Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Remote ischemic postconditioning increased cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in newborn piglets after hypoxia-ischemia

Sigrid Kerrn-Jespersen, Sigrid Kerrn-Jespersen, Mads Andersen and 10 more

Frontiers in Pediatrics · 2022

doi:10.3389/fped.2022.933962 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

BackgroundWe have previously investigated neurological outcomes following remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in a newborn piglet model of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The aim of this study was to further investigate potential mechanisms of neuroprotection by comparing newborn piglets subjected to global hypoxia-ischemia (HI) treated with and without RIPC with regards to measures of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and methodsA total of 50 piglets were subjected to 45 min global HI and randomized to either no treatment or RIPC treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 72 h after the HI insult with perfusion-weighted (arterial spin labeling, ASL) and oxygenation-weighted (blood-oxygen-level-dependent, BOLD) sequences in the whole brain, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cortex. Four sham animals received anesthesia and mechanical ventilation only.ResultsPiglets treated with RIPC had higher measures of cerebral blood flow in all regions of interest and the whole brain (mean difference: 2.6 ml/100 g/min, 95% CI: 0.1; 5.2) compared with the untreated controls. They also had higher BOLD values in the basal ganglia and the whole brain (mean difference: 4.2 T2*, 95% CI: 0.4; 7.9). Measures were similar between piglets treated with RIPC and sham animals.ConclusionPiglets treated with RIPC had higher measures of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the whole brain and several regions of interest compared with untreated controls 72 h after the HI insult. Whether this reflects a potential neuroprotective mechanism of RIPC requires further study.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.