Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Pathogenesis of Multiple Organ Injury in COVID-19 and Potential Therapeutic Strategies

Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco, Pedro Leme Silva, Fernanda Ferreira Cruz and 6 more

Frontiers in Physiology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.593223

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, formerly 2019-nCoV) is a novel coronavirus that has rapidly disseminated worldwide, causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As of January 6th, 2021, there were over 86 million global confirmed cases, and the disease has claimed over 1.87 million lives (a ∼2.2% case fatality rate). SARS-CoV-2 is able to infect human cells by binding its spike (S) protein to angiotensin-conversing enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is expressed abundantly in several cell types and tissues. ACE2 has extensive biological activities as a component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and plays a pivotal role as counter-regulator of angiotensin II (Ang II) activity by converting the latter to Ang (1-7). Virion binding to ACE2 for host cell entry leads to internalization of both via endocytosis, as well as activation of ADAM17/TACE, resulting in downregulation of ACE2 and loss of its protective actions in the lungs and other organs. Although COVID-19 was initially described as a purely respiratory disease, it is now known that infected individuals can rapidly progress to a multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In fact, all human structures that express ACE2 are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or to the downstream effects of reduced ACE2 levels, namely systemic inflammation and injury. In this review, we aim to summarize the major features of SARS-CoV-2 biology and the current understanding of COVID-19 pathogenesis, as well as its clinical repercussions in the lung, heart, kidney, bowel, liver, and brain. We also highlight potential therapeutic targets and current global efforts to identify safe and effective therapies against this life-threatening condition.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

In late 2019, a cluster of infections by a novel coronavirus – the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, formerly 2019-nCoV) – was epidemiologically linked to a large seafood market in Wuhan, China. This outbreak has rapidly disseminated domestically and internationally, becoming a global pandemic1. SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated to be much more infectious than SARS-CoV and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which were responsible for two previous large-scale outbreaks (Table 1). As of January 6th, 2020, there were over 86 million global confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and over 1.87 million fatalities2 3.

Human coronaviruses usually attach to cell-surface ectopeptidases, such as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), aminopeptidase N, and angiotensin-conversing enzyme 2 (ACE2), for host cell entry. Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 were found to use ACE2, which has extensive biological activities, as their key cell entry receptor. The distribution of ACE2 in the host organism appears to be an important factor associated with organ injury (Figure 1). There is also evidence that individual variation in expression and/or polymorphisms in ACE2 may influence susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 phenotype.

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 is very heterogeneous. Many individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or develop a mild illness with non-specific symptoms, such as fever, fatigue, dry cough, and headache. However, ∼20% of individuals require hospitalization, and ∼25% of these (∼5% of all cases) experience a rapid progression of their symptoms to severe pneumonia/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Individuals with a more severe phenotype usually have a high viral load and long virus-shedding period. Some risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 and poor prognosis include advanced age and presence of certain comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, although the latter remains controversial. Multivariable parameters such as higher sequential organ failure assessment score and D-dimer >1 μg/mL on hospital admission have also been associated with higher risk of fatality.

Although SARS-CoV-2 infection was initially described as causing severe respiratory disease, it is now known that infected individuals can rapidly progress to a multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS); therefore, multi-target therapeutic approaches are warranted, and a wide range of distinct therapeutic protocols have been investigated. In this review, we summarize major features of SARS-CoV-2 biology and the current understanding of COVID-19 pathogenesis, as well as its clinical repercussions in the lung, heart, kidney, bowel, liver, and brain. We also shed light on potential therapeutic targets and the current global efforts to identify effective therapies against this devastating condition.

The SARS-CoV-2 Genome

Coronaviruses are named for the crown-shaped spikes on their outer surface. The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped, 29.9 kb-long, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the β-coronavirus genus (Figure 2A). The open-reading frames (ORFs) 1a and 1b represent ∼70% of the complete viral genome and possess several conserved non-structural protein sequences. A frameshift between these ORFs encodes two polypeptides (1a and 1ab) that are processed by viral proteases to produce non-structural proteins, which are involved in viral replication and suppression of host innate immune defenses. Among all known coronavirus sequences, SARS-CoV-2 shares the highest genetic similarity with the bat coronavirus RATG13 (∼96%) and the Malayan pangolin coronavirus (∼91%), although it also has considerable genetic similarity with the human coronaviruses SARS-CoV (∼79%) and MERS-CoV (∼50%).

The SARS-CoV-2 Structure

The structure of SARS-CoV-2 is composed of four main structural proteins: the spike, envelope, and membrane glycoproteins, and the nucleocapsid protein (Figure 2B). The nucleocapsid is a phosphorylated protein which consists of the structure that directly binds to viral RNA and plays multiple critical roles during the viral life cycle. The envelope glycoprotein is a small, integral membrane structure involved in the maturation and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. The membrane glycoprotein is the most abundant component of the virus structure and plays a central role in viral assembly by interconnecting with all main structural proteins of the viral particle. This protein also delineates the shape of the viral envelope.

The spike glycoprotein is a transmembrane structure present in the outer surface of the viral particle (Figure 2C). It has two subunits (S1 and S2) that are cleaved by the host cell proteases. Interestingly, the furin protease-like cleavage spot is present in SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and human coronavirus OC43, but absent in SARS-CoV. The S1 subunit consists of an N-terminal domain and a receptor-binding domain (RBD), which determine host range and cellular tropism of the virus. This subunit is released during the fusion process, thus inducing a conformational change in the S2 subunit, which is the viral membrane-anchored fraction and consists of a hydrophobic fusion peptide and two heptad repeated domains.

The Host Cell Receptor

ACE2 is a zinc-dependent carboxypeptidase and component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), a complex network that plays a pivotal role in maintaining fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, thus affecting function of multiple organs (Figure 3). Briefly, the protease renin cleaves angiotensinogen to angiotensin I (Ang I), which is subsequently cleaved to Ang II by ACE. Ang II can bind to angiotensin type 1 receptors (AT1-R) and induce vasoconstriction as well as pro-inflammatory, oxidant, and fibrotic responses. On the other hand, ACE2 can convert Ang II to Ang (1-7), which binds to the Mas receptor and counteracts the aforementioned actions mediated by Ang II/AT1-R. ACE2 can also convert Ang I to Ang (1-9), which is subsequently cleaved to Ang (1-7) by ACE. However, the former pathway is more common due to higher affinity between ACE and Ang I.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Replication

SARS-CoV-2 RBD attaches to ACE2 for host cell entry (Figure 4), a proteolytic process that is facilitated by TMPRSS2 priming and involves cathepsin L. This interaction then triggers endocytosis of ACE2 together with the SARS-CoV-2 virion and fusion of the viral membrane and host cell. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 not only reduces surface tissue expression of ACE2, but also inhibits its messenger RNA expression after infection. Virus-host receptor interactions also activate ADAM17/TACE, a disintegrin and metalloprotease component, which leads to cleavage and shedding of ACE2 from the cell surface and local production of hyaluronan. Concomitantly, the viral spike protein is exposed to endosomal cysteine proteases that lead to its cleavage at two different sites: the first removes the S1 subunit, while the second occurs within the S2 subunit and results in exposure of the fusion peptide. Neutrophil elastase was recently found to exert an important role in SARS-CoV-2 infection, as it possesses a cleavage site near the S1-S2 subunits. The viral package is released into the host cytoplasm, where it usurps the cellular machinery to produce new viral particles. As SARS-CoV-2 is a single-stranded RNA virus, its own genetic material serves as messenger RNA, thus driving the synthesis of viral proteins by host cell ribosomes. The uncoated viral RNA encodes the 1a and 1ab polypeptides, which are processed into non-structural proteins. These form a complex with viral genomic RNA to continuously synthesize subgenomic products that encode structural proteins. TMPRSS2 also appears to participate in the SARS-CoV-2 replication process, although the mechanisms are unclear. In fact, protein-protein mapping has identified 332 high-confidence SARS-CoV-2/human protein-protein interactions involved with the virus life cycle. Once all viral components are produced and assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), the new viruses are released via exocytosis into the extracellular compartment.

Pathogenesis and Multiple Organ Injury in COVID-19

Many features of virus-host interactions involving SARS-CoV-2 remain unknown, but several of these have been demonstrated to recapitulate the infection process of other human coronaviruses. COVID-19 development and progression consist of five major pathological mechanisms (Figure 5): (1) direct virus-induced cytotoxicity in ACE2-expressing cells; (2) dysregulation of the RAAS as a result of virus-mediated ACE2 downregulation; (3) dysregulation of immune responses; (4) endothelial cell injury and thrombo-inflammation; and (5) tissue fibrosis.

The lungs possess several features that facilitate their role as an initial reservoir for viral replication and human-to-human transmission. Lung tissue has a large surface area, making it highly susceptible to inhaled viruses. It is also highly vascularized, which allows rapid dissemination of viral particles to other organs. Furthermore, ACE2 is expressed in several pulmonary cell types, with alveolar epithelial type II cells being the major ACE2-expressing cells. Gene ontology enrichment analysis has demonstrated that alveolar epithelial type II cells express multiple viral life cycle-associated functional genes, including those related to virus internalization, genome replication, assembly, and transmission.

The production and exocytosis of new viral particles can induce the host cell to undergo pyroptosis and release damage-associated molecular pattern signals. In lung tissue, these are recognized by adjacent epithelial and endothelial cells that are primed to activate certain transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), to produce and secrete pro-inflammatory mediators. Concomitantly, secretion of type I interferons occurs and induces antiviral actions by multiple mechanisms. In an immunocompetent response, these initial inflammatory signals are recognized by antigen-presenting cells—such as resident macrophages and dendritic cells—that present the foreign antigen to CD4+ T-cells, which then prime other CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, and B-cells. CD8+ T-cells are cytotoxic and directly kill virus-infected cells, whereas B-cells produce neutralizing antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike protein. Phagocytes remove apoptotic cells and neutralized viruses, resulting in well-coordinated clearance of infection with recovery and minimal lung tissue injury. On the other hand, during a faulty immune response occurs an intense inflammation with inefficient virus clearance, as well as overactivation of innate immunity with overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and others. This uncontrolled inflammatory process leads to alveolar-capillary barrier disruption; viral particles, along with the emerging cytokine storm, can then circulate to other organs, resulting in multiple organ dysfunction. Neutrophil extravasation into the alveolar space, hyaline membrane formation, and acute capillaritis are major features observed in histopathological analysis of lung cells in cases of severe COVID-19 (;;; BR236). The thromboembolic events observed in severe COVID-19 cases may also be associated with the inflammatory response triggered by the host-virus interaction, including activation of the coagulation cascade, formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and leakage of fluid in the subendothelial compartment.

The heterogeneous clinical manifestations in COVID-19 may be attributed to individual variation in expression not only of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors, but also of genes related to inflammation and immune responses. Accordingly, the excessive acute inflammatory responses seen in individuals with severe COVID-19 may lead to MODS and death. Compared to healthy individuals, those infected with SARS-CoV-2 have demonstrated increased serum concentrations of many pro-inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, interferon (IFN)-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CFS), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TNF-α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and others. This cytokine storm is even more evident in individuals admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as demonstrated by greater increases in serum concentration of several of these pro-inflammatory mediators, which suggests a correlation with disease severity. Aberrant pathogenic CD4+ T-cells co-expressing IFN-γ and G-CFS have also been observed in severe COVID-19. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has also been reported as a risk factor for mortality in hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. Nevertheless, individuals with severe COVID-19 may also present with lymphopenia, characterized by a significant reduction in peripheral CD4+ T-cell and CD8+ T-cell counts. Such countervailing effects may prevent complete clearance of SARS-CoV-2 or lead to secondary infections by opportunistic pathogens, thus resulting in a sepsis-like state. Below, we summarize the main features of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its potential repercussions on multiple organs (Figure 6).

Respiratory System

The lung is undoubtedly the organ most vulnerable to, and most affected by, SARS-CoV-2 infection. Accordingly, severe pneumonia is the most common and serious clinical manifestation observed in severe COVID-19 cases. As ACE2 is expressed in various cell types along the respiratory tract, SARS-CoV-2 may either enter through mucosal membranes in the upper respiratory tract or directly infect bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells in the lower respiratory tract. Interestingly, nasal expression of ACE2 was found to be lower in children compared to adults, which might partially explain age-related differences in the risk of developing COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has also been detected in the sputum of infected individuals before the onset of clinical symptoms, and in some cases, even 2 weeks after recovery. Current and former smokers, as well as individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, overexpress ACE2 in airway cells compared to non-smokers and healthy individuals, which may explain at least partly the increased risk of severe COVID-19 in these individuals.

ACE2 acts as a double-edged sword in both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection; it not only serves as the functional receptor for virus entry into host cells, but also has a pivotal role in protecting lung tissue from injury by counter-regulating the vasoconstrictive, pro-inflammatory, and pro-fibrotic effects of Ang II on pulmonary vascular and epithelial cells. Virus-receptor interactions lead to virion-ACE2 internalization or cleavage and shedding of ACE2, thus reducing its expression while promoting accumulation of Ang II, production of TNF-α and IL-6 receptor, and activation of macrophages to a pro-inflammatory state. Furthermore, the virus nucleocapsid protein may interact with Smad3 to prevent apoptosis of infected host cells, while promoting transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-mediated tissue fibrosis. As alveolar epithelial type II cells are self-renewing and express high levels of ACE2, they may be continuously targeted for viral entry and replication, which induces a vicious cycle of tissue injury and repair that may ultimately result in replacement of gas-exchange areas to non-functional fibrotic tissue. Lung stem/progenitor cells also express ACE2, and active virus replication in these cells may impair lung tissue repair.

In addition to the pivotal role of ACE2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis, a genome-wide association analysis identified other host genetic factors that may contribute to the development of COVID-19–induced respiratory failure. Although there were no single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, SNPs in a cluster of six genes on chromosome 3p21.31 (SLC6A20, ZTFL1, CCR9, FYCO1, CXCR6, and XCR1) were found to be potentially influential. Furthermore, ABO blood group has been suggested to be involved in susceptibility to SARS and COVID-19.

Lung histopathological findings have demonstrated considerable similarities among ARDS, SARS, and COVID-19. These consist of an increased neutrophil and mononuclear cell count, diffuse alveolar injury with proteinaceous alveolar exudates, and hyperplasia of epithelial type II cells. In more severe lung injury, thickened alveolar septa, hyaline membrane formation, and thrombus formation have been observed, as well as consolidation with fibroblast proliferation and fibrosis. Multinucleated giant cells in alveoli have also been found in some cases. An increased rate of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was found in COVID-19 cases admitted to the ICU, despite prophylactic use of anticoagulation agents; this can rapidly worsen lung function and lead to respiratory failure.

Based on chest computed tomography findings, COVID-19–induced lung impairment can be grouped into three main phenotypes: (1) multiple, focal, potently overperfused ground-glass opacities; (2) inhomogeneously dispersed atelectasis; and (3) typical moderate-to-severe ARDS, with alveolar edema and low compliance. As these phenotypes may be related to different pathological mechanisms and disease progression, personalized mechanical ventilation approaches should be implemented in order to allow more efficient clinical recovery for each individual.

Circulatory System

Coagulation dysfunction has been found in a high proportion of COVID-19 cases, as evidenced by increasing D-dimer levels and prolonged prothrombin time, as well as overt thrombotic manifestations. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in blood specimens of individuals with COVID-19; as ACE2 is highly expressed in smooth muscle as well as arterial and venous endothelium in virtually all organs, these tissues can be directly targeted by SARS-CoV-2, with induction of endothelial dysfunction. COVID-19–associated hypoxia resulting from pulmonary dysfunction leads to reduced blood flow and vasoconstriction, which also contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, the excessive production of pro-inflammatory mediators leads to an imbalance between the amount of pro- vs. anti-coagulant factors and induction of platelet aggregation. An increase in levels of thrombin, tissue factor V and VIII, and fibrinogen, alongside NET formation, results in a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of systemic macro- and micro-thrombosis. Indeed, fibrinous exudates and thrombi have been observed in histopathological specimens obtained from individuals with COVID-19. Therefore, laboratory monitoring of D-dimer levels, fibrinogen, platelet count and prothrombin time is crucial in all hospitalized and severe cases of COVID-19.

An increased incidence of cardiovascular complications has been observed in severe COVID-19, with a high incidence of clinical symptoms of heart disease (palpitations and chest tightness), elevated cardiac biomarker levels tests (especially cardiac troponin I or T), and abnormalities in electro- or echocardiography. In autopsy series of COVID-19 cases, most patients were found to have cardiomegaly, right ventricular dilatation, and mild fibrosis. The heart may be susceptible to direct SARS-CoV-2–mediated cytotoxicity, as ACE2 is highly expressed in cardiomyocytes. Nevertheless, single-cell RNA sequencing has demonstrated that pericytes express higher levels of ACE2 than cardiomyocytes, and thus may also be targeted by SARS-CoV-2, leading to capillary endothelial dysfunction upon viral infection. Heterozygosis for loss of ACE2 activity is believed to be sufficient to increase the risk of heart disease. The role of circulating soluble ACE2 is not well understood, but its levels are significantly increased in the presence of cardiovascular dysfunction and/or SARS-CoV-2 infection, and may be used as a biomarker. Furthermore, cytokine storm, compounded by a hypoxic state resulting from pulmonary dysfunction, may lead to direct myocardial injury. Early acute myocardial injury has been associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. Pre-existing cardiovascular diseases have also been associated with a worse prognosis, as COVID-19 may aggravate cardiac tissue injury and dysfunction. Monitoring of cardiac function and standard biomarkers is recommended.

Urogenital System

A balance between the effects of ACE2/Ang (1-7) and Ang II is tightly regulated to maintain normal kidney function. As ACE2 is expressed in kidney tissue, mainly in the brush border of the proximal cells, these cells are susceptible to direct injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Laboratory tests have frequently revealed evidence of kidney dysfunction in individuals with COVID-19, including proteinuria, hematuria, and elevated levels of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen. Renal abnormalities suggestive of inflammation and edema have also been observed on computed tomography. COVID-19–induced acute kidney injury has been associated with a markedly elevated risk of in-hospital mortality—approximately 5 times higher than that of COVID-19 patients without acute kidney injury. A substantial number of individuals who develop COVID-19–induced acute kidney injury also require dialysis. SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens have been found in urine and in kidney tissue, mainly tubular epithelial cells and podocytes, at autopsy; histopathological studies showed diffuse tubular injury with loss of brush border integrity, vacuolar degeneration, and necrosis. Intraluminal erythrocyte aggregation in capillaries, without the presence of fibrinoid material, has also been reported. The potential for direct viral damage to the kidney notwithstanding, inflammation and antiviral agents can also induce nephrotoxicity; therefore, kidney biomarkers and fluid and electrolyte status should be closely monitored to prevent kidney injury.

Despite a similar prevalence across genders, a higher case fatality rate has been observed in men with COVID-19, regardless of age. It is worth noting that testicular and vas deferens cells have a much higher expression of ACE2 than ovaries, which could partially explain differences in disease severity and, consequently, fatality. Furthermore, sex-chromosome genes and sex hormones may contribute to the differential regulation of immunological responses between genders. A high density of immune-related genes is located on the X chromosome, as is ACE2. This functional mosaic could influence innate and adaptive immune responses or disease severity. In this context, women have been found to mount a more robust T-cell activation response than men during SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may contribute to a more efficient virus clearance.

Gastrointestinal System

A considerable proportion of patients with COVID-19 present with abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause gastrointestinal dysfunction. Indeed, ACE2 is abundantly expressed in the luminal surface of intestinal epithelial cells, where it acts as a co-receptor for amino acid uptake. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein has been found along multiple gastrointestinal structures, as well as in stool specimens, which suggests that oral-fecal transmission might occur. Diffuse endothelial inflammation of the small intestine and mesenteric ischemia were observed in histopathological examination of COVID-19 cases. Although gastrointestinal symptoms have not been associated with increased risk of mortality, they appear to correlate with a longer duration of illness. Furthermore, altered liver function tests have been observed in several individuals with COVID-19, including elevated levels of transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase), total bilirubin, and γ-glutamyl transferase. At autopsy, mild lobular infiltration by lymphocytes, central sinusoidal dilation, and patchy necrosis of the liver were reported in a case series of COVID-19. Kupffer cell proliferation and chronic hepatic congestion were also observed in another case series. As cholangiocytes express ACE2, they are susceptible to direct virus-induced cytotoxicity. However, it remains unclear whether liver injury in COVID-19 is due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, systemic inflammation, drug-related, or multifactorial. As most drugs under investigation as therapies for COVID-19 are metabolized in the liver, its function should be monitored periodically.

Nervous System

Clinical manifestations consistent with neurological dysfunction, such as headache, confusion, and sudden loss of olfaction and gustation, as well as visual impairment, have been reported with increasing frequency in cases of COVID-19. As ACE2 is expressed in olfactory bulb cells, neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, the virus may rapidly disseminate through important brain areas once the olfactory epithelium is infected. SARS-CoV-2 may also infect the cerebral vascular endothelium and cross the blood–brain barrier via infected leukocytes, thus migrating into the central nervous system. Although no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in a first report of brain autopsies, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in cerebrospinal fluid has been reported in patients with meningoencephalitis, suggesting that neurological manifestations might be due to direct invasion by SARS-CoV-2. An autopsy series also reported cerebral edema and partial neuronal degeneration in individuals with COVID-19. Further evidence of SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism has been observed in other autopsies of COVID-19 cases, with such manifestations as lymphocytic encephalitis, meningitis, and massive intracranial hemorrhage. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection of the brainstem may be at least partially responsible for respiratory and cardiovascular failure.

Potential Therapeutic Approaches

The identification of similarities among human coronaviruses has provided some clues for the development of effective therapies (Table 1), especially for specific vaccines or effective antivirals against SARS-CoV-2. Several therapeutic approaches are under experimental and clinical investigation for COVID-19, but most are existing drugs approved for other disease indications. At least 66 human proteins or host factors can be targeted by clinically approved drugs in order to potentially inhibit SARS-CoV-2/host cell interactions. Drug repurposing offers an advantage, as these drugs are already available in the clinic and have undergone extensive toxicological studies before marketing approval. Therefore, the time frame to acquire an indication for COVID-19 may be reduced if safety and efficacy are demonstrated in late-stage clinical trials. Nevertheless, as COVID-19 is a multifaceted disease, multi-target therapeutic approaches are required to reduce or even prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and its downstream effects—namely, systemic inflammation and multiple organ injury. To date, over 4,000 clinical trials of COVID-19 therapies have been registered in the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Platform4 (Figure 7). In this section, we collected a wide number of therapeutics under investigations and some that, despite being extensively evaluated in the clinic, demonstrated no efficacy against COVID-19.

Vaccine Development

The best long-term strategy to stop SARS-CoV-2 transmission and prevent new infections is the development of an effective vaccine. There are many efforts in progress from both the scientific community and the pharmaceutical industry to develop vaccines against SARS-CoV-2; the current pipeline has over 200 candidates, of which 45 are in clinical trials and five have received interim or conditional approval for emergency use in different countries. These include the traditional inactivated and attenuated vaccines, as well as novel DNA- and RNA-based vaccines. Major advantages and limitations of each vaccine type have been discussed in detail elsewhere. Among these, five have demonstrated promising results in preliminary phase III trials (Table 2). AZD1222 (formerly ChAdOx1-S, from Oxford/AstraZeneca) is a non-replicating viral vector vaccine comprising the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that has demonstrated protective effects in rhesus macaques after a single dose, and 62–90% efficacy when given in two-dose regimen in humans. Vaccines developed by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech (mRNA-based vaccines), Gamaleya (recombinant viral vector-based vaccine), and Sinovac (inactivated viral-based vaccine) were also reported to have high efficacy. The importance of vaccine development notwithstanding, alternative therapeutic approaches are being concomitantly investigated to identify effective therapies against COVID-19 with the necessary urgency.

TMPRSS2 Inhibitors

Camostat mesilate (FoipanTM) is a serine protease inhibitor clinically approved for squamous cell carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis in Japan. It significantly reduces viral load of SARS-CoV, human coronavirus NL63, and SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by partially blocking TMPRSS2 activity. Nafamostat mesilate (BuipelTM) is another serine protease inhibitor used in Japan that has been demonstrated to inhibit MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells by targeting TMPRSS2. Nafamostat was even more effective at inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro than camostat. Furthermore, nafamostat is approved for disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan due to its anticoagulant properties, which is an additional advantage for the treatment of COVID-19, given the high prevalence of coagulation disturbances described above.

Cathepsin Inhibitors

In vitro studies demonstrated that E64d, a non-selective cysteinyl cathepsin inhibitor, was able to limit both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection in human epithelial cells, while the combination of E64d with a TMPRSS2 inhibitor completely abrogated viral entry. The investigational compound K11777 and three of its analogs demonstrated strong antiviral activity against SARS-CoV pseudotypes in vitro. Oxocarbazate was also effective at inhibiting SARS-CoV and Ebola virus entry into cells. These agents, all cathepsin inhibitors, have potential therapeutic utility in COVID-19.

RAAS Modulators

Some concerns have been raised regarding the long-term use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (e.g., captopril, losartan) for individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic, as these drugs might upregulate ACE2 and could theoretically enhance susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. However, multiple studies have found no correlation between use of RAAS inhibitors and likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, nor with COVID-19 severity in those infected. In fact, in a retrospective study, a reduction in COVID-19–related mortality was observed in hospitalized individuals with hypertension who had been treated with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers compared to those not using any of these drugs. Furthermore, abrupt discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors in individuals with cardiovascular disease and on long-term therapy is not recommended, as it may cause clinical decompensation. Based on the protective role of ACE2 as a counter-regulator of Ang II/AT1-R effects, therapeutic approaches that restore the balance between ACE and ACE2 would be ideal to mitigate COVID-19–induced multiple organ injury in individuals without pre-existing medical conditions, preferably in combination with an effective antiviral agent.

Recombinant Soluble ACE2 and Human Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies

It has been proposed that a recombinant soluble form of ACE2 (rhACE2), administered exogenously, may competitively bind to the SARS-CoV-2 RBD and thus prevent its interaction with native ACE2 for host-cell entry. Such an approach not only would neutralize the virus but also preserve ACE2 activity, thus protecting lung and cardiovascular tissues from injury. In a pilot study, one rhACE2 formulation (known as GSK2586881) demonstrated no safety concerns and was able to decrease levels of Ang II with a trend toward decreasing IL-6 levels in serum. This rhACE2 also inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection in both engineered human blood vessels and kidney organoids in vitro. A clinical trial is ongoing to evaluate the effects of rhACE2 in individuals with COVID-19 (NCT04335136). Alternatively, CR3022 is a SARS-CoV-specific human monoclonal antibody that was able to bind to SARS-CoV-2 RBD and neutralize viral actions. CR3022 may be a promising candidate to prevent or significantly reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection. A monoclonal antibody obtained from B-cells of individuals recently recovered from COVID-19 has also demonstrated ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ACE2 interactions.

Antiviral Drugs

An ideal antiviral agent should target factors that are highly conserved among coronaviruses and essential for viral pathogenesis. A number of antivirals under investigation for COVID-19 are nucleoside analogs used for other viruses. These molecules are incorporated into nascent DNA/RNA chains during viral replication, and lead to premature termination of nucleic acid synthesis or insertion of mutations in the viral genome that prevent subsequent viral replication. Ribavirin is a guanosine analog used for the treatment of hepatitis C virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and certain viral hemorrhagic fevers. A recent in vitro study demonstrated that high-dose ribavirin can reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection. It was also tested with and without IFN-α in individuals infected with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, but whether it has any therapeutic benefit remains controversial. Severe adverse effects were also reported, including hepatotoxicity and hemolysis.

Favipiravir (AviganTM) is another guanosine analog that selectively inhibits the influenza viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). It has been approved against influenza virus but also demonstrated antiviral activity against Ebola virus, yellow fever virus, and other viruses in experimental models. As with ribavirin, a high dose of favipiravir was able to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. In an early clinical study, favipiravir demonstrated better clinical outcomes compared to umifenovir (see below), with a significant decrease in fever and cough in individuals with COVID-19. In a similar study, favipiravir therapy was associated with a shorter time to viral clearance and higher improvement rate in chest imaging of individuals with COVID-19, resulting in extension of its approved indications by the National Medical Products Administration of China.

Remdesivir (VekluryTM) is an adenosine analog with a broad spectrum of antiviral activity against several RNA viruses. It blocks RdRp, thus preventing an early step of viral replication. Remdesivir has been shown to inhibit viral replication of Ebola virus, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 in experimental studies, with higher efficacy compared to other antiviral agents. Furthermore, it demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile compared to placebo in early-stage clinical study in individuals with severe COVID-19. In a compassionate-use setting, remdesivir was used in hospitalized individuals with severe COVID-19 and 68% of the cohort demonstrated an improvement in oxygen-support class and 25% were discharged during 18 days follow-up. In phase III multicenter randomized clinical trials, remdesivir appeared to shorten the recovery time of some patients, although therapeutic benefits were not clearly demonstrated in terms of reducing fatality rate of individuals with severe COVID-19. Despite its inefficiency in improving survival, final reports of the multicenter clinical trial indicated that remdesivir might shorten the time to recovery of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and reduce lower respiratory tract infection, which culminated in its FDA approval.

Besides nucleoside analogs, antiviral agents may block viral replication through distinct mechanisms, including inhibition of endosomal acidification and inhibition of proteases essential for intracellular assembly. The fixed-dose combination lopinavir/ritonavir (KaletraTM) is an FDA-approved therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Lopinavir is an inhibitor of HIV-1 protease, while ritonavir prevents the rapid metabolism of lopinavir by inhibiting CYP3A isoenzymes. This combination has demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, reducing viral load in experimental studies, and was associated with modest clinical improvement of MERS in a case report. Furthermore, a milder disease course was observed in individuals infected with SARS-CoV who received lopinavir/ritonavir. Initially, lopinavir/ritonavir appeared to accelerate the recovery process from COVID-19, shortening ICU length of stay compared to standard therapy alone; however, it has since proven unable to reduce viral load or mortality in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Darunavir is a second-generation protease inhibitor used in combination with ritonavir or cobicistat for HIV therapy. It was also considered as a potential therapeutic alternative in COVID-19; however, darunavir demonstrated no antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.

Umifenovir (ArbidolTM) is a dual-acting antiviral/host-targeting agent approved for treatment of influenza in Russia and China. It inhibits membrane fusion of viral envelope and host cell by preventing clathrin-mediated endocytosis and has been demonstrated to prevent in vitro infection with several common pathogenic viruses. In an early clinical study of COVID-19, umifenovir therapy was associated with a trend toward reductions in viral load and mortality rate, albeit not statistically significant. In a retrospective study, most umifenovir-treated individuals demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 negativity and improvement in chest imaging after 14 days of therapy. However, there is no additional evidence to support that umifenovir may improve clinical outcomes of individuals with COVID-19.

Two investigational antiviral drug candidates (11a and 11b) have been developed by structure-based design methods to target 3CL protease (Mpro), the main SARS-CoV-2 protease. Both demonstrated good pharmacokinetic properties and low toxicity and were able to significantly reduce viral load in vitro. Further development is ongoing.

Despite some promising results in experimental and early clinical studies, large-scale randomized trials are still in progress and their results on safety and efficacy will provide a better guidance for the potential use of these drugs in the treatment of COVID-19.

Other Anti-infectives

Ivermectin and nitazoxanide are two clinically approved antiparasitic agents that have demonstrated significant antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. A recent study confirmed that early administration of nitazoxanide (1-3 days after onset of symptoms) reduced the viral load in individuals with mild COVID-19 with a good safety profile, even though more studies are required to evaluate its efficacy in individuals with both mild and severe COVID-19. Clinical safety and efficacy of ivermectin in COVID-19 have yet to be confirmed.

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are aminoquinoline antimalarials also used in the treatment of several autoimmune diseases. Both drugs have demonstrated a broad spectrum of antiviral activity in vitro—including against coronaviruses—through various mechanisms, such as blocking ACE2 terminal glycosylation and hindering endosome–lysosome fusion. In early clinical studies, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were suggested to reduce viral load and improve clinical outcomes in individuals with COVID-19 with an even better effect when combined with azithromycin. However, such findings were not confirmed in later, well-designed clinical trials; both chloroquine and its hydroxy analog appear ineffective, whether used therapeutically or for postexposure prophylaxis, with conflicting evidence regarding their safety and toxicity.

Convalescent Plasma Therapy

Convalescent plasma (CP) is plasma rich in neutralizing antibodies which has been extracted from individuals who have recovered from an infection. This plasma is processed and then administered to infected individuals. CP has been demonstrated to reduce viral load and improve clinical outcomes in other coronavirus infections, specifically SARS and MERS. In early-stage clinical studies, CP therapy was well tolerated and improved clinical outcomes by neutralizing viremia in severe COVID-19. Improvements in clinical scales as well as discharge and survival rate in individuals with severe COVID-19 were observed 14 days after CP therapy. Several clinical trials of CP are in progress. Based on previous experience with influenza A (H1N1), some practical limitations may apply, and should be borne in mind when seeking to implement an effective CP therapy regimen for COVID-19. These limitations have been discussed elsewhere. Antibodies produced in humanized mouse or equine serum have been investigated as alternative strategies to neutralized SARS-CoV-2 with some promising results – up to 100 times more potent than convalescent plasma from COVID-19-recovered individuals.

IL-6 Inhibitors

IL-6 is acutely induced by inflammatory stimuli and mediates a number of immune responses. Individuals with COVID-19 demonstrate an increase in serum levels of IL-6 within 3 days after disease onset, with even higher levels in severe cases compared to mild ones. A further increase in IL-6 levels has also been associated with increased risk of respiratory failure and death.

Tocilizumab (ActemraTM) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits IL-6 receptor activity. It is indicated for the treatment of autoimmune disorders and cytokine release syndrome and has been suggested as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19-induced hyperinflammation. In early clinical studies, tocilizumab significantly improved several outcomes in severe and critical COVID-19 cases, including supplemental oxygen utilization and C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels. In a subsequent study, tocilizumab therapy was associated with clinical improvements, as well as rapid and sustained benefits in ICU and non-ICU patients with COVID-19. Alternatively, siltuximab (SylvantTM) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that directly bind to IL-6. Siltuximab provides an advantage compared to tocilizumab as it neutralizes circulating IL-6, which could contribute to neurotoxic effects. In an early clinical study, siltuximab therapy at the onset of mechanical ventilation was associated with reduced occurrence of respiratory failure and death in severe COVID-19 cases. Sarilumab is another IL-6R inhibitor that appears to be a potential therapy against severe COVID-19.

IL-1 Inhibitors

The ORF3a protein of coronaviruses can activate NF-κB signaling and the NLRP3 inflammasome. The inflammasome activates cleavage of pro-IL-1β by caspase-1 into active IL-1β, which mediates lung inflammation and fibrosis. Anakinra (KineretTM), a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, was evaluated in individuals with severe COVID-19 and demonstrated effective reductions in need for mechanical ventilation and fatality rate in an early clinical study. A retrospective study also indicated that high-dose anakinra was safe and associated with clinical improvements in over 70% of individuals with severe COVID-19. At least 10 additional clinical trials are ongoing with the aim of evaluating the effects of anakinra in targeting hyperinflammation in COVID-19. Colchicine is another drug known to reduce neutrophil recruitment and IL-1β levels, and widely used for the treatment of gout. In hospitalized individuals with COVID-19, colchicine did not affect C-reactive protein or cardiac troponin levels, although an improved time to clinical deterioration was reported.

Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) Inhibitors

Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway appears to be a promising approach, given its role in cytokine receptors on immune cells. JAK/STAT inhibitors have also been used for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome. Several clinical trials evaluating the effects of JAK/STAT inhibitors for COVID-19 are ongoing. Fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor, has been hypothesized to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 and Th17-induced inflammation without modulating IFN signaling, but efficacy remains to be investigated. In a recent clinical study of individuals with COVID-19, ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, was not significantly superior to placebo in terms of clinical parameters, although faster recovery from lymphopenia was observed. On the other hand, baricitinib, a high-affinity JAK1/2 inhibitor, has been shown to improve some clinical and laboratory parameters (including C-reactive protein levels) in a pilot study of COVID-19 cases.

Corticosteroids

There is some controversy regarding corticosteroid therapy in COVID-19. Although corticosteroids are widely used to suppress lung inflammation, they were associated with delayed viral clearance and no improvement in fatality rate during the SARS and MERS epidemics. Nevertheless, methylprednisolone therapy has been shown to improve chest imaging, reduce fatality rate, and shorten hospital stay in individuals with severe COVID-19.

Recent preliminary results of low-dose dexamethasone therapy also demonstrated a significant reduction in fatality rate (up to one-third) in critically ill individuals with COVID-19, although such benefits were not observed for the cohort of individuals who did not require oxygen therapy at admission. It is possible that corticosteroid therapy may be beneficial in certain phases of COVID-19, such as the hyperinflammatory stage, but certainly should be combined with an effective antiviral or antibiotic agent to reduce the risk of superinfection. Further clinical studies are necessary to better understand the effects of corticosteroid therapy in COVID-19.

Adjuvant Therapy

Unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin has been used prophylactically in hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 to prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Heparin can also induce immunomodulatory effects and protect endothelial cells from oxidative stress, thus preventing increased vascular permeability, microthrombus formation, and leukocyte extravasation. In an observational study, anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin was associated with better prognosis in severe COVID-19 cases with high levels of D-dimer. Despite current recommendations for the prophylactic use of low-molecular-weight heparin in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients (except those with contraindications), individuals admitted to the ICU remain at high risk of pulmonary embolism.

The use of recombinant human DNase (dornase) to disrupt NETs has been proposed, as SARS-CoV-2 was found to induce excessive production of NETs, which may contribute to thromboembolism events, cytokine storm, and tissue injury. Dornase alfa (PulmozymeTM) has been long used as an inhalation solution for mucus clearance in individuals with cystic fibrosis; however, its effects on COVID-19 remain to be investigated. Bevacizumab (AvastinTM/ZaribevTM) is an anti-VEGF humanized monoclonal antibody that has been investigated to reduce lung edema in COVID-19. Finally, mepolizumab (NucalaTM), an anti-CD147 humanized antibody used for the treatment of severe asthma, demonstrated to improve the recovery of individuals with COVID-19-induced severe pneumonia in a small-scale clinical study.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cell (MSC)-Based Therapies

Mesenchymal stromal cells and their biologically active products, such as extracellular vesicles, are known to induce immunomodulatory and reparative effects, reducing lung and distal organ injury and improving survival in several preclinical models of ARDS and sepsis. In early clinical studies, MSC administration was well tolerated and caused no obvious safety concerns in critically ill individuals. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 is unable to infect MSCs, as these cells do not express ACE2. In one case report of compassionate use in severe COVID-19, administration of Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs reduced plasma levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and C-reactive protein and improved lung function. In another early clinical study, bone marrow-derived MSCs were administered intravenously to seven individuals with severe COVID-19. MSC administration was safe and significantly reduced inflammation, resulting in improvements in symptoms and lung function. Alternatively, administration of bone marrow MSC-derived exosomes was evaluated in an early clinical study of individuals with severe COVID-19 and demonstrated no adverse events. Several other clinical trials are evaluating MSC-based therapies for COVID-19. Despite the great promise of MSCs for the treatment of COVID-19 complications, such as ARDS and sepsis, several open questions remain, including the best source, dose, route of administration, frequency, and timing. Further understanding of the effects of MSCs on COVID-19 pathogenesis and their underlying mechanisms are also needed in order to translate MSC-based therapy into clinical practice with safety and effectiveness.

Outlook and Considerations

COVID-19 can cause not only severe lung injury but also multiple organ dysfunction with potential long-term effects on survivors. The downregulation of membrane-bound active ACE2 induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection can be detrimental to everyone, but is particular so for individuals whose baseline ACE2 expression is already deficient. Although infected individuals with certain pre-existing medical conditions are more prone to developing severe COVID-19, the disease is not exclusively restricted to this population, and a combination of multiple direct and indirect pathogenic factors contribute to disease severity and a broad spectrum of phenotypes. Even though vaccination has initiated in multiple countries, the production of vaccines on a global scale will take some time, despite having different vaccines approved against SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, implementation of preventive measures remains crucial to limit rapid dissemination of the virus and potential COVID-19-induced organ injuries, as well as prevent saturation of national healthcare systems.

It is imperative to continuously monitor genetic modifications of coronaviruses, as any gain-of-function mutation affecting the life-cycle pathways of SARS-CoV-2 (and other viruses in this family) can make them more infectious and lethal to humans. In this context, a SARS-CoV-2 subtype with the D614G mutation in the spike protein was recently found to confer increased infectivity; further investigations are ongoing to elucidate the lethality rate of this and other subtypes. More strict regulations against the trade of wild animals for domestication or food should also be implemented to prevent potential future pandemics.

Over the last two decades, we have witnessed three coronavirus outbreaks. The unprecedented consequences of COVID-19 pandemic have prompted a massive global research effort to better understand the pathological mechanisms underlying SARS-CoV-2 infection and—at an accelerated pace—develop safe and efficient therapies against this devastating condition. Although a number of these therapies have demonstrated promising results in early clinical studies, safety and efficacy remain to be demonstrated in large-scale clinical trials. A greater understanding of the clinical features has provided better guidance in managing the disease to prevent further complications. Furthermore, the phenotypical differences in COVID-19 manifestations suggest that personalized therapeutic regimens should be considered on a case-by-case basis, ranging from prevention of viral cell entry and replication to supportive, immunomodulatory and tissue reparative approaches. Therefore, multi-target therapeutic protocols may be the best option to achieve a higher number of individuals with severe COVID-19 and significantly reduce or even prevent multiple organ dysfunction.

Author Contributions

ML-P contributed to the design and conceptualization, original draft, editing, and review for intellectual content. PS, FC, DB, CR, PP, MM, and CCN reviewed the intellectual content. PR did the conceptualization and edited and reviewed the intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 236

  1. 1.

    Ackermann M. Verleden S. E. Kuehnel M. Haverich A. Welte T. Laenger F. (2020 ). Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19. N. Eng. J. Med. 383 120–128.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2015432

  2. 2.

    Andersen K. G. Rambaut A. Lipkin W. I. Holmes E. C. Garry R. F. (2020 ). The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26 450–452.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9

  3. 3.

    Arabi Y. M. Shalhoub S. Mandourah Y. Al-Hammed F. Al-Omari A. Al Qasim E. (2020 ). Ribavirin and Interferon Therapy for Critically Ill Patients with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Multicenter Observation Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 70 1837–1844.

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciz544

  4. 4.

    Badgujar K. C. Badgujar V. C. Badgujar S. B. (2020 ). Vaccine development agains coronavirus (2003 to present): An orverview, recent advances, current scenario, opportunities and challenges. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 14 1361–1376.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.022

  5. 5.

    Barnes N. J. Adrover J. M. Baxter-Stoltzfus A. Borczuk A. Cools-Lartigue J. Crawford J. M. (2020 ). Targeting Potential Driver of COVID-19: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. J. Exp. Med. 217:e20200652.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20200652

  6. 6.

    Battaglini D. Robba C. Ball L. Cruz F. F. Silva P. L. Pelosi P. (2020 ). Emerging therapies for COVID-19 pneumonia. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 29 633–637.

    Not in our library10.1080/13543784.2020.1771694

  7. 7.

    Beigel J. H. Tomashek K. D. Dodd L. E. Mehta A. K. Zingman B. S. Kalil A. C. (2020 ). Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 – Final Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 383 1813–1826.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2007764

  8. 8.

    Bhattacharyya C. Das C. Ghosg A. Singh A. K. Mukherjee S. Majumder P. P. (2020 ). Global Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Subtype with Spyke Protein Mutation D614G is Shaped by Human Genomic Variations that Regulate Expression of TMPRSS2 and MXI Genes. bioRxiv 2020:75911

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.04.075911

  9. 9.

    Bian H. Zheng Z.-H. Wei D. Zhang Z. Kang W.-Z. Hao C.-Q. (2020 ). Meplazumab treats COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-labelled, concurrent controlled add-on clinical trial. medRxiv Preprint.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.03.21.20040691

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Boulware D. R. Pullen M. F. Bangdiwala A. S. Pastick K. A. Lofgern S. M. Ofagor E. C. (2020 ). A Randomizes Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19. N. Eng. J. Med. 383 517–525.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2016638

  12. 12.

    Bukowska A. Spiller L. Wolke C. Lendeckel U. Weinert S. Hoffmann J. (2017 ). Protective Regulation of the ACE2/ACE Gene Expression by Estrogen in Human Atrial Tissue from Elderly Men. Exp. Biol. Med. 242 1412–1423.

    Not in our library10.1177/1535370217718808

  13. 13.

    Bunyavanich S. Do A. Vicencio A. (2020 ). Nasal Gene Expression of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Children and Adults. JAMA 323 2427–2429.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.8707

  14. 14.

    Butowt R. Bilinska K. (2020 ). SARS-CoV-2: Olfaction, Brain Infection, and the Urgent Need for Clinical Samples Allowing Earlier Virus Detection. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 11 1200–1203.

    Not in our library10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00172

  15. 15.

    Cai G. (2020 ). Bulk and single-cell transcriptomics identify tobacco-use disparity in lung gene expression of ACE2, the receptor of 2019-nCov. medRxiv Preprint.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.02.05.20020107

  16. 16.

    Cai Q. Yang M. Liu D. Chen J. Shu D. Xia J. (2020 ). Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19: An Open-Label Control Study. Engineering 6 1192–1198.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007

  17. 17.

    Calcagnile M. Forgez P. Iannelli A. Bucci C. Alifano M. Alifano P. (2020 ). ACE2 Polymorphisms and Individual Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Inseghts from an In Silico Study. bioRxiv Preprint.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.23.057042

  18. 18.

    Caly L. Druce J. D. Catton M. G. Jans D. A. Wagstaff K. M. (2020 ). The FDA-approved Drug Ivermectin Inhibits the Replication of SARS-CoV.2 in Vitro. Antiviral Res. 178:104787.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787

  19. 19.

    Cantini F. Niccoli L. Matarrese D. Nicastri E. Stobbione Goletti D. (2020 ). Baracitinib Therapy in COVID-19: A Pilot Study on Safety and Clinical Impact. J. Infect. 81 318–356.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.017

  20. 20.

    Cao B. Wang Y. Wen D. Liu W. Wang J. Fan G. (2020 ). A Trial of Lapinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Several Covid-19. N. Eng. J. Med. 382 1787–1799.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2001282

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Cao Y. Wei J. Zou L. Jiang T. Wang G. Chen L. (2020b ). Ruxolitinib in Treatment of Severe Coronavirus Dosease 2019 (COVID-19): A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 146 137.e–146.e.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.019

  23. 23.

    Cavalcanti A. B. Zampieri F. G. Rosa R. G. Azevedo L. C. P. Veiga V. C. Avezum A. (2020 ). Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19. N. Eng. J. Med. 383 2041–2052.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2019014

  24. 24.

    Cavalli G. de Luca G. Campochiaro C. Della-Torre E. Ripa M. Canetti D. (2020 ). Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2 325–331e.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30127-2

  25. 25.

    Chai X. Hu L. Zhang Y. Han W. Lu Z. Ke A. (2020 ). Specific ACE2 Expression in Cholangiocytes May Cause Liver Damage After 2019-nCov Infection. bioRxiv Preprint.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.02.03.931766

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Chan J. F.-W. Yao Y. Yeung M.-L. Deng W. Bao L. Jia L. (2015 ). Treatment with Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Interferon-β1b Outcome of MERS-CoV Infection in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Common Marmoset. J. Infect. Dis. 212 1904–1913.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiv392

  28. 28.

    Channappanavar R. Zhao J. Perlman S. (2014 ). T Cell-Mediated Immune Response to Respiratory Coronaviruses. Immunol. Res. 59 118–128.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12026-014-8534-z

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Chen L. Li X. Chen M. Feng Y. Xiong C. (2020 ). The ACE2 Expression in Human Heart Indicates New Potential Mechanism of Heart Injury Among Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 116 1097–1100.

    Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvaa078

  31. 31.

    Chen N. Zhou M. Dong X. Qu J. Gong F. Han Y. (2020 ). Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of 99 Cases of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A Descriptive Study. Lancet 395 507–513.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7

  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Cheng Y. Cheng G. Chui C. H. Lau F. Y. Chan P. K. S. Ng M. H. L. (2005a ). ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA 293 1450–1451.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.293.12.1450-c

  36. 36.

    Cheng Y. Luo R. Wang K. Zhang M. Wang Z. Dong L. (2020 ). Kidney impairment is associated with in-hospital death of COVID-19 patients. medRxiv Preprint.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.02.18.20023242

  37. 37.

    Cheng Y. Wong R. Soo Y. O. Y. Wong W. S. Lee C. K. Ng M. H. L. (2005b ). Use of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in SARS Patients in Hong Kong. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 24 44–46.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10096-004-1271-9

  38. 38.

    Chu C. M. Cheng V. C. C. Hung I. F. N. Wong M. M. L. Chan K. H. Kao R. Y. T. (2004 ). Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the Treatment of SARS: Initial Virological and Clinical Findings. Thorax 59 252–256.

    Not in our library10.1136/thorax.2003.012658

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Coutard B. Valle C. de Lamballerie X. Canard B. Seidah N. G. Decroly E. (2020 ). The Spike Glycoprotein of the New Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Contains a Furin-Like Clevage Site Absent in Cov of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176:104742.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742

All 236 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.