A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection has become the primary option of treatment for early gastric cancer. However, lymph node metastasis may lead to poor prognosis. We analyzed factors related to lymph node metastasis in EGC patients, and we developed a construction prediction model with machine learning using data from a retrospective series.MethodsTwo independent cohorts’ series were evaluated including 305 patients with EGC from China as cohort I and 35 patients from Spain as cohort II. Five classifiers obtained from machine learning were selected to establish a robust prediction model for lymph node metastasis in EGC.ResultsThe clinical variables such as invasion depth, histologic type, ulceration, tumor location, tumor size, Lauren classification, and age were selected to establish the five prediction models: linear support vector classifier (Linear SVC), logistic regression model, extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine model (LightGBM), and Gaussian process classification model. Interestingly, all prediction models of cohort I showed accuracy between 70 and 81%. Furthermore, the prediction models of the cohort II exhibited accuracy between 48 and 82%. The areas under curve (AUC) of the five models between cohort I and cohort II were between 0.736 and 0.830.ConclusionsOur results support that the machine learning method could be used to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer and perhaps provide another evaluation method to choose the suited treatment for patients.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 18.

   Effect of Age on Breast Cancer Patient Prognoses: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER 18 Database · 2016

2. 25.

   Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19–9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer · 2017

3. 36.

   Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction · 2019

4. 37.

   Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical development: a translational perspective · 2019

36 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.