Construction and Validation of Convenient Clinicopathologic Signatures for Predicting the Prognosis of Stage I-III Gastric Cancer

BackgroundPatients with stage I-III gastric cancer (GC) undergoing R0 radical resection display extremely different prognoses. How to discriminate high-risk patients with poor survival conveniently is a clinical conundrum to be solved urgently.MethodsPatients with stage I-III GC from 2010 to 2016 were included in our study. The associations of clinicopathological features with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined via Cox proportional hazard model. Nomograms were developed which systematically integrated prognosis-related features. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to compare DFS and OS among groups. The results were then externally validated by The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University.ResultsA total of 585 and 410 patients were included in the discovery cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. T stage, N stage, lymphatic/vascular/nerve infiltration, preoperative CEA, and CA19-9 were independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Two prognostic signatures with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.7502 for DFS and 0.7341 for OS were developed based on the nomograms. The 3-year and 5-year calibration curves showed a perfect correlation between predicted and observed outcomes. Patients were divided into three risk groups (low, intermediate, high), and distinct differences were noticed (p < 0.001). Similar results were achieved in the validation cohort. Notably, a free website was constructed based on our signatures to predict the recurrence risk and survival time of patients with stage I-III GC.ConclusionsThe signatures demonstrate the powerful ability to conveniently identify distinct subpopulations, which may provide significant suggestions for individual follow-up and adjuvant therapy.

Abstract licence: CC BY

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.