Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during short-term concurrent training.

Jackson J Fyfe, Jonathan D Bartlett, Jonathan D Bartlett and 4 more

Frontiers in Physiology · 2016

doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00487 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

We determined the effect of concurrent training incorporating either high-intensity interval training (HIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on maximal strength, counter-movement jump (CMJ) performance, and body composition adaptations, compared with single-mode resistance training (RT). Twenty-three recreationally-active males (mean ± SD: age, 29.6 ± 5.5 y; V ̇O 2peak, 44 ± 11 mL∙kg-1•min-1) were ranked by one-repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press strength and randomly allocated tounderwent 8 weeks (3 sessions•wk-1) of either: 1) HIT combined with RT (HIT+RT group, n=8), 2) work-matched MICT combined with RT (MICT+RT group, n=7), or 3) RT performed alone (RT group, n=8). Measures of aerobic capacity, maximal (1-RM) strength, counter-movement jump (CMJ) performance and body composition (DXA) were obtained before (PRE), mid-way (MID), and after (POST) eight weeks of training. Maximal (one-repetition maximum [1-RM]) leg press strength was improved from PRE to POST for RT (mean change ±90% confidence interval; 38.5 ±8.5%; effect size [ES] ±90% confidence interval; 1.26 ±0.24; P<0.001), HIT+RT (28.7 ±5.3%; ES, 1.17 ±0.19; P<0.001) and MICT+RT (27.5 ±4.6%, ES, 0.81 ±0.12; P<0.001); however, the magnitude of this change was greater for RT vs. both HIT+RT (7.4 ±8.7%; ES, 0.40 ±0.40) and MICT+RT (8.2 ±9.9%; ES, 0.60 ±0.45). There were no substantial between-group differences in 1-RM bench press strength gain. RT induced greater changes in peak CMJ force vs. HIT+RT (6.8 ±4.5%; ES, 0.41 ±0.28) and MICT+RT (9.9 ±11.2%; ES, 0.54 ±0.65), and greater improvements in maximal CMJ rate of force development (RFD) vs. HIT+RT (24.1 ±26.1%; ES, 0.72 ±0.88). Lower-body lean mass was similarly increased for RT (4.1 ±2.0%; ES; 0.33 ±0.16; P=0.023) and MICT+RT (3.6 ±2.4%; ES; 0.45 ±0.30; P=0.052); however, this change was attenuated for HIT+RT (1.8 ±1.6%; ES; 0.13 ±0.12; P=0.069). We conclude that concurrent training incorporating either HIT or work-matched MICT similarly attenuates improvements in maximal lower-body strength and indices of CMJ performance compared with RT performed alone. This suggests endurance training intensity is not a critical mediator of interference to maximal strength gain during short-term concurrent training.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.