogenesis: initiation, progression, and cell death. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47 299–325
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.299
- 40.
Fukuda H. (1997 ). Programmed cell death during vascular system formation. Cell Death Differ. 4 684–688
Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4400310
Cited by papers we hold 5
- Application of Bacterial Endophytes to Control Bacterial Leaf Blight Disease and Promote Rice Growth · 2022Not checked
- A predatory myxobacterium controls cucumber Fusarium wilt by regulating the soil microbial community · 2020Not checked
- Modulation of the Root Microbiome by Plant Molecules: The Basis for Targeted Disease Suppression and Plant Growth Promotion · 2020No notice
- Verticillium dahliae Disease Resistance and the Regulatory Pathway for Maturity and Tuberization in Potato · 2018Not checked
- Xylem Vessel Diameter Affects the Compartmentalization of the Vascular Pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in Grapevine · 2017Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.