Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Antibiotic action and resistance: updated review of mechanisms, spread, influencing factors, and alternative approaches for combating resistance

Esraa M. Halawa, Mohamed Fadel, Mohammed W. Al-Rabia and 8 more

Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2024 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1305294

Abstract

Antibiotics represent a frequently employed therapeutic modality for the management of bacterial infections across diverse domains, including human health, agriculture, livestock breeding, and fish farming. The efficacy of antibiotics relies on four distinct mechanisms of action, which are discussed in detail in this review, along with accompanying diagrammatic illustrations. Despite their effectiveness, antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant challenge to treating bacterial infections. Bacteria have developed defense mechanisms against antibiotics, rendering them ineffective. This review delves into the specific mechanisms that bacteria have developed to resist antibiotics, with the help of diagrammatic illustrations. Antibiotic resistance can spread among bacteria through various routes, resulting in previously susceptible bacteria becoming antibiotic-resistant. Multiple factors contribute to the worsening crisis of antibiotic resistance, including human misuse of antibiotics. This review also emphasizes alternative solutions proposed to mitigate the exacerbation of antibiotic resistance.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1 Introduction

Microbiology originated the term “antibiotic” from the French words “antibiose” and “antibiotique,” as defined by Vuillemin in the late 19th century to delineate substances that exert detrimental effects on living organisms, particularly microorganisms. Subsequently, in 1947, Selman A. Waksman provided an all-encompassing definition of antibiotics as chemical compounds produced by microorganisms that possess the capacity to impede the growth and induce the demise of bacteria and other microorganisms. Antibiotics have found widespread application across various sectors, encompassing human health, agriculture, livestock breeding, and fish farms. The mechanisms underlying the efficacy of antibiotics involve four distinct modes of action, including inhibition of DNA replication, protein biosynthesis, cell wall biosynthesis, and folic acid metabolism (Saverus 2019). However, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has escalated into a critical global issue.

This review article comprehensively discusses the multifaceted factors contributing to the propagation of antibiotic resistance, alongside providing potential strategies for mitigating this problem. Furthermore, innovative solutions to combat antibiotic resistance have been uncovered by scientists, such as the utilization of nanoantibiotics, and antibiotic adjuvants, the discovery of novel antibiotics, and the exploration of alternatives to antibiotics, including bacteriophages and botanicals. In addition to exploring the aforementioned topics, this review article delves into the utilization of antibiotics in diverse sectors, the controversies encircling their use, the mechanisms by which antibiotics act, the emergence of antibiotic resistance, the mechanisms governing antibiotic resistance in bacteria, the dissemination of resistance among bacterial populations, and the pivotal factors that contribute to the escalation of resistance. Moreover, this article highlights the accomplishments achieved thus far and presents solutions that scientists have uncovered to combat the global crisis of antibiotic resistance.

2 Antibiotics use

Antibiotics are utilized in a variety of sectors, including agriculture, aquaculture, animal husbandry, and human health (Table 1). These substances are used to treat bacterial infections in humans, animals, and crops, thereby preventing crop loss from bacterial diseases. Additionally, antibiotics are widely used as growth-promoting agents in animal husbandry. The utilization of antibiotics in livestock is classified into three categories by scientists: therapeutic agents, prophylactic agents, and growth promoters. Therapeutic agents are administered in high doses to infected animals to treat illnesses, while prophylactic agents are given in sub-therapeutic doses through feed or drinking water to prevent disease when there are no evident symptoms of infection. Antibiotics are periodically administered to animals throughout their life cycle (Greene and Pisano 2012). Growth promoters are used to improve an animal’s growth rate and production, and a tiny quantity of antibiotics is regularly administered through its feed. In aquaculture, antimicrobial substances are used to treat fish infections. Fish are given antibiotics by incorporating them into specially formulated feed, and they mostly excrete them into the environment. It is worth noting that approximately 75% of the antibiotics provided to fish are excreted into the water.

3 Mechanisms of action of antibiotics

Not all antibiotics have the exact mechanism of action; thus, scientists classify antibiotics according to their mechanism of action and chemical structure into four mechanisms described as follows:

3.1 Antibiotics inhibit DNA replication

Binary fission is a type of cell division used by bacteria that produces two daughter cells. Before that can happen, however, bacteria must create exact duplicates of their circular DNA. DNA replication is the procedure used to duplicate DNA. A DNA double helix strand is split into two single strands by the enzyme DNA helicase to begin this process. The enzyme DNA polymerase then produces new DNA Strands that are complementary to the old ones. Positive DNA helical twists build up as a result of DNA helicase and DNA polymerase activity. If not eliminated, these positive helical twists stop DNA replication from continuing. The removal of the positive superhelical twists is carried out by the enzyme DNA gyrase, also known as topoisomerase II, allowing DNA replication to continue. A crucial bacterial enzyme called DNA gyrase is made up of 2A and 2B subunits. This enzyme also plays a crucial role in the transcription of several genes and the start of DNA replication. Once the new two daughter DNA molecules have been created, they eventually connect and are interlinked. In order to divide the bacterial cell into two new daughter bacterial cells, the enzyme topoisomerase IV (related to DNA gyrase) enables the separation of the two connected DNA molecules (Figure 1).

3.2 Fluoroquinolones antibiotics

By inhibiting the activity of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, fluoroquinolone antibiotics prevent the synthesis of bacterial DNA. These antibiotics have a particular affinity for binding to the complex formed by DNA gyrase and DNA. Such binding destabilizes the enzyme-DNA complex, causing DNA cleavage and ultimately leading to bacterial cell death (Figure 1). Fluoroquinolones primarily target DNA gyrase, which is the reason for their effectiveness against most gram-negative bacteria.

In contrast, in most gram-positive bacteria, fluoroquinolones target topoisomerase IV as their primary mechanism. However, they also act as a secondary target for DNA gyrase. This results in the binding of fluoroquinolones to DNA and the complex formed by topoisomerase IV, which causes disruption of the separation of the two daughter DNA molecules and eventually leads to DNA breakage.

3.3 Antibiotics inhibit protein biosynthesis

Like all other living things, bacteria have DNA, which contains the genetic information for every protein they need to survive. This includes the protein needed for metabolism regulation, growth, repair, and reproduction. Additionally, it encodes for mRNA, rRNA, and tRNA, three types of RNA that are essential for carrying out protein synthesis.

The unwinding and separation of the DNA molecule at a region that codes for the necessary protein to be produced is the first step in the process of protein biosynthesis. The transcription, the process of making mRNA, uses only one strand of DNA as a scaffold. When the mRNA strand is finished, it separates from the DNA template and then is connected to a ribosome. The 50 s and 30 s ribosomal subunits make up the bacterial ribosome. Following the joining of these two subunits along the mRNA strand, the synthesis of the polypeptide chain starts. Up until it encounters the signal along the mRNA to stop, the ribosome keeps adding amino acids to the lengthening polypeptide chain. The full polypeptide chain is generated at this point (Figure 2). Therefore, targeting the ribosomal 30 or 50 subunits is necessary for antibiotics to inhibit protein synthesis.

3.3.1.1 Aminoglycosides antibiotics

Antibiotics known as aminoglycosides function through a specific mechanism. These antibiotics are positively charged, which attracts the negatively charged outer membrane of bacteria, causing the membrane to develop large pores. The aminoglycosides are then able to enter the bacterial cell through these pores. Additionally, aminoglycosides are able to pass through the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane by utilizing the energy of active bacterial transport. The target of aminoglycosides is the 16s rRNA of the 30s, which they bind to via hydrogen bonds. This binding inhibits protein biosynthesis before it can be completed.

Although aminoglycosides are effective against many types of bacteria, they have low efficacy against anaerobic bacteria, as these bacteria require oxygen for active transport pathways to function. However, when combined with an antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis, aminoglycosides have been found to have a greater ability to penetrate bacterial cells at low doses (Figure 2).

3.3.1.2 Tetracycline antibiotics

This class of antibiotics targets the highly conserved sequence of the 16S rRNA present in the ribosomal 30S subunit. Tetracycline, for instance, functions by hindering the binding of tRNA to the A-site of the ribosome, which ultimately impedes the process of protein synthesis.

3.3.2.1 Macrolides antibiotics

Macrolide antibiotics bind to the 50S subunit of the ribosome, thereby preventing the synthesis of polypeptide chains and inhibiting protein production (Figure 2).

3.3.2.2 Chloramphenicol antibiotics

Chloramphenicol antibiotics inhibit peptidyl transferase, an enzyme located on the 50S ribosomal subunit that is necessary for protein synthesis. This inhibition prevents t-RNA from connecting to the ribosomal A site, leading to the inhibition of protein synthesis (Figure 2).

3.3.2.3 Oxazolidinone antibiotics

Oxazolidinone antibiotics prevent the synthesis of the initiation complex by binding to the 50S subunit of the ribosome, thereby preventing the production of proteins (Figure 2).

3.4 Antibiotics inhibit cell wall synthesis

Most bacteria are composed of a cell membrane enclosed in a cell wall, while some bacteria also have an extra outer layer. The bacterial cell wall serves two purposes: to keep the bacteria in their distinctive shape and to stop them from bursting when osmosis is used to introduce fluid into the cell. The peptidoglycan is the most significant part of the cell wall. N-acetyl muramic acid (NAM) alternates with N-acetyl Glucosamine (NAG), and the two are connected by chains of amino acids to form the polymer known as peptidoglycan. There are several steps in the peptidoglycan synthesis process, which ultimately results in bacterial cell wall formation. A precursor to peptidoglycan is created by combining N-acetyl glucosamine (NAG) with N-acetyl muramic acid. The cell wall acceptors in the periplasm receive this peptidoglycan precursor after it has been delivered across the membrane. The peptidoglycan precursors attach to cell wall receptors in the periplasm and go through a lot of cross-linking. Trans peptidase and carboxy peptidase enzymes are the two main enzymes in cross-linking. A cell wall eventually develops from many peptidoglycan layers that are all cross-linked. Gram-positive bacteria may have a thicker cell wall than gram-negative bacteria because they may contain more layers of peptidoglycan (Figure 3).

The peptidoglycan is the most significant part of the bacterial cell wall. Transpeptidase and carboxypeptidase are the two primary enzymes in cross-linking during cell wall biosynthesis (Figure 3).

3.4.1 Betalactams antibiotics

All penicillins and cephalosporins with the beta-lactam ring chemical structure are included in this group. This distinctive structure allows them to attach to peptidoglycan cross-linking enzymes, such as transpeptidase and carboxypeptidase, ultimately inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis and preventing cross-linking. This inhibition of cell wall manufacturing leads to the destruction of the bacterial cell, as shown in Figure 3.

3.4.2 Glycopeptides antibiotics

These antibiotics form non-covalent bonds with the terminal carbohydrates, which prevents the cross-linking of peptidoglycan precursors. This process ultimately leads to the degradation of bacterial cell walls, resulting in the destruction and elimination of bacterial cells.

3.5 Antibiotics inhibit folic acid metabolism

These antibiotics are designed to selectively inhibit a key enzyme involved in the pathway for folic acid metabolism. Sulfonamide antibiotics target dihydropteroate synthase, an enzyme in the metabolic pathway. On the other hand, trimethoprim antibiotics target dihydrofolate reductase, another enzyme in the same pathway (Figure 4).

4 Emergence of antibiotic resistance

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, CEO of the World Health Organization (WHO), has warned that the global epidemic of antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat to a century of progress in healthcare and the achievement of sustainable development goals. According to current predictions, it is expected that in a quarter of a century, almost 100% of bacteria will be resistant to most antibiotics used in medicine. Experts also predict that the number of deaths due to antimicrobial resistance may rise to 10 million by the middle of the twenty-first century, up from the current figure of over 700,000 per year.

In response to this alarming situation, the WHO proposed the ranking of bacteria with the highest trend in resistance in 2017. This list includes Acinobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecium, Helicobacter pylori, Salmonella species, Campylobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Nisseria gonorrhoeae. These microbe species are highly resistant to multiple classes of antibiotic treatments, making them less susceptible to antibiotic therapy.

5 Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance

Bacteria employ three primary mechanisms to counteract the effects of antibiotics. These mechanisms are outlined below:

5.1.1 Through limiting the entrance of drugs into bacterial cells

Gram-negative bacteria have porin channels in their outer membrane. These channels act as gatekeepers, allowing only certain antibiotics like B-lactams and quinolones to enter the bacterial cell. Therefore, the reduced number of bacterial porins can hinder the entry of these antibiotics into the cell, leading to increased resistance to these drugs (Figure 5).

5.1.2 Increasing the rate at which antibiotics leave bacterial cells

Efflux pumps, located in the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria, play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of solutes within bacterial cells. However, these pumps also contribute to antibiotic resistance by removing drugs from bacterial cells before they can reach their intended targets (Figure 6). Notably, efflux systems have been found to confer resistance. to all antibiotic classes except for polymyxin. Increasing our understanding of the mechanisms underlying efflux systems may provide new strategies for combating antibiotic resistance.

5.2 Bacteria modify the target molecule of antibiotics

Antibiotics are designed to target specific molecules, but even the slightest alteration can prevent their binding, leading to the emergence of antibiotic resistance.

5.2.1 Modifications to the ribosomal 30s or 50s subunits

One-way bacteria can develop resistance to drugs that affect protein production is by modifying their ribosomal 30S or 50S subunits (Figure 7). This type of resistance is observed with antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, tetracycline, macrolides, chloramphenicol, lincosamides, and streptogramin.

5.2.2 Changes in penicillin-binding protein (PBP)

Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are enzymes known as transpeptidases, which play a vital role in cross-linking peptidoglycan precursors during the biosynthesis of bacterial cell walls. As these enzymes are the primary targets of β-lactam antibiotics, any changes in their structure or function can lead to bacterial resistance to these drugs (Figure 8).

5.2.3 Changes in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase enzymes

DNA replication involves the enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase. Quinolone antibiotics specifically target these two enzymes, which is why modifications in their structure can lead to bacterial resistance against quinolones (Figure 9).

5.2.4 Changes in D-alanyl-D-alanine

The peptidoglycan precursors contain a dipeptide residue known as D-alanyl-D-alanine, which plays a crucial role in cell wall formation. Alterations to this D-alanyl-D-alanine residue can lead to bacterial resistance to antibiotics that target it.

5.2.5 Protection of ribosome

Tetracycline antibiotics are known to target the ribosomal 30S subunit, but the ribosome has defense mechanisms that can resist their action.

5.2.6 Alteration in RNA polymerase enzyme importing resistance to rifampicin antibiotics

Rifampicin is an antibiotic commonly used to treat bacterial infections. It works by inhibiting the RNA synthesis process in bacteria, specifically by binding to the beta-subunit of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme. This binding prevents the enzyme from effectively transcribing DNA into RNA, leading to the inhibition of bacterial growth and ultimately causing cell death.

However, bacteria can develop resistance to rifampicin through alterations in the RNA polymerase enzyme. Mutations in the rpoB gene, which encodes the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase, can confer resistance to rifampicin. These mutations can affect the binding affinity between rifampicin and the RNA polymerase enzyme, reducing the ability of the antibiotic to inhibit RNA synthesis.

The alterations in the RNA polymerase enzyme that result in rifampicin resistance can have several consequences. One of the effects is the alteration of the levels of peptidoglycan precursors, which are essential components of the bacterial cell wall. Changes in the levels of these precursors can impact the integrity and stability of the cell wall, potentially affecting the susceptibility of bacteria to other antibiotics, such as beta-lactams.

It is important to note that rifampicin resistance can arise through various mechanisms, and alterations in the RNA polymerase enzyme are just one of them. Other mechanisms include the acquisition of resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer and the overexpression of efflux pumps that can actively remove rifampicin from the bacterial cell.

5.3 Bacteria inactivate the antibiotic by enzymes

Three key enzymes are responsible for antibiotic inactivation (Figure 10). These enzymes include the following:

5.3.1 Beta-lactamases enzymes

These enzymes produced by bacteria have the ability to break down all B-lactam antibiotics that are bonded with ester and amide. This leads to the development of resistance in bacteria that can produce beta-lactamase enzymes toward beta-lactam antibiotics.

5.3.2 Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (AGES)

Enzymes are known to play a crucial role in antibiotic resistance. Specifically, enzymes such as aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) have been found to prevent the attachment of aminoglycoside antibiotics to their ribosomal target. These enzymes are present in various bacterial strains, including E. faecalis, S. aureus, and S. pneumoniae. In addition to their role in preventing antibiotic attachment, these enzymes also aid in conferring resistance to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Thus, the presence of AMEs in bacterial strains is a major concern in the field of antibiotic resistance, as it poses a significant challenge to the effectiveness of these antibiotics in treating bacterial infections.

5.3.3 Chloramphenicol-acetyl-transferases enzymes

Enzymes known as chloramphenicol-acetyltransferases modify the antibiotic chloramphenicol by acetylating its hydroxyl group, resulting in an altered form of the antibiotic that is unable to bind to its ribosomal target. Consequently, bacteria possessing the chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase enzyme are resistant to chloramphenicol antibiotics, rendering them ineffective.

6 Spread of antibiotic resistance among bacteria

When a microorganism is able to survive or grow in an antibiotic concentration that would normally inhibit or kill other organisms of the same species, it is considered resistant. In clinical practice, the terms “susceptible” and “resistant” are often used to describe the likelihood of successful treatment with antibiotics. Resistance is more likely to occur when a patient is unable to attain the concentration of antibiotic necessary to inhibit or kill the bacteria. Microorganisms can either inherently possess resistance to an antibiotic or acquire it after exposure. The development of resistance can occur through gene mutations or direct transfer of resistance genes, which can be carried on plasmids (mobile genetic elements) and transmitted through conjugation, or through the direct transfer of naked DNA through transformation (Figure 11) or the transfer of similar DNA through bacteriophages, a process known as transduction. Even among bacteria of different species, genetic material, including antibiotic-resistance genes, can spread rapidly. It was reported that heavy metals and biofilm formation increase the spread of antibiotic resistance among bacteria.

Different resistant bacteria can travel through various means, allowing them to spread and potentially cause infections in different settings. While the specific mechanisms of travel may vary depending on the bacteria and the environment, there are several common routes through which resistant bacteria can spread. For example:1. Person-to-person transmission: Resistant bacteria can be transmitted directly from one person to another through close contact. This can occur through physical contact, such as touching or shaking hands with an infected person, or through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs or sneezes.2. Contaminated surfaces: Resistant bacteria can survive on surfaces for extended periods. When a person touches a contaminated surface, such as doorknobs, countertops, or medical equipment, they can transfer the bacteria to their hands. If they then touch their face or mouth, the bacteria can enter their body and potentially cause an infection.3. Healthcare settings: Hospitals and healthcare facilities can be hotspots for the spread of resistant bacteria. Factors such as poor hygiene practices, inadequate infection control measures, and the close proximity of patients can contribute to the transmission of bacteria. Healthcare workers can inadvertently spread resistant bacteria from one patient to another if proper hand hygiene and infection control protocols are not followed.4. Animal-to-human transmission: Resistant bacteria can also be transmitted from animals to humans. This can occur through direct contact with infected animals or through the consumption of contaminated food products, such as meat or dairy products. Farm animals, in particular, can harbor resistant bacteria due to the use of antibiotics in agriculture.5. Travel and international spread: Resistant bacteria can be carried across borders through international travel. People who are infected or colonized with resistant bacteria can unknowingly spread them to other countries. This can contribute to the global dissemination of resistant strains and make it more challenging to control their spread.

1. Person-to-person transmission: Resistant bacteria can be transmitted directly from one person to another through close contact. This can occur through physical contact, such as touching or shaking hands with an infected person, or through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs or sneezes.

2. Contaminated surfaces: Resistant bacteria can survive on surfaces for extended periods. When a person touches a contaminated surface, such as doorknobs, countertops, or medical equipment, they can transfer the bacteria to their hands. If they then touch their face or mouth, the bacteria can enter their body and potentially cause an infection.

3. Healthcare settings: Hospitals and healthcare facilities can be hotspots for the spread of resistant bacteria. Factors such as poor hygiene practices, inadequate infection control measures, and the close proximity of patients can contribute to the transmission of bacteria. Healthcare workers can inadvertently spread resistant bacteria from one patient to another if proper hand hygiene and infection control protocols are not followed.

4. Animal-to-human transmission: Resistant bacteria can also be transmitted from animals to humans. This can occur through direct contact with infected animals or through the consumption of contaminated food products, such as meat or dairy products. Farm animals, in particular, can harbor resistant bacteria due to the use of antibiotics in agriculture.

5. Travel and international spread: Resistant bacteria can be carried across borders through international travel. People who are infected or colonized with resistant bacteria can unknowingly spread them to other countries. This can contribute to the global dissemination of resistant strains and make it more challenging to control their spread.

It is important to note that the specific mechanisms of travel and transmission can vary depending on the bacteria and the setting. Additionally, the spread of resistant bacteria can be influenced by factors such as poor hygiene, inadequate sanitation, and suboptimal infection control practices.

7 Factors affecting the resistance of antibiotics

The emergence of antibiotic resistance is accelerated by the under, over, or improper use of antibiotics. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics, which promotes antibiotic resistance, is caused by a variety of factors, including patients’ noncompliance with prescribed treatment and demand, irrational use of antibiotics by prescribers in human medicine, drug advertising, dispensing doctors, antibiotic use in agriculture, poor antibiotic quality, inadequate surveillance, and susceptibility testing. Despite their knowledge of a patient’s diagnosis, doctors and prescribers can be heavily influenced by patient demand, which can contribute to antimicrobial and antibiotic resistance.

Patients may discontinue their treatment once they begin to feel better, forget to take their prescriptions, or only purchase a portion of the medication. In such cases, increased physician-patient interaction is often necessary to ensure proper compliance with treatment. Additionally, antibiotics are readily available in pharmacies without a prescription, which further contributes to their misuse by patients.

The pharmaceutical industry also plays a role in promoting antibiotic misuse through advertising. For example, some advertisements claim that certain antibiotics, such as Ciprofloxacin, are the best option for at-risk patients. In the past, advertisements in the Philippines encouraged the use of lincomycin for pharyngitis/tonsillitis and clindamycin for upper respiratory tract infections, despite the fact that these conditions are often caused by viral infections that do not require antibiotics. Overall, inappropriate antibiotic use is a multifaceted issue that requires cooperation between healthcare providers, patients, and the pharmaceutical industry to address.

Medical professionals have a significant impact on the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. It is common for doctors to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics when narrow-spectrum ones would be more appropriate. The prescribing patterns of doctors can vary, and studies have shown that 30%–60% of patients receive more antibiotics than necessary. Additionally, incorrect prescriptions and recommendations from untrained medical professionals pose a significant risk. A related study found that private practitioners often prescribe unnecessary medications.

Hospitals and clinics are significant contributors to the development of microbial resistance to antibiotics. Inadequate infection control protocols, such as failure to wash hands or change gloves regularly, have been identified as factors contributing to this problem. Another issue is the use of poor-quality antibiotics. This problem persists due to the lack of quality compliance and monitoring, leading to the use of expired and counterfeit antibiotics. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in animals is also a concern. Some antibiotics are administered to animals to boost their growth and prevent sickness. However, the surveillance and susceptibility testing of antibiotics are insufficient (Table 2).

8 Alternative approaches to combat antibiotic resistance

We are now in grave danger because of the global antibiotic resistance crisis, which is constantly increasing. Therefore, we should focus on finding solutions to fight this resistance crisis. There are several approaches to fight this crisis which we discuss in this review article as follows:

8.1 Discovery of new antibiotics

In 2015, researchers discovered a new antibiotic called teixobactin, which demonstrated bactericidal activity against S. aureus, Clostridium difficile, and Bacillus anthracis. On 20 February 2020, researchers published an article in Cell titled “A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery.” Using artificial intelligence, they discovered a new antibiotic called halicin, which showed bactericidal activity against a broad spectrum of pathogenic and resistant bacteria.

On 26 September 2022, researchers published an article in Nature Microbiology titled “Computational identification of a systemic antibiotic for Gram-negative Bacteria.” Using computational screening, they discovered a new antibiotic called dynobactin, which demonstrated potent bactericidal activity against dangerous Gram-negative bacteria resistant to other antibiotics.

The dysfunctional R&D market for detecting new antibiotics refers to the challenges and limitations faced in the research and development of new antibiotics. These challenges include economic, regulatory, and scientific barriers that hinder the discovery and development of effective antibiotics to combat bacterial infections. Some of the key issues in the dysfunctional R&D market for detecting new antibiotics include:

8.1.1 A-economic challenges

Limited financial incentives: The high cost and low profitability of developing new antibiotics have led to a lack of investment from pharmaceutical companies.

Long development timelines: The lengthy and expensive process of developing new antibiotics makes it less attractive for companies to invest in this area.

8.1.2 B-regulatory challenges

Stringent regulatory requirements: The regulatory approval process for new antibiotics is complex and time-consuming, leading to delays in bringing new drugs to market.

Limited guidance on clinical trial design: There is a lack of clear guidelines for conducting clinical trials for antibiotics, which can further hinder the development process.

8.1.3 C-scientific challenges

Antibiotic resistance: The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a significant challenge in the development of new antibiotics.

Limited understanding of bacterial biology: Despite advances in genomics and other technologies, there is still much to learn about the biology of bacteria and their mechanisms of resistance.

8.2 Antibiotic adjuvants

Antibiotic adjuvants are compounds that do not directly kill bacteria but instead enhance an antibiotic’s effectiveness by inhibiting resistance mechanisms. For example, beta-lactamase inhibitors are small-molecule antibiotic adjuvants. Beta-lactamase inhibitors, when combined with beta-lactam antibiotics, have been used successfully for over 30 years to treat Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections. Their use has been extensively documented.

8.3 Nano antibiotics

Nanoscale antibiotics, which consist of pure antibiotic molecules between 1 and 100 nm in size or antibiotic molecules physically attached to nanoparticles, represent one beneficial use of nanotechnology. By reengineering antibiotics at the nanoscale, this new antimicrobial approach revives the arsenal of available medications by making them effective against various clinically important microorganisms. Unlike their bulk chemical counterparts, nanoantibiotics have different physicochemical properties and increased potency. Because nanoscale drug delivery systems can transport and bind to intracellular targets, reducing bacterial growth and metabolism and ultimately causing cell death, a medication delivered via or incorporated into nanoparticles at the same dose has significantly greater inhibitory effects on bacterial growth.

8.4 Botanicals

Plants produce secondary metabolites, including alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, quinones, tannins, coumarins, terpenes, lectins, and saponins. These secondary metabolites exhibit antimicrobial activity against various microorganisms.

8.5 Bacteriophages

According to the National Institute of Health (NIH, 2014), bacteriophages are innovative elements that could combat microbial resistance. Numerous studies applied bacteriophages on humans and animals to treat various bacterial diseases and showed positive, effective results. These bacterial pathogens include Shigella dysenteriae, Vibrio cholera, P. aeruginosa, C. difficile, Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, β-lactamase-producing E. coli, imipenem resistant P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, MDR-S. aureus, unclassified bacterial dysentery, S. typhi, and antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa.

9 Conclusion

This review article has discussed various aspects related to antibiotics, their mechanisms of action, the problem of antibiotic resistance, and potential solutions to combat resistance. Antibiotics have diverse applications in different fields but their use remains controversial owing to resistance issues. Antibiotics act through four primary mechanisms to kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. However, bacteria have evolved mechanisms to become resistant to antibiotics, diminishing the effectiveness of these drugs. Given the limited capabilities of traditional antibiotics due to resistance, we discussed several promising alternative approaches, including the discovery of new antibiotics, the use of antibiotic adjuvants and nanoparticle-based antibiotics, botanicals, and bacteriophages. Although developing new antibiotics is challenging, a combination of complementary strategies such as nanoantibiotics, adjuvants, botanicals, and phage therapy could help address the resistance crisis.

References 103

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Anwar M. Iqbal Q. Saleem F. (2020 ). Improper disposal of unused antibiotics: an often overlooked driver of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev. Anti-Infective Ther. 18 (8), 697–699.

    Not in our library10.1080/14787210.2020.1754797

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Benbrook C. M. (2002 ). Antibiotic drug use in US aquaculture. United States: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy Report February, 1–18.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Bhattacharyya S. (2012 ). Do bacteria age? Resonance 17 (4), 347–364.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12045-012-0037-4

  6. 6.

    Biondo C. (2023 ). Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens 12 (1), 116–214.

    Not in our library10.3390/pathogens12010116

  7. 7.

    Biswas B. Sankar A. Paul W. Paul B. Trostel A. N. Powell B. (2002 ). Erratum: bacteriophage therapy rescues mice bacteremic from a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (infection and immunity (2002) 70:1 (204-210)). Infect. Immun. 70 (3), 1664.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.70.3.1664-1664.2002

  8. 8.

    Blondeau J. M. (2004 ). Fluoroquinolones: mechanism of action, classification, and development of resistance. Surv. Ophthalmol. 49, S73–S78. 2 SUPPL. 2.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.01.005

  9. 9.

    Brodersen D. E. Clemons W. M. Carter A. P. Morgan-Warren R. J. Wimberly B. T. Ramakrishnan V. (2000 ). The structural basis for the action of the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B, on the 30S ribosomal subunit. Cell 103 (7), 1143–1154.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00216-6

  10. 10.

    Bush N. G. Evans-roberts K. Anthony M. (2015 ). DNA topoisomerases. EcoSal Plus 6 (2), 1–34.

    Not in our library10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0010-2014

  11. 11.

    Capasso C. Supuran C. T. (2014 ). Sulfa and trimethoprim-like drugs-antimetabolites acting as carbonic anhydrase, dihydropteroate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhibition Med. Chem. 29 (3), 379–387.

    Not in our library10.3109/14756366.2013.787422

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Chanishvili N. (2012 ). Phage therapy-history from twort and d’Herelle through soviet experience to current approaches. Vol. 83. 1. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-394438-2.00001-3

  14. 14.

    Chanishvili N. Sharp R. (2008 ). Bacteriophage therapy: experience from the eliava Institute, Georgia. Microbiol. Aust. 29 (2), 96.

    Not in our library10.1071/ma08096

  15. 15.

    Cho H. Uehara T. Bernhardt T. G. (2014 ). Beta-lactam antibiotics induce a lethal malfunctioning of the bacterial cell wall synthesis machinery. Cell 159 (6), 1300–1311.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.017

  16. 16.

    Clardy J. Fischbach M. A. Walsh C. T. (2006 ). New antibiotics from bacterial natural products. Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (12), 1541–1550.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1266

  17. 17.

    Clements A. Halton K. Graves N. Pettitt A. Morton A. Looke D. (2008 ). Overcrowding and understaffing in modern health-care systems: key determinants in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Lancet Infect. Dis. 8 (7), 427–434.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70151-8

  18. 18.

    Darby E. M. Trampari E. Siasat P. Solsona Gaya M. Alav I. Webber M. A. (2023 ). Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21 (5), 280–295.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y

  19. 19.

    Darj E. Md Shah N. Zaman M. H. (2019 ). Pharmacists’ perception of their challenges at work, focusing on antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study from Bangladesh. Glob. Health Action 12, 1735126. sup1.

    Not in our library10.1080/16549716.2020.1735126

  20. 20.

    Dawood M. A. O. Koshio S. Ángeles Esteban. M. (2018 ). Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review. Rev. Aquac. 10 (4), 950–974.

    Not in our library10.1111/raq.12209

  21. 21.

    Delcour A. H. (2009 ). Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochimica Biophysica Acta - Proteins Proteomics 1794 (5), 808–816.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.005

  22. 22.

    Džidić S. Šušković J. Kos B. (2008 ). Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: biochemical and genetic aspects. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (1), 11–21.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Fàbrega A. Madurga S. Giralt E. Vila J. (2009 ). Mechanism of action of and resistance to quinolones. Microb. Biotechnol. 2 (1), 40–61.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00063.x

  24. 24.

    Fernandes R. Amador P. Prudêncio C. (2013 ). β-Lactams: chemical structure, mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Rev. Res. Med. Microbiol. 24 (1), 7–17.

    Not in our library10.1097/mrm.0b013e3283587727

  25. 25.

    Fernandez B. María A. E. Llambías C. Jordana-Lluch E. Oliver A. Macià M. D. (2023 ). Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Biofilm 5, 100129. Figure 1.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100129

  26. 26.

    Fish R. Kutter E. Wheat G. Blasdel B. Kutateladze M. Kuhl S. (2016 ). Saint peter, hospital family, and medicine residency. England: Fish2016.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Foti C. Piperno A. Scala A. Giuffrè O. (2021 ). Oxazolidinone antibiotics: chemical, biological and analytical aspects. Molecules 26 (14), 4280.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules26144280

  28. 28.

    Garcia-Graells C. Antoine J. Larsen J. Catry B. Skov R. Denis O. (2012 ). Livestock veterinarians at high risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Epidemiol. Infect. 140 (3), 383–389.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0950268811002263

  29. 29.

    Gilbert D. M. (2001 ). Making sense of eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Science 294 (5540), 96–100.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1061724

  30. 30.

    Gonzalez Ronquillo M. Juan Carlos Angeles H. (2017 ). Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: review of impact and analytical methods. Food control. 72, 255–267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.001

  31. 31.

    Gupta P. D. Birdi T. J. (2017 ). Development of botanicals to combat antibiotic resistance. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 8 (4), 266–275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jaim.2017.05.004

  32. 32.

    Gupta R. Gupta N. (2021 ). Fundamentals of bacterial physiology and metabolism. Singapore: Springer.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Hasan C. M. Dutta D. Nguyen A. N. T. (2021 ). Revisiting antibiotic resistance: mechanistic foundations to evolutionary outlook Antibiotics 11, 40.

    Not in our library10.3390/antibiotics11010040

  34. 34.

    Hirsch J. Klostermeier D. (2021 ). What makes a type IIA topoisomerase a gyrase or a topo IV? Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (11), 6027–6042.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab270

  35. 35.

    Jana S. Deb J. K. (2006 ). Molecular understanding of aminoglycoside action and resistance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 70 (2), 140–150.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-005-0279-0

  36. 36.

    Jijie R. Barras A. Teodorescu F. Boukherroub R. Szunerits S. (2017 ). Advancements on the molecular design of nanoantibiotics: current level of development and future challenges. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2 (4), 349–369.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7me00048k

  37. 37.

    Johansson M. Lovmar M. Ehrenberg M. (2008 ). Rate and accuracy of bacterial protein synthesis revisited. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11 (2), 141–147.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.015

  38. 38.

    Kang H. K. Park Y. (2015 ). Glycopeptide antibiotics: structure and mechanisms of action. J. Bacteriol. Virology 45 (2), 67–78.

    Not in our library10.4167/jbv.2015.45.2.67

  39. 39.

    Kaur Sodhi K. Singh C. K. (2022 ). Recent development in the sustainable remediation of antibiotics: a review. Total Environ. Res. Themes 3–4, 100008. May.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.totert.2022.100008

  40. 40.

    Kester J. C. Fortune S. M. (2014 ). Persisters and beyond: mechanisms of phenotypic drug resistance and drug tolerance in bacteria. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 49 (2), 91–101.

    Not in our library10.3109/10409238.2013.869543

All 103 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.