Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Experimental Targeting for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Juan Decara, Patricia Rivera, Antonio Jesús López-Gambero and 5 more

Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00730

Abstract

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of nuclear receptor proteins that promote ligand-dependent transcription of target genes that regulate energy production, lipid metabolism, and inflammation. The PPAR superfamily comprises three subtypes, PPARα, PPARγ, and PPARβ/δ, with differential tissue distributions. In addition to their different roles in the regulation of energy balance and carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, an emerging function of PPARs includes normal homeostasis of intestinal tissue. PPARα activation represses NF-κB signaling, which decreases the inflammatory cytokine production by different cell types, while PPARγ ligands can inhibit activation of macrophages and the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and Il-1β. In this regard, the anti-inflammatory responses induced by PPAR activation might restore physiopathological imbalances associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Thus, PPARs and their ligands have important therapeutic potential. This review briefly discusses the roles of PPARs in the physiopathology and therapies of the most important IBDs, ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD), as well some new experimental compounds with PPAR activity as promising drugs for IBD treatment.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Idiopathic Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the intestinal tract, the main types of which are ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), while 10% to 15% of patients are diagnosed with some type of undetermined colitis (UC). Accumulating reports suggest that an unsuitable inflammatory response to intestinal host–microbiota–environment interactions may be associated with the onset of IBDs. IBDs are characterized by a chronic evolution, with severe diarrhea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and weight loss among the main symptoms, which ultimately might generate a debilitating and eventually life-threatening condition. The current treatment of IBDs is based on anti-inflammatory drugs, including 5-aaminosalicylates (5-ASA) and corticosteroids. In addition, immunosuppressant drugs or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists are used as complementary therapy. However, pharmacological treatment has not been optimized, and many patients need surgical procedures to remove lesioned segments of the gut. There is therefore a need for new approaches to counteract inflammatory and necrosis events that lead to destruction of the mucosa and submucosal tissues in IBD. Furthermore, new treatments could avoid the common side effects of long-term 5-ASA and corticosteroid treatment. Due to these limitations, new studies are immediately needed to develop new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of IBD.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are versatile and potent regulators of a variety of cellular functions. They are part of a nuclear receptor superfamily that includes steroids and thyroid hormone receptors, retinoid receptors, and vitamin D receptors. Specifically, PPARs are a subgroup of ligand-activated transcription factors that can regulate transcriptional activity directly by two different mechanisms: 1) as a ligand-dependent transcription factor binding to DNA at the promoter region of genes with sequences known as peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs); and 2) as transcription factors, whereby PPARs can control gene expression by associating with activator proteins independently of PPREs. Therefore, PPARs can regulate sequences of many genes involved in diverse metabolic functions related to lipid and glucose homeostasis, cholesterol, and energy balance.

In this review, we will a) summarize some important aspects of PPAR biology and pharmacology, b) describe IBDs and some of the most important preclinical outcomes regarding the anti-inflammatory role of PPARs in several experimental models of IBDs, and c) discuss future therapeutic strategies against IBD. Figure 1 summarizes the framework for understanding the mechanism of PPAR activation to modulate the pathogenesis of IBDs, as it is being reviewed in the present work.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

PPARs represent a family of ligand-activated nuclear hormone receptors (NRs) belonging to the steroid receptor superfamily. Some natural ligands include fatty acids and eicosanoids, but PPAR structure also reveals selective lipophilic ligand binding pockets that are able to accommodate endogenous fatty acids and their derivatives as well as different chemical compounds, such as fibrates and thiazolidinediones (TZD) used to treat metabolic disorders, including hypertriglyceridemia or type 2 diabetes. Some fatty acids, including endoperoxides and acylethanolamides, might activate the three PPARs. For transcriptional activity, PPARs need to heterodimerize with the retinoid-X-receptor (RXR). Thus, after activation, PPAR-RXR heterodimers can bind to specific DNA sequences called PPREs, which in turn stimulate the transcription of target genes. In consequence, depending on the type of cell, the function of PPARs can be stimulated by the presence of coactivators or inhibited by corepressors. Due to their main roles as genetic expression modulators, PPARs also have differential tissue expression. This process can then activate transcription of various genes involved in diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes that play main roles in the pathogenesis of several chronic diseases, such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, liver disease, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer, involving inflammatory effects and their corresponding clinical implications. In this regard, PPARs play an important role in regulating inflammation, fibrosis, and immunity. PPAR ligands can cause this to bind to the promoter sequence of target genes that participate in inflammation, modulating the proliferation, differentiation and survival of immune cells, such as macrophages, B cells, and T cells. The mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory effects mediated by PPARs are based on the diminished proinflammatory activity of transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes responsible for inflammation, such as cytokines, adhesion molecules, and extracellular matrix proteins, and increasing the production of anti-inflammatory molecules.

PPAR activity is triggered by endogenous compounds that modify the spatial conformation of these receptors by binding to the active ligand binding site and promoting transactivation of metabolic genes. In addition, PPARs act as transrepressors of pro-inflammatory genes as gene transcription regulators. However, the simple view of ligands as “activators,” i.e., “agonists,” has recently been challenged by studies identifying compounds capable of acting as antagonists (compounds without intrinsic activity that interact with the binding site, preventing activation induced by agonists) or inverse agonists (compounds with intrinsic activity capable of eliciting PPAR repression).

Since clinical experience and research have been focused on PPAR agonists, the present review will be centered on drugs with direct or indirect PPAR activity. However, it is important to understand that both antagonists and inverse agonists are potentially useful new drugs that eventually might have clinical utility.

Furthermore, numerous synthetic compounds are used for clinic therapy, such as fibrate family members and TZDs, both of which are able to bind and activate PPARα and PPARγ, respectively, which is being used to treat metabolic disorders, such as hypertriglyceridemia or type 2 diabetes.

Subtypes of PPAR Receptors

Three isoforms of nuclear PPAR receptors are known: PPAR-alpha (PPARα), PPAR-gamma (PPARγ), and PPAR-delta (PPARδ), also known as PPAR-beta/delta (PPARβ/δ) or nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group C, member 2 (NR1C2). PPARα is highly expressed in the muscle, heart, kidney, liver, and small and large intestine, being a target of fibrate hypolipidemic drugs implicated mainly in the catabolism of fatty acids and their oxidation. Hence, PPARα agonists have a significant importance in the treatment of dyslipidemia or metabolic syndromes by decreasing triglyceride levels in plasma. Furthermore, one of the most important roles is linked to glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance, which is widely studied at present. The particularity of PPARα to be expressed in peripheral tissues makes it crucial in relevant metabolic pathways implicated in the physiopathology of prevalent diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, inflammation, cancer, or neurodegeneration. Oleoylethanolamide (OEA), an anorectic acylethanolamide synthesized in the intestine, has been described as an endogenous ligand for the PPARα receptor, much like other acylethanolamides, such as palmithylethanolamide (PEA). Either activation of PPARα by OEA or PEA or elevation of its endogenous levels through inhibitors of the acid amidase enzyme that degrades them has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting a potential utility of this receptor.

PPARγ may be the most widely studied PPAR isoform. To date, several studies have evaluated the role of PPARγ in major metabolic tissues and cell types, including liver, adipocytes, pancreas, macrophages, skeletal muscle, and colonocytes, among others. An alteration in this ligand-activated transcription factor is associated with metabolic disorders, such as atherosclerosis, obesity, metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemias, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. Like PPARα, the implication of PPARγ in these prevalent diseases makes it a potential target of pharmacotherapies. There is evidence that PPARγ may also contribute to the anti-inflammatory property of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), as n3 PUFA enhanced hepatic regulatory T (Treg) cell generation by upregulating PPARγ and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) expression, thus regulating inflammatory processes in the liver. Along these lines, PPARγ is a target of other PUFA-derived compounds and arachidonic acid (AA), such as 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), the most recently discovered anti-inflammatory eicosanoid of which numerous beneficial effects on health are known. Recent studies in rat colonic inflammation support the hypothesis of cooperation among eicosanoid prostaglandin and PPARγ, correlating the levels of 15d-PGJ2 and PPARγ expression with improved symptoms. In this sense, antinociceptive and antiedematogenic activities of fenofibrate, an agonist of PPARα, and pioglitazone, a synthetic TZD agonist of PPARγ, have also been observed.

High expression of PPARβ/δ has been reported in the skeletal muscle, liver, kidney, adipose tissue, and intestine. It also participates in lipid homeostasis, regulation of fatty acid oxidation, inflammation, and balances of blood cholesterol and glucose. In this regard, PPARβ/δ activation can confer protection from atherosclerosis and metabolic disease. In the liver, the activation of PPARβ/δ stimulates glucose uptake and gluconeogenesis inhibition, thus improving insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. In humans, activation of PPARβ/δ has also been found to improve the sensitivity of insulin and to counteract abnormalities related to metabolic syndrome without increasing oxidative stress. Although relatively little is known, PPARβ/δ-specific functions include adiposity and placentation.

Due to its function as an essential regulator of target genes by transcriptional activation or repression through both ligand-dependent and -independent mechanisms and its interactions with other transcription factors, the expression of PPARβ/δ is associated with an unfavorable outcomes of several human cancers. The role of PPAR in inflammation, differentiation, apoptosis, and other related cancer processes is mechanistically understood, and the available data actually do not clarify the real performance of PPARβ/δ in carcinogenic processes, with the data being inconclusive and controversial.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

IBD is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gut and is distinguished by two principal conditions: UC and CD. CD usually affects any part of the gastrointestinal tract between the mouth and the anus, including some areas that may be interspersed and that can be confused as normal mucosa when observed microscopically and macroscopically. Furthermore, the transmural inflammation is pathognomonic in CD, being able to extend from the mucosa to the serosa layer, occasionally associated with granulomas, and even able to affect other kinds of layers in the bowel wall. This transmural inflammation present in CD can lead to complications, such as fistulas, which may perforate layers and simultaneously cause structural changes in the digestive tract. While the inflammation in UC is normally restricted to the mucosal layer of the entire colon in an uninterrupted pattern, the inflammation in CD is typically confined to the mucosa layer of the colon. Both UC and CD may affect multiple organs beyond the gastrointestinal tract, increasing the risk of suffering additional pathologies, such as liver disease or colorectal cancer. Alteration of the immune system and inadequate commensal bacteria in the bowel or other luminal antigens likely result in a relapsing chronic inflammatory state in humans. The origins of these enteropathies are unknown, although current hypotheses suggest that these diseases are related to a dysregulated immune response of the mucosa by nonidentified constituents of the intestinal microbiota in a genetically susceptible host. There is even a hypothesis that deworming is positively correlated and early-childhood parasite infections are negatively correlated with immunologic disease, and children living in extremely hygienic environments with infrequent exposure to parasitic infections can adversely affect immune development, predisposing children to develop autoimmune diseases, such as IBD, in adult life.

The development of IBD may involve proinflammatory molecules, such as TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-6, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and IL-12, which are highly expressed and have important roles in mediating immune inflammatory responses. Likewise, potent immunoregulatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), can be increased in the gut compared with healthy guts, along with IL-17 expression, which is expressed by most patients with IBD.

Currently, the therapies for IBD are to prevent relapses and improve quality of life of patients. Research into IBD pathogenesis is focused on the development of therapies, including oral or rectal 5-ASA, mesalazine, balsalazide sulfasalazine, olsalazine; traditional corticosteroids, such as prednisone, hydrocortisone, budesonide, prednisolone, dexamethasone as anti-inflammatory agents; antibiotic therapy that modulates the gut flora; and immunosuppressive agents that modulate the effects of exaggerated immune responses. Other promising treatments for IBD include herbal therapies because of their properties on epithelial proliferation and barrier integrity by restoring a state of microbiota homeostasis and inhibiting immune reaction and plant-derived alkaloids because of their potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Biological therapies with anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies are also under development for IBD, including Infliximab, which is the most often used. Infliximab is a potent biological anti-inflammatory agent capable of diminishing the effect of TNF-α and inducing apoptosis of activated lymphocytes. However, the clinical response to this treatment is only approximately 65%, and it is associated with potential risk of infections-sepsis, lupus-like syndrome, and infusion-related reactions. 5-ASA is a well-known anti-inflammatory agent, but the molecular mechanism underlying its gastrointestinal effects on IBD remains unknown. The latest reports have shown that some adipokines, such as leptin, adiponectin, visfatin, chemerin, and retinoid binding protein (RBP4), play a role in the systemic immune responses observed in IBD patients. Moreover, an imbalance between cytokines and adipokines, such as leptin and adiponectin, induced by hypercaloric diets or obesity could affect the gut microbiome, prompting an IBD disease process.

IBDs are characterized by high levels of cytokines, contributing to inflammatory processes, such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and chemokines, such as chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 (CXCL2), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3), and chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1 (CX3CL1) in colon tissues. These signals are all triggered by Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK)/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation. PPARs are important for IBD because many of these signaling pathways are downregulated by the activation of PPARγ. Although the mechanism by which PPARγ acts on the pathogenesis of IBD has not been clarified, it may involve cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) and NF-κB modulation, resulting in inhibition of monocyte inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Additionally, PPARγ agonists can suppress the proinflammatory cytokines produced by monocytes, which is beneficial in chronic diseases where combined treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be given at lower doses to minimize the side effects of long-term therapies.

Role of PPARs in the Normal and Inflamed Bowel

PPAR regulation is not fully understood, but it is known that PPARγ mRNA expression is negatively influenced by a fasting state or long-term hypocaloric diet, while it is positively affected by obesity and high fat diets with a high ratio of fatty acids. In addition, an important relationship has been demonstrated between intestinal microbiota and PPARγ actions in the gut. Interestingly, significant downregulation of both PPARα and PPARγ mRNA expression has been found in the colonic mucosa (epithelium and lamina propria) in active UC patients at disease onset, which would implicate it in the pathophysiology of human colonic inflammation. Furthermore, inducible Oxide Nitric Synthase (iNOS) mRNA is overexpressed, an important pro-inflammatory mediator and nitric oxide species producer in the bowel that is actively controlled by PPARα, whose agonists are able to enhance its degradation. PPARα is mainly expressed in the human colonic epithelium; however, it is not expressed in immune cells of the lamina propria. The correlation between PPARα mRNA down-regulation in the UC mucosa and PPARα protein down-regulation in the UC epithelium demonstrates the importance of PPARs in the bowel.

PPARγ is highly expressed in the bowel. Genomic descriptions of intestinal epithelial cells under PPAR agonist stimulation, as demonstrated in mice, showed the possible roles of this receptor in the gut. It was reported that inadequate expression of PPARγ in intestinal epithelial cells can alter mucosal immune responses in experimental IBD. Thus, PPARγ is involved in metabolic homeostasis and function of the intestinal epithelium; in the presence of its agonists, PPARγ can upregulate the activity of target genes. Recently, both synthetic and natural PPARγ agonists were reported to increase the expression and activity of lactase in vitro and in vivo, supporting the importance of PPARγ activation in lactose metabolism in the intestinal epithelium.

Colonization of the human gastrointestinal tract by microorganisms is established immediately at birth, and the maturation process starts when commensal bacteria contact host cells through receptors and induce signaling pathways that activate transcription of nuclear factors, such as PPARs. In this sense, the transmission of Enterococcus faecalis from mother to child can be regulated and activated by PPARγ in primary murine colonic epithelial cells. This kind of study supports the concept that PPARγ in microbiota contributes to the mechanisms of initial homeostasis closely related to postnatal endocrinological development.

Adipose tissue and the large intestine are other main tissues capable of expressing PPARγ. Significant interest in the biological consequences of PPARγ activation in the colon is based on its differentiating and anti-proliferative effects in adipose tissue, as well as its therapeutic potential in chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia. The role of PPARγ in the colon is revealed in part by the cell- and tissue-specific expression of the receptor, with high expression in colon tissue, perhaps even higher than in adipose tissue, in both rodents and humans. Furthermore, higher expression of PPARγ is described mainly in the distal colon than the small intestine and proximal colon. Perhaps this is because PPARγ expression is mainly located in the most differentiated epithelial cells of the colon. Studies with cultured colon cells after differentiation are consistent with the localization of PPARγ in this tissue. Therefore, PPARγ expression, and its overall activation, is associated with a differentiated phenotype in cells of the intestine.

Ulcerative Colitis and the Role of PPARs in the Inflammatory Response Associated with Disease

UC is the most common form of IBD. It presents as a relapsing chronic disease that involves inflammation of the colonic tissue caused by a complex combination and interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. The exacerbated immune response present in CD and that may contribute to inflammation includes pro-inflammatory factors, such as cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, eicosanoids, and platelet-activating factors, among others. Currently, the therapeutic strategies for CD in humans, and in general for IBDs, include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., sulfasalazine, mesalamine) glucocorticoids (e.g., prednisone or prednisolone, budesonide), immunosuppressants (e.g., azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate), antibiotics (e.g., antimycobacterial drugs, metronidazole), and anti–TNF-α antibody therapies (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab). While PPARs have a well-established role in inflammation, the specific contribution of PPARs to the UC intestinal epithelium is actively under investigation ( Figure 2; ). Both PPARα and PPARγ are highly expressed in epithelial cells and macrophages of the intestinal and colonic mucosa. Analysis by RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunohistochemical approaches in the colon of UC patients showed decreased PPARγ mRNA and protein compared with healthy controls. also reported reduced mRNA expression of PPARγ in the mucosa of active UC compared with patients with UC in remission, suggesting a negative correlation between PPARγ and UC progression.

Animal Models for Studying IBDs

Rodents and humans share approximately 99% of genes, showing significant similarities in the physiology of organs, metabolic processes, and pathogenesis of different diseases. Rodents are excellent model organisms thanks to their relatively small size and short generation time. To discuss the experimental data that establish a potential contribution of PPARs to the pathophysiological changes associated with IBD, we must understand the different preclinical models used to investigate this complex human disease. There are several rodent models of drug-induced IBD. The most commonly used models are dextran sodium sulphate-induced colitis (DSS-induced colitis), trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis (TNBS-induced colitis), dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis (DNBS-induced colitis), intra colonic acetic acid instillation-induced colitis (AA-induced colitis), and oxazolone-induced colitis (OXA-induced colitis).

One of the earliest models of spontaneous intestinal inflammation in mice is genetic IL-10 deficiency (IL-10 knockout mice). These animal models allow the study of new approaches against IBD, as the disease can develop in them without the limitations associated with human studies.

For research and preclinical studies, genetically modified mice are commonly used, as they represent a mammalian model in which specific mouse genes can be replaced with their human equivalents. In this line, a PPARα-null mouse (PPARα knockout mice) was developed to study alterations associated with the loss of function of this receptor and the potential implication of its ligands in the regulation of metabolism. PPARγ-null mice have also been generated. Only heterozygous PPARγ knockout mice are viable; however, they have been very useful for the development of several novel compounds, which might be potential modulators of PPARγ.

With either model, combined or separate, it is possible to design new studies that may include different variables and combinations, serving as an effective tool in the search for new therapies for IBD.

Role for PPARγ in Ulcerative Colitis

The average expression of PPARγ in the small intestine and colon is higher than that observed in other organs, and PPARγ expression in the colonic epithelium of UC patients is lower than controls. Similar deficiencies in PPARγ expression were observed in macrophages of the lamina propria of DSS-induced colitis mice. This impairment of PPARγ expression in colonocytes may be promoted by a deficiency of cortisol production. These findings suggest that chronic inflammation and/or genetic susceptibility to inflammation could be caused by decreased PPARγ expression in the colon. This hypothesis is also supported by the results obtained in studies with PPARγ-deficient mice that were highly predisposed to injuries associated with ischemia/reperfusion lesions.

Even though UC pathogenesis mechanisms are still unknown, several studies have proposed the beneficial effects of PPARγ agonists for diminution of colonic inflammation, with many reports showing PPARγ activation in intestinal tissues and its link with an anti-inflammatory role in UC. At the beginning, thiopurines were commonly used to treat symptoms of UC patients, but the classic treatment for maintenance of remission from mild to moderate UC consists of 5-ASA, with Mesalazine as the most used therapy. In this sense, there is evidence to suggest that the anti-inflammatory effect of 5-ASAs in the colon is mediated by PPARγ. Previous studies using animal models of irradiation-induced intestinal inflammation showed that 5-ASA is capable of inducing PPARγ expression, promoting its translocation to the nucleus of intestinal cells.

Synthetic PPARγ ligands, such as TZDs, are also capable of inhibiting the activation of homodimeric and heterodimeric complexes of NF-κB family members, thus strongly attenuating the immune response and diminishing the gene expression of pro-inflammatory IL-8 in colon cancer cell lines. TZDs, such as pioglitazone, troglitazone, and rosiglitazone, also provide protection in mouse models of colitis or colon cancer cell lines, suggesting that colonic PPARγ may be a potential therapeutic approach against UC in humans. reported that both heterozygote PPARγ (Pparγ1/_) and retinoid X (Rxrα1/_) receptor-deficient mice displayed increased vulnerability to TNBS-induced colitis. As a result, synergistic activation of the RXR/PPARγ heterodimer was established by the PPARγ agonists rosiglitazone or troglitazone and the RXR agonist retinoid, suggesting protective combined effects against colon inflammation. Further, a recent study of DSS-induced colitis showed that the partial RXR agonist CBt-PMN was also capable of ameliorating intestinal inflammation in this mouse model of UC through both PPARβ/δ/RXR and Nur77/RXR heterodimer activation.

Role for PPARγ as a Modulator of Cytokine/Chemokine Production

Deregulated production of cytokines, such as CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL3, is implicated in IBD pathogenesis. These cytokines are specifically expressed in inflamed areas of the colon. A recent study showed how the novel PPARγ agonist 2-hydroxyethyl 5-chloro4,5-didehydrojasmonate (J11-Cl) can increase the transcription of PPARγ-dependent inflammatory pathways and reduce the intestinal inflammation in DSS-induced colitic mice. The increased transcriptional activity of PPARγ was linked to decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production, such as IL-6 and IL-8, chemokines, including CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL3 in colonic tissues, and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced or TNF-α–stimulated macrophages in epithelial cells. In contrast, production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2 and IL-4, was increased by the PPARγ agonist J11-Cl. Therefore, the study suggests that PPARγ agonists can be effective therapeutic anti-inflammatory agents for treating UC. Many pro-inflammatory cytokines are regulated by NF-κB, which plays an essential role in regulating the immune response, while its inappropriate regulation has been associated with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, some of which are linked to cancer. Thus, inhibition of the NF-κB pathway could be an effective target for IBD therapy. In this way, recent studies in DSS-induced colitis mice have shown the ability of natural compounds, such as magnolol, an active ingredient of Magnolia officinalis, and Portulaca oleracea extract, from traditional Chinese medicine, to counteract the expression of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-12, via the regulation of NF-κB and PPARγ pathways. Another natural compound, Sargahydroquinoic acid isolated from Sargassum incisifolium, and its semisynthetic derivatives have shown agonist activity of PPARγ in in vitro assays. In addition, it presented dual anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects when evaluated through in vitro cytotoxicity against HT-29 adenocarcinoma and Caco-2 colorectal cancer cells lines in addition to PPARγ activation. At present, there is growing interest in natural products extracted from plants or herbs, especially due to the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that they may present, helping epithelial barrier function and positively regulating the intestinal microbiota. In this regard, the benefit of some natural alkaloids extracted from plants has recently been reported by reducing colonic inflammation in a variety of IBD models. In vitro assays have demonstrated that tetramethylpyrazine significantly inhibits NF-κB translocation via IκB-α-dependent reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8, and the generation of damaging compounds, such as ROS. In addition, the same studies in OXA-induced colitis mice indicated that treatment with Tetramethylpyrazine could improve the outcome of intestinal inflammation via PPARγ signaling-mediated inhibition of NF-kB signaling.

Recently, also described the capability of Tropiseron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties used to counteract chemotherapy-induced emesis, to inhibit NF-κB. To analyze the role of PPARγ in the protective effect of Tropisetron in AA-induced colitis, both macroscopic and histopathological features of the colonic injuries were evaluated, which were considerably improved upon treatment. Likewise, the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, nitric oxide, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were significantly decreased, while an increase of PPARγ was observed, suggesting that the protective effect of tropisetron in the colon may be mediated through PPARγ.

PPARγ Activation by COX2 Products in Ulcerative Colitis

COX2 is also involved in colon inflammation and the pathogenesis of IBD and is mostly known as an intermediate of prostaglandin (PG) production from AA. The endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA) are sources of PGs through oxygenation by COX2 to (PGH2-G) and (PGH2-EA), respectively. Such a relationship between endocannabinoids and PGs is also found between cannabinoids and PPAR agonists. Thus, studied the effect of a bioactive prostaglandin derived from the oxygenation of 2-AG to PGD2-G by COX2 and a hematopoietic PGD synthase (PGDS). They reported the first dual activation of PGD2 receptor (DP1) and PPARγ by PGD2-G and its anti-inflammatory properties in a murine model of colitis. They also proposed that the PPARγ activation could be mediated by 15d-PGJ2-G, a chemical metabolite of PGD2-G that may act as a PPARγ agonist.

Lifestyle and Nutritional Factors as a Strategy Against IBD: Role of PPARs

Though it is unknown whether the anti-inflammatory properties of exercise prevent colonic inflammation in obesity, some studies have reported that exercise may induce the generation of PPARγ ligands in the plasma, which are capable of activating PPARγ signaling within monocytes and contributing to anti‐inflammatory processes. There is even evidence suggesting that moderate exercise may suppress colonic inflammation in obese patients by PPARγ modulation. Regarding this, it has been observed that the upregulation of glucocorticoid-mediated PPARγ activity in the colon can suppress the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines of exercised mice compared with sedentary mice.

Diet and nutritional factors could be complementary strategies for possible interventions for uncontrolled and chronic inflammation of the intestinal mucosa in IBD. It is known that microalgae species are important sources of PUFAs, which are lipid mediators with important effects on inflammation. studied the effects of an oxylipin-containing lyophilized biomass from Chlamydomonas debaryana (Oxylipin) in TNBS-induced colitis mice. They found that oral microalga biomass administration could reduce inflammation of the intestine, showing a significant decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17; amelioration in altered colonic morphology; and an important inhibition of body weight loss. This product could also reduce the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the colon, COX2 and NF-κB, as well as increase PPARγ expression. The nutraceutical uses of this microalga, or derived oxylipins, for the treatment of IBD should be further considered.

PPARα in Ulcerative Colitis

There is scarce scientific information about the role of PPARα in UC. Nevertheless, a few studies in experimental models of colitis have proposed that both endogenous and exogenous PPARα ligands could also have anti-inflammatory properties. PPARα expression is specific in the further differentiated epithelial cells from the lumen of both the small intestine and colon. A recent study also showed that 5-ASA, in addition to interfering with the control of blood lipid levels, could have a double effect by mediating PPARγ and PPARα in the small intestine, contributing positively against intestinal inflammation. It has also been proposed that PPARα participates in the intestinal epithelial barrier system, where the absence of its function may enhance ileum permeability during experimental colitis, while endogenous PPARα ligands can reverse this situation through the regulation of apoptosis. The PPARα exogenous agonist Wy-14643 (pirinixic acid) in an IBD mouse model significantly reduced all the inflammatory parameters, including decreased production of inflammatory factors that contribute to colonic damage, such as IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Glucocorticoids (GC) are the most used anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. With the aim of describing the anti-inflammatory role of GC-mediated PPARα, and both tested the possible synergism between PPARα ligands, such as clorfibrates, and dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, in IBD mouse models. The results of these studies indicated a modulation and improvement of the anti-inflammatory response in IBD murine models, implicating PPARα signaling in the anti-inflammatory activity of glucocorticoids. In this way, verbascoside, a glycoside that can act as an antioxidant, antibiotic, or immunosuppressive agent, and with the capacity to inhibit histamine, AA release, and prostaglandins, was proposed as a compound that can contribute to the anti-inflammatory properties of PPARα in IBD. It has also been described that Verbascoside is able to inhibit neutrophil infiltration, intestinal permeability, and colon injury in animal models of IBD.

Interestingly, parasites can have significant modulatory effects on autoimmune disorders, including IBD. Epidemiologic studies and animal model experiments have shown that a recombinant protein secreted by Schistosoma japonicum (S. japonicum) (rSj16), produced by Escherichia coli (E. coli), may have immunoregulatory effects in vivo and in vitro. In this study, there was a positive effect of rSj16 on DSS-induced colitis by diminishing pro-inflammatory cytokine production, upregulating immunoregulatory cytokine production, and increasing Treg percentages. These effects displayed significant changes in the expression of PPARα signaling genes implicated in the colon, showing the crucial role of PPARα pathway inhibition in DSS-induced colitis development.

N-Acylethanolamides in Ulcerative Colitis

PPARα constitutes an anti-inflammatory signaling system whose endogenous ligands belong to the N-acylethanolamides (NAEs). Endocannabinoid NAEs derivatives with PPARα activity, such as oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), also have anti-inflammatory properties, with evidence that they can protect against colonic inflammation. The main anti-inflammatory property of PEA, which is unable also to bind both CB1 and CB2, is mediated by PPARα, but previous reports have revealed a synergistic activation of PPARβ/δ and PPARγ that could also contribute to PPARα anti-inflammatory activity. Another report showed an improved outcome of inflammation and intestinal permeability in a model of experimental colitis in mice treated with PEA, whose effect was mediated by increased expression of colonic TRPV1 and CB1. Along this line, a novel PEA analogue, adelmidrol, a diethanolamide derivative of azelaic acid with anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive properties, was able to regulate mast cell hyperreactivity in several pathophysiological conditions. This drug showed important anti-inflammatory effects; nonetheless, current studies remain inconclusive as to whether the effect is due to PPARα or PPARγ. However, they all agree that this molecule may represent a new pharmacological approach for chronic inflammation.

Endogenous NAEs are included in the Cannabinoid System (SEC) signaling system, and these comprise enzymes involved in endocannabinoid biosynthesis, such as N-acyl phosphatidylethanolamide-specific phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD), and enzymes involved in its hydrolysis, such as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and N-acylethanolamide hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA). In this regard, treatment with inhibitors of FAAH or its genetic absence may reduce colonic inflammation in rodent models. In addition, PPARα activation by the selective inhibition of NAAA plays a primary role in reducing inflammation in UC. In recent years, several studies have indicated that cannabinoids could be a stronger protective mediator against intestinal inflammation and colorectal cancer. Activation of cannabinoid receptors (CBs) by endocannabinoids influences a great number of digestive and intestinal functions, suggesting a possible treatment with cannabinoids for these pathologies in humans. A recent work by described the circulating levels of endocannabinoids in patients with IBD, and they found increased AEA and OEA, suggesting nonspecific regulation by the Endogenous Cannabinoid System (ECS) in IBD. NAE analogues with PPAR and/or dual cannabinoid/PPAR activity would be good targets in order to restore several features where homeostasis is altered, as in the case of UC. In this way, experimental models are providing robust evidence that the anti-inflammatory role of PPARs should be clarified and determined in patients with UC.

Crohn's Disease

The main characteristic of CD is the presence of inflammation and mucosal ulceration along the gastrointestinal tract, with particular incidence in the distal small intestine. CD is frequently accompanied by fever, abdominal pain, and bowel obstruction or diarrhea. It is known that CD pathophysiology can be influenced by genetic, environmental, and immunobiological factors. Patients with CD are genetically susceptible individuals to environmental factors that alter the mucosal barrier, perturb the microbiota balance of the gut, and stimulate unwelcome immune responses. CD features include discontinuous, transmural inflammation in the bowel wall and an inflammatory response associated with granulomas and lymphoid aggregates. Current treatments include traditional anti-inflammatory agents (corticosteroids), immunomodulators (thiopurines and methotrexate), biological agents, such as antibodies directed against TNF-α, antibiotics, and surgery. The most relevant treatments targeting PPARs in different experimental models to improve the symptoms of IBD are summarized in Table 1.

PPARγ in CD

In the colon, PPARγ is highly expressed, predominantly in the epithelial surface layer. Instead of the very low expression of PPARγ in the epithelium of the colon in both inflamed and noninflamed tissues of UC patients, normal levels were found in the colonic mucosa of both inflamed and noninflamed states of CD patients, and the mechanism for this difference it still unknown. A possible explanation could be related to the regulation of PPARγ expression in epithelial cells from the gut by the lipopolysaccharide bacterial receptor TLR4, whose activation leads to inflammatory cytokine production. TLR4 is responsible for activating the innate immune system and mediating the production of cytokines necessary for the development of effective immunity of inflammatory processes when stimulated by Gram-negative bacteria in the intestine. Regarding UC patients, TLR4 upregulation linked to the impaired expression of PPARγ may produce a lack of tolerance to microbiota in the colon and subsequent chronic inflammation. It was also demonstrated that both PPARγ and TNF-α are overexpressed by adipocytes from the mesentery in patients with CD. Considering the role of PPARγ in lipogenesis, deregulation of PPARγ expression may contribute to the hypertrophy of white adipose tissue of the mesentery. This continued effect stimulates a local inflammatory response via TNF-α production and generates ulceration in the mucosa of the mesenteric border in CD patients. Moreover, PPARγ antagonizes several pro-inflammatory pathways that markedly upregulate the activity of activated macrophages. Studies of PPARγ agonists also include some therapeutic roles in other inflammatory disorders, such as atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, participating in immunoregulation by controlling the responses of helper T-cells in addition to having important roles in the regulatory function of T-cells. The SAMP1/YitFcs mouse model of CD presents similarities to many features of human CD. SAMP1/YitFcs mice present ileitis characterized by affectation of the ileum by discontinuous segmental inflammation that does not occur in the proximal small intestine or colon. The histopathologic features of ileitis in SAMP1/Fc mice include transmural inflammation with abscesses, enlargement, and branching of the crypts and changes in the epithelium that include loss of villi. In connection, PPARγ has been identified as a susceptibility gene in both the SAMP/Yit mouse and in human CD. These similarities suggest that the effect of this gene in humans may be mediated through regulation of PPARγ activity in the crypts of the small intestine.

N−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFAs) are widely used in the diet due to their anti−inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties by inhibiting pro-inflammatory prostaglandin and leukotriene synthesis from the AA pathway. The prolonged intake of long-chain n-3 PUFAs with the diet could be associated with a decreased risk of either UC or CD. However, the basic mechanisms have not yet been clarified. studied the effect of n−3 PUFAs (docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids) on TNBS-induced colitis rats, proposing a putative mechanism via the PPARγ/Nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) pathway. These authors also indicated markedly decreased colonic and localized mucosal inflammation as well as gene expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-2 and IL-4. On the other hand, this study indicated an increase in PPARγ expression and a reduction in NFAT gene expression.

Anti-Fibrotic Effects of PPARs in IBDs

Intestinal fibrosis and localized inflammation are common problems of CD. Fibrosis occurs in at least 30% to 40% of CD cases and can involve all intestinal layers of the gastrointestinal tract affected by the disease. Intestinal fibrosis associated with CD leads to critical luminal narrowing and obstruction and usually requires surgery. and demonstrated that the specific anti-fibrotic property of GED-0507-34 Levo, a 5-ASA analogue, depends on the specific activation of PPARγ and was able to ameliorate intestinal fibrosis in the DSS-induced colitis model. These specific PPARγ ligands, with both anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic activities, could be promising therapeutic approaches for IBD, including UC and CD.

Fibrosis by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components, including collagen, can be a complication of IBD, leading to organ malfunction or failure. The relationship between inflammation and fibrosis in IBD still remains unclear, but it has been described that PPARγ activation is able to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine production, such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6, and also inhibit profibrotic molecules, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), IL-1, and TGF-β, the main promoters of fibrosis. Increased TGF-β1 expression has been observed in the intestinal submucosal layers of fibrotic areas in CD patients. On the other hand, PPARγ agonists can decrease fibrogenesis by inhibiting the effects on TGF-β signaling. Furthermore, some researchers have suggested that PPARγ has both anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in the bowel. In this regard, natural and synthetic ligands of PPARγ have been able to improve the fibrotic condition in both preliminary clinical trials and experimental models of intestinal fibrosis.

Conclusion

PPARs are highly expressed in the colon and are the primary receptors for the regulation of bacteria-induced bowel inflammation. Some studies have indicated an important role for PPARs in tumor suppression, such as colon cancer. Deep knowledge of PPAR expression in the bowel and its function in inflammation will sustain the outcome of possible therapeutic approaches if we act on those targets. In addition, the development of new ligands with therapeutic efficacy on the bowel would be a potential avenue in the search for treatments or preventions of IBD. The discovery of 5-ASA and the effects of TZDs opened the way to developing new molecules targeting PPARs, more specifically PPARγ, in the bowel. Up to now, almost 20 molecules capable of activating PPARs in epithelial cells of the gut have been developed and optimized, even families of compounds that may have more efficacy than 5-ASA for PPAR activation. This approach could also avoid the common side effects of long-term 5-ASA treatment, such as headache, nausea, abdominal pain, fever, pericarditis, and liver and kidney problems, and would also avoid risks for people with allergies to sulfonamides. Therefore, drugs capable of interacting with PPARs have attracted much attention.

Optimization of these new molecules could involve seeking improvements in affinity, efficacy, and safety. Additionally, the development of new compounds as therapies that could interact, directly or indirectly, on the PPAR pathway would avoid the use of corticosteroid therapies and their known side effects, including osteoporosis, aseptic joint necrosis, adrenal insufficiency, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and ophthalmologic effects, hyperlipidemia, growth suppression, and possible congenital malformations.

Therapeutic strategies also reside in the search of drug combinations with additive or synergistic properties via PPARs/RXR heterodimers. In this way, the findings of synergistic effects of PPARs, TZD, and RXR agonists should be considered. Furthermore, natural ligands present in food and commensal bacteria are of interest due to their potential to induce the expression and activation of PPARs in the colon. Currently, anti-inflammatory drugs used to treat IBD are unable to attenuate intestinal fibrosis; thus, their combined action with PPARγ agonists may be a promising therapeutic approach to treat IBD. All these described data suggest the importance of associating natural regulators and synthetic ligands of PPARs as potential drug therapies for patients affected by IBD.

Author Contributions

JD examined the literature and considered references, analyzed, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. PR and AL-G examined the literature and made the figures. AS, FP, EB, FR, and JS made a critical revision of the review.

Funding

This study was supported by the following research projects and programs: Proyecto de Investigación en Salud “PI-0139-2018” funded by Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía; “DTS19/00125” funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “A way to make Europe”; Proyecto de Investigación en Salud “PI19/01577” funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “A way to make Europe”; AS and JS hold “Miguel Servet” research contracts (CP14/00173 and CPII17/00024 respectively) from the ISCIII and co-funded by European Social Fund “Investing in your future” PR holds a “Sara Borrell” research contract (CD16/00067) from the ISCIII and co-funded by European Social Fund “Investing in your future” FP holds a “Programa Nicolás Monardes” contract (C1-0049-2019) from Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Junta de Andalucía.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 211

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  110. 110.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.
  136. 136.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  141. 141.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  145. 145.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  157. 157.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  159. 159.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  160. 160.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  162. 162.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  164. 164.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  165. 165.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  170. 170.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  172. 172.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  173. 173.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  176. 176.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  177. 177.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  179. 179.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  180. 180.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.
  182. 182.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  183. 183.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  184. 184.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  186. 186.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  187. 187.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  190. 190.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  191. 191.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  192. 192.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  193. 193.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  194. 194.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  195. 195.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  196. 196.
  197. 197.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  198. 198.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  199. 199.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  200. 200.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  201. 201.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  202. 202.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  203. 203.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  204. 204.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  205. 205.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  206. 206.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  207. 207.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  208. 208.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  209. 209.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  210. 210.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  211. 211.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.